and that includes jeffrey hinton, a leading machine learning pioneer. he's known as the godfather of a i. he says it's time to put the brakes on a i while we still can't we scientists, right? we're exploring what happens when you train lodge neural nets on computers. and that's just reality that we ended up here. um, it's one of those things where there's no way that people want going to explore it . um, the issue is now that we've discovered it works better than we expected a few years ago. um, what do we do to mitigate the long term risks of um, it things more intelligent than us taking control. the question there when a bring, you know, lindsey gordon, she's a senior fellow for emerging technologies at the alliance for securing democracy in washington dc. and it's good to see you again jeffrey hinton. he wants us to slow down. he has joined a growing course of ai experts. we're calling for a moratorium on a i development and deployment. where do you stand on this? well, i think, i think that he speaks to a very real concern that a i, systems are prog

we're talking of course of dignity, psychologist and computer scientists. jeffrey hinton, who recently told the b b, c and i code right now they are not more intelligent than us as far as i can tell. but i think they soon may be and we need to worry about that. felix, should we be worried when it comes to a i and a journalism, especially if it's a self learning system as to really hard question. lessing as lot of elements and there which we have to untangle of some sort. i'm personally, i'm not a computer scientists on the other. people are much smarter than me have from the interviews on if we will have artificial general intelligence, which is really what jeffrey hinton is alluding to. i'm personally on everything i know about this, much more skeptical. i don't think we will see conscious machines any time soon. i think we are to your question about the dangers and again, it really depends on, on where you sort of look at and in some context. yes, we clearly have to be careful how the systems are being used regardless of if they are learning or not. so i'm take error is being produce

it's good to see you again jeffrey hinton. he wants us to slow down. he has joined a growing course of ai experts. we're calling for a moratorium on a i development and deployment. where do you stand on this? well, i think, i think that he speaks to a very real concern that a i, systems are progressing rapidly more quickly than anyone really expected a couple years ago. the idea that we could train large language models such as chopping g p t and have it display what we think of as intelligent asks and capability is not something we really saw. and i think that's cause a little bit of a panic um too. and in the community to say, you know, how revolving this technology, where's it going can to get ahead of humans? i don't think we're there yet. and certainly there, these are capability that looked like intelligence. i'm and maybe moving in that direction, of course. but i don't think we're necessarily at the point where a i is taking over humans. but there are real concerns with how these systems are going to be used and how they are, are already being

from the interviews on if we will have artificial general intelligence, which is really what jeffrey hinton is alluding to. i'm personally on everything i know about this, much more skeptical. i don't think we will see conscious machines any time soon. i think we are to your question about the dangers and again, it really depends on, on where you sort of look at and in some context. yes, we clearly have to be careful how the systems are being used regardless of if they are learning or not. so i'm take areas being produced by something like chassis bt . if you sort of lap at blues on producing gymnast a copy of some sorts on the errors of creep into the file outfits. and no one checks that that is a big problem that has nothing to do with the system or the intelligence of the system itself. it's more the way it's being used and if there's some sort of oversight, ah, there's other elements where this also applies. but generally, so the system itself is relevant, but it's much more important to look hurts. and the way it's being employed in jolissa context and, and he's organization and the ch

but they still make the. >> that was jeffrey hinton.l financial markets largely welcomed the news that public u.s. bank first republic would not be in the hands of j.p. morgan. event was scooped up -- the bank was scooped up in a deal brokered by u.s. regulars. first republican bent under pressure since last -- had been under pressure since last month. we are just days away from king charles's coronation. let's skip the formalities and get to the food. with the new monarch, comes a new menu for the street parties. coronation keisha is the official- coronation quiche is the official --. dish. >> served a decade the coronation chicken for queen elizabeth, her son has opted for this savory chart bursting with spinach and green beans. when we were the filling in, it will not get started. for some top tips, we headed to this bakery in london. >> how much cheese? >> two handfuls. when you transfer it to the oven, you do not what the next to come over. >> but for the ultimate coronation fees, there is so much more than quiche on the menu. we d

i want to pick up on that last thought from jeffrey hinton. right now, they are not more intelligent than us, as far as i can tell. i think soon, maybe. does that scare you or excite you? >> a little bit of both, i think. it's very exciting from a researcher's perspective. this is something we have been working towards for a long time, making these machines intelligent in this way. the right of progress is a little bit scary. the last two years, i would say, we have seen amazing developments with that. that is a little bit scary. but i am not yet losing too much sleep over it. i think it's not quite at the stage that i am really, really concerned about it, but i do think we need to be careful about how we deal with this, and i think having more public debates like this is a useful part of that discussion. ben: i want to come onto the education element in just a second, because that will play a key role here. but when you talk about the benefits and risks, where is the balance right now? do the benefits still, at the moment, outweigh the risks?

jeffrey hinton recently resigned from the a.i. team at google.e he is. >> what we want is some way of making sure that even if they're smarter than us, they're going to do things that are beneficial for us. that's called the alignment problem. but we need to try and do that in a world where there's bad actors that want to build robot soldiers to kill people. it seems very hard to me. >> one gentle example, a.i.-generated images of pope francis in a puffer jacket. which raises the question, how dangerous could a.i. be in spreading information, whether it's committing fraud, whether it's interfering in our elections, whether it's invading our privacy? >> let's identify, first and foremost, the pope absolutely slayed in that outfit. so i guess we know something about a.i. having taste. but no, in all seriousness, look, this is real. like any new technology, it is a tool. what i expect to emphasis is a kind of fingerprinting. so when it is trivial to be able to create a million different variations of, say, a head of state saying a sentence, and it s

. >>> after a decade on google's team for artificial intelligence, jeffrey hinton said he resigned toely about the technology, saying it's quickly becoming smarter than humans. you left your job at google because you want to focus solely on your concerns about ai. you've said it could ma nip late or possibly figure out a way to kill humans? how could it kill humans? >> if it gets to be much smarter, it will gain manipulation because it will have learned that from us. so it would be a more intelligent thing being controlled by a less intelligent thing. it can figure out ways of manipulating people to do what it wants. >> what do we need to do, pull the plug, put in far more restrictions and back stops on this? how do we solve this problem? >> it's not clear to me that we can solve this problem. i believe we should put a big effort into thinking about ways to solve the problem. i don't have a solution presently. i just want people to be aware that this is a really serious problem and we need to be thinking about it very hard. i don't think we can stop the progress. i didn't stein the pe

but part of the issue is that sometimes when figures like jeffrey hinton talk about, you know, a super intelligent a i that has this power seeking behavior. we lose sight of some of the, the more immediate near term dangers with a i, things about how to keep, for example, chat box like chat, g, p, t, a more honest and trustworthy and, and less toxic. you know, the scary thing actually to me and, and too many figures about artificial intelligence is that you don't really know how malicious actors are going to use the technology until you've put it out into the world. and that raises some really difficult questions about what sort of processes might need to be in place before companies release these models into the wild conversations that aren't yet happening. are often seeing these models being put out into the market place. and then these difficult lessons being learned after the fact. and there may be a conversation now to reverse that find to think costa rica face sloths. that could be the key to discover new antibiotics. a team has been researching the firm and found unique bacteria

joining us now is jeffrey hinton. thank you very much for joining me.ou didn't leave google in order to criticize google. you left in order to speak out specifically about the dangers of ai that you see in the offing. what are the dangers that you want to warn everyone about? >> there are lots of known dangers like manipulating electorates and putting people out of work, but that's not what i want to talk about. what i want to talk about is the existential threat that these things will get to be much smarter than us and they'll take over and take control, and i've started worrying about that because i came to the conclusion that the intelligence created from the chat bots are very different from the biological intelligence that we have. >> i am curious if i can push you on that further because i wondered what the tipping point was for you when you realized that this was dangerous. what was it that changed your view? >> okay. for about 50 years i've been trying to build models on computers that would help me understand how the brain learns and it's alway

jeffrey hinton, who joins me from london. thank you for being with us. what are you free to express now about artificial intelligence that you could not express freely when you were employed by google? >> it was not that i could not express it freely when i was employed by google. it is that inevitably, if you work for a company, you tend to self censor. you tend to think about the impact it will have on the company. i want to be able to talk about what i now perceive us the risks of super intelligent ai without having to think about the impact on google. >> what are those risks, as you see it? >> there are quite a few different risks. there's the risk of producing a lot of fake news so nobody knows what is true anymore. there's the risk of encouraging polarization by getting people to click on things that make them indignant. there's the risk of putting people out to work. it should be that we make things more productive. when we greatly increase productivity, it helps everybody, but there's a worry it might just help the risk. then there's the risk i w

as he is known, jeffrey hinton, left google the last week.id the idea that this stuff, a.i., could actually get smarter than people, a few people believed that. but most people thought it was way off and i thought it was way off. i thought it was 30 to 50 years, longer away. obviously, i know longer think that. you said maybe we have to take changes. this letter talks about pausing things. this is what google's ceo, right, where hinton worked, sunday darpy chr told me in 2019 about slowing down on a.i. if they have to. here's what he said. >> you are basically saying we have to weigh our technological advancement and competitiveness with what it americans for humanity? >> absolutely. you know, i think it's important and i think it's important. it's what society expects us to do. >> that was then. this is now. should google slow it down? and the competitors? >> well, jeffrey hinton is, you know, he won the torino award, the nobel prize of computer science. i would die for that. i got one close to it. but so -- and these people that were involv

these people, including jeffrey hinton, the godfather of artificial intelligence and sam altman, the creator of catgp, pointed out and called for addressing the risks associated with artificial intelligence as a global priority, along with other risks at the level of society, such as epidemic diseases and nuclear wars. in an interview with the lawyer of the nouri case, the swedish newspaper wrote that he spent 2,270 days in a 7-meter cell , which is 24 days more than the previous record in this case of hamid nouri, an iranian citizen who was arrested at the airport three and a half years ago when he arrived in stockholm, and so far the basis of the claims of the members of the group of hypocrites is that they are under arrest. this is the voice of hamid nouri, an iranian citizen who has been imprisoned in solitary confinement in sweden for 42 months, but i wanted to contact his father. we have not met him for 25 months. november 18, 1997 after entering the swedish airport for false reasons is arrested and the swedish court of first instance sentenced any person on the charge of parti

earlier this week we spoke with jeffrey hinton who recently left his position at google, warning of thegers of generative ai development. this is what he said. >> there are a lot of things people talked about to do with being able to produce lots of text automatically so you can get lots of very effective spambots. it would allow authoritarian leaders to manipulate their electrics, things like that. reporter: what do you think of that? >> those kinds of concerns are the reason this administration has focused on managing the risks of ai. we know it can be used for good but first we have to deal with exactly these kinds of issues. reporter: what is your biggest concern? >> the power of the technology is its breath. -- breadth. it can be used in creative the debtor -- endeavors but dangerous ways in other applications and that is why given the breadth of the technology that the administration has focused on imaging these risks. reporter: after a conversation with the ceos today are you confident that they also understand the risks? >> we had a very open conversations with them and i think

. >> steve: jeffrey hinton. >> brian: jeffrey hinton says this is accelerating so much faster than he thought. he thought we had 50 years before these things were smarter than us and possibly dominate us. we basically have 50 meals. >> ainsley: neil degraff says we are moving on. think about g.p.s. can you get to grandma's house how to get to grandma's house without any traffic and no interaction from human beings. he said that is a form of a.i. we just have to go with it. he says he welcomes it and always because it can make our lives better. >> steve: absolutely. i'm sure in medicine it's going to save lives. >> ainsley: if they could find out a cure of cancer. >> steve: already figured out a cure to have one kind of cancer they are going to do trials on. it can create these, to brian's point about the poem, it can create these deep fakes that have so realistic. that's one of the reasons why the writers guild of america is on strike because what wants to stop, you know, one of these late night hosts from across the street just give me 15 jokes about donald trump. >> brian: no one wi

pioneers now says part of him regrets his role in creating it. 75-year-old computer scientist jeffrey hintonays he quit his job at google so we can independently share his concerns about ai technology, which include fears over this and stealing human jobs, but also go far beyond that. >> what do we do to mitigate the long-term risks of things more intelligent than us taking control? it eclipses him by a long way. it does already do simple reasoning. given the rate of progress, we expect things to get better quite fast. so we need to worry about that. reporter: it's just the latest warning that tech companies might be creating a monster they can't control. in march, after open ai release the latest model of its chat bought, gpd four, within 1000 people from the tech industry, including billionaire elon musk and apple cofounder steve wozniak signed a letter calling for a pause on ai development while the risks are properly studied. >> ai is a tool. technology is not mutual, but we can shape it the way we want to shape it. we need to stop being driven by profit, by competition, and just place t

jeffrey hinton, who helped pioneer ai, recently left google to warn ai is growing too fast do you believe that artificial intelligence, as it grows at this pace, poses an existential threat to humans >> yes, i think it's possible. >> reporter: ai is already reinventing science, medicine, and music, but also producing fake news, photos, and videos, potentially undermining democracies, even replacing humans in critical jobs. at the white house today, four top tech ceos meeting with the vice president about ai's promise and peril. >> it's definitely going to be a challenge, but it's one i'm sure we can handle >> reporter: not anticipating photos of today's summit, we told ai to create an image of the meeting, underscoring the threat, this is what it created this is not a real photo. it was created by an ai program with the names of people attending, including presidident biden.n. >> has enonormous potentntial and enenormous dadanger >>>> reporter:r: late today, real video from the white house. >> our job is to make sure that we do seize the benefits, and we have to start by mitigating the ri

jeffrey hinton is leaving the post of vice president of google and on this occasion gave a fairly frankcording to him. now he can speak out without looking back at his post in the corporation, he considers it his duty to share concerns about the direction and, most importantly, at what pace neural networks are developing . digital artists abledofieldgen or jorly in the near future will cause a real avalanche of disinformation, and no one will be able to understand where the truth is, and where is the reality created by the neural network. in addition, according to the scientist, advanced models of artificial intelligence will not only take over part of the routine work , but because of it some of the jobs will increase the likelihood of creating fully autonomous weapons and tend to adopt bad manners. the trait is not the best examples of behavior from those sets the data on which they are trained at the same time, hinton believes that some of these threats are still purely theoretical, however, he is worried that the race of those technologies in this area that has begun, which without

company of the potentially disruptive effect, the rapid growth on established over the among them jeffrey hintonling into the all of these themes are likely that will take place when the leaders of four of the kamala harris president biden has said in the that this kind of technology doesn't cause harm to people, the technology for making in the white calls harmful effects of and the measures. the announcement of the meeting comes as shares of several major education companies fell on tuesday, as evidence showed that al bots such as chatgpt could be stealing business. the online education company, chegg, saw its share price plunge almost 50%, shaving nearly a billion dollars off its value. essence shares in london were hit extremely hard. live now to vishal gupta, a professor of data sciences at the university of southern california's marshall school of business. have to pay quite a bit of money to subscribe to chegg and peirson, are they severely challenged by chat beauty and others? i challenged by chat beauty and others? ., , , others? i do believe they represent _ others? i do believe they r

a pioneer of technology has quit his job at google so he can speak freely about its dangers. jeffrey hinton told the new york times that a eyes capacity to create convincing false images and text is creating a world where people will not be able to know what is true. he says, competition between at tech giants is pushing them to release new technologies at dangerous speeds. that's it for me for now. can my more information on a website, al jazeera dot com, the weather is up next. the inside story with examine how much of a threat sedans conflict is to chad, to stay with ah, let's get going with your weather outside for h. i thank you so much for joining him. we've set record low temperatures for the month of may and him alt show pradesh in the northwest of india $8.00 degrees. typically this time the year we should see a lot more reads on the map which would indicate much higher temperatures. storms who this area is wall punjab state delhi right in. so to production a water view of india will show us also storms toward the east as well. stretching from west bank all into town will now do an

be biased and beat manipulated this week jeffrey hinton, who was known as the godfather of a.

jeffrey hinton retired from google saying he now regretted his work.t can drop lesson plans and help with marking, freeing up teachers to spend more time with their pupils. the head teachers are forming an advisory group to help schools manage both the opportunities and threats presented by ai. in the interest of students and educators and the group says it will not be pushed around by tech giants. let's return now to hiroshima and the g7 summit. i'm joined now by dr tristen naylor, professor of international politics and history at the university of cambridge. he looks at political summits and diplomacy, including g7. he's at the summit in hiroshima. great to have you with us. it is fair to say all eyes have very much been on president zelensky. how important do you think it is he was able to attend in person because there is a lot of speculation about that. essentially, do you think he gets more from allies and other leaders when he is able to look them in the face and say we need more support and we need more weapons?— need more weapons? absolutely.

conversations respond to emotions, write stories, and various styles, and even compose music. jeffrey hinton is one of the pioneers of a technology. he recently quit his job at google speak out about it's dangerous. he wants a, i could replace millions of jobs we do to motion, but i think it's gonna be huge. increase the productivity. my worry is those increasing productivity. you're going to go to putting people out of work and making the rich richer and the for, for as you do that, as you might like, got bigger society is more move on in march. moving to 1000 technique is signed and open left to cooling for 6 months, more tory, him on development, owning the race to advance a guy is out of control. there are no independent safety protocols. and some analysts question where the texans can be relied on to make ethical decisions. they have a profit motive, and this motive doesn't necessarily align with some of the very tough decisions that may need to be made about a i. and that doesn't really square up with the needs of a company that has, is responsible to its shareholders. suppose is if a

jeffrey hinton, a leading figure in artificial intelligence, has resigned from his job at google andt is technology that involves computers carrying out tasks which humans are used to doing such as a self driving cars. as to hinton, who spent his career researching ai, says he is now concerned there is a serious risk the technology will get out of control. ai is already part of our lives, from health care options to insurance quotes, movie streaming recommendations to photo filters. but is it getting to powerful? too fast. there will be the most famous ai tool of the moment is chatgpt. i decided to ask it how to make this report for you tonight. this is what it said. it says remember to keep the introduction concise, clear and engaging as it sets the tone for the rest of the report. i will do my best! what is it? a! is an umbrella term computer system trained to do tasks that traditionally humans have done. until recently it has been known as good at us as doing things but that's all changed because it is developing superfast. what are the benefits? the tech giants are competing like

others think it's destructive and that includes the godfather of ai, doctor jeffrey hinton, he just clicked job at google and he told the new york times he regressed the work he's done developing the technology. it's hard to see how you can prevent bad actors from using it for bad things and i'm sitting here saying what do they know that i don't? i'm not scared of artificial intelligence. the open letter and marsha called for the six-month pause, 27000 people signed the letter, 27000 people who know about this stuff in there saying slowdown. stuart: later in the show, only to editorialize about the causing of ai development, i said it's about thing because you don't know what the bad guys are doing in secret. >> you don't know what china is doing because they are not pausing. stuart: arrays on ai and i want our guys to win. look who's here to cover the market for us, i want to know if you got any idea what ai will do for apple's earnings thursday is it effective for apple? >> the report this week, they would love to see what apples big move will be but i don't think we will see it. apple ha

we spoke to the godfather of ai, jeffrey hinton, who spoke about the dangers, especially of authoritarian and the democratic party for many years said the internet is going to democratise china. the internet is going to create a liberal society in china and of course, the opposite has happened. they've used the internet to secure their totalitarian state in ways george orwell could never have imagined and the stuff they've already used which you couldn't have imagined, i telecommunications equipment, they put in place to be able to see whether people notjust in beijing but in africa are having a bad day. when you put al on top of that, totalitarian, in human history, has never seen the kind of capability that xi jinping and putin are going to have at their disposal. it should be a real worry. 0ur concern in addition to worrying about that should be making sure that we are using ai in a way that is consistent with our fundamental values. thank you so much for the conversation. thanks for having me, i'd appreciate it. stay with us here on bbc news. hello there. it's quite tricky trying to p

powerful are the big names who signed in agreement, including sam altman who is behind chatgpt and jeffrey hinton who is called the godfather of artificial intelligence. >> in then it became a lot easier. we were not anticipating getting many industry leaders. zach: industry leaders include high-level executives at microsoft and google and hundreds of other experts. dan hendricks. >> we are in an ai arms race. companies are needing to compete with each other and develop ai as quickly as possible and they have put development of ai more powerful over making it safe, understandable and transparent. >> he says the risks run deeper. >> another possibility is that we automate some much of the economy and the world is more autonomously run and we don't know how to do things. and we are completely subject to them always doing your bidding. if they turn in another direction or pursue something else, we would be powerless to correct it. zach: sent has a tax expert also signed the statement saying hit makes sense that others decided to do the same as they may want to wash their hands of responsibility. >>

this was signed by the ceo of openai, behind chatgpt, and jeffrey hinton, called the godfather of artificialaring from the director for the center of ai safety. >> the other possibility is we automate so much of the economy that basically the world is more autonomously run. we become very dependent and we are subject to them always doing our bidding. if they turn in another direction or pursue something else, then it would be powerless to correct it. kumasi: he is hoping the statement can lead to other leaders and policymakers recognizing the severity of the risk of this technology. reggie: federal leaders are expected to give more information about unknown flying objects in our sky, including illegal unacknowledged black budget projects related to ufo operations in washington, d.c. several top-secret whistleblowers will have test money. they witnessed a man-made unidentified aerial phenomenon, offloading illegal weapons and drugs in indonesia and 2009. coming up, the airline asking passengers to step on a scale before the board. kumasi: and the new york stock exchange, we are down about 160

. ♪♪ caroline: let's talk artificial intelligence with jeffrey hinton -- geoffry hinton leaving googleoining his voice to a growing chorus warning about ai. the deep minded ceos set down with bloomberg originals talking about how the industry is not only losing people but attracting a lot of talent. listen. >> i would say it's an incredibly dynamic field right now. all sorts of things happening, research going on. literally in the last six months probably hundreds of thousands of people, talented engineers and others, have gotten into the field. i think they have come from many other fields and decided that maybe they were not interested in ai until recently, but they decided that this is a great growth point. that has brought in a a lot of energy to the space, a lot of dynamic ideas. so, even for us who are right in the middle of it it is hard to keep track of all of that at once. you have to take into account and look at the main trends and threats and focus on that, i would say. it is almost like you need an ai system to help you keep track of all of the developments that are going

jeffrey hinton says he partly regrets his work because of the risks it poses to society.ndwork for artificial intelligence that event actually led to the creation of popular chat bots and other advanced systems. the 75-year-old says he resigned so he could speak openly about the risks of unrestrained ai development. by 8 point margin voters overall are more likely to believe a.i. is a wad thing for society than a good thing. those familiar with a.i. likely to say it's a good thing by 8 point spread according to fox news poll released tonight. parents in northern virginia are upset about plans to convert a handful of public school rest rooms into gender neutral facilities. loudoun county is scheduled to remodel facilities of at least five schools. chief weaght correspondent mike emanuel has details. >> loudoun county virginia public schools are planning to spend at least $11 million on a pilot program creating floor to ceiling bathroom stalls in five high schools to accommodate transgender students. some parents gave the school board an earful. >> only 66 out of 82,000 stu

we spoke to the godfather of ai, jeffrey hinton, who spoke about the dangers of inns like authoritariank of that? i regulated here. what think of that? l think _ regulated here. what think of that? l think we _ regulated here. what think of that? i think we are _ regulated here. what think of that? i think we are in - regulated here. what think of that? i think we are in an i that? i think we are in an competition with authoritarianism and there is, you know, we said, american politicians and the democratic party for many years said the internet is going to democratise china. the internet is going to create a liberal society in china and of course, the opposite has happened. they've used the internet to secure their totalitarian state in ways george orwell could never have imagined and the stuff they've already used which you couldn't have imagined, i telecommunications equipment, they put in place to be able to see whether people not just be able to see whether people notjust in beijing but in africa are having a bad day. when you put ai africa are having a bad day. when you put al on

agencies be it's brutal but similar lists being compiled at other wall street firms meanwhile, jeffrey hintonhe godfather of a.i., is raising alarm bells again, saying it could be a bigger threat to humanity than even climate change we've heard before from lots of important people with a lot of knowledge in this space this rhetoric. >> a lot of knowledge in the space. we joke about how there's all these really big, exciting, you know, ideas about a.i. and it turns out it just helps people file more legal claims and do better advertising it just doesn't seem so sinister when it is performing, you know, those essential functions for society. >> unless you think that those functions are going to end up creating a lot of unemployment and -- >> yeah. >> -- rendering certain business models completely defunct. there is both the sides. this is understandable some of the people who raise the fears will argue on the other side, that at least they're being raised now, where other technologies have only been worried about it when it was too late that may still be the case here. again, it's such a new, g

jeffrey hinton recently left his job at google to issue a stark warning. >> i think it's possible thatution of intelligence. >> reporter: people are passing phase, in other words, computers will take over >> yes, that's possible. >> reporter: an existential threat to all of us. listen to where that warning is coming from. these interest guys who invented this technology and growing bipartisan agreement in congress that a.i. needs to be regulated, but the u.s. is far behind europe where new a.i. guardrail laws are moving towards passage, riskier apps would be facing oversight in europe, laws would move to protect children, ban scoring people based on their behavior and remote facial recognition using that in stores, for example. this is really a grave new world, you guys. >> it really is and a scary one too in ways. jake, everyone is remarking, oh, here the industry itself is saying please, regulate us regulate us, but a number of scientists and including now the former god father of a.i., have said, well, let's just pause for a moment let's hit the brakes for a moment and not develop i

surge of interest in the problem of yes control over artificial intelligence, and elon musk, jeffrey hinton, drew attention to the fact that enough is enough, even those language models that are now being created, they are already becoming too strong and have a very strong impact on society if creativity is not an integral part of freedom will, but free will. we say that this is an accident or, in general, this is an opportunity to act. well, in general, there are no chaotic ones, that 's just the point, artificial intelligence is not predetermined to act at all. maybe, to act is not predetermined that it has never been incorporated into any program , you can put a random number generator and issue an answer depending on the model by which this generator is used. what, while we define creativity as a non- algorithmic decision. this is fundamentally, not a function attributed to artificial intelligence, it is in any case algorithmic no matter how difficult it was from this random number generator. it's still algorithmic. yes, he acts, according to that. uh, that set of rules he was laid eith