so intelsat privatized -- in 2000, congress passed an act to privatize any privatized shortly after and intelsat is now a private company, publicly traded. it has at its own interesting cycle. i would argue that that period of comsat's privacy, genuine private activity and the creative drive that it was able to do for satellite services and satellite technology was certainly enabled the public-private partnership. the exit from that where the market no longer seems to need it, with pretty messy. there are a bunch of differences from a public-private partnership but i would say, the three lessons learned was that there was a clear purpose for both parties and clear rules, but that no longer fit the marketplace at some point, and holding onto that special relationships and the benefits it accrued ended up being a market distortion at some point. monitoring for the validity of those benefits is probably a a good rule of tumb. and figuring out what you would do, what the market looks like when the time has passed. so, that is my observation from the world that i saw. moderator: thank you ve

people in private equity are also in private credit. you are hitting on the supply and demand equation. $443 billion does include all types of private credit indirect lending, which is where we focus and what i have been describing in terms of risk-reward. that is a much smaller slice but still a large piece. in some regard, the notion there is a multi trillion dollar private credit opportunity is probably true. i am not expecting that is where we are heading in any foreseeable period of time but you are right to point out that private equity does give you some sense of the future potential of private credit. that is our customer base. matt: you guys will probably be going to super return, right? marc: absolutely. [laughter] matt: great to spend some time with you. thank you for coming in. sonali, always a pleasure to have you. blue owl co-ceo marc lipschultz and bloomberg reporter sonali basak. jon: we will be getting a lot of wall street at the movie theater, coming up soon. remember the gamestop frenzy? it is coming to hollywood -- c

we talked about public-private partnership.hose in the audience, you know, can you help us understand what you think about when you think about the public side of a cybersecurity partnership and how the public sector will need to change and -- and interoperate with the private sector? >> so at the agency our focus is identifying and trying to collect on possible threats to both public and private sort of infrastructure. we bring that information in and our analysts will take that information, will take open-source information, technical information to try to provide the best picture of the threat environment and then get it out to the folks that can actually use it. historically that has been other government agencies, you know, the war fire, diplomats, folks overseas but today because 80% of the critical information is in private hands, a lot of times it's those folks who are the actual folks who can use that information to mitigate the threat. we do have mechanisms to share that information we can sanitize it but we need to b

um uh probably to private life. i mean, how many, how many this is of course, they are in the interest of the kremlin. so the kremlin tried to maintain their operations in africa and latin america, et cetera. but the thing is of course, and we saw that in the russia africa summit where pre was allowed to access international leaders he's, i mean, prego was not a military leader, he was the salesman of, of the, of the company and the front man for, for the whole show and a part of these contracts and relationship with these regimes rested on his charisma. i don't know how relations will continue i guess some of these regimes still need russian assistance whether they come from or for someone else um for i guess some of these regimes still need russian assistance maintaining their regimes. but of course, um sort of the one of the not in the, in the relationships and with these relationships, it is about personal relationship and trust and knowledge um of each other is gone. but well with these relationships, it is abo

the private sector is here.should try to create a production, create added value, export, and from this, he can provide the width required by the government . the government should not focus on the width of oil and gas exports , and this has caused our country to have programs that were in the past. now i have the statistics from the research center. 3 past programs 1 and 88 achieved percentage. now we are writing a program. if that's the mechanism, that's it. nothing happens. that in the industry sector 8. 13 in mining , 23 in export and trade, we set targets in the program. absolutely nothing will happen with this mechanism. only the presence of the majority of the private sector, in my opinion, guarantees this success. very well, thank you very much. the equivalent suffix is ​​in the title of your commission. let's not ignore it . let us see a report and ask mining questions. in general, money has been poured here. this is a mine. neyshabur turquoise, the blue color you see here let it be clearly visible and

but it was found that there's the kind of private service from the state . privates states isn't select blake. what they are in the image. united states was it was a parade up in that rock during the war. so they were able to those things which states agencies the state structure. so i'm not able to do, i'm not allowed to do. so it was a very important difference point between wagner on precautions. business on state finance, by state state sponsored, but not office of and being part of the russian state. and now being transformed to the part of the rest of the state, the army states army trust sector on structure of some security service. but the deal with national and national does either the state on that. so we'll see how good or how well it will be. this transform ation. i'm going to work in how the whole business of bring was 12. i break is a very good thing because next year we have a residential presidential election in the united states or us and we'll be willing to help someone to win this election the game. and it's a crucial point as well because it's extremely important for

look at the private fools private equity and hedge fund manage tens of joints of dollars in assets.the end of last year pension funds and endowments now some retirement savers. private equity funds alone controls over between was incredible because i use that word sparing that we are between 15 and 20% of our whole economy private equity firms control that. that numbers going up every year. but all the americans to savingo savings are controlled by these firms have been able to get much information about how they're using people's money. they is comparable performance data, disclosure conflict of interest by fund manager. americans have in the dark about all of it until now. the private funds rule will change that thank you and force them to tell people how much money the private equity firms are charging. it should be no surprise the groups that complain the proposal was too strong, too hard to comply with an unnecessary, weighted only days before running to the venue of choice the fifth circuit court ngof appeals of course it's alws the fifth circuit the most extreme and partisan

the private funds rule will change that now and force them to tell them how much money the private equity firms are charging. no surprise that the groups that complained said this was too strong they waited only days before running to their venue of choice fifth circuit court of appeals. it is always the most extreme partisan circuit of america willing to dues shall interest bidding. same playbook we see over and over with wall street corporate interest trying to use the courts to go around the public. what of these companies trying to hide? trying to stop buybacks for one thing. that is why the sec buyback disclosure will provide much-needed data on how they have these resources. today other -- together they should encourage companies to stop throwing buybacks. they should start investing in their workers in innovation. under your leadership, mr. chair the sec took steps to implement safeguards under dodd frank. the first was proposing a rule or having interest conflict in the market. it sounds technical in the financial crisis of 2008 wall street banks bet against the u.s. housing marke

have big private pensions to the state _ have big private pensions to the state pension— have big privatessentially essential, especially- state pension is essentially essential, especially for. state pension is essentially. essential, especially for many state pension is essentially— essential, especially for many women because _ essential, especially for many women because they — essential, especially for many women because they tend _ essential, especially for many women because they tend to _ essential, especially for many women because they tend to have _ essential, especially for many women because they tend to have smaller- because they tend to have smaller private _ because they tend to have smaller private pensions. _ because they tend to have smaller private pensions. a _ because they tend to have smaller private pensions. a lot— because they tend to have smaller private pensions. a lot of- because they tend to have smaller private pensions. a lot of men - because they tend to have smallerl private pensions. a lot of men who david _ private pensions. a lot of men who david and —

if it is a lie private education — anymore. if it is a lie private education what _ anymore.ucation what is _ anymore. if it is a lie private education what is an - anymore. if it is a lie private education what is an ego - anymore. if it is a lie private - education what is an ego the full hog like segment and be in private schools altogether? that hog like segment and be in private schools altogether?— hog like segment and be in private schools altogether? that would be my dream in many — schools altogether? that would be my dream in many decades' _ schools altogether? that would be my dream in many decades' time - schools altogether? that would be my dream in many decades' time i - schools altogether? that would be my dream in many decades' time i think. dream in many decades' time i think that could be a reality in the united kingdom. you have to start from where they are. this is a question of fairness. is it for other private schools get tax breaks with max i think most people in the united kingdom will suggest that it's not. therefore to follow a leader that's prepared

with the secretary was to challenge private schools _ secretary was to challenge private schools to —o do more to support the state school system for the i think we need _ state school system for the i think we need to— state school system for the i think we need to see much more of that. the final— we need to see much more of that. the final point is, for universities we required _ the final point is, for universities we required them to do widening acts and other— we required them to do widening acts and other words if the set up how they're _ and other words if the set up how they're going to reach that broad talent _ they're going to reach that broad talent pool and bring it in. i think for private — talent pool and bring it in. i think for private schools i would like to see a _ for private schools i would like to see a much— for private schools i would like to see a much more comprehensive setting _ see a much more comprehensive setting will stop anecdotally, when i talk setting will stop anecdotally, when i talk to _ setting will stop anecdotally, when i talk to people these da

so the result, i look at private equity and say hey, 20 years ago, private equity was providing microcapue. you could buy a company at lower valu valuation, and that was a good thing for a portfolio. that's why early adopters of private equity earned huge premium returns for doing that in the '80s and '90s. but things have shifted from a value of closure of private equity to a growth enclosure. you have gone from 10% of buyouts being taxed to 40%. and you have gone from valuation multiples that were 40% below public market in the '90s. today, they are significantly above the s&p 500. >> interesting. so this is not the private equity of yesteryear. and it goes to show maybe waiting till growth is large is exactly the strategy. surprising and counterintuitive, although confirmed by the first half performance. dan, thank you for joining us. we appreciate it. >> my pleasure. >> dan rasmussen joining us. >>> kind of the perfect transition to my next guest who is a small cap value picker. we didn't even do that on purpose. sandy, that's like the perfect pitch for you. >> yeah, absolutely. i me

the system, somebody that petition because neither of these private companies, private companies have such a hurry. so could as much as you are on, on the, on the subject of his mind to, to, to go with such a political emissions because acute precaution development, quite strong political methods. and there isn't weeks and months even before the porch before this whole, think 2 months ago. so really to no one knows that political message saying, yeah, some of the russian citizens who have been congregating around impromptu memorials that have sprung up in moscow near the kremlin, but also elsewhere seem to feel, seem to still embrace precautions view that russia is not on the right track in ukraine and whether they are anti war or somehow pre, goshen, hardliners, they seem to be quite dissatisfied how. what do you know about public opinion? very little. i think that's also logical. solve as i'm barely reliable. and actually i'm a bit confused about the public reaction to, to hear staff because of the i've read a lot of reports and done sort political field studies done exactly at the

and far as a trophy project was found that the kind of private service from the state privates states isn't to like blake, what they are in the image. united states was what a separate defendant rack during the war. so they were able to those things which states agencies the state structure. so i'm not able to do, i'm not allowed to do. so. it was a very important difference point between wagner on precautions. business on state findings by state state sponsored but not the officer and being part of the russian state. and now being transformed to the part of the rest of the state, the army states army trust sector on structure of some security services, or the national national does either the state on. so we'll see how good or how well it will be this transformation, good work, and how the whole business of bring was 12. a break is a very good thing. because next year we have a residential presidential election in the united states or us. and we will be willing to help someone to bring this selection again. and it's a crucial point as well, because it's extremely important for us and

a private organization name, the goal and evolved. there is a very different organizations approved will kind of medi evil most from your organization. but not both sides have been increasingly dependent for the actual war fight and capability on private companies. and the fact is, once they've bought companies all the, you know, absolutely essential to war, fighting to campaigning, like cool, active, the goodness of that kind of site and how that company types place. and this is where is most controversy, images? well, exactly with this kind of dependency isn't the west essentially putting its own security or risk by relying on private companies to provide such a critical infrastructure as well? one level, yes, it is. and there have been various tensions in 2017, for instance, google withdrew from the, the us pentagons project and i even, which was an alger our algorithm project project. but they're trying to get all expression intelligence and targeting process. so yes, there is definitely dependence on the private sector organizati

i've got children private got six children in private schools. be there myself schools.and i think it's been a very important part of our nation's history and indeed made a huge contribution to our society . one contribution to our society. one of the fundamental principles of british democracy is the rule of law, statute law can only be changed by parliament and not at the discretion of other bodies. however important , the discretion of other bodies. however important, including the courts, if they're a bad laws, it's for parliament to change them. but today the rule of law seems to have been forgotten as a facility for the consumption of illicit drugs will be opened . glasgow city integration joint board approved the proposed pilot facility today that aims to provide clean and hygienic environments for those addicted to illegal drugs . the scottish to illegal drugs. the scottish government has offered £2.4 million for the project, in spite of the home office firmly stating that there is no safe way to consume drugs. but the broader point is that drugs are either legal

whether it is critical infrastructure mostly owned by the private sector or sectors of our private sector like in the technology areas that we need to focus on in order to help them protect themselves because they are of such importance from a national security perspective that we need to share information with them, help them see the trend, but bring them further into the decision-making cycle also so we are able to say howdy respond to these things, how do you think you make sense to respond to these things? because many people in the private sector and other spaces we are trying to work with have that are understanding of what is going to work, what is not going to work, how to think about these issues. of course you have also an incredible amount of information in the private sector that is valuable to us so we can understand the threat and analyze it appropriately and work with so many companies now to try to do that. it is a very challenging space for us i think to get into the right relationships and be able to share the right information, and it is not just about downgrading and d

what is your view of the private equity investment community?he most honest people you have ever met? kim: very nice people. i actually have been introduced to the world. a lot of my friends growing up are in this space now so i am on a group chat where i am being asked all the time about different companies and businesses, mostly tech that they invest in if they are good companies and i've gotten on zooms with founders to hear their pitches on their businesses as if i were them -- i work with them already, so i felt like it would be a good next step to do it together. david: jay, how did the two of you meet and how did you get into private equity and why do you specialize in consumer? jay: i started -- well first of all thank you for having us here. i started my career 23 years ago and had the privilege of spending the last 17 years working for you read i did not start investing in consumer businesses until i started carlisle but obviously spent the entirety of my time doing that and in particular spent my time trying to back high-growth consum

there is a debate on the amendment of the mining law, whose approach is to hand the private sector over to the private sector so that the capacity of the mine can be used to the maximum extent, and the issue of exploration, which is the heart of mining in our country. in fact , our exploration depth is about 80 meters. we have those machines we didn't go very deep. now, in this period, good measures have been taken, until 100, 200, and 2050. there are a series of measures, but the lack of machines in the field of mining is very serious in the same capacity that they are exploiting now. well, at the level of the program. seventh, we made good preparations to compensate for this deficiency in the law, in the case of car importation, heavy vehicles are also considered in another law of ours, in fact, the law of making one cloth as one cloth, and it is national information that different devices keep their information scattered . a centralized place where users can now go there refer and use this capacity and it did not exist. this law is one of the practical laws that have been implemented

and private credit will be ok if it is at scale so our private equities doing enough to invest -- likerivate equity firms now? sachin: you cannot look at major ones like that. they built an ecosystem where they have a flexible capital raising different kinds of capital. because they are mainstream, they are able to go where the action is. if it makes more sense to do private credit that is what they will do. we are seeing different changing investor allocations right now. with private equity secondary market it is picking up a little bit. there was a change in allocations. you have to look at it as mainstream firms that do a lot of different things. those are the ones that are breaking away from the pack. sonali: is there a chance this could be a broader shakeout in the industry? what is the private equity firm failing look like? you have blackstone stock on a tear. not everyone can beat them and to alix's point you have them diversifying. and you have players where you are facing a different model than what you are -- as you were talking about earlier higher interest rate and lower va

in the past three years, with regards to public-private partners. public-private partnerships. things like the fbi the national security agency. cyber command. they have all done this to reach out, have a number of different partners, interagency partners, international partners, private sector partners, academic partners. i think the power of our nation will be continuing to advance those partnerships to think differently about how we partner and to think about the outcomes, and we can't even imagine today the last one is people. i heard stan mcchrystal talk about public service. let me talk about public service. having been in military service for three decades and seen the ability to have an impact, i would continue to encourage public service. i see it in government, the peace, a number of places. i think our people are going to be the competitive advantage. whether it is public service or develop in a pool of young people that can operate in this digital age, we are going to need them. i am very excited about how we can do that. finally, as we continue to transition into t

that is, our russian private space company is developing if the investor.here are people interested in the project itself. and, of course, there will be a huge number of those who will use absolutely everything of your resources, and moreover, i will say that our investors are all russian, all this is assembled from 95% russian components, that’s right, if we are talking about rocket direction, this russian components, that you assemble the rocket yourself in your enterprise, as for satellites, the percentage of russian components is lower, but we are also working on this, therefore, and as for the rocket there, i say, plus or minus - this is 95% of the rocket. well, we have special areas where we do this. most importantly, i wish your company to develop, to prove that in russia there are, well, private space companies, because here we are a little behind our foreign colleagues. especially the american ones that's why. um, i hope we're proud. e. in your company like you, who are involved in space. thank you very much, because honestly, this is what we lack.

on the investment side, we partner with over 300 private funds. that's a lot of large and small asset management firms that have investors working with entrepreneurs, helping them get access to funding and to networks, so there are all sorts of relationships we need to grow and also our partnership with agencies we were -- we work with in the innovation program. delighted and looking forward to the opportunities and incredible stories that i anticipate we will see coming out of our recently-formed partnership -- or i should say growing our partnership with the defense department, our relationship with the office of capital. not only will be working on sbi opportunities together but now we are going to be alighting on investment programs, the sbic program, to create opportunities for private -- private funds to work with sba and get capital from it and provide support to the departments to help them get access to subject matter experts on these technologies that are critical to our national security to support american investment in technology such

i have often said private equity is the highest calling of mankind. why did it take you so long to realize and join the private equity world? kim: i finally got talk to it -- talked into it when i came to that realization. i've had a long-standing relationship with jay who came from the carlyle group and i was close to doing a few deals with jay when he was at the carlyle group. for 10 years we had conversations, whether it was through something we were going to do our people close to us were going to do and i was privy to those conversations. so we finally, you know, had the conversation that we should get into business together. it has been a fascinating process. david: the name of your firm is skky. yours is skky. how did you come up with that name? kim: we had to have a little bit of influence i thought. i thought ds for sammons and kim kardashian. it worked out, it made sense. david: you've been exposed to private equity for a little bit of time. you've met with investors here and around the world and so forth. what is your view of the private eq

but the labour party has announced that it would extend vat to private schools in its first yearif private schools in its first year if elected. but is this just the same old class warfare that we've always seen from the socialists? plus has anyone ever visited the great city of glasgow and thought what it really needed was a special zone in which the laws set by parliament were suspend, did and individuals were free to take illegal drugs. well that's exactly what's happened. and we'll be debating it shortly. state of the nation starts now . state of the nation starts now. and i've got a particularly pugnacious panel this evening. the former editor of the sun, kelvin mackenzie, and the former adviser to jeremy corbyn. james schneider, as always , i want to schneider, as always, i want to hear from you. you know what an important part of the programme it mail it is. email me. mail gbnews.com. but now it's time for the news of the day with polly it . polly middlehurst. it. >> jacob, thank you and good evening to you. well, we start this bulletin with the news that a 15 year old girl has died

now many insurances are privatized. but the general manager. i mentioned the banks. who determines the insurances ? my manager's manager went to the banks. some of them are formerly private properties. which is still somehow decided by your government. there are also a series of former state banks, yes. look, we said that you can even see the management desk, so pay attention to the definition. now, i could also read from... now, since your schedule is taking up time, i will find it and we said this there, mr. dolat, if you have government shares, report them. if you have management shares, sometimes you have a share, but this share is the you should leave the collection to mitch why give management to the people, that is , let's get to the point that, sir, the people of the private sector and the people of la can definitely run a business better than me. of course, let me say here again in parentheses that when we say privatization, it does not mean that we must give up the ownership. because here again, it is a discussion between friends, ownership or management. y

~ ., _ ., private schools? a labour policy for uuite a private schools?vate schools? a labour policy for quite a while now that _ private schools? a labour policy for quite a while now that they - private schools? a labour policy for quite a while now that they want i private schools? a labour policy for quite a while now that they want to impose vat on private school fees and also and the business rates relief private schools receive. the way they have always had for a long time they would do that is by revoking the charitable status that private schools have. it emerged last night they are no longer going to revoke the charitable status of private schools, so it is pretty embarrassing for labour. for a long time that has been a flagship policy they have clashed with the conservatives and private schools on. crucially they are still going to legislate for the controversial bit of the policy, namely that vat on business rates relief will change and private school fees may therefore go out and private schools have warned it might mean an exodus of peoples

army private king's strange trip to the

private schools, especially the private schools in the top tier, that they are able to take out of theiris on makin: businesses, as it were? my focus is on making sure _ businesses, as it were? my focus is on making sure we _ businesses, as it were? my focus is on making sure we deliver- on making sure we deliver against state education for every child, so we will be ending those tax breaks and putting money into state schools with more teachers and more support. the vast majority of pupils attend state schools, and they have high aspirations for what they want to achieve. today we have seen the prime minister against speaking and insulting terms about the aspirations of parents who send their children to state schools. he just does not seem to get that is a real pressure on the system right now, he's presiding over that and there are political choices to make, so the political choices of an incoming labour government would be to end those tax benefits and to put that money into more teachers, better mental health support and more support for our younger children too, that is the differe

we need the private sector to come in for the right reasons. not that they shouldn't make money, but we need them to come in for the right reasons and with the right risk profile. we need multilateral banks to work together. we need governance in countries to work well together. there's the issue of all shoulders at the wheel, is the message i would leave you with. >> well, thank you so much, president banga. thank you so much, president goldfajn. now let me ask you to get ready to sign the mou. if you could please help us with setting the table and we can proceed to sign it. >> this is a new way to do it. the table comes to us. >> exactly. yeah, because it's not ready. while it's ready, maybe let me just remind you that there are people connected in this live transmission. if there's a final message that you want to serve for them? >> yeah. while we wait for the table, let me give you a final message. >> yes. >> i like to think about us as the ones that implement stuff, that we go from the talk to the walk. if somebody would like to remember u

official that private king is now in u.s. custody.s is reporting from our colleague kevin liptak who says that private king was transferred from north korean custody to china. that is something that could be expected because of course china is an extremely close ally of the north koreans. we also have questions as to what role the swedes may have played. the u.s. does not have an embassy in pyongyang and the swedish government represents american interests there. for now we know after the north korean state media announced earlier today that private king would be expelled from pyongyang after an investigation, after admitting that he crossed the border into north korea illegally, we now have confirmation that is in u.s. custody. remember back in july he was supposed to be flying home to the united states to face more discipline after being accused of assault in south korea. he then fled the airport and went to the dmz on a civilian tour when he crossed into north korea on july 18th. john, we are now learning from one u.s. official tha

if you send your kid to private school. kid to this private school. that's me being unfair.unfair. >> our incredible in our >> in our incredible in our incredibly class ridden and unequal society, people are trying to purchase class advantage . advantage. >> and i understand that's what they're doing. but it's got nothing do with aspiration. nothing to do with aspiration. and tax it too. and it's right to tax it too. john in the pursuit of john but in the pursuit of self—betterment is a an self—betterment is a is an inherent human instinct. >> and to dumb that down is replacing aspiration with dependency. >> well, all views welcome on gb news, including yours at home. what do you make to the different opinions that you're heanng different opinions that you're hearing on this topic ? hearing on this topic? vaiews@gbnews.com is how you get hold of me . quick break. get hold of me. quick break. when i come back, i want to talk about us gb news. we've inadvertently become the news over the last couple of days. we'll be looking at it after the break hi there, michelle dewberry br

it's taking a while for those to be reflected in in private, private the private valuations in our inenchmarks and in in the manager of portfolios. so we'll see the impact of those valuation declines. you know, continue to be impacted over the next few quarters. i'd say that conversely, it's a tough market for to be an asset owner that will create what we think will be a pretty good vintage year for real estate in 2024. and 2025. and again, i think while there will be certainly will be distress in certain sectors, areas like industrial and residential areas that the plan has been active and will likely continue to be active. you'll certainly see some distress there. but we're not expecting widespread distress. i would describe it as maybe, you know, more likely opportunities to get exposure to asset classes, properties at a at a more attractive valuation, a better yields and an underwriting that doesn't require especially heroic assumptions to get to the target returns perhaps you know transitioning to the infrastructure sector where i'd say the story is a little bit more positive as

private schools.uch none send to private school. >> some did go to private school. >> exactly the point was going >> exactly the point i was going to make then having been successful themselves, they want to nobody else. >> why can't you go to private school? i went to private school. >> yep. >> yep. >> i'm the only kid here. i did. all right. >> my, we're to do full >> my, if we're going to do full disclosure, my kids go to the local comp and it's outstanding. >> this is the if you are >> this is the point. if you are lucky live near lucky enough to live near a really state school, then lucky enough to live near a real are state school, then lucky enough to live near a real are raisingte school, then lucky enough to live near a real are raising standards. .hen you are raising standards. >> kid live. >> for every kid i live. >> for every kid i live. >> i lived above a pub also. >> i lived above a pub also. >> can say waste of money? >> in my case i lived above. >> in my case i lived above. >> not at a

within the private family seize. the opportunities of new ways of and living together rather rigid gender roles. people may begin to care for each other as comrade, replacing the private family kitchens or take out from local. people may gather protest kitchens can and group meals care for children. the injured and others unable to work becomes a shared concern of collective projects of survival. family abolition. a horizon of human freedom one briefly visible. the barricades of the oaxaca commune. the family is a limit to human emancipate and the family's horrors are vast. its abuses widespread, its logic coercive. the family is a joy for some a necessity for most, and a nightmare for far too many. behind its closed doors. the household is. a gamble. children born into abusive households have no recourse from harmful parents. those trapped in abusive couple relationships recedes there see means of escape gradually off by manipulative and controlling partners. those working class adults who wish to be a part of a chi

you can privatize, please privatize. go to chenya., when dickchaine became director halyaberton, its subsidiary entered into an agreement with the american the government was the first to give a contract for supplying and supporting the activities of the us army . the us defense team of george bush gave several very important positions in the pentagon not to people in uniform, but to civilians. these were top managers of corporations that were part of the us defense industrial complex and on september 10, 2001 delivered a keynote speech. this was the day before the terrorist attack, and he stated that his main task as minister. he sees maximum privatization of the turnover sphere. frankly, those of us who was in the military department, who saw what was happening were very concerned about this, because we knew that either you privatize the entire apparatus, or you are entering very dangerous territory, this applies not only to those contractors in a real war, say in a war with russia or china, which will suddenly say ha, we won’t work

and there were private ones there.unately, there was no ministry of industry and trade. it's me i think that it is precisely for these types of aircraft that we are talking about that we will not be able to do. uh, master import procurement without state participation hmm, because it’s even difficult for me to explain how to master the production of any aircraft spare parts. uh, and what costs must the enterprise incur in order to actually certify it for use in this aircraft, that is, crazy money and time, so some kind of simplified scheme is needed at the moment, and hmm, mandatory state participation, that is, support from the ministry of industry, industry, and so on. here we were at a meeting. your idea of ​​how things will move forward is the death of that point, i very much hope so, because uh and even based on uh, last. vladimir vladimirovich’s speech in which he said that if the federal air transport agency continues to manage the development of aviation in relation to unmanned aircraft in the same way, then we

whether it is critical infrastructure mostly owned by the private sector or sectors of our private sector like in the technology areas that we need to focus on in order to help them protect themselves because they are of such importance from a national security perspective that we need to share information with them, help them see the trend, but bring them further into the decision-making cycle also so we are able to say howdy respond to these things, how do you think you make sense to respond to these things? because many people in the private sector and other spaces we are trying to work with have that are understanding of what is going to work, what is not going to work, how to think about these issues. of course you have also an incredible amount of information in the private sector that is valuable to us so we can understand the threat and analyze it appropriately and work with so many companies now to try to do that. it is a very challenging space for us i think to get into the right relationships and be able to share the right information, and it is not just about downgrading and d