we want to dive back into our discussion with kristin henning, a professor of law at georgetown law schoole not going to blame the people who are involved in the violence, if you are not going to blame their families, who is at fault? and how do we stabilize the community? >> it's interesting. part of what i think needs to happen is to refolk us the conversation. i think so much of the conversation of blame is about who do we hold accountable as opposed to a system-wide, community-wide solution to violence. and so i think what i'd love to see is a comprehensive preventative strategy from the beginning. let's stop talking about blame and let's talk about solutions. when i talk about a comprehensive preventive strategy i'm talking about evidence-based programs that are shown to prevent violence from before a child is born all the way through early adulthood. >> like what? >> so what does that look like? so there are at the prenatal stage there are evidence-based programs called for example, nurse/family partnerships where nurses visit homes and help young mothers or expecting mothers prepare

professor laura donahue is a professor of law at georgetown law, director of georgetown center on national security and the law and director of the center on privacy and technology. professor donahue writes on u.s. constitutional law, american and british legal history, and national security and counterterrorist law in the united states and united kingdom. she is the author of "the cost of counterterrorism: power, politics and liberty," "counterterrorist law and emergency law in the united kingdom, 1922 to 2000," and the forthcoming "the future of foreign intelligence," focusing on the fourth amendment and surveillance in a digital world. professor donahue obtained a bachelor of arts and philosophy from dartmouth college, a master's from northern ireland, a j.d. from stanford law school and a ph.d. in history from the university of cambridge england. please welcome professor laura donahue. >> thank you very much. thank you very much, president aconde, dean perry associate dean jefferson, dr. gibson, miss gibby and members of the committee for inviting me to join you for the hancock symposi

georgetown law center and author of a book restoring the lost constitution and a political science review -- vassar at texas state university landmark cases -- live monday on c-span c-span3, and radio. onn american history tv saturday, november 7, four tours and live interviews. we will explore the tank submarine experience, the road to berlin, an african-american story. we will take your questions for historians throughout the day. later,ar ii -- 70 years saturday, november 7, beginning at 11:00 a.m. eastern here on american history tv on c-span3. >> each week, american artifacts takes you to museums to show what artifacts reveal about american history. located in stanton, virginia, the frontier culture museum tells the story of migrants from europe, we visit original houses -- we learn about how national politics impact in this area before the civil war. this is the second of a two-part series. joe: i am the director of marketing here at the frontier culture museum. we are a living history museum with a mission focused on education. our objective here is teach people how a unique folk c

supreme court history as we explored this case with our guests, randy barnett, professor at georgetown university law and, paul kent, political five professor at texas state university. "landmark cases" live monday at nine about user on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. >> "american history tv those quote is featuring c-span's original series, "first ladies: influence and image." series anduced this cooperation with the wte

professor laura donohue is a professor of law at georgetown law, director of georgetown center of national security and director of the center of privacy and technology. she writes on u.s. constitutional law and national security in the united states and the united kingdom. she is the author of the cost of covered terrorism, counterterrorist law and the united kingdom, 1922-2000 and the forthcoming, the future of foreign intelligence. professor donahue obtained a bachelor of arts and philosophy from dartmouth college, a jd from stanford law school, and a phd in history from the university of cambridge, england. please welcome professor laura donahue. [applause] [applause] donahue: thank you very much. thank you very much, president, it dean, associated in jefferson, dr. gibson, ms. gibby, and members of the committee for inviting me to the symposium. particularly the sure, as you commemorate the 70th university of sir winston churchill's address. privilege tor and be her. as a graduate of churchill college, cambridge, i have more than a little loyalty and respect for sir winston. i returne

she was director of georgetown national security and law. this took place in september at westminster college in missouri. this is just under one hour. >> hello, everyone. i am a senior here address minster college. i had the pleasure of serving on the symposium committee this past year. i am honored to introduce professor laura donahue, our opening plenary speaker. she is a professor at georgetown and director of the center on privacy and technology. professor donahue writes on u.s. constitutional law, history, and national security and counter terrorist law in the united kingdom. books and author of the forthcoming book on fourth amendment and digital surveillance. she obtained a bachelor of arts from doug ruth college, a inters in peace studies northern ireland, a jd from stanford law school and a phd from the university of england. please welcome professor donahue. [applause] donahue: thank you very much. thank you very much, president, it dean, associated in jefferson, dr. gibson, ms. gibby, and members of the committee for inviting me

but not least lee, paul butler who is the author of let's set it free and he is a professor at georgetown law. we are so delighted to have you here. i feel very happy. i want to view it say a few more things about april. she is a longtime commentator on american politics. she has been a reporter for more than 30 years and in that amount of time she has seen her share of politicians. she has been a white house correspondent since 1997. she covered the presidency of bill clinton, george w. bush and barack obama. i think if you read her book you will find its accomplished through a lot of years of observation and being close to that world of the american presidency. she's learned a lot, that's for you sure. i think from my vantage point, what's most important about april is not the reporting itself but what she does with her reporting. she is one of two african-american journalists assigned to the white house and she has been intent on leaving that platform to bring you information that is too often ignored and marginalized. over the years she literally has become herself a resource for millions

law and was fined $50. refusing to pay, he took his case all the way to the supreme court. is one of thet most controversial decisions in supreme court history. randy barnett at georgetown university law center and author of the book, "restoring the lost constitution." and paul kens. landmark cases, live monday at 9:00 p.m. et. >> all campaign long, c-span takes you on the road to the white house. unfiltered access to the candidates at town hall meetings, news conferences, rallies and speeches. every campaign event we cover is available on our website at c-span.org. >> carly fiorina hosted the town hall meeting in buford, south carolina, or she talked about foreign policy, the economy and investment issues. thank you, so much. it is great to be back here in south carolina. shannon, thank you for that wonderful introduction and thank you children for the pledge of allegiance that you did so well. how many of you watched the benghazi hearings? course, hillary clinton continues not to answer the fundamental question, which is, since she clearly knew this was a purposeful terror attack on the night it was going on, why did she get up the next day and address the american pe

he's one of the most respected civil rights attorneys in the country as well as a professor at georgetown law. we are so delighted also to have you, another friend of our store. so i feel, you know, very, very happy to be in such great company with all of them and with all of you. so they are terrific. but i just want to say a couple more things about april. many of you know she's a very familiar voice on american urban radio, longtime commentator on american politics, been a reporter for more than 30 years and, obviously, in that amount of time she's seen her share of politics and politicians. she's been a white house correspondent for the networks since 1997, covered the presidencies of bill clinton, george w. bush and barack obama. and i think that if you read her book, you'll find that it's a compilation of a lot of yores of observation -- a lot of years of observation and a lot of years of immersion in that world of the american presidency, and she's learned a lot, for sure. but i think at least from my vantage point what is most important about april is not the reporting itself, but sor

when i was a law student at georgetown, the honor society law students invited the supreme court for lunch. and they came, under the insistence that they don't have a head table. that they sit at tables with some of the students. withfe and i got to sit hugo blythe. he was a man who had been a segregationist from the south. and he joined in these historic things. if we are going to do something significant in this country it will have to be done unanimously to otherwise people will question what the court is doing. you and i know that is not always going to happen. i think the war it court tried i thinkd to do that. when you see some of the bitter dissent in some cases, it is because you have justices who know, why didn't we work harder to make this unanimous? bush versus gore is very hard for people to agree to, because it was a split court. citizens united. these were cases. shelby county. notes, i'm just going over some of these things. it so split the court that justice stevens read his dissent, it was a scolding dissent from the bench -- sca lding dissent from the bench. justice

next, on c-span, georgetown university law professor laura donahue on balancing individual rights and national security. then, washington journal visits a maryland prison to discuss the national justice system

controversial decisions the supreme court has ever made as we explore this case with randy barnett from georgetown lawnter and author of a book restoring the lost constitution and a political science review -- vassar at texas state university landmark cases -- live monday on c-span c-span3, and radio. onn american history tv saturday, november 7, four tours and live interviews. we will explore the tank submarine experience, the road to berlin, an african-american story. we will take your questions for historians throughout the day. later,ar ii -- 70 years saturday, november 7, beginning at 11:00 a.m. eastern here

donohue is ara professor of law at georgetown law, director of georgetown center of national security and director of the center of privacy and technology. she writes on u.s. constitutional law and national security in the united states and the united kingdom. she is the author of the cost of covered terrorism, counterterrorist law and the united kingdom, 1922-2000 and the forthcoming, the future of foreign intelligence. professor donahue obtained a bachelor of arts and philosophy jdm dartmouth college, a from stanford law school, and a phd in history from the university of cambridge, england. please welcome professor laura donahue. [applause] prof. donahue: thank you very much. president, dean, associate dean, dr. gibson, ms. gibby, and members of the committee, for inviting me to join you for the hancock symposium. as you commemorate the 70th anniversary of sir winston churchill's address to westminster college, it is an honor and a privilege to be here. as a graduate of churchill college, cambridge, i have loyalty and tremendous respect for sir winston. i returned to the college ev

the professional of constitutional law at the -- georgetown university law center, randy barnett, discusses along with paul kens, a political science professor from texas state university. an3, andn, c sent -- csp c-span radio. announcer: today, the house debated a bill on the health care law and it would defund planned parenthood for one year. the house is scheduled to vote on the bill tomorrow. the beginning of the debate with the rules committee. this is 45 minutes. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from georgia is recognized for one hour. mr. woodall: thank you, mr. speaker. during consideration of this resolution all time is yielded for the purpose of debate only. i'd like to yield the customary 30 minutes to my friend from new york, ms. slaughter, pending which i yield myself such time as i may consume. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. woodall: i'd also like to ask unanimous consent that all members have five legislative days to revise and extend remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection. mr. woodall: i want to start with the end of what our reading clerk

court history and we explore this case with artist randy barnett professor of constitutional law at georgetown university law center and the author of the book restoring the constitution. and paul came to the political science ambassador at texas state university and author of lochner versus new york economic regulation on trial landmark cases live tonight at my eastern on c-span and c-span radio. >>> i am the c-span capital help reduce her and i usually cover the house and senate floor legislation goings-on and then also other key events on capitol hill. as a network we are committed to covering the hearings gavel to gavel with a very high-profile hearing we've covered all the hearings by the select committee on benghazi come in the house of representatives. so this is one of the next in the series we covered. i got there at 7:00 in the morning and the crews were already set up. they put cameras in before and got in place very early in the morning for a morning show washington journal said they could show what was going on in the hearing room even before anybody was getting there. i was start

ofdy barnett, professor constitutional law at georgetown university law center and author of the bookrestoring the constitution," along with paul kent, political science professor at texas state university to discuss these landmark cases live tonight on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. all campaign long, suzanne takes you on the road to the white house. unfiltered access to the candidates at townhall hall meetings, news conferences, rallies, and speeches. comments ong your twitter, facebook, and by phone. and every campaign event we cover is available on our website www.c-span.org. >> democratic residential contenders hillary clinton, bernie sanders, and martin o'malley, all took part at this last weekend jefferson jackson dinner in iowa. they were marks are just over two hours. >> thank you, everyone. please take your seats. can we just take a moment to give a hand for the catering staff and bartender sap that have made this so successful? [applause] honored to introduce our featured speakers this evening, our democratic presidential candidate. -- candidates. [applause] -- watchedt

that, joost from the georgetown university law center these and many other things. -- we start by saying will work on the presumption that this will be a resounding success. it may be a tall hypothesis sent assumption, but i would request all panelists to work on that assumption as we progress. let me try to recall the fact that the current global trading system was created, maintained and developed by those participating. and they don't take that assignment likely -- lightly. so obviously the effect is something that presumably they also care about. secondly, just recently they two weeks ago committed to the sustainable development including the commitment to eradicate poverty. the development of the world is of course a relevant one. third, developing countries with mitigation strategies to after agreements to which there are nonparties. i hope that the panels will be able to have a conversation to what would be the infeasible mitigation strategies. the bedrock it is on which all nations build their insurance system for global trade. i would like the panel to address what could be the

appeals and motions in federal and state courts across the country and is an adjunct professor of law at georgetowniversity law center teaching e class on supreme court advocacya before joining williams and connolly in 2008 he served as an assistant to the solicitor general in justice department. he clerked on the u.s. court of appeals for the 4th circuit.a last we'll hear from paul smithe a partner at jenner and blk llp chair of the appellate and supreme court practice and h co-chair of theas media and fir amendment and election law and redistricting practices, an argu active supreme court practice for three decades including orae arguments in 16 supreme court cases involving matters ranging from free speech and civil rights to civil procedure. among his important victories have been lawrence v. texas, the landmark gay rights case and brown v. entertainment merchants association, establishing the first amendment rights of thosem who produce and sell video games. he's also lead counsel for respondents in harris v. arizona independent redistricting commission. so, with all of that. in >> 'emte going

michaels college, which is a vermont institution, graduated georgetown university law center. he was first appointed as the state's attorney when he was 26 years old. he was then re-elected on two separate occasions. during that time, pat leahy was a nationally renowned prosecutor. in 1974, his last as state attorney, he was selected as one of the three most outstanding prosecutors in america. at age 34, pat became the first democrat in u.s. history to be elected to the senate from vermont. after he was elected, the republican senator he was to succeed, george aken, was asked to resign his seat a day early which you could do in those days to give senator leahy a head start with his fellow freshmen. here is what the senator said -- a firm that is foolish enough to elect a democrat, let him be number 100. unquote. senator leahy's career has proven the people of vermont were wise in selecting him. from number 100, senator leahy over time has ascended to the rank of president pro tempore of the senate. senator leahy has spent his four decades here in the senate fighting for justic

court history as we explore this case with our guest, randy barnett, professor of constitutional law at georgetown university law center and author of the book "restoring the lost constitution." and paul ken, political science professor at texas state university and author of "lochner v. new york" landmark cases, live tonight at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span3, and -span radio. >> c-span's road to the white house coverage continues now with remarks from republican presidential candidate, carly firoina. she spoke friday to supporters on the economy, persecution of christians, and hillary clinton's appearance before the house select committee on benghazi. from south carolina, this is 50 minutes. ms. firoina: thank you so much. great to be here back in something sfpblgt thank you for that wonderful introduction. thank you, children, for the pledge of allegiance, you did so well. how many of you watched the benghazi hearings a little bit? clinton se hillary continues not to answer the fundamental question, which is, since she clearly knew that this was a purposeful terrorist attack on the night that i

randy barnett is that georgetown university law school, professor, author of restoring the lost constitutionresumption of liberty, and he's argued before the supreme court. paul kens wrote the book on lochner, he wrote a book called lochner v. new york. university ofs texas. important? case >> it was made a symbol by teddy roosevelt when he ran. he claimed the court had overreached and overstepped its bounds. ever since then, it has been a political flashpoint because it was during the presidential campaign. >> which side? roosevelt claimed that this was a product of laissez-faire economics, which is what he got from the dissenting opinion of justice holmes. roosevelt put justice holmes on the court and was extolling him as a model of what a justice should be. ins running to be reelected justice he elevated holmes. , that it importance did not have until the campaign. this was the battle between aggressive's arguing for increasing state regulation of all kinds of economic activities and those who favored a more free market economic system who believed that the constitution protected the libe

randy barnett is at georgetown university law school, he's a professor, author of restoring the lost constitution, resumption of liberty, and he's argued before the supreme court. thank you for being with us. paul kens wrote the book on lochner, his book is called lochner v. new york. his home base is texas state university. why is this case important? the case has become a political symbol. and it was made into a political symbol by teddy roosevelt when he ran for president in 1912. symbol of how court had overreached and overstepped its bounds. ever since then, it has been a political flashpoint because it was made a political flashpoint in a presidential campaign. host: for which side? guest: roosevelt claimed that this was a product of laissez-faire economics, which is what he got from the dissenting opinion of justice holmes. roosevelt put justice holmes on the court and was extolling him as a model of what a justice should be. he put them on the court when he was president, and he's running to be reelected in 1912, so he and elevates his case, called the bakeshop case. politica

pre-court history as we explore this case with our guest, randy barnett, professor of constitutional law at georgetown and author of the book "restoring the lost constitution," and paul kent, political science professor at texas state university. monday. cases, live >> next, british prime minister david cameron takes questions from members of the british house of commons. then republican presidential candidate donald trump at a rally in miami. at 11:00 p.m., another chance to see "q&a" with amy chozick. >> on wednesday, members of parliament questioned british prime minister david cameron on domestic issues, including the steel industry, recent tax credit cuts, and security for people with disabilities. this is just over 35 minutes. >> order. questions for the prime minister. alan jones. >> question one. this morning, i had meetings with ministerial colleagues and in addition to my duties in this house, i shall have further such meetings today. >> i would like to thank the prime minister. an expensive public consultation. the government retail sector champion describes our current sunday trading laws

randy barnett is georgetown university law school, professor. author of a book called "restoring the law and constitution: the presumption of liberty." he's argued before the supreme court. randy barnett, thank you for being with us. >> great. >> paul kens actually wrote the book on locker in, his book, "economic regulations on trial," his home base is texas states university where he teaches political science. thanks. well, i'm telling people they should be interested in this. why don't you explain why, both of you. why is this case important? >> well, the case has become a symbol in -- a political symbol. it was made into a political symbol by teddy roosevelt when he ran for president in 1912. it was about how roosevelt claimed that the court had overreached and overstepped its bounds to block progressive legislation from being enacted at the state level. ever since then, it's been a political flashpoint. it was made a political flash its point in a presidential campaign. >> political flashpoint for which side? >> well, roosevelt claim e eed l

supreme court history as we explored this case with our guests, randy barnett, professor at georgetown university law and, paul kent, political five professor at texas state university. "landmark cases" live monday at nine about user on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. >> "american history tv those quote is featuring c-span's original series, "first ladies: influence and image." series anduced this cooperation with the white house historical association, with conversations with experts, tors of historical sites, and questions from c-span's audience, we tell the stories of the first ladies. now, lady bird johnson. this is about two hours. ♪ lady bird johnson: a beautification to my mind is far more than a matter of cosmetics. to me, it describes the whole effort to bring the natural world and the man-made world into harmony. to bring order, usefulness, delight to our whole environment. that, of course, only begins with trees, flowers, and landscaping. susan swain: that's from a film created by the johnson administration with lady bird johnson talking about beautification, her signature issue as firs

hard that mukherjee looks into how medicine and scientific research intersect in "the laws of medicine." former georgetown university professor dennis ross are' "doomed to succeed" traces the development of policy towards israel and the middle east as a whole. david talbot warns against the growth of what he considers america's national security state in "the devil's chessboard." and in empire of self, middlebury college professor of english jay parini recalls the life of gore vidal. look for titles in in the bookstores this week and watch for the authors in the future on c-span2. >> host: glenn beck, in your newest book why do you open with thomas jefferson and the library of congress? >> guest: because jefferson changed hi life. he wrote -- my life. he wrote a letter to his nephew, peter carr. peter was 15, 14, somewhere in that a area. his mother had died, his father was about to the to die, and his father said to thomas, thomas l you oversee the education of my son when i pass on? smartest man i know. is he said, sure. so when peter comes of age, he writes him this beautiful letter. and he says in mat

joining us from washington, david good friend, teaches law at georgetown university.in the clinton administration. and keith boynton from miami who has also searched as a special assistant to bill clinton. start with you, what do you think about that letter? >> >> i think it's a good move on the part of the dnc to work with the black lives matter movement. the official movement. not everybody out in the street. i do think quite frankly they are a natural coalition. the democratic party needs to have the support of the african-american community. and the african-american community is concerned about the 923 police shootings this year. concerned about the 2.2 million people incarcerated in our country, highest of any country in the planet. they're concerned about the issues of african-americans not being addressed by the larger political climate. i think it's important to have that conversation. >> all right. so you believe that the democratic party is correct in elm bracing a radical group, a group that calls for police officers to be killed. do i have your opinion co

vinod aggarwal, university of california, berkeley to speak out about joost pauwelyn from georgetown university lawer and finally harsha singh, ict and many other things. but let me start by saying this is been rather gloomy i must say on the ticket and, of course, it's effectiveness of whether it exists. so we work on the presumption of this seminar that ttip will be a resounding success. it may be a tall hypothesis, an assumption judging from previous panels but i would across all panelists to work on the assumption as we progressed because nothing in something doesn't exist obviously does not have an affect. so why this question is very important from the point of view of my perspective and what i thought it was very good that cato put this is one of the key topics and for specific session. well, let me first try to recall the fact that actually the court global trading system was created, maintained and developed by the participants in ttip. and they don't take that assignment lightly in terms of their commitment to bilateral trading system, neither of the parties. so the effects of ttip is som

decisions and supreme court history as we explore this case with randy barnett, professor at georgetown university lawter and author of the book "restoring the ens,titution," and paul k political science professor at texas state university. like tonight on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. c-span has your coverage of the road to the white house 2016 where you will find the speeches, thee debates, and most importantly, your questions. this year, we are taking our road to the white house coverage into classrooms across the country as our student camp contest, giving students the opportunity to discuss what important issues they want to hear the most from the candidates. follow c-span's student can contest and rode to the white house coverage to the 16th on tv, on the radio, and online at c-span.org. announcer: "washington journal" continues. host: joining us from new york is simone weichselbaum of the marshall project. she is a staff writer for the organization and we are talking about the criminal justice system and the efforts to reform that. good morning to you. guest: thanks for having me. host: re

pre-court history as we explore this case with our guest, randy barnett, professor of constitutional law at georgetown author of the book "restoring the lost constitution," and paul kent, political science professor at texas state university. landmark cases, live

professor of constitutional law at georgetown university author of the book "restoring the lost constitution." and a professor at texas state university, economic regulation on trial. landmark cases, live monday at 8:00 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. week, american history tv sits in on a lecture with one of the nation's college professors. you can watch the classes here every saturday evening at 8:00 p.m. and midnight eastern. ellishistorian joseph leads a talk on the early revolutionary war through the letters of john and abigail adams. this is at amherst college. this is part 2 of a two-part lecture. >> we last saw abigail adams giving birth to four children, five really. over a 12 year period. the question i asked you is, how should we assess her role in the coming of the american revolution? sexist ortent is it just the opposite of that, to call attention to the fact that the dominant events in her life are biological, rather than, political? someone who wants to be true to the experience of women at this time, does that mean you are going to be not interested in the

randy barnett, professor at georgetown university law kens, political science professor at texas stateniversity. cases, live monday at 9 p.m. eastern on c-span, c-span3, and c-span radio. >> i stay in the wings and don't come out too often, so this is quite unusual for me. what i do want to thank all of you for your friendship and your and for planning this wonderful evening for me. i shall remember it always. and thank you for this great welcome. >> pat nixon was the first republicans -- republican first lady to address the national convention. he traveled more widely than any , madelady before her volunteerism her issue, and behind-the-scenes she was nixon's political advisor. at nixon, this sunday night 8:00 p.m. eastern. sunday and it got p.m. eastern on american history tv on c-span3. >> "washington journal" continues. host: again, for the remainder of our time, democrats only. answer this question for us. to win the white house, democrats need to -- and then you can fill in the rest. for those who support hillary clinton, (202) 748-8000. for those who support bernie sanders, (202

at 9:30 eastern, georgetown professor laura donohue on privacy laws and modern surveillance programs. she talks about nsa efforts to collect online pictures, video and other materials from people who have not been accused of committing any wrongdoing. here's a portion of what you'll see tonight. >> webcam images and chat sessions also appear to be collected under executive order 12333. gchq is one of our big partners, from 2008 to 2010 they referenced a program called optic nerve in which yahoo webcam chats were collected in bulk regardless of whether the user was a foreign intelligence target. during one six month period they collected visual data from 1.8 millio

argued dozens of appeals in federal and state courts across the country and a prof s professor of law at georgetown university. before joining williams & connolly's supreme court and appellate practice in 2008 he served as solicit general to the department of justice and clerked for supreme court justice scalia. last we will hear from paul ciancia a partner at jenner & block's appellate and supreme court practice where he is chair of the appellate supreme court practice and he has had an active supreme court practice for three decades including oral arguments in 16 supreme court cases involving matters from free speech, civil rights, to civil procedures. and lawrence v texas, the landmark gay rights case, and brown vs merchant are some of the biggest cases he has fought. so with all that, i am going to turn it over to mike to start hearing how our rulers intend to govern us over the next year. >> well, hopefully it will be a little different than last term. i will discuss friedrichs, which without prejudice, i think it is the most important case that has been graded so far and i mean it because it

at 9:30 eastern, georgetown professor laura donohue on privacy laws and modern surveillance programs. she talks about nsa efforts to collect online pictures, video and other materials from people who have not been accused of committing any wrongdoing. here's a portion of what you'll see tonight. >> webcam images and chat sessions also appear to be collected under executive order 12333. gchq is one of our big partners, from 2008 to 2010 they referenced a program called optic nerve in which yahoo webcam chats were collected in bulk regardless of whether the user was a foreign intelligence target. during one six month period they collected visual data from 1.8 million yahoo! users. turns out that nudity is a real problem. they're trying to figure out how to keep their agents from looking at all the nude photographs that are sent, but they're finding it hard to filter out for the nude pictures. text messages are similarly not immune. the nsa collected almost 200 million text messages per day globally, using them to ascertain travel plans, social networks and credit card details. let me be

law enforcement. stephen tschida live in georgetown tonight. what is the warning all about? stephen: first, the f.b.i. is not saying anything specific about any specific threat. however, we are in the heart of georgetown. come saturday night, this area will be filled with halloween partiers and this is the type of situation the f.b.i. is concerned about. halloween festivities draw huge crowds in the capital. this year, the f.b.i. warn there may be reason to be frightened. >> that is crazy. absolutely insane. >> the f.b.i. issued an alert to law enforcement agencies across the country. it states potentially dangerous anarchist group similar to those which targeted the international monetary fund and world bank in the past may be planning to use halloween as a cover to target police. >> i don't think they are overblowing it. they are being protective. >> they identify them as the national liberation militia. it states the group may be planning a halloween revolt. the strategy, wear masks. infiltrate halloween festivities. cause disturbances to lawyer police ands attack the off

i was in law school at the time in georgetown. about it. us talking toaid we all have a right vote. i grew up in vermont. assumed that. i came down here, and i realized that way.always work the way youzed that could have things where you dis proportionate to voting. said no. we're americans. americans can vote and americans be allowed to vote. host: the impact of it over the court of time has been what? senator leahy: i think it has much in thenged united states. i think one of the impacts is trying to erode it. you have to ask why. justiceu mention chief warren. several of the cases are from his tenure. when you look back at warren period, haas his significance on court's history? the facteahy: i think unanimousied to get a court. there was going to be a split court. they kept it going a couple of thes win -- years, i think court complexity changed. then they had it unanimous. that president eisenhower would have felt the need to enforce hadn't been unanimous supreme court. society law schools invited the supreme court for theh, and they came on insistent they don't have a head tab

. >>> also coming up tonight at 9:30 eastern on c-span, georgetown professor laura donahue on privacy lawsand modern surveillance programs. she talks about nsa efforts to collect online pictures, video, and other materials from people who've not been accused of committing any wrongdoing. here's a portion of what you'll see tonight. is. >> web cam images and chat sessions appear to be collected under executive order 12033. gchq is one of our big partners. the government communication headquarters. the nsa's counterpart in the you mited kingdom. from 2008 to 2010, gchq files reference a program called optic nerve in which yahoo web cam chats were collected in bulk rega regardless of whether that person was a target. they collected visual data from 1.8 million yahoo users turns out nudity is a real problem. they're trying to figure out how to keep their agents from looking at the nude photographs sent but finding it hard to filter out for the nude pictures. text messages are similarly not immune. under executive order 12333, the nsa collected almost 200 million text messages per day globally

i was in law school at the time in georgetown. i remember us talking about it. i said we all have a right to vote. i grew up in vermont. you assumed that. i came down here, and i realized it didn't always work that way. i also realized that the way you could have things where you dis proportionate to voting. they said no. we're americans. americans can vote and americans should be allowed to vote. host: the impact of it over the court of time has been what? senator leahy: i think it has probably changed much in the united states. i think one of the impacts is you see people trying to erode it. you have to ask why. host: you mention chief justice warren. several of the cases are from his tenure. when you look back at warren period, haas his significance on the court's history? senator leahy: i think the fact that he tried to get a unanimous court. there was going to be a split court. they kept it going a couple of years win -- years, i think the court complexity changed. then they had it unanimous. i don't think that president eisenhower would have felt the abili

. >> later tonight, privacy law and modern surveillance. a discussion with georgetownofessor, laura donohue. here is what some of she has to say. donohue: the government communication headquarters, the nsa's headquarter in the night kingdom. were! webcam chats collected in bowl, regardless of whether that user was a foreign intelligence target. with the help of the nsa, a collective visual data from 1.8 million yahoo! users. it turns out that nudity is the real problem. they are finding it hard to filter out for the new pictures -- nude pictures. text messages are similarly not immune. the nsa collected almost 200 million text messages globally, using them to ascertain travel plans, credit cards. let me be clear. this information is being collected on individuals who are not themselves suspected of any illegal activity. , we will have more from professor donahue on security law -- privacy law and at 9:30ance tonight eastern time. yesterday, we heard from a mixup presidential candidates at the no labels conference, including jim webb. >> thank you for all being here. i

lest next to him is a professor at georgetown's and the director of the institute for law, science, and global security, katherine has done a tremendous amount of work and she was the adviser to brent scowcroft, and was in the office of the general counsel at the cia at the start of her career. and is currently involved in so many international discussions i won't even list them. colonel gary brown to the left of the ambassador, is current lay professor at the -- professor of cyber security at the marine corps in quantico. prior that he was in the icrc here in the washington office and he has been in the judge advocates corps -- i thought you were in cybercommand, too. >> i was. >> and other military commands. so, very experiencees in this. finally, david simon, one of the 'named lawyers in "the new york times" article yesterday. he's looking down. i shouldn't have said that. former special counsel to dod. the general counsel's office for a long time, and currently is doing a lot with other security issues and one of the real experts we call on here in washington. so, i don't think we'l

. >>> and later tonight on c-span, it's georgetown professor laura donahue, and she discusses privacy laws and modern surveillance programs. she recently delivered the keynote address at a national security conference at westminster college in fulton, missouri. see her remarks starting at 9:30 eastern, also on c-span. and back here on c-span2 tonight, it's more booktv. the focus will be the supreme court. with a number of related program ares, including one featuring current justice stephen breyer. that gets underway at eight eastern here on c-span2. >> c-span has your coverage of the road to the white house 2016 where you'll find the candidates, the speeches, the debates and, most importantly, your questions. this year we're taking our road to the white house coverage into class rooms across the country with our student cam contest. giving students the opportunity to discuss what important issues they want to hear the most from the candidates. follow c-span's student cam contest and road to the white house coverage 2016 on tv, on the radio and online at c-span.org. >> and now a hearing lo

was not unsunbathing in the nude >>> law enforcement agents helped free nearly 150 children from human traffickers. >>> an accusation tonight that retailers in georgetowne app to racially profile people who are hanging out in the neighborhood. okay. so everyone is saying, "hey! you gotta get fios!" but why? why fios? well fios is a 100 percent fiber optic network, so you can get 100% out of all your devices. whatever speed you need, fios has it. so if you need more streaming for more devices fios gives you options with the fastest internet and wi-fi available from 50 to 500 mpbs. and we're not just talking downloads. we're talking equal upload speeds, too. you can upload your favorite videos up to 5x faster than cable. plus with the fios mobile app, you can view your entertainment at home, or on the go. but the main reason to get fios? we're rated number 1 in customer satisfaction. why fios? ultimately that's why. right now, get 50 meg fios internet, tv & phone starting at $79.99 a month guaranteed for two years. plus get $300 back with a two year agreement. get out of the past. get fios. >>> many georgetown retailers are using an app to combat shoplif

she is a professor at georgetown and director of the center on privacy and technology. professor donahue writes on u.s. constitutional law, history, and national security and counter terrorist law in the united kingdom. books and author of the forthcoming book on fourth amendment and digital surveillance. she obtained a bachelor of arts from doug ruth college, a inters in peace studies northern ireland, a jd from stanford law school and a phd from the university of england. please welcome professor donahue. [applause] donahue: thank you very much. thank you very much, president, it dean, associated in jefferson, dr. gibson, ms. gibby, and members of the committee for inviting me to the symposium. particularly the sure, as you commemorate the 70th university of sir winston churchill's address. privilege tor and be her. as a graduate of churchill college, cambridge, i have more than a little loyalty and respect for sir winston. i returned every summer to avail myself of his great legacy and to center my thoughts in an increasingly complex and swift-moving world. in our archives, for many years we had one of winston churchi