u.k. and the u.s. are suffering from an understandable sense of fatigue and caution after iraq and afghanistan. it is obvious the ground intervention is out of question in the foreseeable future. but the libya experience shows us the limits of winning wars from the air and syria shows us that very often things get worse, not better when we fail to intervene at all. i am talking about overall policy, not just the military. we do need to construct a -- some new models of intervention and we should do this collaboratively with the u.s. and france. the u.s. administration worries about the debates on identity which we are having here in the u.k.. that made their position very clear on the issue of british membership in the european union. their interest is in an active internationalist economically liberal u.k. which is influencing the european union from the inside. our influences are the lessons years ago and that worries people in washington. watching the be scottish referendum campaign closely, too. th

u.s. needs allies in this world and the u.k. is still the closest and most globally capable ally that the united states has. it does not diminish key relationships. the u.s. government supported the u.s. give it toward the asia-pacific -- the u.k. government supported the pivot toward the asia-pacific region two years ago. we have our own british pivots to the east and the south reflecting a shift in economic power. that is right for america and it is right for the u.k., but some clarity is needed. the u.s. will remain a global power with enduring interest in the middle east. that was not properly understood at the time. on the u.k. side, we need to work out how are asia-pacific is overwhelmingly commercial or whether there are political security and economic policy elements to it as well. the u.s. would welcome europeans working with them i believe the u.k. will be a more attractive and influential partner around the world with emerging powers if it is seen to have a strong relationship with the united states. i believe the foun

u.k. and u.s. at the popular level, the level where people with an interest in foreign policy, i think there is quite a shared set of views about the world we are in after afghanistan. i think public opinion is the same way, in the same direction, so i do not see the house of commons vote as having a negative impact on u.k.-u.s. relations, and that accounted for the president says the tatian and uncertainty in the policy. the long term would not be affected. you do not think it was just being polite? think so.o not i think actually for both countries, there is a long-term issue about taking action in the world and whether we are going to remain actively involved in world affairs. i do not mean from that amazed apple boots on the ground answer to the world's problems, but are we going to be actively involved, and that often involves the security and the political element as well as the traditional economic ties in world affairs, and i think there is a question about that in britain, whether our poli

so i f believe that the foundatn that the u.k./u.s. shipp remain remains extremist on but if you just want to mention in conclusion three headwinds. first of all, both the uk and u.s. are both suffering from an understandable sense of fatigueq an and caution after iraq and afghanistan, and it's obvious the ground interventions are out of question for the foreseeable future. but olivia experience shows us the limits of winning wars in the air, and syria shows that very often things get worse, not better, when we failed to intervene at all. i'm talking aboutnn overall policy, not just military options. so we do need to construct some new models of intelligence thislvement in do this collaboratively with the united states. secondly, the u.s. administration worries about thn debates on identity which we're having here in the uk. they have made their position very clear on the issue of british mentorship of thes in ac european union.ti their interest is in an active,y internationalist, economic, economically liberal uk which is influencing t

u.k. and ,he u.s. at a popular level there is quite a shared set of views in the world we are in after afghanistan. the house of commons vote as having a negative vote on the u.k.-u.s. relations. the u.s. was in the same boat. their relationship would not be affected. >> i do not think so. for both countries, there is a long-term issue about the appetite to take action in the world and whether we are going to remain actively involved in world affairs. i do not mean a simple boots on the ground answer to the world's problems, but are we going to be actively involved. -- actively involved? there is a question mark about that in britain, whether our political leadership has the stomach for those decisions and issues for the future. in thell come through next parliament. america is going through much the same debate. feels that we are in a transition, the shape of the post second world war open -- order is breaking down. is thereof uncertainty in both countries. it came as a surprise to the u.s. was the fa

u.s. budget deficit worse and same phenomena in japan and the u.k. here's a story cody hails recovery ok as unemployment fills mark already the new central bank are here and they. u.k. jobs market has not yet recovered as inflation has now outstripped wages for four years right how can you have a recovery and have this at the same time to market if you can i mean the real wages are going down if the cost of living is going up and your wages even if they're flat in real terms you're worse off if wages are actually going down you're much worse off so there's no recovery there are carnies commissaire other day about you know maybe we'll raise interest rates in late two thousand and fifteen in the computer business there's something called vaporware that's when you make an announcement there's no there there there's no substance behind it this is the central bank equivalent of vaporware where it's corning about one point it's going to be two years from now all the central banks are experimenting we're just getting pigs in their experiment at the idea tha

u.s. budget deficit worse same same phenomena in japan and the u.k. here's a story corps he hails recovery ok as unemployment fills mark already the new central bank are here and they. u.k. jobs market has not yet recovered so as inflation has now outstripped wages for four years right how can you have a recovery and have this at the same time to market if you can is a real wages are going down if the cost of living is going up and your wages even if they're flat in real terms you're worse off if wages are actually going down you're much worse off so there's no recovery there are carnies commissaire other day about you know maybe we'll raise interest rates in late two thousand and fifteen in the computer business is something called vaporware that's when you make an announcement there's no there there there's no substance behind it this is the central bank equivalent of vaporware where it's carney now about one point it's going to be two years from now all the central banks are experimenting we're just getting pigs in their experiment at the idea that

exchanges -- u.k.-u.s. exchanges during the conflict. ,econdly, maybe more recently the issue was reached by the united states itself. u.s. mind isthe whether the early release of top-level exchanges between prime ministers and presidents were matters of war and peace. if they are released well ahead of the normal time in the political lifetimes of the people who are involved, would of thefect the nature trust and confidence in each other for future presidents and prime ministers and make them less likely to stick to each in futureidentially crises? i think that issue might legitimately be a risk. is yes.nal view on the sort of issue where you are talking about the most fundamental issues. i don't want to terribly get with you.r direct i realize it will be a contrary view. -- there may are well be a knock on effect in the future. given that our country does derive advantage from the tandoor -- from the candor of american administrations, we american administrations derive value from our tandoor towards them

u.s. and u.k. the u.s. government likes to keep its secrets secret. one of the norms of international relations is that private communications between leaders stay private. it wouldn't be a surprise if the u.s. you was sensitive about these documents being released. i haven't seen any specific evidence of direct communications between the u.s. and u.k. on this issue. >> this has been going on four years now, how significant is the impact? >> it's hugely significant. the eninquirey represents our best chance to learn the lessons from the iraq war and to move on. i think it's really time we were able to do that now. >> all right, really good to talk to you. >> thank you very much. >> we have the latest news from europe. >> coming up, we've got all the sport on news hour. there's mania in mumbai, witness a tar player plays his final match. stay with us. journalism, and we fill that void... >> there is a huge opportunity for al jazeera america to change the way people look at news. >> we just don't parachute in on a story...quickly talk to a couple of exp

u.k. the u.s. and europe have ripped one point six trillion dollars this comes when people are suffering austerity is because one point six trillion dollars according to city am was ripped out of their bank accounts and given to suicide bankers with derivatives strapped to their vests do you know derivative vests that explode it with financial weapons of mass financial destruct. thanks to guys like mark carney janet yellen ben bernanke one point six trillion in financial explosives exploded in the face of people all over these confidence and now they're a lot poorer for it is getting worse that's the problem see you have entered our who used to be a fed officials doing the bond buying schemes for the fed and he's saying that this is a disaster for main street but when you see the amount of money the governments are making and then they become addicted to it just like saudi arabia becomes addicted to high oil prices they cannot suffer any oil prices lower than eighty because of all their schemes tha

u.k. the u.s. and europe have ripped one point six trillion dollars this comes when people are suffering austerity is because one point six trillion dollars according to city am was ripped out of their bank accounts and given to suicide bankers with derivatives strapped to their vest you know derivative vest that explode it with financial weapons of mass financial destruct. thanks to guys like mark carney janet yellen ben bernanke one point six trillion in financial explosives exploded in the face of people all over these confidence and now they're a lot poorer for it is getting worse that's the problem see you have and you house are who used to be a fed officials doing the bond buying schemes for the fed and he's saying that this is a disaster for main street but when you see the amount of money the governments are making and then they become addicted to it just like saudi arabia becomes addicted to high oil prices they cannot suffer any oil prices prices lower than eighty because of all their sch

u.s. and the u.k. is not affected and therefore it puts the government of david cameron in an awkward position of the having to perhaps block some of that evidence as per washington's decision and it will be a politically embarrassing move to have to do this critics are saying that it is important for the public to be able to know and see this information not least of which because the goal of this for your inquiry is essentially to look back at how the then government british government had ended up making that decision of sending forty five thousand troops to iraq and to learn from those lessons and not make the same mistakes that was the goal and if you don't publish crucial information about the purpose and another thing is that this inquiry has already cost the taxpayers some eight million pounds so if this becomes a new target a watered down version without such crucial information some are saying it will be a total waste of taxpayers' money. and later this hour we'll go live to london and talk t

u.k. are under pressure. u.s. states are trying to take the power into their own hands and not waiting on the white house, congress to come up with comprehensive policy. state lawmakers want to try to find a solution themselves. more than 10 states have passed two dozen privacy laws alone. way to quelld a concerns from the public about surveillance. tooving to a ron -- iran commemorate the u.s. hostage crisis in 1999. >> we have seen anti--american sentiment before. people chanted death to america and burned u.s. flags here. this is striking because at the moment they are trying to mend ties with the u.s. over the nuclear program. this underscores the challenges between hard-liners and moderates within the country. the wall street journal has a he's. they say this could actually throw in talks -- throw talks into jeopardy. in september sanctions were lifted or overturned against the shipping lines for lack of evidence, saying it was linked to the nuclear program. eu governments want to reimpose sanctions, but they

u.s. and u.k. that needs to be investigated - that there are citizens in the countries. was that based on wrongful evidence and, you know, falsified documents. >> when you look at the case, they are political. the government says they are necessary to heel the wounds of the past. they cause massive upheaval in the country. do you think they do bring enough closure to make them worthwhile? >> it doesn't - you are right. but it is kind of one step, because, you know, the trials have been demanded. the trials are on. now, about being political, that is debated. of course the issue is political. the creation of bangladesh was political. my father was killed because of his beliefs. he didn't join the war directly. it was ideological war. and because of that, my father and other intellectuals were picked up and killed during the last day, before, you know, the victory in december. so the issue would still be on. now, what remains to be seen is there's elections coming and we don't know what will happen, the outcome of the elections. there should be a process for the trials to

u.s. and u.k. governments do everything possible to monitor their communications that's why it's all been modern used human couriers we didn't tell the terror as anything they didn't already know we polled people that they didn't already know or ordinary citizens around the world that this spying system is directed not at the terrorists but. so what do you make of the argument that the leak of this information could actually aid terrorists like do you agree with greenwald and what he said on that. no i think yeah i think the most absolutely correct i mean. from what i've read in . you know terrorists and criminals have for quite some time known that they've been targeted surveillance they use a christian and or technology carriers and whatever they can to get around it so i don't think it's new to those both i think it's like remote that it's new to you know law abiding canadian letting americans know that their government agency that is collecting their sensitive private information you know we're

u.k. and u.s. for a minute this week to try and play down these differences saying that the differences between the western powers are actually very narrow first being said by some experts to be a base saving exercise here and of course as we've said you case certainly much more positive start surrounding the talks looking forward to november the twentieth when these talks will be seeing we've heard foreign secretary william hague saying that he's confident that further progress will be made correspondence or a fourth reporting there barbara slavin and there on the expert a she believes the u.s. secretary of state john kerry's latest statement about a united front with france is simply a diplomatic maneuver to try and reduce tensions in the west and come. john kerry is generally quite diplomatic and he wants a deal and if it's france that's in the way he's not going to go out and publicly critic criticize the french he's going to work behind the scenes to try to convince them to sign on now it's ir

u.k. and u.s. foreign ministers will be try and play down these differences saying that the differences between the western powers are actually very narrow first being said by some experts to be a basis saving exercise here and of course as we said you case certainly much more positive start surrounding the talks looking forward to november the twentieth when the. we've heard foreign secretary william hague saying that he is confident that further progress will be made despite the failure of last weekend's talks being largely blamed on france the u.s. insists major powers were more or less united on agreement john kerry says it was iran that rejected the deal something toronto has denied and lord chizik the head of britain's parliamentary group on global security and nonproliferation says there's no point in playing a blame game. i do not myself think that it is sensible to blame anyone at this stage in a very delicate negotiation the french nor the iranians nor the americans that sort of blame gam

u.k. and u.s. foreign ministers really try and play down these differences saying that the differences between the western powers are actually very narrow first being said by some experts to be a basis saving exercise here and of course as we've said to you kate certainly much more positive surrounding the talks looking to force in november the twentieth when the. foreign secretary william hague saying that he is confident that further progress will be made the u.s. has blamed iran for rejecting a deal at last weekend's talks something to rome has denied john kerry insists major powers were more or less united on the green despite earlier claims that it was the french who blocked a breakthrough when i spoke to jonathan steele he's columnist on international affairs for the guardian newspaper and he explained what he sees as the reasons behind france's tough stance. prancer convinced to do ronnie's meddling in a region which was traditionally at least in colonial times under french influence i mean

u.k. and u.s.foreign ministers would he try and play down these differences saying that the differences between the western powers are actually very narrow first being said by some experts to be a basic saving exercise here and of course as we've said the u.k. so certainly much more positive start surrounding the talks looking forward to november the twentieth when the. foreign secretary william hague saying that he's confident that further progress will be made. and despite the failure of last weekend's talks being largely blamed on france the u.s. insists major powers were more or less united on an agreement john kerry says it was iran that rejected the deal southington iran has denied and for more on the situation in iran those talks let's not cross live to a lot how many of chizik head of britain's all party parliamentary group on global security and normal proliferation. have a welcome to aussies great to have you with us so no deal was reached even by all five pointed to considerable progress

u.k. and u.s. foreign ministers were to try and play down these differences saying that the differences between the western powers are actually very narrow first being said by some experts to be a base saving exercise here and of course as we said the u.k.'s certainly much more positive start surrounding the talks looking forward to november the twentieth when those talks will resume we've heard foreign secretary william hague saying that he is confident that further progress will be made on the course one of sarah firth and earlier we talked to barbara slavin the u.s. state department's leading iran expert and a senior fellow at a top u.s. think tank that of the atlantic council and she believes john kerry's latest statement about a united front with france is more likely a diplomatic maneuver to reduce tensions in the western camp. john kerry is generally quite diplomatic and he wants a deal and if it's france that's in the way he's not going to go out and publicly critical criticize the french h

u.s. and u.k. governments do everything possible to monitor communications that's why it's all up in modern used human couriers we didn't tell the terror as anything they didn't already know we polled people that they didn't already know or ordinary citizens around the world that this spying system is directed not at the terrorists but. so what do you make of the argument that the leak of this information could actually aid terrorists like do you agree with greenwald and what he said on that. no i think yeah i think the most absolutely correct i mean. from what i've read in. terrorists and criminals have for quite some time known that they've been targeted surveillance they use encryption and that technology interiors and whatever they can to get around it so i don't think it's new to those both i think it's like remote that it's new to you know law abiding canadian letting americans know that their government agency that is collecting their sensitive private information you know we're talking abou

u.s. and u.k. governments do everything possible to monitor their communications that's why it's all been mobbed used human couriers we didn't tell the terror as anything they didn't already know we polled people that they didn't already know or ordinary citizens around the world that this spying system is directed not at the terrorists but. so what do you make of the argument that the leak of this information could actually aid terrorists like do you agree with greenwald and what he said on that. no i think yeah i think the most absolutely correct i mean. from what i've read in . you know terrorists and criminals have for quite some time known that they've been targeted surveillance they use a christian and that technology and carriers and whatever they can to get around it so i don't think it's new to those both i think it's like remote that it's new to you know law abiding canadian letting americans know that their government agency that is collecting their sensitive private information you know

u.k. and u.s. foreign ministers really try and play down these differences saying that the differences between the western powers are actually very narrow first being said by some experts to be a basis saving exercise here and of course as we've said to you kate certainly much more positive surrounding the talks looking for the forces to make them for the twentieth when they feel. we've heard foreign secretary william hague saying that he is confident that further progress will be made well despite the failure of last weekend's talks being largely blamed on france the u.s. insists major powers were more or less united on an agreement and john kerry says it was a wrong on the rejected the deal something that to wrong has denied it's not cross live to jonathan steele he's following this in international affairs for the international affairs for the guardian newspaper there in london thank you very much indeed for being with us let's just talk about quite obviously few developments over the iran issue

u.s. and the u.k. model you were talking about people what about governments i mean short it basically the problem is not just in the u.s. but throughout the world money is being spent that simply doesn't exist where else are we getting such big debt problems in comparison to what we're seeing in the u.s. . absolutely look the federal government of the united states is running nearly trillion dollar deficits having run trillion plus one thousand billion dollars plus deficits for years part of the thing is the government's a very different situation the general public despite that everybody likes to analogize government said households a similar the government determines more or less how much income it raises by setting its tax rates the average citizen the average business is not in a situation where it could command everyone to pay them a certain amount of revenue or incomes the government sort of slightly different situation governments are mandating policies in other words they're deciding how much t

u.k. have been and german and u.s. diplomatic relations have really hit an extraordinary relations of really has been extraordinary since this since this was revealed and we can expect the same for the u.k. if the ambassador isn't able to provide now as a percentage of the nation and the first test of those relations particularly between the u.s. and germany is coming up next week that's basically trade negotiations between the u.s. and the european union understandably those in now in jeopardy and the european official talking to the guardian newspaper said it's over for us now the u.s. and germany particularly got close to be the e.u. as a whole haven't been doing business on a level playing field so potentially incredibly damaging well indeed must be very embarrassing situation for the countries cagr and hannah doing that and certainly nominees a backdrop for the negotiations between the parties involved laura smith thank you so much for bringing us this update from wanda and from germany's pirate party doesn't think

a survey by forrester research, a 395 executives from the u.s., u.k. and canada found that facebook creates less business value than other marketing opportunities. facebook called the report irresponsible. there were concerns going forward that facebook would continue to grow at its current d pace. they saturated the u.s. market. it's a good problem. but it makes it hard to find the growth here that wall street loves. >> in addition to dig bets on noble. facebook is betting that apps to click and draw others will be a big user. wall street is putting its money where zuckerberg's house is. >> facebook and twitter connect us to the universe in a way we never could imagine. are you too wired? next - a woman whose name is sinnon mouse with social media, she has a message on controlling your social media world. >>> randy zuckerberg has a career most people dream about - the older sister tv facebook's mark zuckerberg. she's the founder and ceo of zuckerberg media - a wife, mother and the author of two books: >> this is a book urging all of us to take time to

more territories and just this island that belong to great britain how many of them are funded by u.s. u.k. taxpayers. but i think there's now fourteen overseas territories which qualify for aid money in varying amounts because those are different kinds of communities with different circumstances pecan is the most extreme example of the most amount of money going to the settlement for each person that lives there and i think will produce tax payers we will be particularly concerned about is that that that sum is getting bigger and bigger only two years ago it was effectively two million pounds a year going to support those fifty people it's now three point six million pounds a year and that's of course before the european money which also comes from british taxpayers is taken into account and we should be looking at ways of helping the island of course but helping them to be more self-sufficient and more self-reliant and actually by sending more and more british taxpayers' money over the exactly the opposite is happening they're becoming more reliant on the british taxpayer and i think peo

u.s. embassy and the u.k. embassy because it's clear for everybody who looks at that big what's going on there but i think that the german interior secret service they are not allowed to investigate on the las and this is simply because germany right now is a subclass part of the b. of the us and they want to become a first class partner so our government is simply selling our privacy and their own privacy to climb up the ladder. also how this hour and best a geisha chance lying on military torture in the us and independent record shows that the fans department and the cia mastermind the abusive treatment doctors and medical staff are in charge of the details. and will an international tribunal lead to the release greenpeace activists detained in russia the dutch motion and the russian reaction in just a few minutes. the day still public services and transport have been crippled by a nationwide strike against tightening hysterically the move coincides with the arrival of the country's international land there

u.k. or the u.s. financial terrorism like we saw r.b.s. the world bank of scotland a couple down a sigh. or were financially terrorized by osborne cameron and royal bank of scotland and that's the point that's the dirty war the dirty wars it's dirty money it's dirty money war so that's why the film at the end of the day lacked a lot of it because it failed to get into the real dirty financial aspect of what these mass extrajudicial murders it's all about the money you know it to think that it's about some kind of a moral deficiency by some group of people is to not understand that sense morella he doesn't trade on the new york stock exchange there is no morality there never will be more reality and so you can't even start from a place of morality you have to start from place of sublime three hundred sixty degree corruption that has no beginning or end it's a mobius strip of corruption and it all goes back to the terrorist of terrorists the central banks and anything less is to then to sell out to joe blow my mind e bay founder pierre oh my god force on a big fat paycheck and not come on