opportunities in san francisco. >> is that oewd and the authority? >> the event authority hartman studios and the olse. >> olse. >> all parties are committed to ensuring compliance with prevailing wage requirements on the upcoming america's cup main event this summer. the event authority has been informed that the olse is available to answer any questions that bidder may have at this point regarding the prevailing wage requirements. and the oewd will provide a pre-construction meeting with olse and the contractors to review the applicable prevailing wage rates before any work begins. while it's challenging to apply prevailing wage rates and prevailing wage requirements to a privately funded temporary event of this kind, it can be done and our office is committed to making this summer's events a success. >> thank you. do you see the penalties, they actually will or will not be levied? >> the penalty discussion is, as i understand it, is still ongoing and we're hopeful that there will be some compensation to the city for our enforcement costs. >> okay.

we ensure that every subcontractor who is going to perform covered work and the event authority and oewd are clear what is covered work, meaning covered by the prevailing wage requirements, that they all understand their obligations. and both are paying the correct wage rate and for reporting it and maintaining certified payroll records to provide to the city to show that they paid it. ~ >> thank you. it's not just for future america's cup events. we have a number of events that are coming to the -- projects coming to the port. [speaker not understood] as well who made commitments around prevailing wage, local hire, that we need to use our experience here which i wish we didn't have to. we already have in place to inform how we actually do the implementation and enforcement in the future. >> point well taken. it will be a little less challenging with a major construction contract because contractors will be familiar with prevailing wage requirements. >> okay, thank you. like to call back up mr. martin. my concern, mr. martin, is that, you know, we have had long discussionses about we wan

if that hasn't been done, i'll collect that data so our oewd, mr. mulligan, can have that data and hopefully even enhance that going forward. ~ >> thank you. >> mr. barkley, thank you very much. i think what you present here is very compelling in terms of the department participation. if what we have is right, the data is very strong. as well as your commitment to local business inclusion as well. i think on the city side we need to be doing a better job of informing and communicating and end tracking that as well. and that's something that has fallen through the tracks. it helps us to make sure in the future we're doing the best we can in this regard. future folks like yourself who are doing work here would not be going through what you're going through now. >> thank you very much. >> thank you. next up i'd like to call up solama jokunu from contract compliance. and she is going to be discussing how the city is that -- the authority and the americas' cup has made our subject seclusion qualities and make sure we're following and tracking that. >> go

levin mentioned would be paid to oewd in support of apprenticeship opportunities in the city. >> thank you. i think it's important for me to reiterate that i supported this project because of the concessions made. at the time the concessions were made, i pressed my appreciation for them. when it comes to actually carrying out the construction and set up of the facilities, i would expect that they actually get carried out. and that's not too much to ask. my disappointment about that is somewhat great. and i know that we now have learned how we can perhaps do things better in the future, but it's -- you know, people like me who have to approve projects like this, it's a very difficult place because we work really hard to get the best we can, to get concession like this that help overall san franciscans that don't get carried out. and i feel like people have not been communicating in good faith. even when we do it in the public place like this. so, i am very happy that we have this conversation to know that we actually are going to move forward and make things better. but, you know, i'm u

oewd local hiring. >> our plan is to have it on the next quarter report to get a summary on how they are doing and explaining the program to you. >> great, thank you. commissioner adam? >> i want to say thank you for your presentation. but i would like to know more so maybe when they present next time. i know these numbers can be fudged a little bit this way. i would like to know how to numbers are broken down. so when they make the presentation in the next couple months they can explain it to me. >> sure. >> thank you very much for the report. i think again it seems the consensus from my colleagues as we do like to keep track of our or contractors are doing and we are also aware of how they are doing in terms of local higher and that is something very important to us. not obl only for the contractors we have but if they should come up in future projects we are very proud of our efforts to improve local higher. >> thank you. it's been said. thank you very much. >> item 12, new business. >> any public comment on new business. >> okay, the only item for new business, i think it might b

having individuals like -- one of the board members spoke earlier about having oewd focusing on this. all this matters when you're trying to work collaborative late. part of the problem in the past has been people working in individual silos and not sharing information and focusing collectively on what we are trying to get done. we want to grow the numbers. we want and i like to understand it -- to understand. i think it is great that so many people are here, that we have invigorated leadership from the and bigger -- the entertainment commission and the work that king is doing. i looked out in the audience and i see alcohol and beverage control here. all of the players are at the table in order to move the ball forward. i am encouraged, and the mayor personally wanted to welcome all of you here, and hope that the work continues to get done so that we could continue to make san francisco the premier city that people want to come to to visit, to shop, to spend money, to eat, and to be entertained. he wanted me to personally mention that he enjoys all of the activities associated particu

second is to answer a speakers earlier point [inaudible] report published by oewd that showed that it was actually 7 percent below engineers estimates and 2012 actually showed [inaudible] and third and finally it's important to bring all the trades together to make sure that local hire works for the school district and for the students and families that benefit from this policy. thank you. >> i'm a part of [inaudible] and i'm not really all about statistics and all that because i've been working all my life and i'm 54 and i'm from san francisco and i didn't go to all your high schools 'cause i went through the pen. and all these kids that you talking about -- i think you using these kids because the only schools i see -- you may not like what i say, but all the schools i see are white kids, hindu kids -- ya'll know about the history of san francisco about 66 over there when they shot up them brothers over there for trying to stand up. you get rid of the brothers. if you really cared about the kids you would find a way to get the fathers back to the house. i got a 16-year-old daughter

rich over here, oewd, planning, thank you for resuscitating this project, to coin a medical term. but i mean really two world class hospitals for the residents of the city and county. and work force opportunities for young men and women through our construction apprenticeship programs for young men and women in all of the entire city. so, thanks once again, and we look forward to you approving the term sheet today. thank you. >> thank you. next speaker. >>> michael lion, gray pan theyx and also a member of the coalition. we have come a long way. st. luke's looks more viable. cathedral hill looks more manageable but there are serious questions that remain, not only about the cpmc itself, but also how that deals affects the rest of the health system in san francisco. how is the rest of the city going to care for some 5,000 more medical patients -- medi-cal patients that we anticipated? how are we going to have enough skilled nursing facility beds? how many psych bed do we need? how are costs going to be contained? we need to have a continuing community advisory group that can contin