unfortunately, it was not foreseen, we must understand that this is both the ministry of economy and the ministry of strategic industries . by the ministries of economy and the ministry of strategic industries of industrial production in the interests of the military-industrial complex, including from the e-e in the interests of the e-e armed forces and other military formations. that is, it means other in the words that the entire private defense industry remained beyond the attention of the state and the survival of each individual private defense enterprise depends on the persistence of its direct manager and the ability to find his city in this chain of arms supply. another enterprise is simply dying, yes, unfortunately, today it is like that. okay, then the question arises that now the ministry of defense directly relies on special exporters, which include of the ministry of defense and the impression that directly in the art of defense is now the main bet on in two directions, this is foreign military equipment that comes in the form of military aid and special exporters who try to meet the needs of the ministry o

we must understand that this is the ministry of economy and the ministry of strategic industries is oneon , important detail of this moment there is the fact that in us, well, this is my personal opinion, we have a divided industry between the ministries of the economy and the ministry of strategic industries, and this division does not give opportunities today to say more precisely who should be responsible for e-e enterprises for, including for the private sector that produce products in the interests of the military-industrial complex, including from e-e in the interests of e-e armed forces and other military formations. that is, it means in other words that the entire private defense industry remained beyond the attention of the state and the survival of each individual private defense enterprise depends on the persistence of its direct manager and the ability to find his place in this chain of arms supply. if this fails, then it's just that this area of ​​competence, which was connected with one or another enterprise, is simply dying, yes, unfortunately, today it is like that. okay

of the defense-industrial complex for a certain perspective. it is quite unclear to me why this initiative of ukroboronprom, if it has the exclusive competence of the ministry of strategic industries, how can ukroboronprom take part in this? in my opinion, today the enterprises of ukroboronprom must be transferred to the operational management of the ministry of strategic industries of industry, which made it possible to make certain decisions more quickly, including on moving around the location of production on providing state support to these enterprises, but we have what we have e-e p yuri, now they are talking about lend-lease programs that should ensure the supply of weapons there by the united states, but in view of previous experiments, this is actually an opportunity for the development of the industry's own defense in a new format or we have an opportunity to cooperate with the states to look at the future of our defense industry in a new way and start, let's say, the radical transformation of our pc and the creation of new conditions for the manufacture of military equipment. well, in this case you need to tell the truth. today, it seems to me that there is n

order therefore, this led to a certain slowdown in the development of the defense-industrial complex, the inability of the ministry of strategictries to make operational decisions in 2020-21 the slowdown in the development of other defense-industrial complex, including the purchase of weapons and military equipment of domestic production, that is, we can actually say that we lost the 19th, 20th, and 21st years to organizational measures and structural changes in the defense industry, which in fact they did not speed up the production of certain samples, on the contrary, they made the procedures more difficult, you can say yes, it is true, it is true, we practically lost 19-21 years of procurement of domestic weapons, the advantage was renewed including by the foreign brother of the border procurement of samples of armed military equipment. this gave such a negative signal of the domestic pc that over the past three years, well, on our on us, according to our analysis, part of the enterprise with portals its production because they did not see their prospects in providing arming the troops, well , arming the armed forces and ot

the defense-industrial complex, the inability to make an operational decision by the ministry of strategic industries they are proven to slow down the development of our of the defense-industrial complex, including the purchase of domestically produced military equipment, we can say that we lost the 19th, 20th, and 21st years to organizational measures and structural changes in the defense industry, which in fact did not speed up the production of certain samples, but on the contrary made the procedures more difficult, so you can say, yes, it is true, let it be true, we practically lost 19-21 years of procurement of domestic weapons, the preference was given to foreign ones as well the brother of the procurement of the economy of armaments of military equipment this gave such a negative signal of the domestic pc that over the past three years, well, on our on us according to our analysis , part of the enterprise from the portal its own production because they did not see their perspective in the provision of weapons, well, the provision of weapons to the armed forces and other military formations, th

of russian retail wtc strategic session. representatives of the largest retail chains and the head of the ministry of industry and trade tookussian retail chains will be eased working conditions in the near future marginal market share. when transactions in retail will increase from 25 to 35% the bill is already in the state duma now the network share, which in the region exceeds a quarter, cannot buy or rent additional retail space. we did it deliberately, i mean, as i said the statement of foreign companies about the possible withdrawal of the older market. or that we didn't end up with you. in violation of the law, which limits the share of a possible presence to twenty-five percent, another measure to support russian businessmen. cabinet will subsidize advertising. in the twenty-second year, in a pilot mode, federal networks will allocate half a billion rubles for this, they talk about the promotion of products made within the country as a whole, the situation is, again, familiar to our user, which is quite stable, but uh. now there is a good opportunity for russian brands to develop. she understands that we are develop

necessary in critical and strategic industries - this is aircraft manufacturing, and heavy power engineering instrumentation is also oil and gas equipment, and the head of the ministrye russian authorities managed to achieve the planned share of import substitution in those areas that were recognized as priorities back in 2014, when it all started, we are talking about more than 20 industries. we never had plans to replace imports by 100%. i think this is simply unreasonable, even today, even in the current situation, when western countries refuse to supply their units, component materials, and there is seriously the second half of the world that is ready to do this to replace imports. all at once. firstly, it is quite expensive, and secondly, such an approach will not give a positive economic effect. import substitution must be 100% where it is a matter of national security. we are talking about the defense industry enterprise and military products. and how do you perceive the essence of import substitution, because while manturov has deciphered it because of his opinion , i will honestly tell you that i also perceived import substitution, how it does its own. well