sworn an oath to uphold the constitution six times in my career, including as vice president, as a united statesenator, and as a top law enforcement officer of the largest state in our country. responsible for upholding and enforcing the laws of the state and the united states was the work i did. and i have never wavered in upholding that oath. and i have always executed it faithfully and without reservation. [applause] and therein lies the profound difference between donald trump and me. he, who violated the oath to uphold the constitution of the united states of america, and make no mistake, he, who if given the chance, would violate it again. donald trump lost the 2020 election. [cheers and applause] and as you have heard and know, he refused to accept the will of the people and the results of an election that was free and fair. as you have heard, he sent an armed mob to the united states capital, where they assaulted law enforcement officers. he threatened the life of his own vice president and refused to engage in the peaceful transfer of power. and let us be clear about how he intends to u

181 rockets, but this massive enough was shelled, biden has already ordered the military of the united states of america to shoot down... launched by iran against israel, the mass media reported with reference to the white house. well, the iranian islamic guard corps of the revolution said that israel would face devastating attacks if it responded to an iranian missile strike. so, vitaliy, i congratulate you and thank you for promptly joining our broadcast. greetings, good evening. so, what is the possible course of events after this massive attack by iran? israel, well, we see that this attack did not lead to any serious consequences, practically, we cannot talk about the people who died during this attack, only two people were slightly injured in tel aviv, after another such situation related to... what happened with this massive shelling, so in that sense, of course, we can say that this attack ended the same way as the previous one, although this attack was more intense, well, with ballistic missiles, first of all, than its previous attack, this is of course a rather serious strike, well.

they don't just received the balls thrown by the united states, we lead the united states -- come to the middle of the plate. no, don't, less is more. low down, offspeed pitch. in between the pitcher and catcher, we welcome the game strategy together with our teammates. we are a good regular catcher. i am very interested and strongly hope and believe that there is no limit to human ingenuity and the u.s.-japan alliance can go further ahead. chris: thank you. i love the baseball metaphor. i find myself thinking of o htani shohei, a japanese baseball player who can both hit and pitch. let's talk about where we have been. there have been profound changes in the international system during the time you all have been involved in the relationship from the end of the cold war, collapse of the soviet union, war on terror, conflicts in iraq and afghanistan, great power competition between the united states and china. the war in ukraine of course. when you think about the evolution of this alliance and where we are today, how important do you think structural factors were in driving us? the ba

it might eventually drag the united states in, which is something of course the united states doesn't want either on. so you ought to be thinking about the long term strategic consequences and the nuclear dimension as well as we try to evaluate what the long term here is going to be. this sounds to me a lot like george bush, richard cheney the golf for the thinking that you could come in and, you know, fundamentally change the entire region. i mean, i'd be interested in your thoughts, are we back to america thinking that the, the us and it's ally have the ability to completely reshape the region and make the region safe for democracy. create safety after the kind of militaristic dimension is taking now. yeah, well, as i said, as a very beginning, you know that this did remind me of george bush and the mission accomplished moment when we suddenly thought we were going to re shake them at least. and it didn't work out any of the ways that the neo conservatives invoice expected people have been predicting that iran would have another revolution. another of people that the clerical regime

but the second thing that draws attention is that i did not hear the warning that the united states wills consequences for iran, or maybe it's not the secretary of state's business to say such things, i think it's not the secretary of state's business, i think the final decision has not been made in washington yet, i think there are very active... consultations going on now between the united states and israel to what extent, because you know, elections are coming up now, to start a war with a completely unpredictable outcome in the middle east, it's guaranteed, to reduce your chances of winning democratic, the democratic party, so what blinken hypocritically says is that this. iran in turn will be forced, so to speak, to escalate. i expect an escalation. well, we have discovered one thing regarding israel, we have discovered an incorrect expression, and we have seen once again that netanyahu is a man without brakes, that he is ready for anything. and that he does not just need a victory, but he needs a very visible, obvious victory to extend his stay in power. do you think that this can

what does this put the position of the united states in? it would make it appear that first, that the communist venezuela, which they do not, because they are a very small minority. and second, it would make it appear that a representative of the united states was being blackmailed, that he was afraid go and to face up to these demonstrators. and i can only say that as far as our foreign policy is concerned, it seemed to me that it was essential that we not show a picture to the world of a representative of the united states, in effect, putting his tail between, his legs and running whenever the communists happened to make a threat of this type. and may i say to in that connection, i think the developments since have proved that it was right to go. right to go, because by going the communists overplayed their hands. and all over latin america. some government leaders who previously didn't believe that the communists were a real danger or that they would resort to violence, now have changed their views. and also, i think that it was a plus f

at the battle, the united states captures confederate children and the confederates capture united states soldiers. if succession is illegal, which is the position of the united states from day one, then the confederate army is not an army of another nation. the confederate army is a terrorist organization, an organization of pirates, an organization of bushwhacker's. it is not an -- a legitimate army. the question becomes, how do you treat confederate p.o.w.s. lieber, who is not yet working for the u.s. government but is at columbia, writes an open letter in the new york times dealing with the question of confederate prisoners. this is the beginning of a law of war. what lieber says is you have to recognize the reality of war. it does not matter whether we recognize the legitimacy of the confederate government. what matters is we recognize that there is a war going on and therefore, you should treat the prisoners humanely as prisoners of war, rather than shooting them or hanging them because after all, if they are pirates, if they are not legitimate, then you treat them accordingly. what

a drug overdose in the united states of america. we've got schools in the state of north carolina that are overwhelmed with children who don't even speak english because they were brought here by illegal aliens. now, what does it do to the education quality of our own children? when you put thousands of people in the schools who don't even speak their language? we know what that means. that means administrators, that means teachers, that means people who are going to focus on illegal aliens instead of american citizens. and look, i don't begrudge anybody who wants to come to the united states of america and have a better life. but i think two things, number one, they ought to do it properly come through the legal channels, come through the right way like millions of people have done in the united states of america. but more importantly, i do not think that the leadership of the united states, that the compassion of our leaders should be focused anywhere but on the best interests of the american citizenry who belong in this country. t

the united states army. he has already signed the militia act of 1862, which, for the first time since the revolution authorized, since the enlistment of blacks as soldiers in the united states army. and so his i would free none of the slaves simply is not on the table and the goal is to free all the slaves and as he says in that letter this reflects my position as president. my personal goal is that all men everywhere can be free. okay. so that's what this war is about. but the war is of course also a civil war a conflict between neighbors, a between people who knew each other before the war. lincoln was actually kind of friendly with alex stevens when they served together for one term in congress. so this is the classic civil war and civil wars are often far more brutal than conventional wars, although not always, obviously. there's nothing more than the than german war in 1939 to 1945. and that is not a civil war. what is going on with czar putin is not a civil war. it is an attack on another country. and

as if it is the imperial power and the united states is the colony, somehow the united states is in a subordinate position, supplying 85, i saw some literature saying that the bombs that hit where nasan hazralla was, that complex, that huge complex were between 2004 pounds, these weapons are unusual, 85 of these... into that uh structure, i don't see anything like that happening in tel aviv, i don't see any, mass murder of civilians taking place in tel aviv, so that's what i mean, there's still seems to be foot on the break, incrementalism that is doesn't correspond to how israel is acting, israel is behaving, israel and the united states together are behaving, so... it it's uh in a sense more of the same, but the anti keeps being raised, the stakes keep being raised, as i saw that display of uh all that technology over tel aviv, uh earlier today, i thought this is major transformation in the state of the world right now, there are going there is going to be uh very dramatic response. from uh us israel that uh that partnership, that partnership. okay, let's cross over now to m

, japan and korea and an expert on north korea and has worked for many years with the united states to enhance our capabilities to address pyongyang's increasing provocations. ambassador cho most recent a working with the president on his pivotal state initiative and maybe we'll hear about that and it's a great privilege to welcome him this morning. thank you so much, ambassador. [applause] >> well, good morning, everyone. thank you nadia, for your kind interaction. i first thank you to hudson institute for hosting tonight's forum. i'm so delighted to join you and pleased that leading korean companies are represented here today as well, along with many of friends. to me, this week is truly a week of defense industry. on tuesday i had the pleasure of visiting a u.s. annual 2024 meeting and annual expedition to see the exciting ways more technology is deployed to advanced military employment. the korean parallel in particular a display of fascinating product produced by korean defense industry. as our global economic partnership continues to flourish, the companies here today have pla

what should the united states do? or they have to say: well, you know, well, it's not the same thing, well, then it's the bankruptcy of this whole idea, because what we announced, you're with us, you're in nato, we invited you, but you'll still be fired upon , or the united states said, well , listen, you russians don't respect us, we said that this is all, this is nato territory, we are protecting these three, the protocol process of ratification is just going on, where have you gone, we are destroying ours. rockets from the territory there, i do not i know poland or germany, your launchers, ladies, well, great, they will destroy, but what will happen the next day, and there are guarantees that vladimir putin will not hit romstein there, say, with his missiles, but we know that for sure, who is it guarantees, who is the person who will say, you can hit russia, and she will not respond, that is the problem with all this, that is, i precisely adhere to this point of view, that if ukraine receives a security guarantee o

does not care. at all about international law, the united states only cares about its colony, israel, and on that note, i appreciate both of you uh being with me khalid barakat out of beirout, arnold august, out of montreal. my pleasure, thank you viewers for staying with us on another spotlight. i'm marza hashim, hope to see you right here next time. goodbye. headlines and press tv: one year on, since the israely holocous in gaza, more palestinians including children are killed in the gaza strip. israeli occupation force continues air raids sent a ground invasion against lebanon killing more civilians. german police clash with anti-israel ralliers while protester held around the world in solidarity with

my friend patty his life in the united states began through criminal acts, legal entry into the united states. all other criminal actions into the united states but without that moment, she never would've entered the lives of almost two decades of work of new york city high school students. not only do i embrace people like patty with all of their complexities in all theiri contradictions, i celebrateem them. i celebrate those criminals and that is why i wrote this book thank you. [applause] i am happy to take any questions anyone has. yes? >> you mentioned in your book, even though. [inaudible] small country compared to the united states. what do you think the united states can learn? the impact he has? >> i think the legacy policies is something we are going to have to be as they evolve for the next few years. certainly there is much to be said about reducing the level of criminalityla established in communities. the only possible way of doing that is not through mass incarceration. through locking up people whose ties to criminal activity and to gang activity. certainly some of anti

what does this put the position of the united states in? it would make it appear that first, that the communist venezuela, which they do not, because they are a very small minority. and second, it would make it appear that a representative of the united states was being blackmailed, that he was afraid go and to face up to these demonstrators. and i can only say that as far as our foreign policy is concerned, it seemed to me that it was essential that we not show a picture to the world of a representative of the united states, in effect, putting his tail between, his legs and running whenever the communists happened to make a threat of this type. and may i say to in that connection, i think the developments since have proved that it was right to go. right to go, because by going the communists overplayed their hands. and all over latin america. some government leaders who previously didn't believe that the communists were a real danger or that they would resort to violence, now have changed their views. and also, i think that it was a plus f

the united states controls 18% of it. to be the manufacturing power of the entire world and going to get back to donald trump's leadership. last year for the first time in a very long time, america became a net importer of our food. you know what that means? we import more food than we grow for our own people. we don't make, we don't even grow the food necessary for our own people. that is the pathway on reliance on the worst people of the world. i want people to be reliant on our own citizens. we'll do, do one more question. >> i work with wwj news in detroit. how will you hold the c.e.o.'s and help those people that are laid off? >> they do business in america. they have to follow american rules and laws and respect american workers and we are going to fight to make that happen. i think it is a very simple and want to make sure that corporations that are operating in this country actually obey our laws and one of the reasons that chinese firms are able to undercut american workers, look, clean air and clean water, if a

and zinanism has been fostering over the last few decades that israel is invincible, united states, israel together, they are invincible, nothing could touch us, they the palestinian people showed on that day with great heroism that this is false, and since then the zionism has never really recovered, they have not one year later they have not been able to defeat hamas and they admit that all right, stay with me arnold. well khalet, i mean did you expect this level of relentless atrocities to take place by the israeli regime after the october the 7th operation? i don't think uh anyone did, because uh, as much as we have witnessed israeli crimes since 1948 and even before that, in the 30s, you know, zionist militias have carried many massiker. against our people in palestine and in the arab world, i mean, you know, but to this level, no, because i think that without a full us and western support to israel, i don't think you know that could have been possible, this is a us genocide, this is the united states war crimes against the palestinian people, and it's israel is backed up by t

supplying the israeli regime with all types of weapons, with finance, with intelligent, and if united state have send all their battleship toward occupied palestine to help the zionist state in continue its war against gazza and as well against lebanon now and if the united state and those country did not support the scientis state with any uh weapons, i believe that hamas could have actually at this point defeated uh the... the resist state army they could actually at this point have liberated many areas in palestine and this show you the weakness of the so-called israeli regime and it shows as well that thanks to that support from the us the israeli regime will not exist and i believe that if the israeli regime will try to conduct any attack against iran i believe that iran as they say and as they warn they will conduct a major attack against the giant state of israel uh uh inside uh occupied the palestine, but i think that the iranian should as well send a clear warning to all neighboring countries, especially like jordan, saudi arabia and other countries in the bergian gulf that if they

add, reuters reports, republicans are preparing to appeal. the results of the elections in the united statesular in those states where in those shaky so-called states, and even today, by the way, the current president of the united states of america, joe biden, said that he is afraid of what will happen after the election, actually , we are talking about possible provocations, most likely from the same donald trump. here, mr. vitaly, is the debate from. candidates for vice presidents, the general concept of how the election campaign is going now, if we are talking about it, is it is somehow changing the electoral paradigm now, are we still in those 50/50 percentages, when no one knows and no one can predict who will be the next president, i think that no one knows, no one can predict, who will be next... precisely because you do not know what the electoral college will be like, and precisely because sociology speaks of the authority of the candidate among the entire population exclusively there, in the ugly states there, in principle, sociology is still on the margin of statistical error, in

the united states and the west, to destroy russia as the main revisionist, while it exists, russia, there will be no world order under the rule of the west, this is what he explains, and he explains it in such a way that everyone understands what follows from this, this is what follows from this, that we have years ahead, decades, decades, 10 years, i don’t know, i can’t measure. here, but no, so to speak, alternative, to clarifying relations with the americans, fundamental in the same pledge we don't have it, we won't be able to find it, in general the essence of the historical moment is, forgive me for the tautology, conscious that it is incredibly historical, because history is generally a space of duty, you... can do what and must do what you must do in history, if you refuse this, you disappear , your destiny disappears , your purpose disappears, you disappear as a people, as a civilization, as a state, note that everything that is played out, is played out in this modality, america must do this to do, but she wants to rule the world, she likes it, she robs everyone, this is the main

, believe that the key is the protection of the us coast itself, and that the interests of the united statesnot actively spread beyond the us territory. that is, the emphasis is on strengthening one's own security and on avoiding any open confrontations with other states, it is very difficult to somehow reconcile these differences, so it is quite likely that volze's speech, his foreign policy statements and jaydy vance's statements convinced their own voters, voters republican party, democratic, but here it is also important to note that it is unlikely to be a key issue of the election, since more important issues such as the economy, immigration, they are still at the top of the main priorities of american voters now, tim waltz, he was such, he was called, such a folkloric character, he is such, well, from the common people, he is liked by the average american, so to speak, but... jaydee vance, he is a good speaker, he showed himself well as a speaker and proved that he is good at speaking. still, what do the polls say, who won this debate, was it a tie, or is anyone as victorious as the po

and zionism has been fostering over the last few decades. that israel is invincible, united states, israel together, they are invincible, nothing to touch us, they the palestinian people showed on that day with great heroism that this is false, and since then the zinanism has never really recovered, they have not one year later they have not been able to defeat hamas and they admit that, all right, stay with me, arnold, well, did you expect this level of rela atrocities to take place by the israeli regime after the october the 7th operation? i don't think uh anyone did, because as much as we have witnessed israeli crimes since 1948 and even before that, in the 30s, you know, zionist militias have carried many massackers against our people in palestine and in the arab world. i mean, but to this level uh, no, because i think that without a full us and western support to israel, i don't think uh, you know, that could have been possible. "this is a us genocide, this is the united states war crimes against the palestinian people, and it's israel is backed up by this full military, finan

and potentially others, and yet the united states does not know about it. because this is whaters that have been dropped are us supplied, the us wouldn't israel wouldn't use american weapons with such massive weight and and strategic value without letting the americans know first, the second is that we know and october 7 have proved this, in fact the... whole last year have proved that israeli intelligence in many ways is extremely faulty and is incapable of handling many of the simplest tasks. until now israel continues to behave in gaza, looking at this empty space, they have no idea what they are doing for a whole year. now why would we believe that suddenly all of this string of assassinations, including that of of sheikh himself were done without any american involvement? "this is the work of top western intelligences, satellite information, all sorts of of spying software and hardware that have been provided by someone else, the israelis are simply incapable of doing so. now on their own. now that takes me back to your original question, is this theatrix? of course it's t

sworn an oath to uphold the constitution six times in my career, including as vice president, as a united statesks and as the top law enforcement officer of the largest state in our country. responsible for upholding and enforcing the laws of the state and the laws of the united states was the work i did. and i have never waivered in upholding that oath, and i have always executed it faithfully and without reservation. [ applause ] and therein lies the profound difference between donald trump and me. he, who violated the oath to uphold the constitution of the united states of america, and make no mistake, he, who if given the chance, would violate it again. donald trump lost the 2020 election. and as you have heard and know, he refused to accept the will of the people and the results of an election that was free and fair. as you have heard, he sent an armed mob to the united states capitol where they assaulted law enforcement officers. he threatened the life of his own vice president and refused . he threatened the life of his own vice president and refused to engage in the peaceful transfer of

attracting enough talent. >> if you faced obstacles overall in opening of up factories in the united states, how are you balancing a sense of, is it easy? are states making it easy? is the federal government making it easy, the dod? has there been a change? >> there are still significant barriers, so, in the case in the united states and i work in the vehicles business unit, that's what i'm most familiar with, in order to do classified work for the u.s. government, of course, we had to become mitigated. it's not impossible, but it's challenging. >> can you explain that for a minute, just what the acronym means. >> stands for fortune ownership and controlling interest, so to oversimplify, it's essentially a firewall between my company and the united states, american rheinmetall. my boss who runs it does not report to germany, he reports to the director. there are two employees, one is a german, one from the united kingdom and outside who are not employees, who are u.s. citizens has to outnumber the inside directors so they can vote down anything that's not in the united states national inter

strategy and the plan deserve attention, and he supports the position of the representative of the united states organization of the united nations. victory plan, roman petrovich, yes, i think it will be worth it. to begin our analysis, we understand that this is an extremely ambitious request from ukraine, we will hope that the united states will agree to all points of this plan, but, as the classics said, option b is also possible. well, with the caveat that some moments may not be covered from the side of the united states. we would like to believe that everything will be smooth, but we understand that real politics, unfortunately, sometimes gives very unpleasant results. decision, in this situation the most interesting thing is that neither the official discussion of this document in the united states of america is already underway, nor the writing of it in kyiv, so that at least some conceptual drafts of this document would be seen in ukraine or made public . why do analysts today use the fact that... they are from the interview of president zelenskyi or from from the american or european p

who is the president and vice president of the united states? if kamala harris believes these policies are going to make american citizens more prosperous, she is welcome to try them right now. what i can't get over is a person who runs on promising to do something. she has got a job right now. she ought to do it. if her ideas were so good they would help american citizens now. it is telling that instead of implementing these policies she just talks about them. because that is what people in washington do. career bureaucrats and politicians who talk about doing things. donald trump actually got stuff done, and that is why we have to put him back in the white house. let's do one more question and then i want to leave you all with one final thought about voter turnout. >> thank you so much for this question. as we know, alcoholism and/or addiction does not discriminate based on race, education, socioeconomic status, gender, or anything else. clark county has seen an increase in fentanyl fatalities. approximately 297% increase in the last couple of

is willing, the united states government is willing to let their cities crumble, let crime and and homelessness and so on run rampant, let the drug problem throughout the united states go unchecked and use the money that could be going to help people the united states to send other countries so that they will excuse israel's war crimes, we won't see a change, but these these are policies that must change and it's going to take other countries to to do it, the united states isn't going to do it, other countries must pressure the united states and pressure israel to to end this this aggression, this genocide and this constant destabilization throughout the... east right uh now let's switch back to mariam do you think that israel is trying escalate to to level that it will lead to much bigger war what is the end game of the israeli side here well it's as we've had always in the past they want to get everything uh for to get lot of gains when it comes to the politics and to having hebigemy over the countries and the surrounding to perhaps take also expand their their power a lot of

state of israel is inherently n. t jewish. a claim he made once again at the united nations general assembly. last month, the sooner we got out of the one and only joined states continues to be a moral stain on the united nations. it has made this once respected institution, contemptible in the eyes of decent people everywhere. but so many palestinians reject signing them as the drive of saint la colonialism that dispossessed them of the lands during the founding of israel, but knocked about or catastrophe in 1948. so esign us to military forces violently driving around $750000.00 palestinians from the homes. but many jews have also spoken out against signing some ultra orthodox groups have regularly protested against the state of israel and its ongoing occupation of palestinian lands. in spite of the debates of these being a sleep rise in both anti semitism and as i'm a phobia wills wide since october the 7th last year recorded. and he's the music incidents in the united states increased 388 percent in the 4 weeks after october 7th. well, the number of is on the phone to can students increase

of america and for the elections in the united states. is happening now is conditionally in a triangle. iran, israel and lebanon. who benefits more? trump? is it harry? well, rather to trump. it's hard to say, you understand, on the one hand, it benefits trump, who blames democracy, they are determined. on the other hand, the democratic electorate, there are a lot of people, who believe that israel is using excessive force and they may believe that if they vote. for the democrats, the united states will continue this policy, and if trump becomes president, well, israel will generally feel much more confident in the middle east, that is, both parties are playing their electorate, on the other hand, biden and harris, they support israel in the destruction shit, and thus do not forget about that electorate that sympathizes with israel in their own party, they just have to. well, how to say it, to maneuver, trump does not need to maneuver, and his supporters say that biden wants to contain israel, and israel is actually on the verge of a new

the student said, what is a job of a united states senator? part of it is voting in washington for votes that are important to the state of wyoming. also protecting and promoting wyoming. our jobs, economy, environment, people, special places, resources, and values. there are people in washington who do not understand wyoming and are a threat to the future of our state. those are the people i am fighting every day on behalf of the people of wyoming. i want to continue that fight and i ask for your vote. >> two minutes for an opening statement. mr. morrow: i'm grateful that you showed up. you didn't have to. you are the incumbent. the incumbent for the house did not show up because she didn't have to. thank you. i also want to thank mr. peck who has been communicating with me so i knew what was going on, which is helpful when you're going to a debate. i want to thank all of these people who took the time out of their busy days to come and listen to john and i debate the issues. and i hope we debate them. i would like to tell you something about

and now it's become normal in the united states.oes it bother me that the country is walking on very thin ice? i think it's a little weird. if you sat down with zelensky and putin, what do you think you could talk to them about? you did something very funny during your debates in the primaries, when you accused the other candidates of not knowing the name of a single region where they wanted to send money and troops, which would lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people, they don't even know the names of the regions of ukraine, it was great. much more than they expected, and actually russia had promised that nato would not expand. this is a pretty uncomfortable fact for some people in america, but in the early nineties, james baker promised mikhail gorbachev, he said nato would not go an inch further than east germany. well, nato has expanded much more since the fall of the ussr than it did when the ussr existed. i think if we can make a decent deal that gives russia the guarantees in what they see as nato expansion in v

no comments from the point of view of inclusion in the internal affairs of the united states from.ere were no republicans, they like it when they say that trump should be president. the president of ukraine did not say a single word that he was advocating for democracy. he came to this plant in pennsylvania in order to actually thank the american people, the bipartisan support of ukraine, as well as president biden, who, by and large , is in charge of this strategy of supporting ukraine. and there is nothing wrong here, it is definitely not... is interference in internal affairs, by the way, it is very interesting that mike johnson demanded the president of ukraine to release the ambassador of ukraine to the united states, but during the negotiations themselves and after that public part, i didn't hear from trump to say that this was interference, and mr. president, i'm waiting for you to fire this person who advised you, i'm not talking about how all this it was organized, and definitely the minister. of foreign affairs and our embassy in washington worked to ensure that the meeti

america's too many missiles hit the ground simultaneously for anybody to believe the notion that the united states and israel um you had effective defense so what i saw states is are united states defenses on the ground in israel or did they all come from naval ships ships in the mediterranean? no, i believe that the united states has both, we we have the ships which provide the the bulk of it in terms of the numbers, but we've also deployed one and maybe two thad batteries. that are um a more advanced um uh intercept capability than the uh patriot. we also may have some patriot batteries on the ground, especially since we put american troops on the ground, we'll be protecting them with american uh assets. we would never allow american troops to be deployed and only have israeli. assets on them, we we provide our own forest protection, so you we have ground base interceptors in israel uh as well as the sea-based interceptors. is netanyahu afraid, is he scared? it's hard for me to get in, i know he's fearful of his political future. um, he's somebody who's been saying he wants to have this decisive

what is the comparison with the united states? united states, the g d. p is last see about 2425 trillion. so you understand russia is to trillion the united states 2425 trillion no contest. no one should ever imagine that even the soviet union and the patch or russian now is some kind of economic competitor of the united states never was, isn't now, only the height of the cold war would make one think like that. and that's it. something you should correct if you've never had it explained to you. now let's move to try and what's the g d p last year of china? again, the debates about how you accounted but order of magnitude, $1718.00, trillion dollars way more important that russia, but still not the size of the united states. or although it's catching up. and most people believe at current rate, so they can amik road. china will surpass the united states by the end of this decade, and it has been catching up, let's remember, 50 years ago, which in historical time is a moment. 50 years ago china was among the poorest countries on earth. and now it is the o

and we buy more injuries to the migrants who are getting into coming to the united states. but sometimes we find more deaths but what we don't buy is we don't buy our way out of people wanting to make a new life in the states. so when you're listening politicians you know ask yourself are we more of the same? and then demanding that they don't do that anymore, they don't have good ideas, then they might not be the person for for for the position. and if the best ideas are just a rehashed, revamped of the old thing. only on steroids. then, then that's that's the sign of a politician who doesn't know a whole lot about the way migration works and is wedded into a fantasy version of migration or somebody who is whose imagination is too poor to want them leading a city or. all right. or, god forbid, a country. well, if the governor are really serious, how many corporate actions pay fines are going to jail for hiring undocumented people? right. almost there. a employer sanctions have been part of immigration laws in 1986 and reagan was president. they signed the immigration reform

in following the returns, all eyes are on the map of the united states. ach one of the 50 states has a certain number of electoral votes according to the size of its population. pennsylvania has 32 electoral votes. new york, 45. other key states are california, ohio, texas and illinois. in illinois, the voting will be so close that the lead will go back and forth from one candidate to the other. but then this turns into a seesaw battle in quite a few of the states all night long. and depending on. it all night long, the figures building up. in state after state, millions of voters split their ballots, backing one presidential nominee and then voting for candidates from the opposing party for senator, governor or congressman. senator kennedy, early lead of 2 million votes dwindles perilously as the returns come in from the western states, but he holds on to his in electoral votes. the returns are checked by his press secretary, pierre salinger. at the press headquarters of the democratic presidential candidate in hyannis port, massachusetts. all eyes are on

over what are the united states and china competing? are they competing toward to common set of rules, over who gets to set the rules for the other to follow? are they competing in a contest for power in which rule following is not even important? what is the end state that the united states wants to achieve for the bilateral relationship, et cetera. and the biden administration has found itself trying to answer some of these questions in the domestic political sphere, so i tend to think that we might go in one direction or the other. so what are those directions? well, one alternative, which is certainly not engagement approach, would be in a valid cold war kind of approach in which the united states would say what beijing often alleges, that the united states is seeking the containment of chinese power and influence in the world. and that might sound appealing from the cold war and that's one of the reasons that has conceptual roots for americans, although, we should not forgot that during the cold war, containment was actually quite

the united states is moving military forces to the middle east to contain iran. the pentagon plans to increase the number of f-15e, f-16 and a10 combat aircraft. increasing the number of fighters is of great importance, as they play an important role in the destruction of iranian drones. well, perhaps the americans are not unfoundedly worried. the united states in iraq, here, of course, vladimir vladimirovich, a question arises, we heard matthew miller's statement and biden's statement, everything is very convoluted, very ambiguous. what plans might the united states have in the middle east, or are they still trying to figure things out themselves, because netanyahu has gotten out of control. under control, you see, they say, as if we are consulting, conducting consultations, but these consultations are aimed at reaching some kind of diplomatic agreement, and biden in this regard, i think, is not even being disingenuous, it's just he doesn't finish the sentence: until the elections in the united states of america, then let the grass not grow, then you can do what

allies and partners be of concern to the united states? can the biden-harrison ministration -- administration preserve the free and open? >> >> the biden administration has been successfully allies and technology controls. there is concern among allies about the most aggressive controls and trying to get allies on board with that. what is your message to u.s. allies when it comes to aggressive controls to try to get them on board? >> i am not sure what you're referring to by most aggressive controls. this is a give-and-take. it is extended dialogue we have had with a widening group of allies and partners who claim the highest and dual use technology supply chain with national security applications and we take this in steps. we diagnose the threat. we look at what the trade-offs are in imposing a certain control to deal with the threat and we walked through the four questions i laid out in my remarks. that has been a constructive set of dialogues allies and partners. does it mean we agree on everything? not necessarily. are we aligned on me

i'm upgrading to the united states for the past 2 years. a lot of folks has been coming today and i'd state from 80. i came from the mediterranean federal program, otherwise known as the biden program. and so they have been migrating the lead to the 9 states being a lot of chaos as well as instability that has played the country since the assassination of show to them or use. and with games, you know, making it a safe for folks to be in haiti, more than that. hundreds of thousands of boats have left the country in search of a better life in the united states. and i think it's important for us to conceptualize that in the met. right. because says all of this has been happening in the united states. patients are continuing to be reported. all folks are not getting the care that is needed or given the support that is needed to do then um, what's currently happening in the country. and as these folks are migrating right legally to the writing program and other pathways, right. i think it's really important that we embrace these folks in our comm

look at the economic impact of immigrants, immigrants are often times saving the economy in the united states. and there's a new report out um by a non partisan entity that's looking at the next decade. and they've stated that they believe that due to increased integration, arrogance will continue to contribute over 7 trillion dollars um and boosting the economy of the united states over the next decade. i also think if you look at the social security and unemployment programs, those individuals who are not us citizens pay into in working in the united states, but also the benefit of so for instance, if you're a haitian immigrant on temper of trade status, you may be entrepreneur success rate for years pain into social security programs that you'll never be able to take advantage of unless you become a citizen. and as the previous speaker side right now, there's not actually a pathway for citizenship, for so many individuals coming into the united states. what obtain temperature the status of your here on the manager info. so these patients have been around for multiple decades. and individua

information program. >> i could sum them up by saying it is our purpose to make the united states policy everywhere intelligible and wherever possible to explain not only what we do that why we do it into attempt to demonstrate for all the mass media that we have which other free men may choose not to brief capsule very good summary are we winning the world propaganda. >> i don't think anyone can say who is winning i think it's true to say that good policy makes good propaganda we stand not first but fourth we are behind russia, china and the united arab republic. in certain areas we are in the vernacular outgunned the communist countries will produce more books in translation the foreign countries in a given year then were we. makertain areas we progress and others we lose a little ground what we do and what were able to do is to a large extent determine what actually happens in this country, for example developments in alabama in the old days when i would work for the government i would've thought the picture the brooding bus would've been centered and a photographer had to be v

united states, kazakhstan., having balanced the energy system, china is opening up opportunities for mining in individual provinces and is beginning to increase its presence in this industry at a very significant pace, to regain its lost positions. at the same time, it makes sense to say that china has never lost them. fully retaining its leadership in the development and supply of equipment, which we still have to - let's say, catch up with, and therefore china certainly remains a significant player at the global level, a large number of chinese equipment, chinese industry participants are located in other countries, and china is now returning to itself - energy, this is a surplus of associated petroleum gas, we have now launched several projects to use associated petroleum gas to generate electricity and carry out mining activities, so russia. russia's strengths are a competent personnel base, a powerful energy industry, a surplus of the same associated, associated petroleum gas, our climate, this attracts in

but, but, but, but by lowering in the united states or europe, israel is put in the united states in that position of those bases. there's some 35 of them in the region now where they are is very, very intriguing. many of them are located in saudi arabia, jordan, and the surrounding areas principally among the air countries. so this, any, any attack on those facilities then brings in a whole race, is this up to a whole nother level of, of getting involved involved such as a jordan and, and saudi arabia and, and supposedly a reason. and recently, saudi arabia and iran had re established diplomatic relations after many years. now, some of these countries, i mean, like a whole month to wait. uh, they may, they may have demanded that any ex tech activity by the united states in the region against iran will not be there. their country will not be used to facilitate that. and, and that did happen the last time that iran launched missiles. i think it was a mon wait and a few other countries said don't you dare shoot this remark. sentries. uh uh, yeah, so otherwise you're out. and i think th