so that was the advantage of nafta. the lower wages. >> at some point bob bowen decided he had to take action. he swapped the conveyor belt for the works council. but of course he couldn't stop the decline of ypsilanti. his grandson does still have a job in the auto supply industry. here is $18 an hour, his wages haven't gone up for years. he is concerned about the stagnation of pain levels in the u.s. blue-collar sector. billy: when i make now is what my granddaddy made in ththe 70'. itit is hard to o do that now wh inflation. the cost o of living whahave, increasing taxes. our union dues went t up this year. it is harder to do. >> one result of nafta. the relocation of work from here to mexico. bob: i really thought nafta would help us. i i didn't realize there was no labor protection, no way of making sure that things were fair. the whole advantage of rporationsns moving their was just screwing the workers greg: the people that have control are very greedy. momoney rules theieir decisions. people like us, the working

disaster.is a total nafta has been a disaster. now we have a new one coming up, transpacific partnership. it is going to make nafta look like peanuts. we are going to cut it out. we're going to stop it. it will be detrimental as hell to the people up there and all of the people in united states lyingther way, ted cruz, ted cruz, lying ted. one of the great liars of all time. ted. how are y doing with trump? we winning, winning, winning. and then you see him on stage. i am up to million votes. something like that. 2 million votes. how are you doing with trump? i am doing great. tomorrow is a big day, tomorrow we're going to show ted cruz, who hates new york, hates new york. when you look at that debate and you see the way he talked about us and new york values, here is a man that turned down standing money for this state and plenty of other money. we had lots of things coming votedew york that he against. no new yorker can vote for ted cruz and no new yorker can vote for john kasich when he was the one who approved nafta. he voted

kasich was in favor of nafta. nafta has killed connecticut. it has killed hartford.t has killed big parts of our country. you cannot have people and you cannot vote for people who voted in favor of nafta. it is no good. it is no good. so, i started off with illegal immigration and trade. let me tell you -- let's talk trade because connecticut more than anything else. boy, do you need jobs. we need jobs. we are going to bring jobs back in. we are not going to be the dummies that lose all of our jobs. we are going to be the smart ones. there is one of the dummies. get him out of here. get him out. there is nothing more fun than a trump rally. nothing. get him out. all right. all right. look. do we love our country? [cheering] are we going to take our country back? are we not going to be this stupid people anymore? we are led by people who are grossly incompetent. they don't know what they are doing. militarily, we cannot beat isis. we have people that have no clue. that is going to end, folks, it is going to end. it is going to end right after this election. it is goin

nafta is a disaster.hings ever signed in the history of this country from an economic standpoint. nafta, it sucked our jobs away. it sucked them away. and john kasich approved nafta when he was in congress. he was a deciding vote for nafta. and it was signed by president bill clinton. there's a relative that's going to be running for office. signed by clinton. >> we're going to break away from donald trump right now to get back to our colleague, political reporter kevin rader. forgive me for my lack of hoosier hospitality there. you talk about how close the polls have been in that state. five days to go. it may very well decide the nomination ultimately, or at least decide that ted cruz cannot be the nominee going forward. is indiana more like a wisconsin? there's obviously no scott walker in a state like indiana. or what is indiana similar for, for people in america trying to get a sense of how hoosiers are thinking? >> well, similarities would be manufacturing. obviously indiana is leading manufacturing

kasich was in favor of nafta. nafta has killed connecticut. it has killed hartford.t has killed big parts of our country. you cannot have people and you cannot vote for people who voted in favor of nafta. it is no good. it is no good. so, i started off with illegal immigration and trade. let me tell you -- let's talk trade because connecticut more than anything else -- boy, do you need jobs. we need jobs. we are going to bring jobs back in. we are not going to be the dummies that lose all of our jobs. we are going to be the smart ones. there is one of the dummies. get him out of here. get him out. there is nothing more fun than a trump rally. nothing. get him out. all right. alright. look. do we love our country? [cheering] are we going to take our country back? are we not going to be this stupid people anymore? we are led by people who are grossly incompetent. they don't know what they are doing. militarily, we cannot beat isis. we have people that have no clue. that is going to end, folks, it is going to end. it is going to end right after this election. it is goin

boy, am i right, it will make nafta look like a baby. it is worse than 1/2 taft you better make sure your politicians better not approve it. when i get in office i will get real trade deals that bring our jobs back. rely on it. rely on it. [cheering] rely on it. so, but isn't that amazing? i said give me a little information on the area. i know the area well. i thought you were doing better than that! so here's a story. i was just talking to some of the very talented reporters backstage and, you know the system, folks, is rigged. it is a rigged system. now you have to understand, i'm not complaining about the states that i won. those are okay. of which i won i think 22 and cruz won 10. did you ever hear him say, i'm the only one, lyin' ted cruz, lyin' ted, has bible up here, puts it down. he is a liar! [shouting] oh, boy, does he lie. but the system's rigged. and i'll tell you what. when you look at colorado, people can say, well that is the way the game played. look, they should have had an election. they didn't have election. that syst

she was talking about the need not to sign the successor to nafta.positions on the trade issue which resonates in rust belt states. this is where you see trump driving a lot of enthusiasm in this area as well. manufacturing jobs have been lost. some of that was directed by policy and we have a choice about that in this country. >> talk about what you think is going to happen on tuesday. sanders has a strong ground game in wisconsin. what do you think will come to pass? fact that it is an open primary will not be so significant this year. in some years you see republicans voting democratic primaries are democrats voting in republican primaries just to make trouble. they are so focused on their own camps that there will not be a whole lot of that. i think if there is high turnout, sanders will win. is being given a z.n for his money by cru the only issue in wisconsin is -- new voter id law, whether students had to get a special form of id to vote, and some do not know that yet. john: thanks for joining us. always a pleasure. we you come back and take o

>> well, i think -- if he could repeal nafta he would. i can't think of anybody who has opposed trade agreements more than bernie sanders. he understands that trade agreements like nafta and trade relations with china and other agreements have cost american workers millions of jobs. anything that can be done to turn back the clock on trade agreements bernie would support today. >> i want to ask you about the reality for the next president, assuming that the revolution that bernie's talking about is not complete and you don't get 100 liberal democrats added to the house of repetitives. if paul ryan is the speaker of the house what are the real possibilities for legislative outcome. >> if bernie sanders is the president of the united states paul ryan is not going to be the speaker of the house. i will accept the premise of your question. bernie sanders for 25 years has been in an effective member of congress, in the house and senate. what bernie sanders i'm sure will do as president and not just as a single member of the house or senate, bu

nafta. now you look at kasich, i don't think he knows -- you see him, he has a news conference all the time when he's eating. i have never seen a human being eat in such disgusting fashion. i'm saying, and i always with my kids, always say small little bites. this guy takes a pancake an d he's shoving it in his mouth. do you want that for your president? i don't think so. honestly, it's disgusting. and then one of the things he said. they make a deal. politicians, they're no good for deals. so they make a deal at 11:30 last night. the deal is done and this morning, i talk to kasich and he goes, i'm going to indiana. we're leading in indiana and tremendous support in indiana. same thing happened, by the way. jobs are being sucked out of there by mexico and moving to mexico and other places. china is taking our business but i look at it and i see kasich. you know what he approved? nafta. he was one of the big pushes of nafta which destroyed new england, destroyed rhode island, and destroyed bi

like will make nafta look baby stuff. we cannot let it get approved. and ted cruz does not want to do anything about china's manipulation of their currency. he had the opportunity. he blew it. here's a senator who has done the united states senate. no legislation. nothing important. he is been a bad senator. is not get along with anybody. has practically no endorsements. the man who respects most is senator jeff sessions from alabama. a great man in a great senator. there is only one problem. jeff sessions two weeks ago endorsed donald trump. problem. "cheers and applause" donald trump: so we're going to unify the party. when i came down the escalator, i looked down at trump tower and i saw the largest group of cameras and paparazzi and reporters. it looked literally like the academy awards. not love doingid this. i mean, i am doing this because, honestly, we really can not only make a great again but we can make america great are they in ever before i would not be doing this. i would not be doing this. and i stood up and i made a speech and as you kno

it is going to make nafta look like peanuts. what they are doing to us with those documedocuments and cruz insisted we cannot talk about money manipulation. he fought currency devaluation is that is the single biggest tool other countries have for taking our businesses and money and jobs. we cannot let it go ong any longer. they are controlled by their pacs and there people that put up their contributions. the lobbyist in washington have signs on their forehead "i take care of cruz ". i take care of kasich or hillary. take care of hillary. we cannot let it happen anymore. it is time. you know obama used to say time for change. it is time for change. but real change this time. not that change. real change. obama yesterday, president obama yesterday started having reservations about the iran deal for the first time. i could have told them six months ago, nine months ago, long before it was signed. the ink isn't even dry and he is finally starting to understand it was a big beautiful mistake and it is only going to get worse. by th

and who in new york would vote for the other guy, who is in favor of the nafta? so you can't -- i'm sorry, folks. you have only got trump! >> all right. so senior -- our senior national correspondent john roberts is in staten island. we'll get to him. first up this afternoon is elizabeth brand. >> hi arthel. we have a different story for you on the other side of the country. we're talking about george clooney and the each he hosted with hillary clinton. a seat at the v.i.p. table with the actor, his wife and the presidential candidate set guests back more than $535,000. just attending the event $30,000 on friday night. the next morning the actor says he agrees with vermont senator bernie sanders saying that amount of money being spent is obscene. clooney went on to say he would do the same for sanders if he were to win the nomination. take a listen. >> i really like bernie. i think what he is saying in this election is important if you are a democrat, again, to have these conversations. i hope he stays in for the entire election. and if he were to win the nominat

nafta. you look at john kasich, i don't think he knows. did you see him? he has the news conference all the time when he's eating. i have never seen a human being eat in such a disgusting fashion. i always do it with my kids and id s i would say, children, small little bites. this guy takes a pancake and he shoves it in his mouth. it is disgusting. did you want that for your president? i don't think. they make the deal and the deal is done. we are leaving indiana and it is a great place and the same thing happens. jobs are being sucked out of there by mexico and they're all moving to mexico and other places. china is taking our business. i look at it and i see, kasich, you know what he approved? nafta. he was one of the biggest pushers that destroyed new england and new island and big sections of our country. nafta was a disaster and now he wants partnership which is a group of countries that are going to do a number of our country like you never seen before. you cannot let it happen. cruz d

nafta, nafta had a huge negative impact on this area and all over the country, but nafta, you look atew england, what happens in new england? you look at upstate new york where i just won, and i won it because they know that i'm bringing back the jobs. i'll be bringing back the jobs. mexico, china, japan, vietnam, india -- any country you name, throw up any name, they're taking advantage -- lou: we're going to have to take a hard break right here. we'll be going back to harrisburg and donald trump. trump focusing, as you can tell, strongly and returning to his strong messages about jobs and the creation of those jobs and the impact of so-called free trade agreements that have been very costly indeed. nothing free about them at all for the middle class in this poor mouth breather. allergies? stuffy nose? can't sleep? take that. a breathe right nasal strip instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than allergy medicine alone. shut your mouth and say goodnight, mouthbreathers. breathe right. when you didn't know we had hundreds of thousands of places to stay all over the world. or that we

nafta, nafta had a huge negative impact on this area and all over the country, but nafta, you look atew england, what happens in new england? you look at upstate new york where i just won, and i won it because they know that i'm bringing back the jobs. i'll be bringing back the jobs. mexico, china, japan, vietnam, india -- any country you name, throw up any name, they're taking advantage -- lou: we're going to have to take a hard break right here. we'll be going back to harrisburg and donald trump. trump focusing, as you can tell, strongly and returning to his strong messages about jobs and the creation of those jobs and the impact of so-called free trade agreements that have been very costly indeed. nothing free about them at all for the middle class in this country. >>> up next, much more on the trump campaign. audi pilotless vehicles have conquered highways, mountains, and racetracks. and now much of that same advanced technology is found in the new audi a4. with one notable difference... the all-new audi a4, with available traffic jam assist. a dry mouth can be a common side effec

you approve ttp, and as you know, kasich, he approved nafta. you know what nafta did to your area. what? they're all controlled by special interests, they're all controlled by the money they get to run against me. i'm running, i'm using my own money. i took my plane, i come up here, i'm paying for it. [ cheers and applause ] >> and when people come and they say, well, you have to do this, they were a big contributor. who knows that world better than i do? nobody. i've been a politician for nine months, but who knows the other side better than me? and they have lobbyists, they have special interests who have total control over cruz, have total control over hillary, i-yi-yi, hillary. i watched her last night at the debate. we probably have some sanders fans. do we have any? no? because you're pretty close to his territory. you're pretty close. i tell you, i'm not a fan, but i will tell you this. we have one thing in common. he knows our country is being ripped off in trade. the difference is i really know our country is being ripped off and badly, but i'm going to turn it around and

nafta, chinese currency manipulation, product dumping.rly 40%, and i will stop because i don't want to depress closed nearly 40% of the jobs have happened in 2001. new york state has lost three out of four of this manufacturing jobs since the 1960's. three out of four. here is what is happening. we are making horrible deals, we have people that don't know what they're doing. companies moving to mexico and else.here we have not, a clinton deal -- bill clinton was married to crooked hillary clinton -- you know that. that is a total disaster. a disaster.en now, we have a new one coming up, the transpacific partnership. it will make nafta look like peanuts. lyin ted cruz, one of the great writers of all-time. mp? are you doing with tru great. tomorrow, we will show ted cruz, who hates new york -- when you look at the debate, and see the way he talks about us and new downvalues, he turned money -- we had lots of money coming into new york, he voted against no new yorker can vote for ted cruz or john kasich -- nafta.d in favor of ,ith all that

also today sean park of the co- founder of nafta and the first facebook president who is launching asan francisco-based institute to fight cancer. >>pam moore:. national new ways to capture video and new ways to share. >>gabe slate: it is defeated unless people send real-time streaming live video feed from the phone to the facebook friends facebook says is taken off of it are using in creative ways now you can have the ability to train the to facebook live runs and a device for example they think this to the next consumer trend they want you to build to click on the pictures or video and 20 from to change them. the one and one to use in this statement tonight or want to talk about this but big board for riyadh and had sent bush a to social media donald trump is coming to the bay area details of his first campaign stop that is next five starting plus a close call for a neighbor were shot on patrol passing which nation goes to shipment not once but twice. ♪ ♪ (laughing) there's nothing like making their day. except making sure their tomorrow is taken care of too. financial guidance whi

you think he's railing against nafta. nafta is an agreement the united states made.esident come in and rip it up? >> there are things the president can do. all of these agreements, you could back out the way they're structured. ideally one wouldn't want to do that necessarily. i think what trump is hoping to do is put pressure on trading partners to get concessions and to change -- >> his argument is essentially i'm a great negotiator. i'm going to get a better deal than we've asked. an issue ad for donald trump playing in indiana. >> that trade deal supported by ted cruz has hurt indiana. cruz voted for obama's job killing trade deal and voted to expand visas for foreigners by 500%. >> back in the 1920s we practiced not only america first in terms of foreign policy but really american protectionism in terms of trade. is that where donald trump is -- you're listening to him wants to take us again? >> there's an important distinction. back then we were the big mercantilist power. we're running big deficits. in the 1930s brittain put in place policies that forced the u

nafta gaffe to there are more than 3000 two hundred multilateral trade agreements worldwide free tradents. but what results to the yield?

you approve tpp and as you know, kasich, he approved nafta. you know what nafta did to your area? it's a disaster, okay you? don't want these guys, folks. you know what? they're all controlled by special interests, controlled by the money that they get to run against me. i'm running, i'm using my own money. i took my plane, i come up here, i'm paying for it. [cheers and applause] >> and when people come and say well, you have to do this, they were a big contributor. who knows that world better than i do? nobody. i've been a politician now for nine months. who knows the other side better than me, and they have lobbyists and they have special interests, have total control over cruz, total control over hillary, she's terrible. i watched her last night in a debate. we probably have sanders fans, right? do we have any? that's okay. no? because you're pretty close to his territory. you're pretty close. you know i'll tell you i'm not a fan, i'll tell you this, we have one thing in common. he knows our country is ripped off in trade. the difference is i really know our country is ripped o

her husband signed nafta, which destroyed this country economically. you look at new york state and all over new england and pennsylvania, nafta was a disaster. her husband signed it. it was a disaster for this country. hillary will be horrible, absolutely horrible on economic development. she will be terrible on jobs. she knows nothing about jobs, except for jobs for herself. when it came to answering the phone at 3:00 in the morning, she was sleeping. she wasn't with benghazi and all of the other problems. you look at what she did with syria. you look at what she has done in so many different ways. she will not be a good president. she doesn't have the strength. she doesn't have the stamina. i know about dealing with china. i've made billions of dollars dealing with china. china can be dealt with and you can get along with them. hillary does not have the strength or the stamina to deal with china or other things. bottom line is, one of the big problems our country has is problems with trade, where you have china, japan, mexico, so many countries, jus

kasich was in favor of nafta. nafta has killed connecticut. it has killed hartford. it has killed big parts of our country. you cannot have people and you cannot vote for people who voted in favor of nafta. it is no good. it is no good. so, i started off with illegal immigration and trade. let me tell you -- let's talk trade because connecticut more than anything else. boy, do you need jobs. we need jobs. we are going to bring jobs back in. we are not going to be the dummies that lose all of our jobs. we are going to be the smart ones. there is one of the dummies. get him out of here. get him out. there is nothing more fun than a trump rally. nothing. get him out. all right. all right. look. do we love our country? [cheering] are we going to take our country back? are we not going to be this stupid people anymore? we are led by people who are grossly incompetent. they don't know what they are doing. militarily, we cannot beat isis. we have people that have no clue. that is going to end, folks, it is going to end. it is going to end right after this election. it is go

she has supported virtually every disastrous trade agreement, from nafta to permanent normal trade relationshina. agreements that have cost us millions of decent paying jobs. if corporations shut down here and throw american workers out on the street and moved to china and other low-wage countries. [crowd boos] i not only oppose these trade agreements, i lead the opposition to all of them. [cheers and applause] and if elected president, we are going to transform our trade policy. corporate america will start investing in this country, not just in china. [cheers and applause] secretary clinton and i disagree on minimum wage policy. the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour is a starvation wage. [cheers and applause] she believes we should raise the minimum wage to $12 per hour. not bad, but not good enough. we need to raise it to 15 box 15 bucks an hour. [cheers and applause] i am proud of the fast food workers who went out on strike. who had the guts -- and i've been on the picket line with them -- [cheers and applause] who had the guts to tell you american people that if you are worth 40 h

like will make nafta look baby stuff. we cannot let it get approved.nd ted cruz does not want to do anything about china's manipulation of their currency. he had the opportunity. he blew it. here's a senator who has done the united states senate. no legislation. nothing important. he is been a bad senat

john kasich, who voted for nafta, is in favor for it.ple who said, "you are going to vote for that deal, see you are going to vote for this" tell him he has no choice, so he is going to vote for it. there are people in congress who don't want it. those are people who are being honest. the biggest point of the deal is devaluing monetary policy. china takes the most advantage of the devaluing of currency. they kill us. this year, we are going to have a $500 billion trade deficit with china. many people say that you're going to be so rich, so fast, but i'm a businessman, i know business, and under me, you are going to be so rich, so fast. [applause] mr. trump: you just don't know how rich you are going to be. we are going from a debtor nation. you have ted cruz who refused to approve any language on devaluation. any language on monetary manipulation. that is where they beat us, folks. they devalued their currency so much, and that we see our dollar holding and going up. they want our dollar to go up. it sounds good. in the meantime, komatsu

remember this, john kasich, voted in favor of nafta. he's a believer in nafta. nafta destroyed new york state, new england, so many different places -- we lost our jobs to mexico. >> joining us now is ed rollins who's the deputy chief of staff and along with a being a fox news political analyst. >> thank you, nice to be with you. >> welcome. >> sending the message that he's not a lover of the state. >> new york is the trump invitational. there is nobody playing here. john kasich is running around but he's not going to do very much and cruz is gone off to wyoming. he's going to have a big week. he may win all 92 or the overwhelming majority. if he keep that is 50%, he will do very well. it sets him up well. he still has a shot by getting the majority of the delegates. he's got to do well in california, he has no operation there yet. he hired a guy last week to run his race there. cruz has a strong operation there. >> we still have to see. >> are we seeing it with donald trump and the way he was speaking out the other night at the new york gala and trying to be mo

. >> very few americans, perhaps including obama, this is not like nafta.gine if nafta meant there was total free movement of people right throughout the americas, there would be uproar, wouldn't there? >> we're back with our panel to talk about the president's remarks, his press conference today. charles we'll start with you, the whole notion of whether britain stays as part of the european union. you know some folks feel it's controversial. that the president would go to a foreign country and weigh in on what's a big decision for them. he did say this is up to them to make this decision. but he did express his opinion. >> it's slightly condescending to say to the people who invented democracy, that whether they stay in europe or not is their decision. that's pretty obvious. you don't have to come on a state visit to announce that, what is not obvious is why he intervened here. i think it's going to hurt cameron. this is a payback. when cameron came here during the debate over the iran deal -- scale and importance to the british. i think he made a huge gaf

switching from supporting nafta to not supporting it now. you are going to see the same dynamic in a general election. >> are you now convinced that donald trump will get to 1247 before the convention? >> no, i'm not. you knew this was going to be a rough two weeks. that said, i do think he overperformed in new york in these five contests more than people expected. it is causing a lot of worry. i think team cruz recognizes this. he is raising the stakes in indiana saying this is the battleground. he has to perform there well. he has to turn it into the western states and compete and have a shot in california blunting trump from being able to get to 1237. this is high stakes we are going into. this should be the pinnacle of donald trump's campaign. he should be able to seal the deal in the next coming weeks. what we are going into is a test of whether the republican party does want a trump alternative at the convention or they are just going to suck it up and go along with it. >> so what do you make of the senator sanders statement that came

a lot of mexicans feel very uneasy about what nafta, the north american free trade agreement meant for mexico feeling that it has made mexican companies compete against large er better funded companies that cost not only the united states but mexico a lot of jobs but i was expecting to hear probably a little bit more about the wall and how he would finance it. i didn't hear anything like that today, wolf. >> very interesting. what was said was critically important and outlining his strategy and what also was not said may be significant as well. rafael, stand by. everyone stand by. the former nato supreme ally commander retired u.s. james revis will be joining us with some strong views on what we just heard from the republican presidential front-runner. let's take a quick break. much more of our special coverage right after this. you both have a perfect driving record. >>perfect. no tickets. no accidents... >>that is until one of you clips a food truck, ruining your perfect record. >>yup... now, you would think your insurance company would cut you some slack, right? >>no. your insurance

. >> very few americans, perhaps including obama, this is not like nafta.nafta meant there was total free movement of people right throughout the americas, there would be uproar, wouldn't there? >> we're back with our panel to talk about the president's remarks, his press conference today. charles we'll start with you, the whole notion of whether britain stays as part of the european union. you know some folks feel it's controversial. that the president would go to a foreign country and weigh in on what's a big decision for them. he did say this is up to them to make this decision. but he did express his opinion. >> it's slightly condescending to say to the people who invented democracy, that whether they stay in europe or not is their decision. that's pretty obvious. you don't have to come on a state visit to announce that, what is not obvious is why he intervened here. i think it's going to hurt cameron. this is a payback. when cameron came here during the debate over the iran deal -- scale and importance to the british. i think he made a huge gaffe when

distraction reminds people that bill clinton is a moderate corporatist for the death penalty, for naftaform, hillary clinton has supported all of those policies. and to the extent that bill clinton and people remember those issues and reminded of those issues people need to remember those are the policies that hillary clinton has supported, bad trade agreements that destroyed jobs, the death penalty. they were both against marriage equality, all of those issues get even more hyped up if you will when bill clinton comes out on the campaign trail. >> i do hope you dguys grab tha drink. >> i'm going to invite him to the inaugural for hillary clinton when she becomes president. >> whoa. now those are fighting words. all right. thanks so much. really appreciate it. >>> bernie sanders and hillary clinton by the way, will be jake tapper's guest on "state of the union." watch it tomorrow morning at 9:00 eastern. >>> i want to give you our first look at the results rolling in from today's wyoming democratic caucuses. when cnn is ready for a prediction i'll have that. this is what we have as of n

yorker can vote for ted cruz, and no new yorker can vote for kasich when he was one that approved nafta. he voted in favor of nafta, which has been a disaster for your state and for this country. >> let's begin our coverage of the new york primary, shall we, with cnn's jim acosta, who was at a trump rally tonight. hello, mr. acosta. zru donald trump looking strong coming into the new york vote. could this race -- could he put this race away with a big win tomorrow? >> well, i think that would be a little too optimistic for donald trump at this point. i think what they're hoping for is to really run the table in new york. they want to run up the score on ted cruz and he does have the potential to really run a clean sweep. i mean if he gets more than 50% statewide, more than 50% in these individual congressional districts, he could sweep up all 95 delegates in new york state. that would put him well on the path to securing the nomination, to that magic number of 1,237. it won't get him there obviously, but the terrain is pretty friendly after new york. in just another week from tomorrow,

he was in favor of nafta. do you remember that? kasich.sich. 0-32 ow -- he is now, except he won his state. he's like 1-33. and he's just -- he won't leave. and that's ok. you know what, he's a nice guy. let him keep going. it's ok. it's all right. it's ok. but both of them and this is so serious, both of them, we have a deal under negotiation being negotiated by president obama which you immediately know it's got to be a bad deal. audience: boo! a bad deal. don't forget obama negotiated the iran deal, one of the worst deals ever, ever, ever negotiated. so what we have -- thank you, darling. "i e -- screaming "love," love you trump", "i love you trump." i love you. i love you. i do. so both of them want t.p.p. which is trans pacific partnership. it is a disastrous deal. it's going to suck the blood out of new york. it's going to suck the blood out of our country. both of them want it to happen. i'm going to fight it. i'm going to stop it. i'm not going to let it happen. we have enough bad deals. this deal would be catastrophic. so look, le

her husband signed nafta which destroyed to this country economically. england, pennsylvania, nafta was a disaster. her husband signed it. it was a disaster for the country. hillary will be horrible, absolutely horrible on economic development. she will be terrible on jobs. she does nothing about jobs except jobs for herself. [applause] when it came to answering the phone at 3:00 in the morning, she was sleeping. she wasn't with benghazi. look at syria, so many other things. she will not be a good president. she doesn't have the strength, the stamina. i know about dealing with china. i've made billions of dollars dealing with china. china can be dealt with and you can get along with them. hillary does not have the strength or the stamina to deal with china or other things. put bottom line, one of the big problems our country has his problems with trade. china, japan, mexico -- so many countries ripping us left and right. the politicians cannot handle the problem. they don't have the competence to do it. most of them are paid off through campaign contribu

ttp that's worse than nafta and everything these crumbs have done in the past. they have to go. we have to get rid of nafta, the ttp takes your right away to negotiate. that's so bad. >>> mr. vodvarka i'll have interrupt you. you'll have opportunity to continue that train of thought. >>> mr. sestak how are you new and different? >> reporter: i'm different i'm not a politician i am a public servant, the proof of that is when i want down to the washington, d.c. to see the leadership of the democratic party, one senator said sestak whenever i tell you something the answer is yes. half of the democrat is against me. trust is the biggest deficit we have in america today. they know the system is broken. when i left being a congress i turned down 6, 7 figure lobbying job. i walked across the state 122 miles so people would know that i walked in their shoes not the establishment's shoes. when the philadelphia inquirer endorsed me, they said this is someone who puts principle above party and bring integrity of service in people. i did it in the military and as a congress and teaching wor

and also he's really trying to critique hillary clinton on her past support, her trade agreements, nafta and the asia pacific partnership that she supported as secretary of state and is now against. so i think this is certainly something that they are feeling very confident about, but the question is, what is the margin going to be. because these delegates are awarded proportionately. polls show them neck and neck. >> after wisconsin there's new york. clinton started downplaying expectations in new york over the last couple of days. are they worried, and is sanders confident he can pull off a win there? >> i think you are seeing her concentrate so much on new york because this is key for her to win her adopted home state. she was a senator there. people know her there. they took a chance on her in 2001 when first lady and running for the senate. i think they do think the race favors her, but they're also trying to prepare for anything. that's why you see them trying to shore up some of that support for her. that's why she is there today. she's in upstate new york, which is an area that c

like will make nafta look baby stuff. we cannot let it get approved. cruz does not want to do anything about china's manipulation of their currency. he had the opportunity. he blew it. here's a senator who has done the united states senate. no legislation. nothing important. he is been a bad senator. is not get along with anybody. has practically no endorsements. the man who respects most is senator jeff sessions from alabama. a great man in a great senator. there is only one problem. jeff sessions two weeks ago endorsed donald trump. problem. "cheers and applause" donald trump: so we're going to unify the party. when i came down the escalator, i looked down at trump tower and i saw the largest group of cameras and paparazzi and reporters. it looked literally like the academy awards. not love doingid this. i mean, i am doing this because, honestly, we really can not only make a great again but we can make america great are they in ever before i would not be doing this. i would not be doing this. and i stood up and i made a speech and as you know i brou

he was one of thg pushes of nafta. it destroyed new england. destroyed rhode island. disaster. now he wants transpacific hardener ship. a gup that you have never see before. you cannot let ihappen. ted cruz does not want to stop china from dave evaluatingts cancer and -- it's current state. using it to huhe united states and companies. ifou wt to let people go ahead and be valued and u want to leteople go ay, he e is bad for this cntry. hes bad for jobs in business. all right. bad. watch ted cr this mning. he is losing so badly. he is ke a basket case. he is stutteri. i want jobs. i want the enomy. i want t this and i want that. he just started sayi it. he doenot know anything about the economy he does not know anythg abt jobs. nothing past. all he is is that a y that will go down and sta a fibuster for a day or two. the guy a painn the [bleep] you know-- neil: dald trump also saying, governor kasichas had rob lumps. 1438. 1441. he found a wea st. you will see h thatoes. 1 a to see how we would be responng tohis. the two remaining esidential opponents. where there iso

and i will tell you one thing about kasich, he voted in favor of nafta.s in favor, which is a disaster. that sucked, that sucked the businesses from wisconsin and every place else. you have to see new england. just took 'em away. he voted in favor, and what he wants now is tpp, trans-pacific partnership. a total disaster for our country. led by the special interests, led by the lobbies, led by countries that want to rip us off and take our jobs, led by people -- this is going to make nafta look like a baby, folks, and you shouldn't allow it. ted cruz wants it. ted cruz wants it badly because his people that give him money are telling him we want it. and it's a bad thing for our country, believe me, folks, a really bad thing. [cheers and applause] i love wisconsin. [cheers and applause] i love wisconsin. you know, it's funny, we had a situation where cruz was going to win the south, remember? until be i came along. [laughter] but he was going to win the south, and he was actually -- they were thinking new hampshire, but somebody else was supposed to win ne

. >> nafta. >> nafta. >> corrupt campaign finance system. >> bought and sold by their special interestrican people have a right to be angry. >> we've had it. we've now had it. >> as those clips show, one thing that the outside candidates, trump and sanders, agree about is anger about the economy and the rich getting richer. but who's to blame? is it president obama, outer fablgts that during his term the republican-controlled congress has been stymieing any legislation that would help the working class. joining me is the former chair of president obama's council of economic advisers who is now a professor at the university of chicago's booth school of business. professor, are they strange bedfellows? are there commonalties between that which trump and sanders are offering in terms of economic proposals? >> it's kind of an interesting point. i think there are certain parallels, but they are definitely strange bedfellows. >> in what regard? >> well, in the regard that i don't think they like each other at all. i think if you asked the two candidates, if you asked sanders, what do you thi