poroshenko, you can imagine how many times i wanted to say yes, no dear, poroshenko would have begun to worry and if they said that this was poroshenko's pipe, that's more it would be appropriate not because i now want to or am going to justify myself. i have never made excuses in my life if there are facts. контакты и отношения комне середи руководство Российской Федерация about the purchase of a pipe or a prikarpattsapatransa who owned this pipe for the supply of diesel to ukraine and europe with the president of the russian federation vladimir putin so that transneft could sell this pipe and in order to be able to buy this pipe as it later turned out how then it became clear to mr. poroshenko that in order for this pipeline to become private property, and in fact to be the property of poroshenko himself, he needs to take a series of uh-uh actions, which starts the involvement of the judicial system, which in this case, the pipeline was disputed by transneft and they were brought to a certain decision, they say that it is the property of ukraine, so in order to give the opportunity

the borders, secondly, located to poroshenko no less than to the zelensky poroshenko himself, as uh,ked, they will free such walks. zelensky does not have enough arrogance and not enough resources to imprison poroshenko, but at the same time, we saw how it was difficult for poroshenko to go abroad, but he still went there, therefore his patrons from washington plowed around and explained to zelensky. why is it important to release petr alekseevich fedor alekseevich is important to remind in ukraine is a defendant in a criminal case of treason and terrorist activities. at the same time, from the restrictions, the court imposed on him only the obligation to present zelensky’s threat to poroshenko and his corruption crimes from the time of the election campaign on time for interrogations in the light of these events. i am your curse. that is, i am your sentence now sound, especially funny how and given permission to leave. it would be better for the former president to go to europe now, zelensky probably did not take such steps, because he said, but we needed to say both, but in the way

poroshenko yes, yes, yes , and about the fact that the funds were withdrawn, i think through offshorei think that such data, of course, remain in bank registers, and they remain in the territory of other offshore countries, and all this is in the process of investigating this of a criminal offense has it already been collected by the security service of ukraine or will it still be collected, including through the international legal assistance of those states that cooperate in providing evidence on the part of russia here of course it will be difficult to collect thank you denys maslov people's deputy of ukraine servant of the people faction was in touch ukraine should receive the status of a candidate for the european union already this year, oleg nikolenko emphasized this to the spokesmen of the ministry of foreign affairs in a comment to the european pravda. this is how he reacted to the french minister's statement. who announced the day before that the process of ukraine's accession to the european union may last 15 or 20 years. nikolenko agreed that the process of our european in

they thought that they would harm poroshenko. and they hit him well, in addition to poroshenko, the security service of ukraine summons arsen avakov, oleksandr turchynov, arseniy and yatsenyuk as witnesses, although the same yatsenyuk says that he has already been to the sbu three times. turchynov, who is at the front, says come to me in the trenches and i will give you a testimony hmm, about this case, about the coal case, including what does the sbu want in this case from avakov, from yatsenyuk, from turchynov, or do we understand that for zelensky, for zelensky’s team, e.e., petro poroshenko is a sparring partner in politics, e.g. if er, zelensky will be himself without some kind of partner, well, maybe he won’t look like he, er, could look, so it’s clear why they need poroshenko and why they constantly hang him up in order to have someone to point to, he said oh poroshenko but he was doing something else there and avakov yatsenyuk and oh turchynova avakova was in fact the minister of internal affairs for 2.5 years during zele

lawyer ihor golovan stated that the words of putin's best man, viktor medvedchuk, about poroshenko's involvement in the neza scheme of coal trading and the sale of the pipeline are not true. since the war, poroshenko himself spoke about what we need everyone should unite to bury the ax of war and finally, all those misunderstandings that existed before the war should be put aside, who is now tearing the ax from the earth with an ax of war and what they want to do with this ax, well, from my point of view , this is a story that compromises zelenskyi himself, because fighting against political opponents in conditions of war, when political opponents are not fighting against you, looks at least unreasonable, what should a strong president do, he should call all in the conditions of war, the representatives of the government and the opposition all and say let 's unite let's you have in your factions among your supporters there are people who have different views, but these are people who, just like me, love ukraine and they want to defend it, let's all fight together, who is at the front

petro poroshenko tried at the end of last week.n saturday, i wanted to leave through a checkpoint in the lviv region. well, it was stopped and sent back, and the reason, allegedly purely technical, on a copy of the order of the chairman of the verkhovna rada and the business trips that poroshenko had with him for some reason, the qr-code was not read, then the code was updated, but poroshenko also could not leave on the second attempt some paperwork problems explanations. and after that, the former president turned to the current one with an open letter, in which he asked not to interfere with his travel abroad, they say. poroshenko would like to represent kiev at the congress of deputies of nato countries to discuss ukraine's entry into the alliance worked, but the question is, will petro poroshenko return? the ukrainian security service suspects poroshenko of treason and financing of terrorism. he is a person involved in the same thing that viktor medvedchuk did in the supply of coal to ukraine from those not controlled by kiev t

well, to poroshenko. now they will also change something, so in this aspect, it will not be anything. i know what this leads to. that just a lot of people are now trying to present it as a media process as a media vky with the aim of discrediting the political opponent there, that is, what am i leading to that in this aspect it does not work like that because there is no one to discredit and talk about what poroshenko is zelensky's opponent, it's just funny, because zelensky is on the cover of time as the most influential person in the world well, poroshenko will soon be on this what's his name on the boards, do you remember there used to be one, the police are looking for them, that's why well, that's not the case now, it's not a political matter, as it were they didn't try to build it. now empaths, we are waiting for poroshenko. this is an exceptional criminal matter and should be investigated exclusively, as well as a criminal car , political notation is only an attempt, you know by m-m. yes, it is som

poroshenko in the party of petro poroshenko, european solidarity stated that viktor medvedchuk, quoteling his testimony against poroshenko to avoid responsibility for anti-ukrainian activities he is now ready to declare anything about anyone. in the statement of european solidarity, poroshenko's lawyer ihor golovan stated that the video of the sbu does not correspond to reality, contact us rostislav pavlenko, people's deputy of ukraine, european solidarity, my greetings to you good day, petro poroshenko's team says that this whole story from the video is pr of the sbu . what is from the sbu ? some exchanges, uh, then there is information that there may be some kind of improvement of the conditions, that is, he actually ran in and traded some better conditions, he thinks that if we say what they want to hear from him, his situation will improve, he will be able to avoid responsibility for those real crimes what he did. well, in the end, he is now saying something that directly contradicts everything he said before, that is, he wants to avoid being punished in this way for all the accus

poroshenko found out, in order for this pipeline to become private property, and in fact the property of poroshenko himself, it is necessary for him to take a series of uh-uh actions, the involvement of the judicial system begins, which disputed in this case the pipeline to transneft itself, and were brought to certain decisions, they say that it is the property of ukraine, so that it was necessary to give the opportunity to transport and sell this pipe. it was necessary to do everything so that the transnets again owned and made the decision to sell this pipe, and here mr. poroshenko solved all the issues of both the judicial system and the issues of administrative bodies due to the possibility of the presidential position and administrative influence, the courts, the prosecutor's office, the antimonopoly committee ksenia's state property fund made decisions that are naturally necessary for president poroshenko's personal interests. how much money did he spend on the purchase of the pipe? mr. poroshenko, according to official data, 23 million us dollars were withdrawn through fictiti

is blushing, let's listen to when president poroshenko addressed me, what is his attitude towards mef the russian federation about the purchase of a pipe or a carpathian who owned this pipe for the supply of diesel to ukraine and europe, he turned to me so that i could talk with the president russian federation by vladimir putin so that transneft could sell this pipe and in order to be able to buy back this pipe, as it turned out later, as it turned out later , mr. poroshenko, for years and years, we simply expose, you know, the history of medvedchuk's pipe, you know, it's already some kind of narrative , you know, it's just fixed and we listen with our hands er, the refutation is there that he was then in the administration of president poroshenko. what from viktor medvedchuk told him that all this is not true and understand now for the first time. i don't know in six years of activity so how much do we cover this topic in general viktor medvedchuk admits for the first time yes, it is me and the second he directly names the name of a person who well, roughly speaking, because with w

poroshenko, but the rest of the people will be able to represent ukraine, agree on something, conductiations, explain ukraine's point of view during this russian invasion, and so on and the like. i understood correctly uh, i want to say that, in accordance with all norms of parliamentarism, parliamentary delegations are always formed on a par with the participation of representatives of all parliamentary factions and groups, and here is the parliamentary delegation now on these extremely important the meeting in vilnius at the nato parliamentary assembly is not a parity one, the representatives of the largest opposition faction of european solidarity are not represented there, in essence, our faction was deprived of a vote there today, they were deprived of their position, and unfortunately, this is not the first such case when the government undermines unity and here tv channels close independent ones, then fight with mayors, you know we were in davos now on a business trip and on the sidelines of the world economic forum we talked with the independent mayor of chernihiv vlada matros

situation when there is zelenskyi and poroshenko, an employee or a subordinate during the war, theyther after the war, one becomes the president, the other leads the opposition, they can change roles, for sure, the period, but it does not matter now . it is important not to fall into the moscow eye, and it is important that we clearly understand in whose interests viktor medvedchuk and all these people who may be preparing him for the investigation are also absolutely obvious to me. there is nothing to talk about. we know exactly who is our enemy and who is protecting ukraine and i think that president volodymyr zelenskyi and the ukrainian leadership are aware of it no worse than us. well, how do you think all these news from ukraine are perceived in the west? well, here we quoted what the financial times and even matters. it is not about what impression the published testimony of medvedchuk makes in the west, the news that poroshenko was not allowed to go abroad, but in fact the main question is how this affects the decisions that are being made in the european union right now, in

among other things, one of the members of the official parliamentary delegation is already poroshenkoo rotterdam for the congress precisely from the european people's party, which is not the most influential political family in europe, whose members are the leadership of the eu structures and many member states. and it is precisely there that the leader of the european of solidarity, a solution will be formed, including regarding the strengthening of sanctions against russia, we see that there are actually problematic moments, yes. and today there was a statement by the german minister that the unity of the eu regarding the sanctions against russia is beginning to collapse, it is obvious that efforts are needed here and which diplomats and leaders everyone who can join the process to activate it like petro poroshenko . that is, he is an influential ukrainian politician - he has a great deal of experience as a ukrainian diplomat, he was the minister of foreign affairs, he is very many connections in the west. he very clearly tells the letter that he is leaving with three messages. he i

supporters poroshenko's supporters themselves started these political confrontations and that's whye said that er, this is such a water truce or a military truce that was announced when poroshenko said to forget everything that once was, it lasted there for 23-24 days, and after 26 days, and after that, poroshenko in this it is alleged that they took it and violated it, so now the hands of the representatives of the authorities are untied, so to speak, they are not going to war, but they are already responding with such and different statements. and who do you think violated this truce, and you know well, here somehow you have to forget about insults, because it can start with some kind of small accusations, small shakes and shakes, and then it can lead to more negative consequences . moreover, these consequences, as you rightly say, we do not know what will happen in the future, may not be predicted for our politicians. my lessons from a century ago, when ukrainian politicians quarreled, quarreled and lost. actually, i wanted to say that they didn't lose something else. well, they

poroshenko would have begun to worry , and if they said that it was poroshenko's pipe, it would haveore appropriate, not because i now want or am going to justify myself. i have never made excuses in my life if there are facts i recognized him. yes, in 2016, then president poroshenko turned to me with a request, taking into account my contacts and relations with me, among the leadership of the russian federation, to buy a pipe or a carpathian who owned this pipe for the supply of diesel to ukraine and europe. he turned to me in order to i negotiated with the president of the russian federation, vladimir putin, so that transneft could sell this pipe and in order to be able to buy back this pipe, as it turned out later, as mr. poroshenko later found out, in order that this the pipeline became private property, and in fact it is the property of poroshenko himself, it is necessary for him to take a number of actions , starting with the involvement of the judicial system, which in this case challenged the pipeline to transneft itself and brought certain decisions saying that it is the pro

you know this is a very simple answer that this is an attack on poroshenko it is clear because poroshenko today is not beneficial to the kremlin today poroshenko is certainly not beneficial to many in the middle of ukraine but this is a much more global thing, because what european solidarity is talking about here about ukraine's membership in the european union and nato in june - this will be decided at the eu summit, it will be decided and this is an opportunity for ukraine to receive an action plan for membership in nato, and today what happened with medvedchuk is the second series after what happened with the channels, including espresso, the fifth direct disconnection from digital broadcasting after disconnection from digital broadcasting channels is an attack on freedom of speech, these are small fights for the abstract against the abstract. no, this is concrete , political, some kind of preparation for a political scenario. of course, we are talking about a possible preparation for the elections, but these were not these medvedchuka - this is an attack on the rule of law that such

, because poroshenko doesn't want to finish the war, because poroshenko is corrupted, and corruptiononditions for corruption, so to say. he didn't really see the real cause of the problem is not poroshenko but putin. there were some early signs that this new approach might bearfruit. a prisoner exchange took place, with zelensky on hand at the airport to welcome the captives home. we have to do all the steps to finish this horrible war. do you think this is a new chapter in relations between russia and ukraine? i think this is the first chapter. kurt volker was an american envoy to ukraine, and i travelled with him to the conflict zone in 2018. he says that in zelensky�*s first few months in power, he believed he could do a deal with russia's president. i remember even in ourfirst meetings saying "i understand you want peace, but putin doesn't want peace". this is what he wants to do, he is attacking ukraine on purpose. it is not for lack of some formula, he is doing it because he is trying to weaken ukraine. i think he was initially sceptical of that, but i think as he tried to talk

poroshenko is not in vain that it was he who controlled the pumping of diesel through the pipe, and thech, that is, the actions to pump diesel through the pipe, ceased in may of the nineteenth year in poroshenko's party, european solidarity has already responded to the published video with testimony. they said there that the text to medvedchuk, allegedly written by the customers, is the price for voicing the improvement of conditions of detention. political scientists also associate the publication of the grandiose investigation of the sbu in quotation marks with a moment convenient for the current government, it is necessary to fill the information field after the attack on azov steel. this zrada, of course, hit hard on the e, inflated on this patriotism by the so-called rei. uh, president zelensky, and now you can divert attention from, uh, this foreign policy and military israel for disassembly in the domestic political arena and even better than a blow to his main opponent poroshenko now for zelensky there is no accusing the former president of ukraine of corruption, today he is lau

no, we created a problem in the city of rivne, and for the second day in a row poroshenko and ukrainianliamentarism in general and the laws are mocked at the rava-russian checkpoint, actually there is an e- people's deputies can actually give them the floor. what do they actually think about it, let's see. they have a shameful violation of the law when the leader of the opposition political force european solidarity absolutely he was not illegally released outside the borders of ukraine, he was traveling on the basis of the official order of the head of the verkhovna rada stefanchuk to participate in the nato parliamentary assembly for international meetings for agreements on the supply of weapons to ukraine, these official meetings were waiting for him, the border guards brazenly violated the law, guided by the phone together, we simply did not release him are witnesses to the fact that when our soldiers fight with putin's russia, someone there wants to build putin's dictatorial ukraine in order to then surrender this country, we did not allow this the most it was a shame that the bord

poroshenko orders about money. cash in suitcases is poroshenko now considering again .al with his opponents, therefore, in this case, naturally, he is simply trying to forgive because of the vernacular get off. he's just afraid for well, for his warm place. i don't know about this ukrainian politicians, but the second very important point that i would like to , uh, emphasize about the attitude of the nazis. see they destroy children on purpose. they specifically destroy old women and in this case what they destroy, uh, purposefully animals. well, this is actually logical, but one row continues. why they are very important this is very important. no it's hate everyone in the territory we control everyone who wants to cooperate with the russians with the russian world must be destroyed. those who consider themselves russians should be destroyed around the dogs knew for sure that the russians would not offend. very important. see how they treat those people who were still there 2-3 months ago to control the ukrainian authorities. look at the raisins, constantly bombarding

uh, of course, and uh, pasha uh, poroshenko uh. i mean, petro poroshenko e.ean up, that is, that's partly. that's what you say, this is the place to be and financial issues, because these resources that are now available, which are controlled by poroshenko's contraception zelensky they are in the same degree. they materially distributed in the territory. no, let's take a break abroad now, there are potential parts. it all needs to be cut in a very short break. let's take a couple of minutes. as a battle group commander, they ask for 300 greens. i'll help raise money. why because the russians don't abandon their own. you are super 60+ new season on sunday at 20:20 on ntv, time is running out, and the joints remain in excellent shape, we present art-neo revolutionary composition for joints containing new generation collagen. let the joints stay young tinkoff black card until june 30 and get free maintenance forever. job employment center in russia your job your job at a discount of 5.000 rubles. m.video beyond today at 16:45 on ntv spend a lot of time on your f

is blushing for some reason, let’s listen to when president poroshenko addressed me about himself andleadership of the russian federation about the purchase of a pipe or a carpathian who owned this pipe for diesel supplies to ukraine and europe, he turned to me so that i could negotiate with the president of the russian federation, vladimir putin, so that transneft could to sell this pipe and in order to be able to buy back this pipe, as it turned out later, as mr. poroshenko found out, for years and years we simply expose, you know, the history of medvedchuk's pipe, you know, it's already some kind of narrative , you know, fixed, and we listen with our hands to the refutation there that from the administration of president poroshenko at the time. what from viktor medvedchuk , he told me that all this is not true, and you understand, and now for the first time in i don't know in six years of activity, so how much do we even talk about this topic we highlight viktor medvedchuk admits for the first time yes , it's me and the second he directly names the name of a person who , roughly sp

well, i have never supported poroshenko personally, but i am a little bit surprised by these methods,oing on in an attempt to deal with political opponents or what? so, thank you for your question. let 's go let's remember how in 2019 the immunity of deputies was abolished and how many experts warned that this is quite dangerous in the conditions of an unstable democracy, since the people's deputies themselves can become subjects, well, probably criminal-legal pressure, let's call it that for their political statements or activities there, in fact, what is happening now is a direct result of the fact that this populist decision was adopted in 2019, that is, i am not saying that the parliamentary immunity is, well, panatsevich, it is ideal , of course, it was necessary then limit it, but completely cancel it and give it if all the trump cards were in the hands of the prosecutor general. i think it is wrong , yes. i don't know in different cities where international conferences were held. these were delegates of different factions of men, including those who left here. the question is,

this is the story of medvedchuk and poroshenko right now.redirected to viktor burenko. an attack and we need to talk about something and it was expected. that is, we knew as soon as medvedchuk was taken that he would be uh, he would actually be uh, uh, promoted exclusively on one topic so that he would show that he is bad, bad and uh, he is uh- is this is a very bad, bad, bad man , putin's best man, and he is friends with poroshenko, that is, the evidence against poroshenko is not what was expected. we warned that good people, look, they will soon screw something up for medvedchuk so that he gives these revelations. well, here he is and he gave these demonstrations, actually, there is nothing new. it is clear that this is all dried up from the finger. it is clear that if the door is not clamped with fingers, but something else, then there will be no such indications. it's like there, but already dmitriev ii is with someone by the popes in putivla there in 1605, he would also tell us about it, uh, uh, because well, what about everything that

they even moved the broadcast of congratulations from the current head of state, petro poroshenko, withwhom kolomoisky was at odds, dear ukrainians. i promise you and you for the presidency of ukraine, but when zelensky came to power, he began to defend the political field, for example, a law on alligarchs was adopted in the president’s office, they explained that it should be the first step towards eliminating the oligarchic system in ukraine, that is, the most in which recent years held afloat the country's economic sovereignty is a self-player, and americans do not like self-players. hence the conflict arose between the americans and between kolomoisky and zelensky was involved in this conflict and he had to choose and he chose the americans did not stay in the country the time of akhmetov's relationship with the ukrainian power. in any case, the media looked very strained, there were even rumors about the preparation of a coup d'état. this information is specifically in order to draw akhmetov's war into an information war, he is already all against it. well, i don’t care what they t

uh, that's why poroshenko is trying to get in. because if she changes. ukraine, then the political situation, the political development of ukraine will also change rapidly. this is the same thing for you, how strange it is, you spent. yes, i also disagree here that the benefit of zelensky is the benefit of ukraine in the other direction. looked here. let's get into what not zelensky is afraid of something, but takes advantage of the collaborative situation. if you look at ukrainian politics, then everyone who gets to the top, one way or another, tries to destroy all political opponents in the received card balance. that is why yanukovych did what he did in jailing moshenko, therefore, in fact, poroshenko acted as he did here the situation is different in that zelensky is just a pocket, we are telling zelensky to remove the coup. so it's impossible. you see the united states has the main card here, they have promoted it to the whole world, it is the face of ukraine . still, i say it again. interesting, because i have already sharpened his face, and it is

the border, it is really strange such a nuance because everyone completely missed it except for poroshenko, who is the head of the faction, that is, the members of the faction they missed oleksiy goncharenko, he recently returned from davos, that is, he can be there as a people's deputy under the service of the people in june, i saw him in london more than once , it seems to them that he can be there flew to vilnius, well, that is, there was a nato meeting, it was supposed to take place, organized by nato, it was supposed to be about helping ukraine, well, that is, we understand. here, in general, it is very important in the diplomatic world to be toothless. it would be better to sit at home, well, my opinion is simple, well, well, maybe it is good on and there was a level of trust, because diplomats in world politics have high levels of very important personal contacts, well, what kind of personal contacts can there be with the top politicians of europe, well, with all due respect, well, although it is a market day somewhere push well, absolutely, but stefanchuk confirmed that he gave per

opportunity to take the meeting of the fifth president and the leader of european solidarity, petro poroshenko well, the representatives of the authorities are present at the meetings and he did not write about it in his blog, eh, yes, this is a telegram message from the verkhovna rada about the fact that the session has actually started and we know about it kornienko is present there. yes, i want to say that in our country, when we talk about the european union or the european union, as well as about ukraine's membership in nato, there are several important moments happening here that must be commented on with an expert. actually mr. volodymyr if allow me to ask you this question, do you believe that it is possible to join, for example, the european union without, at the same time, membership in nato? about the fact that it is possible to create some kind of alternative to ukraine with britain and other countries to the european union, for example, it was enthusiastically discussed in our country on all channels and on the national television, while it is interesting that besides in russia, i

poroshenko now for zelensky there is no accusing the former.he president of ukraine in corruption today himself starts his hand, signing a new law on confiscation of property, zelensky unleashed another redistribution of authorities, the law establishes a new type of sanctions through the collection of assets belonging to an individual or legal entity, as well as assets in which it directly or indirectly disposes, clear criteria are defined by which a person can be classified as one of those who are subject to such a sanction , it will be making money and remade the existing market in ukraine pay attention even to the example of the company med-invest from takmetov. it had co-founders of the russians, but had assets in the past the russian federation and who bothers to point out that these are actively under some kind of, and consistent control, everything where the confiscation will go is incomprehensible, but the experts are united in the fact that it is not for the good of the ukrainians. every now and then new video messages come from the m

he said so through daffodils well, what kind of narcissist is here, why is poroshenko here?l, in any case , let's talk about this and other things with natalia ligachova , media expert, head of detector media , editor-in-chief of the website detector media, glory to ukraine, mrs. nataliya, well, i just wanted to remind you today we had him on the air today imagine and together with him the deputy from the voice of solomiya bobrovska we just turned on the deputy from the servant of the people well directly i don't know from the race of daffodils for god's sake so what do you think lies behind that strange decision and why podolyak finally voiced the official for unofficial reasons, yes, it is meant podolyak voiced what were the people in the president's office guided by throwing out three tv channels from the t2 network although if the pro forma of ownership, well, the espresso tv channel does not belong to poroshenko well, why now and why, exactly, podolyak, uh, said well, really, what is uh, is not in the sense that there is narcissism, a narcissist, it's let the psychother

, we see that poroshenko left for rotterdam, where important international events will also take place today, but not at the nato parliamentary assembly we need to go back to this. well, we just drove by and all this is unpleasant, a very unpleasant thing. i myself spoke to journalists on the ground with some politicians who simply said that this cannot be during the war , especially let's put an end to this so that everyone is together and we don't quarrel. -e anya at such a personal level anya at the level of power all the more possible here unity victory yes the key to victory is together there is simply no other key and maria tomak head of the service for ensuring the activities of the crimean platform in the structure of the presidential representation of ukraine in the autonomous republic of crimea with us on skype, we congratulate ms. maria good day from the village of mali uh, how do i want to ask you right now, well, you know so much news. they are mostly from the front. but crimea is also a front, and besides, it does not come from agenda, more, more, he came back, and it see

poroshenko tried to cross the border at the border crossing.the russian ex-president provided the border guards with a copy of the order of the speaker of the council on may 24, while on business trips to participate in the parliamentary assembly of nato countries however, the border guards. they could not establish the authenticity of the documents, because they could not read qr code this afternoon, poroshenko again tried to go abroad. through the same checkpoint, but this attempt also ended in failure. at the beginning of this week, the russian currency became so heavy that the dollar-ruble scales fell to the level of february 2018. well, that is, in the days before the pandemic, when the american dollar could be bought for 56 russian rubles. and although by friday the bowls of these currency scales crept in the opposite direction and the ruble rolled back from its record values. it's time to remember the dark the forecasts of those western experts who, at first in the russian military operation in ukraine, began vying with each other to bur

that is, uh, well, poroshenko is the second option. he too, maybe it's a fight, firstly for his net worth. he will just hand out chocolates to me as a european official. he will negotiate to be rescued, if anything, this is not what his business was saving him for. he will head the government of ukraine in exile. and this is the second second option to negotiate and create exactly what he knows how to do just such a corrupt, some kind of government a mechanism that makes no difference where it will exist from. you know sergey viktorovich lavrov said that they would decide in the districts. well, the people of ukraine, that is, not the government, not zelensky , will decide if tomorrow lviv and ivano-frankivsk regions announce that they are the ukrainian state of lviv, frankivsk region, then what to do with these networks there, you understand what to do in amounts and poroshenko in this regard . he is a traitor in relation to zelensky, but it is quite possible that he carries 20 percent salvation for the ukrainian people now, that is,

poroshenko opened this new york after his defeat.i remember, it was already the twenty-first year. it was not not under his president. well then , all the more so, well then, all the more so very relevant, yes, and it would seem, what a good pr event. true, maxim new york opening under the throat. why do i remember, because during this period he reached the mice. well, uh, just out of curiosity. we ask the editors to install. by the way, yes, because , well, if in the twenty-first year they do n’t believe me, spiridon is so sure, but this is generally such impudence on the part of pyotr alekseevich , he is not the president, who he is not. you know what they say, maxim they say, impudence is the second happiness. well, yes, it's courage. yes, arrogance and so on. no. well, actually, what about new york, i can imagine how it is now. uh, western colleagues will beat this when well , obviously, the battles for her. yes, yes, they took the suburbs of new york, there they repulsed the attack on it. unsuccessfully, uh, tried to repel the a

petro poroshenko, well, he talked about certain matters. this is a completely political statement. confirmed by anything . to this statement that you were the first to start here, now this is the answer to you, in any case, this is not a healthy situation for the ukrainian political community, which should be united, but you should have written about exactly that on facebook, which is not worth it to repeat the mistakes of centuries ago, when our politicians were transformed, in the end we lost ukraine, well, within any boundaries, as a state, now how do you explain the appearance of this statement by medvedchuk, and was it the last one? obviously, this is not medvedchuk’s statement, medvedchuk is a scumbag who uh we remember that he was stus's lawyer, and we remember all his other unworthy and anti-ukrainian things, and therefore trusting medvedchuk seems to me to make no sense at all, but the question is not even about trust, but the question is that medvedchuk always adapts before any government, there was a communist government , stus had to be killed, and he found a lawyer in

poroshenko used medvedchuk's connections with the leadership of the russian federation to organize certain noseless schemes, and they were definitely not in the opinion of the security service of ukraine interests of ukraine, on the contrary , the economic economy and security of the state suffered direct losses from such actions, medvedchuk also named those involved in the procurement coal from the so-called lpr and dpr in 2014-2015, in particular, the then head of the national bank, valery gontareva , the first deputy of the bpp faction, ihor kononenko , the minister of energy and coal, volodymyr demchyshyn , were also involved in the scheme. from terrorists, even for cash , poroshenko's lawyer, ihor golovantsi, said he refutes , notes that medvedchuk's testimony about the fifth president is not true, it became a shame for his country, an employee of the russian diplomatic mission to the un in geneva, boris bondariv , resigned after a 20-year career in protest against the war as putin unleashed a corresponding letter in ukraine and sent it to foreign colleagues, in which he harshly conde

secondly, to poroshenko, located no less than to the zelensky poroshenko himself, as uh, walked, theye such walks. zelensky does not have enough arrogance and not enough resources to imprison poroshenko, but at the same time, we saw how difficult it was for poroshenko to go abroad, but he still went there. therefore, his patrons from washington patted and explained to zelensky. why is it important to release petr alekseevich fedor alekseevich is important to remind in ukraine is a defendant in a criminal case in the state treason and terrorist activities. under this from restrictions. the court imposed on him only the obligation to appear on time for interrogations. in connection with these events, zelensky's threat to poroshenko and his corruption crimes from the time of the election campaign. i'm your prok, that is, i'm your verdict is now sounding, it's especially funny how the given consent to the ex-president's departure to europe now would be better if zelensky probably did not take such steps, because he said, but we had to say and b, but hmm so like him failed. uh, real term o

in kiev, they are trying to accuse poroshenko of changing state corruption. the politician himself believes that the case against him was organized at the direction of zelensky at the border checkpoint, he said that he was going to the nato assembly, by the way, poroshenko is 56 years old, theoretically he can be sent to the front to leave the country, he, as a deputy, needs permission from the leadership of the verkhovna rada unprecedented pumping ukraine in arms significantly increases the risks of escalation of the conflict , our us ambassador anatoly antonov said in response to a request to comment on the information that appeared in the american media that the white house had decided to supply kiev with multiple launch rocket systems . we hope common sense will prevail and washington will not take such a provocative step, the diplomat said. his words are quoted by the telegram channel of the press service of the embassy. the joe biden administration approved the decision to send ukraine multiple launch rocket systems to this is reported by the new york t

-code this afternoon poroshenko again tried to go abroad.border checkpoint, but this attempt also ended in failure at the beginning of this week, the russian currency became so heavy that the scales dollar ruble fell to the level of february 2018. well, that is, back in the days before the pandemic, when the american dollar could be bought for 56 russian rubles, and although by friday, most of these currency weights crept in the opposite direction and the ruble rolled back from its record values. it's time to recall the gloomy forecasts of those western experts who first began vying with each other to bury the russian economy in the russian military operation in ukraine. well, first of all, of course, biden's performance comes to mind. exactly 2 months in warsaw ago, the american president said that the sanctions brought down the russian currency so much that for one dollar they now give 200 rubles. and now, for almost 100 days, russia has been living under the yoke of the largest western sanctions in the history, and for sure, it is already

plan marshall for post-war reconstruction with this goal, the fifth president of ukraine, petro poroshenkorotterdam for the congress and summit of the european people's party, this is the most influential political family in europe, its members are leaders of the structures of the european union and many member states, so poroshenko previously addressed president volodymyr zelenskyi with hopes that this trip will not be interrupted, it happened on may 28, then the fifth president of ukraine, petro poroshenko, was not allowed to cross the state border, he was on his way to the nato parliamentary assembly, although the composition of the legations was approved by the chairman of the verkhovna rada, ruslan stefanchuk , the state border service did not name the exact reasons for blocking the exit, they say, the border guards were unable to verify the authenticity of the document from the parliament, responsible neighbors, poland is ready to become a guarantor of security and peace for ukraine. the leader has already discussed with president zelensky, poland is simply obliged to do this, duda b

and it has already become the era, poroshenko and his slogan. army mova and faith.uded the following social machines. the next institutions, because indeed the army is the most important, implementing institution. yes, because you swore an oath to the country. under this flag, uh, there's a system of insignia. well, the whole army life reshapes your thinking in the whole society army one of the most respected institutions, of course, and here it has taken certain clear positions. and we also know how the army was changed. yes, we talked about it in general. here are these new standards, ideological. yes, then, uh, well, of course, absolutely total ukrainization, when, uh, this one, like a tail, was cut in pieces, so to speak. always, like a little bit, a little bit pressed, yes, in the end, we have already come to the conclusion that there is from the service sector, and which seems to be like a private sector. yes , completely ukrainian. i'm not talking about broadcast. uh, there is media content, all educational moments, and so on, and finally, they came to well,

pipeline in the western direction, medvedchuk claims that the fifth president of ukraine, petro poroshenko, asked contact him with the leadership of russia, and already in ukraine the head of the country ensured that the necessary decisions were made, the detainee says that he dealt with these issues precisely at the request of the fifth president, so that this pipeline became private property, and in fact it is the property of poroshenko himself, it is necessary for him to take a number of actions, the courts, the prosecutor's office the anti-monopoly committee, the state property fund of ksenia, took a decision that it is necessary for the personal interests of president poroshenko, first of all, it confirms that the ex-president, mr. poroshenko, used connections medvedchuk with the leadership of the russian federation in order to organize certain noseless schemes and they were definitely not in the interests of ukraine in the opinion of the security service of ukraine, on the contrary, the economy and the security of the state suffered direct losses from such actions, medvedchuk also na

e petro poroshenko and force poroshenko to work more closely not with akhmetov, but with valerich.turned out that no hatred turned out. poroshenko was such that he would have won even excuse me. uh, a toilet seat without a toilet. and if he had resisted poroshenko, he won faster, and he won on hatred, and then on him. start investing here.

secondly, to poroshenko, located no less than to the zelensky poroshenko himself, as uh, they will bend they are walking. zelenskiy doesn't have enough arrogance and not enough resources to put poroshenko in jail, but in at the same time, we saw how it was difficult for poroshenko to travel abroad, but nevertheless he went there. therefore, his patrons from washington were molested and explained to zelensky. why is it important to release petr alekseevich fedor alekseevich it is important to remind ukraine is a figurehead. a criminal case of treason and terrorist activities, while from the restrictions the court imposed on him only the obligation to appear on time for interrogations in the light of these events, zelensky’s threat to poroshenko and his corruption crimes from the time election campaign. i am your curse. that is, your verdict is now sounding, it’s especially funny how the given consent to the ex-president’s departure to europe now would be better if zelensky probably didn’t take such steps, because he said, but we had to say both, but the way he did failed uh, stand up f

e petro poroshenko and force poroshenko into closer cooperation not with akhmetov, but with valerich.ened was hate. poroshenko was such that he would have won even excuse me. uh, a toilet seat without a toilet. and if he opposed poroshenko, he won, and he won on hatred, and then into him. they begin , uh, to put in everything that was said before. they make it out of it. excuse me, but more advanced. and mikheil saakashvili to produce any color revolutions in belarus in russia in any other country, when he plays his role. e in ukraine and he i hope this one plays. uh, a special military operation will be entrusted to the end in that chic version, when the nazis will not negotiate with it denocification, his presidential speech at the inauguration is highlighted, and our first sacred task of ceasing fire in the donbass plunged not only into fire, it plunged blood, and not only the whole country, he acts with the whole country according to the principle. so do not get it, that he takes revenge on his own people, and russian troops come and remain peaceful. or he strikes not in russian a