it's the united states versus the autocracies, united states versus russia, and china. and the purpose of the summit is to create, trying to create a star contrast between those to the idealized vision america versus the overly propagandized pitcher that we've painted about the you know, the evil nature of a russian and chinese rule. it's, it's purely a propaganda ploy. yeah, i don't think i'm 60. yeah, let me got alexa here in moscow, i guess, you know, it's a, it's a crating, some kind of global alliance against russia against china. i guess also hungry hungry didn't get invited. ok. and you know, at the same time, ukraine is there, i suppose it's there because of the u. s. was behind a coup that over through the democratically elected government in february of 2014, so conveniently, they made it out on board here. alex a, this is just a farce. this is a propaganda effort here. and it countries have interests. they don't necessarily have values, values and interests coincide. that's great. but values are do not ra rule. they never have and they never will on in, in in

people want to commit terrorist acts the united states is much easier pieces to get to come to the united states. we look at this we find no relationship between immigration in the united states or elsewhere. really being in a conflict is what drives terrorists. >> 1986 there was it immigration amnesty. is that do again and your view? >> listen we've got more than 10 million people residing illegally in the united states. whether it's president trump who is as anti- immigration or obama before him they are not all being deported it would rip society apart to try to do that. they are here. i don't see how we benefit from having them here illegally when he could be here legally. let's bring them above the board, get them on the books and make it official. i also think you have to couple that with the increase path to legal migration. if you don't, just like before you'll have the reset button people will come here illegally. it is to allow for greater legal immigration but. >> because wretched refuse? the political institutions, co-authored by texas but first it's a discussion on covid-19 a

s. government life for the united states does. it is important to deal with the united states in a sense, constrain the worst aspect of us behavior by international agreements like the jcp away. so as long as it is, i think it is important to try to get back to either the g p, a or something that at least tries to buy bound not just united states, but all parties to some semblance of international standards and international law . hummer, is it as easy? is the window of opportunity closing? is there a time limit on these talks or can i just continue ad nauseum? of course there is no official or kind of formal time limits, but given that size, i mean, it seems that both sides are continuing to increase their level or is there can be a point when you know the talks would be kind of meaningless because i'm the one hand each round of negotiations and failing to kind of persuade united states to lift the sanctions. iran continues with its nuclear activity development, so it's not good. i think it is the same time. we have more tensions

american people to welcome and support all those who are seeking safety and refuge here in the united states beginning with our afghan allies. we work very closely with local and national resettlement agencies, federal states and local governments with hundreds of nonprofits, the private sector, and many across the american public who are raising their hands to make contributions and welcome our newest afghan neighbors and we help coordinate and direct those resources and those assets to where it is needed most. host: how many refugees are in the process of being resettled from afghanistan for -- after the pullout? guest: there were 100,000 afghans at risk who were evacuated as part of the evacuation of the u.s. from afghanistan and 70,000 of those have now arrived here in the united states. eight military bases across the united states, they received their final paperwork and processing and covid vaccinations and initial orientation and now close to a little over 40,000 of those initial 70,000 have made their way across the united states to new communities where they will be rebuilding thei

>> oh well, think we discussed very generally the going on of the of the united states and the division within the congress is now between conservativess. and liberals. and the lack of cooperation. he was a person who could work across the state partisan lines. he was the sort of a person that knew you had to have republicans and democrats if you're going to get anything done. people who were for the bill in some way both had to have some victories. and that is what made him a l successful leader of the united states senate for the 11 or 12 years part of that is majority leader. what g advice did he give you as your mentor? >> 's advice was a funny thing on the united states senate if got to do it in a bipartisan way agricultural issues i think the advice was there's a lot of different interests between midwest agriculture work he and i come from in southern agriculture in california agriculture. some ways on agriculture issues all those interest in the united states have to be settled we can'' expect because you're from iowa you're going to get everything corn and soybean people want a

he sued the united states and then they let him go back. do you think jewel in a sancha will be able to get any sort of leeway when he tried doing the united kingdom where the united states for failing to enforce the conditions of his tradition yet tomorrow morning. they can take us on throw him into atx, florence, or refuse to let him go to australia and then he can't contest anything because there is no piece of paper with a song just signature on it, like there was with mendoza the you want the united states will tell him the same thing. they said to mendoza, they will say you are not a signatory of the extradition treaty between the us and u. k. you have no claim goodbye. and then his only pap saunders only path will be to go to the united kingdom to get the u. k. to pressure the us to follow the assurances to abide by the assurances. do you really think the country that is kept truly massage? jail for effect will be 10 years arbitrary detention is going to fight for him is going to pressure the us. i mean, you know, not in your wildest

the united states does not likely invoke an authority like this to sue a state. the reason we done it here is because sb-8 is so unpredented, extraordinary, and extraordinarily dangerous for our constitutional structure. if texas is correct, that it can nullify this court's precedents and successfully evade the mechanisms this court recognized in ex parte young and congress recognized in section 1983, then no constitutional right is safe. we think that, in this extraordinary circumstance, the united states has a sovereign interest in intervening to protect the supremacy of federal law. >> what if our precedent on something in a different area of law all together was just uncertain? there was an open question about something. a state wanted to kind of cabin and draw a line with respect to the precedent. would the u.s. have the authority there? is there something about what you think is the clarity of the violation here that triggers your authority? >> if the state structured that hypothetical law in this same way, we'd have the same concern, that the state is effe

they agreed to create a working group with the united states, with experts from china, from the unitedrt of this group, who will help formulate the policy to achieve the reductions that china needs to achieve. and china will be, obviously, held accountable to that process. number two — china agreed, next year, to produce a new plan, "an ambitious national action plan to reduce methane "and deal with methane in china." number three — for the first time, china did not stick with its...with its peaking in its coal emissions by 2030. they said they will begin to phase down the consumption of coal by 2026 and, in very hard—fought—over words, they agreed that they will accelerate the effort and try and do it sooner than that. so, by working with the united states and others... well, it's interesting. you focus on the word... but you have to begin somewhere. no, of course you do. none of this is easy. i do get that. but diplomacy works in complex ways. sure. now, here's something that the chinese foreign minister said, actually, i believe, in reference to you and your work. he said, "the us s

the united states is refusing to recognize any of these countries and the job. i didn't, jo, my name isn't in charge really, a point i want to make this is the continuation of the us state department and of course their foreign policy. this is really nothing to do with democracy. it's more of an, it's more of the tricks and by the way, the united states government, the united states military, is very rich in talking about democracy when they're jailing journalists like julian assigned. and i mean, it's just, it's just delirious for them to talk about a summit on democracy when in reality the united states is the number one persecutor of journalists and any sort of descent. and they're basically trying to frame this as an attempt to really create more animosity towards china and russia. yeah, in a, i'd like to also point out about the $500.00 plus people's languishing in jail in the greater washington d. c. area because of january 6. okay, scott, i mean the, the way i look at it here, this is, it's very reductionist in their thinking. and here, this is how it work

the tide has turned against the united states.ot saying that they are on the verge of collapse. what i'm saying is that things are increasingly difficult for the united states. if the united states wants to cut costs in this region, the only sane thing to do is to implement the nuclear deal. all iran wants is the full implementation of the nuclear deal with verification. anchor: we will have to leave it there for time. thank you to all of our guests. thank you for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website. for further discussion, go to our facebook page. you can also join the conversation on twitter. for the whole team here in doha, goodbye for now. ♪ >>9÷y=÷,>,ñ ♪ ♪ >> just walking in this garden of the hill and down the hill, you don't need to go to a gym. come to the garden. >>

he never lived in the united states. he doesn't, over the united states, and thing is not a us citizen. so he's an australian citizen in the u. k. just publishing classified documents that show gross government misconduct, suppose crimes against humanity and the going after him because it's political because he embarrassed them. he embarrassed the c, i a the state department and so on. so the entire indictment is certainly political . now, on the other hand, even though it's on just case is, is very unique. i would argue that at the same time, this treatment that he's being given by the department of justice needs assurances . this is actually standard thing. they regularly trick other jurisdictions, other countries into sending people to the u. s. into extra dining them. and once they're in us or fiction game over who's going to force us to comply with an agreement that it may, no one can really do that, not even the u. k. so in a sense, it is absolutely political, being government, political the, which one to is. but i

months, the entirety of all the chinese miners left china set up in cars, extend setup, and in the united states and texas. so as the i states is now the largest producer of bickley, they're the biggest mining operations there. so i mean, we do kind of follow that and think that's a truth that this is a kind of a lethargy setting in because of the end of a system. yeah, absolutely. so for 2 points on the 1st point, the, when we talk about the money printing has created massive misplaced signals throughout the entire american economy. since $971.00, we are a paper empire, the paper aristocracy gets all that free money. it doesn't pay to set up a manufacturing plant. that's a real capex, right? they don't want to sell you a car. they want to lease you occur. they don't want to sell you furniture. they want to lease you furniture. everything is become financial like the private equity that take 0 percent money, free money there. first thing is a cut all the jobs, close the factories and outsource it. busy ok, our whole system is set up not to make anything here because it damages or financials beca

when a state attempts to thwart judicial review, the united states may sue an equity to address that harm. >> so they would have an injunction against the attorney general and the private plaintiffs acting as state actors, say we didn't want to enjoin the clerks and the entire apparatus of the state, say we thought and you're asking for the same injunction, nay are bringing this kind of in depth suit. >> it is hating what is appropriate. i think if we file that suit, and at that point there was no relief on the ground in texas. this law took effect and tilled the about what was coming out. i think it is a separate one and it could be the case that there is not a need for remedies in both of these cases, but that is a separate question from whether or not we can sue in the first place. >> thank you, general stone? welcome back. >> it's been a long time. >> thank you, again, mr. chief justice. may it please the court. the department of justice's suit offends the separation of powers by working for the executive branch the role that congress plays in the cases that may be heard and the r

in 2003, a credible military threat by the united states stop iran's program for a year. then you have the example of 2012, where prime minister netanyahu went to the united nations and drew his famous redline, and that bomb that he drew a redline on. that redline was that iran, if it moved to enriching a bomb's worth of uranium, 3.5 percent, 20 percent, and a 90% is the fissile material. 3.5% they had already done a bomb. they were moving into a bomb's worth of 20% enriched uranium. the feeling that israel had at the time was once they do the 20% and complete 20% enriched uranium, the difference between there and the breakup time to getting fissile material is so sharp -- short and may be detectable that israel cannot stop it, so we have to to put the redline there. what did iran do when faced with that redline? they didn't dismantle their nuclear program but they did not cross the line. they were going vertically up the line and then for a few weeks, just to save face, and then they started stockpiling many bombs worth of low enriched uranium. in a certain sense, they we

the united states violates its assurances. it's diplomatic agreements, whether it's iran, nuclear deal, whether it's, you know, a prison transfer assurances for a saundra window that they're going to violate the mark my words. this is going to happen. mendoza certain of this, and i interviewed him for this and he seen dozens of people from spain, from columbia, from mexico, from all over the world who've been given assurances. and once they get to the us, it's violated these documents that i published. they weren't seen by the court yet . they weren't submitted in court. and i'm convinced that if the judge had seen them, if the judge's study of these documents, they could not let this extra sure go ahead because they've accepted that a song just suicidal. they've accepted the judge, applied the test correctly, that he would be even more suicidal. he would, he would drive an extradition to deal with, would drive him to take what makes up that all this. so the only reason they allow the appeal to go ahead today was that the judg

debate on the nomination of calendar number 442, bathsheba crocker, to be representative of the united states of america to the office of the united nations and other international organizations in geneva signed by 17 senators as follows. schumer i ask unanimous consent that the reading of the names be waived. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. schumer: i move to proceed to legislative session. the presiding officer: the question is on the motion to proceed. all those in favor say aye. all opposed, say no. the ayes appear to have it. the ayes do have it. the motion is agreed to. mr. schumer: move to proceed to executive session to consider calendar number 454. the presiding officer: the question is on the motion to proceed. all in favor say aye. all opposed, say no. the ayes appear to have it. the ayes do have it it. the motion is agreed to. the clerk will report the nomination. the clerk: nomination, department of state, marc git -- the clerk: cloture motion, we, the undersigned senators, in accordance with the provisions of rule 22 of the standing rules of the senate, do hereby b

he told president putin directly that if russia further invades ukraine, the united states and our european allies would respond with strong economic measures. we would provide defensive materiel to the ukrainians above and beyond which we are already providing and fortify our nato allies on the eastern flank with additional capabilities with response to such an escalation. he also told president putin there is another option, de-escalation and diplomacy. the united states and our european allies would engage in a discussion that covers larger strategic issues, including our strategic concerns with russia and russia's strategic concerns. we managed to do this at the height of the cold war and we developed mechanisms to help produce instability and increased transparency. we did it in the post-cold war era through the osce and other mechanisms. there's no reason we can't do that forward -- going forward, provided that we are operating in a context of de-escalation rather than escalation. the united states, as we have been for some time, is also prepared to support efforts to response the min

the time has turned against the united states. i'm not saying that the united states now is on the verge of collapse, but i'm, what i am saying is that things are increasingly difficult for the united states. and if the united states wants to cut costs in this region with all the problems that it's facing, the only same thing to do is to implement the nuclear deal. and all you ron wants is the full implementation of the nuclear deal with verification. all right, thank you very much. we will have to leave it there for time. thank you to all of i guess mama bronte, hillary man, leverett, and there is a as easy and thank you to for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website, just a dot com and for fun, the discussion go to our facebook page at facebook dot com forward slash ha inside story. can also join the conversation on twitter. handle is as a inside story for me, kim vanelle and whole team here in dough half the bye for now. on counting, the cost on a drawn puts oil in stock markets into a spin on t

you describe the united states as a warehouse economy. if the u. k was a national shopkeepers during the last days, the empire, we are now a warehouse economy. as you have stated, this kind of our characteristic now, chip manufacturers, the u. s, spent tens of billions on share buybacks are now getting handed tens of billions from a taxpayer to build foundries and the u. s. as that going to go well in china, they're kind of making fun of us because we are, we do have some boundaries on, in production, in arizona. they're building them up and they're kind of share pictures now on the internet. look at this plants a years later, are these things happen? so in china they build it in 6 months, but over here it takes a year. we just have the foundation, doug. so that's kind of going around on in twitter now, especially amongst the chinese wolf or your diplomats or kind of laugh and like, and we forced to chip makers come here. it's a good idea. we have to produce something here locally. otherwise, we're always going to be at the mercy of china for chips.

now that this has been somewhat denied by the united states. where does the campaign go now and what ground does the u. k. i have to see with this on to stories going anywhere up to the grounds that have been tested mean that the medical condition has not been overturned by the u. s. all that has been overturned. is this idea of diplomatic assurances and we know from recent information provided both in the u. k. adam saying that the u. s. is diplomatic assurances are not work. the paper they're written on. there are several instances of people who were given assurances and who would then, you know, in the us treated up to a very different kind of the other thing they've, the judges have taken a decision on is the fact that he will not be detained on the sounds but sounds enough or session addresses and measures are not the only extreme isolation measures that the u. s. does they use various names for? they said it would be quite a mockery of justice. if we fail, we won't use sound good, we'll use something else and that's what the u. s. is doin

we're reducing in the united states. madam chair, as the united states has led the world in reducing emissions, the global community has increased 10-fold for every time we've reduced. let me say that again, you can look at the strategies, and europe is a great example. california's a great example for us. we can either follow strategies that work, or continue to do what you all are trying to do right now, manipulating technologies, taking options away from innovators and at the end of the day, resulting in higher emissions, higher prices, it's a flawed approach and we have the evidence to prove it. it's irresponsible for us to continue in this direction. yield back. >> with that objection, members who wish to open statements into the record have five business days to do so. i'd like to welcome our witnesses, we hear from experts on the challenges and opportunities for international climate action as world leaders prepare to gather in glasgow for c.o.p. 26, first tarin francin, senior fellow at global research institute

now in the dodd case, whiches united states supreme court is about to hear, the united states supreme court has a really rare opportunity to say, as justice scalia wrote in one of his opinions, that value judgments made on behalf of people should be voted on by those people and not dictated from washington d.c. in the dodd case, the united states supreme court, mr. president, has the rare opportunity to say what we all know and that is that america is this big, wide open diverse, sometimes messy, sometimes dysfunctional, sometimes imperfect, but always trying to get better group of good people. that's what america is. and we don't always agree. especially not on value judgments. especially not on the ultimate value judgment. like when it is appropriate to take a human life. that's why we get to vote. that's why we get to vote. and that's why we have elected representatives who often times vote on our behalf. the elected representatives who also can be unelected if we don't like how they vote. and finally, mr. president, in dodd, the united states supreme court has the rare opportunity

the goal of president biden's meeting today with vladimir putin was to make very clear that the united states does not except either that goal of russia making ukraine less than anything that it should be, which is a sovereign and independent state or the means by which vladimir putin is trying to achieve them, that is militarily. we are willing to talk about european security. he made clear we will do that together with all of our allies. we should have a conversation about that. by the way, as jake sullivan underscored, that's not something new. in 1974, we had a conference on security and cooperation in europe that led to the helsinki final act. we've had these kinds of discussions during the cold war, after the cold war. it's perfectly fine to do it in the future but we're not going to do it with 100,000 troops ready to invade on the borders of ukraine, and that's the message i think that president biden was trying to send to president putin and to do so, with the full support of our allies in europe. >> we'll see if that message is received. jill dougherty, phil mattingly, matthew chance

guest: i think we discussed just very generally the goings-on in the congress of the united states and probably the division within the congress now between conservatives and liberals. and the lack of cooperation because that meant a lot to bob dole. he was a person that could work across state -- partisan lines. he's the sort of person that knew that you had to have republicans and democrats if you were going to get anything done. he knew that both people who were against and for the bill some way both of them had to have some victories. that's what made him a successful leader of the united states senate for the 11 or 12 years he was a republican leader and part of that he was a majority leader. host: what advice did he give you as your mentor? guest: i think the advice was that if you are going to get anything done in the united states senate, you've got to do it in a bipartisan way. on agricultural issues i think the advice was that there's a lot of different interests between midwestern agriculture where we come from an southern agriculture and california agriculture, and some wav

information, the history of the united states. and if found guilty and convicted, he could be sent to prison for up to a 175 years. that's because the us have indicted him on 18 counts under the espionage act for publishing. i classified military documents over like the war in iraq and afghanistan, but most crucially, when i got included claims a minute to even killed thousands of innocent civilians. now, speaking outside the high court here this morning, we've heard from stella morris the partner who is incredibly disappointed and she is saying why and how is this happening? how long can this really go on for? and many people have been supporting her outside here. many, many protests is that also of similar questions there who is a glimmer of hope that you know, the british justice system might actually prevail for once. the british judiciary, as assistive on every level the u. s. campaign to get i 10 years, 10 years in the streets of london, public opinion in business side, a sound. but obviously the judge's decision. 9 is not o

of the united states, afghanistan in parallel. both of them feed into each other in ways that are more complicated. the second one is an interesting example. the ak-47 is invented in 1947, soviet weapon, one of the iconic symbols of the cold war, a symbol of the post 9/11 era, photographs of osama bin laden with the ak-47. what is interesting on the flag of four countries, mozambique, zimbabwe, just think about that. the mozambique one is interesting, there's an awesome bob dylan song called mozambique and it is meant to be ironic because mozambique was torn apart and the final one that is not discussed often is all of this takes place against the backdrop of decolonization. at the end of world war ii, you've got a lot of countries, but nowhere near the amount of countries that eventually become independent with the cold war. the best cold war, to decolonization and think about all of the european powers after world war ii, probably beaten up. almost the whole of the beginning of the cold war is under european, some form of europe

today i wish to focus on the state department's efforts to protect the united states, our citizens, our allies and our interests from terrorists. the state department is taking concrete and specific actions to counter complex and evolving terrorist threats worldwide we play a critical role in the efforts to strengthen partnerships and build civilian capacity to counter the full spectrum of terrorist threats confronting the united states and our allies. this includes bolstering the professional. i and capability of partner nations, law enforcement to identify, deter, prevent, disrupt, an rehend, investigate, prosecute and convict terrorists and their supporters including thru support for key regional and multilateral institutions and global initiatives. the state department is leading the u.s. government's diplomatic engagements with key partners to ensure broad international counterterrorism support and assistance. state engages with foreign partners and leverages multilateral organizations such as the global organization to defeat isis. state in coordinate with interagency and internat

but the united states held him in a u. s. jail for almost 7 years before. eventually returning him. annie, after he took legal action against america, we spoke to independent journalist richard met hurst to release the documents in the case. you know, they've told us on that he can serve at any potential sentence in his home country australia. they said the exact same thing to mendoza. they told him just just let him come to the us and he can serve any sentence given back in spain. in mendoza's case, the united states signed a contract, an explicit contract with mendoza, and with spain saying that he must be returned to spain. he cannot be given a life sentence, he kind of tried for conscience structuring. they violated this, the u. s. kept him for 6 years and 9 months. the only reason mendoza was allowed to go back to spain is because he sued spain twice in the spanish supreme court. and he won and spain threatened to cut off the extradition treaty with the us. that is when the u. s. felt pressure, they wanted to keep ext

of world powers has changed. china, among other countries trying to fill the void left by the united states in modest on iraq and elsewhere. russian military contracts for our defense systems have attracted us allies, including fell on eto, members, turkey as well as some gulf states. but the recent us approach to foreign policy isn't a surprise antony blank and has this to say before becoming your secretary of state . in a, by the administration, we would see more emphasis on the in the pacific, more emphasis on our own hemisphere as well as some sustained engagement. i would hope with africa and obviously europe remains a partner. first resort, not last resort when it comes to contending where the challenges we face. just as a matter of time allocation and budget priorities, i think, where would be doing less, not more in the middle east. ah, let's bring it all gus in washington, dc. hillary. my leverett chief executive of the political risk consulting firms trust go. she's also former director for iraq. afghanistan, i'm persian gulf. a fan of the national security council is not born in

this is the 1st president history, united states, america. there's anybody seeking asylum, has to do it in another country that's never happened before in america. we want to end this program, but we also believe in following the law. and that's exactly what we're doing. as there was, there was a ruling that required us moving forward with the implementation sufficiently called the migrant protection protocols. though it's commonly referred to as the remain in mexico program. it was instituted by us present, donald trump, during his administration, requiring migrants who would like to get asylum in the united states to wait in mexico for their approval. they don't wait in the united states, they wait across the border in mexico. the biden administration initially tried to dismantle and change this policy that was left over from the trump administration, but they were immediately taken to court by officials in missouri and texas. now it appears we have a texas judge ruling that the remain in mexico policy must be re implemented. and as we wait

the united states isn't really worthless. here's our from interrupting, but that's categorically false. anything that's not gold, in this case with big coin by de, monetize in gold is not only is it a threat, but it's an extinction event. this will put an extension of an annuity dollar gemini, because it's a 100 percent pure monetary signal, whereas gold at most might be 80 or 90 percent monetary signal. this is a 100 percent, monica, this is, this is, this is kryptonite to america, superman. this is our vulnerability, dr. michael hudson. i mean, i think we're getting very close to we gotta take a, we gotta carry this over to park to. that's what we're going to do. but for now, thanks for being a kaiser report to be here. all right, that's going to do it for the as part of the kaiser par with re max kaiser and stacy herbert special guest, doctor michael hudson. he's out with the 3rd edition of the classic super imperialism. to hear ted till next time by yo ah ah ah. well, it's not it? no, no, no, no, no, no, but they did a ma

they don't wait in the united states, they wait across the border in mexico. the biden administration initially tried to dismantle and change this policy that was left over from the trump administration. but they were immediately taken to court by officials in missouri and texas. now it appears we have a texas judge ruling that the remain in mexico policy must be re implemented. and as we wait for the ultimate results of an august lawsuit, now there's been a very significant increase in the number of migrants crossing the u. s. borders since joe biden has taken office, a lot of videos and information has been revealed about how these numbers are rising. the number of people crossing over the us border has been a big point of contention. many of jo biden's critics in the republican party and in local and state government in places like texas, arizona, new mexico have been very critical of biden, and his administration and how they handled the situation on the border. so it appears that starting next week, some border towns in texas will be re implementing the r

the fund and largest contributor in the united states -- and the united states is looking forward to hosting the global fund's seventh replenishment conference next year here. thank you. [applause] can't kid ourselves, particularly about the disparities we see nestcally and globally, particularly the high transmission rates among adolescent girls and young women. as we look back over the last 40 years where there's been so much pain and suffering, it's a testament to the hard work of those in this room and around the world that we have gathered today with hope in our hearts for the future that's within our grasp. we can do this. we can do this. we can eliminate h.i.v. transmission. we can get the epidemic under control here in the united states and in countries around the world. we have the scientific understanding, we have treatments, and we have the tools we need. we're going to engage with people with lived experience of h.i.v. and ensure that our efforts are appropriate and effective and centered around the needs of the h.i.v. community, not us, but the needs of the community. fo

when the united states was the most powerful, important country in world history, when it races to thecipice, has an impact on others. other things are happening are bad enough, but with t united ates in the lead and margie to destruction, the future is very dim. it is our responsibility here to control it, terminate it, to turn the country back to sanity. don't even like to say "back" but turn it to sanity on these issues befe it is too late. nermeen: professor, of one of a severe threat from a resurgent proto-fascist right here in the u.s. and spoken -- you have spoken out againsthe general right-wing shift across theoliticalpectm in the u.s. if youan expla at you think is behind that and if y see any prospects in the near future for its reveal? >>ell, we have been through a 40 year, 45 year sault on the general population within the framework of what is called neoliberalism. it has had a very serious impact. there are even some measures of it through -- thrand corporation, super respectable, did a study recently of what they politely called transfer of wealth from the lower 90% of t

as he said, there will be an effort to equip allies but beyond that, the united states and the united states public really has little appetite for that . so kind of giving reassurance as well at the same time, be realistic is what the united states is offering, right? now, and what i can also tell you is that on the heels of military conflict in afghanistan and that withdrawal of the united states that went so badly for the u. s. there really is very little public support for the united states to send it soldiers to assist in resolving this. conflicts to the united states is very keen on seeing this moving forward, diplomatically, and that's the message that it is sending to its allies and ukraine in specifics. all right, thank you very much. white house correspondent, kimberly how kit following the story from washington, dc and charles stratford. joining us live not from harrison and southern ukraine. so is kimberly was saying that the u. s. has made it abundantly clear that they will not be deploying foreign troops to the region, but what kind of support does ukraine want to see fro