i mean, richard dawkins himself is a good example of this. she's extremely dogmatic about certain things and i think that this is very bad for science. a lot of believers in scientism occurs religion, so being dogmatic, but in my experience, most religious people, i know not told magics. i'm and anger and myself and they're usually quite monday, but many people who believe in scientists are incredibly dogmatic. so i think this situation is almost the reverse of the standard caricature or housebreaking matches your experiences in india. and my history led me to believe that western world tends to be more detail oriented, more focused on the incremental r, as opposed to let's say, some of the eastern approaches we see details as part of a bigger hole. do you think scientists, the way you see is primarily latin creature, or is it more universal? well, we have exposure to the rest of the world of trouble in china is, you know, officially, atheist and officially materialist. it still has marxist ideology. and so there's a huge country with an enor

i mean, richard dawkins himself is a good example of this. he's extremely dogmatic about certain things and i think that this is very bad for sons. a lot of believers in santos them appears religion, so being dogmatic. but in my experience, most religious people i know not told magics, i mean anger and myself and i have monday. but many people who believe in santos are incredibly dogmatic. so i think there's a whole your experiences in india and my studies. my history led me to believe that western world tends to be more detail oriented, more focused on the incremental ours as opposed to, let's say, some of the eastern approaches we see details as part of a bigger whole. do you think scientists, the way you see is primarily latin creature, or is it more universal? well, we've explored to get to the rest of the world of trouble. china is, you know, officially, atheist and officially materialistic still has a marxist ideology. and so there's a huge country with an enormous importance in the world which is being converted to western type, hey li

years ago in late september i had a chance to interview my intellectual world the time. professor richard dawkins, author of the dod delusion and one of the world's most renowned atheist also happened to inspire a whole lot of books read the word delusion in their titles in moving by the way yours. we have to give professor dawkins credit. he's done more for the soul searching movement than the most have. well, i think by pushing for which is uncompromising into aggression base years. and so to provide an argument for very true sponsors. the title of my book wasn't actually chosen by.

ago in late september i had a chance to interview my intellectual bureau of the time. professor richard dawkins, author of the god delusion and one of the world's most renowned, the atheists who also happened to inspire a whole lot of books with the wars delusion in their titles, including by the way, yours we have.

ago, in late september, i had a chance to interview my intellectual world the time professor richard dawkins, author of the god delusion and one of the world's most renowned atheists who also happened to inspire a whole lot of books rewarded delusion in their titles and moving by the way, yours, we have to give professor dawkins credit. he's done more for the soul searching movement and demo.

the time professor richard dawkins, author of the god delusion and one of the world's most renowned atheists who also happened to inspire a whole lot of books, read the war, delusion in their titles in meeting by the way yours. we have to give professor.

institutional religions decline from a court replaces it is not the role of secular reason with richard dawkins daniel and the new atheists sitting arounde making rules for everyone without reference to god, that's not what happens. institutional religion declines, you get the institutionalized forms of spirituality and religious beliefs that are moreu consumer oriented, less theological and less to go back to the quote you started with, strong moral impact on the lives of the people who practice them. so you go from a world of billy graham and martin luther king and sheen, leading figures of american religion to a world of joel o'steen and oprah, prosperity gospel christianity and new age spirituality. one thing i tried to do in the book take the prosperity gospel and new age seriously, i don't think that kind of religious stuff is just superficial and s empty, i think it has actual theological ideas people find appealing for our recent fundamentally i think to go from a world of reasonably strong christian churches to a world of hyper individualized spirituality presided over by these figures

that as institutional religion declined whatt replaces it is not the rule of secular reason with richard dawkins and all of the other new atheists sitting around and making rules for everyone without making reference to god. that is not what happens. institutional religion declines you get d institutionalized forms of spirituality and religious belief that are more individualist in many cases. are more consumer oriented, are less theological and have less to go back to the quote you have less of a strong moral impact on the lives of the people who practice them. you sort of go from a world of billy graham and martin luther king and fulton sheen as leading figures of religion to a world of joel o'steen of prosperity gospel prosperity one thing i tried to do in the book was actually take the prosperity gospel in the new age spirituality seriously. i don't think that kind of religious stuff is superficial and empty. i think it has some actual theological ideas that people find appealing for a reason. but fundamentally to go from a world of reasonably strong christian churches to a world of hyper in