>> i believe six minutes. >> that you think. i have no further questions. >> mr. >> good morning, sergeant stiger. thank you for being here. did you enjoy the rain last night? >> yes. >> a little different than california. >> yes, we don't get that much in california. >> right. sergeant, i have a few questions first and foremost about your experience. have you ever previously testified in any court or in any or federal court as an expert on the police use of force? >> no i have not. >> have you ever been qualified by any court as an expert in the use of police force? >> yes. >> where? >> in los angeles during a trial use of force that i was the investigator for. >> is that the only time in that case? >> yes. >> and you are here in your own personal capacity? >> correct. >> you are not here as a representative of either the los angeles police department or officer of inspector general? >> correct. >> the training that you have experienced and that you have conducted, that has all been by the los angeles police department, correct? >> yes. >> so the training that yo

so, i believe it is highly relevant. i do not believe it is hearsay in the sense of you don't hear anything essentially very little that the officers say. the officers don't talk about what just happened over there with one small exception, relevant to mr. williams and ms. hanson, there are some comments there. i believe that part may already be in, in one of the other body cameras. i'd have to go back and double check. that being said, your honor, i don't think it's cumulative because it again shows a different perspective. it shows a reaction of another police officer and what he was doing. it shows the surroundings from a different perspective, and is highly relevant to the effect. >> i haven't read the entire thumb drive that contains the exhibit. and i do find that it is relevant and not cumulative to a certain point. i would note that the body cam includes video from a distance what is happening in front of cup foods. but also the timing of when the fire engine 17 shows up. and since the emergency ems response has b

i believe the phone call was shortly. just as concluded yes who is that phone call from i received a phone call from sergeant kluger who was the midwatch sergeant. do you recall what sergeant or let me back up did sergeant give you information you relied upon to take further steps in your duties that i yes. what did sergeant hooter tell you. surgeon who informed me that he was at the hospital at that time and he was with a male that he described may or may not live. later on the night i found out that mail was mr floyd. he said he was down there at the hospital he asked me if i would be willing to respond to. the instant location of 30 inches hole. because he was tired of hospital at the time he asked me if i would respond down there just to make sure just in case we had to secure the area and make contact with any of his officers that were were there on scene so because this was a had the potential to be a possible critical and can you describe what you mean by critical it's. usually an instant and then also involve incid

>> i believe it was federal bureau of investigation and/or u.s. attorney, a lot of these took place over video calls and i wasn't entirely sure who but i believe it was those two groups, yes. >> that occurred july 8 of 2020? >> to the best of my recollection, yes. >> were you asked those questions? and were you able to form an opinion on the involvement of law officers whether mr. floyd died under these circumstances? [inaudible] >> not legal standards of the diagnosis. >> i'll answer the question, earlier i mentioned there were multiple people on the video calls and if at some.there was more than one person asking questions of the time, i don't normally think of things in that paradigm, perhaps that is a legal thing but it's not normally i think of as a toxicologist so i clarified the investigation was my opinion as to what happened to mr. floyd and that is he experienced cardiopulmonary arrest in the context of restraint and neck compression. the rest of the interaction took him over the edge given his underlying heart disease. that was also clar

>> i believe so. schleicher: this is a critical incident would be handed over to bureau of criminal apprehension? >> at that point we still didn't know this would be a critical incident. i was going under the assumption it's better safe to go that way than not. schleicher: because of that, there were steps taken to ensure when this was handed off it would be handed off in a manner to be smooth. either dale or zimmerman make a suggestion to you about. [inaudible] >> yes. they said the crime scene market started and i started an officer with that task. it is a log of names of officers and personnel that into the crime scene. schleicher: did you see officer to start compiling the crime scene log? >> yes. schleicher: exhibit 89. you can see the officer here. >> yes. schleicher: he appears to be holding something. >> yes. schleicher: a crime scene log? >> i believe so. schleicher: you testified at some point you learn that mr. floyd had died. correct? >> yes do you recall how you receive that information qu

i don't believe so, no. and when _ responding officers. i don't believe so, no. you are trained - so, no. and when you arrived and got out, i assume you are trained to - out, i assume you are trained to assess the situation correct? and you did that as you are getting out of your squad car? yes. and when you did that, did you hear officer king asked mr floyd for his name? i did. asked mr floyd for his name? i did, es. and asked mr floyd for his name? i did, yes- and you _ asked mr floyd for his name? i did, yes. and you heard _ asked mr floyd for his name? i did, yes. and you heard mr _ asked mr floyd for his name? i did, yes. and you heard mr floyd - asked mr floyd for his name? i did, yes. and you heard mr floyd given l yes. and you heard mr floyd given his full name? _ yes. and you heard mr floyd given his full name? spell _ yes. and you heard mr floyd given his full name? spell it? _ yes. and you heard mr floyd given his full name? spell it? yes. - yes. and you heard mr floyd given his full name? spell it? yes. and | his full name? spell it? yes. and his full

for your job as a firefighter i believe i believe it is a certification ok so are you currently certified as an e.m.t. yes it happens when you choose an employment right now are you up to date on all of the. certification requirements yes ma'am to my knowledge and again based on what you were describing for training for firefighters is that part of the sort of standard training fat firefighters meaning are they all aunties and many of the many of us yes i'm ok. i'm going to get back to your day to day as a as a captain with minneapolis fire department what are your job duties to which level of being it is simply put i'm in charge of maintaining the care and care and treatment and trading of my crew our quick moment and our station. which is a broad which is broad but then within that i am in charge of ensuring that we are called city rules regulations have appropriate interactions with the public work well with other agencies maintain our training i'm in charge of all documentation records and then on all of our calls i'm in charge of the overall safety and well being of our crew and sure

i believe these sanctions imposed on russia are appropriate, and i also know as the president said, the a stable relationship with russia. i think we need a functional relationship with russia but russia does not really want conflict with the united states, and i believe there is discussion about with the imposition of the sanctions whether president putin would still want to meet with the u.s. president? of course he would, because it is to his benefit, but when we look at cyber attacks, potential interference in our election, i believe the economic sanctions and removal of the diplomats who were basically russian spies is an appropriate response. anchor: congresswoman, you sit on the intelligence committee. you are privy to information about what is happening internally and russia. these sanctions targeting ability of russia to borrow money. is that something you think could change the behavior of president putin potentially? >> i certainly think the aggression in crime era -- crimea is a major reason for the sanctions imposed, and economic sanctions could be particularly detrimental

>> i believe he told me they tried to put mr. oyd -- i did know his time name of the time, he was combative, i think he mentioned he entered either his nose or mouth, a bloody clip i think and eventually after struggling with him, he suffered a medical emergency and an ambulance was called and head to the scene. >> is that the extent of what you remember the defendant telling you about. >> i think that was basically it. >> did he tell you whether he personally applied any particular type of force or restraint to mr. floyd? >> i don't believe so. >> did he tell you whether or not or other officers pinned mr. floyd to the ground? >> i think the conversation he said something about held somebody down. >> did he mention anything about putting his knee on his neck or back? >> no. >> is the placement of a knee on a subject neck a use of force? >> yes. >> a reportable type of force? >> not necessarily. >> why is that? >> handcuffing somebody in a prone position or fighting with somebody can have your knee on the neck. >> for about how lo

i believe that's maybe a parked police squad to my left. four people outside, one of whom is off-duty firefighter hanson and i did not recognize her walking through. >> do you recognize her now? >> affirmative. >> you can use the stylious or your finger. can you indicate where you are in this photo as well? all right. there's an arrow showing where you just made that mark. could you identify jennifer hall as well. did you know any other individuals in this? >> in this photo, no, ma'am. >> if we could move to exhibit 71, please. i'm sorry. 72, please. so did you ultimately enter the store and have a brief interaction, as you described, with a law enforcement officer in there? >> yes, ma'am. >> does exhibit 72 show that? i should be more clear. what does exhibit 72 show? >> i believe it would be the body camera of the officer with whom we were speaking. >> who is pictured in this image? >> i am in the center and firefighter hall is to the right. >> was this inside cup foods? >> yes, ma'am, towards the back of the store. >> all right. and as yo

i'm genuinely optimistic because so much is beginning to happen because i believe in our ingenuity, i know president biden does, he believes we can do anything. think about it. we are the country that went to the mood and we did not know how we were going to get there. where the country that invented the internet. some people might regret that today but we did that. we also vaccines that are working and we have shown we have the ability to put that out and put them and people's arms so i believe that we have the ability. when you talk to the president of m.i.t. and what they are trying to do at m.i.t. or at stanford or at caltech or other tech colleges, if we were to join forces with other efforts around the world, we think there are great opportunities and i believe we are going to breakthrough. there's plenty of hydrogen and this i think is really the future. this is why many people are chasing it. >> contact information for his team. >> there have been some groups that have been really positive about the ndc and other steps you have taken but there also some who are saying it is in

i firmly believe that only. and i firmly believe that only when — and i firmly believe that only whenve that only when black lives matter, - and i firmly believe that only. when black lives matter, then all tives — when black lives matter, then all lives will _ when black lives matter, then all lives will matter. _ when black lives matter, then all lives will matter. 0k, - all lives will matter. ok, thanks _ all lives will matter. ok, thanks. let's _ all lives will matter. ok, thanks. let's go - all lives will matter. ok, thanks. let's go now- all lives will matter. ok, thanks. let's go now to l thanks. let's go now to singapore to carma elliott for her question. what do you want to ask? i her question. what do you want to ask? ., ., ., a to ask? i want to ask the panelists _ to ask? i want to ask the panelists how _ to ask? i want to ask the panelists how and - to ask? i want to ask the panelists how and why i to ask? i want to ask the panelists how and why is j to ask? i want to ask the - panelists how and why is black lives _ panelists how and why is black lives matter— panelists h

>> i believe that night i only had about a ten officers on. i didn't have every single one on the scene biden had the 911 calls but i didn't have the 911 calls. schleicher: what do you recall did you secure. >> officers king and lane as well as mr. floyd's vehicle. schleicher: described the vehicle please. >> i do not the call what type he was driving. it was dark. schleicher: did you keep officers king and lane out of squad 320? >> yes i did. i told them to leave their belongings inside the squad car. schleicher: exhibit 84. for the record a photo from your body worn camera from 2150, 15 seconds. is that right quick. >> those king and lane in the photo. >> yes. schleicher: this is the initial interaction to get out of the vehicle to secure and they complied? >> they did. schleicher: did you see anyone take anything out of the vehicle? >> now - - no. schleicher: was the vehicle running or stopped quick. >> it was running. i told them to get out of the car. they got out of the car. schleicher: did you tell them to stop the vehicle? >> not intel

>> i believe, i cannot believe i don't remember i believe my partner said it first over the radio. nelson: that is when fire is dispatched and they went to cup foods first quick. >> i heard that afterwards. nelson: you did not know that at the time. >> no. as we were moving to 36 them park i went over the radio and told dispatch we would be moving and have fire ems they are. nelson: the information you have as you were initially responding is there was a mouth injury. correct? >> there was information the mail may be intoxicated or impaired. >> yes. there were some notes about, i cannot remember the exact wording but something about substance use or i cannot remember if it said narcotic or substance use concerned. there was a note to say he was on top of the vehicle. nelson: you remember seeing that in the computer aided dispatch quick. >> i saw that later. or my partner would have seen that. nelson: and then the result of information that police have history floyd restrained on the ground. nelson: there is a note that popped up right as we were arriving. i don't recall if it was re

, i believe. then it was updated. >> you say updated, was it just any code three? >> affirmative. >> without supplemental information as to why? >> i don't believe so. >> ultimately, did you respond to the area of cut foods? >> yes. >> and what did you do when you arrived there? >> .-dot rigg estopped. my partner and i got off the rig and we looked around for a patient. >> when you got there, what did you see? >> there were several police squads, one police and i believe two or three minneapolis police cars that i remember parked in the vicinity in the area. a couple of officers were standing on the street and a couple people-- a handful of people were outside. >> was there an ambulance there at the time you were there? >> no ma'am. >> were you able to identify a patient upon arrival? >> no ma'am. there was known on the street. >> so what did you do next? >> we basically went clockwise around the rig and i spoke police officer and then we went into the store. >> and did you come into contact with

>> i believe, i cannot believe i don't remember i believe my partner said it first over the radio. nelson: that is when fire is dispatched and they went to cup foods first quick. >> i heard that afterwards. nelson: you did not know that at the time. >> no. as we were moving to 36 them park i went over the radio and told dispatch we would be moving and have fire ems they are. nelson: the information you have as you were initially responding is there was a mouth injury. correct? >> there was information the mail may be intoxicated or impaired. >> yes. there were some notes about, i cannot remember the exact wording but something about substance use or i cannot remember if it said narcotic or substance use concerned. there was a note to say he was on top of the vehicle. nelson: you remember seeing that in the computer aided dispatch quick. >> i saw that later. or my partner would have seen that. nelson: and then the result of information that police have history floyd restrained on the ground. nelson: there is a note that popped up right as we were announcer: friday feature testimony f

i don't believe it's page 2. and i like the three bullets. this is from the minneapolis police department use of force policy and procedure manual five Ã300 series. >> yes. >> you see the different factors here that you testified about, true? >> yes. >> you've already spokento the severity of the private issue . did that change during the restraint period ? >> no. the crime was still mister floyd was in possession of a fake $20 bill. >> i'd like you to focus on the second factor, whether mister floyd posed an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others at the time during the restraint period. >> he did not. >> he was in a prone position, handcuffed and not resisting. he was not attempting to kick, punch or anything of that nature . >> did you ever communicate and intent to do so? >> i did not hear any verbalization of any threats towards the officers. >> did he ever indicate whether he had the ability to do so after mark. >> know he did not. >> can you comment as to the number of other officers on the scene present at the time an

i believe you indicated mr. floyd was offering resistance initially outside of the vehicle, is that right? >> yes, outside and inside the vehicle. >> and then however there was a time -- >> all of our previous days coverage available at c-span.org. we will take you live to minneapolis with a testament of jody stiger, lapd use force expert is expected to continue the eighth day of the trial of derek chauvin. >> will do a brief recap to bring us to where we left off yesterday. yesterday you testified about some events that occurred that took place on may 25, 2020, prior to the defendants arrival. and then some events immediately upon his arrival, isn't right? >> yes. >> you testified that mr. floyd reluctance and resistance to get in the squad car and officers efforts to compel them to do so, is that right? >> yes. >> he then discussed how officers holding back out of the squad car onto the street. i believe you indicated mr. floyd went to his knees on the ground, said thank you to the officers, is that right? >>

so i do believe that it is highly relevant. i do not believe that it's hearsay in the sense that we don't hear anything, very little of the officers say, the officers don't talk about what just happened over there with a small exception relevant to mr. williams and ms. hanson, i believe that part they are to be part of it then i would have to go back and doublecheck. that being said, i don't think it'sbe cumulative because it dos show the reaction of another police officer in woody's doing from a different perspective and it is highly relevant. >> i do find that it's relevant and not cumulative to a certain point. i would note that the body camera included, the video from a distance, what is happening the timing of when they show up. so when the ems response has been a part of this, clarifying how they would be within three minutes and so that is relevant as well to the extent that there's any statements made or to the extent that they are, they fall under the residual exceptions and there is an ability for them to be reliable a

derek chauvin right knee. >> i believe i did yes. >> and when mr. derek chauvin stood up, mr. george floyd arm sort of came up, right. >> may i again please pretty. >> sure. >> just hit back ten seconds and then start printed. [inaudible]. [inaudible]. >> it is hard. let's try one more time. [inaudible]. [inaudible]. >> can you see that predict. >> what was the question predict. >> do you observe mr. george floyd right knee i'm sorry, derek chauvin writing compressing mr. george floyd left arm pretty. >> so from what i see that mr. derek chauvin shin as he was actually on his back pretty. >> that is what you believe you see. okay. but nevertheless, mr. george floyd left arm in the tri-state area, was in between mr. derek chauvin either me or shed, right. >> yes. >> did you review and study the body worn cameras closely yourself. >> i reviewed them closely, yes. >> and if you to understand and hear what various parties were saying at various times. >> yes. >> did you ever hear mr. george floyd say that i ate too any drugs. >> no. [inaudible]. [inaudible]. >> i would like to pub

>> i t believe so. >> and the testimony of the 911 operator was she heard screaming and scuffling or some sort of a noise that prompted her to dispatch a second car.pr >> i didn't hear her testimony. >> but officers do get the radio traffic. they do hear all of the communication among all of the heofficers. >> correct. >> and to rely on that information. >> right. >> if you are in officer and you hear a scuffle on the radio, you here we are taking one out and you get dispatch code three or emergent situation, reasonable for an officer to come in with a heightened sense of alertness. >> absolutely. >> and you responded to these calls thousands of times. so now you have an officer, aer reasonable officer would have a heightened sense of concern about this call. >> correct. >> so, when officer chauvin arrived at 8:13 he knew some degree of force was being used because what he heard on the dispatch, presumably, correct? >> correct. >> he knew other officers were there. he knew he was being dispatched back to the situation. he knew that the individual suspect was possibly impaired, right?

>> i was checking and monitoring the patient and i believe i saw a pulse and that was a differential go rhythm for my protocol and that indicates defibrillation which i provided. >> when did you detect pulses electrical activity? >> en route to hennepin medical center. >> and i think you just said that is a shockable rhythm per your protocols? >> yes. pulses is a shockable protocol. >> you -- what made you notice the change? in terms of the we periodically >> and was the lucas device giving compressions. >> the lucas device was giving compressions at the time. >> initially he was in asystole and you at some point saw on the monitor that there was the possibility of pulses electrical activity, is that right? >> correct. we would pause lucas, do a pulse check. it looked like a rhythm check with the pulses, and i elected to defibrillate that and he remained on his quote, unquote, dead state and we continued on with the cardiac arrest. >> and so just to be clear, i mean, when someone is in the state that you're describing, are you looking for any opportunity to administer a shock or prov

on top of that i believe we can restructure the budget lords. which had been granted to jugs last year. but. the facts simply respond to the but that make it was i think there's a fair thing to do. with let me remind you that these loans are to be paid off to. july the 1st i believe we can extend the deadline the words that they will be doing that. all the year to all the way to the year 2020 died will have a lot more time. to start showing these debts will be with him in the way it is the machinations to increase the. capabilities of these regions so that they will be able to work on their own will be getting into the regions of russia in new. instrument to achieve greater levels of prosperity these are infrastructure but the state laws are good though and each restraint will be not be more than 3 percent the deadline 15 years. you should want to do. and of the 2023 will be. granting you mean you will do you want. 5b5cb rubles worth of search. to start showing the debts. and we need to do that on a fair value system the fair and just basis. whil

the dates i believe the i 23rd to the 25th of april, correct?april, correct? that's correct. ., ., ., that's correct. you have enough time to net that's correct. you have enough time to get everything _ that's correct. you have enough time to get everything ready _ that's correct. you have enough time to get everything ready for _ that's correct. you have enough time to get everything ready for those - to get everything ready for those dates? ~ �* ., , ~ to get everything ready for those dates? ~ �* ., , . ., to get everything ready for those dates? ~ �* . ., , dates? we're hopeful. we have been roducin: dates? we're hopeful. we have been producing open-air _ dates? we're hopeful. we have been producing open-air cinema _ dates? we're hopeful. we have been producing open-air cinema events i dates? we're hopeful. we have been| producing open-air cinema events for producing open—air cinema events for the last 12 years, we're very experienced. i get the sense that everyone the government are working with to put these test events on the top of their

i believe work is underway to address your concern. >> i hope it is ambassador. we don't wreck provisions of law to have the be ignored. i helped previous administrations to the same standards as the ranking member. i will hold this administration to the same standard. the purpose of the affirmation is to be able to be informed so members can make decisions on what u.s. policy should be. i broke this position of the ndaa to gain insight as congress conducts oversight of the agreement. i didn't write the agreement with the expectation the administration would ignore it. i expect them to comply with the law and i hope you will make sure this complaint takes place from your role since they will call upon you for the insight to make that report. do i have your commitment to work to try and get to us sooner rather than later? >> as i said senator, we understand the importance of what you have stated and we are working with your team to respond very quickly. >> let's put it this way. if i don't get the report, there will be no forthcoming from this committee. >> unders

>> i believe late march. >> so because of that, quarantined for a while? >> yes, he was already quarantining but also then had covid. >> thank you, that's the only question i had. [background noises] [background noises] >> good morning missus ross. >> good morning. >> thank you for being with us this morning. i'm sorry about your struggles with opioid addiction. >> thank you. >> thank you for sharing that with the jury. i have some follow-up questions about your experiences with mr. floyd. before i get into that, i want to go through a few things with you. you've been interviewed by law enforcement and prosecutors several times in connection with this case. >> yes. >> the first interview you provided was may 31, 2020 with an agent from the bureau, nathan adams as well as an fbi agent and christopher plan. >> yes. >> have you had the opportunity to review transcripts of that interview? >> yes. >> you were also had a meeting december 14 with prosecution team in preparation for this case, right? >> december 14? >> december 14. would you dispute me? >> i believ

>> the report total, i believe, was close to 300 pages. that includes a rather lengthy appendix that lists out all the materials that i reviewed. the body of the report itself, which has my summary of the relevant facts and my opinions was, i think, about 112 pages, 110 pages if we take out the table of contents maybe. over 100 pages. >> did you rely on your training and your experience in academic experience to review the evidence in this case and reach your conclusions? >> yes. >> and have you reached your opinions to a degree of reasonable professional certainty based on generally accepted standards in your field? >> yes, i have. >> now, before sharing those opini opinions, circumstances i would like you to explain what factors you review when you're evaluating uses of force. >> sure. so, first is sort of the threshold point, i have to know what i'm actually looking at. i have to know which uses of force i'm reviewing. for example, if an officer is involved in a shooting, the saying is the officer has to account for every bullet that the

i can recall a department of justice memo from, i believe, 1995 that discussed it. as trained on it in 1995 as well. >> the risk is the potential, the worst outcome, is death, correct? >> yes, sir. >> when we talk about positional asphyxia and the risk that is increased from pressure? >> yes, so, positional asphyxia can occur even if there is no pressure, no body weight, on a subject. it creates a situation where a person has a difficult time breathing. when you add body weight to that it increases the possibility of death. >> what additional weight did you see in your analysis here? >> the department's body weight and the two other officers. >> they appear to be pressing down on mr. floyd? >> yes. >> is that officer king? >> yes. what was officer lane doing? >> he was holding his legs. >> sir, in applying the rules of use of force, use of reasonable force, the officer has to consider the totality of circumstances, is that right? >> yes, sir. >> and one of them could be the location that could be part of that, is that right? >> yes. >> are you aware there is a group

>> the report total i believe was close to 300 pages. at includes a rather lengthy appendix of the materials that i reviewed, the body of the report itself, which has my summary of the relevant facts and my opinions was i think about 112 pages. >> 110 if we take off the table of content. >> did you rely on your training and experience in academic experiences to review the evidence of the case to reach your conclusions? >> yes. >> did you reach your opinion to a degree of reasonable professional certainty based on generally accepted standards in your field? >> yes, i have. >> before sharing those opinions, sir, i would like you to please explain what factors you reviewed when you were evaluating the use of force. >> sure. so, first, the sort of threshold point i have to know what i am actually looking at. i have to know which uses of force i'm actually reviewing. for example, if an officer is involved in a shooting, the saying is the officer has to account for every moment that they put -- they might come to separate uses of force. after i

dikas who i believe would be a fine commissioner and is accomplished, i do not believe that her history of alliship suggests that she's going to be able to step in and do the work that commissioner highland was doing. so regretfully and, you know, certainly again no bad feelings about ms. dikas i don't think this was the right appointment and i'm not supporting it. that is my statement, folks. >> chairman: thank you, vice chair mandelman. i associate myself with your words and said as much to ms. dikas when we had a chance to visit a couple few weeks ago and with that, supervisor chan, and then we'll open it up to public comment. >> supervisor chan: thank you, chair peskin. and i concur with what vice chair mandelman is discussing and really referencing right now about representation in leadership role in our city government. i for one have always talked about that for women, women of color, chinese americans, and asian americans. in this moment, i think for me being a good ally means supporting the decision and making sure that that representation is across the board that including lgb

that he took pretty. >> yes, i believe so and i believe outside of the salvation army. too much do you recall roughly when this was taken. >> from the sweater he was wearing, i think probably the fall of 2017. >> did mr. george floyd have any children. >> yes. he had to girls. >> and did he try to be a part of their lives as much as he could. >> yes. he loved his girls. >> so his daughters were not in minnesota. no. >> no. >> make sure that your voice is loud enough so that everybody can hear. at some point, when you were in mr. george floyd did you learn of his mother's death. >> yes. and. >> do you recall when that was. >> it was in may of 2018. >> did you see, will describe to the jury if you will what you saw and the reaction to his mother's death. [crying]. [inaudible]. george floyd is what i would call a mama's boy, i could tell from the minute i met him. and when he came back from he kind of was inside of himself. like he was broken. he did not have the same kind of bounce. he was devastated. he loved his mother so much and i knew that. he talked about her all the

>> yes, i believe that they said they handcuffed him. >> okay. n that an ambulance had been summoned? >> i did. >> did you learn that the person that had been restrained was taken away in the ambulance? >> yes. >> and where was that person who had been taken? >> hampton county medical center. >> based on that conversation, what did you decide to do? >> i decided to drive down to henapee county medical center myself to check on the party's condition. >> did you give any direction to the officers you had spoken with? >> i did. i believe i asked them to hang on to the suspect's vehicle and gather any witnesses that may be around. >> and who did you direct to do that? >> i believe officer lane and ki king. >> did you give any direction to officer tou thao or the defendant? >> i did. i asked them to head down to the medical center also. >> you provided to leave the scene to go to the hennepin medical center? >> yes. >> before you left the scene, did you have a further conversation or direction to the defendant? >> i don't think so. >> do you recall spe

i believe the front of my squad car was facing eastbound on 38th. >> did you then move your squad car? >> yes. once i identified floyd, i observed the officers assisting floyd to their squad car, i looped my car around and parked in front of their car. >> so your cars were nose to nose? >> yes. >> at an angle? >> yes. >> what happened next? >> after that i got out of my squad car and observed officer kaine and lane as pinning floyd against the squad car so i wanted to assist, and once i approached officer lane told me to go and watch the car, so i did that. >> did you do that? >> yes. >> and the car was parked on 38th street so i basically went across the street to the car. >> okay. what did you do then? >> when i approached the car i observed the two individuals that initially when i arrived i saw officer lane with, and he was reaching inside the car and i told him to back away from the car and do not reach inside the car or get anything out of the car. >> so you were monitoring what the two passengers were doing at that time? >> yes. >> was your attention focussed on what the office

i 'ust couldn't believe it. i didn't_ at the age of 57. ijust couldn't believe it. just couldn't. believe it. ididn't believe it. he believe it. i didn't believe it. he was believe it. i didn't believe it. he wasjust— believe it. i didn't believe it. he was just here _ believe it. i didn't believe it. he wasjust here saturday. - believe it. i didn't believe it. he wasjust here saturday. for- believe it. ididn't believe it. he wasjust here saturday. was 'ust here saturday. for millions of wasjust here saturday. for millions of americans. _ wasjust here saturday. for millions of americans, the _ wasjust here saturday. for millions of americans, the death _ wasjust here saturday. for millions of americans, the death of - wasjust here saturday. for millions of americans, the death of richard | of americans, the death of richard nixon in a new york hospital has meant conflicting emotions. a national day of mourning next wednesday sitting somehow uneasily with the abiding memories and the shame of watergate. fiend with the abiding memories and the shame of watergate.— with

shut up i do believe it would be them but a camera of the officer with whom we are speaking and who is pictured in this in which i worked. for holmes to the right and was this insight. yes but it was a back story all right and as you describe when you learned. that there was no patient there. welcome back to the 71 you've. now got exhibit 71 screen did you then exit the store. yes and can you describe what it is that we were doing in exhibit 71 where there's a graph so. once you have the additional information facts and. what is your next record you know. we are directed to. the medics at $36.00 and park avenue self we come back of 4 truck and we responded to $36.00. and. what did you see when you. got there. the security medical center ambulance was parked on the side of the street just self of 36. and i'm at. the exhibit 74 inches already been admitted. ultimately can you just describe what point of view this and showing in exhibit 74. that's not me but this would be much of the view from my seat and so. in the foreground what is that if a fire truck that you were an. he does this fr

and i believe. before i speak to any of the amendments, i want to talk more about this resolution and why we introduced this resolution and present it to you at this hearing today. san francisco will be receiving $54 million in revenue relief funds from the state and federal government from the sb91 and the c.a.r.e.s. act. but according to a recent report from a budget legislative analyst thanks to chair preston, we now know that tenants in san francisco have accumulated over $100 million in rental debt due to the pandemic. that's twice of the amount of available public funds for rent relief. we need to make it add up. the funds from the state, the federal government are critical, but it's not enough. and we know that to support thousands of tenants in san francisco staring down thousands of dollars in rent debt. so we need to be creative. the reality is in san francisco and really many cities that we have an uneven playing field for landlords. on one hand, we have an array of small mom and pop landl

>> i believe so. yes, sir. >> right. and your job, as the lead case agent, is to sort of quarterback all of this, right? >> yes, sir. >> and as other agents receive information, you take it and you maintain a data file. correct? >> correct. >> and every time a bca agent performs some task the way the bca works is a new report is generated for that particular task. agreed? >> that is correct. >> rather than having one officer write a long narrative police report, they will write several police reports instead, right? >> that's correct. >> to date over 400 bca investigative reports have been prepared in this case. agreed? >> yeah. specifically, 440. >> so we're at almost 450. and some of those reports are even being generated now as we speak, correct? >> possibly. >> right. and, in fact, we just went through this analysis of an exhibit and you compared it to some other spibts that were already presented. that's something that literally was probably just done today, right? >> possibly, sir. >> right. i mean, you never -- th

i believe we can. i believe we must. delivering for the american people is what the american rescue plan was all about. it's been overwhelmingly popular when i wrote it, everybody said it had no bipartisan support. there is overwhelming bipartisan support with republican voters. ask around. if you live in a town with a republican mayor, republican county executive, asked them, how many would rather get rid of the plan? ask if it helped them at all. that is what the american jobs plan is about. the new one i am proposing. i hope republicans join. i hope and i believe a number of businesses will join this effort. and i hope and believe the american people will join this effort. democrats, republicans, independents. we can do this. we have to do this. we will do this. we just have to remember, this is the united states of america. i have said it a thousand times. there is nothing beyond our capacity if we act together. it's time to move together. thank you, and i hope i get to come back to see you folks after this plan is pa

. >> i believe with respect to the milestone camera, your honor, we're reserving that at this point. >> i reviewed all the video the defense provided as an offer of proof and to think the milestone parties have together and forget what is in what is not before we go any further. we'll deal with that perhaps tomorrow or -- most likely on wednesday because tomorrow we have to deal with mr. hall's invocation of his rights. mr. frank, what's the states response to this motion? >> good morning your honor. thank you. i will try to be expedient but yet i do want to be precise and thorough. we had submitted as you know some of mr. chauvin's body worn video averted. there are four videos that came from his body-worn camera. each one is labeled with a distinctive number that i believe represents the time it starts. so the first one we put in was 2011. that is essentially the drive there. we put all of that in. 2017 is the next video, , and unless we put all of that in -- i believe we put all of that in. and 2034, we put in through the timestamp on the video of 20:36:42. it's my understanding th

i believe the king is doing his best i think i believe maybe maybe we have certain corruption cases within within that don't. eat of jordan but i believe the king to strength to to challenge these cases and trying to do what's better for the jordanians everybody is you know when you have a bad going to mix you ation about growth i believe people are still trying to put this this responsibility on the lead on the king or on other people i don't think but i believe. just trying to do his best but you know people when you have that when you have. bad growth people trying to complain and they say that you have to have a better life but you know all these challenges in jordan i think think people i think affecting them their food their money their salaries aren't growing and so you have many many people saying bad things about the economy but i believe things are going i hope in the coming 23 years will be will be better of course and there's also been i will pandemics 600000 cases in jordan alone and now i note that we've seen very recently egypt saudi arabia cats and even the u.s. all of whom

>> the report total i believe was close to 300 pages. that includes a rather lengthy appendix that lists out all the materials i reviewed. the body of the report itself, which has my summary of the relevant facts and my opinions, was, i think about 112 pages. 110 pages without the table of contents. over 100 pages. >> did you rely on your training and your experience and academic experience to review the evidence in this case and reach your conclusions? >> yes. >> and have you reached your opinions to a degree of reasonable professional certainty based on generally accepted standards in your field? >> yes. >> before sharing those opinions, i would like you to please explain, what factors you review when you're evaluating uses of force. >> sure. so first, i have to know what i'm actually looking at. i have to know which uses of force i'm reviewing. if an officer is involved in a shooting, the officer has to account for every bullet they put down range. they count as separate uses of force. after i identify what the uses of force are, i app

>> clerk: i believe there may be one mr. speaker. >> chairman: next speaker, please. >> good morning. my name is dante king and i represent a group called the black employees alliance. and we had maybe over between 50 and 70 of our members contact each of you to not support this confirmation. there are many employees who believe that director isen will carry on some of the woes that the human resources will continue. so i'm not speaking on behalf of myself but on behalf of a group that consists of over 400 members. so please take that under strong advisement and consideration. >> chairman: thank you, mr. king. are there any other members of the public for public comment? >> clerk: yes. we have additional people get in line. i believe we have three additional callers. >> chairman: next speaker, please. >> hi, my name is elia hernandez and i'm with [inaudible] san francisco. and we would like to have [inaudible] to come back. >> chairman: i'm sorry. that's item number 4. the next item. >> oh, i'm sorry. >> chairman: yeah. so if

i believe it was taken at that yankee stadium game. hat was stunning is that within five years babe ruth was dead. >> right, right. >> he died so young. gavin, i know when you've got an expansive host here, he tends to eat up some time. let me know if we need to wrap up soon, because there's a couple other quick topics i would like to touch on. how are we doing? >> we've got five minutes or so, i think that would be great. >> then let's quickly -- i want to turn to this story because i think it's a story that's often overlook. it's the story of earl johnson, a red sox pitcher, who wound up engaging in 199 consecutive days. i believe1[oqçj i read that in book, michael, right, of combat? he went over and landed on omaha beach in normandy. tell us about his story. >> he was a pitcher for the red sox in the early '40s. he had some success early in his career, but the red sox pitched him in back-to-back games where he threw over 170 pitches and he was never the same. so he enlist in the army and was part of the 120th infantry. he landed norm

>> i believe he said thank you. >> if you could continue. [background noises] [inaudible] >> if you could get him. >> i said please. i said please. >> stop moving. >> after he was initially on his knees and began to put him to the ground. >> yes. >> what position to the officers place is deployed when they brought him to the ground? >> prone position. >> what is the prone position? >> you lay a person on their stomach. >> you can see as your floyd has already been handcuffed? >> yes. >> he is is now prone on the ground, handcuffed. >> yes. >> prior to him being in this position, did you see any aggressive action were interpreted as aggressive action on the part of mr. floyd? >> prior to prone position? >> prior to prone position. >> yes. >> what did you see? >> he kicked his leg. >> could you describe that kick and how it might be interpreted by reasonably police officer? >> the officers were still patrolling mr. floyd at this time and as they were trying to place him down in prone position, i believe one of the officers was trying to control

haven't also bit we have a woman who i believe in communities so full of insecurity it's going to be the cleric chant and mickey people losing the beauty so i want to kind of talk about migration correct what human dignity and we expect for our culture and betty so i think i'm totally i mean we what you said and this is exactly what's happening and get out it doesn't go out i really like i really like bring in this whole issue of could be 19 and climate change in bali a vicious velvia i've seen many of the. the dog food they had to go back to their rural climate affected areas they had to move from there in the 1st place because of you know stresses because of lack of income but once the event cyclon it gained huge them and if you think of india my russia was again. and the other side and these people it's like a double triple stress and followed by a flood and one story i would like to share about you know how a family was leaving under top of their house roof taking the bed. and then what do you have to do at night david sleeping and it was al