president levits: we have nato military personnel from 10 other nations. 10 other nato nations here. and we have several thousand from others, nato member states, and we have also of course our own military forces. so that's for the moment it is enough. but because of a change of the strategic situation in europe, we need more troops and we need to strengthen all eastern flank of nato and of course latvia is part of the eastern flank. and we will prepare our proposals so that we have more emphasis to defend fence, and -- defense, and of course for the employment of -- deployment of nato troops in our region. baltic region, but in general in the eastern part of europe. missy: it's interesting to see nato's leadership make these decisions following president putin's invasion of ukraine that many countries in eastern europe have been calling for years. we know the baltic nations have warn the west for a really long time about the threat of russia and the need to provide a stronger deterrence, posture in eastern europe. do you think leaders in western europe, in other parts of the trans-

levits: we have nato military personnel from 10 other nations, 10 other nato nations here, and several from other nato states, and our own military forces. for the moment, it is enough. but because of the change of the strategic situation in europe, we need more troops. and we need to strengthen the eastern flank of nato. and of course, that mia is part of the eastern flank, and we will prepare our proposals so that we have more emphasis to defend, the common defense, and for the deployment of nato troops in our baltic region and in general, eastern part of europe. missy: it is interesting to see nato leadership make these decisions following president putin's invasion of ukraine, that many countries in eastern europe have in calling for four years. we know baltic nations have warned the west for a long time about the threat of russia and the need to provide a stronger deterrent posture in eastern europe. do you think leaders in western europe and other parts of the transatlantic alliance failed to heed that morning or didn't believe the severity of the russian threat? pres. levits: ce

missy: i definitely want to ask you a little bit about nato nations' military aid to ukraine in a few moments. today, you talked about your own sense security vis-a-vis the nato mutual defense guarantee. can you talk about the mood among the people in latvia? how concerned are they? how does the country's specific history with russia play into public sentiment? president levits: we are concerned, like every european, on ukraine because we are -- we see that there is an unprovoked, unjustified war against a democratic state. us a democratic state like the united states, like the netherlands, like spain are worried on that. so concerning our specific history, we know russians. we have 50 years of occupation of -- from russia. we are not naive. we know the intentions of russia, of putin's russia. and i would say this is our advantage. we know our neighbors. but concerning security, we have the same security as all other member states of nato. this is the sense of nato's union. missy: there have been repeated warnings in recent days to russia against using chemical or biological weapons i

it also telegraphs and i non-nato nations. it also telegraphs and i wonder— non-nato nations.phs and i wonder what you think - non-nato nations. it also telegraphs and i wonder what you think about i and i wonder what you think about this, it also telegraphs, asjoe biden did, before it started, that they were not going to get involved. that is right. we have told mr putin. — that is right. we have told mr putin, overand that is right. we have told mr putin, over and over, almost every senior— putin, over and over, almost every senior speech by both nato and us leaders _ senior speech by both nato and us leaders across the last three weeks or so, _ leaders across the last three weeks or so, within the first two or three senses, _ or so, within the first two or three senses, they— or so, within the first two or three senses, they always say the same thing. _ senses, they always say the same thing, we are not going to fight russia — thing, we are not going to fight russia and —— in ukraine. ithink thing, we are not going to fight russia and —— in ukraine. i think mr putin— russia

president levits: we have nato military personnel from 10 other nations. 10 other nato nations here. and we have several thousand from others, nato member states, and we have also of course our own military forces. so that's for the moment it is enough. but because of a change of the strategic situation in europe, we need more troops and we need to strengthen all eastern flank of nato and of course latvia is part of the eastern flank. and we will prepare our proposals so that we have more emphasis to defend fence, and --

this as he's trying to bolster confidence and show of force in unity among nato nations. nato itself to bolster ukraine's defense even nuclear weapons. the russian foreign minister warning about sending peacekeepers into ukraine and that will lead to a confrontation of the western powers do not want. the kremlin itself is still not ruling out the use of nuclear weapons. that has the president of the united states quite concerned to put it mildly. that maybe we need more troops among nato nations and specifically more american troops on nato nations that border the ukraine. we'll be explaining this momentarily with the prime minister of slovenia who will be there in brussels with the president of the united states. he has visited with the leader of the czech republic and poland. no indications that the president of the united states is planning a trip, but anything is possible. his read on what is at stake for this important gathering of nato and western nation leaders in a moment. in the meantime, let's get the read from mark meredith at the pentagon. we're going to go to

doing what the british labor policy want him to do would amount to be being as bad as russia, with nato nations and the u. condemning. russian president vladimir putin for authorizing what russia calls a special military operation against the graeme after antony blinkin canceled his meeting with russian and minister counterpart survey leverage nation media is talking about the whole new era and geopolitics. let alone nuclear weapon use here are naughty and had going underground. we seek to question more, as well as provide viewers with all sides of any debate. we have been reaching out to pro ukrainians to hear their side of the ukraine invasion bridge in the current climate. many do not want to come on to talk to us. we like therefore, to extend an invite to any ukranian journalists or politicians watching now to come on the show and give your side of the story. but joining me now from moscow in natalia nourish at sky, the former vice chairman of international as committee in the russian duma. thanks so much italia for coming on. not sure how much a british media you're watching. i know you're

nato nation.er article 5, as you know, an attack on one is an attack on all, that would put a lot of pressure on nato to respond in a far more decisive way than they have done as yet. >> you look at map, nato country versus not nato, worth pointing out. ukraine not part of that alliance even though there have been greater training since then, thank you. >> for more. let's bring in our panel. matthew shoemaker, a former defense intelligence agency officer, captain robert wells. miranda divine. a "new york post" columnist. let's get first to this question of where russia goes from here. three weeks in, they appear stalled in certain places, making progress in the south. i'll start with you, matthew, when you look at where russia has moved to this point. where does that go from here? and they have overwhelming capacity here. is is going to reach a point that russia begins to get it together and show that capacity? >> sure. thank you very much. it seems like president putin's goals have not changed, t

i agree multi-dove have a is not a nato nation. >> no. ey are partners. >> jesse: not a united states toe nation. >> certainly there is a delineation between the two. if he is willing to talk about nuclear weapons being on the table and he is got mobilization option or he could consider tack nukes, well i think nato would be in play. i'm not convinced now that vladimir putin is trying to avoid a global conflict or world war iii. what i do know is that i think militarily, it's wise to consider stopping this here in the ukraine and not allowing for it to grow. and i do believe it will grow. >> jesse: you believe it will grow but we don't have any evidence that it will grow beyond ukraine's borders yet. >> once they start moving on a nato nation, then i think that's something that reconsider. but until then to start that kind of aggressive action in europe, in eastern europe, in a country that used to be russia, seems like a massive escalation for a country the united states sits in the atlantic ocean a long way. you don't think that's a majo

singer, missiles and so on being sent off to the referendum that obviously was not accepted by nato nations in crimea, recognizing the crimea was brought to russia, but what we wanted to do in crimea was work with the government of ukraine, which was not in a position to engage in any military activity in crimea after it was an ex, but through no diplomatic measures to get the russians to reverse, this is something that we said in 1945 was never going to happen in europe again, which is international borders being changed by military force. and yet that's exactly what russia did. it did it in ukraine. it didn't crimea rather did it, don bass and it's doing it again. now. i mean, the, to many cases, grenada, of filing, the so many cases of all global invasion. i'm going to write it down by the association of caribbean states because of a cuba and russian supported coo and grenade. which, of course is what it, what the other, i mean, there's so many parallels here. and these are the ones being argued across the global. so what about this phrase of peacekeepers? can you understand? i mean, obv

nato nation countries in european union leaders to accept any reproach mall as this crisis, like all other crises, solely fates. i think too, it expects western resolve, particularly european resolves, fail sooner rather than later. and to restore something approaching normality in economic relations and ultimately not pay nearly the price that people today in the west are speaking. are that that i think is his expectation. do you think blinkin and sullivan will accept any kind of reproachful? sure, they won't investable. thank you. thanks from thanks for adam. and that's it for the show will be back on monday. the deadline for 12 russian diplomats to leave the u. n. a new york, after they were expelled by the united states, which accused them of spying. until then keep in touch my role as social media. if it's available in your country and use a vpn or r t dot com, if you are a media restricted europe and that us know what you think of censorship in nato nations. ah ah ah, there is a storm for a show or need to get involved in this conflict in the more active great. something more t

turkey is a nato nation. what is that level of acceptance and what is that level of -- that was a mistake. that wasn't necessarily an outright attack on a nato nation or a country. those troops, those reinforcements, the logistics command and control, those are all necessary for command and controlling our troops. when you heard about aerial refuelers, can refuel any they toe fighter jet or bomber. so it's -- this is serious business right now. i'm sure the administration is working very hard to get all of the diplomacy, the information warfare, military, economic, trying to pull all of those levers to get a loft landing here. >> martha: a soft landing would be nice. i think you hit the nail on the head, gen raleigh. the question is what do -- what does nato perceive as crossing a line on an attack as a nato country or entity and the other side what does putin perceive as nato attacking one of -- any part of his military. because really he could choose to see many of these actions that are taking place, even

let's not confuse nato nations with nato. as of now, nato nations like the u.s. that have put economic sanctions and help with military aid. nato as an organization has done basically nothing. >> nato has done a great deal. it has done it for nato allies within the alliance to reinforce the defense capacity for the countries in nato. in terms of helping ukraine, you are right. most assistance is going through individual nato member states. that could be ia key for the president's visit. get nato more engaged within limits with the security of ukraine per se. >> let's hope something concrete around ukraine comes out of this, ian and the energy sanctions could be one heck of a headline for the global economy. ian lesser, thank you. >>> coming up, our conversation with thomas tull with the uncertainty on the markets and inflation and how he is navigating it all. >>> as we head to break, other headlines happening now. walmart is suing bj whole sale club accusing it of stealing technology walmart and sam's club claim that bj's launched a self checkout in the mobile app

nato nation countries in european union leaders to accept any reproach mall as this crisis, like all other crises, solely fates. i think too, it expects western resolve, particularly european resolved fail sooner rather than later and to restore something approaching normality and economic relations and ultimately not pay nearly the price that people today in the west are speaking. are that that i think is his expectation. but you think blinkin linda sullivan will accept any kind of reproachful? sure, they will. investable. thank you. thanks from thanks for adam. and that's it for the show will be back on monday. the deadline for 12 russian diplomats to leave the u. n. a new york, after they were expelled by the united states, which accused them of spying. until then keep in touch my role as social media. if it's available in your country and use a vpn or auto dot com, if you are in media restricted europe and let us know what you think of censorship in nato nations. ah, there is a storm for a show or need to, to get involved or in this conflict in a more actively post something more

nations. you will feel at that point that you could have prevented it. yes, i know that nato countries are defending themselves. but here we are talking about the whole nation being turned into aleppo in the central -- center of europe and that is what is going to happen. if you are not going to respond, we are asking for planes. the government's that are to take this decision are not taking this decision. ok, we are here, we are fighting. so, provide us everything that will make us strong. you know russia is afraid of the language of strength, capability, unity, and access. we are here to do that so reinforces. -- so reinforce us and do not dwell on decisions. i know that it already takes five days for ukrainians to set for the u.s. -- send for the u.s. for additional body armor, additional helmets, night vision goggles and such equipment the cause these are dual use products and the u.s. authorities of customs are not giving the permission to lift the pure product procedures for this particular moment. this is about our survival and this is what we are asking for from you.

if he takes over ukraine, what is to stop him from going into a nato nation except another promise from a nation which says you can't commit war crimes but then lets him commit war crimes? >> that's a great, hard question and i don't have a clear answer but i would say two thingso th one, he may some time occupy all of ukraine, including lviv he made it clear that's his goal by the way, we should listen to what he says a little more clearly and stop pretending he's some rational actor we can do some cost benefit analysis and stop him some of the absurd conversation we had before this war, people should be held accountable for the kinds of arguments they were making about putin when he said very clearly, de-nazification and destruction of the military. de-nazification is a code ward for regime change, for killing president zelenskyy and everybody who led the revolution of dignity in 2014 that's what he aims to do. even if he does that, however, and he lets -- god forbid he does it but even if we think through that scenario, he will not be able to hold ukraine. he does not have the milita

putin intends to directly threaten a nato nation. he gets the mention, if he does, we'll all come to each other's defense. >> secretary of state antony blinken reiterated the biden administration's opposing a no-fly zone over ukraine and said it could likely draw u.s. forces into direct conflict with russia and potentially escalate into world war iii. what if a u.s. ally or nato is forced to shoot down a russian jet? might that be the only way to deter putin with force? >> it would be hard to get into a hypothetical right now. that's one reason why we stood up a deconfliction channel with the ministry of defense at european headquarters in germany, to make sure that kind of eventuality doesn't happen so there is a direct wllink. >> can you confirm "wall street journal" story that the russian military, russian government is recruiting a syrian mercenary, syrians to go into ukraine to attack? >> we do have information to corroborate that story, that in fact they are trying to enlist and recruit foreign fight lakers we find note worthy.

is an attack on all nato nations.t time that the article 5 was invoked was september 11th, 2001. and after that we did go to war. so i think he's making it very clear that russia knows and also our allies know, part of nato knows that if they are attacked, then the united states would step in to defend itself and to defend them to whatever ability that they had to do it. >> yeah. i look forward to the whole interview. don will have more of the interview tonight at 10:00 p.m. eastern. only here on cnn. done, it is great to see you. we'll see you soon. back to alisyn and victor. >> thank you very much. we'll check back with you. meanwhile ukrainian armed forces say they blocked russia's advance. so we'll speak to a member of the parliament who has now taken up armed and joined the resistance. -stahp. -i will not. food's here! this smells like a brand-new car! yup. best-in-class rewards, and a great way toward your next chevrolet, buick, gmc or cadillac. and with all those points on everything we buy... ...we're thinking

watching going on the ground, the team, and i will be back soon with a brand new look, despite nato nation and you censorship. but until then, we'll be showing some of your favorite chose a for season so far. i'm after it, nancy, we're going underground on ukraine's day of resistance to occupation of the autonomous republic of crimea in the city of so vast of all this at the end of a week in which british politicians have been seemingly attempting to interfere with the independent regulation of broadcasting by calling on you k, p. m. bars, johnson, to shut down this channel effectively ending press freedom in the u. k. johnson. the former journalist himself claims the doing what the british labor party wanted to do, would amount to be being as bad as russia, with nato nations in the u, condemning. russian president vladimir putin for authorizing what russia calls a special military operation against ukraine after antony blinking cancelled his meeting with russian foreign minister counterpart, sergey lavern of nathan asian media is talking about the whole new era and geo politics. let alone

for north atlantic treaty organization. article 5 of the north atlantic treaty says that if one nato nation is attacked than all will pledge to defend. so if any of the nato countries got involved in any way in conflict, then there would be a war involving all that nato countries. a war. ready that would evolve the u. s, because it's the biggest nato member and russia, and that in any other words, is world war 3. gosh, okay, james, i'll leave you there for now. are waiting to hear from those members of nato. after the meeting and we'll, we'll talk to you again, the antony blinking on the right hand side of your screen. the in stoughton beg next to him meeting and greeting in brussels as the member states of nato plus or to others. i think james said e, you members, finland and sweden. i think it was. we'll be meeting there and we were bring you coverage of that. when that meeting happens. let's talk about the military side of things. we mentioned the convoy with jonah hall, i spoke to pavel feldman, how're as well. he is a defensive military analyst and a columnist with the russian and news

dot com, if you are in media restricted europe and let us know what you think of censorship in nato nations. ah, look forward to talking to you all. that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given it by human beings, except when such orders at conflict with the 1st law show your identification. we should be very careful about artificial intelligence. and the point obviously is too great. i trust i rather than fear for a job with artificial intelligence, real, somebody with a robot must protect its own existence with with all over the place and personal documents i. d, 's, of ukrainian troops, military uniform. so parents, the soldiers here took off these left them here and put all the civilian clothing before mingling with civilians. and a chaotic retreat from their bases during rush is offensive. vast amounts of equipment are left behind by ukrainian service. men also ahead, american top diploma has met his freeney encounter part of poland border. we keep playing with kids envoy pleading for a fighter jets or defense system bottles and done boss continued our t v

. >> all right, if the weapons were used, would you expect a more robust response from the nato nations or u.s.? >> i hope we would. we have seen what a robust response against the use of chemical weapons can be in places like syria and what lack of response with lead to as well. that changes the game. anything on the lines of chemical, biological and nuclear elevates it globaly, what response would be is a lot of things we can to, just a question of whether or not we have the will power and desire to do it it needs to be a in ao alliance decision -- nato alliance decision. jon: there have been votes in congress to provide lethal military aid, 13 billion authorized. how much of that has actually reached the ukrainians yet? to we know? >> i can't say for certain. i would hope that a lot of that information is still fairly closely guarded. we could say there is a lot of money spent and material moved. and that it is moving. but the specifics as far as what is there and how quickly it is moving and where it is moving through, i hope i wouldn't know. then it makes it an easy target for russ

buy like tulip bulbs be my guest, and putin do you think or do you think he will have to go for nato nation countries in european union leaders to accept any reproach mall as this crisis, like all other crises, solely fates. i think too, it expects western resolve, particularly european resolves, fail sooner rather than later and to restore something approaching normality in economic relations and ultimately not pay nearly the price that people today in the west are speaking. are that that i think is his expectation. do you think blinkin and sullivan will accept any kind of reproachful? sure, they won't master bold. thank you. thanks from thanks robin. and that's it for the show will be back on monday. the deadline for 12 russian diplomats to leave the u. n. a new york, after they were expelled by the united states, which accused them of spying. until then keep in touch my role as social media. if it's available in your country and use a vpn or auto dot com, if you are in media restricted europe and let us know what you think of censorship in nato nations. ah, there is a strong brochure or

i think natal has done a tremendous job. 14 nato nations, including germany. how provided very, but military assistance to ukraine. they have moved their forces close right up to the russian border. so if potent dream of, you know, just over running ukraine in a matter of days, what he then decided he wanted to do the baltics as well. we put our forces in there. you've got the uh, polls have take it in hundreds of thousands of ukrainian refugees and i've offered to provide them on aircraft. so i think this has reinvigorated nato. a lot of us and i think the germans included well wondering, you know, what is the future of nato in this post cold war world? what we now know is to prevent russia from trying to reestablish the soviet empire . now the russian military advance is preceding, slower than expected. why do you think that it's well, i think there are 2 reasons. number one, they underestimated the capabilities of the ukrainian military. they thought it was going to be much like it was back in 2014 and know they're very much better. the other is they undere

a whole lot of nato nations nearby. what does deconfliction mean here? >> reporter: in this environment, very difficult to see how this will work. and the pentagon is holding its card about if and when it picks up the phone, dials the hotline number to moscow and raises concerns. what this is about is basic live a telephone number. each side can call each other. the pentagon will not say what circumstances would trigger a phone call. but the idea is there will be a communications link in an emergency to keep u.s. forces and russian forces as far away from each other as possible. with so many u.s. nato aircraft operating right on the eastern flank, right up to the border. and the russian invasion force lobbying missiles, flying jets, dropping bombs. there is concern about any miscalculation that could lead to any kind of confrontation, any escalation between both sides. look, they have one of these in syria, and it's worked fairly well for many years. there have been incidents, but they have managed to steer clear of each other largely. we will have to se

at this nato meeting the president needs to accentuate the nato nations providing military equipment to ukraine. and ask them to do even more. and to do more on the humanitarian front as well. that's the first thing is appreciation for so much they have done and to do more. second is that there has to be continued support in nato for deployments along the eastern flank. the nations of estonia, lithuania, poland. are very nervous about russian aggression and we need to send a clear signal that we are prepared to respond should they engage. a third point is for the nato nations while biden is there to reaccentuate the commitment to article 5. that commitment is if anyone is attacked, everyone responds. and message has to be absolutely clear to putin that if he tries to take one square inch of nato territory, nato will absolutely respond and defend any of the nations that are affected. >> congress has passed a sweeping $1.5 trillion spending bill last week. to fund the u.s. government. including nearly $14 billion in assistance to ukraine. president biden signed it into law. meanwhile s

it's surrounded by nato nations which are under article 5. we know that today president zelensky asked for some -- if not nato participation at least security guarantees that could be agreed upon by nato nations. our thoughts are with you. thanks for speaking out with us today. thank you. i want to bring in a member of the ukrainian parliament. she's here in washington meeting with lawmakers and pushing for more sanctions. she feels strongly about a no-fly zone over ukraine. it's good to have you here. i notice that when you heard those sirens in trey's report, it was very emotional for you. >> i still cannot believe this is happening in my country. every day we have hundreds of people dead. we have children die on the streets in the children's hospital, in orphanages. they're shooting bombs at preschool. it's impossible to imagine. something that was impossible to imagine a week ago. nobody believed this could have happened in the center of europe. the only thing that we keep begging as a country that gave up their nuclear weapons, signed al

s. plans to muster all nato nations under the ages of operation dropshot. ah, in 1949 the, the soviets acquired their own nuclear weapons. so any plan to annihilate the u. s . s. i had to be postponed indefinitely, but the idea remains the same. the united states have to be seen as the only major player in the international arena, or anyone who sold otherwise had to be wiped from the earth. the soviet union itself is no mold. this is a victory for democracy and freedom. these events clearly serve on national interest. george bush was, i'm good. dance of it on you. one anguish v i'm ganache leash took off his zip on and tablet lock on. mine was the one of the dean and he's in london sounds. i'm a saucen man my, the actual f, as in nancy, alana was on because he had to say that i completed true. no. jesus, london, united states became the indispensable country. i worth the exceptional people whose obligation was to lay down the path for all of the countries. and so it became a new and renewed a justification for american aggression in the world. it was the ju

exercises throughout the week and are part of broader military drills nato is conducting across europe right now involving 13 nationsu.s. also announcing tonight it's sending another 500 troops to europe to further shore up nato's defenses. >> clinton watts is tracking russia's military movements for us, a former father military officer and now distinguished foreign research fellow at the foreign policy research institute and nbc news national security analyst clint, the pentagon says russia is still days behind where they thought they would be at this point. did the troop movement show the same and where specifically are russian troops stalling? >> yes, sheppard, really interesting to watch here is the convoy we're talking about completely bogged down and northwest part of kyiv, essentially called irpin, you've seen again russian armor advancing without using infantry and support and the ukrainia army just decimating them with anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons, essentially moving around and hitting the convoy from the rear or blowing up a bridge, these make it impossible for logistics to make it in. separately th

that nato and individual nations will respond to the use of these weapons. >> and david, you wrote a few days ago, the u.s., ukraine and nato have a secret weapon against russia. patience. yet we are seeing ukrainian towns just getting obliterated and hundreds, if not thousands of civilians being killed. so explain how you see the time on the side of the good guys here. >> well, actually, in the course of the article, what i was really doing was reporting back that my conversations with senior u.s. government officials suggested that they saw patience as a vital element here because, frankly, there are limits to how much they can escalate. what they want to do is squeeze russia with sanctions and that's going to take awhile to really kick in and put pressure on putin. and at the same time, provide enough weapons and support so that ukraine can draw this out, draw this to the point that russia can't see a way to victory and may be willing to go and find its way to a negotiated settlement. so far, ukraine has shown remarkable resolve. but as i also said in the column, patience is a very

an attack on one nato nation is an attack on all. the u.s.olved in a direct conflict with russia, but if they use chemical weapons or small nuclear weapons they believe they would use, i think that that could possibly lead to an escalation and quite frankly a direct involvement in this conflict. >> appreciate it. thanks so much. look forward to the interview. that will be on right after "360." remember you can watch the full interview on "don lemon tonight." starts at 10:00 p.m. eastern right here in just a couple of minutes. >>> we'll be right back. just ahead, a very important video call between president biden and china's leader about the russian war effort. we'll have an in depth look at the close relationship xi jinping and russia's vladimir putin and the details on that call. >>> with the death toll rising, ukrainian and president biden held a call with china's president. he warned xi jinping about consequences if he should help putin. report on a friendly relationship between the two leaders that the u.s. hopes to upend. >> reporter: a

and if it's a non-nato nation that iswherein lies the authority for a nato response? >> well, for starters, very difficult to control weapons like chemical or biological. so, you could make the case, michael that you are, you, russia, are threatening nations because of lack of ability to control it. same as a tactical nuclear weapon, by the way. but i think what the president is referring to is, that is a step, using a weapon of mass destruction, that say step that would require nato to, the a minimum, consult and make decisions about responses. and i think the president is smart not to lay out exactly what we're going to do. where we're going to do it. because, michael, that response could be military. it could be more sanctions. it could be in cyber. it could be maritime, at sea. there are a lot of options that the west could take, if putin were foolish enough to use a weapon of mass destruction. whether or against a nato nation, or against a democracy like ukraine. i think the president's right, it would require a response. he's not going to show his hand of cards j

s. plans to muster all nato nations under the aegis of operation dropshot in 1949 the. the soviets acquired their own nuclear weapons. so any plan to annihilate the u. s . as i had to be postponed indefinitely. but the idea remains the same. the united states have to be seen as the only major player in the international arena. anyone who sold otherwise had to be wiped from the earth if the soviet union itself is no move, this is a victory for democracy and freedom. these events clearly serve on national interest. george bush was um, as of yet the only one i guess v i'm janet, she leashed to cost him 0. 1 and tablet block on mine was the visual of a dean. andy's milan sound unsigned. a saucen man, mother and child was in a noisy on and was on because he had to say that i completed true. no. jesus landis, ah, united states became the indispensable country. are worth exceptional people whose obligation was to lay down the path for all other countries. and so it became a new, renewed justification for american aggression in the world. it was the justification for the 20 yea