are debating putin, how scary karaganov is, how restrained he is.ssion was led by serhii karaganov, known as a proponent of pre-emptive and limited nuclear strikes against our enemies, sees them as a means of preventing a global nuclear apocalypse. and this is where we immediately hit the bull by the horns, do we need to use nuclear weapons now? the answer is no. nevertheless, we understand very well that the acceleration of movement on the ladder is... karaganov again sharpens the topic, but, as they say, on soft feet, they say, it is still necessary to move in this direction. of course, it is probably too early to go to nuclear escalation, but move towards it it is necessary that in order to cool down our opponents, they will go crazy. especially europeans, the audience gasped. karaganov pressed again and again, and putin, as a delicate person who feels the unconditional difference in weight categories, answered carefully, for example, sometimes like this. in this case, i'm sorry, i'm afraid to injure your imperial consciousness. well , the purpos

are debating putin, how scary karaganov is, how restrained putin is.v, known as a supporter of a preventive and limited nuclear strike against our enemies, led the discussion. sees them as a means of preventing a global nuclear apocalypse. and here we are at once bika zaroga should we use nuclear weapons now? the answer is no. nevertheless, we fully understand that accelerating the movement on the ladder of nuclear escalation can wash a large number of lives, because it can fool our opponents. karaganov again sharpens the topic, but, as they say on soft feet, they say, move in this direction. of course, now it is early, probably, to go to nuclear escalation, but it is necessary to move towards it, so that in order to cool down our opponents, they will go crazy, especially the europeans, the audience will lose their breath, karaganov pressed again and again, and putin, as a delicate person who feels the unconditional difference in weight categories, answered carefully, for example, sometimes yes, in this case i'm sorry, i'm afraid to cause trauma to you

are debating putin, how terrible karaganov and ...ned putin is. serhii karaganov, known as a supporter of a preventive and limited nuclear strike against our enemies, led the discussion. sees them as a means of preventing a global nuclear apocalypse, and here we immediately have a bull by the horns, should we use nuclear now weapons? the answer is no. however, we understand very well that speeding up the ladder of nuclear escalation can save lives forever, because it can outsmart our adversaries. karaganov again sharpens the topic, but, as they say, on soft feet, they say, it is still necessary to move in this direction. of course, now it is probably too early to start a nuclear escalation, but it is necessary to move towards it, so that in order to cool down our opponents, they will go crazy, especially the europeans. the audience gasped, karaganov pressed time after time, and putin... like a man delicate, feeling the unconditional difference in weight categories, answered carefully, for example, sometimes yes, in this case, i'm sorr

as a decent person, sergei karaganov is under western sanctions.wn as a supporter of a preventive limited nuclear strike against our enemies. sees them as means of prevention. previously, putin said that nuclear tests we will carry them out only if the united states carries them out first. at the forum, this if sounded with a completely different meaning. not if the americans, but if necessary, there will be a completely different turn, but if necessary, we will conduct tests as long as necessary, if there is no such thing either, since our information capabilities, computer ones , allow us to produce everything in today’s form. it is clear that the entire topic of security, no matter what aspect was discussed, was in the context of the svo. it’s clear that everyone wants it. faster, but for the president speed is not the main thing, here’s why: is it possible to increase speed of solving the problems we face? it is possible, but this is directly proportional to the losses, understanding my responsibility, i still proceed from what the general staf

for karaganov, it’s like a hunting trophy. the europeans do not have a missile attack warning system. our tactical nuclear weapons are many times more powerful and there are more of them. the americans are unlikely to get involved with their strategic weapons in the event of such an exchange. nuclear strikes in europe, and a still-delayed response to karaganov about the fact that a limited nuclear strike would save human lives, but would not save them, and losses could increase indefinitely. returning to an absolutely serious manner, putin categorically draws the line, he clearly does not want to be associated with this topic, which is being imposed on him from the west, too. but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, we do not have such a need, because our armed forces are not just gaining experience, increasing their efficiency, our defense-industrial complex demonstrates its effective work, i have already done it many times i said, i can repeat, we there... increased the production of ammunition by m

petersburg was not the russian karaganov, but western journalists. we to that risk? we are always being accused of waving some kind of nuclear baton, but am i just accusing question, huh? the possibility of using nuclear weapons, you did this, you bring me up on this topic, and then you will say that i waved a nuclear baton, and he immediately said, i ’ll answer now, let’s go, go according to the headlines. not only before use, even before the threat of use. for some reason, the west believes that russia will never use this. we have a nuclear doctrine. look what is written. application is possible in exceptional cases. i do not believe that such a case has arisen, and there is no such need. but this is doctrine, this is living tool. they are all kept in national parks so that they do not bother us. if someone wants hygiene, we can give it to you. we have enough of our own. where does this desire come from to turn the whole world into nuclear ashes? i don’t know how many times today you practically proposed to the supreme commander-in-chief to start a

’s dialogue with the president, when karaganov’s question was very interesting, latently this questionut is it possible to somehow make sure that something is already determined and nothing more can be done in this regard, to which the president subtly remarked that no, no one doesn't back down, that's absolutely right, no what sense does it make from the market, from this, but he said that, well, it’s generally not true that only... private business can be effective, sometimes a state company is very effective, so it follows from this that it cannot be indiscriminate, everything can be divided into privatization, not privatization, which is quite possible, and we know that this is so, and you know that this is so, and indeed the market sometimes does miracles, indeed private business sometimes does miracles, but... it worked, for us, if sports , then with records, if it’s a holiday... then it’s a national holiday, we love traditions, honor our history, value family , strong relationships, admire how the country is blossoming, there are even more achievements ahead of us, fall in love

the moderator of the discussion, sergei karaganov, introduced them as fighters with rich experience,the president of zimbabwe. i don’t have, well, these are the partners, what should we do now, fight with everyone, or what? but we must strive, of course, for such agreements and conditions that would... correspond to our interests and be as reliable as possible, you are right that it is very difficult to negotiate with such a public, they deceive at every step, they say one thing, they do something else, and it’s sad, but all armed conflicts end in some kind of peace agreements, however, as one of the former leaders told me, a fairly significant european country, all these agreements can be based either on a military basis... find someone with whom we are ready for these negotiations, well, only on the terms that we agreed on when we started these negotiations in minsk and then in istanbul, and not on some kind of fiction, but even if we take those agreements in istanbul as a basis, we must still proceed from the realities of today, and the realities, according to the president, are s

karaganov and what what is his position?ith tactical nuclear weapons against our enemy in order to stabilize the situation, in order to roll back within the framework of this crazy current escalation. peskov said stop. we proceed from the fact that karaganov is a more multi-faceted personality, and we do not plan, until , in any case, we talk about it officially, to talk so openly at... by this minute on time, and for some variants of weapons, he will agree on the nomenclature did not indicate this, these orders are being overfulfilled, and the front, he emphasized, is saturated with weapons, while today the head of sberbank gref said that the russian economy, as it seems to him, is developing right now according to a too simple model, busy production. we are talking , among other things, about enterprises of the military-industrial complex, there are not enough people in three, four shifts in a 2:4 to 7 mode, wages are rising as a consequence, wages are rising as a consequence, that means people have money, that means they

spoke about the need for de-escalation and softened the rhetoric of the discussion moderator sergei karaganovoncept of a preventive nuclear strike asked whether russia should act more decisively. nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki, three to four times, but i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to that, we don’t even need to think about this topic . vladimir putin found himself in a rather unusual situation: he had to constantly moderate the ardor of the discussion moderator; an ardent anti-western was chosen for this role. political scientist sergei karaganov. he stated that it is extremely important for russia to accelerate the pace of military operations and strive for escalation, including with the use of nuclear weapons. putin categorically rejected both. he believes that higher speed is only possible with large losses, but for him , concern for human lives is more important. this position impressed the forum guests, especially, putin emphasized, with the russian character , no nuclear weapons

the answer was obviously intended to reduce the nuclear tension, but sergei karaganov is not ready tot this question, i bring it to the end. if we do not go more decisively along the ladder of escalation, then we have not warmed up even the almighty, because the almighty once showed us the way when he was for dissipation and debauchery. destroyed sodom and gomorrah with fiery rain, so maybe let’s remember this rain, let’s try to enlighten humanity or that part of humanity, who lost faith in god lost her mind. without me, maybe you will set the heat there, they are already scared, although, although, of course, one might think, about the europeans, you say, any logic is possible, which means, well, if god forbid, it comes to some blows, then everyone... must understand that russia has an early warning system, a warning system, early warning of a missile attack, the united states has it, there is no such developed system anywhere else in the world, we have it, in europe there are no developed systems, they in this sense, more or less defenseless, this is the first, second, second, the p

the moderator is sergei karaganov, of course, he is an expert, a great expert in international politicsipolarity of the world, which we already know in advance, will be discussed, they will be final from all sides as accurate as possible, new contacts, and i am sure now also about this will be discussed, because traditionally vladimir putin makes a large number of economic statements during plenary meetings here in st. petersburg. of course, some of the statements were already made when vladimir putin, on the first day, the starting day of the forum, met with the heads of the information agent, but there, probably, there was still more of a political aspect, here there will probably be more of a geopolitical aspect, an economic aspect . how to achieve the goals that are facing both our country and ours today partners, let me remind you that now, for example, the level of gdp at the end of the first quarter is a little more than 5%. russia is among... the top four countries in terms of purchasing power parity and we are in the same top in terms of growth rates, about them now we will def

, some chronic karaganov, who, in principle, may not have his opinion, but he says that at one pointmay have to use nuclear weapons because it will end the war and will overturn... not the big chessboard that brzezinski talked about, that is, to change everything, to start over, why do they say that , i think it's important, they feel that unlike other nuclear, big nuclear powers like china, the united states, france, the united kingdom, where there is no talk at all that they do not have enough resources, that they are going somewhere wrong, but in russia there is already a feeling that the resource... may not be enough if this war drags on , of course, ukraine has problems, but ukraine has partner support, but also russia has problems, and judging by the fact that they are already saying it now, these problems may appear during the preparation of the budget for next year, and now they are discussing it and want to hint and show in their new doctrine that if russia, well , it seems to me that, from what i have heard... in recent days, what putin, karaganov, and yapkov have been sayi

roughly understand where he will go, or there, that means, fyodor lukyanov led, too suddenly, here karaganov, the courage to voice these questions to the president, not everyone manages to do this, but i understood, i saw from the siberian cities that they are there... how to promote politics , ideology, with which i, of course, completely disagree, well, that’s a different matter, they are basically monarchists there, they have a slightly different one, but will he ask these questions about, among other things, this nuclear ladder, which i’m escalating, by the way? , i never agreed with a preventive strike, never, although, although at the same time i must note that the two questions that the president answered clearly and clearly should be of interest to our audience. and what does it mean when you poke around here today in kherson, it means people are mourning. solovyov says, but you are not immersed in the negotiations of this west, and what orban said today or yesterday, you understand, after all, these are the heads of state, and it would be stupid, you say, well, questions are, of cou

, who is a chronic karaganov, who, in principle, may not have his own opinion, but he says that at soment russia may have to apply nuclear weapons, because it will end the war and overturn the big chessboard that brzezinski talked about, that is, change everything, start over, why do they say this, i think it is important, they are from... that unlike other nuclear, large nuclear powers, such as china, the united states, france, the united kingdom, where there is no talk at all that they do not have enough resources, that they are going nowhere, but in russia there is already a feeling that the resources may not be enough, if this war drags on, of course, ukraine has problems, but ukraine there is partner support, but russia also has problems, and judging by... the fact that they are already saying this, these problems may appear during the preparation of the budget for next year. and now they are discussing it, and they want to hint and show in their new doctrine that if russia, well, it seems so to me, from what i have heard in recent days, what putin, karaganov, and yapkov say, then

it appears, you will immediately begin to use it against us or threaten us, because you understand, karaganov nagasaki, let’s bomb ourselves so that there will be fewer casualties in the future. nuclear bombs around will cause millions of victims , including ours, but i assumed that this conversation would take place, and frankly speaking, i am happy about this conversation, but there is no need to put an end to it, if, for example, putin says, let’s not print out the constitution, let’s not let this mean ideology, which means everything, stopped, or, for example, we will not supply weapons in exchange for the fact that...

, sergey karaganov, well, he is such an apologist this promotion of the topic of nuclear incinerator, and they played out the scenario today that he asks putin a question, and putin says, no, we will not use these weapons, we have enough of our own ... conventional forces to achieve the result, you understand, yes, that is, it is all a game, and god forbid, he will come to someone such a decision, well, i think that there can also be deterrent mechanisms, at least, i think that in the us it is understood, in any case, any movement, everyone, all charges under control, any movement, if only will begin, you... you see, it will appear immediately in the key intelligence agencies of the world, because then the americans will leak this information immediately, and those intelligence agencies that have access, they will leak immediately. this is all in the information space, because it is without a doubt, so that you do not doubt, so now it is necessary to understand that even without nuclear weapons they are killing our people, and the number of dead, in principle, on the part of russia h

, serhii karaganov, well, such an apologist for this promotion of the topic, nuclear and incinerationes, and they played out the scenario today that he asks putin a question, and putin says, no, we will not use these weapons, she. enough of your conventional forces to achieve the result, you you see, yes, that is, it's all a game, and god forbid, he will come to some kind of decision, well , i think there can be deterrents, at least, i think in the us they understand that, anyway, whatever - what kind of movement, everyone, all the warheads are under control, any movement, if only after... it starts, you will see, it will appear immediately in the key information agencies of the world, because then the americans will immediately leak this information, and those intelligence that has access, they immediately pour it all into the information space, because it is without a doubt that you do not doubted, so now it is necessary to understand that even without nuclear weapons, our people are being killed, and the number of dead, in principle, on the part of russia has already been exceeded.

from the very beginning of the special military operation, karaganov took a harsh position towards thedea that was, of course, unpopular in society, and wrote a long article on the use of nuclear weapons. weapons on ukraine for the purpose of de-escalation, absolutely incredible, we are all opponents of nuclear war, i think everyone will agree with this, but nevertheless, this suggests that given the current level of escalation, tension, anxiety, a phenomenal discussion is expected. united states, creating chaos while behind the ocean, of course, is a thing. they feel joy, when russian ships and submarines are off the coast of cuba, they go there and the risk of long-range missile strikes comes to the american borders, they are nervous and worried. as for our conflict, the special military operation of the aerospace forces today launched a new massive combined strike using geranium calibers and uavs on the western, southern and central regions of ukraine, and the airfield was hit. starokonstantinov, as well as an industrial facility in the kiev region, is also reported about the arriva

, sergey karaganov, well, he is such an apologist for promoting the topic of nuclear and incineratione scenarios today. that he asks putin a question, and putin says, no, we will not use it these weapons, we have enough of our conventional forces to achieve the result, you understand, yes, that is, it's all a game, and god forbid, he will come to some such decision, well , i think there can also be deterrents, at least, i think that in the us they understand that, in any case, any movement... of everyone, all the ammunition under control, any movement, if it starts, you will see, it will appear immediately, in the key intelligence agencies of the world , because then the americans will leak this information right away, and those intelligence agencies that have access, they will leak all this is immediately in the information space, because it is without a doubt, so that you do not doubt, so now it is necessary to understand that even without nuclear weapons , our people are being killed. and the number of dead in principle on the part of russia has already exceeded the number of dead

as peskov said, the head of state read karaganov’s article about.scalating the conflict in ukraine, look at the news, this is 60 minutes, all the best. vladimir putin is speaking at this moment at the main plenary session of the st. petersburg international economic forum. his key statements, the latest news from the northern capital, as well as the progress of the special military operation are in the news right now. in the studio evgeny rashkov. hello. the incomes of citizens in russia should grow faster than the economy, the president said. by 2030, it is necessary to create in the country digital platforms in all key industries. the situation in the world has changed dramatically. currencies of unfriendly states has halved, while the share of the ruble in export and import transactions is growing, today it is approaching 40%. from 21 to 23, the share of the ruble in payments for russian exports increased almost three times to 39%, three times, and together with our foreign partners we will increase the use of national currencies. in foreign trad

all the time, when such threats at first, and then he repeats, no, no, no, russia will not use, as karaganov, he is such an apologist for this promotion of the topic of nuclear and incineration strikes, and they ... played the scenario today, what he asks question to putin, and putin says, no, we will not use these weapons, we have enough of our conventional forces to achieve the result, you understand, yes, that is, it is all a game, and god forbid, he will come to some such decision, well i think there might also be deterrents, at least i think that in the usa they understand this, in any case... any movement, everyone, all ammunition under control, any movement, if it starts, you will see, it will appear immediately in the key intelligence agencies. the world, because then the americans, and those intelligence agencies that have access, will immediately leak this information, they will immediately leak it all into the information space, because it is without a doubt, so that you do not doubt, so now it is necessary to understand that even without nuclear weapons they kill of our people, a

president of the republic of zimbabwe emerson dambudzo mnangagwa, moderator of the plenary session sergei karaganov

russia will not use, like karaganov, serhiy karaganov, well, he is such an apologist for this promotionnd incineration strikes. and they played out the scenario today that he asks putin a question, and putin says: "no, we will not use these weapons, we have enough of our conventional forces to achieve the result." you understand, right? that is, it's all a game. and, god forbid, ... he will come to some such decision, well, i think that there can also be deterrents, at least, i think that in the us they understand that, in any case, any transfer, everyone, all charges are under control, any transfer, as soon as it starts, you will see, it will appear immediately in the key information agencies of the world, because then the americans and others will pour this information right away. from where, who have access, they will immediately pour all this into the information space, because it is without a doubt, so that you do not doubt, so now it is necessary to understand that even without nuclear weapons , our people are being killed, and the number of dead, in principle, on the part of russ

so, as the press secretary of the russian president dmitry peskov said, it will be sergei karaganov,his is how dmitry peskov, a wide-ranging expert, that is , a specialist in politics and economics and security issues, described it, so obviously, it is he who will today be able to... political goals, freezing and conversations are already quite specific, and the expropriation of russian sovereign assets, among other things, indicates that the jurisdictions around which the modern one was built. financial system has ceased to be reliable, we must take these new risks into account, including when developing the design of payment, settlement and investment mechanisms. in other words, in the course of our discussion we want from... and if there is an opportunity to further raise the question, what are the main priorities of the russian government in promoting national strategic goals to ensure safe, sustainable and stable national development and growth. please, valentinovich, thank you, andrey lenevich, thank you for the opportunity to say that whatever, i will try to speak briefly on t

karaganov is known in political science circles as a supporter of more active development of the nuclearponent of the russian army, but is it possible to use these weapons preventively? we have everything written there, this application is possible in an exceptional, precisely in an exceptional case, in the event of a threat to sovereignty and territorial integrity parties to exclude. it is possible, but this is directly proportional to the losses, understanding my responsibility, i still proceed from what the general staff, the ministry of defense proposes, speed is important, but even more important is caring for the life and health of our guys who are fighting at the front. combat work is underway, just since the beginning of this year, 40, in my opinion, settlements have been liberated, 880, in my opinion, km, we are gradually squeezing the enemy out of the territory of donbass from other adjacent territories, here at the general staff the ministry of defense has plans for the implementation and achievement of all our goals, we are following this plan. hostages of a global conflict b

evgeny, back in 2002, our most interesting political scientist sergei aleksandrovich karaganov made ante that i do not rule out, this is a non-verbal quote, this is its essence, that the time will come when the european union will be more hostile to us than the united states. wanted to acknowledge this fact, that is , indeed the position of the european union is even more hostile to us than the united states, and hence the moment is very, in my opinion, indicative, look at the conflict between whom and whom today in the european union. miloni is dissatisfied with some appointments, such as kallos and company, that is, in the european union she is no longer among the european elites. a new reality, there are no pro-russian, anti-russian forces there, the question is who is a little less russophop, this is approximately the same situation, in my opinion, is now observed in the european union, the question is who is a little less russoph. the third moment is very curious and dangerous, indeed, as our army will win, they will strive to enter into some kind of negotiations. look at us all t

petersburg was not the russian karaganov, but western journalists., and then you will say that i waved a nuclear baton, he immediately said, i now i’ll answer, it’s going, it’s going according to the headlines, it’s going, it’s going, and i noticed that not a single media outlet described the context of president putin’s answer, that he was answering a question, and no one gave his words that it’s not me i’m speaking proactively, and you ’re asking me, welcome to the media, they often indulge in this, the only country, the united states, that used nuclear weapons in the second world war, harashima nagasaki 20 kt, our tactical nuclear weapons are 70-75 kilotons, such nuclear tactical weapons, let’s do not bring not only to use, even before the threat of use, for some reason in the west they believe that russia will never use this, but we have a nuclear doctrine. look at what is written, application is possible in exceptional cases, i do not believe that such a case has arisen, and there is no such need, but this is a doctrine, this is a living instrum

it must be said that sergei karaganov quite firmly defended the position of the need for the preventiver weapons in order to, as he put it, the st. petersburg forum of the plenary session , the president said a lot of important things, i don’t even know where to start, but of course, i don’t know where to answer, because the session is really so intense and long, and the president went over a very wide range of issues, so it won’t be easy for you and me, yes andreyvich, and most importantly, i was surprised, although we all seemed to know how horseshoe is probably not the right word, how deeply immersed the head of state is in economic terms, well, there are just a lot of numbers that even we economists can’t reproduce from memory, the preparation of the head of state was obvious, it’s generally striking in the president, i noticed this back in 2000, when i accompanied him in the first campaign election campaign, here he comes to a car plant, as if he had been producing cars all his life, we come to some other enterprise, as if he was in this industry, he has amazing skills. experts hav

the moderator of the plenary session is sergey karaganov. and good afternoon, friends, yes, dear gentlemen presidents, and dear colleagues, dear friends, and i have been given a great honor, and it has been a great pleasure to take you to my homeland, my homeland, spent 10 years in one prison, two in another, survived , had two death sentences when he became president, he overturned the death sentence on his side. good afternoon, dear friends, colleagues! dear mr. abse, dear mr. manangawa, dear guests, friends, ladies and gentlemen, i am very pleased to welcome you all to the twenty-seventh st. petersburg international economic forum. this year, over 19 thousand people from more than a hundred countries around the world became its participants and guests. these are shareholders and leaders of leading companies, recognized. experts and analysts, political, public, government figures. traditionally, the forum in st. petersburg provides an opportunity not only to establish business contacts, agree on cooperation or launch promising projects, but in an open discussion to exchange views on curr

tactical or strategic, was raised quite actively during the session, including by moderator sergei karaganovpresident turned out to be faithful to his positions, which he had voiced more than once in recent months and once again repeated what to mention you definitely shouldn’t talk about nuclear weapons in sue, and probably shouldn’t do it. nuclear weapons are three times more powerful than the bombs used by the americans against kheroshima and nagasaki, three to four times, we have many times more in number, of course, these same europeans will have to think if, therefore, those with whom we exchange such blows will not exist, they knit. in this exchange of strikes, are the americans already at the level of strategic weapons or not? i really doubt. and europeans should think about this too. dumbly, but, but, i still proceed from the fact that it will never come to this, well, for now europeans and americans, instead of listening to the signals that are heard these days from st. petersburg, continue to celebrate the landing of the normandy allies, the anniversary, and today a video is being

sergei karaganov, as said by the press secretary of the russian president, dmitry peskov.ed expert, in other words, a specialist in politics, economics, security issues, in other words, in key topics, which are obvious in vladimir putin’s speech today one way or another will concern. the same dmitry. peskov clarified that the central topic of the president’s speech will be the economy, and this is understandable, taking into account the specifics of the current forum, traditionally the speech of the head of state here, on this platform, is always in one way or another related to economic issues, the president gives an assessment of what has been done, what what needs to be emphasized, and in the long term, we are often talking not only about the short term, because, for example, 2 years ago the head of state said: the need to create a supply economy in the country, it is obvious that this goal will not be realized in the shortest possible time, and yet, this is exactly what is worth striving for, so such plans for the long term will certainly be announced by the president

petersburg. a few minutes before the start of the main event, on the sidelines sergei karaganov sees 24. what to expect. thousands of spectators' voices and millions of television viewers will immediately be directed at them, so it would be better, of course, to clarify the approximate course of events. i say something there, such words became almost prophetic, since the first brightest moment of the forum turned out to be. what you said sounds offensive both to the government of the russian federation and to other structures, you said, we are doing something, i spent a whole hour here explaining what we are doing, but we don’t know, i think you lit a little cigarette, like you grunted, as the people say, and didn’t hear anything, what i’m saying, who nothing happened until the rooster pecked, we ’ll send the rooster into the soup, now i’m already. no, because he doesn’t trample hens, why is he needed this rooster, the rooster is not a rooster, but 4.5 in the first quarter of this year, the result of our targeted activities, weren’t you upset that at the very beginning we practically

karaganov’s recent publication is about this , that is, why?l, this concept of fear is costly, apparently this fear is no longer there, physically, so to speak, absent, generations have changed, perhaps people have forgotten what those explosions in nagasaki were like. nuclear deterrence activities added: this is the deployment near the borders of russia of material and technical means capable of carrying nuclear weapons. this is a reminder that f-16s can carry nuclear weapons, and this is another motive for nuclear deterrence measures, which we naturally carry out without replacement, in the form of, for example, exercises using non-strategic nuclear weapons, and regarding use, read . damaging military infrastructure, which can be used for early warning of an attack, this is also a belli incident, and recent ukrainian attempts to attack radar stations, which, by the way, are primarily designed to monitor long-range nuclear attacks, are playing with fire. gentlemen, this is a danger, and even the overseas patrons who slapped these experimenters

vladimir putin is familiar with the often provocative ideas of sergei karaganov.own in the country, and not only as an economist, but as a political scientist, and a bright one, quite energetically aggressive in some areas of thought, but it is always interesting to listen to such people. the moderator developed the economic discussion in his own style. what kind of model are we building anyway? proceed from the realities of our country, and everything here is very important, our history, culture and the internal state of society, real development is very important, what works effectively in our society, what doesn’t, well, of course there are basic things, we take these basic things into account, and the rooster there is not a rooster, but 3.4 height or 3, we had 6 last year, which hasn’t been fully calculated yet, it’s still an indicator, but what about four? 5 in the first quarter of this year, this is also an indicator, but it is still the result of our common work and the government, the business community, to a certain extent the central bank and the adminis

this is just a symptom, and therefore , of course, a bad symptom for the united. his conversation with karaganov the center, when the west had technology, finance, thoughts, as they say, the economy, when it was on the rise, when a lot of things were possible there learn, and another situation is when we see how all this flows there to the east, towards china, the asian, pacific, asian region, and i think this is a very important idea, why it is very important, because... it , she says, this suggests that this is not a seven-minute solution, and this is already a new vector of movement of our nation in that direction, in the direction where we can get better knowledge, better experience, better trade, better economy, and this is very important for those who expect that this is how it is now if only it would cost everything back. “we don’t want a nuclear war, this is an important, this is an important thought, the third thought, which, excuse me, i expressed here, you did not appreciate it at the time, but three weeks ago, i said that we need to supply weapons wherever , where, they didn’t apprec

karaganov about this, that is, why because when we were talking about the cold war, after all, this concept, first of all, politicians and diplomats for contacts and dialogue. today, apparently, this fear is no longer physically present. uh, so to speak, absent, uh, generations have changed, perhaps people have forgotten what those explosions were like in nagasaki, in another japanese city. wants war, more than anything else, more than millions of our belarusians, i do not accept and do not want war, everything that is unfolding against us under the control of the special services, you know who, of course, not polish or lithuanian, they are already in charge there, but money is given for weapons, for armed struggle, for seizing at least a piece of land on the territory of belarus, they need this. americans, first of all, not even europeans. yes, alexander davydovich, here is a chronicle of the acute phase of the military conflict in ukraine - this is a chain of constant raising of the ceiling, a possible lowering of the risk threshold by the west. and this is what alexander grigorevich is t

scientific director of the faculty world economy and world politics of the higher school of economics sergei karaganov never started this rhetoric, i no longer remember the name of this lady, the former prime minister of great britain, who, when asked when she stopped, the prime minister, said that she was ready to press the nuclear button, we so no they said never, that’s how it all started, we simply answered that yes, we need to take this more seriously, we immediately started talking about the fact that... i forgot about sodom and gomorrah, so maybe we’ll remember about this rain and try to get back together again part of humanity that has lost faith in god has lost its mind, without me, maybe you will set the heat there, they are already scared, but if you still rely on the existing nuclear doctrine, any logic is possible, but if god forbid... it leads before any blows, then everyone should understand that russia has a sprm system, an early warning system for missile attacks, the united states does, but europe does not have a developed system. in this sense, they are more or less defenseless. the

slide of europe and the whole world into a possible nuclear conflict, in this sense , the figure of karaganov, this is very... decreasing on the battlefield, that is, without this it is no longer possible to hold the front, before they thought that it was enough to give helmets, then they added javelins, then this is the addition of everything for some beautiful pr- clothes emphasizes the growing power of our army, because beautiful videos, we remember, we need to free the leopards, and free leopards showed some spotted pussies, in fact, these leopards did not do anything, but now... we are talking about providing more and more serious weapons, the question arises, what else can the west convey next? perhaps the f16, which is a carrier of nuclear weapons, this is probably where the list ends, well, yes, then, in general, we’ll be hitting further, not the f16. well, ukraine is really turning into a concentration camp, this can be seen, but the united states itself is turning before our eyes, we said from a banana republic, but in my opinion this is also... if not a concentration camp, then cer

the conversation lasted about 4 hours, the moderator of the session was political scientist sergei karaganovspecial operation, the possibility of negotiations with ukraine on what will happen to the russian military-industrial complex after the end of the northern military district. during the discussion of ukrainian issues, the participants raised the topic of a possible nuclear escalation of the conflict. and vladimir putin noted that there is no need to speculate on this topic again. more than 11. militants were lost in the ssu in the svo area over the past week. more than 60 armored vehicles and 11 tanks. during the counter-battery fight, 162 guns were hit. more than 80 ukrainian counterattacks were repelled. the enemy was driven back in several directions at once, the settlements of paraskoveevka and umanskaya were liberated. the number of victims and wounded as a result of the massive shelling of lugansk increased to 50, four civilians were killed. the entrance to the five-story building completely collapsed. a terrorist strike was carried out by american long-range atacama missiles on

karaganov into the kremlin,al korea.administration now basically krs messaging is in terms of what what they do? andor camille, interesting asatp the bait and, that needs to remind everyone that we're a nuclear alliance and do more. and also i would ask you about france. is what russia does in■o the realm of nuclear it says? then mike and then >> lien all three of you for doing this and good to see you. i had a question on the escalation bit as well. whathina done in restraining the potential r russia to go nuclear? to use nuclear the batfield or even a threat. he interest in china in seeing oren suring a war with y nuclear? >> michael, pbs onlinus hour. i know that you folks are not are you consulting with your economic colleagues on seems to be a new situation, not only there limits to spending. we're in a situation where t may be limits to borrowing. the united states is close do g.d.p. france is approaching what happens -- there's a lot o■ demands to spend money. how long is this -- can to2s go on or is this going to

the third, in my opinion very important, that was said at this forum and that seemed to me in sergei karaganovvoiced with the president, because it’s hidden in this forum, this is what i observed, maybe you won’t agree with me. for privatization, not privatization, which is quite perhaps, and we know that this is so, and you know that this is so, and indeed the market sometimes does miracles, indeed private business sometimes does miracles, but the only difference is that you are right, where there is no profit, it does nothing does, for example, nothing has appeared in the cinema for 2 years, so there is not a single development, no light, no cameras. nothing, why? because this investment is needed? and the market is narrow, only russia, but according to this logic, everything from there is more and more expensive. here we are talking about inflation they say, well, i don’t know, i’m not an economist, but in principle in our field everything is more and more expensive, everything, everything, everything, everything that comes from abroad, you know, well, that means this is the right idea. ..

, we look and listen to the president, sergei karaganov. and good afternoon, friends, and deeply respected

karaganov as a moderator and with his rhetoric and discourse about a preventive nuclear strike is thetiate, then these people will gain even more weight and we will no longer be able to restrain them easily even if we do this. what i was talking about, dear vladimir vladimirovich, it is unlikely that you will have the strength, the spirit to respond, excuse me, to fit in with that very europe in terms of the use of american nuclear weapons on european territory, and this automatically means that in a clash between these two groupings of companies, well, let’s say, ideologically, ideologically, image-wise, well, the one that will definitely win is not the one that leaves this blow without there is no answer, therefore, returning to the analogy, the main question itself, there is still no such collision. those local skirmishes that happen, unfortunately, are tragic and bloody there on the territory of ukraine, they are really getting bigger and the degree of escalation is increasing, but one gets the impression that the west, this is also very important, the west will try with all its m

be a political agenda, and this agenda would be quite interesting, i didn’t like that that's where karaganovgenda which will have to... everything is about a bank loan or there it means , for example, there science and led here too , very a good presenter, i also understood that a geopolitician in america knows the agenda and i roughly understand where he will go or is it fyodor lukyanov leading, yes, too, i’m suddenly here, koraganov, i wonder if he has the willpower to dare to voice ask these questions to the president, not everyone succeeds in this to do, but i understood, i saw. siberian cities, which they are there, how it is to promote politics, ideology, with which i, of course , completely disagree, well, that’s another matter, they are basically monarchists there, theirs is a little different, but will he ask these questions , including along this nuclear ladder means escalation, which, by the way, i never agreed with about a preventive strike, never, although, although at the same time i must note that the two questions that the president answered clearly and clearly are ours.. . t

petersburg economic forum, the moderator, of course, is also the eminent sergei karaganov, he has his regard, we expect that putin, of course, will comment on this crazy statement, completely idiotic, the most dangerous, especially in the current pre-nuclear world state, to say such things is, of course, i don’t know, simply, simply in the most is pushing the world to the brink of a nuclear catastrophe, will putin say that we are not planning to strike the capitol for now... of course not we know, but we'll wait. macron, this too will probably be discussed at the plenary session today, said that he is reconfirming his permission to strike at the territory of the russian federation in the near future, he is ready to start delivering mirages, all these are airplanes, well, that is, there will be not only f-16 fighters, but and french planes in the skies over ukraine and preparation. and russia makes new friends and spreads new threats, vladimir putin made a new attack towards the west and announced that russia could launch missiles attacks on nato countries. the kremlin says it is merel

the ardent anti-western political scientist sergei karaganov was chosen for this role.tressed that diplomacy comes first, especially in matters related to nuclear weapons. he said very convincingly that he was not going to use nuclear weapons. and this is a message to the whole world. and cnn, commenting on vladimir putin’s speech, points out that the russian economy could not be broken by a barrage of western sanctions. the effect was the opposite. it came as a big surprise to many who follow the russian economy that despite the incredible sanctions imposed by the united states and western allies, russia is not doing so bad, economic growth is underway, it is forecast to continue, and if you look at moscow and other russian cities, you will see how western goods are gradually being replaced, for example, by chinese ones, which is clearly visible in cars, in the situation in the area of ​​the north military district, another american tank... unmanned reconnaissance aircraft orland 30, in the same place, with the help of an fpv drone, disabled an american bradley armored

director of the faculty of world economy and world politics of the higher school of economics sergei karaganovted a conversation on the most pressing topic of the entire discussion with the president without accelerating movement along the ladder of nuclear escalation, which will not be stopped in the near future. who else will do this besides you? regarding nuclear escalation. and there is no such need, but this is a doctrine, this is a living instrument, and we carefully watch what is happening in the world around us, and do not exclude introducing some changes to this doctrine, as for the possibility of conducting real tests of nuclear weapons, if necessary, we will conduct tests as long as necessary, if there is no such thing either, such an answer seemed insufficient to the president, the moderator, the almighty once showed us the way when he. .. dissipation and debauchery destroyed sodom and gomorrah with a fiery rain, after that humanity remembered this for many years and behaved carefully, they now, but now they have forgotten about sodom and gomorrah, so maybe we will remember about t