which might or might not succeed. but the net level of existential risk on that path is the sum of these three different technologies. perhaps if we got these technologies in a different order, we could avoid some of these existential risks. say if we face a.i. first, well, we'll still have to hope we get through that critical technology, the existential risks of that. but then if we succeeded in the having safe and beneficial a.i., maybe it could help elinate or reduce the other risks from synthetic biology and nanotech. so now, there are a host of additional considerations we have to take into account before we can make, all things considered, judgments about these macro strategic issues, but it illustrates thinking in terms of the timing might give us more insight into these things than the simple-minded question of whether we should have technology x or not. so we can, generalize just slightly, propose a replacement of the traditional concept of sustainability which is static with the dynamic concept. so tradition

>> you might call it a state. you might call it the palestinian empire. it's going to be an autonomy. it's going to be their militarized, and yes, in order to encourage them, as we don't want to goff enthem. they should be competent to govern themselves. >> rose: your prime ministercuyo state solution. >> yeah. you might say everything, i believe in the palestinian empire. what does it mean. it's going to be an autonomy. >> rose: why can't you call it a state? >> i was ready to recognize our right to-- are they ready to recognize our right to exist as a jewish state, abu mazza and from arafat, not talking about hamas, and this is the core of the conflict. they believe that '67 lines is just a stage. their ambition is not to have a palestinian state. otherwise they would have had it. because annapolis proposal, camp david proposal, oslo pro-- proposal even the u.n. transition proposal, they rejected all of it. because their aim is not to have a palestinian state of '67 lines, but to destruct the jewish state. this is the idea. that's why you don't say even

they said there might be a delay. they might get another from the french at the time. as well as we know, it has not happened. >> why do you even need to worry about this? president obama has said it is unacceptable that the united states not allow them. the president of the united states says he will take care of it. >> we have a common objective. one way or another, this should be stopped. and he claimsaid that no deal is better than a bad deal. and letting deal the sanctions -- >> so israel prefers there would be no deal? >> if there is a deal, we will include any fuel cycle. it might be a good deal. >> a good deal for you is that they have no -- >> no indigenous capability to enrich uranium. >> that is the only thing that would -- >> it is the main issue now. the terror activities generated by iran is not discussed. the main point we should focus on is the cycle. let's see what will happen. >> don't you trust the united states to do it? >> we understand the flavor of the discussions now. it is about the percent they should have. >> if you are discussing only the nu

i might actually be happy if it were more promising. as for whether there are any more reasons for discoveries than for discoveries in the somewhat arbitrarily key insight, deep learning is fairly recent and conditional networks that big data is kind of compassionate recently our boundary away if we camped. and my impression is that progress has probably continued that more or less a constant rate. it's very difficult to mashup because we don't have a good ship it out generally intelligent a.i. czar. but there doesn't seem to be any slacking off in the field in general. there's a lot of enthusiasm, a lot of lake interesting purchase in acquiring companies like the company we have been working with them is just acquired a google for $400 million this last year after it did in competition with facebook, really trying to scoop up talent. so i don't perceive any general kind does since the dissolution meant the dissolution meant for a sense of technician in the field of a.i. maybe stewart can fill in more of that later. yes. >> thanks for t

what the consequences might be if the grand jury convened in the missouri city shooting death of michael brown does not call for an indictment against the officer. it galvanized activists across the nation to see excessive force by police at some point come to an end. we're glad you joined us. that conversation coming up right now. and by contributions to your pbs station by viewers like you. thank you. >>> the grand jury's decision whether or not to indict the officer that shot michael brown is expect in days. if they will choose not to indict the and consequences will have communities on edge. joining us to civil rights attorney and community advocate connie rice, front and center in the nation-wide efforts to bring about police reform certainly in la and beyond. connie, always great to be in conversation with you, although, i wish about something else. >> ditto. >> let me jump right in the time i have. what do you expect is going to happen if this grand jury decides not to indict? >> well, the signals right now and i'm just reading, have no idea, i think that the reason they let the l

we might see further falls. i have seen how people -- another indicator [indiscernible] >> what does that mean for the economies of russia? >> it is very bad news for people i like having bad news. for russia it is bad. with a few exceptions. the oil producers would like to have more revenue pretty >> we put a lot of demand on central banks. >> we expect them to be our saviors. in a situation of deflationary threat, they manage depression, they were the game. many people feared hyperinflation. these policies, but they didn't. they can't fix the underlying weaknesses, the decline in productivity, growth across the west. it is disturbing. they can just buy us time. the big questions is how we trade in a new and better balanced economy. >> i'm intrigued by what i once heard a secretary of the treasury say. the economy is about the politics. if the politics don't work, you can't force the economy to work. but i don't think is quite so close. but it works both ways. politics becomes economics of course. the governmen

they might fight each other and they might cooperate in certain cases. in some way, they are exporting and imposing their way of islam. >> do you believe there is something in islam that motivates them or simply that these are radical jihadist terrorists? as other religious leaders have said, they kidnapped the religion. there is nothing in islam that argues they should be this way. >> yes. i agree with that. this is their interpretation of islam. we cannot ignore the fact that not all muslims are jihadists. but all jihadists are muslims. >> what does that mean? >> this is a clash between civilizations. islam, in the recent history, has declined. you can see poverty exploited by their leaders. lack of relevant ideology like they adopted in the past. today, it seems to be solutions. this is the solution. they know how to approach these frustrated people. and to mobilize him to become isis followers, al qaeda followers. it is a vicious circle. i do not believe that, as a society, we sanctify this. and our deteriorating situation regarding the economy and e

to happen or that might have been connected to this.ation? or can you tell us what you know? >> well, i know that our leader, the leader of the official opposition will be in briefings, the prime minister's certainly been briefed. some of our mps were still in lock down until recently. some of the others were not. what we do know from these two incidents this week and it's very important to stress these. the terrible killing of a soldier by a guy in a shopping mall with a car, this was not a terrorist brought in from overseas. he was a local boy who, born and bred in quebec, who became so-called radicalized, i think became so-called crazy. so we had one incident and then we have what may have been a copycat. another young man, the only thing we know about him is previous conviction for drugs, previous conviction for mugging. does that tell me that this is an international terror gang? the only thing he had in his hand was a shotgun. and thank god all he had was a shotgun and not heavy duty weaponry. are we dealing with an international

you never know when their attack might end, if you fight all the way to trial, you might lose.everyone settles. even those who think they're innocent. unless you're very rich, you can't afford to fight the feds. if they want you, they'll probably get you. and then they may get promoted even if they lie. we invited prosecutors friedrich, caldwell, to reply to the charges laid out in powell's book, but they did not respond. next, life is good for our overlords in washington, d.c.. today most of america's richest counties surround the capital. more excess of our imperial overlords next.@? live. >> upon first entering the home you have this incredibly gracious staircase. >> washington's real estate market is hot. you can really see the crown molding when you get to the top. stossel: there are lots of expensive homes here. >> beautiful gourmet cooking. culinary delight. stossel: all glass ceilings. this home is a steal at $2.8 million. 2.8 million is a steal he says because our real estate market has been relatively recession proof. >> because government is its main industry. we con

strayed all others might write about gay authors. authors might write about universal experiences. the host creates a welcoming environment for everybody. there is no cultural barrier to entry. >> the demographic of people who come will match the demographic of the reader. it is very simple. if we want more people of color, you book more people of color. you want more women, your book more women. kind of like that. it gets mixed up a little bit. in general, we kind of have a core group of people who come every month. their ages and very. we definitely have some folks who are straight. >> the loyal audience has allowed michelle to take more chances with the monthly lineup. established authors bring in an older audience. younker authors bring in their friends from the community who might be bringing in an older author. >> raider has provided a stage for more than 400 writers. it ranges from fiction to academics stories to academic stories this service the underground of queer fell, history, or culture. >> and there are so many differen

the doctor would tell you what you're going to get, might or might not tell you what's really going onwith you, never would go to the options. yes, doctor, whatever you say. we thought it was our job you don't want to worry peoples original heads about what's going on. we rebelled in the '70s, '80s and 90s about that. about the time you and i were trained were taught to be doctor informative article. almost a retail model. you go through all the options, talk about the pros and on and the risks and benefits and make the whole menu of options and then you go, what would you like to do? which one do you want to? invariably you find this, right? basic, well, i don't know. what would you do, doctor? what do we get taught to say? it's not my decision to this is your decision to make. i'm not deciding for me. you have to decide. what is evolving is the recognition and begin to see when i followed the geriatricians and the palliative care doctors. the political counselor at the counselor says, you are the options but i'm to ask if you questions to understand you live. >> host: to give guidanc

-- will indicate that intelligent life might be more likely. if you find life on two planets in the solar system, it will probably develop easily beyond our own solar system. they are finding thousands of planets beyond our own solar system. that is another reason that we are looking at this problem now because it seems more and more likely that there will be life found out there. >> did you arrive with a set of questions that you wanted to answer? >> i did arrive with a general set of questions about what the impact might be, but of course your research is guided as you learn more things. the questions that are raised here are really foundational. for example, if we find extraterrestrial intelligence, you have the question, lots of philosophical questions, like the object of knowledge. -- objective knowledge. is our knowledge objective? is how we see the universe the same as extraterrestrials would see the universe? most scientists would say yes, but philosophers have quite a different answer to that because they think that beings evolve in a

that might be his prime bogeyman, right? waste. what does he come up with in terms of the ways workers conduct themselves? we talk about soldiering a little bit. what is the problem with soldiering? what is soldiering, first of all? a word that has gone completely out of our vocabulary. working the system in the form that you work as little as possible to make it seem like you are working as much as possible. , butitely under working there is effort going into under working. >> yes. work slowdown. very deliberate. how do they happen? why do they happen? >> they talked about the policy that if you work too much you are going to put other people out of business or out of work. and he credits that to the labor unions. and i got a sense through the this that if you insert level of management you can do away with the labor unions because you have someone addressing the issues you are .aving >> yes. very nice. of theous definitely collectivity of workers either in a union or in a compact. even without a union he would say among us and we

you might say that he did, but then you might say, well, this is the sort of problem that the secretaryof war should solve. they're supposed to have the expertise. but there was no evidence that anyone in the war department, either james monroe or john armstrong, had the slightest idea that this was a problem during the war. it would take officers like winfield scott who learned the hard way about what it took to train men. how they managed to treat them about the enemy. because of that, it was always necessary to supplement its numbers with militia. the situation was far worse than few militias. the federal government could call militias under specific conditions, but it had no authorization to give them training. those matters were left to the states, and basically the states did nothing about it in the early 19th century. despite the fact that the prisons said, we have our problems here. congress refused to address it. nevertheless, the fiascos that occurred in the war of 1812 are always associated with emotion. i'll give you two examples. one was the battle of queens heights in 1812

you might have those kinds of questions. so they might signal this. unusually -- let's take same-sex marriage but you're going to get weightier argued from the justices to each other because, dear, they have not talked to each other about this case before this moment. they don't know where it each other stands on this issue. so they're going to use oral argument to telegraph some pics to each other in cases of great importance. so you got a couple of different agendas from the justices point of view. from the advocates point of view, this is his or her moment to find out what do they need to know to rule for me, and to head on confront the other side. they have dueled inviting but they have not been matched up in the moment. and tomorrow, again, i'm sorry to say do more, but let's just say the date, october 6, jeff fisher was a stanford law professor will stand up and represent the defendant who was charged with cocaine trafficking that arose out of this stop from the headlight. and you will make the strongest origin he can all be have opted in fy tha

>> that might be part of it. but i think the bed rom kbrb -- bedrock is we are looking at what might be one of those big corrections in oil prices. they might have been too high for some time. >> they were over a hundred now they are down to what. >> the latest i saw is about 80. >> but oil prices can move very quickly when they start moving like this to a new trading range. so we might see further falls. i don't forecast oil prices i've seen how foolish that is. but it seems to me another indicator which supports-- . >> rose: what does that mean tom freedman had an economy about that today what does that mean for the economies of iran and russia? >> i tend to the view that it's very bad news for people, i would rather like having some bad news it. so for russia it's very bad. there's no question. but with a few exceptions and i can list them, the oil producers are not countries that i would particularly like to have more revenue. >> rose: we put a lot of demand on central banks, haven't we? >> they have the whol

if there's a who pays and what happens when this breach might occur, wherever it might be. the first thing is, that everybody needs to be clear on here in the u.s. it is never the consumer or only very rarely the consumer that suffers any financial loss. and that's because here in the u.s. we have a zero liability policy that i'm sure you've heard about and the bank will take the charges off. so it's not the consumer. and it has to do within the industry who is going to pay. the second thing is as soon as one of these breaches is identified, and they're often identified by the banks themselves or by law enforcement, difficult often for the breached entity to detect it themselves which is a topic that erin might want to talk about. but once identified this huge machinery goes into play where we get the information about the accounts that might have gone through that environment and we get that information out to your banks as consumers you know that your bank has that information and can either monitor your account with special scoring because they know it's been exposed and

it might be if there's a (?)ry off by itself like say australia it might be possible to do in this in a more specific focused way, but this is a blunt instrument anyway. >> ambassador, you referenced history and how nature has already been doing this to you. we've had two events, if those events especially the 18591. happened above new york city, what would happen? >> that was a famous category ton event which burned out all the world's telegraphs which were the only electronics around at the time. telegraphs were about a million times (?) less vulnerable to locator magnetic pulse than what we have today by way of computers and the like. on the other hand, those systems are a million times more capable. they're also a million times more vulnerable. so we have a really terrible vulnerability in our electric grid, and it's just got to get fixed. kennedy: that's absolutely right. and category ton event is what gave way to dynasty. ambassador, thank you very much. wonderful having y y y y y [ male announcer ] eligibl

because of the numbers involved where we might have a larger type of hearing. so we might bring in 30 or 50 or whatever number to try and bring expedited attention to that. and at that point, there is the following that second notice of violation, as you know there is normally this monitoring fee of $52 per month, that is charged but i would say that the opportunity of getting this on track, and minimizing any type of serious cost issue, is very good. and ultimately if people are not being responsive, we will have to refer the case to the city attorney, for litigation. and as you know, we had a very small number of such cases under the unb program which was the only other mandatory retrofit program that we have had to deal with in the department. >> director? >> yeah, first of all, regarding the solar, and that we already, you know, that i already, you know, (inaudible) and our chief building inspector. and before even they passed a code by the state, the biggest issue is, you know, (inaudible) most of the time inspect and that is why we may be reading 90 perce

they might signal of this. i n using a b grade case but let's take same-sex marriage, you are going to get a arguments because they had not talked to each other about this case before this moment. they don't know where the other stands on this issue so they are going to use oral arguments to telegraph things to each other in cases of great importance. you got a couple different agendas from the justice's point of view. from the advocate's point of view this is his or her moment to find out what do they need to know to pull for me and to head on confront the other side. they do is in writing that they have not been matched up in a moment and tomorrow -- sorry to say tomorrow but let's just say the date, october 6th, that justice fisher, a stanford law professor will stand up and represent a defendant who was charged with cocaine trafficking and he will make the strongest argument pecan on behalf of defendants and why the conviction should stand that he will have two a three points he wants to make sure when they

they might have disrupted some plans. they might have pushed isis back from areas in baghdad.hey were nervous that baghdad might fall. so, right now, they are not as nervous about that even though i think they're getting closer to the area. ok, so they disrupted that but isis has clearly moved to other areas. you have to move troops to other areas. they haven't taken back any of those cities. they haven't taken back falluja. falluja fell last january. >> just about a minute you have. turkey is in the headlines. how do you explain to americans how a nato ally needs to be controlled to help protect its own borders by the u.s.? >> i cannot explain that one and i know that is a huge frustration. i could tell with general dempsey that that is a huge frustration that they are not doing anything. they are just not worried about isis coming in and getting them, i guess. until that happens, they will not do anything. they are pushing the turks anyway they can to try to do something, to try to them be more involved. what kind of arguments is the government making? >> well, they're makin

z-map might or might not work. the studies are not in yet. >> stephen: card on the table time, all right. does someone else come down with ebola because this guy had ebola somebody in texas? >> there might be one secondary case, there might be two secondary case. >> stephen: so there could be 100% increase in ebola in the united states. >> that is correct. >> stephen: thank you for that shocking news, doctor. >> thank you. >> stephen: dr. kent sepkowitz, memorial sloan kettering cancer center. we'll be right back, maybe. thank you. ( cheers ( cheers and applause ). >> stephen: welcome to the report, everybody. thank you so much. good to see you. welcome back. nation, i gotta tell you-- and i don't suppose it's necessarily any kind of news flash right now, but being rich is great. the only drawback is sometimes you encounter people who have less money than you have. and what we rich people want more than anything else is to feel separate in our exclusiveness. this is a state known add solitocity. it's a secret word

a lot of people might say, robbery seems like a much lesser felony. that can be an aggravating felony -- >> and it takes it to a felony murder status. >> yes. even an unintentional death during the commission of something like robbery, which is a dangerous felony, not only gets you to murder but potentially makes you eligible for -- >> i think kidnapping would fit that bill as well. sunny, speaking about the violent nature -- not to suggest any murder isn't violent -- but in these particular crimes, we know there's a rape involved. how on earth does someone get away from an aggravated rape committed in 2007, attacking a 25-year-old woman that he had arranged to meet, strangling her, raping her when her body went limp and he served five years? >> that's what's remarkable. rape is a violent fact, of course. but when you talk about that fact pattern, but he serve fd five years and was released and his recidivism moniker was low risk, that's a fail. i think unfortunately we see that a lot when it comes to crimes against women and violence against women. i

you might have a. period of normal growth rate but the dragons, the overhang of weak demandntinued and the wevernment, grow the economy might keep it down. >> is that the reason the stock market went down? >> i think corrections are due. , -- it was reasons more optimistic. partly because it was alternative, if you're getting safeinterest rates on your government bonds, you have to take more risk. that is with the central banks wanted. they wanted people to take more risk. the stock market was very fully valued. people get more nervous of what is going on. they look at what is happening in the emerging world. there are all these elements of concern. the stock market corrects a bit. it was due. at the moment i don't see this as a disaster. the oil price is more interesting. that really is telling you people expect weakening demand. weakening demand in the world economy. that in that -- isn't determined by the saudi government? >> that might be part of it. , we are looking at what my being one of those b

the doctor would tell you what you're going to get, might or might not tell you what is really goingon with you, never would go through the options. >> host: yes, doctor, whatever you say. >> guest: we thought it was our job-don't want to worry people's pretty little heads what might be going on. we rebelled in the '70s, '80s, and '90s we were taught to be doctor informative, i call ill. almost a retail model. go through the options, option a, b., c., talk that the pros and cons and risks and benefits and make the whole menu of options and go, what would you like to do? which one do you want in and invariably you find this, right? they say, i don't know. what would you do, doctor? some what are we taught to say? it's not my decision. this is your decision to make. i'm not deciding for me. you have to be the one to decide. and what is evolving is the recognition -- i saw it when i followed the geriatric doctors and the pal yative care doctors they play the role of counselor and the counselor says these are the options but i need to ask you questions to dish. >> people want guidance. >

but the warning signs you might be suffering from liberalism. experts work with equity experts who work with regional experts that's when expertise happens. mfs. because there is no expertise without collaboration. ñññññ@w fifteen percent or more fifon car insurance.d save you everybody knows that. well, did you know certain cartoon characters should never have an energy drink? action! blah-becht-blah- blublublub-blah!!! geico®. introducing the birds of america collection. fifty stunning, hand-painted plates, commemorating the state birds of our proud nation. blah-becht-blah- blublublub-blah!!! geico®. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. >>> i want to say thanks to our "cashin' crew" for joining us this week. you can see the stock picks on the website. time to wake up, america. while everyone is up in arms with ebola and we must remain vigilant and fight it with all we have, there's another one that's taken everybody -- liberalism. everyone get astro if i, share the wealth, government knows what's best

puc i will yield to miss hale to see what they might do at a january meeting. >> barbara hale, assistant manager for power at the sf puc so we just spoke today, director freed and i, about having a meeting in january. i have asked the commission secretary to consult with the commission president on their calendar about calendaring such a meeting. the way our process works, commissioner, the agenda is set for our commission by our commissioner president in consultation with our general manager and the commission will take actions based on staff recommendations. we have only just received the report so i really don't have a sense of what sort of recommendations we might have but we definitely committed to director freed this morning to have our comments and thoughts to him prior to the next lafco meeting. >> great. i wonder also if the citizens advisory committee for the puc would get a copy of this report. >> we'd be happy to make sure that they receive a copy of the report and we engage with them on a regular basis. we actually have a number of topics scheduled prior to january already i

that's why there might be some confusion as to where these -- if there are other gunmen where it might be. >> and it's a good point that you make that this is a big if, there are other gunmen and let's continue with that. suppose there were other gunmen and, that the ottawa police are correct, that they are looking for multiple suspects, given the layout of this part of ottawa. given that police are obviously on the look without for a shooters to say fire shots in this vicinity and then be able to escape without being notice or blends in to the city or escape in to the woods? >> well, i think there are two ways of looking at this. ottawa is carved out of the woods. you know, there are suburbs all over the place but you can be in the woods quickly. you know, within a 10-minute, 15-minute drive from ottawa. that said it's a government town. there is a probably a greater proportion of police, including the research c m.p. which are the most highly trained in the nation. and military. so if there were a manhunt for somebody with a gun in ottawa, it would not -- i think it would not ultimat

the bill of rights is truly for those who might be unorthodox, who might have an unusual idea, who might not look like everybody else. so we have big debates in washington. i think one of the biggest deebts we have in the last four or five years is whether or not we can detain an american citizen without a trial. i can't imagine anyone who could be for that, but many members of our party were. one senator on the floor said -- i said to him, you can take an american citizen and send them to guantanamo bay without a trial? >> he said, yeah, he's dangerous. i -- anybody meb remember richard jewel everybody thought he was guilty. he was convicted on tv. within hours, it turned out it wasn't him. he wasn't guilty. but can you imagine if he'd been a black man in the south in 1920? what would have happened to him? the bill of rights is to protect minorities, whether it's the color of your skin for shade of your ideology. we need to be the party who stands up for the rights of everyone. we need to proclaim our message with the passion of patrick henry but also proclaim our message with optimism.

you might further try to convince them or unconvince them whatever it might be. but most of it is just straightforward discussion of the merits. >> so justice brennan kind of famously talked about, -- it's a theme two majorities through charm and personal persuasion. >> he was a charming guy brennan wilson. i liked him very, very much. nd he was very effective advocate too. but i'm not sure that charm really persuades many members of the court. think brennan and scalia were very good friends. they were very charming people but they didn't convince themselves all that often. >> i wouldn't ask you what case they might have convinced each other on. >> i don't have one readily in mind. >> so i want to go back to your nomination. so were you surprised to be nominated for the supreme court? >> well, yes. ut after the -- after the -- might explain the time frame was quite short between doug lass' resignation and the nomination and during that period, the newspapers had a list of people that they thought were likely nominees and i was surprised to find myself mentioned p

you never know when their attack might end, if you fight all the way to trial, you might lose. so everyone settles. even those who think they're innocent. unless you're very rich, you can't afford to fight the feds. if they want you, they'll probably get you. and then they may get promoted even if they lie. we invited prosecutors friedrich, caldwell, to reply to the charges laid out in powell's book, but they did not respond. next, life is good for our overlords in washington, d.c.. today most of america's richest counties surround the capital. more excess of our imperial overlords next. take an idea and make it happen. i'm janet long and i formed my toffee company through legalzoom. i never really thought i would make money doing what i love. we created legalzoom to help people start their business and launch their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com we put the law on your side. live. >> upon first entering the home you have this incredibly gracious staircase. >> washington's real estate market is hot. you can really see t

you might be an episcopal priest or faith-based organization. and you may use faith-based language, but you function almost along secular humanitarian prip he wi humanitarian principles, but your belief underpins that work. how to engage on that spectrum is another approach that is what most embassies would be used to working with. catholic relief services, islamic relief and is everythin between. after a war, religious groups may be in a period of questioning or recovery or wondering how to find their way and navigate the reconstruction of their country and of their communities after violence. so that is another space of engagement which is more one might say almost trauma recovery after war, how is it your humanitarian work, community based outreach, can minister in ways that are open and ripe for partnership. so all of this just gives you a flavor of what has been happening at the state department in terms of policy. what is the intention on the ground. and i think actually i'd say the working group we're working on right now is looking at th

but the warning signs you might be suffering from liberalism.ll of the mountain king"♪ ♪ [beeping on the computer] peter come take a look at this. [beeping sounds are more rapid] [beeping sounds are even faster] mr. daniels? mr. daniels? look at this. what's this? the numbers they keep getting bigger and bigger. the clicks are off the charts. yeah the clicks are off the charts. yoshi, i'ts walt. we're back. yes sir! hi. [spoken in japanese] let's go! let's go! let's go! [spoken in japanese & english] i need more trucking. more shipping! more shipping! i need more trees! more trees? i'll get you more trees. hey! take a look at wood pulp. whoa. everything you got on wood pulp. right now! ♪ yeah! he really loves that thing. "hello. you can go ahead and "have a nice flight."re." ♪ music plays ♪ music plays traveling can feel like one big mystery. you're never quite sure what is coming your way. but when you've got an entire company who knows that the fewest cancellations and the most on-time flights are nothing if we can't get your things there, too

it might not be real change. it might not be change as fast as we would like. but yet the hope of some change. prime ministers there can comb and go. their parties might not come and go but certain figures can. certain fixed positions can change. and it's easier for americans to relate to. and it's because of that that i think you've seen the administration's emphasis on iraq. both from experience and possibilities there. in syria, it is a completely different situation. u.s. action against isis, as far as i can tell, does not -- is not part of any kind of sthriege other than to degrade isis overall. there are some caveats to this. for example, trying to hit isis political and military facilities. so to degrade its power primarily in iraq. also, to hit some of the rudimentary oil refineries which have bine set up in the river valley and also in the euphrates river valley. and that's logical. isis sells refined products, crude oil to sustain part of its operation. that's quite smart. but in terms of the overall strikes, the administration is in a bit of a bind p

with those tools and be dependent on therapeutic and might be in this a lot longer.ne months from now we might have a very big epidemic. >> any new therapies on the earth of coming through? >> it is not a virus that should immune from being drugged. there are vtherapeutics includig cancer drugs that look effective for ebola. we maybe even need to manufacturer and stockpiling them so we can have a supply on hand. >> fascinating, thanks so much for being here, scott. >> when we come back, foreign policy returns to the campaign trail as the isis threat takes center stage in tight races. could it cost democrats control of the senate? i'd rather do anything else than sit at a dealership. it's a lot of haggling and it takes so long. craig's experience is completely different than mine. yeah. yes, mike has used truecar. at truecar, we'll show you how much others paid for the car you want, and how much you should. because i used truecar there was no haggling about the price. they treated me so well, and it was just such a quick, easy experience. get your car, and get back to

he might be returning before that. griffin has been back at practice for a while now, looks okay at individual drills. can he stand the heat against live defenders? that's the question. they're trying to impale him. who knows, but they haven't ruled him out yet. >> i'd like to make the decision tomorrow after practice really just because i want a, the team to know who the quarterback is, b, the quarterback to know who the quarterback is and c, we need to know who it is for game plan purposes. >> we am bark upon another dallas week again. burgundy and gold, metallic silver and blue. this rivalry transforms mere mortals to legendary lore, numbers, novelty, numb skulls. this rivalry has it all. ♪ hail to the -- ♪ hails have been hollow during the dan era. burgundy and gold is 9-21 against dallas under snyder. unacceptable! but hey, you just never know in this series. there have been hail marys or hail losses. a foot race? not. robert truly became rg3 when he carved up dallas a few thanksgivings back. remember? there have

might affect us. we are opening even banks, some banks now are open sundays. the government might be doing that also. i think that would be good. it's great that came up and it should keep going. >> great, thank you. any other public comment on the directors report? seeing none. public comment is closed. okay. i would like to make a motion to move item no. 3 to our meeting on the 27th. >> second. all in favor say, "aye". >> aye. >> any opposed? >> he couldn't make it. so he gets a pass for that. next item, please. >> all right. commissioners, we are now on item no. 11, president's report. >> i just have one thing to report. i attended the merchants event at flora grub in the bayview. i have to tell you, i really, that's like an awesome place. i was surprised and how thriving that neighborhood was. all the little businesses around there. it was really cool. on behalf of the office of small business and it was a great event. so other than that i have nothing else. >> next item? >> item no. 12 is vice-pr

you might hear, "naga def," so you might hear, "bla ga da, mangi flec, blanka da, blankadi bla dah, bleat bla-bla-bla-bla-bla." so as you could see there's a direct connection with the spoken language, and what is being played, and how you express it on the drum. mandiani is a rhythm that comes out of the old malian empire. the drums and the instruments that they use for the rhythm mandiani come from the djembe orchestra. the djembe orchestra encompasses maybe two or three djembes, usually one principal musician and the bass. this is the djun-djun, and this is the song na. you have the bottom here which would be considered the one, or the downbeat. that's more of the gravity part of the rhythm. this is the upside of the rhythm. and then you have the bell part which is playing, what i learned as an african six. and usually is: one, two, three, four, five, six. one, two, three, four, five, six. when you put all the parts together-- [rhythmic drum beats] it's always the principal musician who'll give the cue to start, to stop, and to change the rhythm. he is the conductor of the orchestra. a

so, the filibuster might be acceptable, might, for let's say in the senate. if you really thought it was about rules of deliberation. the senate does not have to have the same rules as the house. you should have somewhat different rules from the house. but you can make a fairly good argument that -- it happened in the modern senate with a 60 vote requirement, that the rule of deliberation and the rule of decision have converged. it is not a rule of deliberation -- it is no longer about debate. if you cannot get closure on your motion, you cannot bring it to a decisive vote. that is a rule of decision. it is no longer about deliberation. the constitution is very specific about when we need super majorities. you need 2/3 members in both houses. for constitutional amendments. you need 2/3 in the senate for the ratification of treaties. 2/3 in the senate for the conviction of a president or somebody else on impeachment charges. 3/4 to approve constitutional amendments. so very well-known rules. [speaking latin] when the constitution is explicit about when super m