i personally read all the documents of the un international court of justice on the situation in kosovoemember very well the decision of the international court of justice, where it is written that in the exercise of the right to self-determination. one or another territory of any state, are not obliged to apply for permission to declare their sovereignty to the central authorities of the country. this was said in relation to kosovo and this is the decision of the international court. and this decision was supported by everyone. i personally read all comments and legal and administrative political bodies of the us european countries. all this was supported. if so, then the republic of donbass is the donetsk republic. and the luhansk people's republic. they have the same right, without applying to the central authorities of ukraine, to declare their sovereignty. because the precedent has been set. do you agree with this? first of all, mr. president of the united nations does not recognize, kosovo means, let me finish. well, the court recognized that if this is a precedent, then the same

something to keep in mind, too, that there are two primary international institutions that deal with rules of war, international court of justiceal criminal court . now international court of justice can only rule rule disputes between states and russia has already been under investigation as ukraine has started an investigation against russia. if the court of justice international court of justice rules against russia than they can ask the united nations security council to actually enforce. uh there's you know, indictments against russia and the united nations security council. as you know, russia has veto power on on the security council, so it's you know, it's unlikely. on that the international court of justice will be effective there now the international criminal court, on the other hand, can prosecute and investigate war crimes committed by individual leaders . um now they could, in fact, investigate and prosecute. individual leaders for this war crimes, however, um, they're not gonna be able to, you know, to bring these individuals to the hague for trial because they rely on international and individual states to actua

we have ahead of us, uh, the international court of justice, first of all, its creation and preparationmaterial. everything the rest is of less interest to us. well, in fact, the fact that the chancellor flies live to moscow and talks are planned face to face. and of course, he says that something will be discussed . well, the discussion stage is not intended for the general public. well, it's probably for today. normally, i think we don't have the slightest frame to see. e. i don't think we have the slightest reason. yes, there is not the slightest reason to doubt the experience of our president, for whom he has already held such negotiations in his political life. oh, how many, therefore, probably, to the extent that it will be possible to bring results. we'll find out in just a few hours. it remains to wait, but what else i would like to say, mm, returning to the topic that we have already discussed literally one remark, you understand, in addition to the fact that the west is waging today, well, i am starting a geopolitical war with russia. well, how to wake up, one gets such an ala

between the two parties and also assumes united states would want to get involved with the international court of justicethe potential blowback to the united states of recognizing the international court justice's authority to make these kinds of decisions in terms of wars the u.s. has been involved with in the past? >> the advantage of this is, one, it is the united states, are very poor mad test problematic role with the international court of justice. the original case that appeared before the court of human rights was ukraine v russia. in organization such as the city, mariupol, kharkiv, levine --lviv or the ukrainian government, they can file -- they can go to the european court of human rights and make a motion for the imposition and for damages because of russia's to find that the courts order to mediate leasees damage to the -- immediate cease to damage. the european court of human rights and that as the council administers of the council of europe, which is a kind of volunteer organization, something -- nonetheless, the council ministers basically, the foreign ministers and some of the prime min

international court of punishment. no , we must already now, at the word of a unipolar world , form new international organizations in the first place. this is the international court of justice. everything that we now see in separate e should be shown there, it runs, of course, of course, that would be very cool. it was just e historical justice that prevailed him, if the international court of justice was established in belgrade by the yugoslavs. the serbs remember everything, starting from the silversmith and ending with the bombardment. nato of all, uh, serbian cities, so today, when conducting this operation, we must definitely document everything, create these ones, and criminal cases on the toughest events that are taking place in eastern ukraine, of course, everything is documented, and mr. bastrykin has already been to the territory of the donetsk people's republic came to mariupol and investigators. ours work there. and, of course, while to every fact in the search for that bucha that kramatorsk. criminal cases and of course, here in this sense, nothing will be forgotten. as you rightly mentioned about the serbs. the day before, they announced that they were ready t

well, i think first we want to separate the international court of justice from the international criminal court. both have jurisdiction in slightly different ways. so, the international court of justice is the u.n. court, the world court, and it settles disputes between states. so ukraine on february 26th brought a complaint against russia saying that russia had violated ukraine's sovereignty and that the basis for the invasion, the so-called humanitarian -- these so-called humanitarian reasons were false and so asked the court to judge on this question of where russia's intentions to prevent a genocide in ukraine valid and legitimate. ukraine asked for the court to say this is false. in the meantime, to order interim measures including as you said that russians must halt operations until the judges can get to the bottom of this. that would only resolve the disputes between russia and ukraine. but then you have the international criminal court, which is designed to hold individuals criminally accountable. and so for both institutions it will take some time. ukraine has about six months to

after years of legal battles, the international court of justice ordered columbia to immediately cease naval and fishing activities in waters that the court ruled belong to nicaragua, by interfering with fishing and marine scientific research activities of nicaragua and flag, or nicaraguan licensed vessels and with the operations of nicaragua and naval vessels in the republic of nicaragua, exclusive economics, the republic of columbia has violated the republic of nicaragua as sovereign rights and jurisdiction in this matter. time zone after ruling is the latest in the century. old dispute between the 2 countries over a number of islands in the western caribbean that are home to one of the world's largest coral reefs. nicaragua filed this case in 2013, after a previous 2012 ruling confirmed columbia sovereignty over the main islands. but reduce the expensive c belonging to columbia, giving nicaragua, access to under water, oil and gas deposits, as well as fishing rights contin or a. but then colombian, president, one mon, wed santos said, colombia could not agree to changing its territo

now we is, that is, there will be no dire consequences following the meeting of the un international court of justicetion number two. yes indeed in eider there is a mousse, an international criminal court. the russian federation does not participate in your activities, has withdrawn its signature under the rome statute of the ninety-eighth year, option three, with which everyone associates the gaps. as i understand it, he is the most, and for all such a worker, an apparent worker is an option from the establishment of an international tribunal. firstly, again, in order to establish an international tribunal, you need to gather everyone, you need to bring the situation to the end. and again, if we have been conducting a special military operation since february 24, our opponents are definitely ours. this is quite obvious to everyone, not only ukraine is conducting a special information operation, therefore, naturally. this creates the effect of such a massive presence in the media, maybe even such a very significant one, but again, this is a phantom, this is more of an illusion, but the tribunal, if t

on ukrainian justice for these war criminals; moreover, we cannot even count on to the international court of justicethat the international court of justice has become a political organization that our investigative bodies are now operating in the political russophobic trend. our court, our military courts , must establish every criminal who mock our soldiers and every scoundrel must be held accountable by us. i agree that we now have a direct line of military observer yuri podyako. let's find out from yuri how things are. now at the fronts, yuri is a good day. here we are talking today with the luhansk people's republic. and there in the frontier there was an undermining. as we were informed tanks with chemicals. what information in general in this direction, judging by the fact that they go to extreme measures, everything is bad for them, and they are trying to damage to the republics. well, it’s not even at the expense of protecting, as they say. now the question is not about money, but about how to save yourself, that is, the war is not for life, but to the death, unfortunately, not everyone in r

of the citizens, kosovo means striving for kosovo to take its rightful place in the international arena, including the normalization of relations. here, focused on mutual recognition, the international court of justice010 recognized independence, kosovo was exercised the right to self-determination, according to which the territory of the state is not required to ask permission to declare sovereignty from the central authorities, the same thing happened in donbass in 2014, residents of several territories of two e, at least two e subjects of then ukraine did not agree to a coup d'état with its result, but, e, were subjected to. uh, very strong pressure, including through large-scale military operations using combat aircraft and hmm and uh, heavy war equipment. this is how the crisis in the donbass in the southeast of ukraine arose. russia is now ready for negotiations, but it is ukraine that is blocking agreement after the meeting in istanbul and preliminary agreements, kiev is provoking to negotiate better conditions and apparently to impress london and washington the achievement of these agreements and after our uh, in my opinion, enough clearly demonstrated uh intentions to create favorable condi

facilitate far better the work of the international criminal court, the international criminal court, the international court ofjustice and international court of justiceo things but we need to get on it with it. sorry to race you because we just have a few minutes left. this is a question from andy, who asks and this is what a lot of people have been asking, what do nato and the rest of the world do, when there are no more sanctions possible? surely putin knows there is only so much the west can do against his country and eventually these options will dry up and then, what happens? it seems that there has been not much thinking about this, the west really relied on the sanction, the diplomacy and military support to be enough to change the state in moscow, we knew theyeesed them in answer keptal way and have not affected what russia is doing on the ground in ukraine. but there are some very important sanction, perhaps knots sanctions but basically stopping energy supplies with russia, at the moment they include for example coal supplies but they just amount russia get eabout $4 billion a year from coal supplies to the eu, energy, energy supplies, oila

international criminal court. neither can really bring allegations to prosecutors. the international court of justicehich rules on disputes between states have ruled upholding the rules of war. which of these bodies is more apt to take on a case like this? alexander: there is already a case for the icj. there are a number of options in terms of accountability. you can have commissions of inquiry that can be undertaken. you have the work that is done by human rights monitors as we have been hearing about. you can also have domestic courts that are established also through the principle of universal jurisdiction which has proliferated recently. you can have other countries bring suit, hold people accountable. there are a number of different options. folly: who should be prosecuted though in this case? would it go as far up as president putin? alexander: well, we know that it is very hard to arrest and put him on trial, but people can be tried -- suits can be brought forth without the person being present. if they don't show up, they lose a degree of credibility. certainly i expect and i'm virtually cer

and namely, with the 3 course to the international courts of justice or other other mechanisms if all the other ones foreseen in the charter faith. but that is one thing that is true and obvious and that no arguments can change. we have not ukrainian soups in the 30, tory of the russian federation, but we have russian troops in the territory of ukrainian feathers. or that was the un secretary general speaking earlier in moscow, has been speaking just moments ago with the russian president vladimir putin. are these are the latest pictures we're getting from that meeting in moscow. we heard 1st from the russian leader who said that talks with ukraine are continuing in an online format that we're put in says he hopes that those talks with ukraine will yield to positive results. the un secretary general for his part has been re treating his calls for a cease fire in ukraine to allow for the safe passage of civilians are he wants humanitarian court or set up in the besieged city of mary. a ball where civilians have been trapped with limited food and water going in. so he's trying to to get

explains from columbia capital over to please be seated after years of legal battles, the international court of justice ordered columbia to immediately cease naval and fishing activities in waters that the court ruled belong to nicaragua, by interfering with fishing and marine scientific research activities of nicaragua and flag, or nicaraguan licensed vessels and with the operations of nicaragua and naval vessels in the republic of nicaragua, exclusive economics, the republic of columbia has violated the republic of nicaragua as sovereign rights and jurisdiction in this matter. time zone after ruling is the latest in a century old dispute between the 2 countries over a number of islands in the western caribbean that are home to one of the world's largest coral reefs. nicaragua filed this case in 2013, after a previous 2012 ruling confirmed columbia sovereignty over the main islands, but reduced the expense of c belonging to columbia, giving me access to under water oil and gas deposits, as well as fishing rights. continue or a big but then colombian, president one manuel center said colombia could not

connection with the situation around donbass, putin reminded buteri that the decision of the international court of justicethe right of a territory to declare sovereignty without the consent of the central authorities. the president added that kosovo is recognized as an independent state by many western countries, and russia acted in a mirror manner in relation to the dpr and lpr. i remember very well the decision of the international court, where it is written that in the exercise of the right to self-determination. this or that territory states, however, are not obliged to apply for permission to declare their sovereignty to the central authorities of the country. this was said about kosovo and this is the decision of the international court. and this decision was supported by everyone, i personally read all the comments and legal and administrative political bodies of the us european countries. all this was supported. if so, then the republic of donbass is the donetsk republic. and the luhansk people's republic. they have the same right, without applying to the central authorities ukrainian authorities

international criminal court against russian military officials. but alexander, neither ukraine nor russia party to the international criminal court to the rome statute. so neither can really bring allegations to prosecutors and the international court of justice, which was on dispute between states, both have rolled, upholding the boards of war. which of these 2 bodies you think is more apt to take on a case like this? yeah, well, there's already a case for the j of more broadly. is there a number of different options in terms of accountability and have emissions of inquiry that can be undertaken the work that's done by human rights monitors. as we've been hearing about, you can also have domestic cords that are established also through the past for universal jurisdiction which has political rated recently. you can have other countries, you know, bring, bring sued, hold people accountable. so there are a number of different options or should be who would be prosecuted in this case? what would it go as far up as present put in himself? well, we know we know that very hard to rest and put them on trial. then people can be tried, you know, 6 can be brought forth without the person being present. if they don't show up, of course they lose a degre

mechanisms in which clearances can be addressed, and namely with the recourse to the international court of justice or other of the mechanisms if all the other ones foreseen in the charter faith. but there is one thing that is true and obvious and that no arguments can change. we have not ukrainian troops in the 30, tory of the russian federation, but we have russian troops in the territory of ukrainian federation. i left lesson in a bit more to what the russian leader has been saying in his meeting with the un secretary general, gave in 3 or 400 men will at the moral her lawyer smug that it was m experienced it please. the craftsman, if there is a desire to keep go and check for the red cross representatives around his eyes are representatives how they are kept or have their ideal is place. you are welcome to go and check. this is somewhat of this simplest issue, the same place, decision we pedestal authorities not so simple matter. and let's discuss this apologies are that our meeting are seems to have ended. those were pictures that were fed early of the meeting between the a, russian president

british kicked out all the natives, to build a us military base, an occupation that the international court of justiceled illegal. or, for example, guam or hawaii or all of australia but what really worries us. so this is what the chinese communist party wants to be as big assholes like us, and we can't let that happen. that's why we need an oculus. excellent advertising is actually anti-advertising. uh, it is obvious that the decrepit hegemon in the form of the united states of america can no longer completely control the system of international relations. although it is very striving to be within the framework. these illusions, e, a monocentric world order, and in this regard, our american colleagues need new blood of new blood in order to spur the development of e, such atavism of the archaism of the cold war in the form of the north atlantic alliance that is why we are talking about inviting the dash to force the dash to force it to join this atlantic alliance , which already has absolutely no real goals, but has some virtual goals e sweden their finland further on it is obviously necessary to dev

we welcomed international court of justice as provisional measures, ordering russia to suspend military operations. immediately. we fully support the investigation launched by the prosecutor of the international criminal court into war crimes and crimes against humanity, as well as the work of the independent commission of inquiry. the e was assisting the ukrainian prosecutor general and civil society in the collection and preservation of evidence of the war crimes. it is clear, there must be and there will be accountability the you and his member states are providing shelter for the more than 4000000 refugees that fled russia's violence. they do so regardless of nationality at nicety, religion, or we have adopted sanctions against the russian government. it's financial and defense sectors, and those individuals enabling and financing the aggression. we have committed significant funding to the un humanitarian flash appeal and regional refugee response plans for ukraine. so far, the, even it's member states of mobilized over 1100000000 euros in emergency aid. this comes on top of the 24

british drove out all the natives to build a military base in the us occupation, which the international court of justicet legal or like guam or hawaii or all of australia but what really worries us. so it's that the chinese communist party wants to be big assholes like us, and we can't let that happen. that's why we need an oculus. well , of course, uh, such a performance and the ideas of the americans, uh and the british to include japan cause a smile, because it is clearly this night more of a populist nature, because japan is in place. japan seems so to me, and i will now explain to agree to such a decision. well, that would be the height of idiocy. sorry, first of all, japan will not settle the issue with russia, we do not have a peace treaty, there is, according to japan, the disputed territory, finally. japan is always worried about the presence next to them of north korea, which always tests its ballistic missiles, missiles in close proximity to japan in china , and finally china, which has its own tasks. eh, in general in this region and japan thus exacerbate the situation around them. here in s

the 1st today, the international court of justice is holding initial hearings in a case brought by ukraine against rush rover accusations of genocide. ukraine is looking to establish that russian claims that its neighbor has committed acts of genocide in the hands can don't yeske a false, and that therefore russia cannot legally claim to be intervening to prevent or punish ukraine. this is, you can't be embarrassed. johnson accuses russia of committing war crimes. joining me now from miami, florida is madame benjamin, the co founder of grassroots, anti war and geo code pink. thank you so much. would ever coming back on you know, you been campaigning against nature wars for decades. do you think vladimir putin is actually now united the world behind nato, nato, the organization that you've been so critical of for years? absolutely. we were looking forward to the june meeting in nato that is happening in madrid, organizing around it, saying, you know, this is the time to really take the air out of nato to show that after afghanistan and the fiasco there. nieto is really an aggressive militar

but 1st, today, the international court of justice is holding initial hearings in a case brought by ukrainians. rush rover accusations of genocide. ukraine is looking to establish that russian claims that its neighbor has committed acts of genocide in the hands can don't yeske a false, and that therefore russia cannot legally claim to be intervening to prevent or punish ukraine. this is, you can't be embarrassed. johnson accuses russia of committing war crimes. joining me now from miami, florida is madame benjamin, the co founder of grassroots, anti war and geo code pink. thank you so much for coming back on. you know, you been campaigning against nature wars for decades. of do you think vladimir putin is actually now united the world behind nature nature, the organization that you've been so critical of for years? absolutely. we were looking forward to the june meeting in nato that is happening in madrid, organizing around it, saying, you know, this is the time to really take the air out of nato to show that after afghanistan and the fiasco there. nieto is really an aggressive military allian

accuse their opponent of what they have done and it is very frightening if you go to the international court of justicet i hope will happen and the russians will be found guilty of these actions you will have to have good evidence you will have to be good investigators you you will have to collect all the materials you can with the testimonies of eyewitnesses, etc. and why is this happening now? do you think it is important to recognize this as genocide, and what, and maybe moral consequences, will such a decision have for russia, there are a number of different international crimes for which russians can be considered guilty in ukraine for war crimes and crimes against humanity aggressive war as a serious crime they committed we must remember that the nazis were executed in nurberg primarily for aggressive war more than for any other crimes there are people who some international lawyers also believe that genocide is a crime against crimes, that is, the worst of all international crimes, it carries with it a certain shame, which seems to be more powerful than war crimes, crimes against humanity and ag

remember to russia in court in uh, international court of mischievous criminal over here. the international court of justicee same as russia's pretext that they should lead troops to fight against the ukrainian genocide is not true. this is their yuri conclusion. conclusions, therefore, and if genocide means for russia just mass murder, then yes, genocide, but genocide is clearly defined in the un and in this case it does not fit formally does not fit and remember there are three criteria, yes ethnic religious yes, respectively. and what we do not see now, uh, calls to exterminate russians, yes, kill russians, uh, deport russian ex-heads yesterday, because, uh, because they are russians. they will tell you the answer to this, that from the other side you also understand russian, what a thing. it's whatever. look here . this is the same as zelensky here biden, he says zelensky is a jew, and we they say that nazism can no longer be in ukraine. here's a biden to do. now this statement is more than that, in fact, and zelensky is playing this story. he is addressing the bear. actually, yes, he is no longer just

the context of the icc-17 court. the aggressor country, the moscow federation, blocked all proceedings at the un security council, but it was bypassed and the international court of justicee first results are already beginning, well, that is, we already have the first results of the investigation itself, where moscow is clearly blamed the federation and not only individual terrorists whom it hired, and i think that ukraine should also follow this path, but for this path to be realized, we need to convince mainly the majority of countries that are not just in the security council, but also in the un general assembly, and for that reason, each of them it is necessary to enter and poke the face of bucha with the shrillness of the wet soil in chernihiv kharkiv where you can get to and in particular in this context i personally believe that the president of germany should have been met in ukraine and should have been shown to him and that he with his example, he called on other countries to change their views and now when they are spreading treason against the pope, although i do not support either the statements or the actions that were taken in the easter context, but the p

old, and so far most of the evidence collected at the un is kept because there is no international court of justicem ashamed that there is no justice system that would respond to mass rapes and mass murders. russia will answer for crimes against ukrainians. the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe supported the creation of an international tribunal on the crimes of the russian federation in ukraine . the recommendation was approved on the basis of the report of the german deputy frank schwab, the document notes that the wounded died with an increasing number of testimonies about atrocities committed by the russian occupiers. it is also fully support efforts to investigate war crimes, international crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide committed by russians in ukraine , 64 days of heroic resistance of the ukrainian people continue, russian invasions, the occupiers are increasing their offensive and trying to surround the troops in the east, the most active in the slobojan and donetsk directions in donbas, our defenders repelled six attacks the enemy destroyed five tanks, one art sy

and namely with the 3 course to the international courts of justice or other other mechanisms if all the other ones foreseen in the chart, the faith. but that is one thing that is true and obvious and that no arguments can change. we have not ukrainian troops in the 30, tory of the russian federation, but we have russian troops in the territory of ukrainian federation. here to program. that is true. i confirmed that slam talk, don't tell you news outlet one to schwartz lend to don't tell you or have questions for both of us speak as mr minister as expected later today, the young journalist hemley will vote on the draft resolution of lichtenstein on to vito right providing. ready for the full convenience of the general assemblage time a p 5 country impose 72. how do you thing, what does the most code take on this initiative? and what is the most close attitude? moscow's attitude towards reforming the security council and the possibility of repealing the imposed v 2 off to the g. a assembly is held in the aftermath and 2 minutes to meet with mr. garrett. irish being the secretary . rea

and namely, with the very course to the international court of justice or other other mechanisms if all the other ones foreseen in the chart, the fact. but that is one thing that is true and obvious, and that's no arguments can change. we have not ukrainian troops in the 30, tory of the russian federation, but we have russian troops in the territory of ukrainian federation. here to blow them your picture. this is true, i can confirm this. i shall send him, that'll miss dean clinton, especially dental kids as well as some leant rooms. i do have a question, 2 old speakers with mr. level for today. if there is a court order. but if the guys resolution put forward by leash stine that is being decided regarding a change of the rules of the security council in order to do away with the veto, right. what is russia's position? and what do you think about the veto rights to be waived? for leach, vote should be taken in the security council and the general assemble, mister quoterush, what do you think should be done in order to reform the united nations regarding the resolution that was put forwa

and sincerely believe in international law as a fundamental principle and tool to bring all the guilty to justice, that is why we initiated a case in the un international court ofustice against russia on charges of genocide and handed over all the necessary documents just two days after the start of the full-scale invasion, ukraine also offers to attract the best experts in international law to create an international tribunal to punish those guilty of russian aggression against ukraine. i believe that it will complement the work of the international criminal court in punishing persons guilty of preparing and committing aggression. i urge you mining colleagues to seriously consider the idea of ​​creating such a mechanism and support it. dear crimes, i just wanted to i would like to say: look, it may seem that everyone is moving in parallel paths, and that this is not good. in fact, what i hear from diplomats on the sidelines , they say the opposite, we should now use all opportunities, well, collect materials, and then we will decide, colleagues, mr. dmytro, another equally important topic i would like to discuss with you the highly praised bill in the us congr

international court of justice ordered the immediate suspension of military operations on ukrainian territory nations to take action is the guarantor enforcement of the icg decisions in the dispute, established under international law must be geared toward achieving this progressively and the humanitarian needs including the humanitarian needs and more and more urgent needs of refugees and internally displaced. the flood of images of the streets of bucha and other cities circulating in recent days have moved the world. we strongly condemn atrocities captured in those images, there is nothing that can justify them. protecting the civilian population is the responsibility borne by the international community. the high commission for human rights pointed out gross international humanitarian and international human rights law violation to consider the possibility war crimes may have been committed. mexico stands strongly and resolute by secretary-general's calling for prompt impartial investigations leading to the identification of perpetrators and accountability for them. by the same token, we t

of those responsible will be held to account in accordance with international law. we welcome the international court of justice's measures ordering rushahd to suspend the military operations immediately. we fully support the investigation launched by the prosecutor of international criminal court into war crimes and crimes against humanity as well as the work of independent commission of inquiry. the eu is assisting the ukrainian prosecutor general in the civil society in the collection and preservation of evidence of the war crimes. it is clear there must be and there will be accountability. the member states are providing shelter for the more than 4 million refugees that fed russia's violins. violence.they do so regardless e nationality, religion or race. we have adopted a sanctions against the russian government, its financial and defense sectors and those individuals enabling and financing the aggression. we have committed a significant funding to the humanitarian appeal and the refugee response plans for ukraine. so far, the eu and its member states mobilized over 1.1 billion euros in emergency aid. this co

general assembly of the oun passed a resolution on the cessation of aggression, and the un international court of justice corresponding verdict on stop the aggression, because i am still an international criminal court. this is a different court and a different jurisdiction, it is also in asia, and after that, if he does not comply, putin does not comply with the resolution of the general assembly and the court, the general assembly headed by guter is obliged to create a headquarters to ask for peacekeeping forces and up to a demonstration of force. they have the right to curb the aggressor. first of all, secondly, everyone is talking about nato, what it is, well, because it was a start for putin, he clearly oriented himself, but today under the auspices of the un simply, in accordance with the un charter, you can close the sky, the hotel should create a headquarters, then that headquarters must be subordinate to the security council of the united nations and he has the right to ask to create a dead part of such decisions with the help of his right of veto in the un security council. it is correct and ye

and namely, with the recourse to the international court of justice or other other mechanisms if all the other ones foreseen in the chart of the faith. but there is one thing that is true and obvious and that no arguments can change. we have not ukrainian troops in the 30 tory of the russian federation, but we have russian troops in the territory of ukrainian federation. how g there is dose jabari has more on the talks in moscow. the secretary general is saying that there are clearly 2 narratives here about her, regardless of that, she was adamant that he has ever come to moscow as a messenger of peace. and he said that they, he had a very frank conversation with the russian foreign minister, sir. de lover of a antonio gutierrez, saying that his main objective was to end the suffering of the civilian population in ukraine, and also to minimize the impact this conflict has had on a, the, a civilian population around the world. specifically, he talked about how it has affected the price of food in africa, and that is something that is as a direct result of this at so called special mili

but 1st, today, the international court of justice is holding initial hearings in a case brought by ukrainians. rush rover accusations of genocide. ukraine is looking to establish that russian claims that its neighbor has committed acts of genocide in the hands can don't yet sca false and that therefore russia cannot legally claim to be intervening to prevent or punish you. crane this is u. k. p. morris johnson accuses russia of committing war crimes. joining me now from miami, florida is madame benjamin, the co founder of grassroots, anti war and geo code bank. thank you so much for coming back on. you know, you been campaigning against nature wars for decades. do you think vladimir putin is actually now united the world behind nato, nato, the organization that you've been so critical of for years? absolutely. we were looking forward to the june meeting in nato that is happening in madrid, organizing around it, saying, you know, this is the time to really read it, take the air out of nato to show that after afghanistan and the fiasco there. that nato is really an aggressive.

ukrainian officials are calling for forensic investigations by the united nations and the international court of justice. a global reckoning for what has happened in this country. with president villamor, zalinski has described as a genocide presented as a j, as a bush to go swimming. yet hundreds of people killed, tortured, executed civilians that the bodies on the streets booby trapped areas. even the bodies of the dead, a booby trapped widespread aftermath of looting concentrated evils, visited our land, the killers, executioners, rapists, marauders, who call themselves an army and who deserve only death after what they've done low . even in the safety of shelters in levine, ukrainians carry their anger with them. if i could go to war, i would go, i swear i would go, i would strangle and kill these fits with my hands. hatred of pure hatred. the nazis did not do things as this gum does. peaceful people are being shot us from morning till night. houses are collapsing, families fall apart, children die every day. you hear a child died, a child died, come money, you can't counted anymore. how many civili

international criminal court. this uselessness is absolutely true, that's the point, but the problem is that everyone understands perfectly well that such a transfer resolution is made by the international court of justicessia, it's all flown, so this is an impasse when you need to create some kind of separate, if we really want investigate, because we again have andrey vladimirovich, we again have an example of how this international criminal court works. this same court worked in relation to the crimes of the serbs in relation. to correctly i say everything in other mechanisms. no, that's all. so you need to either come up with them, or even abandon this more or less objective system. the north to the west have already blamed the military conflict for these war crimes. it continues to imagine that in the course of a military conflict, when significant part of the countries, but already in essence. uh, the opinion about what happened there was expressed and it is against russia, yes, that is, the accused country, the accused is russia to imagine that these countries will refuse to go to the temple as part of any investigation in any format during the military conflict from these accusations. yeah, it j