couldn't get ahold of this information ever and have we have to stay domestically but mike rogers isn't allowing any of these substantial numbers to come up for a vote so on the one hand he's saying that he is concerned about privacy but on the other he's not allowing substantial and them and come to the house floor tiles are there are major companies that are supporting this bill corporations like google and facebook these companies oppose so but they are backing cispa why is that what i have today. well i first of all google actually isn't supporting this bill this is another misleading statement i have by mike rogers they've been talking to him about it trying to narrow the civil liberties are trying to help with civil liberties concerns but they haven't supported it facebook did support the bill but again they have also expressed expressed civil liberties concerns and the parts of the bill that we are worried about facebook actually came out and said that they don't want and they don't either and they won't use them if the bill comes to fruition and they said that they weren't even

would support the bill but if these amendments came up for a vote that they would not oppose it and mike rogers then came out with a statement saying oh it's enough for democracy democracy for technology is on board and then all of a sudden rogers pulled the rug out from under him and said actually the amendments that you asked for we're not going to vote on and so he used it as kind of a marketing ploy where he could tell other people that civil liberties groups are being are you know happy with this bill when in fact the opposite is true so they and they got. a little bit last thing that i want to ask you to is that cash might help run for him say that some of this is actually based on a model something at the f.b.i. has been using for years can you tell us more about that. right so there it is the f.b.i. has kind of found a way to do this without a bill allowing companies to share information with them that they normally otherwise wouldn't share and then we can see this from the other the other way to you know this bill allows the government to share information companies a company's share o

so that there is a representative mike rogers comparing it to like a cyber cyber pearl harbor what is your response to that fear i mean it's just incoherent i mean is saying that because america is being spied on and we need to start spying on america too it just doesn't make any sense if you want to keep the internet secure if you want to prevent people from being spied on what you need to do is listen to what every security expert has said which is build tools that secure the internet that make it safer or that make it more resistant to attack that's not what this bill does at all what it does is it puts the internet in the control of the pentagon and it allows the pentagon to start spying on american citizens that's not going to secure anybody this fellow also allows companies in the pentagon were detained this information from companies like google like facebook and give it to agencies like homeland security like n.s.a. like the f.b.i. what then could the government do with that information. and that's one of the things is the bill puts very little restrictions on what they could

. >> the policy and the politics with house intelligence chairman mike rogers and ranking democrat. >>> then never too late to talk vp stakes in election 2012. with dana dash and jeff zeleny "the new york times." i'm candy crowley, and this is "state of the union." >>> a new cnn/orc poll shows president obama's job approval rating is over 50% for the first time since last june, but americans are worried about rising gas prices, and in an election year, when americans worry, politicians act. the president wants congress to end tax breaks for big oil. >> it's time they got by without more help from taxpayers, who are already having a tough enough time paying the bills and filling up their gas tank. >> it will never get by congressional republicans. joining me now from louisville, kentucky, senate republican leader mitch mcconnell. thank you for joining us. senator, i want to talk to you about gas prices. i know that you have suggested that this seems like a weird political move for the president to be making, that you don't think it will be popular. and i want to show our viewers a rece

>> i would actually disagree with mike rogers. the first earmarks were presented to reagan in a transportation bill in 1982 and he vetoed the bill. it only had eight in it. he said send me a bill with none and they did. what you can see it you can correlate the increase in spending in congress with a number of earmarks. as the earmarks rose, the amount of spending rose, and the reason that happened is when you put something in a bill, you don't care what's in the rest of the bill. you vote for it because you have an earmark in it. if you don't vote for it, the chairman of the appropriations committee comes and says will you never get anymore earmarks. what happens is earmarks become the way we grow. quite frankly, there is still tons of earmarks in the bills because we're still funding projects that were started before there was an earmark moratorium. >> aren't there some projects, though, as an elected person and you get elected to go in and fight for your people and earmarks are a way where you fight for your people which is wha

chairman mike rogers will hold a press conference later this morning.their bill passed last december. once again, this and the ongoing fight against sign r security. >>> organizers of the cherry blossom parade will join the line of festivities this week. singer marie oz monday will be among the honorary marshals of the parade saturday. it includes marching bands from across the country and elaborate floats. . >>> 100 years ago today the titanic set sail fromening land to new york. >> more than 700 people survived. once again, it set sail this day 100 years ago. >>> we're watching a deadline in the middle east. >> the deadline that syria must meet as more violence breaks out in the war torn nation. >>> and the maryland general assembly, they passed a few bills. we'll tell you all about that. >>> also at 5:00 it's called the ways to work program. how a program in d.c. is helping people buy used cars to make repairs. right now we'll head down to atlanta, home to the world's busiest airport. we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] at southwest airlines,

. >> reporter: congressman mike rogers said there is no specific threat to the homeland. >> all the affiliates have it for these anniversaries. where all the pieces come together next week they will take it. they might not. they are patient. >> reporter: the obama administration has a new campaign ad. when john brennan was asked if it's appropriate to polite see size the anniversary of that an raid he said he didn't do politics. >>> the white house correspondents dinner was about who is who and who could get the best laughs, jimmy kimmel or the commander in chief. >>> remember, if you have a story idea, call the fox 5 tip line, 202-895-3,000 or you can e-mail your tips to fox 5 tips at wttg.com. at wttg.com.  >>> funny man jimmy kimmel didn't hold back during the white house correspondents dinner. he hosted and made president obama the butt of many jokes. nothing is off limits from north korea's rockets to the secret service scandal. >> i'll tell you what, i know the administration has been cracking down but if this happened on president clinton's watch you can dam well bet the syning ac

leader harry reid, senate appropriations committee chairman, a number of republicans including mike rogers, a republican of alabama, have been clamoring for the restoration of earmarks. representative rogers said earmarks are required in order to pass legislation referring mostly to the transportation bill which had trouble reaching the house floor not because of a lack of earmarks but because it's simply too expensive. senator reid stated often that earmarking has been going on since we were a country and there is a constitutional obligation for congressionally directed spending. senator inoway says he will do everything he can to reinstate earmarks. until a permanent ban taxpayers will be justified in believing that members ever congress are creative in trying to skirt the moratorium and continuing to obtain earmarks. it is reasonable to conclude that the 59 members of the senate who voted against senator toomey's amendment would like to continue having earmarks. as in previous years all of the items in gagw's pig book meet our 7-point criteria established in 1991 in conjunction with the

. >> reporter: that jives with what congressman mike rogers, the chairman of the house intelligence committee said a few days ago. >> al qaeda is bigger than the core and some of that core, core leadership is still around and, ayman al-zawahiri is still in charge and providing inspirational leadership and guidance. >> reporter: wednesday the fbi an dhs released an advisory, ma, al qaeda might try to mark the one-year anniversary of his death with a terrorist attack in the u.s. and officials gave no specifics and the white house said that is because there really aren't any. >> at this time we have no credible information that terrorist organizations including al qaeda are plotting attacks in the u.s., to coincide with the anniversary of bin laden's death. however, we assess that aq's affiliates and allies remain intent on conducting attacks in the homeland and possibly to action venni avenge the death of bin laden, but not necessarily tied to the anniversary. >> and there is talk of whether the obama administration is political sizing the one-year anniversary and, john brennan said this mornin

the cyber war committees are also the ones will sponsor in this bill both dutch ruppersberger and mike rogers are ranking members of the permanent select committee on intelligence and rogers to explain that he's backing this bill because every day u.s. businesses are targeted by nation state actors like china for cyber exploitation and theft the broad base of support for this bill shows that congress recognizes the urgent need to help our private sector better defend itself from these attacks how convenient right throwing a little line about china being the bad guys and the fear. longer the fear mongering the crap out of politicians until they sign on to this bill but sadly that's kind of what's happening that's far this bill oddie has one hundred sponsors after all you want to speak out against national security and those are the only politicians in favor of cisco there are a large number of corporations that are voicing their support see facebook microsoft arisan an i.b.m. they're all months of corporations who think that since it is a good idea to andrew coots over at digital trends the re

house and the senate right now you know this is the last we're going to see of this whether or not mike rogers changes the bill or not i think he is making sure everybody's informs because when you hear cybersecurity just like you better stop internet piracy you think oh well that sounds great and everybody is for that but it's really when you get into the details of the bill that it starts to become scary realize what they're actually trying to do or what the bill would would allow them to do so right now we're just trying to make sure we get people as informed as possible and you know the best way you can do that sometimes is through social media and once people realize what the dangers in the bill are we're confident that they will contact their congressman just like during the sopa debate when the congressman had to basically you know disavow their their co-sponsorship of sopa because they realized how many constituents cared so we really want we just want people to know what's in the bill and for them to act on it once they find out. lastly and this is. why i would cut off topic but i jus

the author of the of the bill are now getting the picture the original co-sponsors congressman mike rogers and ruppersberger announce of their open to changes today amendments are proposed in a hearing and over all these amendments of lassoing the government creating limits on how they could use the data handed over from the companies saying if the information could only be used to protect national security and couldn't be used in any other instances beyond anything labeled as a cyber threat but a cyber threat is still very vague so that really could be enough to make this a good bill we're going to get into that tomorrow but for now just know the opposition is gaining some traction. well there are a lot of eyes directed at the public display of military power from pakistan today as less than a week after india test fired a nuclear capable missile they did the same but considering that diplomatic negotiations between the two countries have been on the upswing lately is it really worth worrying about or is that just the typical nuclear brinkmanship where even frenemies have to every now and

now mike rogers further defended his proposal by saying every day u.s. businesses are targeted by nation state actors like china for cyber exploitation and that the broad based support for this bill shows that congress recognizes the urgent need to help our private sector better defend itself from the u.s. attacks which segues right into the private sector and its role in all of this the private contractors hired by corporations by the government they can always be counted on to exaggerate the threat just like math these anti-virus firm did and that could be released a report back in two thousand and nine explaining that data theft and breaches from cyber crime may have cost businesses up to a trillion dollars globally and lost intellectual property now i hate to burst anyone security bubble here but it makes perfect sense that mcafee would be conducting these studies because that just will have been sell their bottom line and in fact an op ed in the new york times this week provides you leading economist says that we should probably reassess how serious

online espionage and i want to read you a couple of passages from an op ed rendell by representative mike rogers and representative dutch route through provider first one here is every morning in china thousands are. going to start here china has stolen from u.s. companies the amount of intellectual property equal to fifty times the current print collection of the library of congress. and i go on now to say that i'm going to bring up the other one here. every morning in china thousands of highly trained computer spies now wake up with one mission to steal u.s. intellectual property that the chinese can use to further their economic growth so clearly declan they're trying to address this problem of cyber espionage that they are saying is harming our own economy what then do you make of that argument well and ruth they have a perfectly reasonable argument. this side of cyber espionage is happening it's not new it's hard to differentiate between state actors and that is to actual governments and individuals the question is is the cure worse than the disease here and you had members of congress sayi

. >> congressman mike rogers says there is no specific threat to the homeland. >> all the affiliates have the anniversaries, they are going to try to find where all the pieces come together. they are patient they'll wait. >> reporter: the obama's campaigns has a new ad. when john brennan was asked if it is propose to politicize the anniversary of that raid brennan said he doesn't do politics. >>> politics took a back seat to comedy in washington over the weekend. >> jimmy kimmel headlined the white house correspondent's dinner. but first tucker barnes. >> reporter: we have cool temperatures today, upper 40s, low 50s should be a decent start for your work julie wrigh right after the break. ♪ okay, so who ordered the cereal that can help lower cholesterol and who ordered the yummy cereal? yummy. that's yours. lower cholesterol. lower cholesterol. i'm yummy. lower cholesterol. i got that wrong didn't i? [ male announcer ] want great taste? honey nut cheerios. want whole grain oats that can help lower cholesterol? honey nut cheerios. it's a win win. good? [ crunching, sipping ] be happy.

. >> i would actually disagree with mike rogers. the first earmarks were presented in a transportation bill in 1982 and reagan vetoed the bill. you can correlate the increase in spending in congress with ear marks. the reason that happened is when you put something in a bill you don't care what's in the rest of the bill, you vote for it because you have an earmark in it. if you don't vote it the chairman says you will never get more earmarks. earmarks become the way of how we grow. there are still tons of earmarks in the bills because we are funding projects that were started before there was a moratorium. >> aren't there some projects you get elected to fight for your people and earmarks are a way to fight for your people which is what you are elected to do, right? >> you have to put it in context. if the country is strangling on the debt what should be your first obligation? control the spending and eliminate the debt or is it to continue to send money that we don't have back to states to enhance individuals? i would tell you the

author of that bill is michigan congressman mike rogers, chairman of the house intelligence committeece to have you with us. >> jenna, great to see you again. jenna: congressman, you said in the past a catastrophic cyberattack is headed for this country. what exactly do you mean by that? >> well, if you think about it, we're right now under incredible theft from the chinese espionage, russian espionage of our intellectual property but nation states have been also developing the capability to shut down whole networks. and i'm not just talking about denial of service where you reboot and plug it back in. they can actually destroy your machine. imagine if you went into the bank and stuck in your card and not only read all zeros or read not anything at all and bank couldn't tell you what is in your account and multiply that over thousands and thousands of times. it could shut down critical infrastructure like our electrical grid which would cause chaos and harm to the economy a and nonnation-state actors are trying to get this capability and unfortunately irrational nation-state actors, n

alabama congressman mike rogers says that tackling special interest projects on to bills could get some fence. other supporters argue earmarks have funded crucial projects. watchdog groups say the negatives outweigh the good. >> what they are essentially saying is we can't get the bill passed, and so we want to buy off lawmakers, buy their votes with earmarks with pork barrel projects. >> last year house republicans imposed a temporary ban on earmarks and senate democrats followed suit after president obama threatened to start vetoing bills with earmarks on them. >>> you can tour hundreds of museums around the world with just a click of the mouse. it has just added 1,500 works from around the world. you can even take the virtual visit to the white house which includes a 360-degree tours of the public rooms. >>> let's talk about our weather, a nice day here in the bay area. back to rosemary orozco filling in for chief meteorologist bill martin. are we looking at some rain this week or maybe not. >> it's just what's crossing over our path right now is a fairly weak system. it's moisture s

that's one of the defense we named mike rogers a republican our porker of the month.ost: porker of the month if des moines yes. we do the porker every month. and he said that earmarks are necessary to get bills like the transportation bill passed. because you have to get earmarks in order to essentially buy votes. that's what his premise -- host: so if we're talking carrots and sticks, these could be the carrots at the leadership can offer their members to get them to vote? guest: that's right. but the 82 freshman republicans have no interest. they're interested in the cost so you've got the older members saying we have to do business as usual because that's the way to get legislation zphruff the newer members saying don't spend so much money. we don't care about whether we get a little project if your district. host: mike rogers also in one of the stories that it read seem to indicate that people are so concerned about gridlock. here is a good way to push through some of that gridlock in congress is if we can get people to join in on votes by offering them certain th

>> well, the problem of daily cyber attacks has gotten so huge here is congressman mike rogers who co-sponsoredthe last few years, it is estimated that the chinese government alone has stolen more intellectual property from american corporations and businesses. it would be equivalent to filling the library of congress print collection 50 times. >> these are billions of dollars in losses. as you mentioned, that 1940s law prevents the intelligence community from sharing classified information with private industry. so they know about these attacks. they now to prevent these attacks. but they can't tell industry unless they remove this hurdle, shep. >> shepard: the privacy concerns to many are very real that eventually or at any time the government could use this to spy on our own people. >> absolutely. and the white house is saying that they will veto this bill. >> we have a long memory, we remember our nation's dark path. martin luther king's jr. telephone was wiretapped. his hotel room was pirpd. his home was wiretapped. could companies share personal information about consumers other companies

>> guest: the mike rogers bill.rtened version of the name there are lot of privacy and are liberty concerns. privacy and civil liberties group and democrats and ranking member bennie thompson raised concern about it because partially of information-sharing that can happen between the private sector and nsa there is some concern that the information being given will go straight to the intelligence agencies and that essentially you're creating a opportunity to create surveillance on domestic citizens that nsa and others are not allowed to do. >> host: how are the concerns being followed up upon? >> guest: there have been some adjustments to the bill over last month or last week i should say including trying to strengthen the privacy and civil liberties provisions within the bill. there are attempts to make sure that it relates to civil to cyber security as opposed to any other purpose. that hasn't been backed by any of the critics out there. >> host: one headline in cq, democrats to shape agenda at cybersecurity bills

host: the main bill -- guest: mike rogers from michigan and -- from maryland. here is a bill from mike mccall from texas which will look at research and development efforts, trying to facilitate the national science foundation efforts to do it cyber work- force research and development and also to increase workforce development -- effort. also a bill by representative rand paul which will deal with research and development more on the scientific side, so looking at r&d and networking. a cyber bill per se but expanding an existing program to cybersecurity. and from representative issa from california which looks at information security with the federal government. fifa -- federal information -- fisma 2.0, fixing what was not fixed the first time around. host: once it is done -- what happens? does it get rolled into a single bill? guest: i think after this week what you will see is a rule and a bill -- the rogers bill, going forward under that and possibly pass. they're concerned about that as we can talk about. the other three bills would go into -- and it is lik

senate appropriations committee chair and daniel and away, a number of republicans including cagw's mike rogers to public and have been clamoring for the restoration of earmarks. representative rogers had earmarks are required in order to pass legislation referring mostly to the transportation bill, which is a trouble reaching the house floor not because of a lack of earmarks but because it is simply too expensive. senator reid has stated often earmark it has been going on since her country and there is a constitutional obligation for congressionally spending. senator in a way will do everything he can to reinstate earmarks. until it permanent ban is established, taxpayers will be justified in believing members of congress are being created in trying to skirt the moratorium and continue to obtain earmarks. it is certainly reasonable to close to 59 members of the senate who voted against senator to me's amendment would like to continue having earmarks. as in previous years all of the items in cagw's congressional pig book meet our criteria which was established in 1991 in conjunction with the bi

this important legislation is authored by chairman mike rogers and co-sponsored by ranking member dutch ruppersberger. and i thank the gentleman and yield back. mr. hoyer: i thank the gentleman for his information. the gentleman in his comments indicates we might go to conference on the surface transportation bill. as the gentleman knows the senate surface transportation bill passed overwhelmingly and with a very substantial bipartisan vote and a vote led by senator boxer and senator inhofe of oklahoma. there were 22 republican senators, about half the republican senators voted for it. and so it passed overwhelmingly. i'm wondering given the time frame in which we are dealing whether or not the gentleman feels comfortable with some assurance that we are going to move to go to conference so we can get a conference under way. i know that's -- the majority indicated it wanted a bill so it could go to conference. i have had discussions with i think you, but i know mr. boehner, the speaker, and mr. mccarthy that that was the intent. to go to conference. would it be -- what would preclude us,

rise in reluctant opposition to the bill but i want to acknowledge the extraordinary work done by mike rogers and our ranking member, dutch ruppersberger. these two gentlemen have changed the nature and culture of our committee, made it far more productive and have done great work getting us to this great point. there is still work to be done, and i want to talk about that. in two areas. i want to acknowledge why we are here. we do ourselves a disservice when we talk about a cyberthreat. that sounds like something that may come in the future, something to be concerned about that might take place down the line. we are under cyberattack right now. this is not speculative. this is not intangible. this is happening right now, so this needs to be dealt with and we do need a sense of urgency. there is distance yet to go. and in two areas in particular. one, when we gather cyberinformation and we share it between companies or between the government and companies as we must do, we want to make sure we minimize any unnecessary invasion of privacy of the marn people. and we can do -- american people. a

it was 65 years from mike's first appearance on camera, a world war ii on the navy, to his last appearance, an interview with rogerlemens. >> and never anabolic steroids? >> never. >> reporter: 65 years. ♪ >> reporter: it's strange but for such a tough guy, mike's all-time favorite interview with one with another, pianist, vladimir horowitz. he played "the stars and stripes forever." it almost brought tears to the toughest guy on television. ♪ >> astonishing what you learn and feel and see along the way. that's why a reporter's job, as you know, is such a joy. ♪ >>> on cbs's "face the nation" bob schieffer gave an emotional farewell to mike wallace. >> mike was a great friend and mentor to me. he even gave me a compliment once and he was one of the real pioneers in television journalism all going to miss him. >>> next sunday, april 16 lt "60 minutes" plans a full tribute to mike wallace. you can see that right here on cbs. >>> now to the shooting rampage that left three people dead. the incident happened in tulsa, oklahoma. two men have been arrested and are due in court this morning. investigators say they found

roger clemens. >> will people believe you? >> his poor health forced him to step away for good. randall princeton, cbs news. >> other friends and colleagues are remembering mike wallace tonight. the cbs news chairman said that he loved the fact that if he showed up for an interview, and made people nervous. roger ailes from fox news said that wallace was actually trying to serve the audience and that is what made him great. abc news president said that millions turned in every sunday night to see who would be on the receiving end of his interrogations'. a special program dedicated to wallace will be broadcast on 60 minutes next sunday april 15th. >> part of a busy freeway closed for 24 hours. it is all because of this, a gas tanker fire. why the time for the reopening of the firfreeway keeps get pushed back. >> why united is getting out. >> a lovely easter weekend, with increasing clouds and warm temperatures continuing through the night. we'll see a chance of showers moving into the picture from north to south through the day tomorrow. your forecast coming up next. faug >> after this tanker truck fire. a gasoline tanker caught fire last night and crashed nea

. >> roger clemens: 24, 25 years, mike, you think i'd get an inch of respect. an inch.rove your innocence? >> wallace: apparently you haven't done it yet. and this? >> pelley: and another controversial newsmaker-- dr. death, jack kevorkian-- went to prison after giving mike this tape. >> jack kevorkian: we're going to inject in your right arm. >> pelley: it shows kevorkian administering a lethal injection to a gravely ill patient who wanted to die. >> wallace: is he dead now? >> kevorkian: he's dying now. >> wallace: there is something almost ghoulish in your desire to see the deed done. >> kevorkian: it appears that way to you-- i can't criticize you for that. but the main point is the last part of your statement-- that the deed be done. >> pelley: but the most shocking interview mike ever did is surely the one with vietnam veteran paul meadlo on "60 minutes" in 1969. >> paul meadlo: i might have killed about ten, 15 of them. >> pelley: meadlo confessed his role in the my lai massacre, the vietnam atrocity by american troops that appalled the nation. even mike was surp