the prior tax increment and balances from say mission bay, are restricted from the agreement, or etc. and there are, depending on where it came from, there are restrictions, and then, the other is or has a variety of sources and so, i would say, it is a lot of developer payments, and so, for instance, in the shipyard, you know, the depositers and reimbursing or in transbay, the developer is making the payments that will be used for the affordable housing through a payment, from them verses using the property tax and that is what in that category as well as the state and federal grants as well. >> they are just lumped altogether. anything that is not prompt property tax is not reserved in the bonds. >> okay. >> thank you. >> okay. >> i mean, this is a pretty thorough and i know that the over site board will have the more specific questions because they are going to go line by line. nothing jumped out to me and i definitely bring it up to somebody if it does and does anyone have any? >> i don't have a question, but, i again, i am intrigued to see or perhaps understand and maybe this is

powerful words to say less at first now he's using much more many more words inappropriate metaphors or etc thinking he has that old magic and he really does it well let's break down one of his most recent speeches the u.n. g.a. and. we deeply believe it is in our interests to see a middle east and north africa that is peaceful and prosperous. and will continue to promote democracy and human rights and open markets because we believe these practices achieve peace and prosperity. ok so let's break down the speaking style here he's using very deliberate words his words are followed by these long pauses after he makes kind of that and poncho he's also using a lot of firm hand gestures when speaking i mean what is he trying to do here with this well he's been he's trying to do two things first of all he's trying to convey this message almost interpersonally like he's talking to somebody but talking to them very forcefully not trying to overpower them but reaffirm you know basic norms and basic paradigms that everybody can get on board with that's one but the other thing he's trying to do is kin

to vote just because the president happens to be a democrat or republican or, etc. it's a vote of consciousness and what you think is the right thing to do so you can sleep at night. now you give the president of the united states, you give him a head start because you believe--i believe that the president of the united states wants to do the right thing for the united states, and he's not one who is trying to hurry in into war. i start at that premise. he has a head start because he is the president of the united states, and he may have more information than i have, but it's my job to seek for as much of it as i can get so i can make a decision. even if my co constituents disae with them, i should be able to explain to them why i voted yes or no. >> the big concern is whether this is an unilateral effort. the u.s. cannot go it alone. he wants to see more worldwide support. but the congress has no control over that. >> let's talk about the senate vote, any surprises? >> well, we didn't see things break down along party lines, nor did we expect to, but some members w

mindset of stability and doesn't take the risks in terms of the right spending or efficiency or investment policies etc then you know we'll end up in this low growth environment for far too long when we clearly need initiatives to drag up investments on the radio and sometimes those decisions are painful as in any economy and i get in that becomes a political issue here it does have a point in many ways in looking at you know you know making stability the be all and end all of everything in doesn't necessarily create growth and he was right in two thousand and eight mr calderon was right there because. if russia spent all of its oil windfall at the time to develop some big projects and lost a lot of the money at the time the economy would be very overheated and going into the crisis. there would be a tremendous correction even greater than the one we had in two thousand and eight two thousand and three all really quite minor compared to what happened in western developed countries and which was certainly far more smooth i would say interims of the social implications for the wider strata of the populat

probably tried to get a job with clothes on and failed and really needed to feed their family or pay student loans etc>>at least they are doing something and aren't jobless. >> pam: starbucks will tell customers that guns are no longer welcome. the company is not instituting a ban but not instituting a ban but well, but levine the fact that customers with guns can still be served but just requesting that they do not bring guns into the cafe. >> i un believe that they should refrain from bringing guns and the cafe at cannot believe there'll be a reason to do >> it is kind of faint grey area we should have the right to bear arms sell as the company has a seat 0 of a company has the list licensees to make sure that his employees are safe. >> pam: corporate responsibility opened a letter offering to ben pence the new town shouting did not prompt this new policy >> pam: it's a disturbing story. >> pam: a massachusetts man who chatted online with other men about their desire to kidnap, rape, kill and eat children. has been sentenced. >> pam: photos of a basement dungeon geoffrey portway built. a child-sized

. >> was there a point or historical moment where government business etc. eem to move away or lose its obligation towards a whole unfair society? >> you know i began the book in 1978. for arbitrary reasons it's when one i graduated from high school prop 15 passed in california which i think is a signal event in beginning to dissolve the glue that held together public institutions. another thing that happened in 78 is throughout the 70s with all the economic appeals at that time businesses began to feel that they could no longer afford to play ball with government and labor the way they had throughout that post-war era of business labor cooperation and they began to spend money on lobbying in washington in a big way. there were a few bills that came up in congress that year. carter was president and the democrats controlled both houses. the bills were all defeated including a reform bill because businesses lobbied so heavily against them. douglas frazier who was the head of uaw then, quit president carter's business labor council and wrote an interesting lett

moving in and bringing with them a different set of ideological preferences and issue preferences, etc., or are those shifts occurring because people who have lived in those areas for a while are changing their minds, or they are looking at the political landscape, looking at politics at the national level in congress, and they are changing their mind when it comes to issues such as global warming, when it comes to issues such as gay marriage and abortion. i will leave you with those questions and turn the microphone over to elizabeth. >> i suggest that maybe we sort of throw it open -- >> what we will do now is let the panel take a look, the three of you, and, elizabeth, you could start this, to look at what your reactions are to this, and then anybody else on the panel to look at it. i will start with elizabeth because we talked about loudoun county. yesterday i went out to the rural parts of loudoun county, bluemont. this is as far west as you could go. it used to be horse country. the bluemont arts festival was there, and when looking at the parking lot, there were far more beemers than

etc. under the 229 or so spade trade marks, about 70 or so are related to kate spade and various variations of kate spade including kate spade saturday and then there are about 25 or so for jack spade. there are more than a hundred spade trademarks that are unrelated. when reviewing this and when determining this and i did have a conversation with the appellant the other day and discussed the meaning of the planning code and we did go through some hypotheticals. i agree with all the representation made to the board and i did express very clearly that we are not dealing with hypotheticals in the case and the facts that we have are that there are at this point 10 jack spade stores in the u.s.. there are kate spade stores, but with the jack and kate spade trademark there are 10. this would be their 11th establishment. subsequent to the establishment, if we would say that you have 11 or more other establishments, you are formula retail. but at this point, it's my opinion and reading the planning code and interpreting the planning code that they are not formula retail. i would note, there are ot

marines or the german army, etc., could never sustain those rates of casualties, and those rates approach rates that we took in vietnam at times. but i think that the ability to take casualties is directly related to the political object to be achieved. and for the afghans, i think that's significant. for them, they are fighting for their country. they're fighting for the very existence of their future. and i don't -- of the, there's 4 maneuver brigades out here. there's over a hundred kandaks, and there hasn't been a ingle unit, police or -- single unit, police or army, that has shattered, lost their cohesion, lost their ability to carry on the fight as a result of casualties. i think that speaks sol -- volumes about their cohesion and their willingness to defend their own country. and i think they are fully cognizant of the fact that the enemy they are fighting wants to take over their country. and they are fully aware that if they fail in their fight, they will live under taliban rule again. so they are determined, and i've seen it over and over and over again throughout the last four

a one-point difference or a two two-point difference nationwide in big cities or in urban suburbs, etc., that's magnified especially when we're dealing with a nation that michael barone a few years ago talked about a 49-49 nation or 48-48 nation. we live in a nation that's close to being 50-50, so gaining one or two percentage points across the board can actually make a huge impact nationwide. >> let's start with a question over here. please tell us who you are. >> i'm brian. i'm an undergraduate student here. i have a question -- >> thanks, brian. >> -- that relates to voter turn out in these urban areas, possibly could be an obama effect, but i'm wondering given a growing population, are we seeing an increase in voter turnout, or is it staying level? people are just changing the way they vote? >> you know, we haven't looked directly at turnout. i mean, i've looked at it a little bit just comparing it, just looking at the raw numbers over time, i have not compared turnout. my guess is, actually -- the one thing about turnout is it varies so much election to election, i'd be really car

without a personal computer, cell phone, color tv much less satellite or hd, the internet, air-conditioning, modern medicine, wal-mart, etc.. there for the middle class is much better off today. >> i did a lot of people were listening to this and say how can the middle class be a rauf than they were? this face it the last four or five years have been tough on the middle class. the economy hasn't done very well the middle class middle to the comedian has fallen by $3,000 since the recession began said this has been a tough time for the middle class. absolutely. i'm talking about if you compare the same thing the middle class has access to today versus 25 years ago there is no comparison. all those things you mentioned, the computer, the cell phone, the ipad. it's a modern treatment. let me give you one example in medicine. it the plant from 30 years ago you would have been diagnosed with cancer but the factor is essentially handing you a death certificate. today we have high survival rates. the same for heart disease and so many other ailments. look what has happened with aids. we reduced the rate by 90% in 25 years. that

keep in mind durable-goods after three years or more, dishwashers, cars, etc.ders the new debt limit deadline is october 17th. less than $30 billion on hand to hit the nation's built. in a letter sent to congress peer the immediate action, raise the debt limit, give me a blank check. that is what the president wants. back in a moment. stuart: j.c. penney shares hitting new lows. nicole: it is broken down below $10. at one point at nine dollars and $0.93 a share down 14% today, 20% this week and these are the lowest levels we have seen in 12 years. j.c. penney shareholder not happy. stuart: i am not surprised. at one point it was not intended as bounced back a little bit. thanks very much. we have been saying tech rules in part because it allows you to spend money much more easily. how much? listen to this. smart phones expected to influence $66 billion of holiday spending this year. let's straighten this out. you are saying an extra $66 billion worth of commerce will flow through smart phones this holiday season? >> right. that makes sense. if you look that las

meaning the white has white house had a chance to massage it had it edited ok here's the etc it didn't hold up to scrutiny or apparently the military got to the president and i see some evidence of this next thing we know the president has changed his mind on saturday afternoon and the only thing that really intervened was the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff martin dempsey telling the president look you know it's going to be really hard as we're going to be really hard to explain what we have to do this now we could do this tomorrow or next week or next month we don't really have to do it now and the president said that in justifying his delay now what's more evidence lindsey graham and john mccain the next day just took off after the joint chiefs of staff chairman in a very personal and vindictive way because they know that finally the military leaders went to the president said look you know we know we know you're being told that this is going to be easy and limit all this stuff but these guys and these gals don't know a thing about war we do how do you think the congressional votes going to play out

going to last, these days, most turkish laborer stays in the country or goes into the neighborhood with turkish companies to work on , etc., andn projects would be able to establish a link between the and thisnion particular development. response, uri, to you is that i do believe there is a major transformation that is taking place. look at turkey, and i look at turkey historically, and from my point of view, and there you can turn around and point the finger at me as a member of a particular i see a majory, historical connection that has been there for centuries, and one cannot just wash one's hands of it. and when i talk to business people, including business people that may not directly be associated with what you call theyecular middle class, do give importance to the rule and to transparency and to accountability, and the last two months since the events and the way in which the government has come hard on some of the businesses, noises have been coming out from those business circles, two. i think in turkey, in successful business circles, there is a craving for the rule of law, for a level field, and as far as i c

etc., are around the world. there's no shortage of either academic studies or people studying against it. where we are missing is a constructive vision of a better way. now america needs that in a whole lot of other areas. the conservative movement at large is largely a reactionary and has no powerful constructive vision of a way forward. and so there i think it would be part of sharing with such a vision should be. and you are ideally placed with your academic credentials and your great heritage of religious freedom to make such a contribution. >> a constructive vision of a better way. that is what dr. os guiness, born in china, living his life both in the u.k. now for the last 30 years in the united states and his call house then for both sides of the atlantic and now for the entire globe to come to terms with living with our deepest differences. a lot of us learned that our mothers or fathers need the golden rule. do unto others as you would have them do unto you. and one of the things that he is saying in this very important book to all of us is we need to respect one another and resp

or lay out the plans. it gives the public a chance to do something they don't have the right to appeal. we're asking for one small hearing process very parallel to the dr hearings etc. and with regard to the planning staff saying that this is not been a historical issue well, it isn't because the appeal process one way or another, wasn't appealable. in the past appeals were possible. so a final point is occasionally especially around historic buildings may want to have to go to court. and to go to court they need to have a public record a hearing. so i have to give them the tools they need to follow up in the rare cases that might be something to go to court. we really need your support on this we're concerned about keeping the character of our city and a dealing with the rare cases where the beginning conception there might have been a modification yes. we've tried to narrow down the discretion to make it clear to everybody knows more clearly but we need this hearing thank you. >> thank you (calling names). >> good morning commissioners. i'm the chair of the ocean land use and housing committee. i'm here today to ska ask you a personal thing. there have been 3 att

moving in and bringing with them a different set of ideological preferences and issue preferences, etc., or are those shifts occurring because people who have lived in those areas for a while are changing their minds, or they are looking at the political landscape, looking at politics at the national level in congress, and they are changing their mind when it comes to issues such as global warming, when it comes to issues such as gay marriage and abortion. i will leave you with those questions and turn the micropho ne over to elizabeth. >> i suggest that maybe we sort of throwing open -- >> what we will do now is let the panel take a look, the three of you, and, elizabeth, you could start this, to look at what your reactions are to this, and then anybody else on the panel to look at it. i will start with elizabeth because we talked about loud and county. i -- yesterday i went out to the rural parts of loudoun county, newmont. this is as far west as you could go. it used to be course country and pickup trucks -- it used to be horse country. arts festival was there, and when looking at the pa

laptop wireless routers cameras etc none of the radiation these devices invented has been quantified or qualified but it's something that's of around us all the time now we're living in a radiation field world so it might be time for us to think about protecting ourselves because no one else is going to if you're an android device user you can use a mobile app called and eight which is built to protect you from harmful low grade electromagnetic radiation it only costs ninety nine cents and uses technology to deflect the radiation if you're one of those people who use a laptop on your lab a company called defender pad has developed a product for you it's a pad if you put between your lap and your laptop and it blocks both radio frequency and low frequency radiation it costs eighty nine ninety nine but considering the organs that happen to be around your lap it might be worth it. but it's hard to create a barrier between you and every single device that might be in meeting radiation so perhaps the best way to protect yourself. if by ingesting naturally protective substances bentonite clay

they don't develop themselves or don't pay to have developed directly or exclusively for netflix but really broad movies, tv shows, etcy're doing is building out kind of an, if you will, hbo element to the story. they'll have original contempt, and there's about five shows they already have now and they're adding probably another one or two series each and every quarter. some of them will be repeats. but the economics on that since they're keeping it relatively small as a percentage of overall business don't change the margins. we expect margins to rise for at least the next two years. ashley: what concerns you, what's out there, mark, that you think could derail this growth that we've seen? >> i think plenty of things. first, remember what cracked the stock two years ago was really management hubris. so that could happen again. management team, although i think in the grand scale of history, this management team has gotten two fundamental technology shifts right. competitive risk. amazon has an interesting service in the market. hbo go, hulu, maybe long term apple or google do something. third thing is it's very unce

or to turn a blind eye. while we -- while we need to be mod etc. in our belief that we can remedy every evil, while we need to be mindful that the world is full of unintended consequences should we accept the notion that the world is powerless in the face of a rwanda? if that's the world that people want to live in, they should say so and reckon with the cold lodge exof mass graves. but i believe we can embreas a different future. if we don't want to choose between enaction and war, we must get better, all of us, at the policies that prevent the breakdown of basic work to respect the responsibilities of nations and the rights of individuals. through meaningful sanctions for those who break the rules. through dogged diplomacy that resolves the root causes of conflict, not merely its aftermath. through development assistance that brings hope to the mar generalalized. and yet sometimes, though this will not be enough, there are going to be moments where the international community will need to acknowledge that the multilateral use of military force ma

you know how far west laws to death penalty etc i guess is every single day from people saying how could you live in moscow the reality is that if two tourists or americans come to moscow if they have come in say the sense just like they will in any other country they will be safe the whole picture is absolutely exaggerated it's not what they report is absolutely not true what they're saying is that basically everyone is being killed on the streets here. i mean i want to say i mean we i want what we want to say i'm here i mean i'm absolutely involved in all the public to t.v.'s you know i probably will and i don't know not being rated by the police why am i not running a role why am i not now in new york why not now in london why am i here in moore school in your studio fighting for your rights and talking about iraq that's what i want to say absolutely and it's proof you're here and it's very happy to talk about it. more news now from across the globe yemen's prime minister has and has escaped in assassination attempt after unidentified gunmen opened fire on his convoy no one was hurt in the attack in the capital of sanaa which happened as the

you then have to have 3000 or 30,000, etc., so what you do need to be serious about war. we need a reasonable size defense establishment. these days with cruise missiles and drones and airpower, you do not need lots of soldiers and marines, you don't need lots of backup, you do not need the ships -- it is not right. if you are serious about maintaining some modicum of force order, you need adequate offenses. we are already getting close to the position that we are undercutting our ability simply to do what minimally we need to be able to do in the world. host: 10 years out from the start of the iraq war, what is your inspected today? guest: we were wrong -- he was wrong about his thought process of weapons of mass destruction. he had of course use chemical weapons before. i think it was a roller coaster, obviously. there were too few troops on the ground in the beginning. we were critical of rumsfeld and bush for the conduct with the war. i think they were unfortunately right that they did not adjust until the end of 2006. so i really regret the 2004 to 2006 period where

or program. the secretary of the treasury proposed one thing the secretary of agriculture another, the director of the budget other things, etcese were policies and programs. most of them were needed. most of them did some good. but it was a confused, disorganized army. the employment act of 1946 made it necessary that each of these programs be evaluated in terms of the whole. when this act became law the war was over. the economy erupted into prosperity. dire predictions of hard times vanished in the explosion of pent-up consumer demand. the law that was supposed to prevent another great depression became the continuing justification for fiscal policy. the war's end signaled the beginning of a long, uninterrupted period of continuing prosperity. passage of the 1946 employment act marked the government's commitment to use its considerable power to ensure that prosperity continued. we asked economic analyst richard gill the rationale for using fiscal policy to maintain economic stability. the rationale was very much influenced by the ideas of john maynard keynes whose major work was published in 1936. keynes thought total priv

etc. feel or react if local money had to pass any eyes in this chamber who had nothing to do with raising that local money? i don't have words to say what you would say. n that circumstance. for if this government was founded on any presence pl, it was founded on the presence pl of federalism and -- it was founded on the principle of federalism and if there's any it's g to federalism, local control, there's no taxation without representation you don't get to say what think constituents do with their money. that's a basic principle of american federalism. the gentlelady from texas. ms. jackson lee: i was in my office, congresswoman, i could you and i to hear wanted to come and applaud you for educating this house on issues of federalism, local control and also reintroducing them to washington, d.c. that gained local control and gained e right to elect its local officials and also, maybe most people don't know, has an operational budget that's balanced and in actuality could continue to run its services for its people as the congresswoman has indicated be for the pass-through that's reared

you know how far west laws to death penalty etc i guess is every single day from people saying how could you live in moscow the reality is that if two tourists or americans come to moscow if they have come in say the sense just like they will in any other country they will be safe. but i think you have a can i just we're not seeing we're not singling out russia we're not singling out russia here in london just in the last you may not see but they went through here is certainly is and i think i can tell you about some of his experiences that he's had with them not being interested guy you think you. know i mean i think i mean i'm going to agree with that homophobia is rife in this country i absolutely agree also with your point of two americans leaving here and not expressing their sexual orientation openly will be absolutely safe in this country and all these things about the talks about homophobia in this country if they're not involved in the public good t.v. they're not involved in the l.g.b. activism they will be absolutely free in this country and. will not be have any problems but what i'm saying that. also the point is that absolutely tr

know how far west laws to death penalty etc and i get messages every single day from people saying how could you live in moscow the reality is that if two tourists or americans come to moscow if they have come in say that sense just like that one and then the other country they will be safe. but also you have a can i just we're not seeing we're not singling out russia we're not singling out russia here in london just in the last you can i not say but they went through here is certainly is and i think i can tell you about five his experiences that he's had with them not being interested guy you think you know if i get to know him i think i mean i'm going to run i agree with that homophobia is rife in this country i absolutely agree also with your point of two americans living here and not expressing their sexual orientation openly will be absolutely safe in this country and all these things about the talks about homophobia in this country if they're not involved in the public good t.v. they're not involved in the l.g.b. activism they will be absolutely free in this country and. will not be have any problems but what i'm saying that. also the point i

etc. what the president has to do from a political perspective is not very complicated. he has got to stand with the american people, 70 orf them who want to create jobs. he has got to raise the minimum wage and fight for that. he has to address global warming, but the republicans on the defensive, stop talking about the world of post-partisan republicans do not agree with for one second. what pains me is republican ideology is not supported by 10 or 15% of americans. they want jobs. they want to raise minimum wage. they want to make college affordable. they want to improve our health care system. has got to dodent is rally the american people. as long as right wing extremists control the house of representatives, i worry about the future of this country. >> let me talk about the issue of immigration reform. my read on this says, if you don't get immigration reform passed this year, it doesn't happen in the obama era. it. is how i see syria, the looming debt ceiling, the issue of jobs are serious issues. i don't know how you even get to immigration reform this year. too many republicans next year have too much at stake to

don't do it too much, or go very far. no quotas, etc. but you can't -- can.is view was picked up in a case called bruder. gruder. yes, you cand that use affirmative action. be careful you don't go too far. we hope that it will not be necessary in 25 years. i will leave lawyers to interpret that. now, the case comes up again, the same issue out of texas. what will the court do? there was a lot of speculation. gruder has not led to a lot of litigation. would there be a change? would they say no affirmative action? said,members of the court grudde ris -- gruder is the law. so what do i say? i say, that's right. there we are. that is why i think it is an important case. sometimes an important case is reaffirming a case which reaffirms another case. >> you said you don't like hanging in the minority. what a surprise. --onder if there are times you chose not to join justice ginsburg's decision. are there times when you think it might be better, even though you feel passionately about an issue, to join the majority to be able to influence the decision and how it is

or against quota, i do not have an answer. but you need them. of things -- a myriad of things to empower women, to have access. to be a leader, etc>> if there is one place where they do not have access it is serious. we will talk about it when we come back. stay with us. ♪ >> welcome back. before we resume the debate, a sample of the stories we will be following for you at the top of the hour on france 24. bashar al-assad calls on the u.s. to say it won't strike before he hands over chemical weapons, weapons which he says he will hand over one month after the signing of syria to an international ban on chemical weapons. funerals follow bloody scenes at a mosque in baghdad. bombs killing dozens. despite a security cramped dan -- crackdown in the capital. russia is among those sounding alarm. north korea apparently restarts a creaking nuclear reactor. we will have those stories and much more for you at the top of the hour on france 24. welcome back or welcome if you are just joining us. we are taking stock of whether or not women or more or less empowered since two and a half years ago started the arab spring. with us to talk about

the way hollande or obama said they will intervene, they said we are just targeting a few sites, etc. >> what do you think of john mccain's position? >> this is it. this is a main point. what will happen? the united states and france -- if there is no u.n. mandate, a big mistake. you will see that bashar is still there, that the syrian army is not broken. the opposition say you have to carry on because he does not understand the signal. step-by-step, you will go up. that is very dangerous to where it goes. because when you use force in the international situation, you know when you start. you never know when you finish it. the most difficult thing is how to handle war. we have seen that in lebanon. we have seen that in afghanistan. we have seen that in iraq, which has been a chaotic situation. one million dead. saddam has maybe killed many people, i agree. but the poor iraq he people have suffered that much. >> we heard complaints about the prospects of inertia, doing nothing, what that would do. >> i do not say we should do nothing. pi think that since the u.n. experiment, they are g

paranoid permanent were not psychotic, or those who are psychotic, they tend to reject therapy and help because they feel they don't accept other people's opinions, etc. they're extremely difficult to treat. if they have the psychosis in which medication would be in order to prescribe what often happens they are then released, they take it for a little bit of time. don't like the effects and leave it in the draw. >> yet again you have a guy who was able to buy a gun. he was also able to maintain his secret clearance. we look at federal gun laws. they banned 36 categories that prevent people from purchasing you arms, , and it just seems to me that that list should be expanded, and the second you start talking about psychosis, you start talking about trying to sue people, the voices in your head, something should be done to keep them fro allowing them to buy guns. >> we have 300 million guns, a little bit less in the way of guns than there are people. to imagine that people cannot get guns illegally even if they're prevented by law is ridiculous. they're going to be able to get guns. the one who is are fixed-- >> aside from the guns this guy had a secr