secondly, the kurds want maximum autonomy in iraq. with the entities. we are going to see new alliances emerging. that will be tricky be)]x nobody will get them much of anything on kirkook. needing some to make these new coalitions against each other. they are going to give something, they have to do. i see a lot continue unhappiness up ahead on that thought. >> thank you, sir. thank you for your presentation today, sir. my question is looking at the nineva province. since the soony-lead gathering took power earlier in the year, there's been some serious scrapes do you see a need for a mediator? if so who? >> there's definitely a need for mediation. this has occurred on different levels. let's take it all together. the various parts of the government and parts of the army and at the military level. the areas where the police operate. >> calling for deployment of the u.s. troops. now the need seems to be the greatest. sufficient willing back and forth all the time. trying to calm things down when there's a little spatnp operati and going into control. it

. >>> first off, he wasn't hurt and secondly police ruled out alcohol, but when the most famous olympian is in a car accident in the town that raised him, that's news. jerry johnson is live with what happened last night. sherrie? [no audio ] >> we can't hear you, sherrie, so we'll come back in just a

secondly, as a result of european stability, which is under the financial stability regime until the irish commissioner, there we support the new rule book that is going to be drawn up by the european banking system. we will be part of that system, and rightly so. individual institutions will be regulated by our own financial services authority. but i think it is right, not just throughout europe, but throughout the world to seek a common set of global rules and standards, that financial institutions operate in many countries have got to follow. we are right to be part of the europe january system, but we want to see it as part of a global system in future years. >> it seems to be forgotten that the cancer in the banking crisis, which destroyed confidence in the system itself , in attempting to rebuild it, can you reasure the ordinary citizen that refashioning the banking system will result in one in which people do have trust and confidence in that system but also feel they are getting a fair deal from it, which they do not feel at the moment? >> i understand that. the behavior of b

secondly -- [applause] secondly, i have a friend who a few years ago, he -- he retired from the house of representatives -- i would recommend that we quit all of this talk about this health plan . can you work it so all of the american citizens have the same health plan that those have on the hill? i'm sure your father, the doctor, would think that was a good health plan for us all. thank you. >> well in the consideration of the bill before the various committees on my side and the republican side, we tried to deal with that question by saying if the public option were part of the program all members of congress would be required to be in the public option. in one committee it was adopted and the other committee it was voted down. i don't know if it'll be in the final package. it seems to me that mechanism where people have options to make choices that -- that we have as federal em employees as do all employees is one american people ought to have. i would expand it beyond the four option. i think we have four or six options, beyond that, by allowing americans to have access to the di

secondly, with respect to those who have an inability to get insurance.we ought to be able to establish a i program to assist that. others say we provide the hem care plan. there are various ways to do it. are you asking, will i prefer a reform? absolutely. do i support anover haul to the secret, i do not. >> brian, would you ask the law enforcement people if at 8:30 i could go outside and talk to whoever is out there? i topt know what they'll allow or not in that time. i'll be happy to go out there if they will allow that. ok. >> following up on the last person's question, if looking at the healthcare reform, the nodes are many, the resources are relatively few. my concern is that we have somewhere in the neighborhood of 12-30 million illegal aliens in the united states. that number -- even l.a. times says in california we have between 6-6.5 million. i could not find anything that discusses the care of illegal aliens. can you say we will not be funding illegal aliens healthcare out of medicare and medicaid currently in california? i know we are spending

and secondly, you know, we predict as k.r.g. that iraq will not survive beyond an american troop withdrawal, because baghdad is totally dysfunctional, state institutions remain weak and incohesive, and there's simple knoll will to resolve the conflicts between, say, the insurgents and the maliki, or even through maliki and the supreme council, and then the sadrists out there. it's just too much of a mess. they're making the assumption that it's too late, we cannot reach a compromise even if we wanted one. we've tried, it didn't work, so we need to look elsewhere. and then what's the second best? it's turkey. nobody likes turkey in kurdistan, but it's better than baghdad, it's better than iran, it's better than syria, we'll have to work with it, live with it, and then there's europe and the united states beyond. i'm not -- i think it's a dangerous assumption, because first of all, iraq is not lost. i certainly would not want to say that. and secondly, if you take the position, that means you definitely don't want to compromise. s

secondly he said he's a good cop, a good guy, we'll have a beer. originally, he suggested that maybe the sergeant -- >> you are not giving obama the credit he deserves. >> i am giving credit. >> having that mess on his hands, he managed to extract himself right out of the picture. >> and became suddenly gates versus crowley. >> you haven't seen anything like that since the nixonian days. i mean, the layout of the whole thing, bringing biden in to further diffuse anything like obama being pivoted against them? >> he wishes he had never done it. >> it's political genius. >> it's embarrassment and disaster. it's damage control all the way. >> then he goes out and the president says i've learned that they met between themselves before they came out here, meaning that they are going to settle it. it's right over there. crowley's a world figure. >> akazmy award. this is better -- academy award. this is better. >> as much as you want to say he extracted himself, they made decisions about president obama based on this last ten days. and i don't think -- i

secondly, secondly the administration has been trying to do what you are saying.how can i talk with you yelling? i don't understand the mentality that yelling like this is helpful. all of you, i don't understand those who interfere with a conversation, the point is this, obama has met with the health insurance industry and pharmaceuticals and hospitals. >> [inaudible] >> i'm sorry, ma'am, that is what you said. you just said he should meet with them and try to negotiate -- i apologize this is not rational -- >> [inaudible] >> in the hospital industry -- the other point i want to make when you talked about the people in the private sector who got money from the financial rescue program, we have been tough on them and i got a bill passed through the house on the friday before we left to cut down substantially on the irresponsible bonuses they are getting. we will be curt schilling the top executive pay and the only other thing i would repeat is i don't want the government totally out of health care because medicare and the children's health insurance program for exa

[applause] secondly, his true. -- it is true. you may have those that presidents are not dictators.they were about to vote for the old policy by margins exceeding 80% in the house and exceeding 70% in the senate. the gate test boats to send me a message that they would reverse any attempt on the executive order. let me remind you that the public opinion is more strongly in our favor that was 16 years ago and i have continued to support that. [applause] the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff under a new was against letting gays serve, is now in favor of it. this is a different world. that is the point i'm trying to make. let me also say something that never got sufficient publicity at the time. when colin powell came up with that policy, it was defined while he was chairman much differently than it was implemented he said if you will accept this, here is what we will do. we will not pursue any one, any military members out of uniform would be free to march in gay rights parade, go to gay bars, go to political meetings. what ever mailings they get or whatever they do in their priva

secondly, who says what is appropriate? well, apparently, frank from virginia, they do.nd they are also pointing out that being broke is no excuse. as a teen in high school, i worked in the retail stores. but i still had to wear a tie and be neatly dressed -p on the sales floor. it did not matter how long i was on the sales floor, i had to be dressed properly when there -fp -l like it or not, that gentleman's appearance makes a station about your station and your program for everyone that sees him. well you know what, i'll stay more on the casual side of this argument. i just don't think that everything has to be the button down to be taken seriously. for a guy that runs the teleprompter says that our good friend tom here, as long as his jeans are waste high and the big polo shirts are hole free, i'm working to -- i'm willing to work with the bother. keep them coming. >>> that's our report. i'll be right back here at 11. don't forget, you can log on any time you would like to wusa9.com where we are always on. moms know kids need calcium... but they also need vitamin d to

but the two big surprises i learned with the stone fbi file was the sheer size and secondly because ifiled my freedom of information request july 1989 i got my last document 2005. the freedom of information act is a wonderful lot and even better if it was in force. but i got lot of material in the early 90's. one thing that i noticed and i did not understand was the fbi started daily service aliens in 1962 on i.f. stone. "i.f. stone's weekly" was started under daily fbi surveillance they followed him everywhere he went. he even took a trip to new york and followed him to grand central station and the men's room so plays know they do not extend him going into the men's roomy got a pretty good sense of the best chinese food and jewish deli is that his or her like to get takeout they even gave the names of the shops but i did not understand why. it was really only with the release of the program at the national security agency where they were intercepting cable traffic from the soviet missions from the united states in the forties but they did not decrypt these transmissions until the 19

secondly, by getting a higher level envoy like the former president of the united states, it does helphe north koreans in their legitimacy, and it is a demonstration of direct negotiations with the united states, which is what they have always demanded. they are getting it. they got a lot. they have proudly gotten stuff that we haven't heard about and we may never hear about, aid in food and oil. all of that stuff will happen quietly in the future, but it was a hostage ransom. no question at all. bret: mara, the white house insisted that the former president was not carrying a message for president obama, despite what the north koreans said in their release that, in fact, he was carrying a message from president obama, but there is no one in washington who believes that this was not coordinated with the national security council and the the secretary of state, his wife. >> is would be unthinkable that you would send bill clinton over there without knowing he would come back with the women. that would be a disaster of epic proportions. however, i think it is still not cheer exactly what

secondly, i will tell you my personal expense.hat first day on vacation in vancouver by has been will cope with a terribly swollen foot and it turned out to be his first attack of gout which he had never before had. the hotel concierge arranged the employment with us for dr. on wilson street which is the equivalent of a doctor on park avenue here. beautiful office and we got seen quite a way. the doctor's been quite a bit of time. but only examined him and told him what was wrong and gave him medication and a device he could use to walk around vancouver, but when it came to paying the bill -- they said $15. i was very embarrassed. i said we are not canadians, but americans. they said we know. and if you were a canadian it would be free. when my husband -- when mike son was in a certain city he never paid a dime. now we're sending a granddaughter there and god forbid they should get sick, but should the issue will be sick. the canadians work after the ending of their government is not bought and paid for the way that arses and that

>> because, number one, you're using the wrong time of drug, and secondly, you're negligent in taking care of him. >> that's right, nancy. and if this criminal negligence rises to the level of just something so reckless and out of control, then he is looking at possibly manslaughter charges. >> very quickly, a 5-year-old little boy afflicted with cerebral palsy braces on his ankles missing. take a listen. >> authorities in oakland, california, are searching for clues in the case of missing 5-year-old hasani campbell who is disabled with cerebral palsy. >> police say around 4:00, they received a call for help from the 5-year-old boy's father. he told officers he drove the son to the shoes of rockridge where he could leave the son in his mother's care. police say the father says he left the boy in the bmw of the back lot of the store while he walked around to the front to unlock the door. when the father opened the store's back door, he told police his son was gone. >> i feel responsible for this. >> immediately, there was this -- five or six cop cars right after that. it was pretty qui

secondly, we're running ballistics tests on those guns to see if they've been used in previous shootings. third, if there is a gun out there that has some significant historical value, and we do know that there are a few that we collected that do, then we'll probably be doing something to render them safe and work out some type of an agreement with museum, such as the legion of honor museum we have in fresno, getting those firearms to them. >> it's really interesting. tina in our facebook page wanted to answer that question you just answered, can you trace them back to crimes. sounds like you're using ballistics to do that. that's a good thing. let's get another call in. tom's with us in north carolina. how are you doing? >> caller: good. enjoy your show. >> thanks. >> caller: you do a good job. just wish we didn't have so much bad news. >> yeah, you and me both, tom. >> caller: i tell you, i'm an absolute avid believer in our right to bear arms. don't ever get me wrong. i'm 30 years military, fought all over the world. we have the right in this country, and it was a given right. but wha

secondly, somehow we have to have an adult conversation with beijing about the fact that we can all wk and chew gum at the same time. we can fight over things and still work together. the chinese want it to be all or nothing. we have cases with the europeans on very difficult issues all the time. it does not impair our discussions with the europeans on a whole range of issues. we tend to, whenever we have a trade fight with the chinese, find out that the chinese will not show up for meetings or talk in the meetings when we have them. their noses are out of joint. the chinese have to learn that in the real world of global trade politics, you cannot -- you can fight and talk at the same time. and again, purely diplomatic reasons, we send another signal to beijing that we do not want to upset to hear you will retaliate. we enable that dysfunctional behavior by the chinese and we should avoid that. >> bruce is right. rightly or wrongly -- and this could be bipartisan here -- a decision that goes along bowlines of bush administration, which i would support for other reasons, would feed into

secondly, there's been a lot of talk about health care reform. there's only one piece of real reform in this bill for health care. there's a couple of pieces of insurance reform which are worth doing, but the only piece of health care reform that's worth doing left is the public option. the public option -- [applause] >> people say can't there be a compromise. we have already compromised. the public option is the compromise between the single payer and the private sector. we can't go any further. there's nothing else to do here. if you give away the public option, you have no health insurance reform and we ought not to put the next generation into $60 billion worth of debt every single year. just get rid of the bill, do insurance reform, guaranteed community rating and call it a day. we need the public option. if anyone is serious about real choice for the american people, we need the public option and we're not asking to put our stamp of approval on what americans have to do. we're asking this. let the american people reform health care. we know

secondly, it seems to me -- and what you're looking for?secondly, it seems to me that we are always want to have arguments about medical care costs that have skyrocketed. at the same time, we do not want to stop the high quality that we have. how do you do it? there are those that believe that the best way to change what we do now is to have government funded health care. i do not think that we need to do that. ultimately -- [applause] [applause] as i say, there are others that disagree. the way that i analyze this is that if you were trying to have some way to keep cost down, there are only two ways to do it. you have a government run system and you do it by rationing and i will give you examples of that, or you can try and have greater -- all of us have he should know what the success rates are. that information should be available right away. you ought to know how much they're charging. some hospitals may charge differently than others. that arms us as individuals to make decisions. we are talking about cooperatives and that might be the

secondly was in the social safety net.strong supporter of social security, extending it to the disabled and medicare and children's health, but he took it way into the great society which created a culture of dependency which ironically had to be undone by a moderate democrat president clinton. in that speech that we saw, the most famous he ever gave of the dream will never die, that was not a speech given against reagan or a right wing, it was given against the moderate jimmy carter. he represented the extreme liberalism in a sense, and in a sense, that's why the democrats were denied the white mouse for almost all of the last -- the white house for the last 50 years with the exception of clinton and carter, the likes of whom kennedy opposed. bret: bill, do you think that the old-style politics around personality and relationships is over? >> in a word, no, but teddy kennedy also challenged the sitting democratic president, jimmy carter and i approve of that since it made it easy foreronald reagan to beat him. so that is

and secondly and this is the other side the interest rate makes sure there are enough resources act ofhysical resources available in the economy to complete all the relatively long term projects businesses engaged in. well, when save more and restrict consumption temporarily this law was the interest rate. we put our money in the banks, this pushes interest rates lower. the banks have more land so to take a short cut the price of living goes down, just common sense. well when we do that that indicates we're postponing desire to consume in the future and number two because we are postponing desire to consume we are releasing resources in the economy for use by these longer-term projects because if we are not going to be producing as many immediate goods the factors that go into producing the goods are really stand made available for longer term projects like research and development or manufacturing or mining, expanding mining capacity. the reason the interest rates encourage long-term investment should be obvious. the longer term your investment is the more interest matters. if i have

and secondly, what goes through your mind when you imagine something that norah was talking about, and that is bill clinton debriefing the white house and the cia in terms of what the situation is right now with the amo pyongyang leadership. >> first of all, i would like to be in the room. that would be a hoot just to hear that. but bill clinton and most of all, and i know the president and he does wonderful things all around the world with his foundation, but i think for all of us who leave office, the question is, are we still relevant, can we still make a difference in people's lives and i think the president is feeling a great sense of reward here in a sense that he's help freed these two young women, i think he's probably personally elated number one. number two, i think he will be a very good respondent in providing information to the obama administration about the issues that you raised. i think a lot of us americans who love bill clinton still feel good that he's being put to great use. >> i know governor rendel that you also love politics, so we're going to turn up the heat on

secondly, in terms of qualification, there are more qualifications for this job than virtually any of the prior three nominees that i have heard as a member of this committee. 29.5 years in law. prosecutors, private practitioners, appointed to the federal court first by a republican president, secondly by a democratic president. the analysis of her record by the congressional research service says an interesting thing. the most consistent characteristic of her approach as an appellate judge has been as an inherent to the doctrine. she has done a splendid job, with dedication. this has been probed and picked at, but i find no example of infidelity to the law. at this time, would like to place in the record a sixth circuit court decision on a matter like the fire fighter case, where the circuit found exactly as she did, if i might. >> without objection, so ordered. >> i found no example for not following precedent. for me, as a woman, to see this woman overcome the barriers that she has overcome, for the dedication and personality brought to this table, it was truly impressive. i believ

secondly they have the doctrine of originalism.ey claimed that we shouldn't go beyond the law if you don't know the origin tent of the framers of the law. tell me thomas jefferson's position on abortion? i am sure he hm a well thought out opposition to abortion or other issues that didn't exist in the 18th century. the constitution exists of some glittering phrases, due process of law, equal protection that exists in modern reality. you can look at origin tent in modern reality, but nevertheless it is an appealing thing to say, and they have claimed a mantle for it. liberals or nominees, we have only had two presidents, only one nominee for the supreme court from this one, but we have only had two democratic presidents in the last 40 years or so. and they have nominated moderates. breyer and beginsburg -- ginsburg are moderate. now, we have to start emulating what they did. we have to seize -- we have to show how their being activists is against the elected rules of government. i think they have a number of goals now which are very

secondly, there are trade issues. you can not design a program that benefits domestic manufacturers to such a great extent that it violates international trade bloc periods -- trade law. and if you benefit one and got the other, not only do you have the government picking world winners and losers -- there is a lot of concern and effort to get things like you were talking about into the program, but they were not accepted for many of the reasons we have already talked about. this is a fairly delicate balance. host: san antonio, texas, albert, on our democrats line. caller: my question is, on this thing they are trying to get rid of, what are the requirements? some would say that you have to be insured for one year, others will say that to get $4,700 off of it -- they do not know what the rules are. guest: the reasons the requirements are as stiff as they are is that the designers of the program wanted to get the apples off the road that were being used. if you take a vehicle of blocks and buy a new car, you do not have

secondly, the administration has been trying to do what you are saying.ow can i talk with yelling. and to understand this mentality. -- i do not understand this mentality. obama has met with the help insurance industry and the pharmaceuticals and the hospitals. i am sorry, ma'am. that is what you said. you just said they should meet with them and try to negotiate. i apologize. this is not a rational conversation. >> [unintelligible] >> the other point want to make is when you talk about these people in the private sector to get money from the rest to program, but a bill passed through the house on the friday before we left to cut down substantially on the irresponsible bonuses they are getting. we will see curtailing top executive pay before the end of the year. i do not want the government totally out of healthcare. i think medicare is honorable. the children's health insurance program for example is a good one. people said it was socialized medicine but has reduced the number of uninsured children. >> thank you for coming out. you said we would be allow

first and foremost, by getting these two individuals out of jail and back home and, secondly, it maythat north korea has a message for the new president about what it's willing to do in terms of coming in from the cold, from the isolation from the world, and i don't think there's any harm done here. on the contrary, i think that the families of those involved and the journalists are going to see -- offer a lot of thanks to president clinton for being willing to make this trip. >> jamie, our colleague at nbc says his sources are telling him north korea got what they wanted in that they get acknowledgment and they have obviously a popular former president on the ground there. how does this move forward with what we've seen today? >> first of all, when the journalists are home free, that's the first step forward. secondly, we'll just have to see whether north korea had something to say to bill clinton that will get them away from their nuclear status they gained in the bush administration. >> the senior source says they like being a player, whether it's diplomacy or arms sales. we're se

secondly, they know that only takes a second. >> the british press are talking about the fact that only inkling can win this test. nothing is impossible, we know. do you think the australian mindset is that it will be a draw? >> i think it is. that is what helton said to us yesterday at the close of play. he said australia had reverted to plan b. it australia were really thinking they would win, it would be a daring thing. to. they would have to score quickly. i do not know. i still think a in england win is possible. they have to score 150. that would be seen as an impossibility. now in the era of 20-20, that would be seen as an opportunity . >> i think i will be watching thank you . much more is coming up. all the latest on iran and much more on business. the latest on iran with the supreme leader endorsing mahmoud ahmadinejad as president for another four years. you are watching bbc "world news." >> funding for this presentation was made possible by -- the freeman foundation of new york, stowe, vermont, and honolulu, the newman's own foundation, the john d. and catherine t. macarthur

secondly you're the judge in charge of the court and the public put their trust and confidence in you that you're not going to do stupid things. >> so far 'sheot n said anything about what happened. >>> police are issuing michael phelps two citations after crashing his vehicle last night. he was driving his black cadillac escalade through an intersection when a honda accord hit him. phelps is being cited for driving without a license and failure to establish residency in maryland. he moved back to maryland after the 2008 olympics. >> john edwards taking a dna test to find out if a baby born to his former mistress is his, but what will it prove? >>> thousands are told to leave their home as out-of-control wildfires cut a threatening >>> former senator john edwards may be ready to admit he's the father of a campaign worker's child. last year he admitted to having an affair. he's denied fathering her 18-month-old daughter. but according to news he'll indeed admit he's the father. >>> eunice kennedy shriver was remembered today as a fearless warrior for the voiceless. she was also remembe

secondly to heat stroke which includes rapid pulse, difficulty breathing, and even hallucinations. if you want more and eat safety, including local cooling centers, log on to our website, wjla.com. >>> and metro worker was killed on the job last night very officials say the 25-year veteran was struck by a track unit spreading gravel on the tracks betwe dunn loring station. metro is promising a thorough investigation. >>> a new report is out raising questions about metrobus crash- avoidance system. a glitch in march ended in may near-miss but it could have had consequences as it did three months later on the red line. matt brock got commuter response. >> metro's safety is in the headlines again. >> i hope they can work out. >> over the weekend, there was another close call near the potomac avenue station back in march. one train was headed for another rare and collision for if not for the train operation, there would have been a crash. there were 500 feet apart. it was a safe distance. the trains riders were offloaded and the train was taken out of service immediely for a follow-up

secondly.n you turn on that red light and ask me a question, it is sometimes helpful to say honestly, i do not know the answer to that. most politician, leaders think that they are required to give an answer to which they do not have at their disposal at that point but they won't say i do not know the answer. it has always been my approach, number one, not to feel obligated to that little red light, but then if, you ask me a question to which i do not know the answer, identify a responsibility first to myself,, but i have a responsibility first to myself and then to the view viewers to say i do not know. tavis: i try to do that myself. when did -- when did -- how did oratory become so important to you and as a black man, would you define to me the difference between being told that you are articulate and that you are eloquent? >> see, i think the two are exchangeable. tavis: you do? i get opinions sometimes. people say he is so articulate. he is eloquent. not just articulate. as if negros shoul

and then secondly the banks start kicking in money as they turn profitable, the fdic increases theirestored. it only took three years between those two items. >> chris, premium increases on the bank. now the last time we spoke, you weren't all that optimistic about the economy. sheila bair is saying this a lagging indicator. we have a steep upward slope in treasury curve which should help banks. they borrow short of zero and no longer had a considerable net interest rate profit, et cetera, et cetera. but, regarding what bill isaac said, can banks take this sort of tax increase you all are describing? >> can they take it? sure. is it going to take them longer to get back to normal? it will be if they have to pay more to run the fund but obviously we can't let the fdic fund go bad. >> we can't let any deposits default. that's what you're saying. that's the bottom, bottom line. we are guaranteeing that and that's the deal and it's the full faith and credit of the u.s. government as skeptical as some people are about the u.s. government. seriously. >> no, look, i share some of your conce

secondly, i have to correct a couple things that were said early on. you do not have to go through security on a domestic flight when you're at a diversion airport. only an international flight. and secondedly, no call was every made to the airport by the airline asking for those passengers to be allowed off the plane. so from my understanding, today, and all of the conversations i've had, there was no attempt made. now, what the passengers could have done and what we advise them to do, call our hotline. if they do, and they're stuck, we will call the airport manager ar get 911 or resources we need to out to the plane to call them. our outline is on our website, fliersrights.org. they can get a petition of people who want off the plane and say we've had enough. then they can also warn the flight attendant or flight attendants, in this case, only one of them. in a half hour we're going to do an appropriate nonviolent revolt. what other passengers have done in this situation is they've banged the baggage bins and stomped their feet and been very, very lo

secondly, the chinese government has a domestic problem. >> you see the number generation of tibetans may not be as patient. they may not take the midway approach. >> there are growing signs of restlessness among tibetans outside and inside. the younger generation that the situation is very bad for them. there is much resentment. however, they have to follow the instruction of the dali lama. after that, we should have a free hand. >tibet will suffer. the chinese government will feel much embarrassment. there will be no benefit. no help to solve the problem. >> the bbc has shown the interview to the chinese embassy in london. they declined to make any comment. >>> it is their job to protect and serve the public. what happens when the police. the law -- what happens when the police break the law? this is a question of growing currency in russia. investigators are preparing to put a policeman on trial who is accused of murder. according to their own statistics, russian police committed 2500 crimes in the first six months of the year. we have this special report from moscow. >> it is late

secondly, what is the financial impact? will have you to pay to commute? will have you to pay for daycare? what's the tax implication? will it push you into a higher tax bracket and air not making as much as you thought? finally, are you going to have to pay for any equipment? there are some legitimate call centers where you can work at home and take calls but you have to have a designated land line for $25 or $30 a month so you have to work five or six hours just to pay for your equipment. >> also it can impact your quality of life of course. when you look for moonlighting positions are we talking about bartending or restaurant hostess or waitress? are there other opportunities? >> it really runs the gamut. for somebody younger, it can be a bar, restaurant, baby-sitting. for somebody older usually an extension of what they do on the job. so an i.t. person maybe helps people set up home computer equipment in their home. >> let's talk about when you take on that second job and you look at the time that you put into it. you're saying put a time limit on your

you start with that secondly and more importantly, i think he's in an absolutely impossible position. if he were to approve the pay as presented, then he'll take an awful lot of flack as will the public in terms of the rates approved. if he turns down the requests and lowers the amounts and the companies don't perform, they'll blame him saying the taxpayers have lost because he didn't approve a competitive pay structure. either way, it's -- i think -- a bad idea. >> suzanne: considering the fact he's in a tough spot though, what do you think his likely findings are going to be? >> the metrics he uses probably will be similar to the metrics the banks themselves used in creating the compensation packages. my guess is a lot of the stuff gets approved. you have a bureaucratic process, if you will, for reviewing the pay. it was created by a bureaucratic process to begin with it's interesting, historically, judges have always had the power that he's had to overturn pay yet they've almost never used that power because their views, it's impossible to appropriately predict. they, instead, rely

secondly, the chise government should consider it it a domestic problem. >> but you are polical as wellyou see the ynger generation tibetans. ty may not be thapatient. they manot taktheidway approach >>es, there are growing signs of frustration among tibetan outside and inside. there is reason for worry. the younger generation feel that t situation is very bad for them. owever, as long as the dlas, remains,- as long as the dalaiama remns, they must listen. >>> it is their job to prect and serve the public. whatappens when the police. the law and theovernment fails bringhe problem under ntrol? that queion is bng asked with gwing urgency in russia. we have ts special repo from moscow. >> it late april in a supermarket i southern moscow. the pice chief has just walked in with a gun. he is about to start shooting. this woman manages a raculous escape. as the staff for their lives, three lie dead. six others are seriously wounded. he wasne of them. he s shot twice in the back and stomach. h is still recovering. he sll has a bullet fragments lodged near his heart. >> my view of the police has

secondly, the way this bill was originally set up.here has been many versions but the original way was that congress is not going to define and benefit package and it never was. it makes no sense for them to design the benefit package. the benefit package is going to be designed by a separate panel that will be set up, so the people who have injected this issue into the debate are people who are trying to sidetrack the bill. this was not an issue in the debate, because everybody who was in congress knew that the question of reproductive rights was going to be addressed when the benefit package was designed by an independent panel, presumably appointed by the president or the secretary of h.h.s. more likely. the debate we're now seeing, in my view, ought to be handled not by putting language in to prevent access to reproductive health care, but by letting the panel make that decision. the panel is likely to be a panel of fairly distinguished health care providers, i would guess, and some people in the other associated industries, what

government in terms of civilian coherrence and secondly how to what expect the new strategy is considering the importance of looking back over the past several years, learning the lessons of coordination with our allies internationally and how the new strategy is going to help leverage and encourage and create the opportunities alex mentioned. then lastly how are we going to take advantage thf election and how will this strategy create opportunities for renewed partnership and new contract with the afhgan people? and welcome. >> dave. >> i was hoping you would put that to alex. >> alex. >> i will touch on that a bit. i think on the u.s. side, that is a -- an immense challenge, a bureaucratic challenge. the bureaus of the u.s. government, the departments, are strong organizations. the majority of them are focused domestically overseas and really are not part of their core mission and core culture and they have been responding. some i think deserve great praise, the department of agriculture is an example. they are generating a sizeable number of people for afghanistan. that is far beyond wh

secondly, i think she reflected a fundamental value in that family that all her brothers and sistersext generation shares, the idea if you are given a lot in life, then you owe something back and you have to give something back. and she found something to give back that was so extraordinary that it literally transformed the lives of people who before had just been thrown into back rooms, put into institutions, left alone. she gave a real meaning to the right to life in the sense that she understood that these folks, with intellectual disabilities, had a right to a full and decent life because of her, million of them are having it. >> i think with her passing and is senator kennedy in very, very di difficult straits, the kennedy clan as we knew it, grew up with it this family we have grown up with -- >> the royal family of america. >> since 1960 all the way up, and i think that sort of ends. i really don't and i have seen the younger folks and carolyn had a rough time there in new york, i don't see the next generation -- >> you have maria, tim, mark shriver. >> do you see them as unit

secondly, richmond wanted to evade service. when the 20 negro law is passed newton knight and his friend a jasper collins basically have a conversation in which they agree this law makes it a rich man's war and a poor man's fight. as the phrase went. so jasper collins is another subsistence former church reformer who is the term, and jasper throws down his gone and says that's it for me, i'm going home, not fighting in this war. he's older than it newton knight, he looked up to jasper collins and very quickly was in a matter of days newton knight throws out his gun to he is down, he is finished and desserts. several men from jones county a flat desert after the battle of corinth and a return to their county where among other things their wives are beginning to start because there are no mental health of the plow the fields or 10 the livestock and in the meantime the confederacy has also enacted a policy called tax in kind. tax in time it meant the confederacy could come to your hargitay cure worse is, your corn, the cotton at a

secondly, these lobbyists in town, they can write checks, they can't get out ten people. a lot of these conservative groups in washington, d.c., let me tell you, they're miffed. they're all chiefs and no indians. very, very few of them can get people out. i tell you what's getting them out, probably talk radio and cable tv, and everybody, you know, alex, we have been consumed with this, the arguments get heated here. and i think that's reflected there. but, again, you know, congressmen ought to decide what is best for the country and then you ought to say what do my constituents believe? what do they want? are they right? are their concerns justified? and he can get ahead of that room. and he knows that this is organized nonsense. >> okay. i've been told to wrap. julian, if you can hold onto your thoughts i've got you back in just about seven minutes or so. that man pushing his son pushing his son was put up to anything that's a man who's got some passion and understandably so. all right you guys, see you in just a bit. >>> the skies in california are roaring to life. the

secondly, i don't know what a few cia agents are saying, but i will tell you, i think the agency as a remains firmly and strongly dedicated to this mission. beyond that, i don't want to comment on what the justice department is doing vis-a-vis -- >> let me ask you whether you agree with what the vice president, the former vice president, dick cheney, said that he thought that these were political steps, political prosecutions and he feels that the obama administration has now proved that it cannot secure national security, that it cannot be trusted on national security because it is going after these interrogators. at least respond to that charge, that our national security is compromised by some of the decisions that have now been made. >> well, i just disagree with the former vice president on so many things, so i'll just add that to my list. but that process will be under way. it will be led by the justice department. but the cia's mission remains in tact and i think that the energy and the perseverance of the agency toward that mission and our agency toward that mission remains in

secondly, healthcare, they believe this reform is going to take away benefits they have. i tell you, as exhilarated by these democrats, calling them un-american, harry reid calling them evil mongers, other people calling them mobs and thugs. the backlash against the democratic party here is astonishing. middle american by 2 to 1, they agree with the protesters and not with the democratic party. >> eleanor. >> first of all, cindy said to shout down over people views is un-american. they didn't call the shouters un-american. i think the president has lost momentum here. people who have insurance are worried that they are going to lose something in this very extensive package. and the president really doesn't have a single bill that he can point to. he doesn't have a clear message and all of the bills floating around on political provide lots of inviting targets for people who want to kill healthcare and want to kill the obama presidency along with it. the political stakes here are huge and the president has done a good job with the special interest. they are all tentatively

secondly, they confessed that some of their own employees violated those guidelines. perhaps most importantly of all they concluded that they can't say these enhanced interrogation techniques lead to unique knowledge that could not have been gotten by other means. so that cast a light of doubt on these techniques. >> abernethy: many thanks to shaun casey of wesley theological seminary. >> abernethy: in other news, fallout continues after the nation's largest lutheran denomination, the evangelical lutheran church in america, voted to lift its ban on non- celibate gay and lesbian pastors. the vote came at last week's e.l.c.a. assembly in minneapolis. some lutherans who opposed the change are now debating whether to leave the denomination. some are also withholding money. e.l.c.a. presiding bishop mark hanson pleaded with conservatives to stay in the church and keep the dialogue going. we have a profile now of bill and gloria gaither, the legendary songwriting and performing couple who have had enormous success in the world of christian gospel music. bill is well known f

secondly, it reflects a much worse economy than most of us have been willing to admit.nd third, it means that we have got to at some point become serious about holding down spending. the government is vastly overcommitted. and now we're talking about a whole new arena of spending associated with health care and the rest. this has got to end at some point or we're going to have real, real problems farther down the road. >> bob froehlich, the deficit, a reason not to invest? >> no, it's not a reason not to invest. two things to keep in mind very quickly. first of all, the federal government can't get right what's going to happen next month and we're supposed to be worried about a forecast for them from ten years from now? we're going to think that's a joke in itself. but secondly, i think the issue is the government spends too much money, but it's not just the federal government, it's the state government, it's local government, i think we have to put a cap on spending. that means we could lower taxes, that means we could give money back to people, goodness sakes, they co