new treatment facilities in delhi and the e.u. may ban travelers from the u.s. brazil and russia when it reopens its external borders according to the new york times new york and berlin have canceled marathons due to coronavirus concerns. let's have a quick check of some other stories making news around the world a special prosecutor in the hague has filed an indictment against kosovo president husham toci and 9 other defendants for war crimes including murder and crimes against humanity he led and he served forces during the kosovo war in the late 1990 s. a special tribunal has been operating since 2015. heavy rains have triggered floods and landslides in parts of eastern and central china within $200.00 hectares of farmland and hundreds of houses were inundated in eastern on his province in central hunan the rains breached dams and displaced some 60000 people for. while russia has staged a massive military parade to commemorate its victory over nazi germany 75 years ago the event was originally scheduled for the 9th of may anniversary but postponed due to the pandemic for many russians victory day is one of the nation's most important holidays honoring the sacrific

so in the first week "the new york times," new york post, new york daily news did all cover the stonewalliots but it was buried knot news. it was not front page news. the voice did major stories and had reporters on the scene even trapped inside of the bar during the riots. and those were much more significant stories but it was really the alternative press and the lgbt press that covers the riots more sympathetically, more comprehensively and those are the stories that historians rely on along with oral histories and police reports and photographs for round out of the picture of what happened those week. >> and one of those the documentary of lilly van vance. our guest is marc stein joining us from greenwich village in new york. also the author of rethinking the gay and lesbian movement and city ofsterly and brotherly love as we talk about stonewall, the riots 50 years ago, a turning point for the lgbtq community. tom is own for the phone from flint, michigan. good morning. >> good morning to both of you gentleman and to all of the viewe viewers. this will be brief. just a little context

new york times and washington post . dean of the new york times hates donald trump. are not objective. how can you stand before all of your viewers here and saying things like objectiveot news. to balance the new york times, you have got to go to something like the daily columns or summing pretty when you resort to the new york times daily. greta: what we read a myriad of papers, wall street journal also in washington times. two papers that are perceived as conservative. the new yorkie times and washington post, those are national newspapers . would rated them to show you what folks in washington, the decision-makers are reading. so that you know how they are getting their information. you can disagree print were not promoting these newspapers . whatletting you know others are reading. and you can disagree with it and call up and voice your opinion. the washington post this morning

yes, it looks at the new york times —— the new york times looks at developing countries such as indiae governments are having a very hard choice because they have to choose between the economy and the public health, and because the economic situation everywhere is very difficult and very dire, they opt to open the economy again. but if you look at mexico, i think it was india, sorry. 10,000 new infections a day. russia still sees 8000 new infections a day. so this is quite a scary outlook when you have to choose between the economy and the public health. the pandemic is farfrom being under control. i'm pleased to say that caroline we are learning alsojoined us say that caroline we are learning also joined us now. say that caroline we are learning alsojoined us now. —— caroline wheeler. good to see you. just standing on that new york times story because if this balance between health and the economy when it comes to developing countries, it's just so tough for them to make that call. absolutely. we can see it even in the uk. there's been a phenomenal struggle within government to weigh

new treatment facilities in delhi the e.u. may ban travelers from the united states brazil and russia when it reopens its external borders according to the new york times and new york and burnley have cancelled marfan's due to coronavirus concerns. for some other stories from around the world will start in germany where every year pharmaceutical company bear has agreed to pay up to $10900000000.00 u.s. dollars to settle a lawsuit of the weed killer roundup the firm has faced numerous lawsuits in the u.s. over claims that life a state based product causes cancer since it bought monsanto which manufactures. a special prosecutor in the hague has found an indictment against scores of us present asheem touchy and 9 others for war crimes including murder and crimes against humanity president touchy mad anti serb forces during the kosovo war in the 1990 s. the special tribunals been operating since 2015. pakistan's aviation minister says human error was to blame for last month's airliner crash in karate that killed 97 people the airbus a 320 plugged into a residential district near the airport while attempting to land initial reports says the pilots were distracted as the

irresponsible decision of "the new york times" to falsely report that he was briefed on something that he in fact was not briefed on and i really think that it's time for "the new york" to step back and ask themselves why they have been wrong, so wrong so often. "the new york times" falsely claimed paul manafort asked for polling data to oleg dare pos ka before a rejection and then agreed on russian interference before a correction that it was only four agencies and 2017 february of that year "the new york times" claimed trump campaign aides repeated contacts with russian intelligence which even james comey has said is almost entirely wrong "the new york times." "the new york times" published a column in march of 2019 by a former "times" executive editor exerting an overarching deal for the pro russian policy and investigated for three years with taxpayer dollars before ultimately getting an exoneration in the mueller report. it is inexcusable, the failed russia reporting of "the new york times" and times that the "the new york times" and also "the washington post" hand back their pulitzers. >> i have a separate question. >> okay. we're going to skip over that back

it is inexcusable the failed russian reporting of the new york times and i think it's tim that the new york times and the washington post hand back there pulitzer's. >> why hasn't the president condemned white power. why hasn't he condemned that tweet? >> we want to bring our pan power panel in. thank you both for talking to us . a lot to unpack coming out of the white house press briefing with kayleigh mcenany. let's start with russia. she slammed the new york times saying that there was no consensus made in the intelligence community. therefore to wait for the facts blaming one reporter on exposin a story about the president allegedly being briefed on the scenario that russia had put bounties on u.s. soldiers and u soldiers heads, that not being validated at this point, the president was not briefed on th matter, what say you? >> i guess i will go first. so, the press secretary could not have been more clear here. this is where the reporters her in the room our journalist activist, they are trying simpl to create their own false narrative bring up the russian collusion hoax yet again and

the criticism comes after "new york times" ran previous opinion pieces from american adversaries including vladmir putin, nicholas nicolas maduro and the taliban. "new yorkaffers didn't complain about that. >> you are absolutely right to point that out, this is mob rule at "the new york times." apparently, those op-eds from terrorists and dictatorships are not too much for these "new york times" journalists to handle but but an op-ed defending united states law from a united states senator, that 5% 8% of american -- 58% of the american population holds the same opinion that he expressed in that column, according to a morning consult poll, that is apparently what is putting "new york times" over the edge and causing this whole debacle. it is really another example of the left saying, the quiet things out loud. we all have known about the media bias for years. now we're seeing it plate out with our own eyes. elizabeth: you know "the new york times" also ran an opinion piece by the leader of turkey, the strong man dictator there, erdogan. he is the second worst in the world, his regime is the second worst in the world for locking up journalist. "the times"

new york times. yes, and what is important is that this is an opinion piece on the front page of the new york times. not a news piece, which is what you would expect on the front page of the paper. it is worth reading out, it says, brexit has propelled the nation to its current calamity. basically, it singles out the prime minister for basically, it singles out the prime ministerfor making basically, it singles out the prime minister for making claims basically, it singles out the prime ministerfor making claims going back to what happened, taking us out of europe, a decision that the new york times obviously disagreed with and the way, it is a critique of the way the boris johnson administration has what it feels mishandled and mismanaged the whole coronavirus crisis, taking late decisions, not admitting the mistakes that he has made and then throughout coming in late with the lockdown and now the way the relaxation is being done, actually, probably leading us to another pitfall and maybe even a calamity. but this is a very, very strong piece to have on the front page of one of the major papers in t

new york times what is their role in these ongoing wars. that because you came directly from the cia people might not believe that a 6 long detour the new york times in the new york times a major mainstream media as an establishment media that is to check and defending and extending the interests of the shrimp particularly their foreign agenda state not reporting on international affairs from the point of view of a neutral observer and showing the complexities of the conflict in the drama and america just being another player there pushing an agenda and part of that by the way as you're saying here is it adds trump last appeal to. i meant. the start or to go or not be on a use of all these things the real power in the united states the one wishing operating under cover of the new york times does not want to see the imperial interests and gender of the us should be meddled with by anyone including someone in the white house and this is what their problem has been with this guy not that he's a racist or that he is our will jim or grant or he's mishandled this pandemic but that he's meddling with their imperial international project and the gui

new york times," "new york herald," referred to them as herders. didn't even refer to them as cowboys. that was the place of the cowboy at the beginning of this trade. the real people working it were the stockmen, and mccoy gave us the myth of the stockmen, but that hasn't prevailed into modern culture, popular culture, has it? it's been the myth of the cowboy that has prevailed, which is sort of an irony that mccoy giving us the myth of the stockmen was not able to tap down the myth of the cowboy. but these are some of the things, some of the major things that i have come to understand about the trade that kind of opened my eyes to see it in a different kind of way in looking at a whole different set of connections that made it work or in some cases not made it work. so i thank you for your time, and i'd be happy to take any questions that you might have. [ applause ] so does anyone have a question? yes. >> professor sherow, i think about like how our -- like americans bodies in particular have changed in the 20th and 21st centuries because of our diets, quite drastically. i'm curious, it sounds like beef became a staple of the american diet after the civil war thanks to people like mccoy. i'm wondering have you -- in your research, have you uncovered any indicators or any evidence that like american culture or americans' health, way of life changed in that time period because of beef consumption? >> yes, that's an excellent question, and yes, it did. the texas cattle coming up always fetched lower prices than the short horns raised in canada or illinois or kentucky or ohio. and mccoy understood this, and so did texas cattlemen, and the idea was to get the men to some of the other markets in new york city. there were the fulton market, katherine market. this is oftentimes where people living in the tenements, very poor people went to buy their food, and so a great meal for them was when they could afford to buy beef, and beef became more prominent in their diets, especially after advances in creating the abattoirs or the slaughterhouses like allerton did, mass produced more beef than had ever been done before by like those 200 butcher shops that one time that populated the slaughterhouse district of manhattan. so yes, the poorer working class people started being able to buy beef on a more regular basis, but the cuts were cheaper. texas longhorn beef was never sold in delmonico restaurant. that never would have happened. it never would have had the fat, the marbling or anything else that went along with it. the longhorn at best seldom weighed over 900 pounds, and so it was a pretty small animal. and so the cuts were also leaner, even though the illinois stockmen tried to put

so in that first week the new york times, near post, new york daily news did all cover the stonewall riots. but it was buried. news it was not prominent front page news. the village voice did major stories on the stonewall riots and had reporters on the scene even trapped inside the bar during the riots. those were much more significant stories, but it was really the alternative press and the lgbt press that covered the riots more sympathetically, more comprehensively. those are the stories that historians rely on along with oral histories, police reports and photographs for rounding out the picture of what happened that week. >> and one of those is the documentary of ville even sense -- our guest is mark stein he's joining us from grant religion new york he is also the author of rethinking the gay and lesbian movement. in city and sisterly of brotherly love stonewall the rights 50 years ago a turning point for the lgbtq community tom is on the phone from flint michigan, good morning. >> good morning to both you gentlemen into all the viewers this will be pretty brief, just a little c

new treatment facilities in delhi the e.u. may ban trappers from the united states or brazil and russia when it reopens its external borders according to the new york times and new york unburned they have cancelled math institute 2 coronavirus concerns. i german pharmaceutical giant has agreed to pay nearly $11000000000.00 to settle a u.s. lawsuit over its weed killer round up the settlement covers tens of thousands of plaintiffs in claim the widely used pattis i gave them cancer insists that we can only say when used correctly and says it will continue to sell it without a warning label. around $50000.00 cancer stricken claimants will share some $9600000000.00 with a further $1200000000.00 to be held in reserve to cover any further claims by a struck an agreement to end a financial nightmare which began with its purchase of u.s. crop science giant monsanto a takeover this is proven very costly. 2 months after the acquisition in 2018 by a landed in court as the new owner a man who'd used monsanto's herbicide roundup had contracted cancer he accused the company of downplaying the weed killers risks a string of cases followed with by a losing one after the other round

new york at that time was the epicenter of the new york, in terms of population, i think cities 50 to 100 and if you take them in that city at the time and you add them up, they still didn't equal nework city. that is how central new york was at that time. and obviously they had a big fear. and remember that nra is an organizing charter out of new york. and that is where most of the members are and the headquarters is at. so that is when they start talking about the second amendment. more so in passing than death. >> under the auspice of the weapons crossing border in the 19th century we have -- and then the mob violence and gang violence and how did that affect the debate in this country? >> there is an interesting thing about the mob of gang -- i think everybody in the united states agreed there was a problem. so no one disagreed there. the only disagreement was in terms of how do you solve that problem? there was a movement in the united states that more or less looked at the united states, that the government was passing too many laws to catch the criminals that were hurting law-abiding citizens and that extended to firearms. so when they're debating that, while everybody agree

contacts with russian intelligence which even james comey has said was almost entirely wrong, "new york times." "new yorkh 2019 by a former "times" executive editor that asserted the trump campaign and russia had an overarching deal [ inaudible ] campaign for hillary for a new pro russian policy. that's why we call the russia hoax which was investigated for three years with taxpayer dollars before ultimately getting an exoneration in the mueller report. it is inexcusable, the failed russia reporting of the "new york times" and i think it's time the "new york times" and also "the washington post" hand back their pulitzers. reporter: why hasn't the president condemned white power, kayleigh? neil: there you go. that was short and sweet. a lot of the criticism on this bounty story that's been picked up by the "new york times" and others and since followed through that the president was aware of some intelligence that coming in, the russians were putting a bounty on u.s. soldiers, coalition forces soldiers including the british, never mind that that has not been proven and that the intelligence might be a lit

new york times. new york cityt mayor bill de blasio extended the city curfew to a second night, after more cases erupted. the original curfew was from 11:00 p.m. monday until 5:00 a.m. people are breaking the curfew. it is unclear how the city of 8 million people will be enforcing this curfew as well. we continue to see more protests tonight. haslinda: we also know 8000 police officers have been deployed in newick check of business flash headlines. facebook increasingly critical of ceo mark's lack of touch of social media comments by president trump, who tweeted about shooting looters last week. sayingk was restrained, people need to know more. several senior staff have declared disagreement with zuckerberg, calling a virtual work from home walk out. the rate of infection rising at to disclose job cuts. ibm has kept quiet about such matters, except in 1983, when they discussed many dismissals. ibm saying it will not give detailed numbers. taking a look at chinese markets before they get to the break. looks like we are seeing a flat session when it comes to chinese equities. they are bucking the trend from the risk rally we are seeing in the region. shenzhen by 1%. perhaps they are taking a look at trade headlines we have seen as well. we will check on markets with hong kong up 0.4%. this is bloomberg. ♪ is bloomberg. ♪ haslinda: looking at live pictures of the lion city at 11:30 a.m. in sing

and media have the right at their work as politically motivated to do a year out of new york times that not the new york times the. largest showed when the new book but much of the vast number crunching reporting on this story has come from russians like all of us working for medusa a new site safely based next door in latvia. there was a moment in mid april when journalists started noticing that official state they don't feel tallies wasn't matching the data from doctors but i see someone. did. some question. thank you only if there was a. my research has shown that the federal statistics are constructed in such a way that entire cities have been admitted at some point they just stopped adding the number of infected and dead people from certain locations in one place 25 fatalities were found but weren't counted. one mosco government official in charge of medical affairs told me in april that the bureaucracy was true noble like he said he was absolutely misinformed simply because his subordinates didn't want him to despair but eventually he was forced to face the facts even though parliament and the min

it is inexcusable, the failed russia reporting of the "new york times" and i think it's time the "new york times" and also "the washington post" hand back their pulitzers.

new york at the time was the epicenter of the united states. especially in terms of population, new york city i think it was number 5200, if you took 100 cities at the time, and you had them all up the population they still don't equal to newyork city. that's how central new york was, to the united states at that time. obviously they had a big fear, plus you have to remember that the nra, had to organize a charter from new york. that's where the headquarters are at. that's why they started talking about the second amendment. marshall and passing that in-depth. >> and of course the 19th century, we have the robber baron's, and the mob violence and how did those that affect this in this country. >> well there is an interesting thing i think everything in the eye safe knew there was a problem. so there's no disagreement there. the only disagreement, was more less in terms of how do you solve that problem. as there was a movement in the united states, that more list looked at you know that they were saying government was passing to many laws, as to catch the criminals as. and that extended to firearms. so when they're debating, that they all agreed it gangsters our problem. but the nra is arguing that, maybe these gun laws are

caller: well, if "the new york times" wants to actually have credibility -- i haven't read the sunday "new york times" in years because of stuff like this. i grew up reading the sunday "new york times." i grew up in new york and new jersey. but if they want to have credibility again, they have to start citing where their sources are coming from. let's know who the people are. let's know who's actually reporting it. do they have an agenda? are they making this up? this anonymous stuff has to stop. host: understand the point, john. more from "the new york times" piece about republican reaction in a statement a response to questions senator mcconnell, mitch mcconnell of kentucky said he had long warned about russia's work to undermine american interests in the middle east and southwest asia and noted he wrote an amendment last year rebuking mr. trump's withdrawal of source from syria and afghanistan. the u.s. needs to prioritize defense resources, maintain a regional military presence, and continue to pose serious consequences on those who threaten us and our allies. the taliban and russian mercenary force that is threatened our partners, mr. become connell said, aid for ot

because new york at the time was the epicenter of the united states in terms of population, new york city. i think cities 50 to 100, if you take them and add them all up they still didn't equal new york city. that's how central new york was to the united states at that time. obviously they had a big fear. plus you've got to remember florida is organizing a charter out of new york. that's where most of their members are and headquarters are at. that's when they really start talking about the second amendment. >> and of course under the auspices of these weapons crossing borders in the 19th century we had the mobber bearings and 20th century we had the mob violence and gang violence. how did that affect this country? >> i think everybody in the united states agreed there was a problem. the only disagreement was more or less in terms of how do you solve that problem? there was a movement in the united states that more or less looked that the government was passing too many laws to catch the criminals that were law-abiding citizens and that extended to firearms. while everyone agrees gang centers are a problem including the florida the florida believed maybe it's being financed by g

new york times" seems fit to print. shannon. >> shannon: howard kurtz, thank you. so for days after "the new yorkes" published a controversial op-ed by arkansas senator tom cotton, the newspaper's editorial page editor without submitting his resignation sunday. let's discuss what happened with fox news senior political analyst brit hume, welcome back. >> thank you, shannon. >> shannon: so michael goodwin writing about this in "the new york post" says this. he says it's noteworthy that the case reporters lead the attacks on cotton. accustomed to having their views ruled the news pages, they've been itching to control the opinion pages as well and now they do. what you think of where we are? >> well, he's got a point i think and what was so striking about this, shannon, was that not only did james bennett, the now ousted editor of the editorial page of "the new york times," step aside. after having defended the decision to publish the cotton piece, publisher of the newspaper, the young -- his only young compared to me i guess, has supported the decision and has now reversed himself. you know, the n

new york at that time was the epicenter of the united states in terms of population, new york city, i think cities number 50 to 100, if you take the 50 to 100th city at that time and you add them up, the populations, they still didn't equal new york city. that's how central new york was to the united states at that time. obviously they had a big fear. plus you've got to remember that the nra is organized chartered out of new york and that's where most of their members are and their headquarters is at. that's when they start talking about the second amendment, more so in passing than in depth though. >> on the auspices of the weapons crossing the borders. we had robert bareson in the 20th century, the mob violence and gang violence. how did that affect the debate in this country? >> well, there's an interesting thing about the mob. i think everybody in the united states agreed there was a problem. so, no disagree there. the only disagreement was more or less in terms of how do you solve that problem? there was a movement in the united states that more or less looked at the united states -- that the government was passing too many laws to catch the criminals that were burdening law-abiding citizens. and that extended to firear

new york. look at this new york times headline, the editorial board of the new york times writes this to de blasioen your eyes. the police are out of control. what can governor cuomo do about it at this point? and rudy, i mean, these thousands on the streets of new york city for a tenth day in a row, how much longer can this go on? >> it can't go on for much longer. they have been peaceful. they were yesterday. they were the day before. it does put a tremendous strain on the police department and the idea that the police department and the new york times -- the police department is out of control is totally crazy. it's complete construct of the left. it's like the hysteria they created over police brutality and last year only nine black men -- unarmed black men were shot by police officers. 20 white men were. and blacks were killed 99% of the time by other people, civilians. 80% black and then everybody else. so basically police brutality when it happens is shocking and terrible but it's not at all -- it's not even close to systemic. it's very rare, actually. that's just the truth. that's not raci

new york times. >> what we saw people exercising first amendment rights, but in the meantime we publish exact argument in new yorkimes. editor and owner defended it in public statements, but then they totally surrendered to a woke child mob from news room that apparently gets triggered if they're presented with any opinion contrary to their own as oppose to telling woke children this is a workplace and not a social justice seminar on campus. dagen: former house speaker fox news contributor and author of trump and the american future, newt gingrich. what do you make of the move in "the new york times"? given the opinion, it's expected, is it not? >> newt: what you're seeing and i wrote a book last year trump versus china which captures what's going on. people are supposed to in public confess that they've been guilty, people who have to tell whatever the party line is and we were warned years ago in farm and sometimes the mob gets to change what things matter and your job is to trail the mob and do what the mob tells you. when we see an institution collapse totally in front of the mob, it tells you what's going on

putin, nicolas maduro and the taliban, new york times staffer did not complain about thatat. >> you are absolutely right to point that out, this is bob at the new yorkist and dictatorship are not too much for the new york times journalist to handle but an op-ed defending united states law from united states senator that 58% of the american population holds an opinion that amm cotton expressed, 58% of the american population holds the same opinion that he expressed in the column according to a morning call. apparently that is what is putting new york times overe the edge and causing the whole debacle. it's really another example of the left saying the quiet things out loud, we all had known about this, media bias for years now are seeing a play out with our own eyes. liz: the new york times also ran in opinion piece by the leader of turkey. he is the second worst in the trld for the locking of journalists and times ran an opinion piece by him. let's listen to senator tom cotton demanded the new york times retract a smear that he says is false and offensive that he did not call for the military to stop protesters, he called for the military to stop th

new york times" as a sign of protest to your piece. also eliot engel who is obviously up for his conversation in new york said that he will not seek the ing of "the new york times," which is interesting, because alexandria ocasio-cortez is the opponent running against impaired who knows that he would've gotten in any way. but to the content that you were writing about, here's the police commissioner in new york asking about the underlying subject that you wrote about. watch this. >> does new york city need uniform soldiers to keep the police? the piece, rather? >> absolutely, not to. >> martha: there is pushback that new york city would provoke things, and make things worse and potentially more dangerous, what do you say to that? >> yes, well, i bet a lot of business owners in midtown manhattan who had their businesses smashed by people who brought crowbars and bricks to a peaceful protest would beg to differ that the new york police department, not because of their own faults, but because of their hapless mayor cannot protect their property, their livelihoods, and in some cases many were threatened or felt threatened for their lives a

new york times" staffers in danger. that was a show of solidarity by staffers of the paper. there are times when columns and op-eds in "the new york times" cause controversy, that's sometimes the intent. what makes this difference, i think, is how widespread the reaction was inside "the new york times" with more than 1,000 staffers talking about it in internal chat rooms and by what management then did as a result. because at first "the new york times" editor acknowledged the concerns but tepidly saying i believe in the principle of openness to a range of opinions, even those we may disagree with, and this piece was published in the spirit. james bennett wrote, readers who might be inclined to oppose cotton's position needs to be fully aware of it and reckon with it. the paper said we found a rushed editorial process led to an op-ed that didn't meet our standard. there was a tense town hall meeting with staffers on friday. salzburger said cotton's piece shouldn't run and bennett announced it would not run in print and there wouldn't be as many op-eds in the future. friday evening "the times" added an editor's note to the piece exp

president trump at the white house this afternoon created the new york time -- criticized "the new york did not deny the core of the reporting. former vice president joe biden said if the report is true, trump has done worse than nothing. >> he had had this information according to the times, and yet he offered to host putin in the united states and sought to invite russia to rejoin the g7. his entire presence has been a gift to putin. but this is beyond the pale. >> reporter: "the new york times" put out a second report alleging that u.s. intelligence and special ops alerted superiors as early as january and also saying the new intel stems from a special ops raid on a tall ban outpost. -- taliban outpost. jon? jon: jacqui heinrich report anything new york city, thank you. >> >>> coming up, florida congressman greg steube joins me to discuss how his state is managing the coronavirus crisis ahead of the republican nominating convention in jacksonville. ♪ ♪ they get that no two people are alike and customize your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. almost done. what do you th

new york times" in its reporting. "the new york times"' reporting and all other subsequent news reports about such an alleged briefing rate. former dni richard grenell said, it's inaccurate, stop politicizing intelligence. joining us tonight, our guest says "the new york times" has blood on their hands for even publishing the fictional story. congressman jim banks, an active officer in the navy reserve who served in afghanistan. congressman, great to have you with us. this is more idiocy from "the new york times". at some point you would think they would become somewhat embarrassed by their unnamed sources and their propensity to report absolute claptrap. >> you would think so, lou, but obviously not. if this is a despicable hit piece by "the new york times" published on friday with one clear intention, and that's to damage president trump as we get closer to election day by rehashing the russian-trump collusion hoax narrative that the american people have have grown so tired of. the democrats, on the other hand to, they took the bait. they jumped the gun on friday, and it's confusing as you already mentioned to keep

new york times." now, we have no indication, no evidence that the story is accurate. we all know, any person knows that "the new york" hates republicans. "new york times" would support a dead raccoon over a republican if the raccoon had a d behind its name. >> martha: reporting wrong on the russian hoax as it was called for several years. so i think that there is an effect approach that is why it is. and we will see what the president comes forward with after the briefing. there is a lot of questions about why he would not be briefed on this. but at the time saying that he was also not briefed, so it looks like it may have been percolating at levels that did not rise to that at least in terms of what they knew and did not know at that point. but anyway, the story leaked. so unfortunately, i heard him say moments ago that he said unfortunately we may not to learn much more about it because it was leaked before they were able to follow through on these leads and the intelligence. we will see where it goes. a senator, thank always good to see you. coming up, president trump, thinking about dropping out of the race? his

still ahead, the editor of the new york times has resigned after doctors objected to the new york timeson piece by republican senator tom cotton and he is saying just like lbj, jfk, george h.w. did the used of militaryry to back up the cops d the looting. we will ask kelsey of the independent women's forum where was the new york times outrage after the times ran opinion pieces from the american enemy including vladimir putin, nicolas maduro and the taliban. that story next. ♪ ♪ [ engines revving ] ♪ ♪ it's amazing to see them in the wild like th-- shhh. for those who were born to ride, there's progressive. so as you head back out on the road, we'll be doing what we do best. providing some calm amidst the chaos. with virtual, real-time tours of our vehicles as well as remote purchasing. for a little help, on and off the road. now when you buy or lease a new lincoln, we'll make up to 3 payments on your behalf. and still going for my best. even though i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib... ...not caused by a heart valve problem. so if there's a better treatment than warfarin, i

new york times" you do that every day. "new york times and washington post. you know the newk times hates donald trump, they are not objective. how can you pass off something -- like "therump new york times" to balance "the new york times" you would have to go to breitbart. white hue resort to "the new york times" daily? host: we read a variety of papers. the washington examiner" which is continued -- considered conservative, "washington post," this is what washington insiders are reading. we're not promoting them. we let you know what others are reading. you can disagree with it and voice your opinion. "the washington post" this morning on the economy -- the pandemic might hobble the economy. todd saying he disagrees with the shutdown in the first place. ripples from downturns will affect businesses big and small. christopher in obama. you support shutting down again. why? what is happening? yes, where i live in oklahoma, we have had an increase in cases. --urday, we had an increase a few hundred and 25 cases or something. where i live, no one wears masks, no one wears glove

the outlines of the story as first reported by "the new york times" have now been confirmed by nbc news. "the new york times" phrased it this way and each word of this matters. american intelligence officials have concluded that a russian military intelligence unit secretly offered bounties to taliban linked militants for killing forces in afghanistan, including targeting american troops amid the peace talks to end the long-running war there according to officials briefed on the matter. the times reported, quote, the intelligence finding was briefed to president trump. that's the crucial line there, the intelligence finding was briefed to president trump. an awkward phrasing that leaves possibilities. "the washington post" followed "the new york times" reworport h this. russian bounties offered to taliban-linked militants to kill coalition forces in afghanistan are believed to have resulted in the deaths of several u.s. service members, according to intelligence gleaned from u.s. military interrogations of captured militants in recent months. the reporting on this story this weekend left the trump whi

new york times." this is the left's version of fake news. a staffer at the "new yorkn't agree with the column and wanted to squelch the opinion without debating the issues. it's a rejection of liberal values. the mission of the "new york times" is a page for civil discourse and debate. when you have a faction of the newsroom demanding censorship and shutting speech down that's not the type of journal i am familiar with and it's disturbing with the "new york times." >> harris: look at the screen. your title is editor. this is what you do. you have conversations about what makes a publication as an editor. what strikes you to really be the worst part of this for the "new york times"? >> well, i believe a good healthy newsroom has diversity of thought and it looks like america. you have need to have diversity of all kinds in any newsroom. it looks like the diversity of thought especially in an op-ed page and the "new york times" always made it clear they want liberal and conservative views. they want to push the boundaries. this is not like some publications that have a

another book coming out the neas niece is one that helped "new york times" look into president's taxes, leakerred tax information to the "new yorkhat is reaction to that book coming out? >> hard to be able to judge. we'll see what comes out on facts and figures. a lot of folks will too to make money off the president at this point in the campaign, to try to distract the campaign. get the facts out and than trying to sell the book to profit off the president. elizabeth: senator, thanks so much for joining us. really appreciate it. >> glad to be with you. elizabeth: okay, still ahead, the trump campaign is now calling cnn's brian stelter quote, sexist for his personal attack on trump campaign legal advisor jenna ellis. in an interview now being called a quote, a train wreck. it was about the trump campaign's threat to sue cnn over a poll last week that showed joe biden 14 points ahead. this is hot controversy. we have rnc chairwoman ronna mcdaniel on her take on that. why the trump campaign is threatening lawsuits on other media as well. that story next i wanted more from my copd medicine, that's why i've got the power of 1,2,3 me

i don't know that i can document they would be a new york times bestseller. the new yorkimes did not exist yet. but they were very popular, and it is remarkable to look at the story of, for example, mormons who were living in illinois at that time looking for a place to relocate farther west. they in their own newspaper printed excerpts of a fremont's reports about the great salt lake and then had portions of his report read at a public reading inside a mormon temple that brigham young attended. it seems very clear fremont's explorations in the part of the world influenced the choice of the mormons to go to the salt lake area and create what ultimately became their own state. susan: you tell the story that as jessie became famous through his exploits -- excuse me, as john became famous, jessie was becoming better known. this is a time when the abolition movement was starting up, when women were starting to begin to push for more rights in society. did she use her fame for those causes? steve: she totally did. it is fascinating she became a symbol of women's rights and of

new york time. in buffalo, new york, two police officers have been suspended after a video of them pushing an elderly protester to the ground went viral. the video shows the 75-year-old lying motionless with blood pooling around his head. been hospitalized in serious condition. is set to -- opec-plus is set to extend production cuts. saudi arabian pressure were able to reach a tentative deal with holdout member iraq. they were pushing the iraqis to stop shirking their share of cutbacks. brexit talks between the u.k. and european union are set to finish today without a trade agreement. negotiators are still far apart on crucial issues ahead a key deadline -- ahead of the key deadline at the end of the month. that will add pressure for boris johnson and ursula von der leyen to intervene directly. global news 24 hours a day, on air and at quicktake by bloomberg, powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in i'm than 120 countries, leigh-ann gerrans. this is bloomberg. francine? tom? tom: thank you so much. we welcome all of you to "bloomberg surveillance." you would think we were talking jobs, etc. the data matters. markets are on the move in subtle ways that need to be made clear. futures elevate, no question about that, with the vix coming in well under 25. that is a huge deal in a huge week of equity performance. the real story is that the yield market in some of this off what we saw from christine lagarde yesterday -- i will go right to it -- the vanilla spread, the difference between the two-year yield and the 10-year yield has .oved three standard deviations here is a sophisticated word for that. it is a join or must steepening -- it is a ginormous steepening in the yield curve. francine: stocks rallying and the treasuries falling as investors are focusing on the stimulus, of

new york times, the new york herald tribute refer to them as herders. they did not refer to them as cowboys. that was the place of the cowboy at the beginning. the real people working it or the stockmen. mccoy gave us the myth of the stockmen, but that hasn't prevailed into modern popular culture, has it? it has been the myth of the cowboy that has prevailed, which is sort of an irony that mccoy, giving us the myth of the stockman was not able to tap down the middle of the cowboy. these are some of the things, some of the major things that i have come to understand about the trade. the kind of opened my eyes to see it in a different kind of way and looking at a whole different set of connections that made it work, or in some cases, not made it work. i thank you for your time. i would be happy to take any questions that you might have. (applause) is anyone have a question? yes. >> professor james sherow. i think about how americans bodies in particular have change in the 20 than 24 centuries because of our diets quite drastically. it sounds like beef became a staple of the american diet after the civil war, thanks to people like mccoy. i'm wondering, have you in your research uncovered any indicators or any evidence, like american culture, or americans health the way of life changed in that time period because of beef consumption? >> that is an excellent question. yes it did. the texas capital coming up had lower prices then the short horns raised and count canada, illinois or kentucky and ohio. mccoy understood this. so did the texas cattleman. the idea was to get the men the meat to some of the other markets to new york city. this is oftentimes where people living in the tenants, very poor people went by their foods. a great meal for them was when they could afford to buy beef. beef became more prominent in their diets, especially after advances and creating the arbiters or the slobber slaughterhouse. they were able to mass produce the had ever been done before like those 200 butcher shops that populated the slaughterhouse district of manhattan. the poor working class people started being able to buy beef on a more regular basis, but the cuts were cheaper. texas longhorn beef was never sold or served in the darwinistic in the delmonico's restaurant, excuse me. >> the best weighed over 900 pounds. it was a pretty small animal. the cuts were also leaner. even though the illinois stockman try to put on a little more fat and wait on it by over wintry name before putting them into the eastern markets. yes sir. >> the trade, the abilene, if i'm correct, was 1867 to 71, is that correct roughly? >> 72.