simon shuster and his article, the fact is that simon shuster is exactly the scenario when there is noet in his homeland, that is, it is about what, many ukrainian experts on the topic touched upon shuster in his publication, have been talking about the past few months, that is, both shurba and mine theft. well, there are many other moments, the growth of mistrust in the government, due to its failure to respond to blatant cases of corruption, and in this sense, shuster, as, well, an irritant for sure, he turned out to be a prophet, from the side that set some accents for the ukrainians themselves, because ukrainians had some doubts, so to speak, about the reliability of the assessment of certain events by ukrainian experts, and now this publication in time seems to set the final accents, i would say, that it affected the bank itself the most, and nervousness arose there due to the fact that simon shuster was taken care of, warmed up, made almost the main... a journalist for communication with the western media sphere, we recall, as a cnn correspondent, they were carefully pushed out,

this is not the first article by journalist simon shuster about ukraine. man for more than 15 years, worked in russia and ukraine, made reports from both countries. in the 15th year, he wrote seemingly incriminating articles about the neo-nazi movement of the azov regiment. in april 2022, the journalist spent two weeks in the president's office, where he communicated with zelskyi and his entourage. after that, tyme magazine published an article about zelensky, and his photo appeared on the cover. in june 2022, simon shuster announced the publication of a book dedicated to the current president of ukraine. in the same summer, volodymyr zelensky awarded the author of the material, simon shuster, with the order of merit third degree and i suggest to return to valery zaluzhnyi's article for the british edition of the economist, which caused a real resonance not only in ukrainian society. so, let 's see how our commander-in-chief sees ukraine's victory. in the british edition. economist valery zaluzhnyi published three materials at once , the commander-in-chief

other for a long time, allow me to clarify something, and yes, the first is, ah, an article by simon shuster, which, from my point of view , to the question about we say, in principle, it is not, there is no relation, because this is such a public, artistic-public thing, and i am literally analyzing today... the situation, why it was necessary to write it in such a way, i realized that it is all- all the promotion and preparation of the reader for the release of the book in december, under the conditional name of zelenskyi, i have not spoken to anyone but you about this topic, because you are the author of a similar book, which, well, it is rare today in the world to find a language into which your book about zelenskyi is not translated, i am just saying that we understand , that simon shuster solved his questions, besides, and there are a number of things, ah, which, well, let's say this , made up, fantasized, ah, well, although, if desired, ah, ukrainian journalists are much more accurate wrote about the same things, and i would recommend paying attention to them, because everything is lai

simply quoting the material of the american magazine time, written by the american journalist simon shuster, the journalist talks about the current stage of the russian-ukrainian war, that the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyy, allegedly feels betrayed by his partners, and because of... a counterattack on one general responsible for him and one of the ministers is awaiting dismissal, which means publication in such a respectable american magazine, exactly such a text and such a tone, and what this material says about ukraine, about the president and about our war. in fact, there is a lot of discussion in ukraine on social networks, i haven't read everything and so i will repeat what i said from the beginning, as soon as i got acquainted with this material, eh, apparently it is now working against ukraine, despite the fact that there is a positive in it , which attracts attention, once again in such a publication as the team, there were those who expressed that this is not such a publication has already become popular, as before, nothing like that, it has popularity, i will say this,

worked in russia for 15 years, yes, this simon shuster said that the maidan was a violent seizure ofazis, but this is all purely russian propaganda, so that’s it, this muskalik gather up the golik, bring the next one, if you look closely, he is not like that, he is not that nimble, he will probably also demand that the order of the third degree be returned immediately. okay, but let’s assume that everything is not so, that everything is fine with zelensky, and then, as zaluzhny called it, he comes out, and the article, firstly, is the very fact that a high-ranking army official, well, de facto commander-in-chief, not supreme, but de facto commander-in-chief, gives an interview, this is blatant stupidity, because every word uttered by this kind of people is analyzed, considered, and what is said there, well, first of all , this is insulting to the west, because it is said that the doctrine that was written, read by foreigners and based on their understanding of the art of war is absolutely vicious, that they can neatly fold all the textbooks and throw them in the trash, vladimir vladi

states for a long time, well, maybe, let's say , i have a broader worldview, so i am more than simon shuster, who is based on his american experience, i think that he is a sincere person, in no way is he a moscow agent, but he, of course, he can write what ukrainians can consider, well , not in any... view, but what he writes is that in the office of the president, well, someone something said, look, american journalists keep writing that in the white house, someone said something, every day, these are all kinds of leaks, that someone said something, that someone doesn’t believe something, this is the style of journalism, it’s just normal for the united states, very much, mr. igor, igor eisenberg was with us, a professor of new york university, i wish good to you, well, it's still morning for you, yes, well, have a good day. yes, but it's already evening, we will summarize the military results of the day and week. serhiy zogrets, director of defensepress agency. sergey, congratulations. i congratulate you, vasyl, i congratulate our audience, indeed, today we will talk about what happened dur

and you will receive exceptional answers with documents, with surnames, on all questions that simon shuster writes, because his language is language designed for below average. and the western reader, listener, that is, what is in everyday life is used as materials for persuading a neighbor, an acquaintance, for conversations in the kitchen and so on, and congressmen, mr. roman, maybe it was aimed at morally unstable congressmen or rednecks from the republican, trumpist environment, so we understand what a big debate is going on now , and here... you see, he threw his spoon, the intellectual level of parliamentarians, whether ukrainian or american, we understand him well, we know, because as the classic of ukrainian politics said, the parliament is the face of any nation, it is enough to understand that including this article was used to add or subtract arguments, but... but as for me, a person who has worked in the parliament for 15 years, there is no evidence, materials, there are conclusions that i can better make on the basis of the materials, as i have already said, and in particular y

him and president zelenskyy so the chemistry between him well, that is, there was, i would call simon shusteron for the president, well, let's remember that many people in the world, and directly including us, admire the president, his position, it is impossible not to respect his position, even these articles, if you look closely, you can't help but admire his direct belief in victory and what he plans and does, he will do everything for ukraine to win on the border of 1991, in general, and his positioning in ukraine, well, it's not you can not respect, but in relation to who he is informed, again, again from my point of view, it does not matter, moreover, i think it was not a former, adviser. lieutenant colonel, because i know from the first sources the attitude of simon schuster to this lieutenant colonel, he treats him, let's say, with disrespect, let's say it this way, he does not consider this person, this lieutenant colonel, as a person who should be listened to, he understands , that this person, she is very , well, how to call it, as a girl at the age of 18, very prone to change of o

they wanted from this journalist, i.e. they perceived time as the only impression telethon, and simon shusterrov, because what they told him and how they shared all these insights with him. the impression was that they expected a necessarily positive result, and of course, the cover of the magazine as it was last year, and not as it was this year, that is, there is dissonance in this as well, just to me it seems that the president's office does not lack the power of the word, which is carried by american journalists and this magazine, even more so, on the eve of the hearing in the senate and in the congress. of the allocation law money for an additional 105 billion for israel and ukraine. how do you perceive it, that this magazine is published at such an important time and, in principle, a conversation begins about the fact that, well , let's now discuss the victory plan for ukraine and this one, what is it in this plan, what does it consist of? well, to conclude, i will say that it is really not so... simple, this is a task of communication, information work, it should be done professionally

procedure there, but less so, in that article there is such a moment that one of the interlocutors, simon shusterinians from the president's office, says that they are preparing... for this winter and are worried , they are preparing for this winter and are worried that shelling, suspect that shelling from russia will be even stronger than last year. at this moment, few people paid attention, because they began to focus on other points, to analyze the biography of this simon there, when he worked , what he wrote, he once wrote about azov there before the full-scale invasion, some bad things there, and so on, that he lived in he has been in russia for some time, that he is brought up there, that he knows the russian language, but nevertheless, it is not simon who is speaking, it is his interlocutor who is from the president's office who is talking about the fact that there will be shelling russians, we see such a certain respite, this night there was an attack by the shaheds, but compared to what we have already experienced , it is so more or less non-threatening, what do we have to prepare for, w

general of the army, let's go back to the analysis of this strange article by simon shuster, the reactiondanilov, the secretary of the nsdc, who proposed to our law enforcement officers, who among the president's entourage does not believe in victory? well, first of all, it should be noted that indeed the article to some extent undermines the positions of the leadership of our country, but this is the subjective position of the journalist, that is, he had, accordingly, some sources of information, today we do not know exactly which ones, but not those that strategically determine the prospects of ukraine, this is not a position, for example, which ones he would have known exactly and had an interview with, for example, with the same fair, and especially, i would emphasize with with the leadership of the cabinet of ministers and especially with the leadership of the general staff, for example with the same hard-working , for example, commanders, such as syrskyi, or ternavskyi, and also inzhdai, but just then there would be a clearer approach, there would be an objective, clear position, bu

well , simon shuster also writes that recently volodymyr zelenskyi's relations with his allies have been worsened by the issue of corruption. in september, on the eve of the president's visit to washington, the white house prepared a list of anti-corruption reforms for ukraine, but these were not proposals, quoting the publication of one of the president's advisers, these were conditions. i will remind you that the documents with the action plan for kyiv were published by politiko in early october. among the demands were judicial reform, de-oligarchization, transition of the ukrainian army to nato standards. the head of the president's office, andriy yermak, on the ictv broadcast, then called this list recommendations. he says, until the visit to the union. the states did not know about the document, the president has not yet commented on this material. mykhailo podelyak, adviser to the head of the president's office, in an interview with radio liberty said that simon shuster's column is, i quote, the subjective point of view of a particular journalist. i don't understand at all what ano

flown from there, to my opinion, but i may be wrong, vladimir vladimirovich, you understand , simon shusters he spread a bravura report about him everywhere about his shooting. from machine guns and so on, and in general, of course, it’s indicative, i honestly missed this zelsky’s decree about awarding shuster an order, and only the third degree, apparently he was offended that only the third degree, but but it’s very symptomatic, yes, no one in the west wants to ask a question, yes, but if journalists write such pretentious reports, yes from kiev from ukraine, and then the ukrainians who shout the most get paid for it, catch, catch. this bastard who leaked the information, this is him and there is, keep in mind, so when danilov says such things, yes, we will catch them and punish them , you ask when was the last time he spoke with simon... schuster, and what about finding out the problem, or what? i think that zelsky should just invite specialists to take a lie detector test, you can do it directly, everything is there, it’s all captured by zelensky’s great idea to build a live show, every

who a... the author of this article, who is the author of this work, to analyze his activities, simon shusters not only a native of moscow, a person who worked there for more than 15 years, as in ukraine. and in russia at the same time, he stated in his certain interviews that he loves russia very much there, he loves moscow very much, in his materials he called azov a neo-nazi organization, he went to crimea, bought such pessimistic articles, regarding the extent to which ukraine has any chances in confrontation with the russian federation, so if someone there followed his materials, the general tone of the material that he released in the time is not a surprise for him, therefore, in the aggregate from the personal the author, with those anonymous sources who gave comments, unfortunately, of course, we can't just tell everyone, let's ignore this material and let's cover this story with something more vivid and constructive. thank you, mr. maksym, thank you, maksym nesvitaylov, expert an internationalist, joined our broadcast, spoke, talked about one of the top topics of recent times, materi

it is noteworthy that journalist simon shuster, also a fan of trips to kiev, wrote the material and apparentlyster who was the author of the article in april of twenty-two, which painted the image of zelsky as the savior of the world from russia. i received wisdom that i never wanted, said the president of ukraine. the comedian-president was so inspired by working with the american correspondent that last year he awarded shuster the order of merit , third class. but now the new love of the west and the united states, israel, is very awkward to go through. as they say, from a wise man to an empty place there is only one. year, that's what shuster wrote now. vladimir zelensky is deceiving himself and does not see that kiev is losing in the conflict. the ukrainian president's faith in victory worries some of his advisers and borders on messianic. some of zelsky's advisers say his stubbornness is hampering his team's efforts to develop a new strategy, a new message. while they argue about further options for the development of the conflict, one topic remains taboo, the topic of negotiations to con

another had something to do with the preparation of this, this publication, which, by the way, simon shuster, whom the president will remind. at one time, zelsky was awarded an order for the fact that he wrote two highly favorable articles about ukraine and about volodymyr zelenskyi himself, and actually through shuster's efforts and precisely as an illustration of the publication, president zeletskyi has already been on the cover of the magazine, the oldest magazine in the united states, three times, but the third publication is certainly not so comfortable, and shuster himself, by the way, said that it is one of the most difficult publications. throughout his journalistic career, and simon schuster is one of the most famous american journalists. well, gentlemen, in the meantime, i have the following information for you, we already said that yesterday we celebrated ukraine day missile troops and artillery, this holiday was founded in 1997, in the conditions of the aggression of the russian federation, these self-soldiers showed their strength, power and endurance, but reproaches. not the re

in large letters and an article with a similar sentiment, it is noteworthy that the journalist simon shuster lover of trips to kiev, wrote the material and apparently saw the light. it was shuster who was the author of the article in april of twenty-two, which painted the image of zelensky as the savior of the world from russia, i received wisdom that i never wanted - an order of merit of the third degree. but now the new love of the west and the usa, israel and this is very awkward, as they say, from a sage to an empty place alone. this is what shuster wrote now. vladimirsky is deceiving himself and does not see that kyiv is losing the conflict. the ukrainian president's faith in victory. puts some of his advisers to rest and borders on messianism. some of zelsky's advisers say his stubbornness is hampering his team's efforts to develop a new strategy, a new message. while they argue about further options for the development of the conflict, one topic remains taboo. the topic of negotiations is to conclude a peace agreement with the russians, and corruption has not gone away. against the ba

and one more thing in this article by simon shuster is when an anonymous source from the president'sice tells him that they are preparing for the fact that russian shelling of this land will be even stronger than what we saw last year. mr. oleksandr, how much do you think russia has reduced its shelling, of course. that they are preparing, how many missiles could russia have accumulated, and could russia have received missiles from someone else as a gift or for money, and also, what is this number and from whom, well, cruise missiles, i do not think that they received somehow a gift, but in terms of production and intensity of strikes, i will say yes, and this winter komikatsi drones will prevail, not winged ones. cruise missiles, cruise missiles, they will be of a secondary type, there will not be more of them like last year, cruise missiles, but they will be a booster element, that is, they will be replaced by shaheds, which production, if we are talking about hasta 1,555, they can about two missiles to produce per day, that is , after the last shelling, on september 21, which took

united states of america, they heard what zaluzhny said, what zelensky said in the article. or simon shuster, have they heard in ukraine what zaluzhnyi says and what zelenskyy says, because communication with society is too important so that society understands that this war will not end today or tomorrow, and that it is necessary a large mobilization resource, which, by the way, the same lazy person talks about, it is necessary to rearrange the economy and put the obvious economy on the military rails, why do you think... there is no such serious conversation between the ukrainian authorities and ukrainian society, this is a huge problem, you know, i still i will draw such a difference between the article in time magazine and the economist, he is diligent, he knows, well, in any case, he thinks, and he gives us his opinion, he answers the question, what does he think? still need to be done times, it is necessary to do, an article in the magazine time about the fact that zelensky simply believes, faith is very important, faith is not, well, an extremely important part of success, but you can

liberation of kherson, please tell us which we should work on as a society after all, omitting some of simon shuster’svaluative judgments, taking just to pay attention to work, to work, in your opinion, is there anything to take? ms. tetyana, vadim, first of all, i congratulate you, i congratulate all our dear viewers, yes indeed, the article of time, shuster, it really caused a great resonance in society, we have to admit this, and, but it actually, moving immediately to the conclusions, it in my opinion, it is quite subjective, when i also reread it, as soon as it came out, i also had huge questions regarding those anonymous people who commented on the behavior and reactions of the president of ukraine volodymyr zelenskyi, according to me, this journalist could have relied more thoroughly in his conclusions, in his article , on analytical and more on official sources, why not ask about certain events from the head of the office andriy yermak, why not ask the same scumbag we just saw, how he commented on this article, and the time journalist, with all due respect to this very solid publication, made

that opposition, in the office the president, to the president, who was actually almost named by simon shusterin a famous article , about the fact that the office of the president is almost at odds with the president, because the president wants to fight and they don't want to fight, they want to make peace, that's pretty serious ... seriously know the sign of such a crisis, when maryana bezula is used to say that zaluzhn does not have a plan, and the ogonomist plan is not a plan, you need to present a real plan, how it will develop: the war next year, maryana bezula does not understand at all what a military strategy is, what is a military plan, she cannot understand, she came from civilian life almost at home as a housewife, in order to be able to have the right to compete at this level, and you need to go through , well, complicated enough training, it is not enough to go to the front, so she acts clearly from on behalf of those who are in the opposition today. to the hostage, who really intended to remove him from office, and simon shooter writes his articles about this, and president zele

to ukraine, but also to our western allies, and on the other hand a rather strange article by simon shuster, not a journalist of the first rank, but the article caused the effect of ... the explosion of a certain information bomb, you just got into the top ten, using the term different here, in fact, if you look at them with an experienced eye, then they are very far from each other, because this is the depth of research, and scholarship, and assumptions, and conclusions, and what concerns the article of simon schuster, this is a public thing, i would even call it that, artistically public, and with this a whole series of admissions, errors and so on, if in this realm we want get accurate answers, and mr. antina, i recommend everyone to take the materials of tetyana nikolayenko's article, and you will receive exceptional answers, with documents, with names, on all the questions that simon writes. schuster, because his language is a language designed for a lower average, and a western reader, listener , that is, what is used in everyday life, as materials for persuading a neighbor, an acquai

before, well people just saw what's going on behind the scenes, i 'll tell you more, right now simon shusterfirmed that he did conduct these interviews with the current, with the current advisers about. i sincerely believe in this, listen, if a person walks around the office, talks to the president himself, why should he, why should other officials not talk to him? no, there was speculation that those who were not responsible for anything there were already there, well no we will name their names, but they are no longer in ukraine, but those who gave interviews, they are all in positions now, they are responsible for our foreign policy and our security, and they really doubt their success, this is a dangerous scenario, but the economist is a little leveled the situation... of ukrainians, but did not level the name, i will explain why? well, i have talked with maybe three or four people abroad, their perception, i myself, i am interested , it means that they perceive in general and that material is directed in one direction, that the situation has entered a certain moment, a new stage, and th

time, the initiator of these contacts was himself office of the president, because we see that simon shuster is a decorated journalist who was awarded the office, and there are not only anonymous people in this article, as you said, but also very well -known ukrainian society, surnames and gave comments, there are his quotes , and mr. shurma there, spent enough time with shuster, he quotes him there, well , absolutely wild positions, that it seems that the investigation against shurma was conducted there by sensitive parahabbots, and not ordered, and not by journalists, anti-corruptionists, all this looks, well really quite negative, but this is what connects the two articles and time and konmist, it seems to me that the ukrainian segment , at least there in the social network, has divided into two camps, some of them simply fell into a stupor, and is it really true, everything is about shvtan, that everything it is so difficult at the front, and what zaluzhny is talking about, these are people who were poisoned by the marathon, the only one, yes, and they sincerely believed in some kind of

week and even today. we have news, let's start from the very beginning, the very first article by simon shusteru know, i absolutely agree with ivanna klimpushansadze, who was with us on the air, that i would not have seen anything in these materials at all, that i would have been informed about something, that would i didn't know or i didn't understand. if people want to live in a world of their own reality, they live in it, early is the moment coming when people are forced to come to the world that is real , not cartoonish, as it happened to the ukrainians on february 24, last year, how much we talked about this real world, how people looked at us, like some just urban crazies, or putin will attack, this was a meme until february 24, 2022, or putin will attack, it won’t get any worse, well, by the way, it’s also a beautiful phrase that they say even now that it won’t get worse, it can get worse to be always, can only be better, yes so to speak worse always happens, and that's why i'm just, listen, the text of the shuster, for me it's just a snapshot from the president's office, well, there are

work in other directions, then we are also looking for, and we discussed the article before by simon shusterme edition, and there, in particular , bahmud is mentioned, that the enemy hangs over the road of life in bahmut under the red, is on the bridgehead west of the kordyumivka canal. please tell me, do you in the third assault have any reaction to this article and in particular to those sections for which you know not just from the media, well let's say this, the fact is that what he wrote about is not exactly our area of ​​responsibility, it is very close to our area of ​​responsibility, but still not it, so it's difficult for me, you know, to comment for this, for other units, yes, which are there, but well, i would like to emphasize that in general, the situation is now under control once, twice, no, despite the fact that the enemy is constantly acting, after all, we dictate the rules of the game , well, we are in the sense, the direction, not all of these brigades of mine as a whole. and thirdly, now due to the first, second and second factors, we have the initiative, so i don't think

the ukrainians are also criticized by the tyym magazine, which was published in an article by simon shusternd many other experts abroad, they say that you are not fighting like that, your counteroffensive is not like that, you were not calculated, you were not planned, but here you are looking from the other side, northern korea provided russia with a million shells, and it's not so that not so long ago there was a meeting between shaigu and kimchen, that is, well we went once and agreed, and the countries of the european union say that we cannot reach production indicators of such a capacity that we could make a million shells for on these capacities, when should we wait for this promised, contracted million projectiles for the armed forces, please, well, when we talk about the supply of ammunition from north korea to the russian federation, indeed, bloomberg reported that the supply of about one million took place of ammunition, enough for two months of fighting, that means 500... for one month, while europe now has production capacity for the whole year, the maximum is also 5,000 for the

olezh, after such serious and resonant articles, which in particular were in time, from simon shusterexample, our chief commissar of the zsu in the economist, fresh sociology, do you feel that the time has come when we will see political and other conclusions and changes in the state will come, well, i definitely and categorically against the holding of elections, because i believe that they will divide the country, and this is unacceptable, we need to unite around the armed forces of ukraine, regarding the interview. meritorious and these quotes from the office of the president, which were published by a person who a year ago the office of the president presented state awards, then i i believe that we simply heard the truth from the chief commissar, what the president's office is afraid to say, and we must unite, because this is our war, this must be our victory and this is our country, which we are defending, mr. oleg, thank you for participation in our program, people's deputy of ukraine, head of the subcommittee on ensuring the activities of people's deputies. well, it's time to c

leadership, according to your feelings, that's all that happened during the week. starting with simon shuster's article in time and then continuing with those posts by valery zaluzhny and then already there the resignation of the general who learned from the press about the fact that he is being fired, then here are these comments of igor zholkva , what do you think this is, well, i would probably not use the word split, we can talk about a certain tension that exists between... political and the military leadership, it finds its reflection in the actions of people who are not, in principle, political figures, but simply work in the office of the president, although this tension, it was felt even earlier in relation to some other vision of those processes that take place, for example, at the front, or how these processes are talked about there in individual mass media, or what information is available directly. from the president, well, on the one hand, it may be good that we learned about these certain disagreements, of course , this is it, well, in what way, it may be good, well , both, well,

igor, it is clear that zelenskyy is giving an interview there, to simon shuster, which is part of it,this large text that was published in the influential american publication time, but well, obviously, ukrainian tv viewers, ukrainian voters and, in general, everyone those who now live in ukraine, they feel betrayed, because there is a single national telethon that tells one thing and shows a completely different picture, and on the other on one side is the american edition of time, which says, listen, well, in general, he feels betrayed, almost betrayed, zelensky, and in general it is a disaster, because no one is reacting now the way they reacted a year ago, when he was in the united states of america, to him there they didn't give a word in the congress, and that is also a big problem, isn't it time for zelski to talk seriously with the people, with the people, and first of all with the political leaders, because we don't see this dialogue, there is a m... parliament, there are leaders of political parties who were elected before of the verkhovna rada, to whom the people entrusted

position themselves as pro-western and liberal and young and cool, and they attack, for example, this simon shusteri understand that these people may not have as much pro-western views as they think, because uh, interpret the article , which we like as beautiful, and the one that offends us as bad, this is actually, well , at least a sign of immaturity, and at most it simply means such a eurosceptic approach, let's say this, that is, skepticism about what is possible in principle, the existence of real, independent journalism is possible of journalism, i think that the espresso tv channel, the team that works here, which has a certain tenacity, by the way, we must say from the tvi tv channel, for example, many worked from kolek, somewhere there on the fifth channel, in a different revolution, in different times, in different, in different situations , there are always people who find themselves on one side of the barricades, and it is always the side of the barricades where, you know, less money is paid, where there are fewer opportunities for career growth, i think that this is also a certain sele

president you, you no, you will not have such an opportunity to communicate with the president, simon shustere such a chance, by the way, this is another problem when the president and the top leadership of the state are ready to communicate with western journalists, but not ready with their own, this is absolutely amazing thing, but there are some extremely important things for the country through the western media , that is, it is absolutely unacceptable, and when i, well , last year, one of the first and best, brightest publications, for example, about the liberation of kyiv oblast, is this or that washington post, or the new york times, and because our military, our top political leadership is there, they tell ukrainian journalists, they don't tell, but ukrainian non-journalists who serve the president's office, of course, that they leak only the information they believe . for what is needed, so, well, again, this leads to the fact that even in ukraine society does not understand what is being done, and this gives rise to some sometimes completely unjustified expectations, some fantasies,

these were the subjective opinions of those journalists with whom we worked there, they also meant simon shuster, we will now work differently, and you know, to me, as a person , which is very interested in clans, corporations, media people, how they work , who they are friends with, became very interested in why in recent weeks representatives of the bank began to appear not anywhere, namely on the media resources of the very famous, global media magnate rupert meridock. for example, andriy when yermak went to the united states of america, he went to give an interview to fox news. just a few days ago, the eldest son of rupert murdoch, who serves as the technical director, arrived and they met with zelskyi and brought them there, a number of journalists and even, well, zelenskyi didn’t learn anything, they also gave another journalist from rupert murdoch’s corporation an order for the possibility of a third degree, so they're obviously trying to buy loyalty, but it turns out it's still a bit moronic, like they say that because this edition of san, it also belongs to rupert murdoch's media corpor

the week and even today we have news, start from the very beginning , the very first article by simon shuster, i absolutely agree with ivanna klimpussadze, who was on our air, that i am in these in the materials i would not have seen something that i was informed about something that i did not know or understand, if people want to live in a world of their own reality, they live in it, sooner or later the moment comes when people are forced to come to that world, which is really non-multiplicative, as it happened with the ukrainians on february 24 last year, how much have we talked about this real one. the world, how people looked at us, as if they were just some urban lunatics, or putin would attack, that was a meme until february 24, 2022, and then putin will attack, it won't get worse, well, by the way, this is also a beautiful phrase , which even now, they say that it won't get worse, it can always be worse, it can only be better, so to speak, and worse always happens, and that's why i'm just, listen, shuster's text for me is just a snapshot from the president's office, there are photos, b

[000:00:00;00] simon shuster stated that there will be no temporary truce, and ukraine will never agree to it, quoting the president of ukraine, for us it would mean leaving this wound open for future generations, maybe it will calm some people inside our country and outside, at least those , who wants to finish the case at any cost, but for me this is a problem, because we remain with this explosive force, we are only delaying it, the detonation, said volodymyr zelenskyy, how do you, mr. valentin, see the negotiating, negotiating process, or some negotiations between ukraine and russia, which sooner or later will take place, this is a war, will still be finalized by some negotiations or, some, some round table, maybe not with the participation of zelskyi and putin, but at least with the participation of two round tables, at one will sit... putin will sign the capitulation, zelensky will sit behind the other. but, as you can see, there is further progress in the negotiation process, because the west also says that sooner or later we will still have to talk about some kind of peace, even

chechen republic within russia, or there, but before that i wanted to ask you your opinion about simon shuster's article in time magazine about president zelsky and the state of affairs in ukraine, this journalist is called pro-russian, they say that he had some certain scandals in the past, i will not use this word, it is incorrect, this word is absolutely literary, not journalistic, let it be, well, sure, questions arose for him regarding his previous works and there on azov and so on, but if it is not taken into attention, how would you decipher for the ukrainian reader and viewer this article in time magazine , about president zelensky, about whether the state of affairs in ukraine is modern, please, what did you want to say and who was it for, for whom was this message in general? well, you know, i am very careful , mr. vasyl, about various things. which people write, as you rightly emphasized with certain slurs, although maybe this is the wrong word, but, but it, it still has the right to exist, because what he usually writes, it for some reason somehow strangely resonates mainly with , we

about in the american congress, yes we understand that there was an unpleasant publication by simon shuster and so on, well, but as far as we understand, in the american congress they are not dealing with publications like shuster's writings, they are dealing with these or other documents and, accordingly, is there any communication with the american in particular, by law enforcement agencies in that case, which raises a lot of questions, not only within the borders of our state, but excuse me, how should i comment, as a member of the anti-corruption council, or as a citizen of ukraine, as a member of the anti-corruption council, well, maybe i don’t know, there representatives of various american, i don't know, parliamentary committees are contacting you to explain certain things, you know, i would like to receive an answer to many questions that i myself have seen within the walls of the ministry of defense, all the documents that we saw and which caused us, well, there are some serious concerns, they were once again transferred to the law enforcement agencies, do i have any questions pers

democrats would rather put forward the possible. specifically his, and accordingly, an article by simon shusterared, you see, well, it was done by the shusters in ukraine, well, but in any case, a person who had some kind of access to some offices, yes, and the article is quite unpleasant , although it is quite symptomatic, because it caused a colossal resonance in various serious political circles, that is, the article is more serious than a throw , for example, general svr about dead putin in the refrigerator. well, frankly, let’s say that such an article could have appeared an hour ago , well, like that, or a year and a half ago, well, during the war, it seems to me, no, it seems to me, no, somehow in general and ethically , politically, it would be inappropriate more than that, it would be ostracized as a journalist , to say the least, it is put so mildly, they would see the order in this, they would see the interests of the kremlin, and now , after some time, no one accuses him of what it is he had such a commitment that he went, somehow he found out everything, he gave such material, like

democrats would rather nominate him, perhaps specifically, and accordingly the article appeared simon shuster, it was already done by the shusters in ukraine, well, but in any case, a person who had certain access to some offices there, yes, this one is quite unpleasant, although it is quite symptomatic, because it caused colossal resonance in various serious political circles, i.e. the article is more serious than a throw-in, for example, of the general of the svr about the dead putin in the refrigerator, well , directly, let’s say, such an article could have appeared an hour ago, well, like that, or a year and a half ago, well, here during the war, i don't think so, i don't think so, somehow in general and ethically and... they would be subjected to journalistic ostracism, at the very least, that 's how it's put so mildly, then they'd see the order, they'd see the interests the kremlin, but now ... after a while, no one blames him in the fact that this is some kind of commitment he has, that here he went, well, somehow he found out everything, he gave such material, like an interview, and z

the democrats would rather put forward , maybe specifically his, and accordingly, an article by simon shusterne by the shusters in ukraine , well, but in any case, a person who had certain access to some offices there, and the article is quite unpleasant, although it is quite symptomatic, because it caused a colossal resonance in various serious political circles, that is, the article is more serious than a throw-in, for example, of the general of the sv, it seems, no, still somehow in general and these, well, at the time of the war, it seems to me, no, to me and politically, it would be inappropriate, more so than, they would be subjected to journalistic ostracism, at least, to put it mildly, they would see an order in this, they would see the interests of the kremlin, for now no one accuses him of the fact that this is some kind of commitment he has, that here he went, well, how - that's all he found out, he gave such material, like an interview, and zelsky accepted it and so on, he wrote that, yes, you know, it certainly does not depend on the fact that in my opinion the article is bad, in

the democrats would rather nominate him, perhaps specifically him, and accordingly an article by simon shusterhe shusters in ukraine, well, but in any case, a person who had there is some kind of access to some offices, and the article is quite unpleasant, although it is quite symptomatic, because it caused a colossal resonance in various serious political circles, that is , the article is more serious than a throw-in, for example, svr about the dead putin in the refrigerator, well, let’s be frank , such an article could have appeared an hour ago, well, a year and a half ago , well, during the war, it seems to me, no, it seems to me, no, somehow, in general , both ethically and politically, it was it would be inappropriate more than that, they would be subject to a blusher journalistic ostracism, to say the least, it is expressed so mildly, they would have seen the order in this, they would have seen the interests of the kremlin, and now , after some time, no one accuses him of the fact that this is some kind of commitment he has, that here he went, well, somehow he figured it all out, he gave

of the author zelensky, as well as for interviews with people from his entourage, we turned to simon shusterm the certainty of these statements, according to him, he is currently on the plane, we are waiting for his answer, and in the meantime we will discuss with our mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of the european solidarity faction joins the conversation, mr. mykola, good evening, glory to ukraine, heroes, glory, i congratulate you, mr. mykola, i read your post on facebook, regarding the reaction to this article, and from what i understood , this article is not okay for us, and maybe have consequences, maybe you can correct me now as to how i interpreted your words and explain to us what these consequences might be? well, the main thing is that it was usually written for a western reader, but it would have been translated and quoted by the ukrainian mass media, as it usually happens, publications in the west have an impact on public sentiment within the country itself. so there is a negative impact on what is happening inside the country, because this article causes despair, and despa

democrats would rather nominate him, perhaps specifically him, and accordingly, an article by simon shusters in ukraine, well, but in any case, a person who had some kind of access to some ...' and the article quite unpleasant, although it is quite symptomatic, because it caused a tremendous resonance in various serious political circles, i.e. the article is more serious than the introduction, for example, of the svr general about the dead putin in the refrigerator, well, frankly, such an article could have appeared an hour ago, well, a year and a half ago or so, well, during the war, it seems to me, no, it seems to me, no, still somehow in general, ostracism, at least, they are expressed so softly, here we would see the order, see would interests of the kremlin, but now after some time, no one accuses him of the fact that this is some kind of commitment he has, that he went, well, somehow he found out everything , he gave such material, like an interview, and zelensky accepted him and so on, here he is wrote such a thing, yes, you know, it is definitely... regardless of the fact that in my

that yes, this simon shuster is 15 years old... the wrong smartster will probably still demandd immediately, okay, but let’s assume that everything is not so, that everything is fine with zelensky, and here, out of spite, the zaluzhny comes out, firstly , the very fact that he is high-ranking. the word spoken by this kind of people is always analyzed, considered, and what is said there, well, firstly, it is offensive to the west, because it is said that the doctrine that was written was read by foreigners, and was based on their idea of ​​​​the art of war, it is absolutely vicious that they can carefully fold all the textbooks and throw them in the trash, kornilov, a great forty -five soviet general, smirny, who analyzes the experience of the first world war, and vladimir vladimirovich, very witty, i advise him also pay attention to winter companies, because the same author also has dedicated experience in studying finnish companies, apparently, but we also see the fact that everything, our every step is visible. no he he says, i talked to people from google , everything is gre

it is noteworthy that the material was written by journalist simon shuster, also a fan of trips to kiever who was the author of an article in april of twenty-two, which painted the image of zelsky as the savior of the world from russia. ya got the wisdom that i never wanted to, said the president of ukraine. the comedian president was so inspired by working with the american correspondent that last year he awarded shustor the order of merit , third class. but now the new love of the west and the usa, israel and kiev makes it very awkward. as they say, from a wise man to an empty place is one year, this is what shustor wrote now. vladimirsky is deceiving himself and does not see that kiev is losing. conflict, the ukrainian president's belief in victory worries some of his advisers and borders on with messianism. some of zelsky's advisers say his stubbornness is hampering his team's efforts to develop a new strategy, a new message. while they argue about further options for the development of the conflict, one topic remains taboo, the topic of negotiations to conclude a peace agreement wi