nyu chamber orchestra. enjoy the rest of your evening. thank you. it's always a privilege for me to work with young scholars who are passionate about white house history, and i look forward to the excellent work and research that will be accomplished through our partnership with the steinhardt school. a few months before the gala. we began working with renowned filmmaker donna lawrence and her team to produce a film that featured the legacy of the association and a look forward into the future. we debuted this film on the walls of the temple of dandoor at the gala. here it began with a vision and a vow. surveying the drab state of the white house environment jacqueline kennedy set to work and pointed the way it would be a sacrilege. she said merely to redecorated it must be restored and that's a question of scholarship. her effort spurred the creation of the white house historical association organized to gather preserve and share the essence of this remarkable symbol of our democracy and effort sustained during every presidency since and propelled

i like to thank my legal team from nyu, alina das and her staff. they did an excellent job. grateful. amy: jean, let me ask alina das. i think we last had you on when you are about to give birth but you are right there standing with jean. in 2021, jean is allowed back in the united states. he was deported for his immigrant rights activism under trump. there are a couple of threads of legal cases here involving jean. can you lay out these cases? it is amazing it is your students who argued the case yesterday. >> absolutely. thank you, amy. certainly, i know i speak for the entire nyu immigrants rights team, including yolanda and gabriella who represented jean at the hearing yesterday. we are so honored to be standing in solidarity with him and his incredible family in the church. you are right, there's been so much that has been poured into jean's case. we have been inspired by his incredible voice, leadership through families for freedom and the new sanctuary movement in new york city. it has helped thousands of immigrants. it was an honor for us to step in where we could. w

of the altar nastau of sostyuk, uh and oke uh vacanalize behind the ornament with the sculpture, a nyuere the forks of a high-class professional brothers. so the church itself was prigozhin with plaster decorative elements with ideal criteria. what climbed from a pear, you see, it took days to paint than to fashion everything, so here are the first altars. we started, yes, restorations, then we uplifted the pop-forgers, we removed the ruminated ones and the wall-mounted altars of the mouse in the summer of malinka they went. yes, and they were termed. this is not rococore, which went on hats. otherwise , you can shackled the barracks for more than 20 fresco compositions. this is not only a pattern in the yau-lenjig of the remnant of aliya, an important and old omniki, frescoes by the son-in-law of vengeance by the moscow troops in 1.654 and the slaughter of the xianz give evidence of important historical events and show the panorama of the city. in the interior there is a painting of an unknown glass, and in the north-west he was feeding a monk and his name was haunted. iosif david alb

uh, studying at nyu is quieter. this is our famous school went unlearned and returned.e would be my soviet vgik, she would study vovka at the same time . this is really, maybe, it’s very useful to even live for some period, learn to work, so that your country is understandable undoubtedly. it's true, it's sasha's fault that it happened, it was good. you , for example, there, well, the current situation does not divide you, well, you don’t argue there, but not our situations. i hope that both sasha and all my children. sasha is the oldest. uh, brought up the same way, even if i liked it there, and i would actually find an opportunity. yes, there, as it were, to move, and so on and so forth , the question would not arise for me. for whom am i, for my homeland, for the soviet union, to which i took an oath in the 85th year of the armed forces? or am i where i am satisfying or good? no, the question is not worth it. if you were brought up correctly, you cannot change your homeland or stand up against your homeland. if suddenly because of some slogans? this is the main thing

. >> jimmy: you never went to nyu. >> all of these famous people, they cut in line.kat aubrey plaza. i was on an improv team with moynahan. >> jimmy: was it hard for you knowing that you taught these people and they've gone on to big things? >> i did not get invited to 30 rock. my impressions were terrible. at first i chose daphne, who a broadway star. i would never play her. no sketch would be about her. i did daphne vega she kind of sings like this. then i did it right wing schneider. i thought it was very funny. i am not on the show. he is not super finger on the pulse of pop culture. i should have done john mcc john mccain. >> jimmy: i feel he is unmistakable and forever we will know that voice >> it is a thin line between me and fred schneider. my big break about three months ago. i was on a show on mtv where ranked people. it was a terrible thing to do. i was in a movie called ghost town. >> jimmy: they should really all be naked because your clothing doesn't die. did you know bridget everett before? >> i don't think i had her number in my phone, but i did know

it was so many identities to choose from like nyu graduate georgie. >> give me my diploma!ing it on my resume anyway! >> broadway producer georgie! >> didn't the musical soccer? >> no >> have you ever played volleyball? >> lady, i invented volleyball. >> creepy orphan georgie. >> my mom died in 9/11. >> georgie, come for dinner. >> don't forget, jewish georgie appeared >> my grandparents survived the holocaust >> collect them all! brain surgeon georgie, mermaid georgie, magician georgie, ballerina georgie, g.i. georgie, and so many different lies he's bound to tell. it's a georgie orgy >> totally unreliable, liable georgie. >> jimmy: there you go. [cheers and applause] can you believe all this is going on? >> yeah, jimmy, this is great. if you had a lot of tequila's today to i'm really happy, hopefully they put him in jail next week. >> jimmy: how many shots? >> today's a special day so four. >> jimmy: we've got a good show tonight and hopefully no security issues because we are ill-equipped to deal with them. from "ted lasso," brett goldstein is with us! and will be back w

marc siegel, fox news contributor and professor of medicine at nyu langone medical center. we were talking yesterday and more information has come forth. i want to start with the science. what was the exact science, the truth about lockdowns? >> well first of all, you know, physicians were on the front lines. we were on the covid wards and my office reopened in may of 2020. i call myself an essential worker. i call teachers essential workers. so right off the bat i questioned and continue to question why teachers weren't on the front lines when doctors and nurses were. and the second point really importantly is studies started coming out in 2020 in wisconsin, in north carolina, in europe, big studies that showed that you got much more spread of covid by putting kids at home. what do you think they did at home? spread viruses. if you put them in a school setting open a window, do testing. pi kids go to private school. that school was open and testing sending kids home once they got sick. randi weingarten is a disgrace. the american rescue plan gave 122 billion to schools. a

>> well, i look at that study, gillian, and a senior author from nyu and looking at brain tumors and the mutations that would lead you to think it's a more severe outcome and about 90% accurate and i think it's good from the point of view of let's use a.i. as a tool to help doctors, now another study just came out of stanford and ucla that basically looked at the heart and said that a.i, can do a slightly better job than cardiologists telling you how well your heart is pumping and another study out of the united kingdom looked at stem cells and who is going to get cancer and who isn't. all of that i like, and like looking at the retina of the eye and use patterns from thousands or millions of other patients to say who is going to get cancer, who is going to get high blood pressure, diabetes, that's a.i. as a tool. here is what i don't like. nature journal just did a big study out of george washington university, went inside the operating room and evaluated urologists and said you are deviating from the standard, and can you imagine a computer voice telling you warning, warning, warni

gary marcus, a professor at nyu.e book "rebooting ai, building artificial intelligence we can trust." good to see you. so even though there is a lot of anxiety and fear about artificial intelligence, systems like we just saw are some of the positive applications of ai. would you agree? >> yeah. there are lots of positive applications. there are things we should worry about, but this is not one that goes after individual people based on limited data. people collect data over time. even though there are limits to the ai, there's a chance to fix them. this was an application that i liked. >> i wonder if you like this application. this week the republican national committee responded to president biden's reelection announcement with this ai generated video. take a look. >> my fellow americans. ♪ >> this morning an emboldened china invades taiwan. >> financial markets are in free fall as 500 regional banks have shuttered their doors. >> border agents were overrun by a surge of 80,000 illegals yesterday evening. >> what ar

be singled ou for immunity as the leader and the same thing i mar-a-lago - we did a whole study at nyund tapin classified documents and unlawfully retaining them an obstructing is prosecuted. and people who have done far less than with the forme president appears to have done would all face prosecution >> yeah. and there's some nuggets emerging from jack smith's investigation to that part o the story, having to do with those documents and perhaps th motive for them. this is in the new york times. federal investigators ar asking witnesses whether forme president donald j trump showe off to aides and visitors a ma he took with him when he lef office that contains sensitive intelligence information for people who - you think this - it's sort of dazzling detail and somewhat comical and we are, perverse way but do you think there's legal significance to that line of question >> yes it is not necessarily for criminal case to sho dissemination. you can be charged wit intentionally taking governmen documents without disseminatin thereafter and the same thin you can unlawfully retai classified

discussion right now let's welcome in cnbc's tech correspondent steve covac, along with arun sandranjun nyu school of business, and the managing director with roth mkm, he has a buy rating on alphabet and $126 price target so thank you, gentlemen, for being here right now steve, start with you with the bigger picture story about how important a.i. is. >> right. >> to microsoft and amazon and every other -- >> important to everyone if you listen to sundar pichai. it's important to every company is going to be using this, one of the fascinating things in that "60 minutes" interview. what struck me what we're seeing between microsoft and google, they're warning before they start breaking things. this is coming with social media and youtube and misinformation we've been grappling with for so many years they apologize after the fact, after they start asking for regulation, now they're asking for regulation before they can fully launch these products at the same time, dom, we haven't seen our congress pass laws for child safety online if they can't do that, there's like little appetite to regulat

. >> a legal expert from nyu school of law, saying if it comes from a person, not a corporation or business, it was personal hospitality, and did not need to report it. if you're going to change the rules for the supreme court, by which the justices are required to obey, does congress do that? when was the last time that happened? republicans leading the court, leading a majority in the house. is this the time to do that or would it be considered unlikely? >> the last few months they've updated the protocols for how they have to report things. listen, congress always wants to get involved with the judicial branch in a situation like this, because they do control funding for the judicial branch. that's when you have the hearings each year, they ask for the allotment they need for the judicial branch, that members will talk about things they want, you know, like maybe changes these laws, these rules, ethics canons, things like that. they have ways to control the pocketbook and control the process. >> what's coming up sunday? >> senator bob cardin and from the other side of the aisle, senator

genera counsel and former chief of th criminal division -- in new york, he is professor o practice in nyuking abou what donald trump did with documents while he was still president, and that is how trustee chose to answer it the question, of course, i what was he doing with them in florida, and how many of the was he personally handling after he was president, and oh by the way, and this questio wasn't asked by anyone who interviewed any trump lawyer how did that classifie document to get in his desk, i his desk drawer? whose hand put that there? >> so, maybe the way to star i for everyone to understand tha every criminal defendant including donald trump, has sixth amendment right to counsel that is, it's in the constitutional - zealous advocacy and frankly, if you can' afford one, the supreme cour has had this state will pay fo that so that is the baseline. and it is important to kno that people have a job to do but lawrence, you are totall right that there is difference between what you se mr. tacopina or mr. trusty doing and essentially spinning out things that are clearl false, so why

joining us now in the his first interview since the filing on friday, nyu economics professor nourielbini, aka, dr. doom. he's here in a fox business exclusive. great to see you. first republic says it's just being financially smart, but what does that move tell you about the state of u.s. banking right now? >> well, it tells me that not just first republic, but also for many other regional banks their business model right now is severely challenged. they have a narrow deposit base, they have a large amount of uninsureed deposits, and now people are realizing that they can earn, say, 4-5% on money market t-bills that are insured by the government. when they get close to 0 on their policies. so that's the source of the mental problem and, therefore, these banking problems are going to continue for these region regional banks. liz: what about contagion? do you see any spreading of these real problems among the bigger names? >> well, the bigger names have a wider deposit base, they have less losses of their deposits. i think a lot of the depositor orses moved to the large money center ba

and i'd gone to an army recruiter that had no idea what to do with a 24 year old graduate student, nyu in fiction writing, if he had had a better pitch the week after 911, i would have probably end in the military, but they hadn't adjusted. yet they're like, you could learn how to be a computer scientist in the military. and i was like, no, that's all right. so i moved down to d.c. and i really wanted to be a part i was really rooting for george bush. i was stirred by his speeches. i read about this. and in the kind of cause of, you know, america's next great challenge, iraq. i got mugged by that reality because. i remember being like, well, iraq seems like weird response to 911 and but then all these people i admired and colin powell most profoundly, like we must do this, you know, and all people that knew better than me, just some 24 year old, they all were for this war. and when that went so badly, i was like, wait a second, maybe people don't know what they're talking about. and and meanwhile, there is obama and i got on the obama train really in that senate campaign because he gav

nyu professor scott galloway. the author of the book adrift, and host of the professor g podcast. thank you so much for being here. what do you make of the fact that there is this bipartisan bill seeking to impose an age requirement to access for social media? >> well, i think it is good news. governments are supposed to prevent a tragedy to bring us together and represent the public. and i think it is heartening to see this. quite frankly, it is overdue. this has been as you mentioned, going on since 20 level. my colleague has basically found that it is causational. he found that social media was in fact had a big r coefficient. what was most stunning in his research was that he found that the levels of depression which sort of increased naturally or hit natural levels even through covid. and that's the ultimate catalyst for social distancing, it was social media, not covid. so i hope this happens. the s.e.c. for the finance industry, the fda for the food and pharmaceutical industry. we literally have no regulation across an industry where now one in five tenth graders are spendi

former chief of th criminal division in the eastern district of new york he's a professor of practice a nyu law school and an msnb legal analysts catherine christian, let m just begin with you, and wha we're seeing in this correspondence is that thi unprecedented correspondence that the district attorney office is engaging in. very much to my amusement so far, where we have at leas this confirmation from them an writing that we are talkin about multiple, multiple crime that will be charged when we see this on tuesday. what are you expecting, give everything we know at this point, do you have a expectation of what we will se on tuesday when these charge are revealed >> you know, i do not want t speculate. if the indictment is an appeal i think -- 30 counts, but, you know, don't want to speculate. i have no idea i don't think there are thre counts of falsifying busines records, but it is, you know i've had discussion with som lawyer friends of mine fro prosecutors, we were sort of speculating that, maybe, you know, there might be some ta fraud involved, but again, having not seen it, i don' w

former chief of th criminal division in the eastern district of new york he's a professor of practice a nyu law school an msnbc legal asset give us your read on wednesday this year, do you think that brad is going to be able t shut down jim jordan's attempt to meddle in this prosecution? >> and he's going to be a clos call, let me give you a little bit of a legal side, and the factual side legally, you have for congress the law is generally ver heavily skewed in favor of congressional power, and being able to issue subpoenas if the legislation that could be ha on the subject that's a very low standard because congress has generally very broad power however, the reason that it is a complicated, tough issue, an a close call, is what da bragg is saying here, those concerns what do you have to do with th local prosecution? number two, you're seeking privileged information about what is going on three, you're interfering with an ongoing criminal case, in other words, even if you hav some concern that congress could be entitled to information, why do you need i now? can you not wait for it if you

fb general counsel and former chief of the -- district of ne york, he is a professor of practice and nyu law school an an msnbc legal analyst congressman goldman, first, to the so-called field hearin that is going to be schedule for the javits federal building, on monday, is that open to the public, that hearing >> i don't know the answer t that. i don't know whether i will be televised or open to the public. i assume both. certainly the chairman is doin this purely as a political stunt and i would imagine he would like as much attention o it for that reason as possible but it is purely just that lawrence, and i think that the district attorney brags lawsui put a real cherry on the top o some of these arguments, that have also been making, which i that jim jordan is acting at the behest of donald trump, an this lawsuit will be a mechanism through which th district attorney bragg can ge information and documents an material about how muc collusion and coordination there has been between donal trump, his legal team, and jim jordan and other house republicans. in a way that the would not ha

former chief of criminal division in the easter district of new york he's the professor of practice at nyu law school. also is neil catchall, actin solicitor general. both msnbc legal analysts. andrew, i want to begin with the last point that i mentioned, and tie it back to the first point. there's a report of grange testimony about donald trump asking about seizing votin machines there is also the fact that we now know mike pence is going t testify to the grand jury. it seems that the penc testimony could be a lot mor important than this voting machine testimony, depending o what that testimony is if it is donald trump asking can we seize voting machines and he's told that you can't no matter how much yelling i involved, there might not be any crime in asking those kind of questions, compared to what donald trump was asking th vice president to do >> yes, so i agree with yo that [inaudible] >> it could be more prominent. the reports are that [inaudible >> this could just be one of many in his own administration his people, saying that what you are trying to convince u of didn't happen, an

researchers from new york university nyu say specific cells typically mature to give hair its color. but as time goes by, these cells can get stuck and stop their progression to be able to give color. and that is when hair starts to turn gray. now researchers are trying to further look into whether the strap cells can be reversed, which could start creating color for hair again. you know that commercial we're hairdresser knows for sure. a quick funny story. i was volunteering at the kids school last tuesday. we can bring pam and ken and for this. >> and, you know, not getting paid hearing. yeah, this kid comes up to as a grad. do you your gray hair? yes. i said you had its second in great. the vendor little wasn't your son? no, okay. no. be. well, i mean, it's not like my kids always his than it is getting greater. he says. so just noticed there's here with what it's crazy. they shut everything. vicky, what can we we say? racket on that note. thank you thank you. here's what we're working on. continue to follow the latest. >> in the 80's parent exodus from oakland. why the mayor of o

doctor holly lofton, is the director of the medical weight management program at the nyu school of medicinen investigator for separate obesity study, funded in part by eli lilly, how big a deal is this? >> this is what we call a game-changer in regards to a lot of some type two diabetes, we know it's hard for these types of patients to lose this type of, wait and the study has demonstrated significant weight loss in the populations. >> may lead to folks without diabetes getting some benefit. >> we've got a separate study, eli lately has been looking at is about to tide, for patients without tech to buy diabetes, and they actually lost more weight. so it's promising for both populations. >> one of the side effects? >> side effects have to do with the mechanism, because these are medications that look just like hormones that are made in our got, they cause got related side effects such as nausea, vomiting diarrhea, but overall the benefits are much greater than those risks. as reading about the trial obviously not having your expertise if i'm right the placebo group also lost weight. >> so th

earlier this month on washington journal professor noah krawcheck, a member of the nyu center for opioid epidemiology and policy offered her explanation of why fentanyl became more available during the covid pandemic. here is what she said. >> there are a few different reasons. the way that the illicit drug market works is when there is disruptions to a drug supply, but there is still demand, still a lot of people who have opioid addictions or use disorder, the medical time that we call it, people will continue to seek out opioids. what happened during the pandemic is there was a lot of disruption and drug supply networks. just like there was disruption of supply of everything during the covid pandemic. fentanyl became an alternative that is cheaper, because it is more potent it is easier to mix in. you need lower doses of it. that is why we are seeing increases in fentanyl availability. importantly, also, when we tried to crack down on certain types of drugs in our drug supply, that often leads to the emergence of new drugs. that is what we saw in terms of the emergence of fentanyl as f

my colleague at nyu jonathan has basically found that it is no longer just correlation, but it is causation, he controlled for the other causes of depression. and found that social media was in fact, you know, had a big correlation -- what was most stunning in his research, michael, was that he found that the levels of depression which increased naturally or hit natural levels, even through covid. and that is the ultimate catalyst for social distancing, social media. not covid. so i think it is heartening. i hope it happens. it will be the first legislation against big tech. think about this, you have the s cc for the finance industry, the fda for the food and pharmaceutical industry. we literally have no regulation across an industry where now at one in five tenth graders are spending seven hours a day, and as you referenced, appears to be the increasing cause of harm and depression among our most valuable resource. our teens. >> i heard bill maher addressed this subject recently. it might have been the night that you were on most recently. and in a word, he referred to it as mingling. we

pulitzer prize-winning justic department reporter for the ne york times and professor melissa murray o nyu is the doj asking for i today's appeal what do we need to know? >> they're asking for th intermediate appellate court that judge kacsmaryk directl is right under, they're asking the appeals court to essentially stay judge kacsmaryk ruling so doesn't go into effect, so this can basically allow their appeal process to review all of the agency indications and all o their studies to make sure tha they can comply with thi process. so, it is essentially asking for the agency rebuke proces to be allowed to play out. and again, the first circuit has a lot of different options here it doesn't actually have t take up this decision in the seven days that were allotte by judge kacsmaryk they can actually just let the clock run out. and that will of course te this up to go to the supreme court, if the supreme court di nothing and this went into effect on friday, as it is planned to do. >> katie, 200 different bio fo groups signed an open letter blasting this decision with this change an entire ind

holly lofton is the director of the medical weight management program at the nyu school of medicine andhis is a game changer with regards to weight loss or patients with type 2 diabetes. it's harder for these patients to lose as much weight and this study has demonstrated significant weight loss in this population. >> may it lead to folks without diabetes who nevertheless are obese getting some benefit? >> we have done a separate study, eli lilly has lacked at patients with same meditation, tirzepatide, without type 2 diabetes and they lost more weight than the second trial. it's promising for both populations. >> what are the side effects? >> it has to do with the mechanism. because these are medications that look just like hormones we make in our gut, they cause gut-related side effects such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea. overall, the benefits are greater than those risks. >> i read about the trial. obviously, not having your expertise. but if i'm right, the placebo group also lost weight. >> yeah, so that's something to be said for the benefit of diet, exercise and behaviors. we are

former chief of the criminal decision in the easter district of new york he's a professor of practice a nyu law school they're both msnbc legal analysts and joining us is dan horwitz, he's a former manhatta assistant district attorney. all right, andrew weissmann, let me begin with you and what we saw in the judges ruling so far which seems to apply a this stage only till tomorrow' arraignment, no cameras in the courtroom, no electronic devices, no live tweeting. cameras allowed in the hallway essentially, this seems to b the way the same judge handled the allen weisselber prosecution. >> yes, the judge has a lot of discretion as to what he i going to allow and this was a little bit more than i expected because he i allowed some cameras, as rache and you discussed at the opening, at least the very beginning. and i agree with you that it may not be what he does for th trial. he may allow that live tweetin if it's used without the camer function i think he wants to protec people for safety. there is a question of the dignity of the proceeding. so i think it was well withi his discretion as da

former chief of th criminal division in the eastern district of new york he is a professor of practic at nyubeing with us tell me, you can start anywher you want with this thing, bu there are sort of thre distinct elements here the one that we are stil concentrating on is fani willis, who has sent out a message t law enforcement in georgia t say that there is a court term that starts on july 11th between that and a particula date in september, she is goin to, i don't know how to word it, she will have something that they might want to prepare for >> so, very, very -- over 20 years of being in th department of justice, anytime that someone announced a tim period during which they wil make a decision. but that is what she has done. i strongly suspect that it is way of dealing with the fact that she did say in court in january to the judge overseein the special grand jury that wa doing some of the investigation, that is not the indictin grandeur but she said the to the judge overseeing that gran jury that charges and th decision on charges would be made eminently, and that clearly is a word tha

, msnb contributor miss summary she is greystone's professor o law and back - leadership network at nyu. melissa, what would it loo like for the supreme court t take the abortion pill cases and how soon can that happen >> i think this is on a fast rocket to the supreme court. there is no way this doesn't g to the supreme court eventually right now, the judge's rulin is going to appeal to the fift circuit. it's a famously conservative court but that court doesn't have to do anything. judge casts a mare issued seven-day stay seven days before his stat goes into effect the fifth circuit set on thi for seven days and that woul really put this in the questio of whether goes to the supreme court. i think the fda would have t seek approval at the supreme court. they could ask which - has happened before. get the supreme court to tak this up to resolve the conflic between the washington injunction and this texa decision again issued by a single judge in texas, but a nationwide decision that would basically imperil all of mifepristone accessibility across the country >> the composition of this c

. >> that was nyu associat professor of journalism, jay rosen, talking about the state of fox news ont has changed since then last week fox settled it defamation case with dominio voting systems for almost 80 million box, and just yesterda the company said it was partin ways with tucker carlson, it's top rated host i am glad to welcome j. back t the 11th hour. so much has changed since even i spoke in february. what is your biggest take away over the last couple of weeks? >> about the trial especially, there was a moment, stephanie, when a kind of accountabilit returned to fox, where it ha to face reality that normall we can just dispense with. a good example is when the judge ruled that you will no be allowed to say that maybe some of these crazy charge against dominion are not reall true you cannot do that during that broadcast day, fox can do anything it wants the return of a kind of, mor of a flicker of accountability is, i think, what caused the to settle for 800 and $8 million. >> tucker is gone an historically speaking, when fo news has parted ways with bi hosts and personality

trump nation, the art o being the donald andrew weizmann who is bee here all day long, law professor at nyu and former senior member of th mueller probe. and charles joins us, -- david joining us remotely in the new york times investigative reporter who won a pulitzer for the truth behin donald trump's charitabl donations. andrew, how stronger these charges and if donald trump is found guilty, what are the consequences >> so on the strength of the charge, the one thing that w don't know is we don't actuall know all of the proof behind it but that, they were surprising to me into ways. one, michael paul cohen an everyone says so, that was the star witness, when you read th actual statement of facts yo actually find that he is a player, but you don't sit ther and go he is central david pecker plays a huge role and if i were the government, would say in the trial, it i the star witness, th documents. >> which is what lanny davis michael cohen's lawyer has bee telling us for days. >> absolutely, that is not a credit to his client, but hi crowd -- is client is a difficult witness to put off but

. >> all right, let's bring an nyu law professor melissa murray. you just saw the house resolution failed. melissa, what is your reaction to what we see going on in nashville right now, above and beyond the tragedy of another state not adequately handling gun violence. even these votes and this process, what is your first reaction? >> i think it is heartening that she had this response. at least some of her colleagues seem to be concerned about what she is saying. it will be telling if they see the same response on the take-up the vote for representative person who is a very different kind of legislature from miss johnson. we're talking about this as though it's just an artifact of the tennessee legislature. this goes all the way to the supreme court. you don't get a legislature this gerrymandered for 72 of the legislators, over 25 of the legislators can vote to expel a fellow colleague simply for speaking his mind and reflecting the views of his constituents without the partisan gerrymandering that this horse has blessed in decisions like russo ve

she is a - of law and faculty director -- at nyu melissa, what would it loo like for the supreme court t take up the abortion cases and how soon could that happen >> well, alicia, i think thi is on a staff rocker to th supreme court. i think there's no way thi couldn't go to the supreme court eventually right now, judge kacsmaryk's ruling it has been an appeal t the fifth circuit. it is a famously conservativ court. but that court doesn't actuall have to do anything. judge has merrick issued a seven-day stay, so it is seven days before his state actually goes into effect the circuit just sit on this for seven days, and that would really put this in the questio of whether it goes to th supreme court. i think the fda would have t seek approval at the supreme court. they could ask for - which this happened before basically get the supreme cour to take this up to resolve a conflict between the washingto injunction and this toxic' decision again issued by a single judge in texas. but nationwide decision that would basically imperil all of mississippi are ston accessibility across the countr