time, there was a repackaging and slightly altering argument that had been debated in the public's speer for a long time, and i confess that's just, again, beginning to be something we have happen more and more in the brief, and the legal briefs filed in the case, and, you know, justice scalia only reads the brief. [laughter] scoffs at blogs out there. [laughter] you can imagine others say, well, you know, if i wanted to know the extended version of the argument, i don't want to have the page limit version or interested in a specific issue, look, there's a series on this issue. go to that if you want to know more. i don't know if we'll have the official blog post for a particular case or, like, the doj blog where they get it offer theirs or have their own version. i wonder if they play the broader role. in my mind, ultimately, that's a good thing because if you don't want to access it, you don't have to, of course, the briefs will be there. the affordable care act case, i think, probably is the example now of bleeping of roles, and it leads to the briefs being one of many parts of the pu