>> the plural there should not be.g office reits, really? >> the plural there should not be. office reits, really? >> the plural there should not be >> so one office reits that you like >> there might be at least one that i like. and they are very particular you have to look at every building, every location but i found at least one reits, even occupancy modestly declining, these stocks are down 70%, 80% from the previous peeks and those that are in quality markets like coastal markets, southern california, they just might be cheap enough that there is interesting up side there >> and we'll leave it there. ladies, thank you so much. >>> let's get to our twitter question of the day. which are you most closely watching amazon, alphabet, microsoft or meta you can vote and results coming up later on. >>> now a check on some of the top names we're watching christina. >> and let's start with lyft because lyft is confirming that it would significantly reduce its head count next week according to an email from the ceo. the "wall street journal" is putting that number at 1200 employee

well , of course, and i, by the way, agree in this sense that he said that we allow pluralism., if on the main issue, we agree. well, generally speaking, it's true. let's look at how the situation around us in soviet times, the democratic center is a little different. it's like before we argue and then fuck. well, by the way, incidentally, all democracies include, including theoretical relatives. somehow it was definitely called this is not. you don't understand it. it is in fact sovereignty democratic centralism electric centralism was when it limited the discussion. he's just reporting. no, the democratic center that you can lead any discussion until a decision is made is all this is understandable. this is a little bit different here. that's what, what he said, that if everyone agrees on one issue, when they you can have a discussion. and if you do not agree on the main question, then there is no need to have a discussion. and if you agree with yourself, then discuss something. no, as you can see, we all agree that we need a win. we all agree that it is necessary to expel am

you can afford any pluralism. yes, of course, that's all.hat, i shut up hammered a nail into the lid of rude imperialism, the official representative of the chinese foreign ministry, ben. participants in the meeting of the craft world of the big seven absolutely kinked china and the objective factor of the group will intervene in the internal shooting range of the dprk and deliberately published by the minister of porn statements in arrogance of reason, there is no good attempt to resist. to china, we condemn and reject it. this is horror. these strict representation of japan as accepted by all the country, we once again call on the country whose son to think about their own problems and abandon the mentality of the charon of war and terroristically point the finger at others stop grossly interfering in the inner ted by hand and stop creating there in society. well, hatred is right. i don't know, of course, whether to start with a barrel of horror bunny boys that they have and other things, but these are, of course, amazing two things, what

essentially what we're looking at is a conflict it towards plural polarity or multi polarity. the u. s. wants to right back with 30 jango by the way, we talk about success when we talk about growth. it's called the rick sanchez podcast, and i'd be in conflict from a u. s. perspective. is this something offense? very dramatic development and talk d 9 during the 1st post soviet wave of nato's that a c. like by now as a crunching sound dream. yeah. still luna beach but i see you what i do to historical disagreements left over from the soviet union. but what i see is great idealism. it's a political, those are one type of place. so i'm thinking if number one enemy, our government is trying to fire happens to guam and the japanese islands and australian eas magnate. but still, china's economy keeps differentiated strategy. now to be able to, so what's the key? what's the key to the west? i would say the answer is in a word with it, in essence taking sides against china, against russia and against all. and that may be why that border clash is more worthy of attention. we're back now

you can afford any pluralism. yes , of course, that's all.hut up hammered a nail in the coffin of imperialism , the official representative of the chinese foreign ministry the participants of the meeting and the objective facts of the group intervened in the internal tir-kr and the porn statements deliberately published by the ministers in the arrogance of reason no dobrevne in an attempt to resist. china to contain it, we condemn and reject. this and already with the body these strict representation of japan as accepted by all the country , we once again call on the country whose son to think about their own problems and abandon the mentality of charon war and iteractical pointing the finger to others to stop rudely interfering in domestic affairs. and stop compose however in society. well, it’s right to hate ivanovich, i don’t know, of course, whether to start with a barrel of horror bunny boys that they have other things, but these, of course, are amazing two things, what does pluralism mean - it’s good if everything is coordinated, and we

that is plural at press dot org member the dot org in the plural headliners and you'll be fine subject line for that put me in the subject and kate will send your questions. me and if you see me looking at my phone just be assured that i'm reading your questions not checking tender. we are very grateful to have each of you with us tonight. i'll start. i will start by grabbing this might there there we go walking over here taking a seat and i just wanted to start off by asking each a little bit and feel free to provide any any background that i did not but a little bit about just your initial comments and thoughts on this book. how did it come together? and really what was your main takeaway from writing it? you want to put hello. i think that our main takeaway was that it's kind of crazy to write a with three authors, but if you have a really relationship with, people who have different skill sets and knowledge and together you can write a book like highly recommend that you do it. the takeaway i mean for me i'm the journalist on the team so i came to this project having, you know, bee

e , taking into account the fact that in america there are huge problems with political pluralism.s, of course, a link to the future. uh, this whole electoral series, what i mean, yes, there are more than thirty parties registered in the united states of america, but we don’t know them and don’t see them, because everyone knows that there are only two parties that have been passing each other for 200 years relay stick. what does this lead to? it leads to the fact that within each of the parties a huge the number of opponents. even if under e a single cap, but, nevertheless, opposing clans. and now, just the pompeo clan, it opposes the conditional clan, trump, the position of donald trump was repeatedly expressed by him, and it basically consists in the fact that we are engaged in protectionism. we are making america great again and you are not wasting government money, but on some incomprehensible conflicts on the other side of the globe. that is, this also applies to the position on ukraine, this also applies to trump’s position on taiwan, pompeo is right opposite. and the flank o

so i'm tking to e plural for of that, over 2,000, 10,000 years. so this is contour farming. this is what it looks like. this is keeping soil erosion from happening by pnting peendicula we'vbeen doi the samthing. but fortunately,hese are scntifical validat. these actices e not, s weon't getunded fothat. makeno senseright? d i ask self, wellwho came up th the method first? (audience laughing) you know? 2,000 versus 75 years. i wonder about that. there's a great guy out there named leopold, and he says that he's the father of conservation or someone calling him that. i said, "well, that's youopinion." a lot of our knowledge has already been drafted and assumed a different type of name. "no till agriculture". we've been doing that forever. there's a new one called "regenerative agriculture". we've been doing that forever. (laughing) look the pictures right here. 1901, 2015. look at the continuity. it hasn't changed. you don't see a $100,000 john deere 14 row planter out there. you see little hopis out there with their john deere hats and a planting stick. (group laughing) that's

the motivation is absolutely ridiculous, what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually do, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights in our celebrate holidays and honor their heroes. andrea started off and that is where we leave the news block for nigh, but do stick close. because in moments we've got the full set down with russian deputy foreign minister mikhail collusion who talks potential piece talks in ukraine and moscow's pivot towards the global side. let's ride ahead the non to 10 conditions of a piece planned that would meet all of their brushes requirements. you mentioned that ukraine and international community need to recognize their new territorial reality. which means that they should not only recognize the korean peninsula as the parts of russia, but also the 4 regions of phones approach year don't. and that's can ganske me. why is that so important for you? that's the international community. it recognizes these regions as a part of russia because as we know at this poin

s. desire for continued una polarity versus the chinese movement towards plural polarity or multi polarity. the u. s. wants to resist this and i, it's not beyond, ah, you know, initiating kinetic war to achieve at sam's. we're going to be right back with k j. now by the way, i have a podcast. good. you know, where i as a journalist as a latino, as an entrepreneur, tell my stories of where i've failed and where i've learned and we talk about success when we talk about growth. it's called the rick sanchez podcast. and i invite you to check it out and i'll see you there. so when we come back, we're going to take a look at the chinese indian conflict from a u. s. perspective. is this something the us will capitalize on and, and how ah, one place her one type of place. so i'm thinking pariah. the u. s. is number one, enemy, proper place. we ship weapons to tie were, et cetera. we send battleships through the straits of taiwan. we conduct mode keeps expanding, then there's the created strategy now to be able to expand its reach goal. so what's the key? what's the key turn on the world who study

and again, a plurality, 47% say yes. transit. >> george: any insight into the public' instructions to the others? >> we have been hearing from analysts about how this case in manhattan might be the weakest of the various investigations swirling around former president trump from a legal perspective and i think that is backed up in our poll. 44% say that they believe there should be charges in the former president's handling of classified material. we have a pretty similar slightly higher number that supports the idea of charging him in connection with the january 6 attack. that is 49%. and the clearest public support in any of those investigations, the efforts to overturn the 2020 election. 51% of voters overall say that he should be charged in connection with that again. there are others who want to see more information. what is interesting to me about that number, george, is that includes about 20%. what in five republicans that thing there should be criminal charges filed against former president trump over his effort

and pluralism? you so much for all that you have done and for this remarkable look at all of your work. julie alvarez is the author of how the garcia girls lost thei accents. >> thank you so much >> i want to watch that again. that does it for me. thank you for. watching kashmir every saturda and sunday morning from 10 a to noon eastern. stay right with me inside with jen psaki begins right now. >> it has been a head spinning and historic week in america the former president arreste and arraigned. the stunning expulsion of tw lawmakers in tennessee and late friday, a ruling on the portion pill that coul have enormous implications for women al

he's had plural plurality in the popular vote, but he didn't win the electoral college. he decides he's going to expand who can vote in and expand democracy. but this is very much tied to why proper men. and he was really clear on this. this wasn't. yeah. and then later on, we'll get to the other people who believe this was his view. so you have various opposing views of harriet tubman who saw a multiracial people, multi gender, multi religious multiclass of society, versus someone who had a very, very narrow and brutal autocratic view of society. and so that was really at stake at that particular battle. when you step back and look at the occurrence, the overall, it is an issue of what narratives are being told by the images and the stories that we're seeing on this everyday object that we interact with. but very passively, kind of don't acknowledge there are and have been native americans in this country who never touch the $20 bill because they understood who andrew jackson was. right. and this is our opportunity to to understand that as well, which is amazing when yo

and pluralism? this is what you, get you read books. julia, thank you so much for all that you have done and for this remarkable look at all of your work. julie alvarez is the author of how the garcia girls lost thei accents. >> thank you so much >> i want to watch that again. that does it for me. thank you for. watching kashmir every saturda and sunday morning from 10 a to noon eastern. stay right with me inside with jen psaki begins right now. >> it has been a head spinning and historic week in america the former president arreste and arraigned. the stunning expulsion of tw lawmakers in tennessee and late friday, a ruling on the portion pill that coul have enormous implications for women all across the country senator catherine cortez masto described that texas rulin with a word i cannot say o television and that exclusive interview i coming up first. plus, what is next for justi j. pearson one of the tennessee three who captivity the country this week i will ask him when he joins m in just a few

geography experts are for whom, but because the president of france, within the framework of illegal pluralismand europe does not care about taiwan for us. that we are pulling something is not our problem. this is when everyone speaks in unison with one voice. and that's why he doesn't call it a prick and a counterbalance to the macron, while europe thinks differently. ok then. you think differently. that's what will happen if the macron. will become the head of the united europe about the president of france there will be another person, nikolay is a good question today. in the first parts of the program have already sounded revolutionary songs revolutionary fire on the evil bourgeoisie. i would like to continue in this tone. eh, because it seems to me that the best phrase that characterizes the current world situation is that the top cannot. they want for them. at the same time, it is necessary to give an explanation to the top, this, of course, the united states is the hegemon. they appointed themselves that way. well , some kind of support group choir, as barrel said, and not for this, all

but i've also been making films about us that is to say the lower case two letter plural pronoun intimacy of us and we and our and majesty and complexity and the contradiction and the controversy of the u.s. and jefferson says in the declaration he says that all experience has shown that man kindow are more disposed to sufr while evils are sufferable. he's kind of acknowledging that this new thing, this republic is going take a lot ofed work and a lot of energy and that default position of human beings is to passively accept authoritarianism and no form of government up to that point so i thinkt. what we see right now is that existential threat that michael mentioned because we're in one of the great crises that we've experienceds and it comes with unlike other three crises a real sense that the stuff we o took for graduated fe and fairff elections the peacefl transfer of power, and independent judiciary you can go on and on and on seem to be part of the equation of what is not quite right from my particular point of view and any little silo where everything is being repeated over and ove

political pluralism must continue to be possible in tunisia.olly: let's take a look at what is behind the political instability in tunisia. kais saied was voted in as president in 2019 after securing 79% of the vote in a runoff election. two years later he suspended parliament and awarded himself the power to rule by decree. n june 2022, he fired dozens of judges. the rest of the judiciary went on strike in protest. the following month, and new constitution was backed in a heavily boycotted referendum. december saw another record low turnout of voters. since early february the government has arrested more than 20 political opponents who criticize the president. tunisia faces other challenges. the economy is under severe pressure, hit hard by the pandemic and global factors. talks with the have stalled and president saied rejected the terms of a new $1.9 billion bailout deal. farmers say a severe drought is threatening its grain harvest at a time when alternative supplies are being affected by the war in ukraine. water distribution to many areas

underestimated in search results, that is, there is an american pluralism of opinions in all its glory under the close control of algorithms in companies meta but seriously, a separate interest is how the moderators justify the desire to shut hersh's mouth, but actually how to explain boris ivanin, boris welcome. well, as far as i understand, they persistently offer to read some other article, which herger allegedly refutes. yes, if good evening quite right. this article is already norwegian. actually that side, which is called up to the ears for oil in this sabotage, they were not lost, they say, the best defense is an attack. western social networks are replacing publications of users, deliberately, distorting their meaning and that's it. this is for the sake of political conjuncture. the main goal of such manipulations is to moderate not just the news feed, but the public consciousness. on a global scale, experts say. and apparently. entire algorithms have already been built for this. here's how the cleverness of facebook, which i recall in russia is recognized as extremist , change

he has the plurality of folks in the gop primary season. that will be problematic because he will suck up the wind and oxygen and that will hurt people like governor desantis, asa hutchison and others because it's donald trump's republican party even with the 34 class e felony indictments over his head. >> marjorie taylor greene was saying donald trump did nothing wrong. he is innocent. she did an interview that i saw sitting with somebody inside of a car likening donald trump to jesus and nelson mandela. what about this rises to the level of illegality. talk to us about the case that has to be made about illegality. >> what has to happen, first let me talk about marjorie taylor greene. she looks like she is auditioning to be the vice president for donald trump or on his ticket. if you look at the legal case laid out by the d.a., by bragg today, he is making a leap from those class e felonies to federal campaign finance law. this is really sticky in terms of constitutional rights, first amendment violations, in terms of what campaigns do. h

the motivation is absolutely ridiculous, what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually do, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights can or celebrate holidays and honor their heroes. a contract is the waiter in poland and france is hindering ammunition deliveries to kiev that says, the 2 countries topped it will not fail to reach agreement over where the spoils from the e. you will end that are taken care of your rachel mars. it has more. queen ursula, literally just finish admonishing all the kiddies in the u. schoolyard over the need for unity at all cost against china. and already it seems like they found something else that they disagree on. sources are now telling the western press, the countries are caught up in arguing about whether funding earmarked by brussels for ammunition production or ukraine and to replenish member states own supplies should be spent inside europe as france is arguing, or whether that cache ultimately taken from the pockets of taxpayers of member states, l

the next is the year 2020 for the agency will double that to nearly 20000 with $1.4 billion in the plurality of path toward enforcement treasury department several years ago after the deadline drawing many on capitol hill, where is the opposition and wife to thiss plan? >> multi parts to that. they were opposed to the 80 billing and all because the opponents of that spending republicans mostlypu say it will lead to unfair targeting of unfair everyday americans. obviously part of the republican party is more tax enforcement, it can be problematic. they are worried about adding staff and what itle will mean fr small businesses who might receive more audits the biden administration will only increase, audit rates for high earners will be impacts for middle income individuals so there is concerned that and there is pushback and delay of getting this on exactly where the spending will go. even after they put the plan out there is pushback in terms of lack of specificity and long-term goals and things like hiring. nextxtfi year what will that lok like three or four or five or six years down the ro

opportunities for an alternative opinion of dissent of pluralism should not be, probably, still, probablyan still somehow wait out the situation, but this is a false feeling. those who are silent in ukraine who does not actively defend their values ​​does not go against the regime, but actively does not lag behind their values. maybe they don’t feel such pressure on themselves now, but i repeat once again, this is a false sense of security, it will let you down. everything, this proves that the kiev regime has turned the religious sphere into one of the instruments of its nationalist policy aimed at cleaning the country from dissentingly revealing silence, and this time the washington satellites. all this manual expert community in connection with the criminal persecution of the ukrainian provocateur-orthodox church by the kiev regime, in general, as you probably know, we have repeatedly said this, usually americans instantly expose any facts of violation of rights and freedoms. especially if it is connected with russia. however, this time there is official support for the actions of the

, and this liberal order excludes precisely pluralism, because the culture of exchange or liberalism.mpatible. vyacheslav alekseevich ruled, we didn’t see these really, but, unfortunately, we did. uh, the consequences of the actions of those who appeal to these unknown rules, and the consequences of the action is the destruction of countries. this is the bombing of innocent peoples. uh, it's an attempt to keep everyone in the economy like that. e enslavement. ultimately, all these unknown rules they aim at maintaining a non- evasive system. and we see that if it is not possible to maintain. and what is a kind of colonism in a simple way? this is the same as colonialism, only with white gloves, as it were. yes, there is no open fascism, and there is no open and this cruelty. yes, from time to time. he appoints someone outcast of him. eh, so they poison then they bomb. well, everyone says, well, okay. maybe he himself was, uh, was wrong, that is, non-colonialism is the same colonialism. only here is a little bit of a human face, as if we see that now because it's not about the colonial

s. desire for continued una polarity versus the chinese movement towards plural polarity or multi polarity. the u. s. wants to resist this and i, it's not beyond, ah, you know, initiating kinetic war to achieve at sam's. we're going to be right back with 30 jango. by the way, i have a podcast. good. you know, where i as a journalist as a latino, as an entrepreneur, tell my stories of where i've failed and where i've learned and we talk about success when we talk about growth. it's called the rick sanchez podcast. and i invite you to check it out and i'll see you there. so when we come back, we're going to take a look at the chinese indian conflict from a u. s. perspective. is this something the us will capitalize on and, and how ah ah ah ah so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be in arms. race is on offense. very dramatic development only personally and getting to resist. i don't see how that strategy will be successful, very critical time time to sit down and talk with ah, welcome back, i'm i'm, i'm just sitting here thinking and,

the rule logging into the right to a fair trial and freedom of expression, which the for political pluralism must continue to be possible. anton is his most well, let's take a look at what's behind the political instability in taneesha k side was voted in as president in 2019, after securing 73 percent of the vote in a run off election. 2 years later, he sat, his government suspended parliament and awarded himself the power to rule by decree . in june 2022, he fired dozens of judges. the rest of the judiciary went on in protest. the following month, a new constitution backed by side was passed in a heavily boycotted referendum, a parliamentary election in december. so another record low turn out of voters. since early february, the government has arrested more than 20 political opponents and public figures who criticized the president. and to measure faces, other challenges, economies under severe pressure hit hard by the pandemic. and global factors talks with the i m f have stolen president site has rejected the terms of a new 1900000000 dollar bailout deal. farmers. c, a severe drought is

the motivation is absolutely ridiculous, what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually due, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights can or celebrate holidays and other their heroes. well, you can tell them to yourself, any of those stories by checking out our website. why not leave a comment on a story or 2 as well? always good to hear what you're thinking out there. this is 247 parts international . mm hm. ah ah ah ah, with shimmer that's i with no lou, but he started to study of colombia. he boosted your mamma paula, you use a. 2 2 blue that says t tbd that he pull for a sherpa she, anthea, thought sumeet, you must have. yeah, so she did such a chipotle. you can wash right map again with a g b a, but it's like michael w smith more lives analysis. you put them king some might say 70 years is a reasonable life. i pray michelin that may be full of, of, and both happy or sad. all know, and jamie reisdorf maternity and glorious achievement was misty in the historic sense. so he said in t

what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about? but they actually do, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights can or celebrate holidays and other their heroes with washington sets that will continue to supply weapons. she, taiwan, but tant. u. s. officials have declined to speculate on f or when the chinese military might invade taiwan. ah, united states plays a major strategic role in the indo. proceed. with 375000 personnel, there is a vast network of operations that extend from hawaii all the way to india. ah, we've talked a lot this year about the growing threats we face from the ccp. they've triple defense spending in a decade. and that's what they admit to, oh, a, what's most alarming is the increasingly provocative actions. president z has taken in recent years, pushing out china's borders with new defense agreements and military bases, and for nations illegally building militarized islands and try to limit freedom of navigation in the south china sea, thre

, yeah, tolerate any foreign interference end or as far as the media reporting goes, there was no plural, t, m, r. the reporting was online and basically repeating the official stance. what i found really concerning was that am the people's liberation army. the chinese military was publishing a video which was really very wor, glorifying. there were basically m as showing those drilled stable were with m bombastic and musical squire, a lot of our fighter jets taking off and basically portraying those drills as, as some patriotic walgreens, a font that really very concerning. actually there were no critical undertones on that issue. at all, does any of this, though, increase the likelihood of an invasion of taiwan so, and then an invasion probably will build up over the course of several months. for example, you will see a lot of mobilization of troops, et cetera. so it's not very likely that an invasion will start um, basically in the heat of earth, of some of our military drills and i think am, it's not the time for that yet. i mean, if you talk to, i'm diplomat, see a european diploma

the motivation is absolutely ridiculous, what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually do, although i.

s. desire for continued una polarity versus the chinese movement towards plural polarity or multi polarity. the u. s. wants to resist this and i, it's not beyond, ah, you know, initiating kinetic war to achieve it, same's we're going to be right back with k j. now, by the way, i have a podcast. good. you know, where i as a journalist as a latino, as an entrepreneur, tell my stories of where i've failed and where i've learned and we talk about success when we talk about growth. it's called the rick sanchez podcast. and i invite you to check it out and i'll see you there. so when we come back, we are going to take a look at the chinese indian conflict from a u. s. perspective. is this something the us will capitalize on and, and how ah ah, in 1834 france invaded algeria, and straight away the french started inhabiting it to strengthen their position. the colonists, known as p a. no, ours took the best land from day one, the local population was put into an unequal position and was brutally exploited. this gauze, mazda is content. the people of algeria began their long term fight for independ

that is, on the face of american pluralism of opinions, well, in all its glory under the close controlrithms, the banned and extremist company meta but seriously , of particular interest is how the moderators justify the desire to shut up a good mouth. and actually how to explain boris ivanin? western social networks replace publications users, deliberately, distorting their meaning and that's it. this is for the sake of political conjuncture. the main goal of such manipulations is to moderate not just the news feed, but the public consciousness. on a global scale, experts say. and apparently. entire algorithms have already been built for this. here's how the cleverness of facebook, which i recall in russia is recognized as extremist, changed the publication of an american reporter. michael schellenberger censoring almost automatically in just a minute. look what the journalist wanted to post famous article family. orsha about how the united states staged a diversion on the nord stream gas pipeline, and norwegian sailors used explosives. and that's it, facebook is marking incorrect inf

the motivation is absolutely ridiculous, what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually do, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights can or celebrate holidays and honor their heroes. with andrea stark off. and that is where we leave the news block for nigh, but do stick close. because in moments we've got that full set down with russian deputy foreign minister mikhail collusion who talks potential peace talks in ukraine and moscow's pivot towards the global side. which ride ahead ah, among the 10 conditions.

ulob, you know, it is possible to create a mass such a powerful defense system as, for example, the pluralond world war , it greatly helped the french well, probably not so in the same way, in other areas , it is necessary to understand that the main thing is not defensive structures, but the motivation of the troops that defend them, that is why when we talked with you about the need to talk about the offensive about offensive operations that affect the moral and psychological state of the enemy, it also affects the moral and psychological state of the enemy because all defensive structures are so in the case when someone defends and we remember that the enemy created three lines of defense around kherson and this helped him a lot and probably not we liberated the right-bank kherson region without much difficulty, although it was a hard work of several months, which we are actually already conducting. if we talk about the offensive, we can say that the offensive has already begun, it is being conducted because it is enough to look at the summary of the general staff to see that we are car

the motivation is absolutely ridiculous, what kind of democracy and pluralism can we talk about. but they actually do, although up to 40 percent of the population has no political representation and cannot exercise their rights can or celebrate holidays and other they heroes. for 360 view at scottie, nell hughes gets going next. catch that after the shortest breaks, they'll be here at the top with all of the end of the work in weeks tom news stories to join me that ah you ok. defense secretary ben wallace recently said, i'm optimistic between this year and the next year. i think ukraine will continue to have the momentum with it and a position of strength. he also said, there is no magic one moment when russia collapses. in what universe is? wallace reside? ah, ramsey, the great mustafah kimmel at a turk, caesar augustus jo a haro a narrow ru alexander. the great tink has long winston churchill napoleon bonaparte . all names of past leaders whose reputations of a great power supremacy and influence outside of their countries borders have left a legacy worthy of the history books.

why not, in fact, work with artek who is there, but does not write these columns, so pluralism is all why not? moreover, i really understand the middle east, but about it. i don’t write on rt when figs, as it were, is also an indicative case, so that everything that i have ever done it still has a continuation in the present and, probably, in the future, the same notorious non-payment of a communal apartment in russia is now very relevant don't know how to belarus well, without exception, in fact, well, the greatest exceptions complain about lawlessness already as management companies. they also appeared. i just didn’t pay like that, 11 persuaded my neighbors to create in the cis i do n’t know how it is with you, well, an apartment association, probably, you also have it completely. you have an association of owners, then, of course, i was the first to pay there actively organized zheka that i wouldn’t pay you, not a penny, this is a matter of principle and i didn’t pay, and then i created the osb and completely took away the house from them like this in any in the case when you don’t

for that is that the republican party, republican voters still strongly support donald trump, by a plurality, not a majority. but what that means is, if you go against trump, there is a big group of voters, maybe about a 3rd of the republican party who will not support you after that. and he has been able to weapon eyes that support face in order to force these other leaders to vocally support him even when many of them privately voice concerns about him and wish he would frankly, just go away. so they don't want to lose the support of those people, ideally, in the eyes of many of them, they'd like to see trump just disappear. john hampton, thank you very much. indeed. i said we've been hearing pro and anti trump demonstrations. been take. they sat outside at the new york court where they full, my u. s. president was rained as i listen, that before taught to august and a minute to what some of the professors have been saying. it doesn't matter what and john, no matter what, he isn't, he's a man or just risen. he's the world president. i'm here because i am heartbroken that our country and th

that's a position that i kind of defend and work on, then we need to think about multiplicity and pluralityways to tame the systems. but not just the systems, basically the companies and the institutions that give rise to the production of these systems. and we need to kind of make a reconfiguration of economic and political arrangements. i think mainly the united states and other parts of the world, but i say the united states because many of these generative ai models that have captured the imagination of the public in the world is coming from there. cyril: sorry, what does that look like, to reconfigure political and economic arrangements? what do you mean concretely? >> i mean that it should not really be the case that one country in the world or a specific part of a country kind of decides to develop these systems and then releases these systems for free. and basically they say these systems are going to benefit all of humanity without having a concrete sense of what what is humanity, what is all of humanity, and what does it mean to benefit all of humanity? cyril: so do you mean that

this time, in the form of a book with the title of plural guide it is very beautifully compiled, the questions in this book are varied, the expression is very simple and eloquent, it is very good, in fact, it is written in the form of a book, it answers the moral and devotional questions of young people , it answers the questions of young people and people according to their needs. there are questions that have been asked on different occasions by master javadan and he came to answer them, and the book is categorized in the form of the qur'anic, historical, narrative questions and issues related to marriage and family. in this book , farsi should use this answer. your daily life will be answered at a very high level religious issues will be reformed and improved. answering the questions is not enough. it is not enough. the art of words is important. how do you say this in the name of a single answer? radan far, they should say, abbas, accept one and reject the other. give advice on material and spiritual matters. it is complete and a spiritual shop related to the blessed month of has

yes, pluralism is an opinion, these are western values.hing at all, they will ever be the main thing, probably, the question is, or was it all the king was naked, in fact, all this time and only now we were able to say it out loud, that there was no freedom of speech there. and now let's see just a fragment of your film in 2015, the american institute of winter launched the international fact-checking network if cn, on the official website it is stated that as part of the project, more than 100 companies around the world are engaged in high-quality verification of information in the code of principles. if scm. stubbornly non-partisan justice and objectivity. the very idea of ​​a fair fight for information seems to be useful and necessary . however, the international fact-checking network is not as unbiased as you are positioned. andrey is a specialist in fact-checking and on conditions anonymity agreed to tell the specifics of ifcn’s work, this organization was originally created for the information war against donald trump in 2020, the ne