while selling arms to iran could benefit russia's economy that economy could suffer in the oil markets. the u.s. energy information administration estimates oil prices could fall as much as $15 a barrel once iran is allowed to freely export oil. >> joins us tonight from washington d.c paul very good to have you with us. you recently wrote a report on what the deal means for russia, saying that it's the key beneficiary of the deal and that the biggest benefit is that it assures the continuation of the lawkislamic republic. >> riz is key to emerge because it will before benefit a newly empowered iran to exploit its oil and gas reserves to generate revenue. and will generate a windfall as you mentioned earlier $150 billion has been held in escrow. russia is poised to benefit both economically and politically. economically russia's been working very hard even before the signing of this deal to position itself to make a large number of sales in the commercial space, as well as in the military space. in the commercial space it's hoping to exploit iranians' appetite for rebuilding the economy

he's going to need that push from his patrons iran and russia and i think right now is a good time for -- especially iran as it joins the international community to sort of cash in on some political capital. and come out as a conciliatory party in the -- to resolve the crisis in syria. >> on the other hand, how much can peace talks accomplish if groups like i.s.i.l. and el nusra who has become large players in the war there will likely never be included in those talks? >> you know i think i.s.i.l. will be irrelevant as soon as there's some solution to the syria crisis, if assad is removed from power i.s.i.l. will become more and more irrelevant, as people on the ground stop supporting it. i.s.i.l. gets its power from the existence of the assad regime. so tackling that will neutralize i.s.i.l. >> other big news about syria this week was this establishment of a safe zone. in the north first it was announced that the u.s. and turkey would those are this zone there. now it is not even clear that the u.s. has agreed to it. so is there confusion about what the parties want to do? >> well, i

the president of iran is in russia, there's a brcs moting, and he's complimenting russia, thanking them for support. seemed strange he was off to russia, seems like brinksmanship. everyone saying they are prepared to walk away from the deal, maybe to force the other side to say hey, they may walk away from the deal. senior officials that i have been speaking to have been treating this as if the deal will get down. as you describe to the audience, the july 9th deadline was important to the obama administration. it's not of great significance to the iranians, there's a sense of discussion of what happens next. what happens after a deal is made. you referred to the preliminary deal in november 2013. in january 2014, i was in switzerland for the world economic forum where president hassan rouhani made a debut to the world. there were industrial leaders, c.e.o.s, who couldn't wait to have meetings and talk about what happens when this economy of 80 million opens up. remember, rain is an asian country, you know, a far eastern country, but it is industrial. it is a manufacturing company, a mar

>>> i think that iran, russia, and china, are very, very serious about the non proliferation of this. russia has agreed to exsport the spent fuel, process it in russia, in order to help make this work. china has accepted major responsibility to be the lead, on a committee that will work to redid he sign the iraq reactor in a way that is acceptable to all of us. so china, they both have huge interests. and they both believe that the other componnorthbounds of the resolution, with respect to the arms thrown in, as a add on, as punt initial meant not because it referred directly to the nuclear part of the resolution or agreement. >> the resolution of the u.n. was a nuclear agreement and, in that regard, i think they would have serious reservations, about continuing. >> we'll go to daryl isa. >>> you're listening to our live continuing coverage of the house committee hearings on the iranian deal. >> libby the executive branch has always the purview of that's treaties and as i was listening about the testimony, i was thinking about the nixon and reagan, and the professor as we were going i

>> sure. >> russia oil, iran. what does it mean for russia? >> it's so interesting. you drive down the price of oil, it's bad for the oil producers. when you look at the oil producers around the world, the more oil that's out there, the more prices go down and hurts their own budgets and puts more pressure on them. which is interesting because russia has been aligned with iran on political issues. but the irony is it could drive down prices and hurt russia. >> maybe that's why russia wants to sell these arms that it will have the ability to sell to iran. >> and china too. they both see a very big market there for iran for their own very expensive high-tech equipment. it means again a different set of economics for every player here but a big big change a big change in the geeo political structure. developing some of the highest quality nutrition isn't easy so at gnc, why do we do it? why do we work to deliver clinically studied products to fill the world's nutrition gaps? why do we insist on the most stringent quality checks period? well, here's why... ♪ ♪ celebratin

it seems to me the winner here is russia which demanded and won on the lifting on iran's behalf of -- of these icbm sanctions. why did he concede on that? >> we didn't concede on that mr. chairman in fact we won a victory, because the -- we have seven nations negotiating three of the seven thought that the sanctions ought to be lifted immediately, iran russia and chaiina china. and four of them thought they shouldn't. and what we succeeded in doing was keeping both the arms embargo, and the missile component, the missiles for eight years, the arms for five years, notwithstanding the fact that iran has a very legitimate argument, which they were making that the u.n. resolution 1929 which is what created the sanctions and structure we were negotiating under, said that if iran comes to the table and negotiates, all of the sanctions would be lifted. now they didn't just come to the table to negotiate, they made a deal they signed an agreement, they came to an overall agreement. so they felt they were in compliance with the u.n. resolution, and we felt that their behavior in the region was

if we or our allies believe iran is cheating and we go to the u.n., we cannot be blocked by russia, china and iran alone or in combination. that's a pretty strong provision, and i think it's essential to the fabric of this agreement. we're not relying upon anything other than our own judgment as to whether or not they're cheating on this agreement. >> woodruff: general hayden how do you see this? >> actually a combination of the two views you just heard. i think it does do some really good things for a period of about a decade burks it does legit mate an industrial-strength iranian nuclear program. as we get to the sunset years, even assuming success across the board for the agreement, as we get to the sunset years, iran is very well positioned to break out if they choose to do so. >> reporter: dennis -- >> woodruff: dennis ross why isn't that a concern if it does wind iran down for a period of years and when it is over iran can wind back up again? >> i think it is a source of concern. i think the key is for 15 years you really are basically deferring what they can do when it comes to a n

instead there is managed access with iran russia and china, having a say in where national inspectors and can't go. the deal's 24-day process is a far cry from anywhere any time. and this provision expires too. while the administration has professed absolute knowledge about iran's program, it is a fact that we have been surprised by most every major nuclear development in iran's history, and iran has cheated on every agreement they have signed. so i ask, mr. secretary, has iran earned the right to be trusted? this deal guts the sanctions web that is putting intense pressure on iran. virtually all sanctions disappear, and where does all of that money go? to the largest terror network on earth. gone are the sanctions on iran's nuclear program, but also on the bad banks that have supported iran's terrorism and ballistic missile development. and to our dismay iran won a late concession to remove international restrictions on its ballistic missile program and convention alarms impairing the security of the region and our homeland. if this agreement goes through, iran gets a cash bah that s

iran could help, and this could give you an idea of the potential. russia's reserves are much lower than iran's, but it does produce much, much more. last year, 534 million tons. in comparison, i ran only produced 169 million tons. as you can see, huge room for improvement. but that is making for a tense talks in moscow between the oil cartel and vladimir putin. >> oil exporting countries are meeting to fix a common problem. the price of oil is already in the dumps, and iran wants to join in the game, but the secretary of opec general says he thinks prices -- secretary-general of opec says he thinks prices will stabilize going forward. >> in 2016, we expect stability in the oil market in the long term. >> the market is glutted already. off the coast of iran, floating tankers pumped with oil are just sitting, waiting to raise their anchors. if all of that oil floods the market, it could be tough for russia's economy. >> it's impacted by various factors. in particular, we can say with all confidence that reaching an agreement with iran and the six major nationa

iran could help and this could give you an idea of the potential. russia's reserves are much lower than iran's, but it does produce much, much more. last year, 534 million tons. in comparison, i ran only produced 169 million tons. as you can see huge room for improvement. but that is making for a tense talks in moscow between the oil cartel and vladimir putin. >> oil exporting countries are meeting to fix a common problem. the price of oil is already in the dumps, and iran wants to join in the game, but the secretary of opec general says he thinks prices -- secretary-general of opec says he thinks prices will stabilize going forward. >> in 2016, we expect stability in the oil market in the long term. >> the market is glutted already. off the coast of iran, floating tankers pumped with oil are just sitting, waiting to raise their anchors. if all of that oil floods the market it could be tough for russia's economy. >> it's impacted by various factors. in particular, we can say with all confidence that reaching an agreement with iran and the six major national

all, would it make sense instead of antagonising israel, saudi arabia, and those turning to russia instead of iran, and antagonising egypt, turning to russia, would it make sense to listen to them and not worry about iran. this is the problem. we don't have strategic balance in the middle east, we relied on allies not representing the majority of the populations whom they control, and turn to them, each though the allies in saudi arabia continue to arm fund and train jihadis across the region. osama bin laden, one of the first armed, trained and funded mosqued into the al qaeda, four morphing into d.a.e.s.h. >>> iran will continue to arm, train and fund hezbollah, no matter what agreement we reach with them on the nuclear deal. >> what iran does, that is important, that the united states will need to understand, if it wants a position in the middle east, is iran alliance itself with ipp convenient, but in -- inconvenient but indispensable populations, those that are marginalized. the most powerful thing that iran does is support the groups to participate in political processes in their own country

i would say iran right now presents long term the greatest threat. russia insisting iran but if you listen to the ayatollah he says several things. every military man should figure out how to help produce icbms, blis ig missiles that can reach the united states. he speak toss that issue, and they he leads people in a chant of death to america and death to israel. this assistance that so far we've seen russia give to iran has helped iran in its offensive capabilities and this is or concern in terms of our national security interests. >> what should the u.s. do? >> for one thing, i think in these negotiation, we have to make absolutely certain that inspectors have the right to go anywhere any time in iran to look at the nuclear program, including on military bases. that's where we've found them testing their bomb work before. russia has not been all that supportive in that but we need to insist upon this. second we should not give a signing bonus to iran of $150 billion until we are certain -- certain that they're not moving forward with a nuclear program. we

question, it's going to take international cooperation, whether as you mentioned saudi arabia israel, iran, russiaeverybody in the region, pakistan, the united states, europeans and -- that's my proposal. reinvigorate the united nations and see what we can come out of those discussions. >> certainly have chaos in the nation right now. and across north africa. libya, it's happening in libya. >> the way the nation is approaching the war on drugs isn't working. what do you believe is the best course of action to approaching? >> i don't to be honest, i want to listen to those people in the neighborhood. and as i said, the united nations is going to have next year a special general assembly on the issue, that's what should be happening. let's combine our collective thoughts. what has worked and what hasn't. many of the countries are banning that in the spring, they don't want it any more. it's a substitution, the common sense of, you can make more money doing one thing, it's going to be hard to substitute for something you're not. those have been the key of our approach to the drug trafficking. so i th

instead there is managed access with iran, russia and china having a say in where international inspectors can and can't go. the deal's 24 day process is a far cry from anywhere, any time. and this provision expires too. while the administration is professed absolute knowledge about iran's program it is a fact that we have been surprised by most every major nuclear development in iran's history. and iran has cheated on every agreement they have signed. so i ask, mr. secretary, has iran earned the right to be trusted? this deal guts the sanctions web that is putting intense pressure on iran. virtually all economic, financial and energy sanctions disappear. and where does all that money go? to the largest terror network on earth. gone are the sanctions on iran's nuclear program. but also on the bad banks that have supported iran easter ritual and ballistic missile development. and two our dismay iran won a late concession to remove international restrictions on its ballistic missile program and conventional arms imperilling the security of the region and our homeland. if this agreement goes

>> russia helping iran get out of sanctions. russia has iran as part of the axis.he talks about, oh, this is a good thing if we have a deal like this? >> don't forget, if iran finds a good deal with america and walks out of the sanction zone, the oil prices drop. having putin inside of these negotiation team, you know, it was a fundamental mistake, and we were shocked to hear time and again that this administration keeps repeating. we could deal with russia and iran in other issues. at the end of the day, having russia inside can't mean russia is going to help you. and a very, very brief comment about the big story of today's news about stealing this sensitive data from millions and millions of americans. that shows the fundamental flaw of obama foreign policy. weakness is not respected in the world these days. weakness is being punished. america looks weak. america looks pathetic. and that's why china, whoever, they believe they can go, you know, after millions and millions of files, steal them. neil: without repercussions. >> absolutely. neil: divine ignorance, t

world, yet his administration is a laughingstock all around the world, being played for a fool by iran, russia, china and the rest of the hemisphere. in his campaign, mr. obama presented himself as a great uniter. he's turned out to be the great divider. during his tenure, race relations have profoundly worsened, 6-10 americans say race relations in this country are bad. mr. obama promised his administration would be the most open and transparent. it has been the least such, defying congress and the news media and denying access to government records at an unprecedented rate and level. but his most frightening statement today, his claim that he could win a third term. why is it so frightening? because it's so much closer to the truth than anything else he said today. mr. obama and our national liberal media are allies, and 40% of the electorate follows obama, it seems blindly, all of whom seem to care little about the direction in which he is leading us all. the constitution is all that stands between this president and a third term, and frankly, i've never been more afraid that our constituti

>> that will drop the fuel costs, and one of the most damning things that one can do to iran. russia won't like it neither will venezuela but we're not in the business of granting favors to any of those countries. >> you don't think that iran is close to getting a nuclear weapon? >> yes, they are close. >> i don't think any of those things stop them from producing one. >> well certainly this agreement does nothing. >> if that's what you think, is there anything else that does? >> doubled a trebled sanctions can hurt them enough that gives them pause. the only thing that has a chance of improving the situation now is to radically increase the sanctions and get away from this very for a agreement. >> ambassador woolsey, thank you for joining us on the program. >> thank you. >> iran has shine a new light on prisoners in their prison. a missionary is 32 today, he has spent the last three birthdays in iranian prison accused of spying. bisi onile-ere spoke with his family in detroit. >> john, amir ahmadi's family had been fight forgiveries release. when the iran nuclear deal was announceed

instead there is managed access with iran, russia and china having a say in where international inspectors can and can't go. the deal's 24 day process is a far cry from anywhere, any time. and this provision expires too. while the administration is professed absolute knowledge about iran's program it is a fact that we have been surprised by most every major nuclear development in iran's history. and iran has cheated on every agreement they have signed. so i ask, mr. secretary, has iran earned the right to be trusted? this deal guts the sanctions web that is putting intense pressure on iran. virtually all economic, financial and energy sanctions disappear. and where does all that money go? to the largest terror network on earth. gone are the sanctions on iran's nuclear program. but also on the bad banks that have supported iran easter ritual and ballistic missile development. and two our dismay iran won a late concession to remove international restrictions on its ballistic missile program and conventional arms imperilling the security of the region and our homeland. if this agreement goes

russia. i understand there were some flights over the u.s. in u.s. air space. you have iranalked about. what's really the threat the biggest threat that we have to worry about? does the director have it right? >> well jamie, i'm at least glad that the administration no longer believes isis is the junior varsity al qaeda and that they're beginning to take this issue seriously. it is difficult to rank order these threats that have arizing under the obama administration whether it's the russians the iranians isis or al qaeda. the list is long. every one of these situations have gotten more dangerous for the american people. >> senator, i'm not going to put you on the spot but you have donald trump who is a presidential candidate down at the border and you have other republican candidates in various cities talking to people about various issues iowa new hampshire. does anyone strike you as being able to handle this many foreign threats if they were to be president? >> well jamie, the issues you have already cited, islamic states iran russia is a murderer's row of threats. i thin

it h highlights state threats russia, china, iran, north korean a. it focususes on extremistst organizations. it is clear about challenges. it is not nearly as clear about unpacking those challenges. there are important differences between the challenges russia presents in europe versus china and east asia. again, what we see with north korea and iran or violent extremist organizations, it's not unclear at all about unpacking those. i ink as both to coda and jerry have said, -- dakota and jerry have said, it's not really a strategy. it never really gets to the point. -- that point. >> i agree with what there is to like. clear articulation of the bad guys out there and the nature of challenges they present. what i didn't like was far more numerous. i think there is a hyper fixation on some kind of necessity for change, this transformation, a fixation on technological solutions invation. presuming that currently doing or the way the military is where it's at now in its professionalization, and all the toys that uses on a daily basis, somehow isn't meeti

is interested in iran having more armaments. russia could sell those arms to iran especially if the united states doesn't. russia is a player in this region. it's biggest ally around here is syria and syria is a very weakened player at the moment. to have a strong iran that has arms is useful for the russian federation. there are a lot of things going on here that are now dividing the p5 plus one or the six world powers negotiating in vienna and that might be slowing up the negotiations. other look at this more positively and say if we've gone down the list to the point we are discussing non-conventional or conventional arms and lifting the embargo on that, maybe we're in a good place. bottom line is we've missed the july 7 deadline. we are not going to have a negotiation or a deal that goes to congress for a 30 day up or down vote. congress is going to have 60 days to approve this. that causes other complications. iranians are not insisting a deal that isn't going to pass muster at home, by the supreme leader the ayatollah who has bee

could sell those arms to iran the other of course is that russia is a playerthis region, its biggest ally is syria, and syria is a very weakened player at the moment so to have a strong iran that has arms is useful for the russian federation. so there are a lot of things going on here that are dividing the six world powers negotiating in vienna, and that might be slowing up the negotiations. others say if we had gone down the list to the point where we're discussing conversion alarms, and lifting the embargo on that maybe we're in a good place. we have missed the july 7th deadline we're not going to have a deal that goes to congress for a 30-day up or down vote. congress will have 60 days to approve this. but iranians are not agreeing to a deal that isn't going to pass muster at home. in that means the supreme leader who has been consulted throughout this process. so that's where we stand. >>> ali velshi reporting from tehran. >>> the south carolina house of representatives began debate a short time ago on removing the confederate flag. the state senate alread

. >> reporter: the kremlin announced today that vladimir putin will meet with iran's president at a summit in russia as extended talks about iran's nuclear program endaryter a final phase next week. >> we'll discuss that and other foreign policy issues with the panel coming up. jennifer griffin at the pentagon thank you. >>> still ahead, senator marco rubio on whether he has enough experience to actually be president. >>> but first we'll meet a driver who actually wants to pay more in transportation taxes. want bladder leak underwear that moves like you do? try always discreet underwear and move, groove, wiggle giggle, swerve, curve. lift, shift, ride, glide hit your stride. only always discreet underwear has soft dual leak guard barriers to help stop leaks where they happen most and a discreet fit that hugs your curves you barely feel it. always discreet underwear so bladder leaks can feel like no big deal. because hey, pee happens. get your free pair and valuable coupons at always discreet.com >>> aaa is forecasting that 42 million americans will travel 50 miles or more from home this holiday week

russia. >> this is w50i8 we're focused so much on work looking at iran and a nuclear program to iran the new military adviser, he is focused on russia. brianna? >> besides russia what other countries is she concerned about? >> he did talk about concerns about china, north korea, and of course his concerns about isis which is where the bulk of u.s. military involvement is certainty directed these days. on the question of iran i should point out he also very much a the same page as the current chairman general marty dempsey. he says he will maintain a military option to strike iran if the president were to order such a strike. brianna? >> barbara starr, thank you so much. joining me we have senator murphy of connecticut, a member of the foreign relations committees. thank you so much for being with us. >> sure. >> you just heard the nominee for the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff saying russia is his main concern at this point. do you agree with that? >> that's music to putin's ears. much of his entire strategy is designed to be as much of a stick in the eye to the american government as

everyone's laughing at us china, russia iran. and that's just my personal opinion. and we're just becoming a weak nation and everyone knows that, and we're no longer considered a super power. >> on our support line is sharon in hellortown, pennsylvania. go ahead. >> thank you for taking my call. i have to disagree with the lady who just spoke about us no longer being a superpower. i hate to say this but i'm -- i really believe that the united states is part of the problem. i support this deal i think it's important. i don't want to be alienated from our allies who have been our allies since we signed a declaration of independence. it's important that we accept this deal. >> why is it -- >> and i'm also tired of the influence of the israeli government. i'm really disgusted with it. and we must agreen of this deal. >> thanks for your call. next is rose. rose is calling from normal, illinois. she's opposed. >> caller: yes, hi. yes, i sat and watched the whole thing. and while i was watching it, i called a bunch of my friends and just different people. and i asked if th

is it iran, isn't russia, or is it isis? iran russia, were isis? who believes it is iran? o believes it is russia? and who believes it is isis? so i preface this -- ok. who believes it is china? returning to isis they know of your expertise on health care and that would be what they would expect, but leadership requires you to know a lot more issues than just the one in your expertise you'd is 3:00 a.m. in that phone call comes and it is about a challenge to america's safety and security, and the threat is isis. what does the next president need to do now so that phone call never comes? mr. carson: that is a very good question. what exactly is going on in the world right now is quite different than what was going on before. in 2003, for instance, when we invaded iraq and al qaeda was a big deal, there are many people who were not totally on board with that because they did not see where that was a significant threat to our national security. i could be one of those people, because i was not very enthusiastic. however, we are facing now a completely different situation. we h

. >>> let's get more now on the iran nuclear deal. russia is a key ally of iran.e is the russian foreign minister's reaction to the agreement. >> translator: with regard to the arms embargo, we along with china called for it to be among the first restriction measures to be lifted but our iranian colleagues agreed to the compromise, because the west initially insisted on keeping the arms embargo for eight or even ten years. in the end a compromise has been reached, which we supported along with china, baring in mind that iron was fine with it. within a five-year period arms delivery to iran is possible. >>> emma hayward has more now. >> this deal has been welcomed by russia with vladimir putin saying the world can breathe a sigh of relief. he said the partners made a hard choice. his foreign minister said he hoped arms delivery to tehran will be possible within the next five years if approved by the u.n. and he has been involved in this whole process, going back and forth between moscow and wherever the talks have been taking place. pressing for a deal. pressing fo

china is desperate to buy iran's oil. russiaas already negotiated to sell at nuclear power reactors, and the french foreign minister scheduled a trip to tehran this week to do what that country's diplomats always do, promote france's corporate interests. it's worth recalling that when the obama administration was putting together the last round of u.n. sanctions against iran, many republicans dismissed the effort. in an august 2009 op ed in the "wall street journal" titled "sanctions won't work against iran," the bush administration's ambassador to the u.n., john bolton, argued they'd never go along with such sanctions and if they did it wouldn't change iran's behavior anyway. now iran says these same sanctions are wondrously effective if only the administration would keep them on indefinitely. the crucial reasons the sanctions have been so effective, more than critics expected, is they are comprehensive, including china, russia and europe. there is a profound gap between america and the world in the perception of these sanction

>> there's a procedure in place but it doesn't rely on iran or russia or china saying yes. >> so iran is wrong when they say we won't have access to military sites? >> no they are taking care of a domestic constituency in the way they feel they need to -- >> thank you. >> what they say is not as important as what they do. >> i will remind the members, we have five members. ask the question and give enough time for a response. >> mr. chairman -- >> what we are going to do is have a response for the record. we are going to go to mr. brad sherman of california. >> we have to remember that this is not a binding deal. this is not a treaty. this is not binding on iran. this is not binding on the united states. it's not even an executive legislative agreement and these question here are not even asking for congress to approve the deal. i think they would appreciate it if we didn't pass a formal resolution of disapproval. it might be at most morally binding on this administration. so what may be important for us is to look to see whether it's a good deal in the next couple of years, because i

on top of that we're negotiating alongside china and russia who want to sell arms to iran.crazy. go back to sanctions. >> jonas. >> it's been working since 1979. they can't even get a real american flag to burn because you can't buy stuff in the country. it's like cuba. it doesn't lead to anything except black markets. let businesses build, let them do trade, then punish them with a high tariff if things aren't going the way we want. the sanction creates a black economy and makes the people hate america more. they blame their problem and troubles cutting them off from goods and services. a fairer system is what you do with a normal country like china where you have tariffs. >> gary b. 20 seconds? >> suzy made the best point. sanctions are working or maybe john did, that's why they're at the table. let's keep them up. >> thanks guys. thank you, emily, for join us. we appreciate it. remember this? >> if the science hasn't changed by now it never will. but in democracy it's not them that carries the day. it is normal human beings that haven't put their stake in to politics abo

is alive with iran russia and china. this has divided the security counsel permanent members who are the main negotiators along with the european union and germany. it's created problems with the drafting now as it gets later and later in the afternoon, back in the states, it becomes very difficult for there to be a formal announcement from president rohani in tehran because they are going to have a big presidential statement on television in the middle of the night. it's not done there. it's hardly done unless there's a dire emergency in the u.s. as well. so if this were to be a coordinated announcement president obama, president rouhani, announcements here with john kerry, that's the way it rolled out in switzerland, this is what you would expect in these meetings after the meetings in vienna with a permanent desession. we've had meetings today but they've been brief. you haven't had a plenary session with all of the players together. that's not going to happen until they have something to actually accept or they have

and iran pushed for, the ability for russia to transfer this technology, this is what russia would like to do transfer this technology to the regime. at that same hearing our top military official gave his best military advice. quote, under no circumstances should we relieve the pressure on iran, unquote, when it comes to the arms embargo. but that comes off in just five years. on the critical issue of inspections, just a few months ago secretary of energy moniz said that, quote we expect to have anywhere any time access, unquote. but anywhere any time has weakened to something called managed access. managed access more accurately should be called manipulated access as any process with russia, china and iran at the table will be treated exactly that way. it will be managed. it will be manipulated. the inspection regime will be manipulated by those with something to hide. and this has been the past experience with iran that has cheated on every agreement so far. we might feel better if the united states was able to permanently c

. >> what do you make of the state department dealing with iran russia and is describeing non-stop work dealing with e-mails that should have been turned over by hillary clinton years ago? >> we don't know if hillary clinton has turped over all of the e-mails yet. as seen in the fact there were 60 new e-mails that we got that we had not previously had. 15 of them had never been turned over by ms. clinton to the state department and the state department was holding some of them. why didn't we get those? >> thank you very much for being with us. they are busy at the statement department with thousands of e-mails to go through. they are doing them in pieces and drip drip drip. >> fox news alert. more to come on this. there have been multiple explosions and attacks overseas and egypt is blowing up in parts. that is this. plus there is this: >> we have to fight like hell. but we are going to make the country great again. if i get elected i will make this country great again. >> big promises from presidential hopeful donald trump but are his words having an impact in iowa where it will count?

iran? visit russia? or is it isis? iran, russia our isis. who believes it is iran? please applaud. use] who believes it is russia? [applause] and to believes it is isis? [applause] so i preface this so i preface this -- okay. who believes it is a china? [applause] returning to isis -- [laughter] me know of your expertise on health care and i would be there we expect i would go. but leadership requires you to a lot more issues than just the one issue greatest expertise. it's 3 a.m. and that phone call comes, and it's about a challenge to american safety and security and the threat is isis. what does the next president need to do now so that, that phone call never comes? >> that's a very good question because what in fact is going on in the world right now is quite different than what was going on before. in 2003 for instance, when we invaded iraq and al-qaeda was a big deal there were many people who are not totally on board with it because they didn't see what that was a significant threat to our national security. and i could be one of those people because i wasn't very enthusiasti

it was an agreement not between britain and iran and russia and iran. really an agreement between united states and iran. it was not the other foreign ministers, it was john kerry, our secretary of state. don't make a mistake that it was between the world and iran. it was really between the united states and iran. and i think i understand the british officials position. but the fact of the matter is it was a u.s./iran agreement. >> we are learning more about what was going on in the room. who backed out and that will come to light in the next several months we expect. this having to do with again, the agreement is not passed by law makers let's take a listen. >> if this agreement is not meeting congress' approval and the sanctions are gone and iran goes back to >[prxenriching, you can hear the cry right now. what are we going to do about it. here is the prime minister of israel calling us up. time to bomb. >> if law makers don't get behind the deal and things fall apart it would be a military option, is that it? >> of course not. the sanctions are not o

iran? is it russia? or is it isis? iran, russia, or isis? who believes it is iran? please applaud. edium applause] who believes it is russia? --[medium-loud applause] and who believes it is isis? [loud applause] shall i preface this -- ok? who believes it is china? [medium-loud applause] returning to isis -- [laughter] they know of your expertise on health-care and that is where it -- they would expect me to go but leadership requires you to know a lot more issues than the one of your greatest expertise. it is 3:00 a.m. and that phone call comes and it is about the challenge to america's safety and security and the threat is isis. what does the next president need to do now? so that phone call never comes. dr. carson: that's a great question because what is going on in the world right now is quite different than before. in 2003, for instance, when we invaded iraq and al qaeda was a big deal, there were many people who were not totally on board with that because they did not see where that was a significant threat to our national security. i could be one of those people because i was

instead there is managed access with iran, russia and china having a say in where international inspectors can and can't go. the deal's 24 day process is a far cry from anywhere, any time. and this provision expires too. while the administration is professed absolute knowledge about iran's program, it is a fact that we have been surprised by most every major nuclear development in iran's history. and iran has cheated on every agreement they have signed. so i ask, mr. secretary, has iran earned the right to be trusted? this deal guts the sanctions web that is putting intense pressure on iran. virtually all economic, financial and energy sanctions disappear. and where does all that money go? to the largest terror network on earth. gone are the sanctions on iran's nuclear program. but also on the bad banks that have supported iran easter ritual and ballistic missile development. and two our dismay, iran won a late concession to remove international restrictions on its ballistic missile program and conventional arms imperilling the security of the region and our homeland. if this agreement goe

arms embargo on iran. russia wants it removed.sh and bill clinton get together for a good cause and a chat and only one subject was off-limits -- bush and clinton. the former presidents spoke yesterday in dallas. there was no talk of bush's brother running for president against clinton's wife. both said it is a drag to get old. >> find people, who inspire hope. clinton and i are getting a little long in the tooth these days. [laughter] >> there is one month of the year when he is older than me. brendan: the leadership scholars program is sponsored by the centers of bush, clinton, and lyndon johnson. "the wall street journal" says the sports media giant is tightening its belt. more than 3 million people dropped espn in the last year. yesterday it was announced they would be parting ways with anchor keith olbermann. espn has been forced to pay more to win rights to broadcast sports. tom: and lebron james did not stay a free agent for too long. he will be returning to cleveland. they signed a two-year deal for $47 million. next summe