. >> another n-word is the word naziism. i'm convinced that the democratic party is totally soft and totally blind to current naziism, whether it's hamas oar hezbollah or islamists isis, and i'm wondering from a tactical point of view, whether we can't label the democratic opponent as soft on naziism -- >> nobody would understand it. i think you're right. islamic naziism is the exact, correct term for who they are. but the democratic party, the brain trust of the party, the center for american progress, has defamed every -- everyone who use the word islamo -- as islamophobes. in collusion with the muslim brotherhood. there should be an investigation of uma senior abadee, hiry's right hand and the chief adviser on muslim affairs, and she was a political operative for the muslim brotherhood. there's no question about that. >> you touched in a comment while i was in lane, saying that the democratic party is a religious movement almost. >> progressive. >> well, you also -- >> democratic party has some principled people, joe lieb

. >> another n word is the word, naziism. i'm convinced that the democratic party is totally soft and totally blind to current naziism, whether it's hamas or hezbollah -- >> yes. >> all of them, and i'm wonder, from a tactical point of view, whether we can't label the democratic opponent as soft on naziism -- >> well, nobody would understand it. i think you're right. islamic naziism is the exact correct term for who they are. but -- the democratic party, the center for american progress, has defamed every -- every everyone who uses the word, islam-o islamophobe. there should be an investigation of hillary's right hand. and the chief adviser in the state department on muslim affairs, and abane was a political operative for the muslim brotherhood, there's no question about that. >> you touched in a comment while i was in line, saying that the democratic party is a religious movement almost. >> progressive. democratic party -- some principled people, joe lieberman, and actually dick gephardt, did not turn around 180 degrees and

. >> there are not many still alive who experienced naziism firsthand.or that reason, feingold feels compelled to share with others what he went through. he's constantly going to schools, holding lectures, and telling people about his experience. it seems a miracle he survived. >> no prisoner between one meter 60 and one meter 80 weight more than 30 to 40 kilos -- wade -- weighed more than 30 to 40 kilos. you could tell who was going to die the next day. they were separated from the others and brought to be burned. >> does he still feel hatred? >> no, that's over. the past is the past. i only try to tell people, warned them, as i said earlier, put a gun in someone's hands, and anyone will be willing to shoot. we think not us, but everyone is. >> after the summer vacation, feingold will resume talking to school kids. he says he makes quite an impression on young people. they ask lots of questions. many know very little about the holocaust. that's something feingold and his wife want to change. >> nazi graffiti is popping up again. i do not want to think o

both from the soviet threat and also from naziism. and the united states came together as a nation and we threw off the yolk of the oppressor, the totalitarianism of our day. in other words, a regime that had an idea that it wanted to conquer the world with its evil and immoral philosophy. whether it was communism or whether it was naziism. it seems, mr. speaker, that every generation is confronted by a great evil and the moral questions of the day are related through that evil. the evil today, mr. speaker, that we are dealing with, is something known as islamic jihad. its face is ugly and its face has reared. not only just in recent decades and just the last few months of this summer, but islamic jihad is something that's been around as long as the inception of islam itself. but that regime of jihad has been defeated time and time again throughout history. but it was defeated through military might. it wasn't defeated through diplomacy. it was defeated through military might. and defeated it was. it was defeated at the battle of the

kissinger said, it would be the most serious and dangerous thing he has seen is in lifetime to include naziismand communism because it would lead to likely a nuclear exchange. so these are the issues that clearly are major national security challenges and this would take a back seat. >> let me ask you this,fx gener, about the administration's argument, and expressed before-that climate change has contributed to the unstable we're seeing in the middle east. what do you make of that? >> i don't think there's any correlation to that whatsoever. what is contributed to the unstable in the middle east is the fact that a lack of political and social justice and economic repression. that has given rise to radicals to take advantage of that, and to attempt to move the country in a different direction. has nothing to do with climate change. >> then what page are we on? because whatever coalition we're building to deal with isis, and whatever coalition we're building to deal with climate when, we have much better oddded of building a coalition to deal with climate change than we do with what is going on

we did it with naziism and fascism, but it's very, very hard to do, and you have got to get your ducksn order. >> about ten years ago the 9/11 commission wrote the following, the u.s. government must: i'm dwelling on that last sentence, we should reach out, listen to, and work with other countries that can help. with we doing that the right way? >> well, if the objective is to deny them a safe haven that can be accomplished probably with means far less than if your objective is to destroy. but we have gone beyond the safe haven rationale for what we are doing, that would be a strong preference for everybody. we all want to deny them a safing haven. we have gone far beyond that. we're saying we want to destroy. and that means much longer term. much more money being spent, and a long-term effort. >> congressman you were the chairman of the house foreign affairs committee and the chairman of the house intelligence committee, how would you deal with the fact that we are gathering this coalition, but both the government of syria and iran are not represented? >> i think it presents very diff

foreign countries who we were mostly locked into battle with and who we have to beat, and we have beat naziismd beat the evils that overtook japan, and did those things -- our parents' generation did those things at massive, massive cost, for they were the right things to do for the first time issue think certainly in the history ofç the u.s.a., and pretty much in any serious measure in the history -- we had guy fox, -- you know, we have now got the fifth column inside our country. and we can debate what we ought to be doing in syria and in iraq, but surely our first priority is to maintain the citizen safety in our own countries, and i'm sorry but if that means giving up just a few of those freedoms, i think we have to do it, because if we don't, the consequences will be so grave that we would never, ever forgive ourselves. >> thank you very much, sir. >> thank you. >> meanwhile, to what nigel was mentioning about protecting our borders. an issue that did not come up in the president's speech, even to the an for has been quoted as +xiu(vj to cross the border. he says if thousands of illegals

. >> of course we've seen this before, we saw it with naziism and that phrase, evil. such atrocious behavior becomes normalized in that context, one's own standards of what bar barity becomes to mean is the new normal. if the power of the -- or pervasive nature is justified in the name of my own religion, islam, it's why it becomes so important, so crucial. not just for all of society, but muslims as part of society, to stand with everybody else and be vocal not just in the condemnation of these acts, but actively work to undermine the i'd yolg that underpins them. >> do you feel the muslim community has been vocal in doing that? >> i think no one's been vocal enough. muslims need to do more, so does president obama. i can't believe that the president of the most powerful country in the world said he had no strategy to deal with isis in syria. mainstream society needs to do more. one way in which mainstream society can do more, is to accept this isn't a clash of civilizations between islam and the western world. it's an intrareligious struggle within islam, it's a cla

what is the difference between that and naziism? they want to destroy israel, they want to destroy the west, convert or die. what's the difference? >> well, the difference is the nazis didn't plan to take over the whole world. the caliphate does. my concern is that six months from now when this has proved to be mission impossible when the moderate sunni -- i mean the moderate shiite armies don't materialize -- >> don't get the job done. >> when the iraqis don't get the job done. when there is no coalition, then we're going to have three choices. we leave without defeating isis. we send in big boots on the ground. i mean a major ground surge. that will never happen. or i think worst of all -- >> kick it down the road. >> no, they turn to the iranians and say you do the job and the iranians will say, sure, but guess what the price tag is? we want nukes and we want you to go along with it. >> you use the nazi analogy, i have 200 family members, great aunts -- killed in the holocaust. i don't use that lightly either. but in the book in

a defense of the ukrai ukraineians in terms of their nationalistic sentiments saying there isn't naziism going on in ukraine. that is a chief argument and accusation made by the russians as to what is happening in the ukraine, sort of bolstering their support back home in moscow. the president really calling that propaganda, and then there are a couple of veiled references, wolf, to what happened in nazi, germany, back in world war ii, the president making oblique references almost accusing vladimir putin of having the same kinds of designs on europe. there were some subtle references in this speech that he just gave a few moments ago and also in his remarks at that news conference earlier this morning. i picked up on that as well. obviously the president has been thrown off mess annuage somewha. he intended this to be all about ukraine and russia and delivering moral support to eastern europeans about their part in nato but obviously, wolf, the events unfolding in syria and iraq with respect to isis, the beheading of american journalist steven sotloff, the president responded to that ea

. >> rose: a new strain of naziism.use of the idea barberrism is still a political advantage. >> i think a most destructive idea is the notion of utopia quite honestly. paradise. if you think you could make all of mankind happy forever just by killing a few million people, it's the only rational thing to go do it. of these young, some of them very marginal have a strong belief in paradise and the after life. and are prepared to do what's necessary to get themselves there but also get their brethren there. it's a fatal idea, utopia is. >> rose: like religion. people are prepared to do anything in some cases. >> yes. you know, there are all kinds of atheists i know being very loud living way down in what's stupidly called the bible belt. i think even the great american physicist steven weinberg has been down there 40 years and has always spoken for his beliefs chest entirely secular. he said in all these years no one ever raised a finger against him. >> rose: in theá bible belts tolerant. >> there's no longer the rampant

we did it with naziism and fascism. it's not easy. it takes a long time and it takes an affirmative approach to appeal to the people who are very disaffected in this part of the world. that part of the strategy has to be spelled out for me. i haven't heard very much about it. >> sir, we've heard a lot of people speaking the the need for an international coalition. it strikes me your ideas of destroying the ideology would be best served if an international coalition participated in that, correct? if you had a group of nations agreeing on saying this is something that we as a world need to combat. >> absolutely. you're exactly right. it especially has to include countries from the islamic world. the united states does not have the credibility with islam, with the muslims across the world, that we would like to have. better by far, if this message were put forward by our allies in the islamic world, and that's an essential part of it. >> one of the things you assessed in the september 11th commission is when the threat to al qaeda should

an ideology i've said before in this program that is as evil as naziism, fascism and communism.look at it that way. we wouldn't let nazis in world war ii come in, and we had americans with passports that were nazis. they were immediately arrested or tried or whatever. the fact is is that's the way it ought to be today. >> but the problem, general, is that if you were a member of the nazi party, that was identifiable. and if you are a radical jihadist, it's not necessarily identifiable. the members of isis don't run around with carrying cards and so we're going to get into a situation where we start saying you're out, you're out, you from minneapolis went over there to syria and now you've been in iraq, you're suspected so you're out. the guy's going to hire the aclu and file a lawsuit and say i had relatives in syria, i wanted to study the quran. >> well, that's our challenge. and that's why we need to have legislation that clearly delineates that, that you don't go to syria to study the quran and be a member of a terrorist group. and so there probably will be more compelling ev

they get fascism and naziism in germany. >> was it all a terrible waste?to end all wars. barely two decades later, world war ii began. >> osgood: coming up. >> from three billion passenger pigeons to none. i still can't believe it. >> osgood: birds of a feather. especially now that i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat, not caused by a heart valve problem. i was taking warfarin, but wondered if i kept digging, could i come up with something better. my doctor told me about eliquis... for three important reasons. one, in a clinical trial, eliquis was proven to reduce the risk of stroke better than warfarin. two, eliquis had less major bleeding than warfarin. and three, unlike warfarin, there's no routine blood testing. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and i

there was nothing written in stone about naziism and communism and whether they would win or we wouldies, men like fdr and truman and jfk and ronald reagan who rose to the occasion. and we won for another reason, because those presidents and the american people and our cultural elites knew that this civilization, judeo-christian civilization, western civilization is worth defending. [applause] today while our leaders show weakness abroad, obama and his allies do everything or they can to rip out of our society all the vestiges that made this judeo-christian civilization, our believer that liberty comes -- belief that liberty comes from god, that it has to be ordered, based in virtue. that's what made us different, and that's what the liberal elites of this country can't stand. ladies and gentlemen, i know nobody likes to talk directory about these things -- directly about these things. i'm under no such obligation to avoid speak-truthing. we've got a president today more interested in defending the reputation of islam than he does in saving the lives of christians. [cheers and applaus

have destroyed ideologies in it'sast, naziism, fascism, taken a lot of effort. to be accompanied by an affirmative message that appeals to the good judgment of the vast muslims.of i want to see not just a military component, an ntelligence component, and economic component, but i want to see a strategy that has an appeal toe message to the good instincts of so many people in that part of the world. you've got to fight an ideology with a better ideology. we clearly have that when you about isis. host: it's been 10 years since commission put out their report. and one of the recommendations the u.s. does not act aggressively to find itself in the islamic world, the u.s. for us. do it have we been successful in identifying ourselves? guest: we've been successful with good people, moderate democratic, small d minded people in that region of the world. voices have not prevailed. they have not been successful in appeal. isis an they've been remarkably successful, really, in their extremists.e and getting their support. they seem to have an unending supply of those peop

there was nothing written in stone about naziism and communism and whether they would win or we would, men like fdr and truman and jfk and ronald reagan who rose to the occasion. and we won for another reason, because those presidents and the american people and our cultural elites knew that this civilization, judeo-christian civil, western civilization is worth defending. [applause] today while our leaders show weakness abroad, obama and his allies do everything they can to rip out of our societal all the vestiges that made this judeo-christian civilization; our belief that liberty comes from god, that it has to be ordered liberty, it has to be based in virtue. that's what made us different, and that's what the liberal elites of this country can't stand. ladies and gentlemen, i know nobody likes to talk directly about these things. i'm under no such obligation to avoid speak truthing. we have got a president today more interested in defending the reputation of islam than he does in saving the lives of christians. [applause] >> yes! yes! [applause] yes! >> thank you. you know, he said

naziism arises. and we become allies of the soviet union.oes from joe stalin, butcher, to uncle joe and we're sending all kinds of supplies and they actually -- it's their force of arms that do the large share of winning world war ii. so why do i bring all of this up? the question is really on the table, are we now going to have some sort of, not alliance, but some sort of arrangement with assad in syria, who we have declared as a major enemy over the last three years, who we have called for regime change in syria, are we now going to essentially be on the same side of him -- with him when it comes to fighting isis. >> janine, i've been hearing a lot that's almost unavoidable. if you're going to take out assad, you just heard lawrence say you've got to have a partner on the ground. well, is he going to be the guy? >> well, it's clear the president hasn't decided yet. he did say yesterday during the nato summit in his remarks that the free syrian army needs -- he acknowledged perhaps the u.s. should have been aiding them more. i think he want

have destroyed ideologies in it'sast, naziism, fascism, taken a lot of effort. has to be accompanied by an affirmative message that appeals to the good judgment of the vast muslims.of i want to see not just a military component, an ntelligence component, and economic component, but i want to see a strategy that has an appeal toe message to the good instincts of so many people in that part of the world. you've got to fight an ideology with a better ideology. we clearly have that when you about isis. host: it's been 10 years since commission put out their report. and one of the recommendations the u.s. does not act aggressively to find itself in the islamic world, the u.s. for us. do it have we been successful in identifying ourselves? guest: we've been successful with good people, moderate democratic, small d minded people in that region of the world. voices have not prevailed. they have not been successful in appeal. isis an they've been remarkably successful, really, in their extremists.e and getting their support. they seem to have an unending supply of those

>> we didn't have a problem saying naziism is wrong. >> exactly. >> there is a blockage here.n on the path administration knot to engage in a war simply because it's going to go beyond al qaeda and isis. it's going to go to the muslim brotherhood, the islamic republic. that's the reason. >> interesting. we need more reporting on that. we appreciate you coming on this morning. thank you. >> thank you for having me. >>> coming up, toronto mayor rob ford talking from his hospital bed after doctors find a possible tumor. we have the latest on his condition, coming up. >>> and the popular shopping website getting political, banning all washington redskins product in an effort to be tolerant. but what they do allow will shock you. stay tuned. [ male announcer ] if you suffer from a dry mouth then you'll know how uncomfortable it can be. [ crickets chirping ] but did you know that the lack of saliva can also lead to tooth decay and bad breath? [ exhales deeply ] [ male announcer ] well there is biotene. specially formulated with moisturizers and lubricants, biotene can provide soothi