and as a consequence of the united states not recognizing the claims of independence, that for the philippines that emilio aguinaldo had stated. so we are telling the story of these events that happened 125 years ago through portraiture. why do we make that decision to do it that way? well, that way we can make this history personal. we can understand the agency of different individuals in this history. i think the us public is perhaps more familiar with figures such as theodore roosevelt. you know, who was second in command of the roughriders, for example. and there's a whole mythology around him, right? or president william mckinley. but what we do in this exhibition is that we put those portraits in conversation with portraits of figures from cuba, from puerto rico, from guam, from the philippines, from hawaii. in order to complete that narrative, to complete the history, to present the different perspectives, and really to provide a panoramic outlook into these history. well, we do start with president mckinley. he's right here, 25th, president of the united states. why is he important to

is that country which ultimately as a madeline albright one said the united states stands taller and looks further. and therefore, it is essentially superior to the rest of us. we, we are less, are people then lesser states, them the united states. and therefore, when they send back that they sense that they are superior, then they have exceptional rights. and when they do something, which we consider to be evil, they don't consider it to be able at god most i'll say it's a mistake, like any rock by and beating the country and destroying the company, they then baited and destroyed the country. they never said that we did evil at most. so say it was that there was a mistake. now i know that you were born and spoke to your formative for gene, a chairs and the united face. and then at a certain point of time, you returned to iran, you're also volunteer. it's a 25 and the iran iraq war you were subjected to, to a chemical weapons attack. and i want to ask you, it's a personal question, but i think it's a very valid in this day and age. did you ever have to face a moment the choosing

k was partner with united states in iraq was partner with united states in the, in i've got a son, was partly with united states in my country, syria. so old and oh, it doesn't indicate that the indications are not really positive. i'm not sure. really. 100 percent positive and optimistic about it. however, the pressure by the people was amazing today outside the outside the court. and i hope this continues to model. and i hope there would be further steps because the people have to continue the sit ins and they have to block the exit. absolutely. and aside from the, from any, from the, from the prison, if they try to expedite the him or put him in a, in a plan because they say, if the decision is made to model to expedite him, he may be put in a plan in a matter of few hours, and the stella and his wife and the legal team would not have enough time to take the issue to appear in court for human rights to vocal nasty. i'm at least experts in seriana analysis to tell found the many thanks for your time. appreciate it, a policy renewal. the license on the judy massage cases. we followed

that's not going to solve the problem for the united states, the united states as a declining power. and it has to begin to look at reality objectively. otherwise, it will suffer more than anyone else. all right, right. that's that thanks so much for waiting so patiently before it again, i ask you a specific questions you just want to uh, want to come in on on what you've heard to you the yeah, sure. i think the, you know, trying to build a narrative between good guys and bad guys, no matter who is on the good and bad, isn't really helpful to trying to understand what is going on. of course, both the, your audience and the americans pursued their interests. they pursued politically, economically, mid the territory, how they could maintain as much influence as possible in the, in, in the, in the region. now what's become there is that the americans have had more of an ingle here is to their foreign policy withdrawing at times. coming back in really being unable to maintain strong influence. and if you look at the other side that your audience has, the, your audience have built strong

united states. the vice president. the united states. all right. i'll i'll let you talk in a minute. yeah. the vice president, united states went out to a buddhist monastery, a buddhist monastery, and he asked monks and nuns to renounce their vows of poverty, pay thousands of dollars in campaign contributions. so they could spiritually commune with him. and then he said he didn't know where he was. perhaps those folks. perhaps get crowded out here anyway. perhaps those folks in saffron robes and all that incense might have given him a clue. but really, what was most outrageous then, the vice president, united states, goes before the american people, grips the podium and says there's no controlling legal that there was no controlling legal authority for all this these shenanigans all this this incredible debasement of the institutions of government. well, i want to tell you, my friends, i'm going to give him a controlling legal authority. i'm going to give him a controlling ethical authority. and then i'm going to beat al gore like a drum. and send

one of our senior united states senators from the state of new york, chuck schumer said yesterday, i believe that we have to continue to fund the ukrainian efforts for us soldiers. citizens could wind up finding their how do you assess that? so this is a publication and a cheap publication. if that i do not understand why american soldiers should fight in ukraine. there are most scenarios from the united states. they're the biggest number of, most scenarios comes from poland, with most scenarios from the united states and the 2nd place, and mercenaries from georgia in 3rd place as well. if somebody has the desire to send regular troops, that would certainly bring humanity on the brink of a very serious global conflict. this is obvious to the united states need this. what for thousands of miles away from your national territory, don't you have anything better to do? you have issues on the border issues with migration issues, with the national debt. more than $33.00 trillion dollars. you have nothing better to do so you should fight in ukraine. wouldn't it be better to negotiate with r

a strong united states military, capable diplomatic corps and robust outcomes will give awes chance that 250 years from now, the 76th or 79th secretary of state can sit here with his democrat counterpart from previous administration and still have the opportunity to defend what we hold most sacred. thank you for giving me the opportunity to be with you today. i look for your questions. >> thank you, mr. pompeo. mr. panetta we look forward to your comments. >> thanks for inviting me to testify on the increasing threat posed by the people's republic of china and its ongoing efforts to undermine the united states and allied interests around the world. and thank you for having me join with my good friend mike pompeo, who we worked together when he was in my job as director of the cia and continued to be in touch during the time he was secretary of state. mike and i are good friends and i'm glad that we are here to be able to present our views. i also want to thank this committee, the fact that you are a bipartisan committee working on this issue is incredibly important to our foreign policy

when is the united states going to do with the united states pledged to do. defend democracy andy tate -- and dictatorship. >> europe still needs to do more. as of last summer only 11 of the nato allies, that still needs to be done and applaud what germany is doing to get there hopefully this year. there are so many european allies. with regards to the united states, we are democracies. it takes time to get there. so for example the europeans haven't gotten to 2% yet. it takes time to bring democracies along. we will get there with regards to making adjustments. there may be different paths to get there. i'm reminded of winston churchill's quote americans will do the right thing after exhausting all other possibilities. i do think we will get there, it's just democracies take time to process. >> is there enough time for the democratic process. >> hearing about the two europeans here. what senator angus king told me that the united states is 15th in terms of defense spending. and other european countries are spending more frankly. giving all to the 2%. that's

except the united states of america. and so i want to keep the united states strong. for some reason, people in this state understand. and what i mean when i say at the charleston shipyard or here in this part of south carolina, keep the united states of america strong. i am proud to have served with the president that has achieved something that no other president in the nuclear age is achieved. he's hammered out an arms control agreement that's verifiable and that for the first time in the nuclear age gets rid of an entire generation of nuclear weapons, good arms control, good national security. and we got it because we we understand the soviets, we are tough in negotiating with the soviets. and you, the people of south carolina backed us as we strengthened the military of the united states of america. so keep the country strong. but don't be afraid then to a step for peace. and that's the kind of president i'd like to be. i'd like to build on these arms control agreements. i want to see those conventional forces in balance in europe. i'd love to be the president to

, a united states that wasn't run by bankers and businessmen, but a united states where peoplecome, you know, we shall overcome, we shall overcome, we shall overcome some day, oh deep in my heart, i do believe, we shall overcome someday, we shall live. in peace, we shall live in peace, we shall live in peace some day, oh deep in my heart, i do believe, we shall live in peace someday. will walk hand in hand, will walk hand in hand, and all the peace shall overcome, he shall overcome some day, what if i all that do, oh we shall overcome some, we walk hand in hand, we walk hand in hand, we are, either you're with us. لو وافق صدام على كل قرارات الامم المتحده وعلى كل ما تريده الولايات المتحده لكان قد اطيح به كان المفروض عندما يسقطون النظام يسلمون الدوله للمعارضه هم اسقطوا النظام والدوله معا وسلموا المعارضه صراع على السلطه اول من وجه ضربه للامريكي. في فتره ترامب جاءوا وقالوا بصراحه هذا انتهى عليكم ان تتخذوا موقف اما معنا او ضدنا. palestine has risen from the ashes, the nation has gone a long way in its struggle against the occupation regime of israel from throwing stones to flying dr

the united states the seed of a republican government in the world, the united states in 1817, when monroe became president, the only republic in the western world. so he decided to use his annual message to congress which was the equivalent today we refer to it as the state the union address, but it was the major policy statement issued by the government each and everybody paid a lot of attention to it. so monroe knew that if he said something in this in his message that it would receive a lot of attention and people would pay attention to it. a lot of the message was was standard information given to congress of issues that congress would be dealing with in the upcoming session, that the state of the army, state of the navy improvements, the the the national budget, these sorts of things. but part of the way through he was talking. foreign relations and he brought up the subject of a negotiation with russia, referring to russian interests in expanding its territory in the in what is now the pacific northwest east. and in talking about this and about the upcoming negotiations

the united states is a free worker economy. at's why you can buy land from private citizens in this country. state actors can exploit that kind of systemic difference were to come to the united states, by a huge chunk of land from private owners and that is okay but you cannot do the same in china. that is why the u.s./china competition we talk about the competition with china. the economic, military, really talk about the systemic ways because its function totally differently we have to really deal with the system and fundamental. not just an economic and technology. it is just another member of the free trading system. >> are there be a policy against foreign nationals or at least chinese foreign nationals from buying large swaths of farmland near military bases? >> there are legal ways to do so. through the organization. you have to go through a process to make sure you are buying american assets. part of your properties legally you have no connection with malign actors such as a state actor like the chinese government. there

shah was acting as puppet in west asia for the united states during the vietnam war, the unitedjets that were sold to iran to attack vietnamese and we have passage in the memories of mother that one day shah went to his mother and was quite upset and the mother asked the shah, why are you upset? and the answer was that the americans have taken these fighter jets from iran without even notifying me, meaning the show, so the relationship between the shah and nixon kissenger those years... actually led to the revolution, because what wanted from nexon, after giving all these services to nixon was to leave the internal affairs of oppressing the people of iran to the shah, so cia had huge office in tehran, iran was actually the hub of cia operations in the middle east, and the cia didn't realize... 'there is going to be a revolution until it was too late and the reason for that was that it was an agreement between the shaw and the nexon administration to leave iran alone in terms of how shah was running the country in terms of oppressing the the revolution came in 1979 in such a envi

wants to drive the... palestinans out of gaza and to maintain a permanent occupation, the the united states wants to get an agreement which will allow for some kind of palestinian administration in gaza and and the agreement of the the arab states who are allied to the united states, so there are differences and that's why there is some tension between. "we are we know that the united states is pressing on for a type of cease fire and we know that benny gants um the israeli minister this week said that there were promising signs so there is obviously something um substantial underway in the these negotiations which um uh is are being mediated by qatar, egypt and others um but nevertheless there is this tension in the war aims and until that is resolved" "and until the united states puts real pressure upon israel to settle, then the the war will continue okay, this uh uh failure as you mentioned, masu shajara of the international organizations, and i believe you're referring to the un, i'm guessing in this case in point, um, it's not going to get solved, right? i mean, we don't, i don't if t

this is allows the investment for the united states. we're not getting rich out of this, you're not benefiting from this. this is a waste of money and a waste of time and a waste of lives. but it is quite persistent. and one reason why it process is that when the soviet union ended in december 1991, the people in charge and those who came to be in power felt, you know, there's really no obstacle we can do what we want. so part of it is an incredible arrogance, that everything anyway isn't going to be very expensive. these people are not very clever. i, in my opinion, that are in power in the united states. they spent 7 trillion dollars in afghanistan and in a rock ukraine, syria, libya. what have we gotten for it? nothing. let me ask you about the people because uh, the united states, private cellphone being a democracy in the model one. and as you wrote, all those failed war, since 2000 have caused the american people around 5 trillion dollars in direct outlays, or around for $2000.00 per household, there are many indirect expenses as

the united state by far the biggest ally. it is a great advantage even for the united states. together with native allies, we have said 50% of the world's gdp. there is no reason the u.s. should do with china alone. we are so much stronger. nato is a good deal for the united states. it is good for the european allies but also the united states. i expect all the messages we need from next summer will be in a more dangerous world. because we live in a more unpredictable and dangerous world. >> thank you.

the united states political establishment lives in a bubble. they continue to think that they are the most important country in the world by far, that they can see to call up their opponents because they are exceptional because they are destined to be different than god. i think that's the most appropriate description of their perception of themselves. so this route, this way, the machine is very similar. they see themselves as gods chosen people. even those who are secular and israel a somehow are they believe in something which they don't believe exist. paradoxically, or they, they're not religious, but they somehow believe that they are exceptional, that sense of americans and that sense of uh, exceptionalism and israel, i think rates a complacency that is similar to what we try to, to what we see in the united states. and so there's rarely don't consider the palestinians to be human beings equal to them with capabilities. who can be brilliant. and i think that's what basically destroyed this whole narrative about this invincible is rarely a

, the recession in japan, the recession in germany , the recession in great britain, and about united statestion about the state of the economic system in general at the present moment, why and whether, yes, and whether there can be a recession in all peripheral american, in fact, parts of the american economy and not in the united states itself, in fact, itself connected. audi of other various cars, but in fact this is a very serious story based on the accusation that some of these spare parts, these cars in china were created in the western sino-ugur autonomous region, how to understand this, how did they understand this and so on, this this is the third question, this didn’t happen before, before the maximum was clothes of the lenin brand, which no one in russia knows anywhere, that is, it means like a copy of adidas, or maybe they have their own chinese sports brand, that was the maximum , now these are... premium mobile phones that germany produces together with china, that is , this is a simultaneous blow to china against germany, that is, these are already signals for the use of this

texas is the largest oil producer in the united states. n amounted to 1.8 billion barrels per year. the southern state is also an important cattle-raising center and a major cotton producer. it accounts for almost half of all production. in recently, texas has begun to create attractive conditions for innovation. hewlett packard moved its office from silicon valley to houston, followed by companies such as tesla and oracle. texas relies on more than just its economic strength. it even has its own power system. there are three of them in the usa, the east coast, the west coast and separately texas. this has led to a serious crisis in 2021. cold snowfalls provoked increased energy consumption, because its transmission between power systems is difficult. during the cold snap left texas isolated. frosts caused wind farms to shut down. in canada , their blades are heated, but in the southern state this is not the case. the compressor points of gas stations are also not equipped with heating, the cooling sensors of the local nuclear power plant a

let's listen to what the adviser to the president of the united states of america , joseph biden, jake salevan said. the reality is that... putin wins every day that ukraine does not get the resources it needs, and ukraine suffers. and there is a strong bipartisan majority in the house of representatives that is ready to pass this bill if it is brought up for consideration. and this decision rests on the shoulders of one person. history is watching to see if speaker johnson will bring this bill up for a vote. if he does, the bill will pass and ukraine will get what it needs to achieve. success, if not, we will not be able to give ukraine the tools it needs to stand up to russia, and putin will be the main beneficiary of that. jake sullivan says the right words, but ladies and gentlemen, what is the problem with ukrainian the question hung in the congress of the united states of america, it is exclusively an internal american question, or is it because... that this is how it is happening now, and there is some fault on the part of the ukrainian side, that the ukrainian side may not have

the united states is doing everything possible. it seems to try and convince countries not to talk into belt and road initiative. what do you make of that? of that tit for tat? that consternation that's going on between the united states, the west really and president she, china, and the mountain road. so 1st of all, i want to say b r i caught a initiative is not about a one country or a lines is an id or a vision shared by countries and when i visions around roadways no political agenda . i know screens attached as low as one find a vision or even some projects attractive. one could have seen play a joint including all the you're paying and the u. s. companies. chinese sophie shows have emphasized many times that the b r ice door is wide open for the us and a european countries. the essence of the b r. i isn't about dictating terms, but encouraging partnerships. so increasingly, if we look closely, european to us have already become part of this initiative. in many ways, several eastern european countries have signed the b r i agr

and zenest organizations who have full support by the united states government and the you know across the... whether democrats or republicans, look, who's building these colonies in the west bank? it's organizations like the jewish national fund that is fully supported and tax exempt, you know, most of the settlers who are in the west bank actually comes from you know the united states, from new york and chicago and boston and you know and also from canada and europe, these are a classic example of western colonization and palestine, some of these settlers don't even speak hebrew, they speak, fluid english with no accent, and so at one hand, the united states is responsible for these settlers and their actions and you know their behavior, and on the other hand, the united states is worried about the crumbling of the palestinian authority in the west bank, which gives a more of a present and strength to the palestinian resistance. so they really are worried about israel and these settlers more than they're worried about the palestinians, but at the same time the united states wa

and it's not just the united states. it doesn't have clothes, it's a european union, and it's many people that are a part of this global football. it's people that have done things for power and money, and they've stepped over bodies for generations. and i think that that's, that is coming home to roost, right? now and the people around the world are starting to see that these people have bad intentions in mind and then press the button. history will, will tell a different story. and i believe he will be told as a story is a very, very, very, a good man. it just one final, a brief point if i count on the reaction to tucker carlson doing this, he, he has been threatened with punishment by some commentators upon his arrival back in the us. it was said by some senior u. e u lawmakers that he shouldn't be allowed access into europe after this. do you see any reaction which would be significant in him doing his job going forward, perhaps even his liberty in any way? well, let's look at the martin luther king. let's look at th

leaders in the united states congress, mustl in the united states congress, must be in the united statestheir opposition _ be unified in their opposition. their opposition to— be unified in their opposition. their opposition to russia's . their opposition to russia's aggression _ their opposition to russia's aggression as— their opposition to russia's aggression as indicated - their opposition to russia's i aggression as indicated over their opposition to russia's - aggression as indicated over the course _ aggression as indicated over the course of— aggression as indicated over the course of the _ aggression as indicated over the course of the last _ aggression as indicated over the course of the last two _ aggression as indicated over the course of the last two years - aggression as indicated over the i course of the last two years plus, and the _ course of the last two years plus, and the last — course of the last two years plus, and the last 24 _ course of the last two years plus, and the last 24 hours. _ course of the last two years plus, and the last 24 hours. and - course of the l

we're now we want to cooperate the united states. the way you're still yeah, to me dominance as an agenda. i mean if we look at it objectively, if i also have to have some business planned to it. if you want, i'd share with you need to calculate the names of the goals and to make sure that you know, your, your balance to these is in order from what you're saying. and from what you've been writing, it appears that the united states just claims dominance, but it doesn't do any sort of homework to ensure that it has the resources, the capacity is the strategy, the tactics to insure, and without it, i don't understand how these people imagine the dominance will stay with them. i mean, it's like it's, it's not just wishful thinking. it seems to be a, you know, they say, well, perhaps, yeah, but yeah, so, and so the answer is, uh, the answer is 1st, they live in the past. i because the us was relatively more powerful in 1992 by the clearly lives in the past year. how we use it, use a man of the past that a lot of my former colleagues at ha

well, if we talk about the status of the election campaign in general now in the united states, mr.you... then write off niki geli, because the primaries from the caucuses show that, in principle , biden really is from the democrats, from the republicans mainly, in trump has success, but there are other candidates, and is everything for them decided by your feeling and your opinion , well the democrats for sure, there is actually one candidate, dean phillips, the congressman from minnesota, and his only complaint about joe biden is that he thinks that joe biden is too much. old to be president, well, it is not taken seriously by the vast majority of voters, the democrats, of course, this will be confirmed, but today is the democratic primary in south carolina, and the republicans, look, nikki haley, in my opinion, has no chance , if trump, will not to remain a candidate, that is, if somehow, say, through the courts. convictions , it's not going to turn out that he's going to be ineligible because the republican primaries, they're like, average, regular, registered republicans, come

is you guessed it, our country, the united states. in fact, this morning is from the us based thing. tech. it's called, pacific rim. could look them up. they're telling countries interested in joining the b r i not to like don't because it will result they say in the chinese having access and control over their communications, their surveillance, their media, and at the book they're going to spy on them. that's not all effective. that's not scary enough. there's this. now, remember the image of the presidents she and putting together. let's go back to that. the us media is tv networks and newspapers have been pouncing and then use that as a bludgeoning tool against the b r i. even the wall street journal, good newspaper chimed in with this very, very, very critical reports. it's not a ringing endorsement, right? nor was one expected. but something happened on the way to the this year's b r i summit, that suddenly shifted the world's focus elsewhere. it also puts she in a very difficult role of playing both summit host and participate

a decline of the influence of the united states, the united states alliance even have repeatedly express the difference of paintings on policies. for example, towards china, against the united states. i think all of a wage have forced the united states to change some approaches in order to realize east own interest. i mean, meanwhile, and i'm looking forward to having another discussion with you because we're out of time. but, i mean there's, there's the taiwan issue. there is the chip or issue that you alluded to. there's uh, you know, united states military exercises in the south china sea. there's the build up of some of the islands on the south china sea and that whole pacific rim discussion is a fascinating conversation for another time. i will look forward to due to having that with you. and a guy is a host and a reporter for see gtm radio. it's a delight to be able to have this conversation with her so that we can all learn perspectives that we don't often take into account. thank you so much. and it's a pleasure talking to you. rake is, as i, as i earlier, our mission is a great

and the potential advantage of the russian federation due to the non-supply of weapons by the united states to ukraine, and this... that risk, which, unfortunately, can have truly catastrophic consequences, not purely for us, as for the state, but also for the european continent and indeed for the global world, in accordance with those potential new costs and including the insane human resource on the part of the united states, which today prefer not to notice, and in particular radical republicans in the united states, well, america, i mean. this is the right-wing radical wing of the republicans, and we call on the fact that, even this moderate part of the republican party, the democratic party, this center, which is constantly emphasized, whose representatives constantly emphasize their readiness to support ukraine, still decide this the question, if possible, can be taken out, say, from all these arrangements. israel, in my opinion, it is just as possible to withdraw aid from all these agreements ukraine and consider then the purely foreign policy aspect separately, but ... you and i und

of course the united states has stated its position and we have stated our position on palestine and the prosecution of war there. so that's true. but at the same time, i think our position on palestine remains principled, anchored in the united nations security council resolutions. but right now we have different sets of priorities in pakistan. i think it should not directly or indirectly affect our relations with the united states. daniel: all right, i'm cognizant of the time, ambassador. i really appreciate you coming today. i hope to get to pakistan this year. i really appreciate you coming to visit. as i said at the beginning, i want you to consider csis second home in washington. i'm grateful to the folks who came out today. i thank my friend and colleague ambassador raphel for being here. and please join me in thanking the pakistani ambassador to the u.s. [applause] thanks a >> we

no short answer: it is, the united states and the united kingdom combined are demonstrating that the the're doing the equivalent of pun punching a bag of jello keeps moving around, we don't have any clear idea where the different missiles are, the the his have mobile missile systems, so they're very difficult to... "it's attached to the ship and it fires a very rapid rate, almost like solid sheet of metal coming out, but it's the last line of defense. what this means is that the hoothies fired an anti-ship missile that penetrated every other line of defense, and that was the thing that saved that ship, so i think it's just matter of time before the hoothies are going to sink one or more of these us or uk ships. uh, wow, that's interesting. ray, what about that? you just heard what larry said, i mean the last..." line of defense, i mean, what does that mean when we're talking about uh, a group like ans law or the yemini military uh being able to stand up or deal with the united states in this manner? well, there are people in washington that just can't believe that we could possibly l

overall assessment of uh uh what the uh resistance has been doing and and the reaction uh by the united states. now elijah talked about basically it's like a waining superpower because uh even they're attacking non-state actors, but we have seen it from what. we're talking about iraq or whether we're talking about from lebanon, whether we're talking about from yemen or syria um that the uh resistance had been very persistent especially since october the 7th in trying to uh defend the palestinians and to stop this genocide there, your overall assessment. okay, unfortunately julia, i cannot hear you, um, hopefully... we can we reestablish hopefully that uh contact uh well elijah i'm going to pose that question to you until we can fix that technical issue with julia uh overall as i was saying we look at what is happened and we look at the resistance front whether we're talking about yemen are we talking about lebanon or hizbullah are we're talking about in syria and iraq and and the way it has been consistent and persistent and putting pressure, trying to put pressure on the zionist regime and al

government wants to drive the palestinians out of gaza and to maintain a permanent occupation, the the united states" wants to get an agreement um which will allow for some kind of palestinian administration in gaza and and the agreement of the the arab states who are allied to the united states, so there are differences and that's why there is some tension between them. we we know that the united states is pressing on for a type of ceasefire, and we know that... against um the israeli minister this week said that there were promising signs, so there is obviously something um substantial underway in the these negotiations which um is are being mediated by qatar, egypt and others, um, but nevertheless there is this tension in the war aims and until that is resolved and until the united states puts real pressure upon israel to settle then the the war will continue. okay, this uh uh failure as you mentioned, masu shajara of the international organizations, and i believe you're referring to the un, i'm guessing in this case and point, um, it's not going to get solved, right? i mean, we don't, i don't if

will start investing in europe again , and the united states, the united states also needs somethingeat, from the united states this nutritional base has ended, and if not russia and ukraine, lead brix this year, but at the very moment when they were trying to make russia an outcast, brix colleagues suggested: “let’s russia at this moment gather a dozen countries, and, as always, 30-40 countries who support there will come, gather in the person of the leaders, and we will discuss the fate of the world. by the way, what interesting things will happen this year, and these are just these glimpses of the future of the new world, which does not want, does not want admit the united states, now." they offer to solve their problems for the unfortunate europe. by and large, we are now seeing that europe is deciding on europe the greatest responsibility that no union could handle; it now has to answer for the whole world, despite the fact that god knows what is going on inside itself. vasily, today africa, the arctic, asia are those parts of the world that will attract attention. analyst, we w

, a united states that wasn't run by bankers and businessmen, but the united states where peoplethe flag, boys, rally once again, shouting the battle cry of freedom, yes, we'll rally round the hillside, we'll rally from the plains, shouting the battle cry of freedom, you know, there's that, and then there's like a calmer one they talk about, we shall overcome, you know, we shall overcome, shall overcome, we shall overcome some day, oh deep in my heart, do believe, we shall overcome someday, we shall live in peace, we shall live in peace, we shall live in peace some day, oh deep in my heart, do believe, we shall live in peace someday, will... walk hand in hand, will walk hand in hand, all the peace shall overcome, we shall over come some day, what if in my... god and all that i do, oh we shall overcome some, we walk hand in hands, heal our hand in hand, hell and nations the first out of the exercise as part of the 24. named after the longest river in the world, it's now become the largest e-commerce company on the planet. it started as a bookseller at discount prices, but grew so