it is clear that the united states cannot win in a simultaneous confrontation. d china, and they are just consolidating the very eurasian monolith united, the resources of which, as henry kisonger wrote, obviously exceed resources of the united states and even the collective west dmitry thank you very much. we definitely say. i didn't screw up anything. i said that the united states could enter this dangerous road, but did not begin to enter. of course, they didn't go that far for her. uh, uh, hitler or napoleon for sure, and my hope is that this will not be done, and we also hope that there is still enough strategic in the united states. thinking dmitry thank you very much, my will definitely continue a very interesting conversation with you in next times. thank you so much great game will be back in the studio in a few moments. which burned in my heart, and i had to leave a woman in the film. and this is an example when you look and understand that it is really possible to remain just a woman of a figure at any age, it is not enough who will keep such a figure

was our government by the united states, not our country. so our country is still an independent state, but we are not in control of our independence were occupied. lm's, this book over throat is an attempt to show the times that america over through foreign governments over a long period in the united states, at least in a relative sense, is declining in power in the world. and we can still remain, and i believe will still remain a potent dominant force in the world. but we need to accept that the conditions of past decades don't exist anymore. and we're not used to this. we're not ready for this psychologically. americans have always been on top. we think of ourselves is always getting our way. and we're entering into a period when that's not going to be so easy. the challenge is, can we adapt our habit of dominance to a more equal multi polar warren edgar ah. ah, in with what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have. it's crazy confrontation, let it be an arms race group is on offense. very dramatic development. only personally

the desire of the united states to draw japan into finland, sweden is quite understandable. n’t offer anything positive, but they create problems for us and they really put together a block of states that can be called imperialist states, as we have already said here, a block of capitalist states will be absolutely incomplete if it does not coincide, er, with the hitlerite coalition. so, because we are talking about the fourth reich. and what is the fourth reich without finland, what is the fourth reich without norway what is the fourth reich without japan ? this is the force that opposed us then in great patriotic war. here it is taking shape, and therefore it is so important what we are doing in the international arena, creating, if you like, an anti- imperialist coalition or a coalition from trans- free from american global domination, hence what we are doing in mariupol is so important in ukraine because the only way to resist this evil is to stop it and what we are doing is what our heroic armed forces are doing.

they contain the united states. consequences associated with the likely entry of sweden and finland into nato are the consequences for american security. what buchanan is talking about i think that big discussions are hardly possible today in american reality. he himself is, of course, the greatest intellectual. many times, including in our program, i recalled his book, will the united states survive until 2025, yes, and. well, and much more death. of the west, we even had a russian translation in this book, e he is a realist and that's all his work, by the way, i must say that his influence is directly very strong, almost everything that trump did is, as if he acted on the basis of this book, he will live, the forest is completely 2025. he said why we feed these europeans there. they are richer than us even on us why do we feed and in general support and with our money we keep there in south korea, we need a contingent of japanese all at all, because we have nothing plus from this, of course he had nightmare vision

and andrei andreevich well , the united states actually never hid and before the start of the ukrainian conflict, its desire to replace the world order based on the united nations with some alternative to an international order based on on actually american hegemony, because, and the so-called world based on rules is only politically correct, and the definition of american dominance of american hegemony and before the start of russia's special operation in ukraine jake sullivan and the national security adviser to the president of the united states said that the united nations is outdated and that the world needs something else. yes, i meant, just in the alliance of democracy, and under the authority of the united states and before that, the united states, too in every possible way promoted different models of alternatives. united nations organization but now it seems to me in the context of american policy towards. russia in relation to the ukrainian conflict, these attempts by the united states have sharply intensified and it is worth paying attention to how deliberately and rudely th

the united states has jumped from an era of isolationism to an era of hegemotism and the united statesexperience of equal relations and equal formation of the international order with other countries. but sooner or later they will have to learn this, and it seems to me that now is the very moment when the united states has approached this milestone, or they accept multipolarity as an inevitable and natural reality, albeit unpleasant for themselves, and learn from scratch from scratch that to exist in this multipolarity, either they suffer a very serious defeat and i don’t want that for them, because if the united states as a global superpower fails, then no one is good from this. uh, if the united states i'm sorry for the expression will calm down a bit and er start more in the long run look at their own interests and understand. what a challenge a represents for the united states in china, it would actually be quite nice for russia to have. uh, another great power superpower in addition to china's international religion. and we will continue the conversation with dmitry simons. uh, ne

real exuberance not often felt on the floor of the united states senate. we are going to be making history this week. as confident as i am of anything ever in the united states senate ever happening, this week we will confirm judge ketanji brown jackson associate justice of the united states supreme corporate limit first of all thank president biden for nominating her. his wisdom and courage are one of the reasons she is before us as a nominee in this historic vote. and to all my fellow members of the judiciary committee we have labored a long time, through many hours and i particularly thank senator durbin for his leadership. historic is a word that is often overused. even in this chamber were a lots of history is made but judge jackson's nomination truly merits that word. it is a joyous exciting moment for all americans because justice jackson will make the united states supreme court look moreri like america and hopefuly think more like america. at a time when black women and people with diverse backgrounds, religions have broken many barriers. her conf

under the russian flag or that is owned or operated by russian tryst be allowed to dock in the united states port or access our shores. this is another critical step we are taking in concert with our partners in the european union, united kingdom, canada to further deny the benefits of russia -- to russia by the economic system. putin has failed to achieve his grand ambitions on the battlefield. after weeks of shelling he have, kyiv still stands. president zelenskyy and the democratic government still remain in power. ukrainian armed forces, joined by ukrainian civilians have thwarted russia's conquest of their country. they have been bolstered from day one by a supply of weapons, ammunition, armor, intelligence from the nations of the free world led by the united states read as russia continues to grind out military advances in the brutalities against ukraine, putin is banking on us losing interest. you've heard me say this from the beginning, he was counting on nato, the european union, our allies in asia cracking and moving away. he is betting that western unity will crack. once again we

the russian fly, or that is own or operated by russian interest will be allowed to dock in the united states port for access our shores. none, none. this is yet another critical step. we take it in concert with our partners in european union, united kingdom cannon and further to deny russia the benefits of international economic system that they so enjoyed in the past. we don't know how long it will last, but as we approached the 2 month mark, here's what we do know, put in his fail to achieve his grand ambitions on the battle to. after weeks of showing keith, keith still stands, president lindsey and his democratic electric government still remained power and ukrainian armed forces joined by many brave ukrainian civilians have for the russians con question their country eman bolster from day one by an unstinting supply of weapons, ammunition armor intelligence from the nations of the free world, led by us the united states. as russia continued to grind out the military advances, and their mails or advances of the brutalities against ukraine, putting this bank in, ask, losing interest. as sp

the united states was arguing, no, this was puerto rico officers appointed by the united states.the court sided against puerto rico. now we have the case where a man who had been receivingssi benefits for years under this country and paying taxes in thi country, moves to puerto rico and then years later the government finds out he was still collecting ssi and says he is not eligible for those benefits and he had to pay back 28,000 dollars. that was the basis of the latest case. all of these cases take for granted the power of congress to do whatever it wants when it comes to puerto rico and governed by the territorial clause of the constitution as the court interpred more than 0 years ago in a series of cases known as thensular cases. this is the heart of the queson here. there were cases like door versus united states, gonzalez versus williams. all in the early decades of the 20th century. let's be clear. the insular cases happen for a century the legal underpinnings of an american colonialism. they provide legal justification for the united states to hold other nationalities an

the united states accuses iran of terrorism. whereas the united states has surrounded iran with military bases, is killed, senior iranian officials with israelis. it's assassinated people. and it has been helping terrorist groups in syria and iraq and elsewhere. so the real problem is not iran, which is in this neighborhood, it is the united states, which is a pressing iranian which is strangling iranians. and which is threatening iranians . thousands of kilometers a mile or miles away from its own border. so our hope is that the sanctions regime will and whether it's in iran or venezuela or cuba, or nicaragua, or yemen, or syria or harness on all of these are on just a barbaric. yeah, obviously the united states could be denies helping terrorism in russia is now more sanctioned than iran. we had john bolton on the show. people around the world can watch our interview on them, on youtube, except in europe, where it's on or to see the home or a u. s. a best of you. and of course with national security advisor. you said yes, sanct

but really, the united states now. if the ability to produce something, then, basically, after all, instability and various kinds of sanctions, that is, the united states really took on the role of not so much a collective suslov be, uh, how much of a collective world bank, uh, that controlled all the financial flows of the transaction, and so on and so forth. and when necessary, he opened them, when he did not need to block them, and so on. that is, this is a country that is capable of creating problems, but which has long been unable to create not images of the future for humanity and which is not able to give something positive, but is capable of really arming , say, ukraine in order for it to create problems for russia, that is, the united states this country now which has great potential, but the potential is mostly negative. uh, and this negative potential is in the hands of a person who, uh, to put it mildly. e is not fully able-bodied, and someone considers even and adequate about it after advertising. we have

we are hearing much more dangerous signals coming from washington and in particular that the united stateseeds to get directly involved in the ukraine conflict by military means. listen to what a statement was made yesterday by the well-known us senator christopher kutz, who represents the state of delaware, by the way, the same state, and the senator from which the current president of the united states, joe byte, has been for more than 30 years. if nato and the west do not come help ukrainians, i'm seriously worried that we'll see ukraine turn into syria the american people can't turn their backs on the tragedy in ukraine i think the history of the 21st century depends on how fiercely we defend freedom in ukraine well i want uh -uh, to emphasize that senator kuts said that the sanctions on the supply of weapons that the united states is now implementing to ukraine are not enough and the united states should be directly involved in the military conflict. e in ukraine k messedstovich. it's generally what they forgot about mutually assured destruction. you know i should say sorry? now i can

uh, who will be the president of the united states anti-russian oriented state, but uh, it will be muchdifficult for biden to carry out any policy if the congress is under the control of the republicans, and american power will be simply paralyzed and in these conditions. maybe that would be nice. but, and, besides, that's the whole ukrainian history. she 's for biden. after all, sometimes it goes sideways through high energy prices, which undermine the popularity of any ruling party, and now through ukrainian migration. these are the refugees from ukraine. they are now trying to get into the united states through mexico along with mexican and other hispanic refugees, and the governor of texas, greg abbott, has already said that if this continues, he calls buses and these buses will force all these refugees to the city of washington dc, where joe biden is located. so the ukrainian crisis. it has already been released and we will continue on the american expanses after advertising. i'm so glad i saw you. i haven't seen you for such a long time. if my memory serves me right, you were with

uh, the united states in this war. yes, that is, in fact. now the united states is, as it were, indirectly yes indirectly entering the war. if this, but the bill is signed, and by the president baid, also at this same ministerial meeting today. and nato general secretary hey, stolplenberg. he said that from now on, the north atlantic alliance should not make a distinction between offensive and defensive weapons and substitute offensive weapons for ukraine, and not only and not so much defensive weapons, and i want to ask our military expert alexei petrovich lyankov what this threatens us with and whether it can ? list of deliveries of offensive weapons to somehow change the situation at the front. can this pose a threat to russia and what should we do in this regard, in terms of dragging out the conflict that nato countries are counting on, there may be a lend-liss and other programs for the supply of weapons, maybe they would have played what they are counting on, but the fact is that with the supply of weapons, even offensive ones should b

the pandemic has taken a normal an enormous mental and physical toll on positions in the united states, exacerbating existing shortages and making these projections even more dire. in response, governors throughout the country, including in my home state of new york implemented emergency measures such as relaxing licensing requirements to increase the pool of available physicians. yet many states still struggle to meet the demand for care. unfortunately, our outdated immigration system only adds to the problem. foreign educated physicians who come to the united states to complete their medical training, the temporary visa options are limited. without a visa classification that is designed specifically for them, foreign physicians are forced to deal with the challenges of a flood system that was designed decades ago. after completing their training, if they want to stay here permanently and continue to treat patients in their communities, they must overcome additional obstacles. for example, the con red 30 program, which is intended to facilitate the placement of immigrant physicians in

kora came to the united states in 2003 to undergo graduate medical education and nephrology at pen state, center of medicine, the only nephrologist serving his community in missouri, served under the category of, quote, alien of extraordinary ability. despite the freedom of movement his green card afforded, dr. kora chosen to remain in paplor bluff in the under served area to treat his patients. we also welcome kristen harris, principle of immigration law, ms. harris advises healthcare entities across the united states of immigration including sponsorship of physicians, researchers, allied healthcare professionals and technical professionals, as well as e-verify and i-9 compliance, additionally, ms. harris works with the american medical association, american association of medical colleges and educational commission for foreign medical graduates which is based in philadelphia on immigration physician issues. she received bachelors degree from meryl university and jd from michigan law school. also joined boy kevin lynn, co-founder of doctors without job and see professors for immigration

any 293 was our government by the united states, not our country. so our country is still an independent state, but we are not in control of our independence were occupied. no. mm. this book over throw is an attempt to show the times that america over through foreign governments over a long period in the united states, at least in a relative sense, is declining in power in the world. and we can still remain, and i believe will still remain a potent dominant force in the world. but we need to accept that the conditions of past decades don't exist anymore. and we're not used to this. we're not ready for this psychologically. americans have always been on top, we think of ourselves is always getting our way and we're entering into a period when that's.

i often think in the united states. and particularly in united states congress. there is a confusion between operational and declaratory strategy. um, we would be a lot more advanced both the united states and as us allies in our dealings with the people's republic of china if 95% of the focus was on the clarity and consistency of our operational behavior and its cont and its and it's consistency with the coherent strategy. of deterrence as opposed to what i would describe as this continued rhetorical attraction to what we put into our declaratory strategy about the chinese on every and every day of the week. furthermore if you're emphasis is on the declaratory side rather than the operational side, then you create all sorts of opportunities to cause a fence cultural offense and and the rest which frankly clouds out your ability to deal with the substantive issues of the day. so i have a deeply realist view of how you deal with leninists those of us who come from social democratic parties like i do by the way for a hundred years since the second international in

in uh, like in the united states, uh, look at this opinion, from my point of view.ig element of truth and uh, zelensky, for all his new political capital of ostentatious self-confidence , would find it hard to go against the grain in the united states if that were to become the official line of the american government. well you remember trump treated putin in general, positively, of course, but his own administration did not always allow him to act on this basis. well, and finally, there is the congress factor, and the congress today is becoming more openly anti-russian to russia, and i would even say, to some extent, many russophobes there. i draw a distinction between a harsh stance on russian policy. well, just hostility and even hatred for everything russian, such sentiments exist in congress and with them. and it cannot but be considered if zelensky our beloved friend was said.

it is true that the lower house has already finally voted on the list in the united states of americathat is, supply in principle in essence of unlimited weapons to ukraine, and it is precisely those weapons that are emphasized not simply what is lying somewhere in warehouses in the united states or in other countries , or is it possible, which is coming out of the arsenal , is it less modern, or is it soviet weapons, namely the most modern weapons that ukraine needs weapons that will be produced by the bod of the united states of america. yes, there. as far as i understand, i read the ground press, there may be cooperative relations in production, including with european countries, moreover, it is not only about military equipment, but it is also about humanitarian help about uh, humanitarian machines, about equipment, not including by the way, about food products , and your question, uh, why was it really necessary to uh, resuscitate the law, because it really is uh, and it will be symbolic for the united states america does not say this. this is not the resuscitation of the law, th

i believe the president of the united states, his secretary of state, his national security adviser,tary of defense, when they say they don't want world war iii, especially the president of the united states who is rather old. and he still remembers the vietnam war very well, he understands how, perhaps, the danger does not really want to hope that they are not just to say that they will not just think so. and that they will seriously calculate how to avoid such a turn of events dmitry, i also really want to hope so, and uh, i would like to emphasize that the current conflict in ukraine is the first conflict in several decades , when, in fact, great powers are on opposite sides of the barricades and nuclear superpowers because it's a proxy war. yes, the united states is waging a proxy war and, uh, it's very important not to lose control of this confrontation and prevent uncontrolled escalation, but here the question arises about the quality of the elite. you just brought me to this question when you said that you believe in both presidents biden and jake sullivan and floyd austin and

but somehow reward him, but i don’t see, here i don't see any sign of, uh, the president of the united statescretary of state, his national security adviser, but talking to zelensky. come on, attack the president of germany or whatever. here, make some absolutely fantastic statements about russian culture about the russian people. i think it's what his free initiative is called, but he gets away with it, and dmitry, i completely agree with you regarding that difficult domestic political situation, a very tough external domestic political situation in which biden finds himself, of course, a year of pre-election. it's a midterm year, and biden's approval rating is a record a and inflation in the united states is high. the united states may misinterpret what is happening and misjudge. and from this it is wrong to formulate or erroneously formulate russian red lines, for example, you said that the duration, and the military operation in ukraine a led to zelensky being perceived as symbols of struggle, as symbols of singing and so on, but it seems to me that you, as a certainly very deep expert on

how the united states came out of the crisis in 1985 perestroika hmm new thinking, that is, the united america gobbled up our homeland and thanks to this meal, they postponed their crisis for several decades. so now they are going to do everything exactly the same, but how they achieved it. betrayal of the highest echelons of the soviet union, they exerted pressure on all fronts, soybean strategic defense initiative war in afghanistan support of all who fight against the soviet union, dissidents and so on and so forth, these are their tools to achieve victory and therefore today they use all the elements, ukraine war against the russians great money weapons political support, india you buy oil, in no case, do not buy germany let's review the results of the second world war, what do you need to oppose russia germany you will receive and so on and so forth japan yes the same you want to return the kuriles please we we will help you. now ukraine no longer recognizes russia's sovereignty over the kuril islands. japan is acting against the russians. well, against china and you will be fine.

at the k to 12 level, all part of the effort to destroy one of the major contributions of the united states toward democracy and believe welfare. it is still continuing. teachers began it strike in the red states, west virginia, arizona, calling for better funding for schools. so a teacher doesn't have to sit in front of 50 kids unable to teach because there are no resources and no possibility of dealing with the children. teachers were not just footing for better salaries which they richly deserved but better conditions for children and schools. they got a lot of support. i happen to be living in arizona now and i drive around tuscon where i live there were signs on lawns all over the place supporting the teachers. signs on businesses support, the teachers. they won referenda. arizona pass a freshman calling for more funning for the schools which they badly need. the relying legislature won't do it so the battle continues. but there is a major growth of liberal organizing. it has centennialed to the page labor movement, not enormous statistically speaking but there have been scattered vict

and nato are in a state of proxy war with russia , but, nevertheless, not in united states orther countries. nato is, of course, no longer hidden something that representatives of the russian leadership have spoken about many times, and we have talked about it many times in this studio. namely, that the conflict in ukraine is not about ukraine, but about the world order. and the other day, the chief of the joint chiefs of staff of the united states , general mark meely, said this, but he described this conflict in a very specific way. the security of europe is the biggest challenge for the security of europe, with the end of the second world war also at stake in the global security system, the world order that was established after 1945. he held back the clash of the great powers, his main idea was that large countries would not resort to military aggression against smaller countries. but this is exactly what we see today, if left unanswered, if russia does not incur any costs, then the current world order will cease to exist. if this the era of instability will come, so the t

additional individuals illegally into the united states and acknowledged in the footnote before that conclusion that it knew it provided authority on a case-by-case basis and relied on the parts of the administrative record to state that couldn't be used to supplement the return and said to the extent the united states were attempting to do so -- >> significant public benefit they say is when there is limited detention capacity, past practice and the current application of this somewhat vague provision authorizing the government to parole people into the united states on a case-by-case basis that they are not too dangerous. why is that wrong there's a matter of statutory interpretation. >> it is a matter of fact and interpretation. as a matter of fact let me turn you to 136. the same material my friends on the other side cited of the latest report regarding compliance and the injunction where the united states -- >> why is it wrong on a matter of interpretation? >> the united states has already interpreted what it viewed as significant public benefit and what it thinks the case by ca

in the united states, part of the united states rely on haitians.treated as humans. we need to be treated fairly. a final thought. last year, you had another earthquake, just, what, 11 years after a disastrous earthquake in 2010. you had a president assassinated. you have spiralling gang violence. you have a population that is mired in poverty. how close to despair are you about the state of your country? imean, what... i'm telling you that this situation is very hard. but haitians... myself, i'm very optimistic because in a moment like this, we come together, as we did when the president was assassinated. i was prime minister. the country need a voice, need someone who can tell them, "let's make it through." and we did. and i think in this moment like this, in a situation like this, we always, haitians come together and make the world proud that we can change the situation. it sounds like you think the person haitians need right now is you. i think haitians need a good leader. claudejoseph, we have to leave it there. thank you very much indeed forj

magistrates, the court of claims, all of the minor judicial bodies in the united states. it has no code of ethics because it has resisted had a code of ethics and its credibility now depends upon its having a code of ethics. recent events have severely imperiled credibility and trust. and that peril will grow as more becomes known about some of these events but the court can help itself by supporting a code of ethics rather than resisting it and judge jackson's commitment to talk to her colleagues about it is a very welcomed and important step. she said it in response to a question that i asked. i was the only member of the committee to ask about the code of ethics, surprisingly to me, but restoring credibility and trust will be important to our nation. her service will help restore and inspire confidence through her presence and active participation on the court will help that task of reinvigorating credibility and trust and her confirmation will be, indeed, a giant leap forward into the present and the future. and it will inspire lots of young girls, lots of young women

well i think because they're trying to stay united, sean, and keep on the united states aside and stay united against russia. so much of the rest of the world are parts of africa and asia and other parts of the world abstain. asia votes are actually very against sanctioning russia but the up until now including now, mostly european countries have supported the u. s. as any union their tenants elected. then that, that of the that'll break down to some degree and we'll see what happens with the rest of the countries. but i think it's been a real attempt to keep native together to get your opinion together here in the countries of europe. not want to aggravate united states at this point in time. indeed, now, europeans are suffering from high cost as the sanctions against russia. how do you think this will play out? i mean, how long do you think e leaders will maintain these policies? despite the outcry, i mean is the solidarity in the anti russia that hatred so strong that the politicians are lovely, ready to let their people go shattered as an impossible one. to answer it, just like it'

what kind of society do they live in but the united states i think there was never a democracy at alleally thought so, but the system was not completely different there. it was such an exemplary police state, which, in general, controlled absolutely everything. well, well, there they are. will e give some money, right? well, rather in total, again, they will mostly cut it at home, and secondly, an interesting story. yes, they are going to take away our property there, but we didn’t forbid, uh, their investments in our economy, yes, they also have a lot of all sorts of real estate, assets and so on. they just banned. therefore, our assets in america are, in fact, much less than american assets. here, of course, well, take at least the same sakhalin one sakhalin 2 is well-known projects and there is american money. it 's just the sea. i'm talking about these twenty billions that go to military aid, such a figure, of course, is large, but on the other hand. after all , the americans have already said that they have practically nothing to supply from their availability to be ordered in in

the russian flag or that is owned or operated by russian interests will be allowed to dock in a united states port or access our shores. none. none. this is yet another critical step we're taking in concert with our partners in the european union, the united kingdom, and canada and -- further to deny russia the benefits of the international economic system that they so enjoyed in the past. we don't know how long this war will last. but as we approach the two-month mark, here's what we do know: putin has failed to achieve his grand ambitions on the battlefield. after weeks of shelling kyiv, kyiv still stands. president zelenskyy and his democratically elected government still remain in power. and the ukrainian armed forces, joined by many brave ukrainian civilians, have thwarted russia's conquest of their country. they have been bolstered from day one by an unstinting supply of weapons, ammunition, armor, intelligence from the nations of the free world led by us, the united states. as russia continues to grind out the military advances and -- their military advances and the brutalities against

i would like to pay attention to 10 years ago, the united states tried to create a very large asian blockhat would include everyone asian countries, in my opinion, except for china and north korea. they wanted to. yes, they wanted to unite everyone. it didn’t work out, then it moved to indo-pacific. such a construction has become, where there are already a smaller number of states, the pacific ocean partnership, it seems that they created it, but it turned out that there are so many disagreements that japan wants one thing, india wants another, and so on and so forth. then we moved out to the fourth quarter. also, the construction did not fly, as a result, it moved out to the aukus , uh, to the top three. well, let's see if this construction works, the united states of great britain and australia, and from my point of view, the united states, uh, although they do not continue to pretend that they maintain their hegemony, in my opinion, they themselves have already understood that hegemony lost and now their policy is not directed maintenance is not about maintaining world leadership and c

yes, and she, of course, used the tool that the united states has.cythe, where there are large american bases. and kosovo, in principle, is in orbit. it is a satellite of the united states. i want to ask vladimir alekseevich. what do you think? will serbia be able to maintain this independent position for a long time when she on the one hand, it focuses on integration into the european union, on the other hand, it is friendly towards russia and does the united states really have anything to offer serbia in order for it to change its policy. well , firstly, the united states has recently been using the logic of a stick, not a carrot and offer. they don't want anything for anyone. uh, she treats europe exclusively, as her own kind of yards, in which a is possible and we will allow everything and they will not ask anyone. they will continue pressure and try to maintain this sphere of influence. well, it is desirable to expand a little towards finland. why not try? just a little closer to the red lines of russia, and here it should be noted that this pol

it's been done right now. economically, united states. it's going to grow and increase, and this ultimately turn out to be devastating. here. yeah, we've already seen the fall out of the sanctions against russia and other countries seen inflation and storing oil and gas prices. food insecurity to name, but a few. how much do you think people are prepared to put up with before they say enough? is enough not prepared to put up with it at all. this is, you know, what americans do not understand is that the russians for fighting to defend the mother like this is there. and in the, the ignorance was displayed on the part of so many people in my country about russia. and it's history of their, you know, they continue to refer to them as communist today. well, as you know, the communist party is a minority party now with the washer. and yet the americans persist in that. so as this pain increases, the americans are going to turn on the politicians. they help create this mass and every, every time job bite and tries to blame it on. most american

at the same time has now become wholly reliant on fossil fuel energy resources from the united states. they like, literally just following everything, washington tells them, i don't think that she's going to states driving these decisions by, by, by germany and the european union actually starts to start sending weapons. so the great, i think that's, that's it. just a change in european policy, which is, which is independent of the united states. i think, i think germany has been realizing, you know, for the last few years that you can't rely on the united states. and so, you know, i mean, that's part of the, the sort of a time to kind of reach a new, a new relationship with russia, which you could say would be a total failure. but, but nevertheless, you know, that doesn't mean it wasn't a good idea to try and i, you know, i, i think, yeah, i think, i think they'll be, you know, where, where else in the, what else in the short run do you do in terms of buying energy, you know, so you have to turn to the united states, but i, i, i don't agree without assessment. i think i think the eur

moreover, china, unlike the united states, does not disperse its forces with the states, all over thelanet. they are concentrated mainly in e. along the chinese coast, too, china's aviation has recently significantly increased e, china's missile force of its own air force is also sufficient. therefore, if, uh, there is some kind of armed clash, even with uh behind the actions of only general forces, the americans will have a very difficult time. moreover, uh allies uh militarily, let's say, representing a significant force. first, there is no united states in this region, because japan and south korea, their armed forces are mainly forces for the protection of their own national territory, but in no way carrying out any operations outside their national territories. uh, so more than that, uh their uh, so to speak, the influence of china with all the economic on these countries first of all. for example, to south korea, it costs a lot, that's the example, when the americans deployed the that system there and after that the chinese staged a boycott. uh, korean goods, trashed the store.

and what is interesting is that it is becoming obvious inside the united states outside the united states that the moral leadership of the united states has long been undermined either in china or in india or in pakistan or in brazil or in south africa, and one can go on listing these countries, no one perceives america as moral or some kind of idealistic. eh, this landmark is long gone. i wonder what went on inside america. this is a cheat that no, we still have ideals. now healthy voices are being heard, and in the most people understand, although there have been huge scandals. including a huge number of people from senior management. she was simply accused of open pedophilia and nothing and nothing happened. but you are absolutely right. if really on the surface. yes, at nato meetings, uh, these leaders of european countries are discharged by america itself, they can bow down to really recognize american leadership, then people even in these european countries do not consider america to be some kind of moral model. i've visited 170 countries in my life, and to be honest, with the excep

we have support from our partners in this activity and thank you to the united states. thank you madame speaker for your leadership in support of ukraine and for your understanding of the challenges of our country. because of this terrible war. so thank you to the people of the united states for the grateful support of my country and we hope we will win. the aim of russia is too great the next crisis. now they create migration crisis. the aim is to create a food crisis so i hope the united states will also have a leadership position in this direction and will support ukraine and all of the countries to stop the russians. so thank you and it is a great honor for me to be here. speaker pelosi: thank you, prime minister shmyhal. we will now go to a bipartisan meeting -- leadership meeting, where we will again be inspired, as well as informed, by the prime minister as to the priorities that we need to be addressing. our support has always been bipartisan. it will continue to be. thank you, mr. prime minister. es. >> good afternoon. i would like to welcome everyone joining u

winning a decisive military victory in this war, but because bloomberg has already stated, for example, that even the unitedpleting their resources in the field of armaments of military equipment, substituting them for ukraine, and russia is already grinding up to a quarter of the american stingers delivered to ukraine. that is , it turns out that the west cannot even military even the combined resources of the collective west cannot inflict. russia is defeated, but russia is winning. this is a very serious reputational damage, and thirdly, and here is the importance of, uh, the visit of blinkin austin to kiev a and the further holding of the event in ramstein. thing is the united states has indeed changed its rhetoric. and more clearly formulated strategic goals. that is, we are really dealing with a hybrid war, the united states is already openly saying that the conflict in ukraine is not about ukraine, that it is about their leadership, it is on the international order about the place and role of both russia and the united states in this world order. and somehow they believe that if they are a party to t

to access of the united states. -- we have time uniting for you and ukraine. refugee process for which we have deployed our personnel overseas. and of course, the visa programs and department of state traditionally and historically has administered. as a category of individuals, the ukrainians are not necessarily exempt from title 42. we provide individualized exemptions that pending on acute vulnerabilities. claims of under the convention against torture. -- implementing safe and orderly pathways so that individuals do not travel to mexico with the intent of crossing through a port of entry. and into the united states, that is not the safest way to proceed. that is precisely one of the reasons, just one of the reasons why we implemented the measures that i have described. to build an orderly and safe way to provide humanitarian relief. and the proudest tradition of this country. >> okay, well thank you. thank you secretary and last, year dhs designated haiti for temporary protective status to haiti. and making that decision, dhs noted that haiti is grappling w