and without advertising support, the label must do all the work. >> at first glance, the label stops you and you go, oh, that's interesting.. >> okay. >> then you grab it, you hold it in your hand. you said oh, this is en more interesting. and you go, i'making this home with me. >> the team studied the labels of competitive products to be sure the new labels won't get lost in the crowd. >> these are the positions that the competition is setting up. you're competing against the big boys. >> that's how they arrived at the brand identity which they summed up in three words. >> unhurried island craft. >> i like it. okay. >> this is the position. this is what sets you apart. >> at least, the unveiling of the first label decide. >> nice. >> top of that, i have one for you to hold in your hands. >> okay. >> we made a craft label tea label inspired by wars makan tea dancer. first notice the name, ellis family special teams. >> i'm trying to digest the name change. >> do you want to move forward to the next one? >> oh, there's more? >> yes, there is more. a second design which has the same me

our label says it. your grass proves it. get ortho weed b gon. the label tells the story. ortho home defense gives of all these household bugs - roaches, ants, and spiders. spectracide gives you year long control... of just roaches. their label says so. got more than roaches moving in? get home defense. the label tells the story. you want yeah, right.ust one? i say if it looks tasty, order it. because at red lobster's create your own seafood trio i can have it all. choose 3 of 9 dishes for just $15.99. like the creamy baked lobster alfredo. and the sizzling brown butter shrimp scampi. and fresh soy-ginger salmon topped with sweet pineapple salsa. i could go on. but there are three things on one plate waiting for me and i'd rather just go, wouldn't you? but hurry it can't last forever. you owned your car for four you named it brad. you loved brad. and then you totaled him.

the label has to do all the work. >> at first glance the label stops yound you go, that's interesting. hen you grab it, hold it in your hand and say this is more interesting and then you say, i'll taking this home with me. >> they studied with the competitive products so the new label wouldn't get lost in the crowd. >> you're competing against the big boy snas that's how they arrived at the brand identity which they summed up in three years. unhurried island craft. this is the position. this is what sets you apart. >> at last the unveiling of the first label design. >> nice. >> i have one for you to hold in your hands. we made a craft tea label inspired by jamaican dance hall posters. first off. >> ellis island family tee. >> i'm trying to adjust to the name change. >> there's more. >> there's more? >>> yes, there is more. the same message but a very different look. >> i want to introduce you to the black star line of iced tea. it's inspired by the golden age of travel. so now what we've done is created that same concept, that refreshing, relaxing, taking you on a jury tea. >> if i ha

no labels has not -- i'm representing the labels. as far as no labels supporting desantis, that's incorrect. this didn't happen. >> let me ask you for on desantis would fall under the same extremist label that you are kind of characterizing donald trump, donald trump would be characterized as someone who would consider extreme. the naacp, which he used to, lead has issued a travel advisory on rhonda says this is state, florida, because of the attack on lgbtq people, black history, he has run a campaign that is descended lee anti black -- do you restrictions apply to him? >> no labels would never support a candidate that bans books, bans books and prevents people from knowing true history. we are an anti discrimination in all its forms. also against voter suppression in all its forms. >> then he wouldn't be a candidate, you would get in if he was the nominee? >> i'm thinking now. what you mean by against voter suppression. voter suppression is also not blocking access, equal access to the ballot, which we have run into in several stat

many of the people who are critical, who have no labels, are saying that no labels is going to somehowpoil the race, it's going to elect donald trump. truth is, the critics with no labels fair competition. they fear choice. they say, oh boy, if we have too much democracy, we are going to lose our democracy. that is their argument. it's not a very good one. because two thirds of americans don't want either one of these candidates. they think trump is too crazy. they think biden is too old. and neither of the parties are listening to what voters are telling them. that is their problem. no labels is responding to the marketplace, they're trying to create some type of a centrist independent movement which i think could be very healthy for this country, it is long overdue and let's just see where the chips fall. that ship of an independent candidacy has already sailed. rfk junior in the race. i see the polling climb 20%. cornell -- so, that ship has sailed. and, that could have an impact on the electoral college. we don't know yet. we don't even have the labels candidates yet just to say ho

label it.re asking is to label it. >> transparency. >> i just want to know. >> i think it's key that you you guys have made freedom and a free society a bedrock sort of foundation in the strategy here. that always trips up people. >> states' rights. >> exactly. wave the flag. chef, thank you as always for your time. >>> for more information and to sign the food policy action petition, go to stop the dark act.com. that is all for now. i'll see you back here tomorrow at 4:00 p.m. eastern. the ed show is up next. >>> good evening, americans. welcome to the ed show live from miami, florida. i'm ready to go. let's get to work. >> voters going to the polls to pick their gop candidates to replace former congressmen trey radel. >> the 19th district. >> today republican voters will decide between these four candidates. after the fight over who is more conservative, all that money is spent and thoses thatinasty ads comes

no labels says, it has two goals. and i think they are in conflict.s is the first goal is to get people a choice, in case the candidates are biden and trump. okay. but then they -- buy the next word out of their mouths, they will do nothing to reelect donald trump. so why don't they just say now that if the republican candidate is donald trump, they aren't going to put this third party ticket on the ballot? >> this is not hard for you, as a democrat, but there are a whole lot of republicans on this show who say, i love the party, i want there to be a real republican party one day, this is not the moment for it. so in fact, the only way to keep him out of office, it's supporting biden. i'm puzzled why, in 2023, people are having trouble with the fact that right now, politics in america as distasteful as it is, is binary. >> you got it. we are where we are. i don't like it anymore than anybody else. there's a lot of things that have to be done to try to pull the american people back together again. but having a third party in this situation is not a goo

reading labels is what a responsible consumer does. but what if there are no labels. take this apple for instance. i mean, it seems perfectly fine, nutritious. that's what an apple is supposed to be. it grew on a tree. it's anapple, for goodness sake. i don't need a label. i know what it is. maybe i do need a label because sometimes an apple is more than meets the eye. when it comes to our food, even if it is not in a package, it is important to know what happens from the seed to your table because not all foods are created equally. many foods we consume daily are genetically engineered more modified. under the current law, if a food is genetically modified, it does not need to be labeled. it begs the question, if a food isn't labeled, how can consumers be responsible? especially when some of the biggest commercialized genetically crops in the crops include soy, cotton, canola, sugar beets. zucchini, yellow squash. if you know what it was, you might, just maybe might think twice about eating it. gmos result when genes from one species are forced into the genes of anot

their label says so. bugged by more than ants? get ortho bug b gon. the label tells the story. some weed killers are overzealous. they even destroy your lawn. ortho weed b gon kills weeds... not lawns. our label says it. your grass proves it. get ortho weed b gon. the label tells the story. - good journalism is about telling a story from more than one perspective. embracing diversity can enrich your story by allowing you to see things from more than just one point of view. that's a story worth telling. the more you know. >>> it was is scene yesterday afternoon at around 2:00.

you're not supposed to pitch drugs off label, right?> correct. >> but they're sending her to place where is those doctors would have to be prescribing off label. >> that's absolutely correct there was no other way for a doctor that treats children to prescribe it except for to prescribe to a child is an off label usage. pepper is representing his client in two whistleblower lawsuits against astrazeneca. they asked the court to dismiss one of the cases. this isn't the first time they have been accused of improperly marketing seroquel. in 2010 the paid half billion dollar fine after a department of justice civil investigation into how it sold seroquel including for use in children. astrazeneca declined to talk to us on camera but never pushed it's sales reps to market seroquel off label. it trains it's employees to meet or exceed industry standards and comply with the law and promote medicines in accordance with fda regulations. steven thinks the fda is part of the problem. >> as far as i'm concerned the fda in terms of regulatory activit

this is not just no labels.many other third parties now in this election than any other election since i've been able to vote. my first election was obama in 2008. i really think this scenario about not hitting 270 -- you have to get 270 electoral votes. that is in the constitution. if you don't get 270, what we discussed about the 12th amendment does happen. that's why the house and senate are so important. i believe the control of the senate is also on the ballot in 2024. every member of the house representatives, folks better make sure -- >> speaker johnson could be picking the president. >> well, well, don't even get me started on the senate now. this is my coffee. let me just -- i'm going to need a fresh cup of coffee, y'all. y'all should get one as well. we have another jam-packed hour of the weekend coming up, including the new york times is suzanne craig. she knows that michael cohen, okay. we have former january 6th investigator marcus childress as well as former assistant d.a. catherine christian. you

still to come on the katie phang show no labels.rats and anti trump republicans are teaming up ahead of 2024 to keep third-party spoiler candidates from causing chaos, in what is sure to be a tight race. former senator doug jones joins me now after the break. keep it right here, on msnbc. keep it right here, on msnbc. sam who make...? ...everyday products... ...designed smarter. like a smart coffee grinder - that orders fresh beans for you. oh, genius! for more breakthroughs like that... ...i need a breakthrough card... like ours! with 2.5% cash back on purchases of $5,000 or more... plus unlimited 2% cash back on all other purchases! and with greater spending potential, sam can keep making smart ideas... ...a brilliant reality! the ink business premier card from chase for business. make more of what's yours. sometimes, the lows of bipolar depression feel darkest before dawn. with caplyta, there's a chance to let in the lyte. caplyta is proven to deliver significant relief across bipolar depression. unlike some medicines that only t

the side that wants to label genetically labelled stuff raised about $8 million, with about 70% of itaised out of state. sounds like a lot, right? look at the other side, the don't label side. the we don't want to know side, they raised $22 million, and they raised all of it from out of state. actually, i should modify that. of the $22 million they raised, they raised $550 in washington state. not $550,000, $550 out of 22 million, which means that pie is not to scale. 10,000 people from across washington state contributed to the yes, contributed to the yes on labelling side. basically, nobody from washington state contributed to the no on labelling side. but the no side had such a huge tide of corporate money behind them, from bayer and dow agra sciences, and dupont, and basically no one was on the company's side in the fight. but those companies put so much money into it that they totally swamped the other side. and the modified food issue appears to have failed. it was dr. bronner and 10,000 donors across the state against coke and pepsi, yeah, the coke and pepsi side looks like the

despite that less than inspiring message, no labels has some pretty ambitious plans.nts to run the so-called centrist candidate for president, and while no ray labels may call itself bipartisan, it's obvious to anyone paying attention this is the plan could help reelect donald trump by siphoning moderate voters away from joe biden, the only candidate who has a substantial base of moderate voters. but don't take my word for. it listen to one of the group's former top advisers, who quit this year over the plan to run a third party candidate. >> i do not believe that an independent bipartisan third party ticket has any chance of success in 2024. i fear that despite its intentions to the contrary, if it proceeds, it will end up helping donald trump. >> the republican senator mitt romney of utah. said effectively the same thing, telling the hill unequivocally, quote, the no labels effort would elect donald trump. going on to say, quote, i asked my chief strategist, what it can didn't have to be like in order to draw voters from donald trump as opposed to drying from joe bi

, they just want the label. which is it? >> you're right to say you can't have it both ways. if it is just a label, why do straight people need it to behave responsibly? and if it's more than that, why shouldn't gay people get it, too? of course, it's not just a label. because tomorrow in an equally historic case, the supreme court's going to decide the constitutionality of the federal defense of marriage act. the there marriage is not a label. if you're not validly married, which gay people are not allowed to be for federal purposes, then your spouse cannot get benefits, tax benefits, can't live on a military base if your spouse is gay. so it may be a label in california, but it's not at all a label for federal purposes. that's why the analogy is not convincing. >> rev, on that point listening to chief justice roberts' questioning on that, that's something a lot of conservatives think. people who are, say, against marriage equality want to know, if you got -- if you have all the rights and benefits, because und

every time nancy jacobs, the head of no labels, and the strategist of no labels are confronted with us, no, it's not what's going to happen. even though their own publicly released polling says that trump would be the one who gains advantage in the electoral college based on their third parties can. and that's what this is. and joe manchin, whether it's ego, audacity, or some other combination of character flaws, as joe said, this is a guy who put money and ego well ahead of the country because the absolute end result of the no labels third party candidate, especially given the stakes, getting on the ballot and, which is a strategic decision on their part, they're going to hurt biden and help trump. >> joe, you ran against trump when he was the sitting incumbent president. he's out of office now. he has led republicans during the midterms and everywhere else, through loss after loss after loss, for at least under performances in the past, three different elections, now, he's under a bunch of different indictments. we may see something out of georgia. he's got to at the federal level an

will talk about no labels later in the show.ant to make sure we talk about the axios focused group from the swing voters among other things, blaming the gop for the failed border bill. voters for trump in 2016, biden in 2020, and the good news for democrats, alexi, it seems like the president's state of the union address helped reorient them if they are angry about inaction in washington, d.c., then they need to place that anger at the feet of the republicans, which would seem to me to offer democrats a pretty clear path forward, which is you have to be connecting the dots for these voters. you have to be helping them understand who in washington is holding up progress on a number of issues. >> i love the focus groups that axios does. i used to lead them when i was with them. they will decide the elections. they don't have party loyalty, and they are incredibly volatile. what is important from the focus group, they say they understand the republicans and trump are the reason that the border crisis is not being fixed, they also s

let's talk about what no labels says. a split ticket, a republican and a democrat, and aiming for the dissatisfied, disaffected center of this country, the people who say they don't like either party. what are they offering those people specifically in terms of policy? >> let me say as ali was finishing her last answer to you, there was a huge round of applause, and i wanted to join in it. i think ali was doing an excellent job. i agree with the crowd behind us. as far as no labels goes, look, what they're offering to people is an alternative. what's not entirely clear is what that alternative is going to be. will it be west virginia senator joe manchin, former utah governor, john huntsman, both in new hampshire today for this town hall that they're doing. new hampshire is a great state if you're looking for nonparty affiliated people. there are a lot of non-party affiliated people in new hampshire. while we have heard from people over and over again on the campaign trail and recent elections and polls show that people ar

okay, vaughn, what more can you tell us about no labels pursuit of chris christie? of left the door open there in his concession speech there in which he said he was going to do everything he possibly could to make sure donald trump is not in the white house ten months from now. well, he clearly does not intend to vote for donald trump, didn't say anything about joe biden, and that's where the view from no labels is that potentially chris christie could be open to joining what would be their bipartisan third party presidential ticket. and so for, you know, no labels, they have spent tens of millions of dollars to gain ballot access around the country for this possible third party ticket. in the scenario, it's joe biden versus donald trump. we have seen polling suggest that a great share of americans want a third option and i'm told that no labels views chris christie as a viable option because he is already well known across the country, h a record on d would be willing, he has a personality to take on dorump i want you to listen to joe lieberman talking about wain

the stakes are high with no labels.re high, michael. what do you put into this, not only the fact they say don't want to be a spoiler. but jacobson repeatedly declined to give a metric on anything involved in whether to run or stand down. politically, do you believe that there is a lane here and it couldn't be a lane, that ultimately, as some people theorize, could put donald trump back in the white house? >> well, to me, the only lane they're operating in is the ego lane. and there's really no metric in as vaughn has laid out numerous different times, there's really no metric available right now that show the path for a no labels-type candidate to succeed in this moment. i'm all for multiparties in this country. i think we benefit from this. but i think the american public looks at this as a very dark choice between a party led by biden which say pro-democracy party and stay party led by donald trump which seems to be a pro-autocracy party. 80% of the country is satisfied making that choice. only 20% of the country dis

you have been critical, to be fair, of no labels. what do you make of their promise?n't understand their promise. if joe biden was out way ahead, maybe it would make sense to have a third candidate. when it's close is what we're worried about. that's where no labels could be a spoiler. i think it's important to say, i am a moderate. i'm one of the people that the cochair was talking about that is for bipartisanship. i was a moderate republican, i have left the party over trump. i would support centrist candidates a lot of times, maybe even third-party candidates in senate and house races where it makes sense. it does not make sense in a race that donald trump is on the ballot. joe biden is the centrist choice if we get into a hypothetical place where it's joe biden and donald trump. so a centrist third-party candidate would be competing with the existing centrist choice in the race, joe biden, for vote share. you know, for a third-party ticket to actually be meaningful, they would have to take out of the biden vote share, excuse me, out of the trump vote share, and th

. >> the country of origin label labelling program. >> a vote tomorrow in congress about a new trade treaty could lead to lower u.s. inspection standards for shrimp coming in from southeast asia. >>> we start tonight with major developments on fast track trade authority for president obama. it would provide president obama with the authority to finalize the trans pacific partnership, it would then head to congress for a simple up or down vote with no debate. moments ago, ohio congresswoman slammed fast track on the house floor. >> i find it hard to imagine a more dangerous or irresponsible approach than fast tracking another trade deal through congress. tpa, the authority to fast track is the gateway to the trans pacific partnership, both will further harm workers and communities to a faster global race to the bottom. with more outsourcing of jobs more lowered wages, more dropping benefits more lowered standards for worker safety and compensation. we've seen that since nafta passed 30 years ago. >>> there are some key bills that must be approved. one of them is the trade enforcement

it's supposed to focus in on not having this label. something very similar to what you are discussing pass an option with the house leadership. >> if donald trump was serious -- which i don't think he is -- then because at one time just the other day he's taking credit for partisanship saying that -- >> this he led the battle to get mccarthy out. >> so now what the no labels group wants to do is to try to get folks together. so let's try to do that. i don't necessarily disagree with him because not all issues are democratic or republican but have to be compromised. when we have to listen to the american people, there are american people on both sides. we should be listening to all of the people in congress and trying to come up with a compromise that moves the nation forward so our middle class, our poor can prosper the way we have in the past. that's what we need to do and focus on that opportunity. it's there. >> congressman meeks, thank you. >>> coming up, criminal charges could still be filed against the rookie officer who killed 1

listen, there's -- i believe that gmos should be labeled.ble to have a decision what i serve my guests in my restaurant. but as a father, what i serve my children. we're not asking to get rid of them, we just want them labeled. i started an action that went up 24 hours ago, and so far we have 70,000 signatures. this is done through frito.com. the overwhelming majority of people want the gmos labeled. there may not be any conclusive health issues associated with the gmos. but if you look at the soil, and placing products on these crops and wiping out everything, and now have bugs resistant to phosphates, and you need to add more powerful products in the environment. >> there are crops that have been genetically modified, and it addresses the goal that you care about, about hunger. >> the argument is that it increases yield, and there's a lot of evidence saying that it doesn't increase yield at all. that yields actually through other types of farming are actually as good, if not better. so it's a somewhat disingenuous. also, there was a rice l

. >> i'm tired of being labelled.'m an american, not an african american. >> oh, girl, twitter will be on fire. >> what? i'm sorry. >> what did you just say? stop, stop tape right now. >> what do you think? tweet us. "conversation nation" is ahead. [ hoof beats ] i wish... please, please, please, please, please. [ male announcer ] the wish we wish above all...is health. so we quit selling cigarettes in our cvs pharmacies. expanded minuteclinic, for walk-in medical care. and created programs that encourage people to take their medications regularly. introducing cvs health. a new purpose. a new promise... to help all those wishes come true. cvs health. because health is everything. in life there are things you want to touch and some you just don't. introducing the kohler touchless toilet. ♪ >>> the first lady on the campaign trail in madison, wisconsin, and holdingvg nothin back. >>> plus, wait until you see this one. speaker boehner reveals his jobs plan. well, sort of. >>> and raven simone's interview with oprah draws

frankly the main audience of no labels right now is the national press corp the main audience of no labelsegadonor's. you want to make sure that they understand that they are not buying into the problem solvers caucus. or some of the centrist fantasy. they are buying into the reelection donald trump. >> they are making a very clear to folks, particularly in the beginning of this campaign. in the press, and the second wave of this is gonna be even more direct about the ties between the republican party and the intentions of mark penn and nancy jacobsen will run no labels. >> one international poll from monmouth found that 30% of americans say they would consider voting for a unity ticket made of a republican and a democrat. but when given a specific option, i would take it with senator joe manchin, and former republican governor john huntsman, just 2% said they would vote for that option. is it name recognition, is it the people agreeing with the concept but not when it gets too close for comfort with the specifics? >> i think you just hit on the head. it is, the nominal or notional idea of

how to shed this label of racist. the risk for trump is the pejorative that has long dogged him becomes defining. how is it that the president's surprised by this label, considering the things that he is willing to say in public? >> yeah, that's a good question. i'm not sure he is so surprised by it as much as he is just angry about it and frustrated that he is being called a racist. it's not just a political label that his democratic opponents are using. it's actually the truth right now. i mean, the tweets that he had, the attacks he had against the four congresswomen of color were plainly racist as have a number of comments that he's made and actions he's taken for decades now in his career as a real estate mogul, as sort of a celebrity, reality television host, and now as a politician and president. so the trouble here is that this language continues and it continues in such a sort of heightened way with world focus that this label becomes defining. it becomes part of who he is as he seeks re-election. and that's

a no labels candidate will not win in this polarized country. no labels might get 20%.idence from polling to history, suggests that more of that 20% will come from joe biden than donald trump, trump supports, more committed, in centrists will be seduced into voting for someone younger than joe biden, what looks like a centrist ticket and it could defeat joe biden and it is not responsible cen terrorism, it is not responsible moderation to elect donald trump. >> and bill, i know you already met with no labels and tried to make this argument. you also on the democratic side have rfk jr., a democratic presidential candidate, pushing covid conspiracy theories. last week in a video obtained by "the new york post," he said some things that are raising eyebrows. let's show that. >> covid-19 there's no argument it is ethnically targeted. covid-19 attacked certain races. covid-19 is targeted to attack caucasians and black people. the people who are most immune are [ inaudible ] chinese. >> so jews and chinese people, supposedly more immune from covid. tweeted "the new york post"

that's about that mission of no labels was. they don't want -- they are not interested in voting for joe biden or donald trump. so, there is a lane. there's no question that they have to figure out how to fill that need. there is a demand out there, but whether or not there are going to supply the answer, i'm not sure. >> do you see no labels being anything more than a spoiler candidate, if they do run someone? i mean, it's not you, not joe manchin, if it's not nikki haley, who could it be that would actually stand a chance to defeat -- joe biden or donald trump? >> that's a great question. look, i think there is a frustrated majority out there that is larger than there are people on either side, that would like to see this possibility. i think there's more of a chance of it than ever before in our country's history. however, you make a good point. it's one of the tough decisions i had to make. there was a lot of talk and interest in me potentially being the presidential nominee for no labels. i did not, for myself, see that th

three states connecticut, maine and vermont have mandatory ge labeling laws. more than 70 bills have been introduced across the country in more than 30 states trying to require labeling. the food right to know act is aiming to make a federal requirement that companies would have to let consumers know exactly what's this the box they're purchasing. also with us tonight, chef ka lick owe and host and judge of the new bravo series "best new restaurant." congressman, give me the upside of this. why is this that the democrats and i say democrats because i only saw one republican, i believe it was from arkansas in the house who was in favor of this. what is the upside here? >> well i've seen much higher polling numbers consistently on the fact that people want to know what sh in their food and make an informed decision. 64 countries around the world require this including the entire european union. earlier today i brought a hershey bar wrapper that said made in the usa. contains organisms from sugar beets and corn. but we're hearing that it's impossible to do that.

this, because i want to talk about no labels.idering running a so-called bipartisan unity ticket for president in november. all sorts of critics, think that third party candidate like this could hand the election to donald j trump. and, tonight, we have an 11th hour exclusive. a real regarded center left think tank is sounding the alarm about this plan. tomorrow, it is sending a message, a memo -- excuse me, to wall street leaders who are potentially big donors, and the business community. we've got a first look. it reads, in part, we urge prospective donors to do the same due diligence they would do with any investment. why? because despite no labels, high minded claims, the experts who don't work for them had determined their effort is doomed. >> joining me tonight, matt bennett, former white house deputy assistants and democratic strategist, he's now executive vice president for public affairs at third way. matt, i appreciate you coming here and talking about this with us. why is your organization, think you have to send this

what has unfollowedded with nafta, the country origin of labeling isn't going to make it. and now you've got the secretary tom vilsack saying the congress has to change this law so the united states can adhere to this trade rule. i know this is big with ranchers and farmers and of course the food industry in this country. where do you stand on this senator? >> i mean this is crazy, ed. i mean this is why you need fair trade, not free trade. listen i heard the previous segment we had talked about food being labeled, coming from the united states. and they found that to be illegal. what is wrong with that? it's amazing to me that we're going to let an organization outside of the united states world trade organization tell us that a law that congress passed that was signed by a republican president in 2008 is illegal. that's crazy and it's what's wrong with these trade agreements. they don't allow for countries

it's just about the label. >> the label marriage means something even our opponents -- >> sir, if you tell a child that somebody has to be their friend, i suppose you can force the child to say this is my friend. but it changes the definition of what it means to be a friend. and that's it seems to me what supporters of proposition 8 are saying here. all you're interested in is the label and you insist on changing the definition of the label. >> well, the debate is playing out in the nation's editorial pages as well. nelson lund rights in "the wall street journal" about overturning prop 8, "the justices are unlikely to take some momentous step unless they're persuaded that granting the new right to same sex couples will not harm children or ultimately undermine the health of our society." and dana mill bank writes, "the most they can do is delay the inevitable." let's bring in jonathan gapehart. you've written a lot about. this what is your immediate take from yesterday? >> i have to agree with dana millbank. anything the court decides in this case is going to slow down the inevitable.

our label says it. your grass proves it. get ortho weed b gon. the label tells the story. female announcer: want your best rest ever? then don't miss sleep train's best rest event. you'll find sleep train's very best mattresses at the guaranteed lowest price. plus, pay no interest for three years on beautyrest black, stearns & foster serta icomfort even tempur-pedic. and rest even better with sleep train's risk-free 100-day money back guarantee. get your best rest ever from sleep train. ...guaranteed! ♪ sleep train ♪ ♪ your ticket to a better night's sleep ♪ >>> at this hour a massive manhunt is underway for two convicted murders who escaped from an upstate new york prison. men were serving life sentences. they pulled off an elaborate and daring operation sometime between friday night and yesterday morning. ever since they have been on the run. john yang is live near that prison in new york. that's not far from the canadian border. so john absolute top level security here. these two guys inned a they cut through steel walls and made their way through essentially steam tunn

and they are all about giving money to no labels. they love the idea of it.he idea of a third party is great, but the reality does not seem to have the ability to execute. >> stephanie, the one thing i say about politics, people say well is not going to happen because it's never happened before. and then it happens. we will never elect a black president, we will never elect an actor president or a real estate millionaire from new york. the idea behind this is to simply pave the road for the possibility. if we get to next may and it is a break glass and take case of emergency. emergency would be not to help trump but to be in a situation where trump was up 15 points over biden, who may have had a health crisis or some god forbid that happens, that is what happens when you're 80 years old. so we have to discuss the possibilities. so it is simply laying the tracks. because you cannot decide next june if there is an emergency to do something about them, it then because you have to get on the ballot in enough states to get a third party going. and this is not a pr

here is an existing label and here is the proposed new label.ce most people eat far more than the current label suggests. producers would also have to include added sugars to the list. along with potassium and individual d and daily values for sodium and fiber would be revised. >> that is important to me because a lot of times i don't have time to look at all of the nutrients on a label. >> reporter: advocates no crazy in labeling saying the changes are long overdue. >> the kind of foods we are eating is causing a lot of illness and premature deaths among americans. the food label can help guide us towards healthier foods. >> reporter: it's all part of a michelle obama's push to encourage families to make healthier food choices. >> folks are really starting to think about what they eat and how active they are, so they are scrutinizing labels and they are asking questions and they are changing what they feed their families. >> reporter: this morning the grocery manufacturers association says it's time for label changes but they should be based on

i want to be labeled a human who loves human. i'm tired of be labeled. i'm not an african-american.here my root go to to. i don't know how far back they go. i don't know how far back. and i don't know what country in africa i'm from. but i know my roots are in louisiana. i'm an american. and that's a colorless person. because we're all people. l i have lots of things running through my veins. >> after hearing raven-symone self identify as an american and outright reject being labeled an african-american or gay, oprah shared the following reaction with many of her viewers. >> oh, girl, you starting up twitter on fire. what? oh, good lord! what did you just say? stop, stop, stop the tape right now. >> and set the twitter on fire she did. while some twitter users supported raven's request not to be labeled, others were bothered tweeting she was rejecting her heritage or appearing ignorant about race and sexuality. if raven set twitter on fire, she also set media outlets in the blogosphere. they rejected her comments calling her views about racial labels blind or infuriating. on wednesd

all you're interested is the label and you insist on changing the definition of the label. >> it's like saying you can vote, you can travel, but you cannot be a citizen. there are certain labels in this country that are critical. you could have said in the loving case, you can't get married, but you can have an interracial union. everyone would know that was wrong. >> john roberts and ted olson arguing about whether this "marriage" label means something, or if you can have first-class citizenship while the state still bans you from having that label, that one thing. if you wanted to know today if there was any good old fashioned homophobic ignorance in the court, yes, there was, on the wings of a dove named antonin scalia. he was trying to help out the lawyer arguing the anti gay rights side. he starts out trying to help the lawyer and goes right off the cliff. >> mr. cooper, let me give you one concrete thing. why don't you mention some concrete thing. if you redefine marriage to redefine same-sex couples, you must per adoption of same-sex couples and there is considerable disagreement

our label says it. your grass proves it. get ortho weed b gon. the label tells the story.ong control of all these household bugs - roaches, ants, and spiders. spectracide gives you year long control... of just roaches. their label says so. got more than roaches moving in? get home defense. the label tells the story. >> the clock is ticking. just three weeks to go before the pariot act expires. the debate became more pointed on thursday when a federal appeals court struck down the nsa's massive surveillance program. unanimously ruling that the bulk collection is not authorized by the pariot act. democratic senator and patrick who are refused to renew the pariot act unless it includes new provisions. started the leader to lead a formittable contention who are dead set on letting the collection of phone records continue. >> according to the cia had these authorities been in place. they would have likely have prevented -- >> one day. >> better not be. this congress failed to authorize a program that we know about. >> it is illegal? >> i was very pleased and of course i am not

a warning label, a digital label that would appear regularly when you use social media, that would helpe wonder, do they work? we have years of experience from tobacco and alcohol labels that actually tell us, these labels are effective in increasing people's awareness and driving behavior change. they need to be accompanied by other policy measures as well. >> doctor, one of the things i think about is, in many ways social media has changed people's brains and it's changed people's way of thinking. right? there's no need to go to original source materials anymore. you go and ask, what time was this -- there's no -- even the concept of how we think, it has changed. is that something you think we are condemned to live in? >> it's such a question because you are absolutely right that social media has changed some fundamental things aboutinterac another. think about our relationship with one another. we are having a conversation. we're not in the same room but looking at each other's faces. we recognize each other's tone of voice as well as a content of what we are saying. what social medi

>> the label is -- >> same-sex couples have every other right, it's just about the label. >> the labeleans something. it's like to say you can vote, you can travel, but you may not be a citizen. they are certain labels that are very, very critical. >> in the case of today's argument on doma, the marriage labeling could not be more crucial. section 3 of the 1996 23er8 law defining marriage as strictly between a man and a wo prohibit legally wed same-sex couples from receiving many of the same federal benefits as straight married couples. ediwindsor, her case is before the court. she had to pay $363,000 in federal estate tax when is her spouse the aeismt spire died in 2009. she would have been exempt from those taxes if the law recognized her as the next of kin. bill clinton signed doma under pressure from republicans in 1996. "new york times" report that mr. clinton was unwilling to risk his reelection by vetoes it. earlier this morning, he acknowledged the blemish, saying that doma was a relic from an earlier era while its time has passed. today's d opt ma arguments certain same-sex co

does not require products to be labelled fw mo or non-gmo. senate requires labels on all genetically modified food. it could head to the governor as soon as next week. while in d.c. a bill is making the rounds that would make the fda the only entity that could require labels, which basically a way to preempt legislation ix like the legislation in vermont. in our latest article for the washington examiner, politics writer and friend of the show betsy woodruff examines the issue. she joins us at the table. >> absolutely. tell us what's going in vermont? what's motivate this push? is this a real health concern that's behind this, or why the labels? >> large question of whether or not genetically modified organisms needs to be labels here is a huge issue, and it shouldn't shiz every surprise us that vermont is the state that's gotten the closest of having the labels required. are these foods dangerous, and do they deserve to literally be stigmatized or marked? seems like overwhelmingly the voters in vermont believe that they do, but in d.c. obvio

this no label strategy is not that.in favor of a republican nominee. >> can i ask you about that? you bring up an important point. they look at our country with 330 billion people with its diversity and, say you have to whittle this down to two political parties as a binary choice. it's frustrating. what's, how do you make america a more multi party system effectively and meaningfully so you are not left with this argument every four years. don't be a spoiler candidate. the intentions, perhaps, of somebody advancing, you know, a third way, a third party is not automatically shut down on the idea that you're just acting as a spoiler. >> right, well, move on works with organizations out there that do this work of building real third-party political power out there in the states. the working families party is one of them. and it is based in a strategy of how you actually when being on the ballot in those states and have people behind that. this is a dark money funded effort there isn't -- make no label strategy. they are n

it must have a label showing where the beef was produced. world trade organization ruled on monday the requirement violates nafta. this has caused an uproar who demonstrate how free trade can affect u.s. law. house republicans work quickly to repeal the law. it could be from brazile or argentina or southeast asia and have no idea where it came from. as montana senator john tester point pointed out, will see that usda seal to see it's american meat and it's not. this comes at a bad time for president obama as he pushes the tpp. senator elizabeth warren has been citing examples after examples, such as origin of labeling suit in her fight against the tpp. she released a report this week showing united states has a terrible track record on enforcing labor laws. let's go to baltimore where marilyn mosby gives us an update on the freddie gray new video on death. >> circumstances surrounding the tragic incident with the death of freddie gray. may 1st our investigation revealed we had sufficient probable cause to bring charges against six police off