>> like you said, he is the walter cronkite of spanish america. glish-speaking americans do not have a lot to cronkite. the days of david brinkley and walter cronkite are gone. there is not one anchor who we all watch and listen to. in the spanish-speaking world, the spanish speaking america, it is different. he sees himself, jorge rommel's, as an anchor -- jorge ramos, as an anchorman but advocate to speak's the truth and takes on certain causes. immigration he says is a big deal for everybody, he says. he is a mexican immigrant himself, and he says when trump talks about deporting 11 million immigrants, he is like, we know those people. this is not an abstraction. consequently, some people say therefore, if that is your position, you should not be objective when it comes to covering republicans or trump. he has been tough on democrats about immigration, too, but in any case, it is not something you see in the ordinary american broadcast network for americans news departments. maybe for msnbc and fox but these guys are influencing the hispanic com

now walter cronkite's question for senator kennedy. mr. cronkite: senator, the charge has been made frequently that the united states for many years has been on the defensive around the world, that our policy has been one of reaction to the soviet union rather than positive action on our own. what areas do you see where the united states might take the offensive in a challenge to communism over the next four to eight years? mr. kennedy: one of the areas, and of course the most vulnerable area is i have felt, has been eastern europe. i've been critical of the administration's failure to suggest policies which would make it possible for us to establish, for example, closer relations with poland, particularly after the 55-56 period and the hungarian revolution. we indicated at that time that we were not going to intervene militarily. but there was a period there when poland demonstrated a national independence and even the polish government moved some distance away from the soviet union. i suggested that we amend our legislation so that we cou

walter cronkite school at a.s.u. in downtown phoenix, and it was broadcast here in the valley. it was a wide ranging debate focusing on a number of topic, senator mccain seeking his sixth term as the senior senator in arizona, and his challenger ann kirkpatrick, who has been through a number of hotly contested races herself. they talked about immigration, voicing their opinions about the minimum kirkpatrick supports, john mccain does not, but the most harsh language for ann kirkpatrick's support of hillary clinton and john mccain's once support of donald trump and now his nonsupport of donald trump. take a listen. >> when mr. trump attacks the women and demeans the women in our nation and in our society, that is a point where i just have to part company. it's not pleasant for me to renounce the nominee of my party. has been supporting donald trump. over 60 times has endorsed him. so it wasn't enough when trump insulted the khan family, a gold star family, who called on john mccain to renounce trump. it wasn't enough when trump made fun of a disabled reporter. >> and the moderat

walter cronkite trained himself to talk 125 words a minute, so if you double timed that -- [inaudible] >> [inaudible] [inaudible conversations] >> and matt helped me come up with the title and gets credit in the book for it. [inaudible conversations] >> do you want a selfie, or do you want someone to take it? it was a graphic novel. and my 9-year-old came to the event, and he wasn't so interested -- [inaudible] no offense, but he read the entire graphic novel. >> oh, that's incredible. >> so i took a picture of him and tweeted it out -- [inaudible] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] >> my son would not have picked up "clinton cash." [inaudible] i mean, he's only 9. >> what did he think of what he was reading? [inaudible conversations] [laughter] >> i saw some great folks out here. >> [inaudible] >> thank you. >> it's so good. >> oh, thank you. >> okay. how does the disaster of this election line up compared to other disasters? what do you think? >> that's -- [inaudible] nice to see you. good to see you, love your stuff. look, a disaster in terms of the presidential di

the debate happened here at the walter cronkite school in the arizona pbs studios and it lasted an hour. the candidates focus on a number of issues, but as you mentioned, john mccain's support and now nonsupport of donald trump was a major topic at tonight's debate. term in the u.s. senate. he made it through a hotly contested primary and is now up against ann kirkpatrick, who has been a congresswoman in arizona for a number of terms, and she too has gone through some pretty intense races in her political career. this was their first and only debate. they talked about immigration. they both voiced their support and opposition for raising minimum wage, but the sharpest attacks came when they started talking about donald trump and over the weekend and that tape came out. ann kirkpatrick pounced on that. here's a little sample of what happened tonight. >> when mr. trump attacks women and demeans the women in our nation and in our society, that is a point where i just have to part company. it's not pleasant for me to renounce the nominee of my party. >> for over a year, john mccain trump, o

i sound like a dinosaur but i grew up with walter cronkite and the 6:30 news.ny less options for finding information. we had newspapers and the evening news and we had conversations and talked in our communities. it was much more civilized. i don't think we are learning anything more by it being two years than if it were eight months. john: of all the songs you ever been sung, which one applies most to this election? sheryl: god bless this mess. go to change.org/make it short. mark: and you would like it real short. sheryl: i would like for it to be four days. i wanted to be fair -- listen. we know our candidates issues and experience. do we need to drag it out this long? john: god bless this mess, 2016. we will be right back. ♪ mark: head over to bloomberg politics.com for an internet look inside trump tower courtesy of our friends at bloomberg businessweek. we have our piece on bill bradley's super pac. coming up on the television, emily chang has complete coverage of apple's earnings. john and i will be back tomorrow, same bat time, same bat channel. see the

i had conversations with walter cronkite, dubbed the most trusted man in america. we discussed what was happening in the news media, the bias. and some of it is due to the 24-hour news cycle. unfortunately it does not give nbc a license to act like a political operative and release this tape with donald trump and billy bush. but the great thing is trump apologized for it. he did dominate the news cycle. but his strongest most memorable line was when he said he would appoint a special prosecutor to go after hillary clinton and her illegal use of the server. if you are wondering temporarily, i think he will be the ultimate comeback kid. reporter: to that point we learned there is a report out that nbc was trying to sanitize that billy bush statement and take him out. we are used to it. the manufactured so-called october surprises. then the preannouncements like the "time" magazine cover. do you think they are not trying to report news, but make news? , they are trying to put their fingers on the scale for their person. >> absolutely. last summer they thought donald t

thankfully media expert at walter cronkite school did some digging into a headline that says hillary clinton said christians in america must abandon their faith, but that site admits it doesn't guarantee its stories are reliable or accurate. the story about president obama banning the pledge of allegiance. that got shared a whole lot. one about donald trump paying sarah palin $10 million for her endorsement, but it just doesn't stop people from reading, believing and further bolstering their own political mindsets. >> there's kind of a plague of misinformation, fake news. the more you want to believe in something that sounds outrageous to you, the more you should be skeptical. >> gilmore suggests researching the outlet posting any story as well as researching what's in it. sites that have an agenda are not necessarily bad, but they should make sure their reporting is actually accurate. some sites even have disclaimers on them that say they don't make any claim what they post is accurate. another easy way to determine legitimacy, google the author. >> yeah. and sometimes if you just r

i'm walter cronkite. good night. and that pioneer of television news broadcasting.. murrow like? >> some times, he'll come in. i could tell from the look on his face that something is going on. and -- i don't say anything. give him a chance to work it out. >> i see. >> makeup may impact the superficial. but impact is deep. richard nixon's biggest mistake after watergate, probably his decision not to wear makeup in his presidential debate with john f. kennedy. a decision which made him look a decision which made him look sweaty and nervous. >> makeup shows up in history books when it comes to the 1960 election? >> yes. >> you made up richard nixon when? >> after he left office. i made him up twice. very gracious. certainly took makeup. >> this time. i am accepting makeup. >> absolutely. >> reporter: florence ricabono began working in tv around when tv began. an art school graduate. aspiring actress, ricki, got the nickname in college, got her start doing makeup on sid caesar's your show of shows. and, the milton berle show. >> ha-ha-ha. >> reporter: in a show like th

they gave $2 million to the walter cronkite school of winning a lawsuit. that donation has been returned. >>> a rescue effort for a horse stuck in a canal today, the 23-year-old horse named mister fell into the canal outside his stable near 129th avenue and southern. >> hard to look at, poor guy. >> ?his backlegswerestuck inside of that canal tube. but luckily, there were fire crews, neighbors, a team effort, to get the horse out of there. >> all of the neighbors grabbed toe straps, any other strap they could get, maneuvered them around the horse, another neighbor came with a forklift and lifted him up out of the canal. >> it looked awful. >> yeah, hard to watch. >> thankfully the horse is okay, which is amazing, isn't it? >> probably shaken up by this, but they tranquilized him and calmed h him. but he is okay. >>> skyfox over the scene of a deadly atv crash by lake pleasant road. investigatos believe that the rider was driving along the edge of the canal and somehow the atv fell into the canal. they don't believe impairment was a factor here. >>> a valle

he goes back to 1964 when he shared the debate duties with walter cronkite in california. it's interesting the parallels between '64 and today. that was the gold water versus nelson rock afeller primary. the insurgent versus the system. in a lot of ways, we'll see it tonight. >> we've seen how important a moderator is. they pick the questions and control the flow. >> anything can happen. people are looking forward to trump, hillary, the debacle in the desert. nobody knows what can happen. there are so many things from e-mails to tapes, and it's going to be more on chris than any moderator we've seen to keep things on track. i think lots of things can derail it. tonight is pivotable. it's the last chance we get to see these two in their full valor trying to make their case. >> he needs to have fun tonight. the question is is he going to wear a cowboy hat like you, chuck. let's pull up the topics chris wallace chose. i think that will set the tone as people are watching. one of them is fitness. another one is world affairs. the economy, of course. how important are these top

and it's not often you see journalist who actually knew walter cronkite -- another tweet, you look incredible. my 8-year-old said you look around 50. it's true. thanks for that, leanne, but it seems not all viewers like this segment. appreciate your reporting but please stop reading mean tweets. it's poor manners to bring attention to yourself. and another, mean tweets is beneath you, but please use this one on the show. and my favorite, you are so calm and cool as you deliver the news. i bet you're not wearing any pants, are you? well, yes, i am. please keep the feedback coming. tweet me @brit hume. that's about it for tonight. "the o'reilly factor's" up next, and bill has the first one on one interview since the tapes with donald trump himself. and we leave you with p.j. o'rourke who wrote the democrats are the party of activism. republicans are the party that says government work and then get elected and prove it. by the way, if you used to dvr this program at 7:00 p.m., your dvr may have vanished, so be sure to reset it. o'reilly is straight ahead. >>> welcome to "red eye." hello, everyon

when you used to tune in for walter cronkite and the like. called "trump tv."ampaign manager, kellyanne conway. means er s erin burnett can't laughing but 46,000 or so watching. on facebook live ashes good number. what is this here? rallying? keeping morale up because reporters hearing you're losing? a link to raise money. is it about fund-raising or as cynics say, testing out the postelection trump media empire when he again today in a radio interview flatly denied any interest in? >> i think it's about going around the filter. and he's been successful at that. that certainly, you know, that was the whole success he had on twitter. for better or worse, going around the filter. he's just pushing it into the next frontier. >> well, george bush called it the filter, too. the way he got around it, going to the local press. i think this is taking it to a new level, and if you look at who his main advisors are, they're essentially media executives. steve bannon, roger ailes, informal adviser and if these poll numbers hold and donald trump loses he's not going to rid

and i miss the days when the ted koppel's and the walter cronkite's who are individuals in the barbara walters, whether you want to call them or the bernard shaw's, these were men and women who, by the way could argue and discuss both sides of the issue. i miss the old tv show that they used to have, counterpoint -- i really do miss that. >> what is it better? my debating justice breyer's as i did for two hours in my studio or you interviewing two smart lawyers? >> i would hope that i when interview to dumb lawyers but only two small boys. >> why would you change lawyers? i would want to interview you and justice breyer. >> that's what i would. >> were better served with the posing art. >> but again, how about justice breyer and clarence thomas in the same studio. >> and then that means that you and i, or whoever's doing it, we have to be able to address both sides. i'm just saying that's one of the things. i would add one other thing and that is, this argument of what is going to happen after the election, if the election, if you listen to donald trump, he says what is going to happen

. >> reporter: among the other titans -- >> i'm morely safer, walter cronkite, good night. >> that pioneerwhat was edward r. murrow like? >> he was very busy, smoking. working and writing and not sociable to me. >> reporter: after almost 65 years, yes, 65 years at work, ricki johnson is a master at reading the room. >> most of the time we talk. we, we talk about, you know, what movie did you see? or, have you been to the theater? or how is the family? so we do chat. sometimes charlie will come in. i can tell from the look on his face that something is going on. and -- i don't say anything. give him a chance to work it out. >> i see. >> reporter: makeup may in fact be superficial. but its impact is deep. richard nixon's biggest mistake after watergate, probably his decision not to wear makeup in his presidential debate with john f. kennedy. a decision which made him look sweaty and nervous. >> makeup shows up in history books when it comes to the 1960 election? >> yes. >> you made up richard nixon when? >> after he left office. i made him up twice. very gracious. certainly took makeup. >> t

when fire hoses and police sled were loosened on civil rights demonstrators, walter cronkite made itar where he stood. i think media is doing same thing with donald trump. melissa: so who, which character is donald trump in that? is the dog? is the hose? like what is the analogy? >> closer to the fire hose i think. closer to the fire hose. >> also we have to look where we've gotten, right, how we ended up with hillary clinton and donald trump. donald trump who is representing voice of people who have not been represented, how did we get here? by the fact media are in two such strong camps right, where people don't feel like their vice is being heard. so you get a successful candidate like donald trump. this election should cause a lot of introspection on everyone, recognize people have their own viewpoints. but you are so right, melissa, making sure you challenge. media is supposed to be the gatekeepers and watchdog. they should be playing role. >> that is the role they're playing. melissa: there you go names james. that was my point. >> probably good to know, may see john harwood pl

. >> chris got his first taste in 1964 for walter cronkite. in 1975, he launched his career at wnbc new york, and rose quickly and by 1982 was nbc's chief white house correspondent where he covered the reagan administration. when you knew that that was not true. >> chris, i'm glad you asked that. >> at nbc, he covered the 1980, 84, and 88 elections and hosted meet the press from 1987 to '88. in the 90s, senior correspondent at abc news and substituted as a host on night line. in 2003, he filled tony snow's seat as anchor of fox news sunday. >> good morning, and welcome to fox news sunday, volume two. >> at fox, chris interviewed world leaders, celebrities and presidents including four interviews with barack obama. as one of fox's campaign cowboys, he's covered and analyzed a 2004, 2008, and 2012 elections. this election cycle, chris moderated fox news channel two republican primary debates. the first of which was the highest non-sports cable broadcast of all time. >> and remember, fox news has the race for the white house covered all the way t

and the editorial director for news 21 at arizona state university, he's the professor at its walter cronkitessor i want to start with you because you and your students spent just an -- an incredible amount of time looking into the issue of voter fraud. you looked at all 50 states. you looked at a billion, with a "b," votes cast between the years 2000 and 2001. what did you find in terms of voter fraud? >> by querying all 50 states for prosecutions for voter fraud we found only about 2,000 from the year 2000 to the year 2012. and only 10 of those actually involved voters trying to impersonate somebody else at the polls, which is what trump is -- is saying would be widespread. and then we decided in 2016 to go back again, to five key states where officials had been worried about voter fraud and we found only about 38 prosecutions for any kind of vote fraud during that period and no prosecutions for voter impersonation. >> okay. very interesting findings. so, 2,000 cases, mr. waldman, over the course of ten years, so 200 a year, in disparate states, that they were able to identify. that would n

. >> but i was saying when i was a kid, it was walter cronkite, you had the debates, conversations atapers, we have every way of possible of finding out information about our candidates. we can't let it become what it's become now. there's a lot of time on our hands to fill up 24 hours of news and a lot of things that get covered have nothing to do with the issues and perhaps we can get respect back into our system. we have a lot of great candidates that are running. >> this thing went in a direction and we're in the final stages of the election and i think it's created vitriol. we have to abandon that and get back to something more civilized? >> where are you and your boys on election night? sitting in tv? >> i have a barn and we have friends over election night and we'll see who wins and probably eat pizza and drink beers and get on with it. >> sheryl crow, thank you so much. >> change.org, make it short. >> sheryl, thank you. >>> next, donald trump says he needs the state of florida to claim victory on election day. does the math pan out for him? we'll discuss that. >>> plus, could

chris got his first taste of presidential politics in 1964 as a go for for news legend walter cronkiteunched his career at wnbc in new york. rose quickly chief white house correspondent where he covered the reagan administration. >> at your last news conference four months ago, you said that israel had nothing to -- the u.s. had nothing to do with israeli armed shipments to iran when you knew that that was not true. why did you say that? >> chris, i'm glad you asked that. >> at nbc he covered the 1980, 1984, and 1988 elections and hosted nbc meet the press from 1987 to 1988. in the 90's he served as senior correspondent at nbc news and substituted as host on nightline. 2003 he filled tony snow seat as anchor of "fox news sunday." >> good morning and welcome to "fox news sunday" volume 2. >> at fox chris has interviewed world leaders, celebrities and presidents including four interviews with barack obama. as one of fox news campaign cowboys he has covered and analyzed the 2004, 2008, and 2012 elections. this election cycle chris moderated fox news channel's two republican primary debate

friday is the 100th anniversary of the birth of walter cronkite the legendary long time anchorman of the cbs evening news. and saturday kicks off the two-day long, 5,000 egg giant omelet celebration in abbeville, in washington for a look at what's ahead on "face the nation." good morning, john. >> dickerson: good mortgage, jane, lot of confusion abut this new e-mail news we'll try to clear that up with some new developments and have conversation with vice president joe biden and man would like to replace i am john pence. >> pauley: we'll be watching. next week here on "sunday morning." >> i want to be the president for everyone in this country. >> we are going to win back the white house. >> pauley: taking stock. ame up. ...with this idea of four towers that were fire escapes... ...essentially. i'll build a little model in photoshop and add these... ...details in with a pen. i could never do that with a mac. i feel like my job is... ...to put out there just enough detail to spur the audiences... ...imagination to fill in all the blanks. this windows pc is amazing, having all of my to

and i sound like a dinosaur when i saw this, i grew up with walter cronkite, the 6:30 news, i grew upad many less options for finding information. we had newspapers and we had the evening news. and we sat around and we had conversations and we talked in our communities. it was much more civilized. i don't think that we're learning anything more by it being two years than if it were eight months. >> of all the songs you've written and sung, which one most applies to this election? you have about 20 seconds to think about it. >> "god bless this mess." >> and if they want to sign your petition, what do they do? >> change.org/makeitshort. >> you would like it really short? two weeks, three weeks? >> i would like it to be about four days. no, i want it to be fair and everybody to have an opportunity to speak. but we know our candidates' issues and experience, so do we need to drag it out this long? >> god bless you, sheryl crow, and god bless this mess 2016. it certain has been that. sheryl crow. we'll be right back. ifoue searching other av sites find a be price... ..top clickinground...

but, i miss the days when the walter cronkites or individuals and the barbara walters whether you want to call them -- or the bernard shawls, they were men and woman who could argue and discuss both sides of the issue. i miss the old tv show they used to have, point counter point. >> cross fire. >> cross fire. i really do miss that. >> i have a question. >> yeah, yeah. >> what is better served, my debating justice as i did for two hours about what that meant or you interviewing two smart lawyers? >> i would hope i would have a better -- i wouldn't interview two dumb lawyers let alone two smart lawyers. why would you change lawyers? i would want to interview you and justice briar. that's where i think -- >> you are better served when they clash. >> but, again, how about a justice briar and clarence thomas in the same studio and then that means you and i or whoever is doing it, we have to be able to address both sides. i'm just saying that's one of the things i miss. i would add one other thing, that is this argument of what's going to happen after the election. if you listen to donald t

vote over here and the liberals, progressives but i miss the days when the 10 couples and the walter cronkite's and individuals in the barbara walters, whatever you want to call them or the bernard shaw, these are men and women who by the way argued both sides of the issue. i miss the old tv show that they used to have point, counterpoint. >> i really do miss that. >> i have a question. my debating justice prior to this was in my studio that you are interviewing to smart lawyers. >> i would interview to dump lawyers let alone smart lawyers. >> i would want to interview you and justice prior. that's what i would do. >> i believe were asking him on the opposing viewpoint. >> but again, justice breyer and tomlinson used to tell andthen that means that you and i or whoever , we've got to create to address both sides, i'm just saying that's one of the things that i miss and i would add one other thing and that is after the election, if you listen to donald trump, he says what's going to happen if he doesn't win is a conspiracy. and he's already sold and wanted and the folks earlier, he's already con