i. j a. c j. prove this exactly. how can it be remembered that the convention on the prevention of genocide adopted following the hollow clothes, the general side of the jewish people is now being weaponized or does the jewish state. delores normally supposed to be above politics, but when it comes to international law, things get more complicated candidates to be judges at the international court of justice, nominated by their own countries, which then campaign for them and lots of inherently political process. the elections held every year are often a drawn out procedure as they happen singleton easily in the general assembly and the security council. to publish the new non baset or to the un has told me he believes the case before the court now is being given extra weight because it's being brought by south africa, a country that suffered so much in the past. under contract rule, nobody would question that the company like south africa, which defeated apartheid that it is not on the top of the mountain of uh, of,

i said before, so a i'm, i'm afraid 5th. ready i'm not sure what's going to be the decision of the i c j. but assuming that the i c j decides that it was, should be a and the end be a good a, i'm not sure about the government, but things that is good to abide. and then it doesn't, then it should go to that a security council. go be united nations, which i'm sure that's going to a false gives away. but then the woman who may be that don't veto by the united states, but we have no data yet. i want to emphasize my signature ease to find any way possible to stop the war and save lives. unfortunately, they've joined the on demand of the concept. see like this move of volume of energy to make and instead of endorsed inc, i could meet with well being in the lives of people they couldn't tell me. i meant it. okay, the, the m a roddy president has reportedly rebuffed prime minister netanyahu his requests to pay unemployment stipends to more than a 100000 westbank palestinians working in israel, hoop and bard. and now from entering israel since october 7th. what action to expect is really cabinet to taking response to that. a

so if you look through every close of that of ruling by the i, c, j, there is a requisite, in order to do what the i, c, j to mom's, to have a see saw. he believes a c spot has to happen as close to the i c j reading and i'm sure he's going to say that, but he makes his intervention in the counsel. we're also of course, going to hear from the us. they are the one member of the security council, those blogs, any ceasefire until now, 3 times using that'd be to so interesting to hear from linda thomas greenfield, the us a baset over expecting to his speaking soon. she, interestingly, in the last 24 hours when she spoke to reporters said yes, they were looking for now all the funding to under because of those allegations of the 12 employees involved in october, the 7th. but she said under was what was vital and it was a vital lifeline for the people of gauze. so interesting, somewhat confusing comments on the us position perhaps will be clear today if she feels that the unreal, unreal work is so important when the us might restore its funding to own right. yeah, i mean talking specifically about under a month

i c j. let's get over to our correspondent, another boy, a come getting out who's been monitoring his whole report by the i c j and also gauging public reaction as well. nevada, which will resume, show you here at moscow. i hope you're going to hear me at this point. we're trying to re establish a connection, not a boy, rory, again here, and must go, can you, can you give me some feedback? i know you've been watching the i c. j for the past couple hours. you've been speaking to locals as well. i mean your in the mecca for where this cool case originated from what, what can you tell us now? a will absolute 0 re as you roughly amazing them exactly with the african national congress be does all gather today initially the happy days seat and is the meeting, but it was a collaboration off the i c j. i'm hearing and moving together with the paul to listening off of the court. but he seems to be as roughly mentioned this before to has moved. that's at the judge. what we are listening to, right. the, sorry, the judge says the i to, j's has found that too big is the genocide, this dispute between each well and so that'

and i think there is a clear case here where to buy the the court decided that yes, south africa has a reason to bring up the case in front of the i c j. and that the i c j does think that there is a reasonable evidence for why it needs to pursue this case of genocide. the guess is right. but what did you make of what the, the south african minister neither bundle was saying about, you know, the way she was asked whether or not she was disappointed about the lack of seats for on. she wouldn't be drawing on that. but she said she wanted to see if i didn't come, but she said, the, how do you stop the killing, which is the effective edict of the, of the ruling and provide aid, which is another one without a ceasefire. exactly, and these are the words of the united nations secretary general. mr. gutierrez, for the past several weeks. he's been stay, think it again. and again. as late as the day before, yesterday, he was once again at the united nations security council. it was underlining the fact that you cannot distribute humanitarian aid to the people who knew the most without the ceasefire. that despite the decision by the united nations security council

and i know there's been plenty of concerns about the i c, j here not courting for a ceasefire, but by my understanding p i c, j only has jurisdiction, but of the states, right? so here it has jurisdiction, or the israel, it doesn't have jurisdiction or the mouse and will be faced by what actually takes 2 parties in order to comply. we've had the from the lady, bundle the south african foreign minister saying, but that these 6 measures effectively amount to the factors these 5 cause you worked on the ground that what do you make of that is this effectively is he's fine without necessarily cooling it one well, 1st of all, let me say that the i c j routing is really historic story milestone in the long run to the palestinians, towards dignity and justice and states who and yes, i agree. i hope that it's on the grounds and it is the is really all me does well, it's now legally binding. they've been told by legally binding adjustment by the school to, to stop killing. you know, that's the 1st possible ski 2 of the conventions cease actions which hom, both mentally and physically promoting conditions. apply that don

a people are undermining the i. c. j, condemn israel. and the genocide case in georgia is that the i c j emphasize the di, humanitarian situation in gaza. so have a listen to this. sustains on, pardon, across the guys or strip call cause the massive displacement for the population that is in a state of flux, constantly uprooted and forced to leave overnight only to move to places which are just as unsafe of this for affected more than 2000000 people the entire population of gaza. many will carry is lifelong scars, both physical and psychological. the vast majority, including children, are deeply traumatized. overcrowded and unsanitary unrest. shelters have become home to more than 1400000 people. they lack everything from food to hygiene to privacy. people live in, inhumane conditions. where's diseases are spreading? including when children, they live through the unlivable and the with the clock ticking fast towards family . so i, that's across live now to a pair of, of correspondents. we bought the middle east bureau chief, maria from ocean are standing by for us also my have it not g r

gutierrez, issued a statement through spokesperson acknowledging the i c j ruling, but offering few insights on how he views the judgement is the secretary general disappointed that the i c. j did not call for a cease fire. there's the secretary, john was not here to do color commentating on, on decisions of the independent court of the way his position has been. what it is, it's been very clear. it's what the secretary general thinks that what he would like to see is an immediate humanitarian cease fire all eyes. now turn to the security council. it seems likely that by the middle of next week, the counselor will call for an open meeting to discuss the rulings by the i c j. then the question becomes, will algeria, the error of the member of the council begin to circulate a draft resolution calling for an immediate cease fire. diplomatic sources are telling us all indications are pointing to exactly that. gabriel is on to l just needed at united nations, new york. the 1st hearing and a civil case against us president joe biden. and all the senior lead is accusing them of being complicit in. genocide has agend for the day. right groups and a number of individual. let's have

i c j. but more to the international community. of course of africa. we'll have to spend some time bolding. it's broad a case which will be heard by the i c j. and part of it will also include those reports that will be coming out of israel and one of the other information you can click back in the short to we were 80 seeing the other countries that are welcoming the decisions. countries like wait a mom and algeria will have welcome to a decision for example. and jerry has gone to the, the has said that the us security council should debate this and, and see what could be put in place. that is more binding. and i think that that's with the next steps. we'll take, not only south africa, but the rest of the, of the world in the coming months. as the case unfold at the i, c, j, w, corresponding diane, hawker and johannesburg. thank you for those insights ceremonies that are being held today, international holocaust, remember, and stay which in germany is known as the day of remembrance the victims of national socialism. on this day and 1945 soviet forces liberated al shirts and nazi occupied poland. the largest and deadliest of concentration and

a step. thank you very much for that. recap, you're at the, i see j inside the i, c j and outside the i. c j is now where we find else is 0. is a some, a binge of aid where there is a protest and support of palestinians and south africa's petition against israel. tell us what's going on the well, this is being a charged road for a 2nd consecutive day as these proceedings have continued inside the building. people in their hundreds of men, women, and children, the other do you have come here to show solidarity with not just what south africa saying, but also with the people of god as active as of being tending of hair the mild, these deliberations continue. people are continuing to die and gaza, the buttons that are still funding on the people of gov and no aid is being allowed in. and mine is really just presenting its case as being in the past 2 days that you've seen cogent arguments being put by both sides. there were activist kids who were disappearing those uh those visuals that were presented by israel of evidence that such as the incubate is that it's been used in its presentation.

escalate back to, to germany's intervention at the, the i c, j a what the legal grounds does it have for that? so for any states party to the i, c, j, it's possible to intervene in an ongoing dispute because our disputes only take place between parties. but as the, as the j is the most, the authoritative international court did really affect all the states because they might create a president. and so germany is concerned about the interpretation of the genocide convention or 8 was concerned about that in the previous cases in which it intervene. so you could say you're on the face of it. it's not necessarily legitimate to intervene in such a case. and as i said, it's quite a bit from, from the perspective of the genocide convention, it's quite a complicated case. while, while it clearly seat incitement to genocide and way clearly see a risk or a threat of genocide, whether there is an extra commitment. often a site is quite an entry and if it could at mann and i would be very careful in jumping to a conclusion there. so there's good reasons to, you know, to make, to make and submissions for all the states. actually, the internatio

i c j. it wasn't ideal what transpired at the i c. j. so to me important and valid, but no one needs to be done. no, she also dealt with a 2 key issues. one of the, the i c j and what happens next. so that rico will be submitting the submissions to the quote. once is well, provides that report within a months about what it's doing to stop the killing, what it's doing to keep people safe in gaza. so difficult will support to submit a commentary to the i c j, and then also likely in the next few days. but given some sort of time frame around what happens next, that time frame is usually about 6 months long. but also remember parallel to that leave just quickly is that the south africa has also approach the international criminal court to hold accountable individuals. she said that she's concerned about the slow progress, but they are pushing the i c. c to do more regarding prosecutions. right? for me to me like life for us and to his bag. thank you. the ok, let's take a look at some other world news now and an anti war russian politician. let's begin the process to enter the race for president bodies and that there's the and says he has

a highland levy who speaks for the israeli government joins me earlier from tel aviv. i asked him if israel will abide by today's interim ruling from the i. c. j, the judges and the i. c, j reminded israel of the obligations that it has already taken on itself. we are already doing everything possible to minimize civilian casualties in a horrific oven was on what, how mazda is trying to use them as human shields. they're already doing everything to facilitate humanitarian aid going into gaza, and that's why there are no limitations on humanitarian aid going in. we think it's important to note with this case is happening because sound bar code trying to intervene to get the court to tell israel to stop it's campaign to defend its people and bring back the hostages would be more white for the, for the rights it to be more specific and more clear. the court has ordered israel to submit a report within a month. it's outlined all of these measures to prevent genocide on the part of israel. you will submit that report. we're currently studying the rolling. it came out only an hour ago, but of course paperwork that needs to be submitted. we will represent, we will present, it w

i c j ruling was for russia to say, so i'll still a tease in ukraine. now, that ruling and the fact that ross are ignored, it showed some of the weaknesses of the i c, j. and it's for that reason. but some experts are saying that the i c j may this time, not take it to that length, it may not go all the way cooling for full cessation of hostilities that it may give them on. you wants to pry it to ramon, you want the ruling cooling, full more i to be led into gallons of israel to hold up it's obligations and that kind of thing. now if that's the ruling, we may well see israel comply by it, but it is the ruling is that the israel has just completely saved hostilities. it is very likely the israel could ignore that, but it's just too soon to say rebecca, thank you so much for that update. that's rebecca renters for us in jerusalem turning to some other news now and pop when you get a has declared a state of emergency looting and arson in the capital port moresby have killed at least 16 people. the violence triggered by police protesting against cots to their pay. the unrest is also spread north to the city of lie prime minister and james morabe has called

i c, j. and it's for that reason. but some expense of saying that the i c j make this time, not take it to that links, it may not go away. cooling for a full cessation of hostilities that it may give them on you wants to approach ramon. you wants ruling cooling, full more a, to be leaded, to gallons of israel to hold up it's obligations and that kind of thing out you've, that's the ruling. we may well see israel comply by it. but if the ruling is that the israel has just completely seized hostilities, it is very likely that israel could ignore that. but it's just too soon to say rebecca, thank you so much for that update. that's rebecca renters for us and jerusalem. turning out of some other news poplar new guinea has declared a state of emergency looting and arson in the capital port more as they have killed at least 16 people with violence. a triggered by police protesting against the cuts to their pay. the unrest has spread north to the city of ly. and prime minister james morabe has called for calm and explosion of violence in port moresby, marked by protests of soldiers, police and prison guards, overpay cuts or angry crowds towa

i. c j. r c j. yes. court of justice. yeah. is uh, is making a dense and i think it's pretty occupying washington. because if you have 15 judges, a majority of 15 judges decides to issue an order to uh, to cease and desist. now, not in several months where they can actually make a final decision, whether is their ideas or not cutting a genocide in gaza. but whether since it is an ongoing war, whether it would issue a warning that is i must stop now. and then as far as i know, it just when the, the court will look in, you know, further deeper into what's going on. so the americans are concerned fine. and that's why they are emphasizing aid, emphasizing even in opening the, the, the, is really crossing with guys, not just the injection crossing the is that it shows you because if they wants to show, is it right as more to be novel and then what it is you talked about these really is not moving into a novice stage of this conflict. we've heard from the defense minister of his route, this plan about the post war or the plan. he has will guys of which it seems that not all we need is there any cabinet

a closer look at the role of the i c j. i think the international court of justice, or i c j as being the united nations main judicial body since 1946. its main role is handling disputes between countries, most individuals and its decisions a legally binding. but it's also office legal advice to the united nations despite being dumped the wills. quote, the i c j's role is more limited than the name suggests. it can only resolve disputes of the countries involved have recognized its jurisdiction. the court has 15 judges elected by the un general assembly and the security council. it's laid by us judge join don't i. q a former state department official, entered the peachy is russian judge could either give odeon former ambassadors of an invalid. they all represent the different regions and legal systems, and it looks like this. 3 seats occupied by african judges. judges from messing america and the caribbean holds another 23 occupied by asian judges, 5 held by judges from western europe and other western countries into by judges from eastern europe. if a country involved in a case doesn't have a judge from its region on the beach

one state filed with the i c j. 4 case of jealous i was to can be a about the general side also bringing in miramar, in 9th and in 2019. and this did go was deliberated by the i c j. and it's in fact, one of the only precedents for what we're seeing now. secondly, i would say that israel is, isn't it particularly the sort of delicate moment israel has claimed always to be the only democracy in the middle east that have had a very moral or the most more. i'm in the world. it has built itself on the legacy of the pool. so for a country like israel to be even charged with this is not just that it's unfair, the people of going after israel and also has to do with a sort of lack of disability and understanding of its own historical political position in the well by is ready to lead this and that i find tragic internally domestically not only into naturally but israel would bring itself to this point. professor bard from unfortunately we're out of time. we appreciate you taking the time to talk with us great conversation. i'm sure that will be reasons to talk again in the future. thank you. thank you very much for having me. the polish politics are not pretty at the mo

gutierrez, issued a statement through spokesperson acknowledging the i c j ruling, but offering few insights on how he views the judgement is the secretary general disappointed that the i c. j did not call for a cease fire. there's the secretary general's not here to do color commentating on, on decisions of the independent court of the what his position has been. what it is, it's been very clear. it's what the secretary general thinks that what he would like to see is an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. all eyes now turn c j, then the question becomes, will algeria, the error of the member of the council begin to circulate a draft resolution calling for an image in new york. palestinians in gaza have expressed disappointment at the ruling which stopped short of ordering a seas fine. the the, the international court was supposed to at least to demand an immediate cease by a bus. and fortunately back and it didn't, we really disappointed because it's like saying this aggression came continue. it's a pissy rebuilding. yeah, we heard about the i see a decision in the hate and it's not what we expected. most of the displaced people of civilians including children living that w

i c j reference the president of the i. c. j. yesterday in the cold hearing on 9 october 2023. mister, you'll have kalonde defense minister of israel, announced that he had ordered a complete siege of guys, a city in there, then that there would be no electricity, no food, no fuel. and that everything was closed. on 12 october 2023. mister isaac hurts, the president of israel stated, referring to gaza. i quote, we are working operating militarily according to rules of international law, unequivocally. it is an entire nation out there that is responsible. it is not true . this rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved. this is absolutely not true. the court notes that the military operation being conducted by israel following the attack of 7 october 2023, has resulted in a large number of deaths and injuries, as well as the aforementioned facts and circumstances are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by south africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible. this is the case with respect to the right of palestinians and gaza to be protected from acts of genocide. so aly as men and women and children being cut off from

i c, j appear to move so smoothly? what's all the factors involved? a well listen, the wheels of justice at the i c. j do move very slowly. the most recent of genocide case at the i c j wasn't 2019 when i began the smallest african country, excuse me, in march of genocide against or any of that was 2019 and took the i c j 4 years to decide whether or not it even had jurisdiction to the side of the question and the case is still ongoing. genocide also is a very complicated and complex question of international law. there's a lot of people, intricacies going into deciding whether or not genocide is indeed occurring. so those 2 factors, just the structural way in which the i c j, operates plus the tricky leave of questions around genocide, in particular, all combined to make this a really might be and drawn out process that will take many years. and let me ask you, what do you make to the situation with the one right then because it's a difficult position, but it's work is so vital. and you saw members of the us state department justice. we reiterate how vital the word of honor roll is, how it's irrepara

yeah, i think that's the, i mean i, i, it's a board to say that i think that's the, i see j cases already unprecedented. right. whatever happens moving forward, the i c, j cases 40 president. unprecedented. i think that it's now almost inevitable that the court has to a order, at least some of the provisional measures, which will again be incredibly unprecedented at whatever provisional measures the orders. of course, we all hope that the court orders is real to seize its attack against an inside guys and ceased inside or operations. but i think that the, the, there's a, there's significant chance, as he said, that as well will not abide by the ruling. but it's key allies and especially the united states that will put the united states in a very difficult condition. i want to remind everyone that there is an ongoing lawsuit in federal court in california against us present in spite of lincoln, austin. so they think that it will increase the isolation, that is what was already experiencing an international realm. and in that way contribute to the struggle to stop. israel is a tim rush, a go, we appreciate you being with us and i'll just do this. i thank

have quoted, a decisive victory for international know and the way called the decision from behavioral j area has requested the un security council mills a meeting. so you implement the i, c j's genocide, prevention and ruling the north african nations, foreign ministry sizes, times the israel to be held accountable for the at solve its military. while south african presidents 0, i'm oppose the states as given what his nation has gone through. it had to acts on what was happening in vasa, international courts of justice in the hague and the netherlands issue. that owning that is a victory for international law for human vice and above all for justice. some have told us that we should mind our own business and not to get involved in the affairs of other countries. we still have africans whether not to be positive bystanders. and to watch the times that we have visited up on us being perpetrated upon other people a sway my husband's back to we will begin to move toward the process where substantively a 2 state solution is being discussed. the people of palestine of stuff at home for many, many decades. i don't, but i do believe it to in today or tomorrow. but what we've done is

i, c. j stopped short of demanding a compensation for that action, which is a disappointment here in ukraine of the i. c. j also refusing to a blame russia for the downing of m. 817. the malaysian outlines jet over ukraine if which ukraine had brought saying that they was clear evidence from international investigators and from ukraine itself that russian back separate as well to blame using they say a russian supplied miss south the i c. j also rejected other claims of discrimination against s, nick tacos, and ukrainians in the occupied crime in peninsula with ukraine. of course, claiming that russia has sits systematically conducted a policy of discrimination in the annex cry may have since it took cobra in 2014 rub, mcbride. i'll just say era keith, as an anti war russian politician has begun the process to enter the race for president or his not destined says he has submitted to more than 105000 signatures of support. so essential election commission is already publicly stated. he would end russia's war and ukraine if elected officials went out. check the authenticity of the signatures before announcin

a former c, i, a director of america. and then you can go back to j, f k, marilyn monroe. apparently the, the, the allegations were the j f k linked a whole bunch of sensitive secret. them our them on, right? we didn't have what's up back then. perhaps we should have had it back. then let me, let me ask you if i may. so, but before i let you go, when it comes to developing this a, i was there any collaboration done with external agencies, private tech firms, or international partners and developing this technology? or is it all domestically done? you know, it's absolute peace dot indian absolutely indian is in house because want me to go on to any funding platform to be able to do that. then you lost myself. it's good ability because anything which is on a funding platform is very difficult then to be able to monitor. so it's a highly in depth and it's data be odd and devised. and the, i would say adapted for our means of a simulation of it is a scenario. so there is no question of it to be able to anybody want to get into it all of its going to be deducting the very important thing. the moment it is talk, then the purp

i c. j look into is really crimes in gaza. we dom on the international organizations in states including the u. n. a nice the j. inquire about as well as it commits crimes against humanity. we have my, the out to south africa regarding its claims against as well in the i, c, j. israel will face the international court for the 1st time on thursday to follow all the latest developments from the hague. be sure to stay with us here on our, to international and of course our website r t dot com a coverage of the israel guys, a war by mainstream media demonstrates a bias against the palestinians. that's according to the intercept news organizations analysis of major media coverage in the new york times, washington post and los angeles times this coverage of israel's war on guns showed a consistent bias against palestinians. the print media outlets which play an influential role in shaping us the views of the as rarely palestinian conflict, paid little attention to the unprecedented impact of israel siege in bombing campaign and both children and journalists in the gaza strip. they are set, denalis has reported that

a closer look at the role of the i. c. j has played the international close of justice or i c. j as being the united nations main judicial body since 1946. its main role is handling disputes between countries, most individuals, and its decisions a legally binding. but it's also office legal advice to the united nations. despite being dumped the wills court, the i. c. j's role is more limited than the name suggests, it can only result disputes of the countries involved have recognized its jurisdiction. the court has 15 judges elected by the un general assembly and the security council. it's lead by us judge john donahue, a former state department official, and so typically is russian judge curio give organ, former invested as of the naval lens. they all represent different regions and legal systems, and it looks like this 3 seats occupied by african judges. judges from s in america and the caribbean, hold another to 3 occupied by asian judges, 5 held by judges from western europe and other wasting countries and to buy judges from eastern europe. if a country involved in a case doe

state filed with the i c j 4 case of jennifer goes to, can be a about the general side of the bringing in miramar, in 9th, in, in 2019. and this did go um, was that liberated by the i c j and is in fact one of the only a precedent for what we're seeing now. secondly, i would say that this really isn't a particularly the sort of delicate moment. israel has claimed always to be the only democracy of the middle east that have had a very moral or the most more army in the world. it has built itself on the legacy of the article. so for a country like israel to be even charged with this is not just that it's unfair to the people of going after israel and also has to do with a sort of lack of disability and understanding of its own historical political position in the well by it's really this and that i find tragic internally domestically not only into naturally but that israel would bring itself to this point professor and brought home. unfortunately, we're out of time. we appreciate you taking the time to talk with us great conversation. i'm sure that will be reasons to talk again in the future. thank you . thank you very much for having or the polish politics are not prett

as far as the i, c, j, the, the plaintiffs, the people prosecute who want to call a bite into account. in other words, are saying that the, the treaty and the i, c j is interpretation of the treaty. uh, disclose a positive obligation on us officials to enforce that treaty and to make sure that they are not a bedding, any genocidal acts. so now they're in a break. we're going to hear from a palestinians and residents of guys a later. so we'll see how the rest of this hearing this afternoon turns out and we'll be back to you when that wraps up. all right, thanks so much rob rentals. now, the european union has said it expects is right on how much to comply with the ruling. the commission released the statement saying, orders of the international court of justice are binding on the policies and they must comply with them. europe and union expect staff for immediate and effective implementation. harry fawcett joins us live from london so high, although they cooling full implementation of this routing one must remind one cell . so this was a case not ruled by any of the european union countries. we bought by south africa . and for a long time, the mess

whatever the outcome is from the i c j in for me to can you just give us a little bit of context here and explain why south africa was so determined to bring this case to the i c, j in the 1st place has repeatedly said that it's due to bones in terms of this uh will on cause, given that its own history, its own a part that history. and that's what it considered as a to existing cause i to know and that a party policies have been just around the south african government, specifically the governing amc, their relationship longstanding relationship with palestine and for a long time for decades. so supporting the palestinian course, very different to what the south african apartments of african government said during that time. and in that time in fact being an ally and having good relations with israel that has changed markedly in the last 2 years. a specifically going back to the former president, nelson mandela. so these that i frequent government has said that it's do t boned. and as i mentioned earlier that it will continue to use old means to try and bring the ceasefire. but specifically linked to injustices in south africa that it says it should not be repeat

i c, j. c said back in october, the 8th intended to launch a prosecution of u. k. politicians, including government ministers alleging their complicity and will crimes in goss i . c j. pete has now launched a criminal complaint to the metropolitan police here in london, handing of a dossier of evidence relating to alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in gaza. and the extent to which these actions affect to include u. k. citizens that is covered in terms of u. k. lo and the principle of universal jurisdiction. complaint articulates the names of the ministers and officials, accessories liabilities by the supply weapons, and really to support by providing moral encouragement and providing political cover. the actions considered from local and international and domestic law. now this is just the 1st price of our residence on the 1st list of suspects of investigation i. c. p continues, and we will have further offenses and further cuts and rid of suspect, including commentators or continued to support will pride on his side by mints in the region. in the complaint to scotland, yard or 9 u. k. citizen is active in these really ami is rarely officials as well. a

the i c j today and run a my folks are saying that he's very concerned about a further deterioration of the situation and gone to go pretoria and south africa does welcome the decision from the i c j, some of the measures that were handed down from the international court of justice saying that israel should not come in acts of genocide against the palestinians. israel must take all measures to prevent, i'm punish incitement to genocide. it must take immediate measures to allow basic services on should monetary and assistance to get into the gaza enclave. it also must preserve the evidence of what is happening in gaza. israel also has to report back to the i c. j in one month. to report on the matches being implemented around the post. i think this order from the i c j is binding on israel and old parties to the genocide convention to respect the law. one of the final comments from economic flow. so he says, we expect as well as a democracy to abide by the measure was handed down by the i c, j and respect international law. so the international court of justice has issued a series of rulings on emergency measures and the genocide case submitted by south africa. it has instructed i

a case at the i c j. i genocide, case with icy j. uh, back in 1993 with regards to bosnia. and he's been saying that this is an open shot case that he expects that sometime in january of an emergency order is going to be issued by the i c j interfere in favor of the palestinians. so that for, it's a, it's not emergency or to very quickly they will have to abide by it and it will have to be a ceasefire. well, that's the tricky part. it's, it's not enforceable. it's not enforceable. in fact, there was an order issued in 2022 against russia, and russia did not stop. it's active at ease. but there's a lot to be said about what you know, what this will say about israel's legitimacy and an international arena, claiming that it's a state and that a respect to international law. and i think it's, there are going to be very interesting implications for the united states because the united states is going to be obligated to desist effectively in all of its um, activities aiding and abetting. israel's military activities must be relieved that will be um picking this throughout the eve

a report to the i c. j that outlines the measures being taken to address these provisional measures. this must be submitted within the span of one month from the voting provided as a j space has more now from the 17 judges of the international criminal court. the u. n's talk legal body took part in the deliberations on south africa's case against israel. rule terms of the genocide convention, is that ruling right out by the courts. president concluded that south africa's planes were plausible, but the situation and cause that was very grave and urgent. and the israel by the dehumanizing language of its leaders, had shown intent. so she directly quoted israel's president and its defense minister, minister, golan stated, speaking to his rarely troops on the guards and border. i quote, i have released all restraints. you saw what we are fighting against. we are fighting human animals. this is the isis of gaza. is the quotes president then read out because the judge's decision was israel most in accordance with its obligations under the genocide convention in relation to palestinians in gaza. take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts withi

i c j . let's say some crazy things of africa, the moral voice of the world. let's face that and know as a normal country is coming out and bringing israel to the court and the i, c, j finds a way to say we demand as really stop immediately and have a ceasefire. so what was going to listen to that? who cares about that? at this point is just not relevant. were defending is rarely citizens from rocket fire. we're trying to get our hostages back. why isn't this a mazda on trial? why aren't all these companies that are calling for, sees fire? they're exactly where am i to know who to, because most has noticed the show, but it's the heavier, the, the attorney general here when it be appreciated, have the right now i just want to thing, do you want secretary read to me that you have to have it we have to move towards the palestinian state and is we'll have to recognize that. but never once did he say the palestinians have to recognize israel because the leaders are right. and i'm, i think we are not, we don't hold into states. so what is this all about is politics or i meant to what, what saint michel the in our play. i'm an excellent where i c, g has to say thanks for j