neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh as they heard arguments in a major abortion case. watch this. >> i want to tell you gorsuch, i want to tell you kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful

just as gorsuch -- justice gorsuch: counsel -- justice kavanaugh: if the statute, just to be clear, if the statute said aid, abet, or solicit, that would be constitutional? mr. fleming: it would not, justice cavanagh, because of the civil criminal issue we have been discussing. it would say aid, abet or solicit conduct that in itself is not criminal. let's make no mistake about what the government -- justice kavanaugh: if we didn't -- if we didn't agree with you on that point, would -- and it said aid, abet or solicit, would it then be constitutional? mr. fleming: i still do not think it would be because -- justice kavanaugh: why not? mr. fleming: because you're talking about a statute that singles out one particular category of civil violations for criminal solicitation liability. why this one particular and not any other civil violations, many of which could be subject to solicitation or incursion without any criminal consequence. many actual federal crimes, there is no general federal cetacean statute. there is only 373, which deals of violence. justice sotomayor: mr. fleming -- cou

. >> i want to tell you gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh. you have released a whirlwind and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> initially, his ranting and raving sounded like a threat of actual violence. one even liberals couldn't defend. >> i am certainly not going to defend what chuck schumerer said want it was wrong, it was inappropriate. it did sound like a physical threat. i think if you look at chuck schumerer's entire record and how he behaves, he does not threaten people physically. >> while schumer's threat wasn't physical. it was in a wake much more corrosive to our republic. he was threatening an issue based impeachment against the two newest member of the high court. if are in other words, if you didn't think about vote figure a n a way that restricts roe v. wade, we will annhiliate you. huge ears was delivering a message to these justices. especially caff few. if joe biden wins the white house. we will turn over every ston in your perjury and professional life and

justices gorsuch and kavanaugh, two of president trump's supreme court picks hearing their first majorion case today involving a challenge to louisiana law that requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital within 30 miles. now senate minority leader chuck schumer is on the receiving end of a rare rebuke from chief justice john roberts for making this threat at a pro-choice rally outside the supreme court today. watch this. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. [cheers] >> martha: incredible moment. joining me now mike davis president of the article 3 project and former law clerk to justice neil gorsuch. mike, good to see you tonight. >> thank you for having me. >> martha: what's your reaction to what senator schumer said there? >> what senator schumer said today at an abortion rally on the steps of the supreme court while the supreme court justices were hearing this abortion case was outrageous. it was entirely inappropriate for senator schumer -- it would be

. >> i want to tell you gorsuch, i want to tell you kavanaugh, you have released the when i will windl pay the price. [cheers and applause] you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. brian: well, now we know. ainsley: justice roberts was not happy about that. he issued a very rare rebuke. you normally don't hear from the justices. they usually try to stay above board. justices know criticism comes with the territory. but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. all members of the court will continue to do their job without fear or favor from whatever quarter. brian: i am not sure if he wrote those comments down because one thing about chuck schumer he is glued to the copy like he has never seen it before, even on the simple police statement he seemed to be ad-libbing that i thought myself he is probably going to come out with an apology and talk about the need for his candidate to win the presidency in order to get a more liberal supreme court, but it wasn't like that at all

basically accusing the senator of threatening gorsuch and kavanaugh.are rebuke, roberts released a statement. this morning senator schumer spoke in front of the supreme court while a case was being argued inside. senator schumer referred to two members of the court by name and wanted to tell them you have released a whirlwind and you will pay the price. you will not know what you hit you if you go forward with the awful decisions. justices know that criticism comes with the territory. but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate. they are dangerous. all members of the court will continue to do their job. without fear or favor from whatever quarter. the rally that schumer attended was held to put pressure on the supreme court to strike down the louisiana law. and protect a woman's right to choose. and that's fine. but schumer's language about the justices was threatening. he said you will pay the price. and you won't know what hit you. those are threatening words. when president trump uses lang

. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind! and you will pay the price! [cheers and applause] you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. trish: did you hear that? he even smiled as he threatened supreme court justices. could we go back and look at that again? see his smile there he knew exactly what he was doing. maybe we should play the tape, let's play that sound bite again for people. here we go. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirl wind, and you will pay the price! [cheers and applause] you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. trish: what kind of sick thoughts were going through his heads to induce a smile at a time like that? with comments like that? and no excuses from him last night, no apology from him last night. supreme court chief justice roberts was forced, for the sake of our country, to issue a rare takedown, writing and i quote: threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of govern

justice gorsuch did not say a word during the oral argument.tice ca kavanaugh commens did withstanding in precedence, nothing to do with abortion. i think that schumer's problem is with the los louisiana legislator. >> one more thing, i think that democrats are teeing it up to be a major issue in the election -- what other issues, if the economy i is on rebound, abortin is a big thing. >> and i want to continue this because, president was tweeting about with holding funds from sanctuary cities, we wrote: where do woo g do we go from he. >> federal government gives cash to city and states there are strings attached much last time, there were no strings attached without cooperating with i.c.e., there are 5 challenges 4 say springs wer -- the strines weret there you cannot add them, fifth one said you can add them because they pertain to public safety, that is law enforcement. but have you a split in circuits, two-thirds of country where something is legal and a 10th it not, supreme court has to resolve it. >> and then terms of back to that first

justice gorsuch didn't say anything about it throughout the entire oral argument.louisiana law which he despises. this recklessness, this personalizing of attacks on the court is extremely damaging. there are nine people in the universe who have the authority to say what the law and what the constitution means. we accept what they say, whether we agree with them or not. we do not threaten them and we do not intimidate them. if we get to threat and intimidation point we will lose respect for law in this country. stuart: that is what it was, intimidation. >> attempted intimidation. i can't imagine it will be successful. but it is an attempt to intimidate. stuart: i'm not in the legal field. you are. have you ever seen anything like this before? >> yes, but i will tell you i have absolutely never seen but the ferocity, immediacy of the response by the chief justice. no chief justice felt the need to do this in the modern era because this was, you will pay for this? he mentions them by name. now is this actionable? is it criminal? can he be prosecuted for it? this is p

gorsuch has never had an abortion decision since he's been on the bench. kavanaugh is clearly someone who would be interested in limiting access to abortion. that's one point. i think perhaps what schumer was doing is echoing the words kavanaugh said in his. canation hearing. you may recall he said since my nomination in july there's been a frenzy on the left to come up with something, anything to block my confirmation. you sewed the wind and they will reap. >> i want to play that back and forth. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. >> you sewed the wind. for decades to come, i feel the whole country will reap the whirlwind. >> you think he's trying to play off of that. >> i suppose so. again, what senator schumer said, kavanaugh, gorsuch, you have released the whirlwind. i don't know what he was saying. we didn't see just now in what he was saying before he got to this point. was he saying states around the country have passed a number of law that restrict access to abo

and justices gorsuch and kavanaugh. you make of the situation, is there a double standard for how the president and chief justice are responding given the fact that president trump has been very critical of justices sotomayor and ginsberg. >> on the one hand, congress is no stranger to fiery rhetoric. this was a speech in front of a charged up crowd. on one hand you could say this was just political speech and it was probably hyperbolic and really ultimately it was very unfortunate. here's why. the words that are key to me are the idea that the justices will pay a price and they will be hit by something. now, even if that isn't necessarily a violence, the reality is the way our government is set up that justices are never hit with any kind of whirlwind or any political price. they are unlike any other person in our government because they are appointed for life. they are supposed to be immune to political pressure. so to make a speech that says that you won't know what hit you, the reality is nothing is going to hit the

>> again, when he said "you will pay a price," he was saying and not you, gorsuch, or you, kavanaugh.ncidentally, use terms, almost exactly what kavanaugh did when he accused senate democrats where he said, "you will reap the whirlwind." now everybody is up in arms by using almost precisely the same words that brett kavanaugh using his senate confirmation hearing. again, what schumer meant is, "you, collectively, you are backers, will feel the consequences if you rule a certain way." >> harris: richard and brendan, i will bring you back later in the hour. thank you very much. after his big super cheesy showing, joe biden can expect to hear a lot more on his son, hunter's, ukraine dealings. ahead, what republican senators are doing and what president trump has to say about it. and passengers on board yet another cruise ship facing a corona virus outbreak, as cases around america continue to grow. the latest, next. ♪ as a struggling actor, i need all the breaks that i can get. at liberty butchumal- cut. liberty biberty- cut. we'll dub it. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so

and maybe these comments against gorsuch and kavanaugh were almost like a threat to their safety. i think that's where he decided to draw the line. but it's going to be difficult because the president doesn't seem like he's going to ease up on these attacks any time soon. remember, the attorney general asked him to stop attacking judges and he continues. so roberts is going to have to draw a really fine line here, and it may not be easy because this term is filled with so many blockbuster cases. >> it's a hallmark of president trump attacking justices. he's been doing it for years now. thank you so much, ariane. >>> emergency room doctors are on the front lines in terms of the coronavirus. i'll speak to one who said he expects to become infected. the impacts that could have on patient care. >>> plus, after pledging to have 1 million coronavirus testing kits available by the end of the week, the trump administration is now saying that is not going to happen. and the wolf huffed and puffed. like you do sometimes, grandpa? well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe. so my do

. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> joining me now, cnn chief legal analyst jeffrey toobin. you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you. those were the words that set off the chief justice who responded, quote, justices know that criticism comes with the territory but threatening statements of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. all members of the court will continue to do their job without fear or favor from whatever quarter. what are we seeing there? >> well, if you parse what chuck schumer said, it was inappropriate. it was not the way you should talk about the supreme court. frankly, no one noticed what he said until roberts intervened. but it was political hyperbole of a sense politicians shouldn't engage in. what's really unusual here is roberts getting involved. when chuck schumer is not exactly the american political figure we think of who usuall

by the way, if the last name gorsuch is familiar to you, ann gorsuch had children, one of whom is on the supreme court. that's an artist's depiction of justice gorsuch's mother, a significant political figure in the '70s and '80s in her own right, although my favorite from "the philadelphia inquirer," just imagine ronald reagan national forest now that james watt has become secretary of the interior. getting us back from politics to standing for a second here, american courts did eventually come up with a kind of solution to the standing problem, all right? over a series of cases, not going to go into -- it's a law and society class so i won't go into doctrine in an excruciating detail. the courts generally did not allow environmental organizations to sue on behalf of trees or even on behalf of themselves as membership groups. but they did start allowing membership organizations to sue on behalf of kind of a specific member who liked to hike or swim in the area under contention. so that member, right, the group representing that member, right, who suffers some damage by having his fa

. >> i want to tell you gorsuch.to tell you kavanaugh you have released the whirlwinds and you will pay the price. >> senator schumer slammed supreme court justice its brett kavanaugh and neil gorsuch over an abortion case in louisiana. he says he was speaking passionately about the issue as the two justices decided to uphold the abortion restrictions. republican senator josh holy is calling for schumer to be censured arguing that was no slip of the tong. >> it is a direct personal threat and he did it again. he did it deliberately. he did this very deliberately. >> i'm pleased and very happy that they didn't pull chuck down to the level where the president will never back off or apologize. >> senator schumer insisted he was not making a threat, but he offered no apology in his statement. the american bar association said it was deeply troubled by the comments of senator schumer. >>> facebook says it's removing a series of re-election ads for president trump. civil rights groups and groups as well as house speaker na

former law clerk to neil gorsuch call schumer's remarks outrageous. >> is would be inappropriate fore to make these comments little on the number one democrat in the united states senate to threaten by name neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh for how they may rule on future cases. rob: john holly plans to issue in motion to pay a political price. the louisiana law would require doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals and a decision is expected in june. >> college admission scandal accusing the university of california of favoring wealthy and influential students, that judge is overseeing lori laughlin's case, they are ordering usc to hand over unredacted emails and document, laughlin and her husband say they were unaware the money did not go toward donations but rather personal bribes to get their kids into usc. look at those pictures. rob: iranian back care group getting help from the very unlikely source, the top-secret information that a defense department worker allegedly handed over to has bola. >> a $500 million a sift by mike bloomberg could

. >> i want you to tell you gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh.ou have released a whirlwind and you will pay the price. trish: republican congressional people elise stefanik says she received a vial, threatening note while grossy shopping over the weekend. the first liberal media hope can the coronavirus will be trump's downfall. >> we have to have some kind of leadership. >> the world is note looking for president trump to lead on this. this may be donald trump's katrina. trish: my next guest doesn't do. things you can do with schwab: you can earn more when you invest your cash. ♪ you can get a satisfaction guarantee. ♪ you can also wonder why our competitors don't offer that. schwab, a modern approach to wealth management. there's a company that's talked than me: jd power.people 448,134 to be exact. they answered 410 questions in 8 categories about vehicle quality. and when they were done, chevy earned more j.d. power quality awards across cars, trucks and suvs than any other brand over the last four years. so on behalf of chevrolet, i want to s

. >> i want you to tell you gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh.ou have released a whirlwind and you will pay the price. trish: republican congressional people elise stefanik says she received a vial, threatening note while grossy shopping over the weekend. the first liberal media hope can the coronavirus will be trump's downfall. >> we have to have some kind of leadership. >> the world is note looking for president trump to lead on this. this may be donald trump's katrina. trish: my next guest doesn't do. ♪ ♪ wherever we want to go, autosave your way there with chase. chase. make more of what's yours. to feel exhilaration. it all starts with an invitation. the invitation to lexus sales event now through march 31st. get 0.9% apr for 60 months on all 2020 models. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. (woman) no matter what business you are in, digital transformation never stops. verizon keeps business ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business... (second man) virtualize their operations... (third man) and could even build

take a listen. >> i want to tell you neil gorsuch is, and kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwindl pay the price. [cheering] you will not know what hit you if you go forward with the awful decisions. >> in dysentery words said these were threatening statements and dangerous. >> this shows the hypocrisy of the left, they have criticized president trump and leslie when he rightly questions the possible objectivity of the judge or disagrees with the decision and here you have a leading democrat, chuck schumer who is threatening justices of the supreme court before the decision. let's be clear what this terrible decision that schumer has worked up a frenzy over in louisiana, louisiana has a law that requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges to a nearby hospital in case something goes wrong with the abortion, something to help save the lives of the woman. and yet chuck schumer disagrees with that, why is that, they say they care about women's health but the truth is they don't give a you know what about women's health. all the democrats care about is making sur

howie: chief justice john roberts scolded chuck schumer to what sounded like a threat to neil gorsuch brett kavanaugh. some coverage on cnn and more coverage on fox. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you kavanaugh, you have released a world-wind and you will pay the price. [cheers and applause] >> you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. howie: roberts declared that threatening statements from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate but dangerous. the uproar led to dueling statements from the leaders on the floor. >> at the very best comments were astonishing reckless and completely irresponsible. >> i shouldn't have used the words i did but in no way i was making a threat. >> it was inappropriate, it did sound like a physical threat. >> i'm sure mitch mcconnell is going to criticize chuck schumer for what he said. he will attack donald trump for past 3 and a half and acting federal judges. >> there have been examples of this president and the previous president criticizing members of the supreme court, criticizing ruli

it's the first abortion case to face the supreme court since the arrival of justices kavanaugh and gorsuch a planned parenthood rally outside the high court, senate minority showed up and chuck schumer made this threat against the trump appointed justices. >> i want to tell you, i want to tell you kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. [cheering] you will know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. lou: ignorance at its worst. schumer, and exclude vocal. chief justice roberts, a statement in response to the comments. he said this, threatening statements of this sort from the highest level of government not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. all members of the court will continue to do their job without fear or favor from whatever court order. i'll vote and tonight paul, the question is, should chuck schumer be held accountable for his outrageous threats against justices kavanaugh and gorsuch, find that they will pay the price? cast your vote on twitter at lou dobbs. we'd like to hear from you. michael bloomberg has dropped out of the

talking about an abortion case, directing those comments directly to justices brett kavanaugh and gorsuchstice and a letter. justices know that criticism comes with the territory, but threatening statements of the sort with the highest of government are not only inappropriate but dangerous. all members of the court will continue to do their job without favor from whatever court. chuck schumer spokesperson responded saying women's health care rights are at stake. americans from every corner of the country are in english but what the court might do to them. justice roberts two deliver misinterpretation of what chuck schumer said or means i with president trump's attack. and last week, shows justice roberts does not just call balls and strikes. so let's begin there with the panel. bill mcgurn bill mcgurn, columnist for "the wall street journal," mollie hemingway senior analyst and congressman harold ford jr. currently chairman of -- bill, thoughts on this. >> i thought it was a crude attack, but i actually got the response was worse. this cockamamie idea that roberts had got it wrong. he is

he has retired now on the bench are justices gorsuch and vanaugh.idered in the middle here. vhe asked questioy similar of all the lawyers who argued today. and that really probethe extent of the 2016 decisron and how coing it has to be. he asked, can we do a fact by fact inquiry of each state law to determine whether this kind of a requirement as a medical benefit? because in that 2016 decision, the supreme court said that texas requirement had no medical benefit. >> that admitting privileges did not affect the health of women. >> and that in fact it could hurt it and was unduly enbume, which is the test for constitutionality of abortion restrictions today. then there also was just the merits of having a 30-mile race -- requirement for hospital privileges. pointed out, if a woman hasr complications from an abortion and she said those complications are extremely rare, she is going to have it after the abortion, at home, and if she needs to go to a hospital, she is going to go to a cal hospital. louisiana's lawyer claims there are benefits a yes the c

it's a big test for president trump's picks, justices neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh. outside the court, senate minority leader chuck schumer with a heated warning. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you, if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> so, let's bring in terry moran tonight. and terry, because the chief justice john roberts delivering a rare rebuke late today to senator schumer. >> reporter: that's right, david. a sharp and extraordinary rebuke , eusticele ago, threatening highest levelse, they are dangerous. all members of the court will continue to do their job without fear or favor from what quarter. now, senator schumer's office fired back, claiming that the senaalngut thepriceha senate republicans would face. whatever the case, chief justice roberts has previously rebuked president trump when he went after a federal judge of mexican dissent. the chief justice trying to protect the court in these difficult times and that is tough. david?

as a consequence of the last presidential election, that's how you end up with neil gorsuch, and brettr jobs, but certainly as you point out whether you are in congress or a member of the media, call it accurately if you want to go there. it was a threat, there is no acceptable excuse, no acceptable explanation for it. you can't cut it any other way, it was a threat. >> raymond: is congress matt gaetz was saying, i think he fears losing the supreme court. i want her reaction to the outcome of the coronavirus yesterday "the new york times" reported that on monday the cdc appeared to have removed figures on the agency website counting how many americans had been tested. congressman gates, very quickly. have they told congress why they are doing this? >> yes, because we have democratized access to testing to the state level, we are actually doing a great deal more testing now and keeping that data in real-time on the cdc website is less productive than having states do the testing and the reporting. >> raymond: congressman, thank you both. we will catch up with you soon. coming up, americ

apology after doubling down on his comments about his threats against supreme court justices neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh. a sitting senator threatening the supreme court justices. this is an unprecedented attack and it wasn't just senator schumer who attack the justiced yesterday. we have the update. to the secret fisa surveillance court, saying to congress, hey, if you won't punish fbi officials and hold them accountable we will. fisa court banning and blocking from its courts the fbi agents who deceived and misled it to get fisa surveillance warrants to spy on the trump campaign. you won't believe what we found. senator elizabeth warren stops her campaign. nancy pelosi says there is quote an element of misogyny here. the debate. did nancy pelosi criticize her own party and democrat voters? we have growing concerns about joe biden's seemingly never-ending waterfall of flubs and gaffs. we have even more new examples. this debate, candidate biden weaker than candidate hillary clinton? results that we've got tonight. plus, why exactly did this massive brawl break out in turkey's parlia

leader mitch mcconnell speaks out on sunder chuck schumer's comments about supreme court justices neil gorsuchett kavanaugh. comments the chief justice called threatening and dangerous. as critics from across the political spectrum call schumer out, will ask senator mcconnell how the senate plans to handle it. and how they trump administration coronavirus response in the billions in fundings lawmakers sent to the president's desk. our exclusive minutes away. a cruise ship with no confirmed cases of coronavirus cannot find a welcoming port. locals functionin launching rocr gas, please getting involved. we will tell you where this is and what is happening to those on board. hello, welcome to "fox news @ night." i'm shannon bream in washington. we will get to mitch mcconnell in a minute, but first, kevin corke sets us up with the president's view on the supreme court justice and more, town hall tonight. >> quite a townhouse town hall,wide-ranging conversat town hall of the 2020 election title, not just touching a may 2020 race with but also thef course, the coronavirus peer to >> it's went to wor

he says i you want to tell you gorsuch, and i want to tell you kavanaugh by name.lease a whirlwind and you will pay the price. you will not know what hit you if you go forward with awful decisions. to one has indicated how they will vote in this case. he had a lot to say. the chief justice rarely speaks publicly. he put out a statement in parted threatening statements from this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate, they are dangerous. he was not having it. now, schumer's folks have responded and said he was referencing the political price that senate republican also pay, not everyone is buying that including folks over in senator ben sasse's office said you named them, those are not the names of senators. you said gorsuch and kavanaugh. so it's stirring up a hornet's mess tonight in d.c. tucker? >> tucker: i mean, that's an ominous thing to say. i'm assuming he wasn't threatening violence. you always give people the benefit of the doubt. what do you think he was talking about? is there any indication? >> really the only option that

. >> i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind andl pay the price. >> of course, i didn't intend to suggest anything other than political and public opinion consequences for the supreme court and it is a gross distortion to apply otherwise. >> dana: let's bring in erin holly from the independent women's law it is aer. her husband is josh hawley from missouri. i'll read to you from your former boss. >> now take a quick listen to senator mcconnell. >> the minority leader threatened two associate justices from the supreme court, period. at the very best, his comments were astonishingly reckless and completely irresponsible. >> dana: way back when, i was a spokesperson for john roberts when he worked his way to become a supreme court justice. he's reticent to get in the middle of politics but he felt compelled to last night. >> yes. this is a highly unusual statement by the chief justice. as you know, the supreme court decides cases. it does not often or really ever issue public statements. but the chief justice felt strongly about the sa

we just saw the clip, he said gorsuch, he said kavanaugh. he said you'll pay the price. by the way, almost identical to what donald trump said about adam schiff a couple of months ago, which was he has not paid the price yet. both of those things are are irresponsible. i don't know how mitch mcconnell can condemn one but not the other. they're both on equal footing. >> to you covering the supreme court, what do you make of the fact that chief justice john roberts did speak up on this? >> it's really interesting to see when it is the chief justice chooses to use his megaphone. he very rarely makes these kinds of public statements. he did not speak last week when trump sate sotomayor and ginsburg should recuse themselves. trump did not use threatening language. he said justice ginsburg should resign. that said, you know, two wrongs do not make a right. >> you can understand why -- and i appreciate you pointing out the nuance, but why people are saying, well, how is it okay for you to jump in and help your conservative colleagues today and not to those two -- the liberal ju

just as justty kennedy is keyhe, etired, now on the bench areum appointees gorsuch and kavanaugh.roberts is in the middle and of all the lawyers arguesimilar today and that really probed the extent of the 2016 decisn and how controlling it has to be. he asked, you know, can we do a fact-by-fact inquiry of each state law to detne whether this kind of requirement has a medical benefit because, in at 2016 decision, the supreme court said that texaquirement had no medical benefit.ti >> the adm privileges did not affect the health of the women -- >> exactly, and, in fact, it could hurt it, and wa unduly burdensome, which is the test for constitutiolity of abortion restrictions today. and then there also was just the merits of having 30-mile restriction -- or reqrement for hospital privileges. justice ginsburg, in particular, poted out, if a woman has complications from an abortion and she id thse complications are extremely rare, she's going abortion, after the at home, and if she needs to go to a hospital, she's going to go to a local hospital.w louisiana's r claims that there are ben

i don't know whether he was talking about impeaching justice gorsuch or justice kavanaugh, i don't knowthe court, but it was inappropriate, and it's beneath senator schumer. and i hope he apologizes. >> shannon: senator, do you feel like in this time of a lot of heated rhetoric, do you feel there is room for bipartisanship on things like the coronavirus spending and other things that require the attention of our lawmakers? d think there's any spirit of getting things done lette that e important to the american people? >> yes, tomorrow we are going to pass a supplement spending bill to fight coronavirus. the a administration asked for $2.5 billion. we are going to give the administration more money. i'm a fiscal conservative, shannon. i'm driven all over washington, d.c., and i can't find the money tree. this is taxpayer money we're spending spending, but this is no time to be cheap. we are not all going to die, but this is a serious virus, for which we don't have an antiviral agent. we are developing one. a vaccine and therapeutics, and we need to spend what we need to spend here. the f

dog offered a week apology for his threats against supreme court justices, brett kavanaugh and neil gorsuchuage. i should not have used the words i did but in no way was i making a threat, i never would do such a thing and leader mcconnell knows that and republicans who were busy manufacturing outrage over these comments know that too. lou: let me be clear, i'm not outraged about it at all. i think he looks like a fool, the man has never been in a fistfight, he plays a thug from new york and then winds for forgiveness. and that the way they do it in brooklyn, i am from texas and that makes me plainspoken as well, mr. minority leader. perhaps a little stronger than mr. schumer. i would have this thought for him, you're awful, you're ignorant and you're an absolute disgrace to the bronx. joining me now former reagan white house clinical director and fox business political analyst ed rollins. good to have you. you can be plainspoken as well. are you impressed that he was a thug on one day and a whining cower on thcoward on the neck. >> keeper into members of the supreme court and warned them i

eporter: yes, chuck schumer commented about justice gorsuch saying [inaudible] mr. mccarthy: i don't think you should take this lightly. it and where they said it. we have three co-equal branches. we had the leader of the democrats in the senate standing ver the supreme court, i believe, before the supreme court is going to hear a case two new judges. threatening them. mincing his his -- words. being cheered by it. that. so much better than i don't care if it was a republican or democrat doing it. it's unacceptable and it is a low. it's inappropriate. it goes beyond just an apology. that what he really meant? we know chuck schumer. he's been a member of congress. senator for quite sometime. and he's been a leader. inappropriate, but to take it to that level, it almost brings a threat not only those members of the supreme ourt to others, for others to act. i don't know if democrats want to change their leadership over t, but i've heard some talk about it. so i wouldn't -- i would -- from just andpoint of censuring, i think there are other actions that could take plac

and then the senior senator from new york said this -- i want to tell you, gorsuch, i want to tell you, kavanaugh, you've released a whirlwind and you, you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions, end quote. madam president, i'm not sure where to start. there is nothing to call this exception a threat, and there is absolutely no question to whom, to whom it was directed. contrary to what the democratic leader has since tried to claim, he very, very clearly was not addressing republican lawmakers or anyone else. he literally directed the statement to the justices by name, and he said, quote, if you go forward with these awful decisions, which could only apply to the court itself. the minority leader of the united states senate threatened two associate justices of the u.s. supreme court, period. there's no other way to interpret that. even worse, the threat was not clearly political or institutional. as i'll discuss in a moment, these kinds of threats are sadly nothing new from senate democrats. this was much broader, much broader. the

he did not mean to threaten neil gorsuch or brett kavanaugh. todd: a contest to name a mars rover.chose the name perseverance. >> we are in species of explorers and there will be setbacks on the way to mars but we can persevere. not as a nation but as humans we will not give up. the human race will always persevere into the future. >> the virginia middle school or won the naming contest out of 28,000 students, the $2 billion perseverance rover will launch into space this summer. that is really cool. i am sure he will celebrate this weekend. todd: speaking of somebody the weekend. carley: i wore my pants inside out this morning and getting changed in the dark. >> 20s and 30s across the map and i was putting away most of my winter clothing yesterday. you know what will happen across the northeast? snow. i am batting 0 right now. past 24 hours, snow across the great lakes and a coastal event will bring a little bit of snow to coastal new england. it will clip the coasts but it will bring the colder temperatures down and we could see snow across long island and cape cod. there is your

gorsuch, kavanaugh, you will pay the price. you went know what hit you and that's a threat.d them by name. chuck schumer yesterday, you know, the day before his spokesperson had this laughable excuse well, he was talking about senate republicans. he didn't mention senate republicans. it is so clear yesterday that chuck schumer made a mistake he should just apologize. instead he said, you know what? i misspoke but he did not apologize. so, it will be interesting to see. we saw mitch mcconnell right there. is mitch mcconnell going to sign on to censuring the senate minority leader because josh hawley and a dozen other republicans are. where will mitch be, you can't go talking like that about people on the supreme court. jedediah: he also comes out schumer and says i'm from brooklyn. you know what? i'm from brooklyn. that's not an excuse. i'm sorry. listen, you don't talk that wait a minute i understand what he was trying to say but you don't speak that way about supreme court justices. i would like to know what he is talking about when he says political. even his justification

. >> i want to tell you, neil gorsuch, brett cavanagh, you have released a whirlwind and you will payce. >> grossed of conservatives calling for the democratic leader to be sensors it. rachel joins us live next. introducing a single sports destination, where you can find games, news and highlights. all in one place, right on your tv. the new xfinity sports zone. use your voice to search every stat and score. follow the teams you love. and get notifications when the game's about to start, with the xfinity sports zone, everybody wins. now that's simple, easy, awesome. say "xfinity sports zone" into your voice remote today. can you help keep these iguys protected online?? easy, connect to the xfi gateway. what about internet speeds that keep up with my gaming? let's hook you up with the fastest internet from xfinity. what about wireless data options for the family? of course, you can customize and save. can you save me from this conversation? that we can't do, but come in and see what we can do. we're here to make life simple. easy. awesome. ask. shop. discover. at your local xfinity sto

. >> i want to tell you, neil gorsuch, brett kavanaugh, you have released a whirlwind and you will pay the price. you won't know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions. >> that prompt response from chief justice john roberts, justices know the criticism comes with the territory but threatening states of this sort from the highest levels of government are not only inappropriate but dangerous. all members of the court will do their job without fear or favor from whatever quarter. a spokesman for schumer cities comments were a reference to the political fight senate republicans will play for putting these justices on the court and morning the justices will unleash a major grassroots movement on the issue of reproductive rights against the decision. senator john kennedy, republican from louisiana joins us. what do you make of those comments? >> you can only be young once but you can always be immature. i'm very disappointed in senator schumer's comments, they were juvenile, they were infantile, they were sophomoric, they were clearly a threat. i don't know whether he mea

. >> i want to tell you neil gorsuch and brett kavanaugh you have released a whirlwind and you will pay united states and a friend to associate justices of the supreme court period. >> i am from brooklyn. we speak in strong language. i shouldn't of use the words i did but in no way was i making a threat. >> joining me with comments on this capitol hill controversy, senior legal advisor jenna ellis. thank you for joining us with what you make of this. what was your opinion when you heard what he was saying? >> i couldn't believe it. this is absolutely inappropriate and potentially illegal of chuck schumer to make these very clear threats against these two specific supreme court justices and absolutely unlawful to make a specific threat or even intimidated justice or judge to have the outcome of the case that you prefer. anyone can fairly comment or disagree with an opinion or have strong opinions on a case. this was very particular language directed to two specific individual saying you will pay the price of fuel in a certain way. not only should schumer be censured but this is borderlin