it is totally embedded into irish society to accept racism - irish society to accept racism against —cept racism against travellers. does it feel, in against travellers. does it feel, in a sense, against travellers. does it feel, in a sense. that _ against travellers. does it feel, in a sense, that your _ against travellers. does it feel, in a sense, that your community - against travellers. does it feel, in a sense, that your community is i a sense, that your community is suffering from the last couple only social acceptable form of racism? socially. what we have seen in recent — socially. what we have seen in recent times in terms of black lives matter. _ recent times in terms of black lives matter. we — recent times in terms of black lives matter, we have a tendency in irelahd — matter, we have a tendency in irelahd to _ matter, we have a tendency in ireland to think racism happens elsewhere. it is confined to this black— elsewhere. it is confined to this black and white binary. racism in 21st—century ireland against travellers, it hangs in the air trainers _ travellers, it hangs i

particular person, but for society. uh, this question is not here, first of all, the choice of an ethical paradigm. that is, if we choose an ethical paradigm within the framework of which the individual exists for the sake of the family, for the sake of the good, a large family, like a state, yes, or we are talking about a society in which, let's say, utilitarian ethics implies the multiplication of good in the interests of everyone, so that everyone lives well , but at the same time, no one needs some abstract greatness. yes, so this question is here. it just rests on a basic understanding of what we should if china chooses what and every single citizen is not important. what matters is the common good well, that means everything around kolkhoznaya everything around me is a philosophical question, because china chooses as su. who, after all, someone makes the choice, you understand the huge number of millionaires and billionaires who, here i was in las vegas , came only chinese, i must have watched rich chinese. well,

i think that that was true and the american philosophical society. i think it was definitely true at the nhs as well. right? i mean, i think this idea of publishing publishing or work and promoting it in. that way was really important to any of these institutions that were kind of trying to collect and record information whether that was a natural history or american history in terms of funding. i mean, i think that many of these institutions tended to be privately funded so really until you get to the smithsonian so i think and even that was the result of the quest to the us government by james smithson, so i think that from the start of the question of funding has been really tricky one within the united states for is museums and you see a lot of them evolving as private institutions as a result. lots to say that question. i think that's such an interesting question. i just have to add because it's something that i've been thinking about a lot as we annotate the next volume of the atoms papers here. is that john adams is the president of the americ

i'm now looking when at russian society. this is also there, and these are those who are people who, and for some reason, sympathize with ukraine. yes, right here are the people who are there with avatars, there and so on. and now they will fight. and now there it is in my opinion, just this is such a story. i don’t know how much it will be possible to kill her . well, about what, what to kill her, after all, it is now being pumped around so much. here's what will happen. and go eventually. we also said in this studio that a lot of things will be decided precisely with this group that is stationed there. and uh, there's a military component here in my opinion. it turns out all the same to the fore and completely its obviousness. and and, of course. uh, it’s important here, what we talked about yesterday, it’s important that those people who are russian military people who are now standing there know that, uh, everything is fine here in the rear. it seems to me that this should be repeated from day to day that everything is f

it will be a terrible society.m of reaction is still too early, probably. by the way, vladimir, you said about tolerance. and what idea came to my mind, see colleagues. ah, tolerance is such a ten-year- old empathy, a cult trait that everyone began to extol, if you are not in modern society tolerant or e declare something not tolerant, then here is the notorious new ethics. forgive me for the buzzword, notorious culture. cancellation is also another buzzword. they will tell you. no. you're an outcast, you don't have to work here. you don't need to be in this society, because because tolerance is at its peak, yes, it's at the peak of importance in the human value system, what we got, we got a more tolerant society. no, of course, to assume that here is the same socio-psychological such ter. called reverse racism, when i'm afraid to offend, well known to all history of being afraid to offend a person because of his nationality, because he belongs to a minority. yes, and for this i have to, for example, as a teacher i

but society, well, we kind of talk as a whole.t seems to me that we now need to start studying the transformation that is beginning to take place in society very sociologically. well, what we are discussing. look here. i'm specifically connecting with people right now. living in the liberated territories. here is my colleague in kherson. i will not name how and what, which means that the dream is already speaking forcibly. i take my temperature every day. yes, that's what's changing, how it's changing as of today. he reports that the city is already living an almost peaceful life, but from seven to fourteen. well, what a city, kherson the largest of our liberated bazaars is already buzzing with hives, the villagers are selling milk to everyone. there is meat. the only thing, he says, no, buckwheat, sugar, expensive, but that decides everything. yes, that is, but 7:00 to 14:00 is already an absolutely normal city mood from ambiguity, but this is understandable for everyone. and how are they all the same, well, straight businessmen,

and what kind of feedback system do we have between the state and society. what worries me more and more, because the society in the modern hmm in the modern state in its state has shown the absolute ability to very sane enough delicately ask our government questions, but the government should be able to exactly the same delicately, given the complexity of this situation, but be able to answer and talk to society. give society understandable signals to indicate the prospects for its development. this, of course, is a huge challenge for us. because it seems to me that our elite, i say again, i'm talking about the elite, i have a very gloomy feeling, but our government does not fully understand how powerful our society is. how much is it ready for a very serious movement the last thing we talk a lot about the need hmm education reform on nationalization, if you want education, and now i'll say a terrible thing, but all the people in the field of education will be offended, and it's impossible without a culture of education. on what basis will we build our new

. fix, report which has recognised the huge challenge for society.— challenge for society. generation — challenge for society. a whole generation growing _ challenge for society. a whole generation growing up. - challenge for society. a whole generation growing up. i - challenge for society. a whole | generation growing up. i would challenge for society. a whole - generation growing up. i would like to see what steps they will put into action to make sure they don't get afflicted for a long time. my son got good at ripping off got good at ripping, afflicted for a long time. my son got good at ripping, not particularly helpful! hello, and a warm welcome to the film review on bbc news. there is a huge gap in secondary school education and i'mjane hill, and taking us through this week's cinema with university releases is mark kermode. stu d e nts students being ripped off so we have true things, which is the new film by harry wootliff, who made only you. we have sonic the hedgehog two, which pretty much does what it says on the tin. and we have morbius, featuring the acting ta

the american fill cough sal society promoted useful it a knowledge much like other learned societies and institutions, especially the royal society of london it was modeling a lot of its s activities. they had a few ways they thought to do that. so first they planned to meet regularly and gather information from a network of correspondents around the atlantic world and publish scholarly articles about their research. they planned to form a library and, finally, they established a cabinet. so like other early cabinets of curiosity, the aps cabinet heldo a wide variety of objects, pressed plants, artifacts and th other objects sent from around the atlantic world.f the aps was not alone in developing this kind of collection alongside its library. here in the greater boston area there were numerous examples of this pattern. so the american academy of arts and sciences, of course the mhs, all of these institutions also t had cabinets that looked very similar to the one at the aps. around this time harvard collegc had a philosophy chamber that n included a range of different objects such a

. ads, report which has recognised the huge challenge for society.— challenge for society.ation growing up. i - challenge for society. a whole | generation growing up. i would challenge for society. a whole - generation growing up. i would like to see what steps they will put into action to make sure they don't get afflicted for a long time. my son got good at ripping off got good at ripping, afflicted for a long time. my son got good at ripping, not particularly helpful!

from libraries and historical societies to academies, lyceums and colleges. but across these different n contexts we can see a lot of resonances and how their purposm is being imagined. the founders of these institutions often wrote down f and shared their mission, le whether through acts of al incorporation or other written documents. k they often emphasizes this idea of useful knowledge, suggesting how material objects themselves can make knowledge itself more tangible and concrete. additionally they make lofty claims about a broader mission o of research and education. museums were committing to preserves objects for posterityr and promised a kind of democratic access to knowledge, even if things didn't play out this way. i will talk more about this in a couple of minutes. in order to look at this history, i have drawn on my own background as a literary scholar in order to trace accounts of museums across fictions, essays, guide books and periodicals and also to put these descriptions w in conversation with the kinds of information that we can get from don

in society as a whole. and lucretia mott is saying that in 1854. did you have anything else you wanted to add? >> so to what extent was, lucretia mott in line with the views on women, as complimentary or things like that. >> i think what she is suggesting, is that women ought to have influence, and they ought to be able to reform, and they ought to be able to carry on in a public way, and yet they are not able to because of the kind of treatment of them as servants. she is saying, that their own qualities, as women she is not challenging that women are different from men, it is not a kind of liberal individualists notion. she accepts the idea that women and men are different. that women are not able to express the full nature of their contributions. the question here is, was she punished for taking on such a line. you know she was not everybody's cup of tea. but she was so forthright in the way that she spoke about them and so true to her own causes that she was really and perhaps i would guess if i were co

and unlike in france — within russian society. and unlike in france or— within russian society.e or in the us or even in the uk, — in france or in the us or even in the uk, the— in france or in the us or even in the uk, the separation never really happened. — the uk, the separation never really happened, and it's really interesting. vladimir putin was baptised — interesting. vladimir putin was baptised as a boy and his dad was a member_ baptised as a boy and his dad was a member of— baptised as a boy and his dad was a member of the communist party, so that really— member of the communist party, so that really is something, and the priest _ that really is something, and the priest who— that really is something, and the priest who officiated his baptism was kirill's father, so they have a very close — was kirill's father, so they have a very close connection, and they share _ very close connection, and they share a — very close connection, and they share a worldview. the russians as i understand — share a worldview. the russians as i understand it, and i have actually gone _ under

societies in the longest lived. it lasted until 1870 when the 15th amendment 14th and 15th amendments were ratified. it's noted. they were noted not only for being advocating speaking in what they call in the language of the day promiscuous audiences promiscuous. meant men and women were there in the audience's but also the ppas was also interracial a to the 45 original members were in fact african americans and they regularly challenged racism even within their own movement anti-slavery people in general for the end of slavery abolitionist wanted slavery abolished immediately lucretia mott was an immediatist an abolitionist and also someone that thought that african americans should be given civil rights immediately upon abolition this put her on the far left french of the anti-slavery movement of the 1830s. despite i'm far left friend. she was a really good speaker really well liked and so she was chosen as one of the seven i think seven delegates to the world anti-slavery convention in 1840. but she arrived in lo

she believes that creative endeavours can help transform societies. one of the collective�*s films exploring homosexuality was banned in kenya. gay sex is a crime here. so how far is she shifting opinions? dr njoki ngumi, welcome to hardtalk. thank you so much for having me, zeinab. it's lovely to be here. you studied medicine at nairobi university. you worked as a doctor for three years and then you gave up practising medicine — why? i really dislike the term "give up". ifeel like i kind of opened the hospital doors and went out into the world, where a lot of other things were waiting, including patients, at times when they are not necessarily having to come and perform. being a patient in the hospital, people are sick everywhere and doctors can be useful everywhere, notjust in the hospital. but look, people are sick everywhere. and you know how the kenyan health service has taken a real hammering during the pandemic. two of your friends died from covid, and the country needs doctors. let me give you a figure. there are 26 doctors for every 100,000 p

and this is the society e is not all, but the radical minority.le who rejoiced at the burning of people in odessa, these are the same people who donated the army in 14-15, and at all these marathons, e-gay , they shouted how they treated this, like football, we know these people and these people have leaders, this is a progressive intelligentsia that has made a career. i am now watching a lot of interviews with all these fashionable ukrainian journalists, which are still two or three years old. back even yes, actually 3-4 months ago were the same colonialists. they already shared everything, it was the plan. well, vasily dmitrievich let's be honest, it was the ideology of croatianization, that is, we will inflict a sneaky blow on the donbass when it is possible, and the second was the ideology of the colonization of russia goncharenko when the ukrainian kuban created the verkhovna rada fraction under what tasks, including, but covered it, including including our directors, helgauz, you and him on the air back in the fifteenth year, you understand,

this is due to the demand of these societies.cally formed hatred of russia there, on the contrary, there are good relations with russia the other side. and they have a request that they come to europe to live in the european union 15 minutes ago. or wait, they told that politicians themselves form public opinion, and then they listen to this formation, he said, formations. i, too, here i confirm there is a process of forming public opinion, but there is a question of being a hostage, that is, fulfilling a request. it's basically a comparison. i honestly say that this is what this is, and their victory is the result of the fact that their proposals to people coincided with the request people. what is the request of these people, the world stability is not conservative. liza, nationalism is not liberalism for me, and don’t bother with other abusive words about stability. not in this conflict. it’s not you who are compliments to carefully go through with everyone to get gas, because especially they are so rich, like germany germany

susan: this is william f buckley talking about the john birch society. [video clip] >> the soviet union was winning the cold war, and the reason for this was the whole government of the united states was riddled with traders. men and women who were reconciled to commonest victory. that is hard to believe, but you said senator goldwater was reluctant to announce the john birch society? he did not want to single out that organization when he was nominated for president. the only one so far to announce extremists. there was a ton of pressure to name the society, but he said he did not want to do that, denouncing some of his best supporters as a matter of fact, his own campaign manager was a member of the john birch society, so was my mother. susan: throughout the history you tell, the reality is political parties are coalitions. here is an example. his famous statement about extremism, was that ultimately the nail in the coffin? matthew: there is a funny anecdote i tell where he delivers a famous line, let me remind you extremism is no vice. one journalist

how am i supposed to integrate in a society that re'ects supposed to integrate in a society that re'ects in a society that re'ects me? one supposed to integrate in a society that re'ects me? .,, that rejects me? one hosting count , that rejects me? one hosting country. two _ that rejects me? one hosting country, two different - that rejects me? one hosting i country, two different refugees, that rejects me? one hosting - country, two different refugees, two different experiences. recently the danish government has bashed a special law to host ukrainian refugees although it is well for its zero asylum policy. this has led to a lot of will get to see some to the danish government and i have come here to find out if there is a double standard when it comes to refugees. mi; double standard when it comes to refu~ees. y , double standard when it comes to refu~ees. g , , ,., refugees. my first stop is a cam ostin: refugees. my first stop is a cam posting ukrainian _ refugees. my first stop is a cam posting ukrainian refugees. - refugees. my first stop is a cam - posting ukrainian refugees. denm

but you writeca about one guy with the flatterers society but even then a lot of the people and mostthe people were treating it as a joke and that is a theme throughout the book sometimes you can tell who is kidding and who is not there's a great line the line between skeptic and believer. so how did you deal with that in your reporting not always being able to tell who took this seriously? >> it's funny because there has always been trolling engagement with father theory and people weighed show up in the 18 hundreds and just to make fun are pretend to take his side because an asset i think flat earth is a funny area it's understandable to laugh at that what happened mayh century into the 21st is that the flat earth society although funded in earnest got the lifeblood from people who were joining as a joke to apply for a membership card it was a big laugh but yet at sustained the movement and kept it around even joking engagement and nafta keep the on the forefront of people's minds although we cannot be entirely sure how much it was flat earth they kept the founding documents in cir

it's persistence in our lives, in our times, in our societies, begs the question, why could it be that the policies governments think, will prevent violent extremism, might actually be making things worse. the aftermath of the 911 attacks on united states in 2001 you could visibly see that the world has been securitized. a certain architecture of things has materialized, literally there is a certain presence of the state security that has been increased the militarized presence has really transformed the scene of the world around us. there has been new legislation that has increased powers of surveillance that have given more of an ability to shrink the privacy space for citizens around the world . news alerts all the time, keeping the citizen on their toes a certain phraseology of be careful. observe, report. if you see something that doesn't look right to me or text me, generally a sense of fear. think the threat, has it been lessened? has there been results in terms of addressing it? and the paradox is that it has not quite the opposite. so clearly something is not working we must r

another task comes to the fore - to split russian society, to destroy russia from within.e the hitch doesn’t work, our society shows maturity, cohesion supports our armed forces supports our efforts aimed at ensuring the unconditional security of russia itself and at supporting citizens living in the donbas to support our people in the donbas on the very deed. and since they fail in this information field, fooling, of course, their citizens, using their monopoly position in the information space of their countries and in some other countries, but to endure a fiasco here on the territory of russia turned to terror. to the preparation of the murders of our journalists in this connection, of course, uh hmm, it should be noted that we know by name the well-known curators from western services. first of all of course, uh the us cia who uh who work with the security agencies ukraine apparently give such advice. so much for the attitude to the rights of journalists. this is about the dissemination of information. this is about human rights in general. they only care about their o

in principle, i think that russian society is already ready to use these weapons, but look. country has been increased many times over in ukrainian society if it was the use of weapons on the second on the third day of the war, it is possible that it had some kind of psychological effect, now i am not sure, that is, even if it is used tactically, nuclear weapons will be destroyed, god forbid some small ukrainian city or district of some of a big city. well, what will be the effect of this action? let's start with the statement of russian propagandists. they make me very happy because the rhetoric has really changed from the beginning of the war from raising eyebrows, and you don't know whether in berlin or kyiv there will be troops from raising eyebrows, so today they are talking about that we, i'm sorry, we were short on words and now we need to figure out what to use next, you and i understand that even if, er, the russian federation uses nuclear weapons, well, it's obvious that even there it's tactical obviously, the consequences for the russians will be, in short, this u

i am konstantin mogilevsky, chairman of the board of the russian historical society.stions will be devoted to the history of russia questions from the russian historical society for 800. it was in this part of our country that the civil war ended in 1922, they were in the crimea in 1920, as some people think, the far east questions from the russian historical society for 1.000 this prominent russian statesman, member of the state council, geographer, botanist, major philanthropist, view from the chairman of the russian geographical society was also one of the founders of russian scientific statistics. maybe semyonov tien shan absolutely right? this is pyotr petrovich semyonov from xiangshan, please. question from the russian historical society 600. presenting a document on the abolition of the death penalty in russia this minister of justice exclaimed i am happy that it fell to me to sign a decree on the abolition of the death penalty in russia forever, but soon as minister of war. he is the death penalty. i returned it, maybe there is no milyutin. he was originally m

that's what happens when society loses track of what is true.e other hand, the last couple of months have also shown what can happen when the world pushes back. we've seen it in the people, including some of our obama leaders in europe, who are organizing on social media to help ukrainian refugees, offering food, shelter and jobs and rides and we've seen it in an i.t. army of volunteers who work to break through russia propaganda, and reach out to mothers of russian soldiers, asking them to call on putin to bring their sons home. and we've seen it in the combination of old and new media, like a viral image of a russian tv editor walking into a live shot with a handwritten sign calling for an end to the war. handwritten sign was a tool. tv is a tool. the internet is a tool. social media is a tool. at the end of the day, tools don't control us. we control them. and we can remake them. it's up to each of us to decide what we value and then use the tools we've been given to advance those values. and i believe we should use every tool at our disposal

so we push constantly for civil society voices to speak. when we spoke yesterday about the issues, sexual violence against women, we had three extraordinary women come before the council to speak. speaking in the context of syria and western ethiopia. those voices matter. they matter more than our voices matter. so that is the priority for the u.s. as we deal with the myriad of crises, having civil society there, having human rights at the center of our policy. then bringing our partners and alliances together to partner on issues of common interest to the globe. mr. coulibaly: thank you. and again, the importance of what you just mentioned on the way the u.n. has been able to bring in civil society organizations into the discourse. i think it is very crucial. it would be a great and very important part of the future of the multilateral system as we envision it. so with that, i can turn to some of the questions that we have received. and the first one is from sarah. population funds. her question is how do we ensure that the unique needs of

politics and societies. . . , ., societies.actually _ societies. imran khan is saying that the country actually needs - societies. imran khan is saying that the country actually needs fresh - the country actually needs fresh elections. if you're confident in your government, why not move ahead to that? we your government, why not move ahead to that? ~ ., ., , , , to that? we have no issue with fresh elections, to that? we have no issue with fresh elections. that _ to that? we have no issue with fresh elections, that has _ to that? we have no issue with fresh elections, that has been _ to that? we have no issue with fresh elections, that has been on - to that? we have no issue with fresh elections, that has been on our- elections, that has been on our agenda also. we need a little bit of time and that is within the law, absolutely. our mandate is 2023, and we need a little time to reform, bringing, repealsome we need a little time to reform, bringing, repeal some of the forms, they are laws thatjust privilege his party and remov

of all, of course there was the fires and then there was social unst and it's very unsettling in society. what do you say to people who live in fear? - well, most people realize if they're living in fr, it isn't actually helping them. and 's a natural reaction. no, i'm t here in california in some very nice woods and a deer will co by and i want to make friends with that deer, but it's not going to make friends with me. 's gonna run like mad. and we are wired as aighting ecies and also a fleeing species. so that's the natural state of human beings. now, what i say to them is it's time in our history that we rewire our natural state that we learn not to react with fear. and how do you do that? well, you do it with understanding that it's a natural thing to be feeling but it's not helping you. that actually gratitude and love is a feeling. and if you could concerate on those two feelings, you can overcome fear at times and you can make it a life discipline that is important with covid for instance, that we are afraid that we'll catch the virus but we do knowhat there is to do about it. and

if you think back to what society was say, in 1960, 60 years ago, this was a society in which we literally had laws against miscegenation, which were so extreme that the nazis refused to accept them. the one drop of blood loss. -- laws. the rights of women were still not recognized. it was not until 1975 that women had the legal right, guaranteed legal right to serve on the federal juries. that means, to be regarded as peers, as persons and not property. which they basically were in british common law that the country to go over. they were, in many respects, minimal rights were not respected. well, that has changed. that is an improvement. beginning in the late 1970's, there was a shift in the nature of the state capitalist system, which was described in the previous comment, the move towards the neoliberal system that has been quite harsh for the general population here, and across the world. an enormous concentration of wealth and a precarious existence for many, which has led to understandable feelings of anger and resentment, distrust of authority, contempt for institutions. that can t

i think building technology for a great society is possible. i would say right now we have a lot of technologies for which we've identified and so the first thing we can do or that we need to do that is more pressing is to find ways to mitigate those harms. there is lots of low hanging fruit in that area and if we can get that done, what that shows is the ability to rise to the challenge. i feel the same way. there's so much skepticism of what can actually be done and part of it is if we understand that there are things we can do now, that optimism is done later. in the long term though i think that there is a notion of how do we build technology for good. and we see signs of that right now. we have an organization that is healthy and a lot of the things they do is students that look for ways in which technology can be used for societal benefit they do things like partner with ngos and what kind of technology they need to help build to show them what might be possible and in some cases work the following to see what can be deployed. helping to

what society is society? firstly, figure it out in flight. we are still very actively confused with them. you said that ukrainians are there now and in general. by the way, the ukrainian place, well, from it was not existed for many centuries, and now it has remained in in memory, the people said they were, well, i walk in literature, but in the political ukrainian nationalism of the one that was there, i don’t know where he considers himself, that bogdanov does not exist in ukraine now, so there is no need to call nazism nationalism these are two completely emphasize different phenomena . you just don't have to forget one simple thing about your son - that's exactly what the german oriented towards the russians and everything russian, to destroy everything russian, physically, morally, ideologically, whatever. there is such saturation in ukraine.

freedom of speech is at the heart of every democratic society.n america, those protections are enshrined in the first amendment to our constitution. there is a reason it came first in the bill of right. i am pretty close to a first amendment absolutist. i believe that in most instances, the answer to bad speech is good speech. i believe that the free, robust, sometimes antagonistic exchange of ideas produces better outcomes and a healthier society. no democratic government can or should do what china, for example, is doing, simply telling people what they can or cannot say or publish while trying to control what is said about their country abroad. and i don't have a lot of confidence that any single individual or organization, private or public, should be charged at determining who gets to say or do what. that said, the first amendment is a check on the power of the state. it doesn't apply to private companies like facebook or twitter, any more than it applies to editorial decisions made by "the new york times" or fox news. it never has. social m

because also on the street, so that civil society understands about our countries like these, over 60 in the world, what is happening in ukraine, so that the media understands, but also the most important thing is that politicians understand, because then they go out of the street into the corridors of their parliaments to work with deputies and senators, to convince them of what is necessary today that in ukraine today, our coordination is needed and we cooperate very closely with the office of the president, with the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine and the ministry of defense of ukraine, where we can add a lot of information to the leaders of our enterprises. the work of that army is the main thing. and the first thing we ask for is weapons for ukraine . i see that the countries that voice for provide, but then our work and things to say that diplomats very often cannot speak to others . stop therefore completely embarvo because the equator of russian products is mandatory. the third is the european integration of ukraine. we hope that in june ukraine will not be given the st

i think interviewing the flat earth society about the space force is a great idea. i went through that once that has occurred to you you absolutely there's there's no way you can't do a story like that. but i also appreciate the the thinking that you went through afterwards. so there's there's more than one kind of flat earth or there's more than one kind of person involved in the movement you talk a bit about just sort of the range of personalities the range of backgrounds and just and the range of ways people were engaged engaged with the movement you encountered sure, and you're right that there's no real one profile for a flat earther. i found it to be a multiracial multi-class movement. i've asked a lot of flat earthers about their politics and a good number of them describe himself as kind of politically disengaged. of course, they believe the government is one great plot to conceal the flat reality. i would say that they broadly skew conservative. i think a lot of that has to do with the very religious path that many took to flat earth. but there is a range a

look what coronavirus has done to our society.e can't even get together and have family gatherings. we don't enjoy nature. we don't enjoy the little things that are part of life. thank you for being there. i was trying to think of one other subject. if i would write a book, education is life itself. we keep learning things from the day we are born until the time we die. please keep up your work. guest: thank you so much. you are right that education should be throughout life. kids are focused on learning the things they need that are age-appropriate that will get them adult skills. children play, chasing games, running games, pretend games. that's the normal course of development that prepares them for conflict. they must have conflicts and learn how to resolve them. what happened around 2012, they all got phones. they all got on social media. it's as though we said you once played it, you're going to have this phone. you're going to spend all of your life on it. you're not going to talk to people anymore. it's going to block out

and the way society thinks in accordance with the principles of god so out of his thinking about howhe second world war, he came up with the idea of the welfare state. is this expression of god's unconditional love every human being and he worked closely with william beveridge of course then supplied the policy details that led to the formation of the welfare state. william temple sadly died in 1944 state. william temple sadly died in 191m so never saw his ideas come to fruition but his thinking is still highly influential. in fruition but his thinking is still highly influential.— fruition but his thinking is still highly influential. in terms of what justin welby _ highly influential. in terms of what justin welby are _ highly influential. in terms of what justin welby are saying, _ highly influential. in terms of what justin welby are saying, then. - highly influential. in terms of what justin welby are saying, then. the | justin welby are saying, then. the argument from the church will be, look, this is a legitimate role for the organised religion, the recognised establishment re

he was considered a young upstart by society. people did not -- the society did not respect him. black people did. but he was not revered the way he was revered today. we have written it into our history to manipulate the way we feel about non-violent protests i think is part of it. you know, it's really amazing to study both the civil rights movement and the black power movement see that it was teenagers, and teenagers and college students who were the engines of these movements on every possible level. and when we don't teach that i think we are trying to disallow teens of today to recognize their own power. you know, how old do you have to be before your voice with married in the world? i would argue not that old. look at ruby bridge, 6iers old, the first kid to integrate public school in new orleans in 1960. you know, she walked in every day in a crowd of white supremacist jeering at her as she went to school. that's what you do, you go to school and you learn. but she's taking a stand for civil rights and doing that at 6. you don't have to be 49? i am 40 and i am still told

how will identities societies and nations form and how will this historical development influence our future? to search for these answers, we visit soviet memorials and looked deep into the soul of ukraine. next we speak with a ukranian director who's filled today, appears to be prophetic. williams went out, i bought them civilian running from bombing in ukraine. this isn't yesterday's news, but a film from 2018 set dumbass, eastern ukraine, where russian forces are supporting pro putin separatist. a yet to put out of the civilians are actors staging a fake news massacre for russian tv propaganda to justify the military encourage hello, christmas city ukraine director saudi last. nita shows how for years russia planned it's war of aggression against ukraine. but the west for me wasn't paying attention to my wish to discuss go with b. e o. she can go to lunch to get a worse oldest la spell, a western liberal democracies were asleep when the new russia was form. how little one was attacking in graz. chechnya again when it was attacking ga, crimea, dumbass and ukraine. and so what we're

the traumas that afflicted a society are forgotten or not talked about in a society that what happens is, sooner or later, these traumas come back with them. yeah, the way they resurface and basically come back to hot the society that is trying to forget about them in the garage options. door unhealed. historic trauma is at the heart of lust. it says documentary baba, young context, using archive footage with no commentary. he depicts events outside keys in 1941, when nazi troops murdered more than 33000 ukranian jews, and dumped them into the baba. yar ravine. alicia to her, she knew by the yard that she, i made the film baba yar about the events of the massacre that throughout the soviet period was never talked about. it was kind of taboo. and in general, soviet propaganda did not even acknowledge the fact that the whole college and a subject was almost completely forgot. ah, of course, it goes without saying that the truth about this event should be told. and the memory of this event that i should live on allah, those lovely res niecy law, the film to pick scenes painful for ukrain

and it was to divide us completely off from society, in my opinion.e other side of the wall from us or all members of the tribal community. you can see it for what it is, to really segregate travellers. you know, when your husband or one of your children wanted to go out for, i don't know, a cup of tea or a meal, would you have to sort of peck where you went to? definitely. and i'd have to have a relationship with that service to be able to book it and that they'd know me and my family. you just couldn't randomly say, i'm thirsty and hungry and i need to go and get something to eat. it doesn't work like that for travellers. what is coming across is how much these people feel marginalised and demonised and the sense they have tolerated prejudice for much too long. statistics alone rarely stir people's feelings, but travellers say the figure is about their plight should disturb our suicide rates seven times higher than non travellers. our suicide rates seven times higher than non travellers. only 3% of us live past the age of 65 years of age. 80% of us

yeah, the way they re surface and basically come back to haunt the society. that is trying to forget about them in the group option. unhealed historic trauma is at the heart of lawson. it says documentary, barbara yard context, using archive footage with no commentary. he depicts events outside keith in 1941, when nazi troops murdered more than 33000 ukranian jews and dumped them into the baba yar ravine. alicia to her, she knew by the yard that she, i made the film baba yar about the event of the massacre that throughout the soviet period was never talked about. it was kind of taboo. and in general, soviet propaganda did not even acknowledge the fact of the holocaust. and the subject was almost completely forgotten. ah, of course it goes without saying that the truth about this event should be told. and the memory of this event that i should live on allah, those lovely raised me, sheila, the film to pick scenes painful for ukrainians, showing locals celebrating the arrival of the nazis and standing by as they round up the jews. yeah, on bless nita's refusal