that christopher steele was passing information top bruce ohr.idn't know christopher steele was terminated for talking to the press. didn't know he talked to the price and didn't know he continued to work with christopher steele. i was mostly struck for that. here is the key player who put together the dossier that was responsible for getting the warrant, he didn't know a lot about him? those were his answers yesterday. judge jeanine: he and his lawyer went over all the areas where he could blois contradict himself. but for a case of this significance when he went to the president of the united states to talk about an unverified dossier, from the time that he heard about it, the time that he approved the warrant in the fbi, and he had to do it, you and i both know two or three or four times, he go to the president, talks by the, and never says to his staff, why do we get this from, who is this guy christopher steele. you and i both know from the public information that christopher steele was paid for other information, and was a confidential info

christopher steel was the author of the anti-trump dossier.'s established the dossier was paid for by the dnc and clinton campaign, one of the foundational pieces for the surveillance warrant on a trump campaign aide and mr. comey says no, i don't think so, i don't have any recogniz recollection g told that or reading that or learning that when i was director. he said he believes he learned that information from the media after he left as director but i'm digging further. so number one, there's a big chunk of transcript that certainly has to do with the dossier, its use to secure surveillance warrant hand the director knew about the sourcing of the document and the intelligence officer, the british intelligence officer who put it together. in this case, he's saying he was not aware of the financial relationship with the dnc and clinton campaign. i'll keep reading. this seems inconsistent with what the director said yesterday or at least his statement was somewhat misleading, that the focus of the transcript was on the e-mails. that doesn't app

. >> sean: not even christopher steele believes his own dossier. he's still defending it, get warrants to spy on americans, is that more important? we all know the dossier was and is a debunked lie, comey didn't verify it, nobody verified it. nobody corroborated steele's evidence, steele wouldn't stand by it when questioned under oath in an interrogatory down in great britain even when he said it was salacious and unproven months after the fisa warrant was in place. james comey will sleep well knowing our two tiered justice system will never likely hold him accountable. so too will these liars, people that lied under oath. michael cohen is in trouble. what about cheryl mills or hue ma abedin or bruce ohr, glenn simpson, christopher steele, james clapper, james brennan, andrew mccabe, lois lerner? eric holder? all those lied to authorities. they were never prosecuted. never even investigated in many cases. let's not forget about james comey. remember he lied to congress under oath. i doubt he will get the cohen treatment tonight. then you have the k

by the way, they knew the source was christopher steele.eally just one source but they like to create the impression for the court that there is multiple sources. no, that's circular reporting. to say recap the fbi under president obama, they got a warrant to spy on trump campaign associate carter page at the height of the 2016 election. in order to achieve this feat they had presented the fisa court judge with evidence that we know the fbi knew was sketchy and was not verified and they themselves had doubt about it ever being true. they knew the evidence was bought and paid for by hillary clinton that was withheld from the fisa court judges. the evidence was bolstered with the circular media reporting that the fbi knew christopher steele was behind. but, as we now know, that's not how so-called evidence was presented to the fisa court tonight, the smoking gun evidence that the leadership under fbi committed a complete and total fraud on the fisa courts by presenting the court hillary's bought and paid russian dossier as real intelligence a

. >> sean: you agree uranium one is troublesome, the phony dossier that christopher steele doesn't stand by which became the basis for fisa warrant applications? they bother you? >> they do. but look, i've read the dossier. that it was -- >> sean: ridiculous. >> put together by the clinton campaign, paying millions of dollars for it and used it as a basic for fisa warrants is a troubling thing to me -- >> sean: troubling? >> it is. yeah. >> sean: the guy that wrote it

. >> not even christopher steele believes his own dossier. the bulk of information used to spy on americans? is that a little more important tonight? i'd think it is. we know the dossier was and is a debunked lie. comey never verified it. nobody corroborated steele's so-called evidence. steele himself wouldn't stand by it when questioned under oath in an interrogatory down in great britain. even after it was used to obtain a fisa warrant. even when he said it was salacious and unproven months after they had the fisa warrant in place. james comey, i guess he will sleep well tonight knowing our two-tiered justice system will never hold him accountable. so too will these liars. people that lied under oath. michael cohen is in trouble tonight because of it. what about cheryl mills or uma abedin or bruce ohr, christopher steele, john brennan, andrew mccabe? eric holder? loretta lynch? they all lied to authorities, never pros cuted or investigated. let's not forget about james comey. he lied to congress under oath. i doubt he will get the cohen tre

he did not know that christopher steele ever worked in the congestion with the fusion g.p.s. he did not know they was any connection to the d.n.c. he seemed to suggest that after that was completely irrelevant. >> he didn't know that bruce orr was meeting with christopher steele and that bruce ohr was passing the information to the f.b.i. he didn't know that the key guy christopher steele whose work product used to get a warrant, didn't know a darn thing about the guy. i found that hard to believe. remember, 225 times he said, "i don't know, i don't recall, i can't remember" to the question in the interview on friday. good he is coming back. i have things i want to ask about the comey memos. we will have him back on monday. >> martha: it is interesting that he, he almost seems to think that it is silly. i mean he basically said as much. it's silly or ridiculous or absurd, i think "absurd" was the word to question how the fisa warrant was established. that obviously he sees a deep knead for it so he doesn't care how or why it came about. >> here is what is scary and absurd. he

flynn come back and clear the air. >> what about christopher steele?ecause a lot of what the dossier alleges is a pretty straight forward attempt to cultivate donald trump before he is running for president, really for years, to dangle business opportunities in front of him, to get him to be cooperative, and he becomes cooperative, right? and then the attempt to help him become president is quite extensive. it involves multiple members of his campaign, whether it's carter page or whether it's paul manafort or it's mike flynn or cohen. it's so complicated, but christopher steele seems to be the guy that has the narrative. would you consider recalling him or calling him in front of your committee? >> well, i think we have to understand what this document was. it was early on without complete information, and he didn't have the benefit of a team such as the special counsel. i believe that the steele document is a well done document. i believe it's largely accurate. i believe it was a snapshot taken at the time, and it's incomplete. we need the special cou

as christopher steele reported. said the two sources who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is confidential. that was mcclatchy reporting in april of this year that robert mueller had evidence that michael cohen was in prague for reasons unknown ahead of the election. the report did not explain what form that evidence was in, or how robert mueller got it. and since then, no news agency has published a report matching mcclatchy's story, including nbc news. mcclatchy, for its part, has never retracted its story or changed it in any way. they stood by it. even as they stood alone on it. since then, michael cohen has pleaded guilty to a number of charges, including campaign finance violations that he says he made at the direction of the president. that case was brought by federal prosecutors in new york. michael cohen also pleaded guilty to lying to congress about his efforts on behalf of donald trump to build a trump tower in moscow. that charge was brought by the special counsel, by robert muell

who christopher steele was. who was getting the information from. very basic.ecause especially -- he's a lawyer. at some point you might have to tell the judge where you got this. trish: he's a lawyer and he's pretty well educated. i would think these are common sense questions you would have. doug, one of the things i worry about -- a zillion things go through your head with all of this. but who is to say this christopher steele, who's to say word didn't get out to putin that there is an expert spy compiling a document for the dnc and the hillary clinton campaign, and by the way like it's connected to the fbi. don't forget the guy at fusion gps, his wife was at fusion gps. bruce ohr i'm talking about. there is a chance it could muck things up over there in the united states. i want to know the answer to that, doug, if i were james comey. >> some good points. and one basic point missed here by comey, that's a moral principle as well as justice principle. that you have the right to confront your accuser in court. you can't have -- it's medieval to have anonymous

this is what christopher steel has with respect offering various sources. trump declined various business deals in order to further the kremlin's cultivation. they have accepted a regular flow of intelligence including on his democratic and other political rivals. it describes what nthey were doing keeping in touch with the russians but yet at the same time they were taking these e-mails that were stolen from the democratic national committee and using those to assist the trump campaign and to assist trump getting elected. >> okay. so the similarities we are finding here and what it says to you about the course of the whole investigation. >> yes. if you see or smell smoke there is probably a fire somewhere. it is so complicated but it doesn't take a genius to get that trump wanted to win and there were other people who thought it made sense if they didn't want hillary clinton to win they could help trump win. that's what happened here. there's a relationship around that. >> they lobbied corporations to get retainers. >> after the election. >> yes. >> this i

. >> he didn't know much about christopher steel. i find that hard to believe. >>> john kelly will be leaving at the end of the year. we're announcing who will be announcing john's place. i appreciate his service very much. >> the president responded to the special court's filing denying that he did anything wrong. >> on the mueller situation, we're happy with what we're reading. there's absolutely no collision which is very important. >>> the third year in a row, the black nights of army have won the army matchup ♪ and the home of the brave ♪ ♪ >>> just waiting to talk about this. >> there's only one thing that went well for navy yesterday and it was the coin flip. that's it. they won the coin flip and then it was all down hill. >> three years in a row. i mean we lost 14 years in a row. now a hat trick for army. and 22nd ranked team in the country. >> and you attribute it to plump. >> he was there when he was president-elect. >> you might say i was also there. >> he's like their mascot, according to pete. >> he might be. isn't our p

former national security advisor michael flynn faced earlier today in federal court has christopher steele or anyone associated with his commented on the discrepancies within the dossier and that some of the sort of. accusations has he taken any responsibility for that or said anything not really he kind of pushed back on on answering certain questions in regard to that now the senate committee did refer steel because the reason that the f.b.i. was able to get the warrant for example to listen and to wiretap. on. who was on page on the foreign policy adviser to trumpet page was because of these dossiers in these articles and steal and lie to the f.b.i. and said that he had not had contact with the coffin of the reporters which turns out clearly is not true so he was one of the first to initiate this whole rush to get investigation now is coming out and saying that a lot of the details in the report aren't accurate but again standing by what he said that there's something there that there is some sort of collusion but not being i think completely transparent about what. i mean these are mea

i mean, they are representative government, , and christopher steele was not a u.s. that is in, he was a foreign british subject and he was supplying data to hillary clinton, the clinton campaign for money. and he was feeding it throughout the government. nobody talked about the agents of their and more importantly, in that document there is worry that flynn was working in a way that was unethical with the turkish government, or really with the russian government, but it had no effect because when donald trump came in, when you look at russian sanctions, the oil pulse of the u.s., increasing production, arming the ukraine, attacking russians into syria, or whether it was ending the obama romance with turkey, we were much tougher on turkey in much tougher on russia. finally, if you want to reduce everything and get down to one point, all of these stories, the surveillance, the entire collusion comes back to the christopher steele dossier, and that was the source of the fisa warrant and that was used in part at least to correlate testimonies with surveillance. and we k

there are several outstanding questions in particular with christopher steel, if that was bases for the fisa warrant and application that fbi put forward, how to they know christopher steel was not gathering information from russian agents illegally. >> not only that. if john solomon a reporting today is accurate, this individual, is in serious legal jeopardy, he is in that e-mail chain of communications whereby the doj and fbi recognize how dubious the steel dossier circumstancis,which means, jamew that there was exculpatory evidence that file should never have been used for surveillance warrant, and lied about when they filed steel as an asset of the fbi, they told us he was leaking to the press after we got fisa warrant, john sullivan says that is a lie. kennedy: it was press report that were pieces for -- basis for th fisa warrant that createa circular reasoning, fbi on its face with basic investigation should have scen seen, that thew it the question that i think they should press james comey, on what role did bruce ohr play in this and when. >> absolutely, and have you the fbi inv

he admitted it and, oh, by the way, christopher steele reported on it. >> let me ask you something. ken dilanian said about the dossier from the very beginning, ignore the sex. follow the money. there's some salacious stuff in there about sex acts that your former colleague jim comey had to brief the president on and describe when i interviewed him at the 92nd street y as awkward. do you think the salacious stuff in there distracted from all the substantive financial ties between trump org and russia? >> no question. and that's a really important point. the dossier is really sort of 16 mini reports. it's 35 pages. there's dozens and dozens of bullet points. the salacious stuff, which the media focused on, and i guess -- >> we're sorry. >> i understand it. it was only a very small piece of the 35-page dossier. all the other stuff has to do with business relationships and political interference and russian hacking. the things that mueller is focusing on. we may never know, frankly, about those salacious acts. i frankly could care less, but i do think it was a big distraction. >> in th

in other words, the clinton bought and paid for christopher steele dossier.h level fbi officials willfully committed fraud on fisa court judges to get a warrant on the trump campaign aassociate carter page. they every told them it was bought and paid for by hillary clinton. it's contents were never verified. our own intelligence community had doubts. but because of that phoney dosser an american citizen for a year was spied upon by our federal government. john solomon with more in a minute. weeks out of the mid-terms and the 2020 election is heath up. the democrats have a long and weak field of candidates to challenge president trump. one of the top contenders cam illa is harris is involved with a scandal about a aide. he accepted his resignation tod today. harris will decide over the holidays whether or not she wants to challenge president trump in 2020. and harris is other top liberals will make gun ownership a big issue for 2020. they do not believe in the second amendment the way a lot of americans do. democrats should take note of what happened to dick's

right in the they did tell the judge whoever funded christopher steele was look for dirt on donald trump just didn't bother to tell them it was hillary clinton's team. i guess they weren't so keen on telling the judgment was clinton funded opposition research. maybe we ought to think about that research and triple economic that research ourselves. if i were the fbi i would have sent someone to russia and said check this out and check it again. you don't go issuing fisa warrants on people unless you have a real firm foundation and belief that you have reason to do so. the steele dossier, this thing was research, opposition research funded by opponents and somehow we are using this to issue fisa warrants? that is as goodlatte says, a kind of weapon --izing of our government. we cannot use government resources to take down political enemies. that's the concern here. is that what our federal government did? and if so we have a real problem. here top react. host of "the next revolution," steve hilton. this worries me. it's one slippery slope. if you allow the government to use' one kind of op

that's by christopher steele puts together holy uncorroborated unverified dossier full of lies, straightom the kremlin. and instead of investigating obvious collusion, they use that dirty campaign op research. they never verified, they never corroborated, as the very basis to the very investigation to donald trump. they committed fraud multiple times on the fisa court to get warrants against the trump campaign associate, that's carter page. they use that in they coordinated leak strategy and they talked about it. why would they have a leak strategy? to manipulate the american voters. and today is a foundation of what is robert mueller's witch hunt. it doesn't end there. remember uranium one. let's talk about this, do we care about russian interference in america? hillary clinton, secretary of state? 1 of 9 people signing off on sending 20% of our uranium which is the foundational material for nuclear weapons to the hostile regime of russia, the hostile actor of vladimir putin? in 2015 "the new york times" reported, "now they announced their intention to acquire a majority stake. he recei

became aware of the involvement of the dnc and fusion gps as it relates to their hiring of christopher steele. he indicated the other day that he wasn't aware of that until he read reports long after he was gone. i find that very hard to substantiate based on other evidence. >> democrats at the republican land, could lead an investigation is not designed to find the facts but damage the special counsel. >> they seem to want to play defense counsel with the president and wanted to do everything in their power to bring doubt regarding the mueller investigation. >> the republicans will continue to rake jim comey over the coals as long as they can and it continues to be at the direction of president trump. >> the transcript should be published in the next 24 hours. >> this brings us to a new development surrounding christopher steele's dirty dossier which is a very document to prompt an investigation into all things donald trump. "the daily caller" recently found that even a "washington post" reporter admits that the dossier contents are flat out unverified. still, to this day. and according to t

together, they considered using -- he considered using christopher steele, the findings to challenge the 2016 election results in court. that's why he was doing it? which makes yet another way hillary clinton was planning to use the dirty dossier to rig the election after the election should she lose. of course, this was all done with the money funneled through a law firm as a legal expense. not a political expense. sounds like campaign finance issues. a lot of people in the media are interested in that topic. not hillary. no investigation into that campaign finance violation. the question we have to ask ourselves is why. it should be of course. her last name is not trump. she's not anyone that supports trump. so she has a different justice system. one that trump supporters don't have. we'll have a lot more on this later. also tonight, once again, democrats continuing to play politics with our nation's security. president trump is standing strong. calling out the far left for their hypocrisy. watch this. >> the fact is, they supported fences and walls and partitions. but you know wha

hiring a firm and then hired for, christopher steele, the british spy who then had his foreign sources, russian sources, actually, to on donald trump. i looking into that dossier? some of them have been wrong? this is such an utter distraction. it is a disservice to our country. i cannot understand what they're trying to prove here must they find touchup hired a hacker to illegally obtained john podesta 's emails and turn them over to wikileaks. maybe they got something. stretch. i am not sure what mr. miller is trying to prove this investigation has been going on and on. i do not think he knows either. joining me now is brad blakeman who were done several presidential campaigns along with former hillary clinton campaign advisor. talk to me about the opposition research part of this. he likes politics to offer business that goes on to that opposition research staff. besides do this? >> absolutely. there cannot be a football game if you do not have an offenses and defenses team. to know what they are capable of. what they've done. >> i am just curious. hillary clinton, her team commissi

thess law firm that hired christopher steele, the law firm actually funneled money to the fusion gps,he oppo research group, to put the cd document together. that was perkins coie. they considered using -- he consider using, christopher steele, the findings to challenge a 2016 election results in court. that is why he was doing it, which makes yet another way hillary clinton was planning to use the dirty dossier directly election after the election should she lose. of course, this was all done with her money funneled through the lawle firm is a legal eventc not a political expense. sounds like campaign finance issues. a lot off people in the media ae interested in that topic, but not with hillary. no investigation into that campaign finance violation.av the question we all have to ask ourselves as wide. it should be obvious. her last name is not trump. she is not anyone who supports trump. she has a whole different justice system, one that trump supporters don't have. we'll have a lot more in this later. also, once again, democrats continuing to play politics with our nation security.

fisa application itself and he was unaware of this relationship between the former british spy christopher steeleho did the research on dossier, the justice department official who helped get some of that information to the fbi in the fall of 2016. the fbi was also getting dossier important to note whether channels -- and then also this issue of -- the funding. it was funded by dnc in clinton campaign with. but director comey says in line of questioning to one of the in thes on committee that he didn't feel that that information about which political party was funding it was really that germane or irrelevant to surveillance court but they knew it was some kind of political document, with john. >> that brings us to the russia investigation, what have you learned about that based on these transcripts? >> well going through the transcripts, one of the key headlines at least to us here at fox based on a reporting is that he documents that in the summer of 2016 when they opened the russia counterintelligence investigation that was looking at alleged contacts between trump campaign officials and russia

it's been so damaged in the public domain, christopher steele. >> i don't know the man, but by all account writing down what people tell him. >> did michael cohen go to prague? let's get the tape. are we not going to discuss this? that was from the dossier, right? >> it was from the dossier, pete. let me be difficult for a moment. >> go ahead. i'm used to it. >> here is the problem. people focused on the things that were the most salacious, the most sort of -- give me another word. >> scandalous? horrible? unbecoming of a president? tell me when to.stop. >> no, no, you got it. >> but that's not what the dossier was about. in the main, the dossier was about russian intelligence operations directed against the united states. and in the main, that is being born out by publicly filed documents. that's what matters. >> cohen to prague? don't know. >> don't know. >> outside of the zen, check, so we hear the critics sometimes dialed up to volume 11 talking about how the steele dossier formed the basis for any fisa warrants, any surveillance warrants issued by the judge. what's your take on that b

this brings us to a newcr development surrounding christopher steele's dirty dossier, which we all know was the very document used by james comey's fbi to prompt an investigation to all things donald trump. "the daily caller" recently found that even a "washington post" reporter admits to the dossiers contents as flat-out unverified. according to this reporter, not even the fbi or cia believe its key findings. watch this. >> the thing that people remember the most vividly about the dossier is the idea that there is a tape somewhere, of trump consorting with prostituen in moscow. there is other material in the dossier, we spent 18 months trying to find down. there is an assertion that michael cohen, trump's lawyer, dispels payments that were needed at the end of the campaign. we have had to reporters through every hotel in prague, all over the place, just to try to figurt out if he was ever there and came away. we talked to sources at the fbi and the ciaa and elsewhere. they do not believe that ever happened. >> judge jeanine: joining us now or the reaction as "washington times" columnis

>> guy: well, christopher steele's pay later on the process by the fbi. i assume he would say "i didn't know it was the dmc or the democrats." thinking back to the interview that bret baier did with him, when he claims that he still come at this later date, was not sure that it was the democrats are the hillary clinton campaign that paid for that dossier. that it was republicans that paid for, which was a debunk the talking point. for somebody who seems to understand a lot of details and is confident in his lack of guilt in this situation or at least not holding any response building, there are some very big blind spots. it seems like he has. that being said, that was a lot we just took it from catherine herridge. the wind up to this whole conversation. the idea that anyone, like the fbi or the justice department, and trapped michael flynn because they didn't tell him noo lie to federal investigators that he should have the tell that -- to anyone, little the former director of the dia. he knows you shouldn't lie to the fbi. >> capri: let me just jump in o

in other words, the clinton bought and paid for christopher steele dossier with russian lies. the smoking gun evidence that high-level fbi officials willfully committed a fraud, multiple times, on fisa court judges to obtain and secure a warrant on the trump campaign associate, carter page. they never told the fisa judge that the dossier was bought and paid for by hillary clinton, a massive omission, or that its contents were never corroborated oror never verified, and that or own intelligence community had doubts. yet, because of that phony dossier, and american citizen, for a year, was spied on by our federal government. a grave miscarriage of justice. john solomon will have more in just a minute. but first, we are only weeks out of the midterms and already, believe it or not, the 2020 election is starting to heat up. democrats have an extremely long and weak field of candidates likely running to challenge president trump. tonight, one of the top contenders, far left zealot, kamala harris, is cutting ties with a top aide embroiled in one of the massive progressive scandals,

a month before the presidential election, christopher steele was desperate to stop donald trump and desperate to get the dossier into the press. he went to a bunch of reporters, half a dozen. michael isikoff was one of them. they didn't really bite on the wholel thing. it wasn't until the intelligence chiefs, remember, the head of the fbi, cia, nsa went up to trump tower on january 6 of 2017. donald trump was the president-elect. they go up there and they briefed him on russian efforts to interfere with the election, and after that, there's a one-on-one meeting with comey and president-elect trump and comey tells him about the dossier story about trump being in the hotel room with prostitutes in moscow. the dossier has played a key role in getting trump and the t fbi off to a very, very bad relationship. it's been a really important part of this trump-russia investigation. >> laura: andy, i want to go to you. even when we saw some of the transcript of what comey was saying yesterday on capitol hill, he is blaming the republicans despite the factt that we know this dossier was phony from the b

isikoff said things that trump did not quote, in broad strokes, christopher steele was onto something. i'm joined by michael isikoff, co-author of "russian roulette." michael, have you, in fact, utterly and completely cleared the president and his campaign of any wrongdoing having to do with russia whatsoever? >> no. and, in fact, i think i made clear in the interview that the president was quoting that there are serious matters, and that the steele dossier was onto them, that there was a major russian effort to interfere in our election. that it included extensive outreach to cultivate members of the trump campaign. there were multiple contacts between the trump campaign and people associated with the kremlin that were never disclosed to the public. all of that, you know, was true, is true and will be true when we're done. what i did say is that some of the specific allegations, some of the more sensational allegations in the steele dossier have not borne out, at least no evidence has come forward to corroborate them. and in some respects the credibility of some of the specific alleg

nobody told them christopher steele the author of that had been let go as unreliable. nobody told the fisa court judges that the news reports were circular and based on the dossier itself. so that was kind of a poison tree. a lot of these people said things in numerous testimonies, not knowing that that would be collated with a surveillance. and then we get into the unmasking. so, finally, and this is finally, 25 people in the doj or fbi have been reassigned, chose to be retired or were fired in association with these entire mess. nobody is talking about it. i can't think of any time in us history where the two top intelligence agencies, the head of those agencies, jim clapper and john brennan, not only lied under oath, to a congressional committee, admitted they lied under oath and had entire exemption. so i know it's not you tube all the time but that's really disturbing that we have this mueller track and then we have all of these violations it that, so when mueller starts or sanctimonious and logan act and fora act and government officials have to be above the law,

dossier and he claims the fbi was aware that christopher steele was talking with the media before that warrant was ever secured. do you have more details on the timeline? you think you will get more tomorrow? >> i hope we get more tomorrow. i am also on on the house intelligence committee. i knew most of what, if not all of what you just said. but the point you raise is the salient one, that fisa abuses, and whether or not the world's premier law enforcement agency should be relying, even in a marijuana case, should be relying on information that you have not vetted, corroborated, or contradicted. this is an investigation, a counterintelligence investigation into the campaign of a presidential candidate. so what is the threshold for the reliability and credibility of the information? i have long known that the fbi did not corroborate that information before they used it the first time. let's find out whether or not they made any effort to corroborated before they used at the second time or the third time or the fourth time. and if not, why not? that does not get to the issue of th

this wasn't a random person prayed this christopher steele. >> kennedy: there was basic questions about christopher steele because there are so much embarrassment that he was in the fbi's employee. >> jessica: of a chain of command, involved in all that, that seems hard to believe. we are voracious news consumers, but we should no more than the former fbi director about all of this happen. >> harris: 100%. >> mike: the american people will lose trust in the institution that we need to work on. i had marines that i deployed with at her now if agents. they need to have trust in their leadership. we need a functional fbi that has the trust of the american people. i worry that that is what's getting lost. >> melissa: that's a good place to end. it's all true. new questions over whom is the best person to replace outgoing white house chief of staff john kelly. we will tell you the names being discussed, and we will debate what the white house needs as the president prepares for reelection race and a possible report from the special counsel. plus, the big bombshell among an illegal filing tha

was actually made by the author of the dossier himself while he was taking questions in court christopher steele said i'm here i'm going to quote party such as the democratic national committee and also an organization known as hillary for america considers steps they would be legally entitled to take the challenge the story to challenge the validity of the outcome of the election which basically means that. maybe the dossier wasn't paid for hillary clinton herself but at least the d.n.c. or other organizations affiliate to it only again to find some sort of legal ground to challenge the outcome of the election. all right speed on. the coming hours as well thank you for trying carol correspond on not one of us but it so far this always. kept in the loop on the breaking stories we got for you as they happen to know the from moscow as kevin zero in saying thanks for watching international. you know world of big parts of the lot and conspiracy it's time to wake up to dig deeper to hit the stories that made stream media refuses to tell more than ever we need to be smarter we need to stop slamming th

author of the dossier himself it came when he was taking questions in court and according to christopher steele this is what should have happened as a result of the dossiers publication based on the voice party switchers the democratic national committee and she could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to chinese the validity of the outcome of that election which basically means that ok the dossier may have not been paid by hillary herself but some sort of organization that's affiliated with her something like that and again all need to find some sort of legal ground to challenge the outcome of the twenty six thing or. a positive agreement report next on the fate of syria it was thrashed out in switzerland geneva meeting hosted by the un special syria envoy stephan de mistura top diplomats from russia iran and turkey have agreed to launch a committee for drafting a new constitution for syria early next year. of a very useful meeting was the secretary general special envoy agreed to efforts aimed at convening the first session of the constitutional community ingenue occurred i

of the dossier himself it came while he was taking questions in court and christopher hill christopher steele sorry says that as a result of this dossier publication here's what should have happened. based on that's advice party such as the democratic national committee. could consider strips they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that selection. which basically means that ok the dossier may have not been paid by hillary herself but some sort of organization that's affiliated with her something like that and again all need to find some sort of legal ground to challenge the outcome of the two thousand and sixteen election you so lead this is now or earlier thanks for spreading the twists tonight two years on all right. next to her post freeman on the phone to syria has been thrashed out in geneva really at a meeting that was hosted by the u.n. special syria envoy staffan de mistura top diplomats from russia from around from turkey all agreed to launch a committee for drafting a new constitution for syria early next year. of a very useful meeting was