34
34
Nov 12, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 34
favorite 0
quote 0
eastern, law professor talking about his book about epidemics and the law. watch book tv this weekend on c-span2. >> sunday night on cue and a, university at texas austin professor sarah bray talks about big data and law enforcement. >> the police have long collected their own data on information but that is on people to have contact with. what's happening now in the digital age is police are increasingly collecting information on folks who have no direct criminal justice contact. part of that has to do with this variety component of the three v's of big data. they use tools like automatic license plate -- readers where you don't have to be pulled over for them to put
eastern, law professor talking about his book about epidemics and the law. watch book tv this weekend on c-span2. >> sunday night on cue and a, university at texas austin professor sarah bray talks about big data and law enforcement. >> the police have long collected their own data on information but that is on people to have contact with. what's happening now in the digital age is police are increasingly collecting information on folks who have no direct criminal justice contact....
26
26
Nov 8, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 26
favorite 0
quote 0
at hanford law. leadingone of the authorities on supreme court practice and he has argued over three dozen cases in that court. he was the winning advocate in crawford v. washington. involving the hearsay exception in criminal prosecutions. in riley against california on smartphone privacy protection rights. and he was one of the plaintiffs counsel in obergefell versus hudson. jeff is a graduate of duke and michigan law and he clerked for the late stephen reinhardt on the court of appeals and for justice stevens. to his left is kathleen hartman. a partner in law 4 -- she has a private practice representing clayton and that plaintiffs and defendants and high-stakes litigation. during the obama administration -- and theas deputy department of justice. she is a graduate of harvard college and law school and andked for merrick garland as you may have guessed also for justice stevens. finally on the far left of the panel which is not a phrase he will hear very often is daniel breasts -- brass. who is nomi
at hanford law. leadingone of the authorities on supreme court practice and he has argued over three dozen cases in that court. he was the winning advocate in crawford v. washington. involving the hearsay exception in criminal prosecutions. in riley against california on smartphone privacy protection rights. and he was one of the plaintiffs counsel in obergefell versus hudson. jeff is a graduate of duke and michigan law and he clerked for the late stephen reinhardt on the court of appeals and...
31
31
Nov 17, 2020
11/20
by
BBCNEWS
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
so you cannot defend the rule of law by infringing the rule of law.pean parliament, let me also add that it is a political body which had a resolution which itself infringed their own procedural rules, because abstentions were not ta ken into account. hungary challenged its decision. the court case is still pending. in a normal, ordinary rule of law, we should wait for the result. we should wait for thejudgement that is still to come, maybe early next year. so i see only that institutions are not actually abiding to the rule of law, which should also refer to them. yet you... all in all, this historic package should be launched as soon as possible, and the money should be given to those who are most in need. and moral responsibility lies with those who are actually pressuring ideological blackmailing in the name of this valuable and really precious principle of rule of law. minister, you're putting an awful lot of information out there, some of which, for some people watching this around the world, will be a little complex to take in. but the november
so you cannot defend the rule of law by infringing the rule of law.pean parliament, let me also add that it is a political body which had a resolution which itself infringed their own procedural rules, because abstentions were not ta ken into account. hungary challenged its decision. the court case is still pending. in a normal, ordinary rule of law, we should wait for the result. we should wait for thejudgement that is still to come, maybe early next year. so i see only that institutions are...
46
46
Nov 23, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 46
favorite 0
quote 0
it is not just one law or a handful of laws, it is hundreds of laws that are amended and strengthened over time. >> can you speak about the laws that codified slavery here in virginia or anywhere? >> before we talk about the laws, there are a couple of cases that set precedent. involves 1640 and it three men in servitude. one wasn't african man by the name of john punch, the other two were men of european descent, victor, a dutchman, and james gregory a scotsman. they were all in servitude, they ran from virginia to maryland, were caught and returned to virginia so they all committed the same crime. they were runaways, all costs together, did the same thing. you begin to see racial differences in treatment here with this case where victor and james gregory were made to serve their original owner one additional year in the colony of virginia for three years, john koch was made to serve his owners enters -- and his owners assigned wherever they live for the rest of his life. >> and he was black. >> he was black, he is referenced as african in this record. you have another case that turn
it is not just one law or a handful of laws, it is hundreds of laws that are amended and strengthened over time. >> can you speak about the laws that codified slavery here in virginia or anywhere? >> before we talk about the laws, there are a couple of cases that set precedent. involves 1640 and it three men in servitude. one wasn't african man by the name of john punch, the other two were men of european descent, victor, a dutchman, and james gregory a scotsman. they were all in...
479
479
Nov 6, 2020
11/20
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 479
favorite 0
quote 0
they are just ignoring the law. they are defying the law. there is a reason they are doing that. there is a reason they are defying the law. the reason you don't want observers there is because you are doing something you don't want to be observed. i am angry and i think the american people are angry because by throwing the observers out and clouding the vote counting in a shroud of darkness and setting the stage to potentially steal election not just from the president, but from over 60 million people across this country come all across this country. it is lawless and they need to follow the law. >> sean: it really is that simple. how are americans ever to have, and whichever way the election comes out, i'm for free open elections. we are the home of microsoft, silicon valley, and microsoft. do you think that we could come up with a better system than this system with last-minute millions of ballots being sent out and no observers of the count when the law requires it? tell me legally, how does this play out? is that the state legislatures?
they are just ignoring the law. they are defying the law. there is a reason they are doing that. there is a reason they are defying the law. the reason you don't want observers there is because you are doing something you don't want to be observed. i am angry and i think the american people are angry because by throwing the observers out and clouding the vote counting in a shroud of darkness and setting the stage to potentially steal election not just from the president, but from over 60...
21
21
tv
eye 21
favorite 0
quote 0
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. what i said there is, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education, publish it in promotion. you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in their national security organs of the central police government does it. it was sent to people's government. that's what they are looking for. education is it, you don't know that again, you aren't, you, and you have no, no factual basis for making those sort of statements you are simply making are sweeping allegations based on your own assumptions and bias when there's no assumptions and bias. when you look at how the national security organs of the central people's government operate when they're in on the mainland, and we're not talking about mainland, we're talking about one country 2 systems. let's come back to hong kong. it doesn't look as
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. what i said there is, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education, publish it in promotion. you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in their national security organs of the central police government does it. it was sent to people's...
31
31
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
nathan law. is there no way for the pro-democracy movement to negotiate now with the hong kong government or has that door closed for good? i think if we look at asco, elating aggressive behavior from the central government, that is qualification of the legislators are sweeping national, national security law and order rest as they have made. there are no cites of them reeling to concede any grounds. they have been doing a lot of brutal suppression in hong kong. so i don't think there is a room for the gauche ation. rather there's actually room for the international committee to act, to really hot china accountable. what's actually left for the pro-democracy movement on the ground, symbolic protests, lack of cooperation, civil disobedience. what form is the protest going to take? now now that china has narrowed your scope for movement. social movement is in the form of a pendulum, or we have our highest point last year, where going rather to a low point. now, i think for us, for hong kong, people
nathan law. is there no way for the pro-democracy movement to negotiate now with the hong kong government or has that door closed for good? i think if we look at asco, elating aggressive behavior from the central government, that is qualification of the legislators are sweeping national, national security law and order rest as they have made. there are no cites of them reeling to concede any grounds. they have been doing a lot of brutal suppression in hong kong. so i don't think there is a room...
23
23
Nov 13, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 23
favorite 0
quote 0
of the power to create laws on the execution of those laws could be vested according to the first words of article two, and that a praise the didn't of the unit -- president of the united states and not multiple president and congress shouldn't be able to control that on the constraints to remove. i will say one more thing about the previous discussion of the president's responsibility to obey criminal laws. i don't agree that if anybody makes the argument that if the president is failing faithfully to execute the laws, that he is a criminal, because people argue all the time that the president should enforce this law in a certain way or should enforce this law. it has to be more complicated than that. i did write an opinion or testimony and when a president violates the criminal statute, he could be indicted while in office. i know there has been an opinion that says he cannot. i went through the constitution and i could not find a constraint on the authority to indict a president, if there was a clear violation of a generally applicable law. not something congress comes up with becaus
of the power to create laws on the execution of those laws could be vested according to the first words of article two, and that a praise the didn't of the unit -- president of the united states and not multiple president and congress shouldn't be able to control that on the constraints to remove. i will say one more thing about the previous discussion of the president's responsibility to obey criminal laws. i don't agree that if anybody makes the argument that if the president is failing...
27
27
Nov 11, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
-- else had a lawful choice? mr. hawkins: the poor and people of indian tribes, at any point they brought an as applied challenge, they would have been a talented -- entitled to prevail. from day one congress has been ordering them to do something which is beyond congress's commerce power. justice kagan: isn't that backwards to say those people who never had to pay a cent were subject to a command when people who did have to pay, who felt the coercive power of government were not subject to a command? mr. hawkins: that is part 3a of the chief justice's opinion indicating the mandate is best read as a command. to some people, many people, the construction was available at the time. in 2017, congress effectively eok these subsection exemptions and expanded them to everyone. there is no tax savings construction available and we are just left with a command. >> justice gorsuch. justice gorsuch: i would like to pick up on the merits. mr. hawkins, good morning. as i understand mr. verrilli, his argument on the merits is it
-- else had a lawful choice? mr. hawkins: the poor and people of indian tribes, at any point they brought an as applied challenge, they would have been a talented -- entitled to prevail. from day one congress has been ordering them to do something which is beyond congress's commerce power. justice kagan: isn't that backwards to say those people who never had to pay a cent were subject to a command when people who did have to pay, who felt the coercive power of government were not subject to a...
15
15
tv
eye 15
favorite 0
quote 0
richard the good go from the law and justice party. and the polish government afford to be at odds with the e.u. and its core about race. are the good go welcome to conflict zone. good morning, very good morning to you. my pleasure being here. the e.u. is said to be more than just a single market, but a union of values including rule of law, freedom of democracy, a respect for human rights. poland signed up to those values when it voted to join the bloc, back in 2004. but now you're willing to veto the budget over an accountability, mechanism. so you sign up to the values when you join the e.u., but you don't want to be accountable for breaching them. oh, well, that's exactly like you, sad. first of all, the church is a legitimate instrument in the european law. lito has been used nor has it. he threatens to be used when it comes before. there is nothing extraordinary in the fact that this of that government is not very happy with the solution that is, but i think that your e.u. partners would, would beg to differ on that mr. the good
richard the good go from the law and justice party. and the polish government afford to be at odds with the e.u. and its core about race. are the good go welcome to conflict zone. good morning, very good morning to you. my pleasure being here. the e.u. is said to be more than just a single market, but a union of values including rule of law, freedom of democracy, a respect for human rights. poland signed up to those values when it voted to join the bloc, back in 2004. but now you're willing to...
27
27
tv
eye 27
favorite 0
quote 0
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. when i said this, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education publicized here and promotion . you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they brit, that's what they do when they bring in the national security organs of the central police. government is a central people's government. that's what they are looking for. education is it, you don't know that again, you aren't, you, and you have no, no factual basis for making those sort of statements you are simply making are sweeping allegations based on your own assumptions and bias when there's no assumptions and bias. when you look at how the national security organs of the central people's government operate when they're in on the mainland, and we're not talking about mainland, we're talking about one country 2 systems. let's come back to hong kong. it doesn't look as though it's
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. when i said this, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education publicized here and promotion . you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they brit, that's what they do when they bring in the national security organs of the central police. government is a central people's government....
43
43
Nov 6, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 43
favorite 0
quote 0
that is how i understand the law. we will follow the law. that is all we have asked for all along, whether it comes to how we vote, we just want everyone to follow the law. that is my understanding of the law. others may have different opinions of it. at the end of the day, let the process unfold and we will all follow the law. we are governed by law. we don't choose. we will follow the law. >> i'm sorry. one second. i want to make sure i understood what you said. certified bys in, the department of state, then the governor, correct? >> correct. >> what role does the legislature get to play in this? >> under normal circumstances, none. >> under any circumstance? >> you are going down a rabbit hole we don't need to go down. we are trying to get the vote tabulated and get a winner. party submits electors to the governor. the secretary of state will certify the winter. each party can challenge that. challenges will go through the court process. once that process ends, then certification stands, reversed, then the governor appoints those elector
that is how i understand the law. we will follow the law. that is all we have asked for all along, whether it comes to how we vote, we just want everyone to follow the law. that is my understanding of the law. others may have different opinions of it. at the end of the day, let the process unfold and we will all follow the law. we are governed by law. we don't choose. we will follow the law. >> i'm sorry. one second. i want to make sure i understood what you said. certified bys in, the...
68
68
Nov 25, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 68
favorite 0
quote 0
, federal critical law ethics, compliance and a whole lot more. my experience with sean has demonstrated that is not only in exceptional talented lawyer but someone deeply committed to the rule of law. he will be prepared to hit the day ground running on day one as a commissioner and i have complete confidence that he will faithfully apply the law fairly and neutrally. i will also note that sean and his wife ellen are expecting a baby this winter and so these are propitious times in the cooksey household and i'm proud to introduce my friend sean. >> thank you, senator cruz, three nominees, two babies on the way into her the families. earlier this year our committee gathered to confirm a nominee to restore a quorum at the fec, since that confirmation of tray trainer the fec lost a quorum with the resignation of commissioner hunter in july of this year, the confirmation of these three nominees before the committee today will restore a quorum at the fec but more importantly the confirmation of these three nominees would restore a full slate of commis
, federal critical law ethics, compliance and a whole lot more. my experience with sean has demonstrated that is not only in exceptional talented lawyer but someone deeply committed to the rule of law. he will be prepared to hit the day ground running on day one as a commissioner and i have complete confidence that he will faithfully apply the law fairly and neutrally. i will also note that sean and his wife ellen are expecting a baby this winter and so these are propitious times in the cooksey...
25
25
Nov 4, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 25
favorite 0
quote 0
that is according to state law. and we follow state law. part of democracy is following the laws that have been prescribed by our elected lawmakers. and the elected lawmakers have prescribed the process for canvassing in our jurisdiction. i am incredibly proud of the work done by wisconsin's election officials. i feel 100% confident in the elections that they conducted. and that the laws that are established by elected lawmakers were followed in yesterday's election. calling election at the state level. that is called certification. and certification is a very meticulous, careful process that commences with the certification as a state first. up until that point, there is no statewide aggregate, there is no conceited election. any of those protections you are by the are predictions media and other groups, based on unofficial results. for many of us, we talked about the mechanics of how the process works. tois really important continue working hard to understand exactly how the process works and bring those mechanicals back to wisconsin vote
that is according to state law. and we follow state law. part of democracy is following the laws that have been prescribed by our elected lawmakers. and the elected lawmakers have prescribed the process for canvassing in our jurisdiction. i am incredibly proud of the work done by wisconsin's election officials. i feel 100% confident in the elections that they conducted. and that the laws that are established by elected lawmakers were followed in yesterday's election. calling election at the...
11
11
Nov 8, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 11
favorite 0
quote 0
law we still don't have a single national privacy la law, federal law and the friday of state laws.so i would hope that we get is a federal and national privacy law and it's important to understand there is the difference between those two with a uniform law that applies it doesn't matter where the different parts of the transaction we do need a federal privacy law to set the standard with the ability of the state ag and it would be ironic if we ended up with the law that actually created more patchwork because one of the reasons with a single european market so we should take a lesson from that because of so many areas have a national marketplace. >> do you think it's possible we could get a federal law? >> we could depending on the election results what they are. >> and to be associated with a central investment and with those health records and if with the federal regulation the 2000 bushe on versus gore supreme court case, which decided that presidential election. >> it was considered a once in a generation case. from the beginning, there were five members of the court who took
law we still don't have a single national privacy la law, federal law and the friday of state laws.so i would hope that we get is a federal and national privacy law and it's important to understand there is the difference between those two with a uniform law that applies it doesn't matter where the different parts of the transaction we do need a federal privacy law to set the standard with the ability of the state ag and it would be ironic if we ended up with the law that actually created more...
44
44
Nov 15, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 44
favorite 0
quote 0
part of it is about law enforcement. that is what i am going to focus on. ,yu, in his book essay they wrote, he can "president trump ultimately order the end of any investigation, even one into his own white house." practices in the white house do not comport with these widely held views of the unitary executive. i will give you six examples. first, volume two of the mueller --ort, the most shocking of revelation of which is the president tried to get his andrdinates to fire mueller utterly failed because those subordinates would not carry out those wishes. not, not know why they did but it probably had to do with some combination of law, the interference -- noninterference in the white house. it is a remarkable episode. i will give five examples that involve attorney general barr, who is obviously a proponent of a broad conception of the unitary executive. at his confirmation hearings, he acknowledged a presidential pardon to prevent testimony for criminal obstruction of justice. in his famous obstruction of justice mam
part of it is about law enforcement. that is what i am going to focus on. ,yu, in his book essay they wrote, he can "president trump ultimately order the end of any investigation, even one into his own white house." practices in the white house do not comport with these widely held views of the unitary executive. i will give you six examples. first, volume two of the mueller --ort, the most shocking of revelation of which is the president tried to get his andrdinates to fire mueller...
21
21
tv
eye 21
favorite 0
quote 0
do you no, no, no, it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. when i said this, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education, publicized here and promotion. you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in the national security organs of the central police. government is a central people's government. that's what they are looking for. education is it, you don't know that again, you aren't, you, and you have no, no factual basis for making those sort of statements you are simply making are sweeping allegations based on your own assumptions and bias when there's no assumptions and bias. when you look at how the national security organs of the central people's government operate when they're in on the mainland. i mean, we're not talking about mainland, we're talking about one country 2 systems. let's come back to hong kong. it doesn't look as though
do you no, no, no, it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. when i said this, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education, publicized here and promotion. you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in the national security organs of the central police. government is a central...
80
80
Nov 7, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 80
favorite 0
quote 0
>> famous harvard law professor.ne of the rest no and highly regarded liberal law professors of his era. he had very good arguments. the good thing was he was so smart. there were certain amount of -- he was a fairly liberal law professor and it was not necessarily going to have a lot of sway with the conservative and in many cases he -- run into a real the supreme court does not allow video of its proceedings. but we have a clip. ted olson and lawrence drive, about a minute long, making their arguments. bush versus palm beach county canvassing authority. let's listen and have you talk about the arguments they made. -- laurence tribe. the novemberafter presidential election the florida supreme court overturned and materially rewrote portions of the carefully formulated set of laws enacted by florida's legislature to govern the conduct of that election. of who determination prevailed on november 7. part of ourit is culture to talk about how unfair it is to change the rules of the game, i think this is the point when t
>> famous harvard law professor.ne of the rest no and highly regarded liberal law professors of his era. he had very good arguments. the good thing was he was so smart. there were certain amount of -- he was a fairly liberal law professor and it was not necessarily going to have a lot of sway with the conservative and in many cases he -- run into a real the supreme court does not allow video of its proceedings. but we have a clip. ted olson and lawrence drive, about a minute long, making...
32
32
Nov 30, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 32
favorite 0
quote 0
it's as simple as that we can pass the laws we can pass the laws is dependent on the executive to impose those in the judiciary to interpret those they fall to the executive they can do anything unless appropriated. nothing. >> the judiciary has blossomed into something much more influential because of so many disputes brought because they're asked to resolve many more legal questions than anticipated and de toueville ticed that entering the united state and his grandiose as compared to what it was at theime , wasn't drawn in influence or importance preiently to the other branches. the whol government is much greater not jt in size but in terms of what it takes in the framers could have possibly anticipated. on natnal federal government that is a state and local funcon is unimaginable and some of those encrchments are perfectly legitimate and others are probably based but that is what we have. >> the state of north carolina why should they know about this? >> nothing really changed to the south carolina case decided 19 oh five and in 1835 i say nothing change but it was understood and en
it's as simple as that we can pass the laws we can pass the laws is dependent on the executive to impose those in the judiciary to interpret those they fall to the executive they can do anything unless appropriated. nothing. >> the judiciary has blossomed into something much more influential because of so many disputes brought because they're asked to resolve many more legal questions than anticipated and de toueville ticed that entering the united state and his grandiose as compared to...
12
12
tv
eye 12
favorite 0
quote 0
richard the good go from the law and justice party. can the polish government afford to be at odds with the e.u. and its core about race? are the good go welcome to conflict zone it morning. very good morning to you. my pleasure being here. the e.u. is said to be more than just a single market, but a union of values including rule of law, freedom of democracy, respect for human rights. poland signed up to those values when it voted to join the bloc, back in 2004. but now you're willing to veto the budget over an accountability, mechanism. so you signed up to the values when you joined the e.u., but you don't want to be accountable for breaching the oh, well, that's exactly like you, sad. first of all, veto is a legitimate instrument in the european law. lito has been used nor has it. he threatens a view just many times before. there is nothing extraordinary in the fact that this of that government is not very happy with the solution of this. but i think that your e.u. partners would, would beg to differ on that mr. the good go. and i j
richard the good go from the law and justice party. can the polish government afford to be at odds with the e.u. and its core about race? are the good go welcome to conflict zone it morning. very good morning to you. my pleasure being here. the e.u. is said to be more than just a single market, but a union of values including rule of law, freedom of democracy, respect for human rights. poland signed up to those values when it voted to join the bloc, back in 2004. but now you're willing to veto...
62
62
Nov 17, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 62
favorite 0
quote 0
you are violating state law.secondarily, this is another potentl case i know may come up, it's somebody moves from one stateith a cast a vote for for sin into another state to tryo cast another vote for the same body that would be seated, that would potentially violent trendy constitution because you can get two dferent sets of votes to seat body that would be seated in january. there will potentially be issue along that front as well. our gl is to the cleaners and fairest election we can't and give people the undstanding of faith that the outcome is actually the ocome, that the winner is the winner in the person who came in second pce came in second pce. to get head at some of the other questions this and audit were doing is for the stateo move certification. under our state law the second-place finisher if they are within .5 or lower percent of the vote of the first-place finisher, may ask for a recount. that recount would follow our state election board rules and essentially we've already procured a a high-spe
you are violating state law.secondarily, this is another potentl case i know may come up, it's somebody moves from one stateith a cast a vote for for sin into another state to tryo cast another vote for the same body that would be seated, that would potentially violent trendy constitution because you can get two dferent sets of votes to seat body that would be seated in january. there will potentially be issue along that front as well. our gl is to the cleaners and fairest election we can't and...
31
31
Nov 21, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 31
favorite 0
quote 0
for following the law and not violating the law like their counties? if i were in the county, i would look at the law and the law said, you you can't cure a ballot. in the secretary says, it is ok to cure a ballot. as a good lawyer, i say to my client, the secretary doesn't mean anything. she can't very the law. it isn't some technical law like, is it three days or four days, it is can you fix the ballot? and it is invalid. that is the substance of the law. and i would tell my client, don't do it. goingt know what you're to accomplish by suing those two counties. they didn't do anything wrong. the counties that did something wrong are the counties that buried the law to make it easier to accumulate enormous numbers of illegal votes. they say we don't know how people voted. they do know that in philadelphia, the vote was for biden. it is ridiculous to say we don't know what would happen. it was equal over the entire state, what were they doing all over the state? the reality is this was a deliberate plan to do this. and to say that we didn't allege thes
for following the law and not violating the law like their counties? if i were in the county, i would look at the law and the law said, you you can't cure a ballot. in the secretary says, it is ok to cure a ballot. as a good lawyer, i say to my client, the secretary doesn't mean anything. she can't very the law. it isn't some technical law like, is it three days or four days, it is can you fix the ballot? and it is invalid. that is the substance of the law. and i would tell my client, don't do...
15
15
Nov 9, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 15
favorite 0
quote 0
david: famous law professor, one of the best known and highly regarded sort of liberal law professorsf his era, had written great constitutional law textbooks. i remember him early on as an advocate in the supreme court. he had some very good arguments and some not so good arguments. the good thing about larry trot was that he was really so smart and so learned on constitutional law that there were certain amount of cases where the justices would sit back and listen to him, which they don't do too often. he was a liberal professor. and he was not going to have a lot of sway with the conservative justices. and so he was in many cases he had run into a real clash with rehnquist and scalia and the conservative members of the court. susan: the court as i hope most c-span listeners and viewers know does not allow video of its proceedings. but even at the time they were audiotaping their oral arguments. and we have a clip of both ted olson and lawrence trot making their arguments before the 2000 rehnquist court on bush vs. palm beach county canvasing authority. let's listen and have you tal
david: famous law professor, one of the best known and highly regarded sort of liberal law professorsf his era, had written great constitutional law textbooks. i remember him early on as an advocate in the supreme court. he had some very good arguments and some not so good arguments. the good thing about larry trot was that he was really so smart and so learned on constitutional law that there were certain amount of cases where the justices would sit back and listen to him, which they don't do...
61
61
Nov 29, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 61
favorite 0
quote 0
i was in law school. that was my introduction to antitrust law so it's been a ng time, it is a big deal that turn that corner and it's only the beginning. only the beginning of what we will see coming against google d we also have fpc expected to do facebook in the next monthr two. state attorneys general will b adding to the google case with their investigations and other aspects and anticompetive behavior so it is a huge deal. >> so w did it take 20 years? google has been a huge success for company f a long time and facebook and doors but how do youxplain monopolies are such a problem in the economy, why would we go 20 years without a case against a big company? ... >>. >> but that aspect it has a lower priority because the court arraigned it in. so that is the whole triumph of neoliberalism in the courts. the other thing is with google and the big tech companie companies, operating under the consumer welfare standard of the idea that the corporations become bigger and they become more efficient that wa
i was in law school. that was my introduction to antitrust law so it's been a ng time, it is a big deal that turn that corner and it's only the beginning. only the beginning of what we will see coming against google d we also have fpc expected to do facebook in the next monthr two. state attorneys general will b adding to the google case with their investigations and other aspects and anticompetive behavior so it is a huge deal. >> so w did it take 20 years? google has been a huge success...
65
65
Nov 6, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 65
favorite 0
quote 0
it is against the law in every state. you have to demonstrate, generally, for voting, that the person is impersonating a legitimate voter. so, again, an individual is not likely to commit that crime for the opportunity of voting in one election, knowing it will not actually change the outcome. for i would just ask you all to relax and let the process unfold . hopefully, we will get results, but we are not there as of yet. this was the most passionate election in my lifetime. the voter turnout proves that. we could have had one or two results we were hoping for. ort president trump wins, vice president biden, but what we did not want was a disputed election. unfortunately, the actions of the department of state have brought that into question. they spent the last few months doing everything they can to ensure the security of the process. i have no knowledge of any voter fraud. i have no knowledge of any deed other than the process. wins -- no matter who wins, you will have a population without faith in the result. that is
it is against the law in every state. you have to demonstrate, generally, for voting, that the person is impersonating a legitimate voter. so, again, an individual is not likely to commit that crime for the opportunity of voting in one election, knowing it will not actually change the outcome. for i would just ask you all to relax and let the process unfold . hopefully, we will get results, but we are not there as of yet. this was the most passionate election in my lifetime. the voter turnout...
23
23
tv
eye 23
favorite 0
quote 0
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. what i said there is, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education publicized here and promotion . you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in their national security organs of the central police government does it. it was sent to people's government. that's what they are looking for. education is it, you don't know that again, you aren't, you and you have no, no factual basis for making those sort of statements you are simply making are sweeping allegations based on your own assumptions and bias. but there's no assumptions and bias when you look at how the national security organs of the central people's government operate when they're in on the mainland. we're not talking about mainland, we're talking about one country 2 systems. let's come back to hong kong. it doesn't look as
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. what i said there is, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education publicized here and promotion . you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in their national security organs of the central police government does it. it was sent to...
100
100
Nov 6, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 100
favorite 0
quote 0
law and choose it and not follow the law. our law passed by the general assembly in a bipartisan fashion and signed by governor wolf says election day ends 8 p.m.. if your ballot is not here by 8 p.m. on tuesday other than a military overseas alec, if it's not here by eight p.m. on tuesday, it does not count. and if there is a defect, there's no remedy for the defect . for the secretary of state to send out guidance to allow defect, to rectify that that is not consistent with the statute and not consistent with the supreme court decision as was authored by act fair, that there is no remedy. legal ballots will count and that is very important. every legal ballot -- >> next up, we have nicholas. do you want to unmute? >> thank you so much. appreciate you taking questions. right now, i was wondering if you know how many counties in pennsylvania did not implement rejectedance for the mail-in ballots to allow people to vote by provisional ballot instead and how many counties did implement that. then based on those numbers, do you
law and choose it and not follow the law. our law passed by the general assembly in a bipartisan fashion and signed by governor wolf says election day ends 8 p.m.. if your ballot is not here by 8 p.m. on tuesday other than a military overseas alec, if it's not here by eight p.m. on tuesday, it does not count. and if there is a defect, there's no remedy for the defect . for the secretary of state to send out guidance to allow defect, to rectify that that is not consistent with the statute and...
17
17
tv
eye 17
favorite 0
quote 0
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. when i said this, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education publicized here and promotion . you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in their national security organs of the central police government does it, it was central people's government. that's what they are looking for.
it's in the basic law. they must obey hong kong law. when i said this, it is not clear yet what any new national security agency would be responsible for . it could simply be responsible for public education publicized here and promotion . you know, you cannot come to the conclusion that they are, they will be enforcing hong kong law. that's what they bring. that's what they do when they bring in their national security organs of the central police government does it, it was central people's...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
88
88
Nov 7, 2020
11/20
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 88
favorite 0
quote 0
we would violate state law. want to clarify or the ministerial state law the detached a.d.u.s would have to be within the buildable area and would have to meet the code requirements. >> commissioner: i'm not concerned about the ministerial ones but extremely concerned about the streamlined ones because the state law seems like it didn't allow for -- it didn't distinguish between the areas like in san francisco and larger lots that exist in the state and the 1200 square foot size could eliminate our back yards or our neighbor's back yards which is an area of extreme concern to me with regard to open space and it strikes me if the city is going to consider lobbying the state at all about changes, that is one that we might want to take into account because of the extraordinary impact it has in dense urban areas. just a point for your consideration. you do have a question for the city attorney which is a number of the points that were raised by my fellow commissioners were all excellent points but what happens if we
we would violate state law. want to clarify or the ministerial state law the detached a.d.u.s would have to be within the buildable area and would have to meet the code requirements. >> commissioner: i'm not concerned about the ministerial ones but extremely concerned about the streamlined ones because the state law seems like it didn't allow for -- it didn't distinguish between the areas like in san francisco and larger lots that exist in the state and the 1200 square foot size could...
66
66
Nov 19, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 66
favorite 0
quote 0
and judicial nominations, election law, federal criminal law, ethics comiance and a whole lot more. my experience with sean is devastated to m he's not only an exceptionally talented lawyer but also someone deeply committed to the rulef law a he will be prepared to hit today or ground runningn day one as commissioner and i hav complete confidence that he will faithfully apply the law fairly and neutrally. i would also note that sean and his wife ellen are expecting a baby this winter. and so these are propitious times in the cksey household. i'm proud to introduce a friend, sean. >> thank you, senator cruz. three nominees, two babies on thes, way into of these familie. earlier this year our committee gathered to confirm the nomineeq to restore a quorum at the ftc and sends that confirmation of commissioner, they once again lost a quorum with the resignation of commissioner hunter in july of this year and the confirmation of these three nominees before the committee today will restore a quorum at the ftc but more important leave the confirmation that these three nominees would restor
and judicial nominations, election law, federal criminal law, ethics comiance and a whole lot more. my experience with sean is devastated to m he's not only an exceptionally talented lawyer but also someone deeply committed to the rulef law a he will be prepared to hit today or ground runningn day one as commissioner and i hav complete confidence that he will faithfully apply the law fairly and neutrally. i would also note that sean and his wife ellen are expecting a baby this winter. and so...
255
255
Nov 7, 2020
11/20
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 255
favorite 0
quote 0
he wanted jim jordan, matt gaetz, when you have laws, i'lle has the same law.artisan observers are permitted to watch the whole process start to finish. it that's a violation of law, how do you remedy that? >> just like the speaker said on this very show. you can't let those count. you need to get in and figure out which both they are. the good news is today, the speaker of the house and the president here in the state of pennsylvania -- >> sean: if you weren't allowed to watch it being open? you don't know what they did. >> that's the point. it that's the point. at those votes can't count. the speaker said that last night, and he's exactly right. >> sean: of real quickly, matt question mike >> a full audit is necessary, an injunction if necessary. i will fight on the floor of the house of representatives to stop the electoral college may be certified. we only need one senator to joined to make sure. >> sean: america needs a system where they can have honest, free, fair elections. we've been doing this 33 years, i've been on all sides of this, but they can have
he wanted jim jordan, matt gaetz, when you have laws, i'lle has the same law.artisan observers are permitted to watch the whole process start to finish. it that's a violation of law, how do you remedy that? >> just like the speaker said on this very show. you can't let those count. you need to get in and figure out which both they are. the good news is today, the speaker of the house and the president here in the state of pennsylvania -- >> sean: if you weren't allowed to watch it...
184
184
Nov 10, 2020
11/20
by
FOXNEWSW
tv
eye 184
favorite 0
quote 0
this does the law really matter? some people were just taking it into their own hands. is it okay for them to rewrite the laws so we can't watch? >> is it okay to ignore the signature requirement? democrats don't care about that. they don't care how he lost his lungs he lost. they aren't asked many question in the media. when are you going to ask a question about the election? when are you going to take seriously the idea that every vote counts. i've had it with them, let's fight back. let's call out cheating when we find a. looks count every vote and go t social media and stop them from censoring our content. when the major networks to polling asked them how they do it mitch and i need to come up with something for these mail-i ballots. if we don't do something about this we are going to lose the ability to elect officials. by the weight also this week an the former independent counsel raised additional concerns constitutional concerns about the election. i sat there and watched this entire conversation and he calle
this does the law really matter? some people were just taking it into their own hands. is it okay for them to rewrite the laws so we can't watch? >> is it okay to ignore the signature requirement? democrats don't care about that. they don't care how he lost his lungs he lost. they aren't asked many question in the media. when are you going to ask a question about the election? when are you going to take seriously the idea that every vote counts. i've had it with them, let's fight back....
71
71
Nov 29, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN2
tv
eye 71
favorite 0
quote 0
the law of the length o the supreme law of the land.lternative is a law that is forever in ctain rated no more stable, no more reliable tha popular opinion of the time. and opinions change. the words don't. anthony: succumbing alchemy you sa, between 1803 and 1905, there's not much difference . looking at the constitution. even though there are big changes in the way the wor works. if you look in the early 18 hureds, in the role of the executives, george washington for example is very different presidenthan say teddy roosevelt that com in the 19 hundreds, very dferent from what we see today. you come down onhe side of the evangelism. explain why tt is the way we should be looking at this document. it. douglas: i think justice kavanaugh captured it. there are times when the constitution has to be updated. i had 27 amendments per unit the 31 time square pass in the 31 couple years after it was ratified in the 3111 years they were added. the other 17 of them long in the last 140 years or so. very important matters arise sometimes, and nurs
the law of the length o the supreme law of the land.lternative is a law that is forever in ctain rated no more stable, no more reliable tha popular opinion of the time. and opinions change. the words don't. anthony: succumbing alchemy you sa, between 1803 and 1905, there's not much difference . looking at the constitution. even though there are big changes in the way the wor works. if you look in the early 18 hureds, in the role of the executives, george washington for example is very different...
39
39
Nov 5, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN
tv
eye 39
favorite 0
quote 0
. >> election law is complex. it's our job to not just understand and implement the law with precision, but it's also our job to explain the nuances of election to the public at a way that's approachable. as administrators, we can't change the law, the process. that can only be done by your elected lawmakers. as election administrators, we are the referees. we have to follow the rules prescribed by those you elect and we have an obligation to show you how we are doing that. so to that end, i wanted to answer questions we've been receiving in our office the last few days and provide you with updates, namely, let's discuss the unofficial turnout numbers, election day registration, and the mechanics of a recount. we have also put out a press release with this information and encourage you to share the facts with others who may have questions or concerns about the election process. so when it comes to voter unofficially, wisconsin voters cast 3,929,374 votes for president. that is the most ever in the state of wiscons
. >> election law is complex. it's our job to not just understand and implement the law with precision, but it's also our job to explain the nuances of election to the public at a way that's approachable. as administrators, we can't change the law, the process. that can only be done by your elected lawmakers. as election administrators, we are the referees. we have to follow the rules prescribed by those you elect and we have an obligation to show you how we are doing that. so to that...
278
278
Nov 6, 2020
11/20
by
MSNBCW
quote
eye 278
favorite 0
quote 2
we have laws. we have state laws that dictate how the process should unfold, how these votes should be counted, and frankly, up until now, the main -- the main cause for uncertainty in this whole
we have laws. we have state laws that dictate how the process should unfold, how these votes should be counted, and frankly, up until now, the main -- the main cause for uncertainty in this whole
39
39
Nov 26, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 39
favorite 0
quote 0
it's not just one law or a handful of laws. it's hundreds of laws that are amended and strengthened overtime. >> can you speak a little bit about the laws that codified slavery here in virginia, or anywhere? >> before we talked about the laws. there are a couple of cases that set a precedent. what is in 16 40, and it involves three men incertitude, one was african mother by the name of john, punch the other european descent, and scotch men. so they were all in servitude. they ran from virginia to maryland, they were cut and return to virginia. so they all committed the same crime though. they were runways. they got caught together. they did the same thing. you begin to see racial differences in treatment with the case. where victor and gregory were -- one additional year and the colony of virginia three years. john was me to serve his owner and his owners besides or ears for the rest of his natural life wherever they lived. >> and john punch was black? >> john punch was black. he's referenced as african in this record. you've a
it's not just one law or a handful of laws. it's hundreds of laws that are amended and strengthened overtime. >> can you speak a little bit about the laws that codified slavery here in virginia, or anywhere? >> before we talked about the laws. there are a couple of cases that set a precedent. what is in 16 40, and it involves three men incertitude, one was african mother by the name of john, punch the other european descent, and scotch men. so they were all in servitude. they ran...
35
35
tv
eye 35
favorite 0
quote 0
they have, however, been tried under the old colonial laws under the hong kong laws by more or less independent hong kong court and not under the draconian new nation national security law. that introduces the arbitrariness of china's legal system into this city. this would have been much worse for them, but here's billing are reporting them and didn't use asia. we'll have more on that story coming up after this show. let's now take, a look at some other stories making headlines around the world. in the u.s., joe biden is pushing ahead with preparations for office despite president on the drums. continuing refusal to concede the election media say biden will nominate anthony blinken as secretary of state when he announces the 1st of his cabinet picks. lincoln served as deputy secretary of state and deputy national security adviser during the obama administration. the foreign ministers of germany, france, and britain have met in berlin to discuss the future of the iran nuclear deal. the 3 countries have spearheaded efforts to keep the 2015 agreement alive after the us president donald trump aban
they have, however, been tried under the old colonial laws under the hong kong laws by more or less independent hong kong court and not under the draconian new nation national security law. that introduces the arbitrariness of china's legal system into this city. this would have been much worse for them, but here's billing are reporting them and didn't use asia. we'll have more on that story coming up after this show. let's now take, a look at some other stories making headlines around the...
12
12
tv
eye 12
favorite 0
quote 0
are about to be enshrined in law . and many critics, even moderate ones, are really concerned how dangerous is this law? first of all, you have to say that this is not a new law. what they're debating and what they're likely to pass is additions to an existing law. that was the infection prevention law that has been, that has existed in germany for decades, but it was too weak to really act and give the government enough power to counteract a pandemic of this massive importance, like a coronavirus pandemic. and what we've seen in the past is that the government has tried to impose restrictions to prevent the population from getting sick and from overwhelming the whole system. but then like you could find it too easy to overturn some of these restrictions, which is why the government is now basically just ensure izing in law, the measures that it has been taking throughout this pandemic for the last 88 months already. anyway, so it's not a new law, it would just give the government more legal footing. but of course, cri
are about to be enshrined in law . and many critics, even moderate ones, are really concerned how dangerous is this law? first of all, you have to say that this is not a new law. what they're debating and what they're likely to pass is additions to an existing law. that was the infection prevention law that has been, that has existed in germany for decades, but it was too weak to really act and give the government enough power to counteract a pandemic of this massive importance, like a...
37
37
Nov 3, 2020
11/20
by
CSPAN3
tv
eye 37
favorite 0
quote 0
and then becomes law. the president may veto a bill passed by the congress, but congress may still buy two thirds majority, make the bill law. although the chief responsibility of congress is making laws, several other responsibilities are delegated to the two houses. in the senate or upper house as it is called, each of the 48 states of the nation is represented by two elected members. making it total membership of 96. small states and large have equal representation in the senate. the senate is too important functions apart from its lawmaking duties. to pass an important presidential appointments, and to approve or reject all treaties with other nations initiated by the president. when a treaty is under consideration, the members of the senate express their opinions. either of approval or disapproval. and then voted is taken. if two thirds of the senate approves of the treaty it is in effect. in the house of representatives or lower house, each of the 48 states is represented in proportion to its populat
and then becomes law. the president may veto a bill passed by the congress, but congress may still buy two thirds majority, make the bill law. although the chief responsibility of congress is making laws, several other responsibilities are delegated to the two houses. in the senate or upper house as it is called, each of the 48 states of the nation is represented by two elected members. making it total membership of 96. small states and large have equal representation in the senate. the senate...