letter, the first philosophical letter published in the telescope magazine, read. to say that chiadaev’s legacy is not limited to the first philosophical letter at all, they know it primarily, but there were much more of them, there were eight of them, plus there was an apology for a madman and a number of unpublished articles, they very gradually reached the reading public. in the second letter, for example, chiodaev developed the idea of ​​​​the superiority of catholicism over orthodoxy further; this letter would probably be outraged, perhaps even no less than the first; he builds a philosophy of history, as i already said, completely. religious philosophy history, in one of the letters, in my opinion, uh, in my opinion, in my opinion, in the sixth letter he contrasts aristotle with epicurus, speaking of aristotle as a child of darkness, and epicurus as a materialist, despite the fact that he himself is a religious thinker , chiodae is to a large extent a religious thinker, yes, he elevates the materialist epicurus to the peedistal. only here it is necessary to n

published a petition against one of the rsu research centers being named after the famous russian philosopher ivan ilyin. according to the authors of the petition, ilyin allegedly approved of fascism and justified hitler’s crimes. but such a point of view can only be shared by those who have not... read a single work of the philosopher ilyin to the end, have picked up such knowledge, stumbling upon something on the net. all this hostile fuss around ilyin at the russian state university for the humanities flared up, perhaps, for three reasons. first, putin quotes ilyin quite often. lien's compromise ricochets against the president. that's the goal. secondly, the lyan center at rsu was headed by one of the most famous influential modern thinkers in russia, professor alexander. dugin is a bright figure with infectiously uncompromising views. dugin is also a target. third. the ilyin center, under the leadership of dugin, was created as a kind of cradle of modern liberal westernism in our country, the russian state humanitarian university. the fertilization thus threatens to be lost. hence the sla

actually, we were not just talking and not only about the great, in my opinion, philosopher ivan ilint the trend that exists, the division of society into whites red, that in my opinion, the thing is quite dangerous, which is surprising, what is it based on... this is an irreconcilable criticism, it is always based on pulling out certain phrases, expressions, words, taken out of the context of the article or book itself, i will quote an article by the already mentioned veronika kroshenennikova, in 1948, when the crimes of the third reich against humanity were known to the whole world in the article. about fascism, iliin gives a long series of justifications and arguments and sums up: finally, fascism was right, since it proceeded out of a healthy national patriotic feeling, period, that’s all, nothing more, mrs. krasheninnikova does not quote from the mentioned article: notice how... the phrase “fascism was right” was specially inserted. wow, now listen to the other part of this article. fascism should not have despised other races of nationality and began to conquer and eradicate the

“i have more than once turned to the philosophical heritage of ivan aleksandrovich ilyan, who made aiotism. 7 years later in 2003, when gennady andreevich was already 59 years old, and he remained the leader of the communist party, he writes about again." already in another essay, this is a quote from the works of holy russia and koshcheev's kingdom, that's what was written there, among religious thinkers. ivan ilyin had a greater influence on me. and the metropolitan of st. petersburg, ivan snychov, whom i met several times and whom i sincerely and deeply respected. the first communist in the country, who was raised in an atheistic society, names those who had a special influence on him : a clergyman and a religious russian philosopher. against ivan ilyan, the great philosopher and, as it were, the flame is fanned, dividing people into whites on the red, just after our graduation we receive a letter, like this: i am a student of the faculty of philosophy of moscow state university, named after lomanosov, i want to express my deep gratitude to you for protecting the good name of ivan

liang, remember, at the beginning of april this year a rather powerful campaign against russian philosophergher political school named after him. at the russian state humanitarian university, it all started with the fact that students were allegedly indignant at the fact that the higher school was named after the fascist ivan ilyan, quite a few, fiery fascist fighters, patriots, young guys who are going to a rally under the common sign of down with fascism, well, maybe can you argue with that? quite dangerous, which is surprising, on what is this irreconcilable criticism even based, it is based all the time on pulling out some certain phrases, expressions, words taken out of the context of the article or book itself, i will quote the article of the already mentioned veronika kroshenennikova, in 1948, when the crime of the third reich against... and sums it up: finally, fascism was right, since it came from a healthy national- patriotic feeling, period. that's all, nothing more, mrs. krosheninnikova from... notice how the phrase “fascism was right” was specially inserted. wow, huh? now liste

actually, we were not just talking and not only about the great, in my opinion, philosopher ivan ilinnd that exists, the division of society into white and red, which in my opinion the thing is quite dangerous, it’s surprising what it’s built on at all. the phrase “fascism was right” was specially inserted. wow, huh? now listen to the other part of this stage. fascism should not have despised other races of nationality and began to conquer and eradicate them. patriotism does not call for the conquest of the universe. moreover, if you look at ilyin’s other works, you will not find a single one anywhere. a word that justifies expansion, the extermination of other peoples, genocide, the enslavement of peoples, the reduction of the world's population, all that past fascism, modern nazism, revived in europe, is so loud, as we know very well, about which we talked a lot, yes, it hated bolshevism, it’s true. well, you must admit, just imagine, he survived the revolution, the civil war, the murder of the royal family with their children, with the heir, the murder of stalypin in kiev in the th

i have repeatedly turned to ivan’s philosophical heritage.range, for me personally it’s wonderful, then 2024 comes by some coincidence, this is the year when a special military operation continues to take place, right at this very the influence of the clergy and religious time, when consolidation is required from the country, unity is required from the country, out of nowhere some senseless, absolutely hysterical campaign against ivan ilyan, the great philosopher, just flares up and the flames seem to fan, dividing people into whites and red, just after our graduation we receive a letter like this: i am a student of the faculty of philosophy of moscow state university, named after lomonosov, i want to express my deep gratitude to you for... protecting the good name of ivan ilyan, i must say that in my time, it was thanks to your film that i discovered ilyin and his work, soon after that, largely because of this acquaintance, i entered the faculty of philosophy, it was hard to watch how the students were deceived, used in a big game, in quotes

chiodaev they also tried to treat him and drive out demons from him and so on, but the ichadaev philosophers upset by nikolai himself, there uvarov, the minister of education, benkendor was prompted by the phrase: the paragraph that was probably the most harsh, i will quote: peoples are moral beings, just like individuals. in parentheses, i note that he considered the moral law to be the main thread of the development of society, and in general his philosophical letters are letters about the philosophy of history, first of all, and this philosophy of history by uchadaev is completely religious, that is, the moral law, the gospel law, yes, it is realized in history, in this sense it’s a little reminds me of the late schelling, probably, but these are different, different details. they are raised by centuries, just as people are raised by years. it can be said about us that we constitute, as it were , an exception among peoples; we belong to those of them who, as it were, are not part of the human race, but exist only to teach a great lesson to the world. these words will then be quoted very o

i have repeatedly turned to the philosophical heritage of ivan aleksandrovich ilyin, who made a veryhe ideology of state patriotism. after 7 years in in 2003, when gennady andreevich was already 59 years old, and he continued to remain the leader of the communist party, he writes again about ilyan, in another essay, this is a quote from the essay holy russia and koshcheev’s kingdom, that’s what was written there, among religious the thinkers who had the greatest influence on me were ivan ilyin and the st. petersburg metropolitan ioan. snychev, whom i met several times and whom i sincerely and deeply respected. the first communist in the country, who was brought up in an atheistic society, names those who influenced him special influence of the clergyman and religious russian philosopher ilin. for some this is strange, for me personally it is wonderful. and then 2024 comes . dividing people into whites and reds, just after our graduation we receive a letter like this: i am a student at the faculty of philosophy of lomonosov moscow state university, i want to express my deep gratitude

he is a philosopher at unc-chapel hill. and 20 years ago now published quite a famous paper like philosophy. you know, called it's not my fault. and the argument was that although it seems many people, including to him, that we are morally obligated not to do really bad, like drive a gas guzzler. so here's the example i came up with said, think of the worst car you can imagine, the least efficient car you can imagine. now think of this hobby of just driving it around to no in particular it's probably talking about that car so that activity he calls joy gosling and on his a joy guzzle emits something like 14 kilograms of co2 now doesn't really hard to understand like what that means we're going to come back to that but he's like look that's feels like 14 kilograms of co2 you did not need to emit so you shouldn't it like you have a duty not to joy guzzle. but here's the thing carbon cycle is incredibly complex in our atmosphere is absolutely massive so we can talk about this more because some people really want to like down o

dmitry, zatrista philosophers.marxist antonio gramsci, from 1928 to 1937 on... was exactly where he wrote about 3,000 pages, which now form the core of his creative legacy, and well, in a place of detention, in prison, in prison, that’s right, philosophers over 100 , in the first century of our era, trossil of alexandria divided his legacy into nine tetrologies, which included 34 dialogues, 13 letters and... this fruit is called yuzu, and vegetables, fruits for 400. in the story of ivan shmilyov, a man from a restaurant, a precocious rich man, was indignant, he thought that meat in the french style, and you ’re serving me some kind of horned turnip, what did you order? artichoke, artichoke, quite right, apparently, got mixed up with antricot, book fires 400, it is she who is in gorky’s story. childhood, during a night fire, she immediately took command. barn, neighbors, defend, cut down the roof, hay into the garden. yakov, don’t fuss, give the people axes and shovels, let’s put out the fire. who commanded this? if

ivan ilyan, the great philosopher, is just flaring up and the flames are fanning, as it were, dividingter our graduation we receive a letter like this. i am a student at the faculty of philosophy of moscow state university, named after lomanosov. i want to express my deep gratitude to you for defending the good name of ivan ilyan. i must say that in due time, precisely thanks to yours. film, i discovered ilyin and his work, and soon after, largely because of this acquaintance, i entered the faculty of philosophy. it was hard to watch how deceived students, used in a big game, in quotes, indiscriminately threw mud at ilyan. most likely, they did not read his works, never studied the full depth of ivan’s love. it is quite large and from it you can understand that nikolai is seriously just excerpting from this letter, because he is busy or something else, and this letter was written without any hope that it will be published, this letter, this is a cry from the soul, this letter is written from the heart, i am even convinced that he did not imagine , that... we will use his letter in our

at first in april of this year, a rather powerful campaign was launched against the russian philosopherhe highest political school named after him at the russian state humanitarian university. it all started with the fact that students were allegedly outraged by the fact that the higher school was named after the fascist ivan ilyan. a little bit, no less, a fiery fascist. studied there worked in russia appeared only about 10 years ago, she became a prominent political scientist, became a member of the public chamber of russia from 2012 to 2020. dangerous, which is surprising, on what basis this irreconcilable criticism is built, it is built all the time on pulling out certain phrases, expressions, words, taken out of the context of the article or book itself, i will quote the article of the already mentioned veronika kroshenennikova, in 1948, when the reich’s crime against... this article was not quotes, note how the phrase “fascism was right” was specially inserted. wow, huh? now listen to the other part of this article. fascism should not have despised other races of nationality, bega

. this is not a philosophical question of life, you know, somewhere else , when the battles were beforenetsky lysychansk, i talked to my son, he is just a soldier, i am a senior officer, and he says: well, father, why did we have to hold on to severodonetsk too, if it is not feasible and needs significant expenses, i say this is your vision, a soldier's vision, and... now imagine, we have a settlement, er, there is a dilemma, to hold it or retreat, retreat, maybe we will save the lives of our soldiers, and we will spend much more in the lives of our soldiers to get them, but, but there is the next dilemma, a wider one: in a year this settlement will have to be liberated, and if its situation is such that... in a year it will take 10 times more lives of our soldiers to release him than to continue receiving him now, then eh this dilemma becomes even more difficult, uh, and every commander, making a decision, solves these two dilemmas, very difficult, very difficult moral choice , believe me, well, it seems to me that everything is here this is a matter of priorities, it seems to me that

and so this is a little bit nerdy because i'm a philosopher sorry you were warned, right.so we say things all the time and. i was keyed into this because i read the philosophy or is working on this and they're all like walter stuart armstrong. they're all like, do you have a duty not to joy gosal and then they can't prove doesn't cause any harm. it doesn't have any meaningful. but then i started talking to al people, right? and everybody wants to say like no, you're wrong. like if, update your phone the second you need one and you're participating in cobalt mining practice when you absolutely don't need to because your phone is fine and like that's wrong you're doing the wrong thing you're student who, like totally called meore class because buy one, get one free and there's a starb right across from my. and so i'm like, hey, i'm buy one, get free. is there anything you i and and like very justifiably said no i don't support union busters. i would we were going over so i could h . right. that was that was the context here. and so the judgment is sharp right. because it doe

books stood on the shelves, free nobles already, he could afford to read any books, including philosophicalds of mystical literature, which just then began to be translated, here is the broth on which, so to speak. russian freemasonry has matured. in our country, i ’ll make one more remark, we have the idea that the freemasons were banned by the soviet government. well, it's partly true, about another generation masunov, because trotsky was such an ardent opponent of freemasonry, he wrote the first, in my opinion, article in general in his youth, but in fact this happened under catherine, then, so to speak, a lot was hushed up. one of the founders of slavophilism, ivan kirievsky, he complained, speaking about navikoich, that many have not even heard of this great man, a freemason , and writes that here, in terms of the scale of his activity, he is comparable to the american freemason franklin, well, the face is familiar to everyone from a hundred dollar bill , but at the same time century, unfortunately, we know very little, but he was a truly outstanding figure. several hundred book titles

letter, the first philosophical letter published in the magazine telescope.atholicism over orthodoxy further; this letter would probably have outraged, maybe even no less than first, he builds a philosophy. history, as i already said, a completely religious philosophy of history, in one of the letters, in my opinion, uh, in my opinion, in my opinion, in the sixth letter he contrasts aristotle with epicurus, speaking of aristotle as a child of darkness, and epicurus a materialist, despite the fact that he himself is a religious thinker, chiodae is to a large extent a religious thinker, yes, he puts the materialist epicurus on a pedestal, only here it is necessary to note that epicureus does not mean epicureanism, epicureus himself has a very relative relationship to epicureanism. relationship, since epicurus considered the highest joys for a person, the highest pleasure, to be aesthetic pleasure, and not bodily, and bodily pleasure is hedonism, not picureanism, and epicurus rather condemned this. so, again there is a contradiction. and this letter was also not

especially in times like these, so i would like to end with the words of the psychotherapist and philosophertor frankl, he went through a concentration camp, although he could have avoided it, he lost so... loved ones, but he not only didn’t break down, but took away precious healing meanings from this hell. so, victor frankol. the first to break were those who believed that everything would end soon, then those who did not believe that it would ever end. those who survived were those who focused on their business, without expectations. of what else might happen. once again, frankl knew what he was talking about. stop and listen. so be common sense, be patient, and between memories of the past and fantasies of the future, don’t forget about this moment, it’s not for nothing that they call it the present, that’s all for today, happily, we have a huge number. projects there are so-called russian houses, they are called that by the people, but formally they are all called beautifully, russian centers of science and culture, the most important of course, are located in minsk, they are all their

i have repeatedly turned to the philosophical heritage of ivan aleksandrovich ilyin, who made a veryntinued to be the leader communist party, he writes again. spilled already in another work, this is a quote from the work holy russia and koshcheev’s kingdom. that's what was written there. among religious thinkers, ivan ilyin had the greatest influence on me. and the st. petersburg metropolitan ion snychev, whom i met several times and whom i sincerely and deeply respected. the first communist in the country who... brought up in an atheistic society, names those who had a special influence on him as the clergyman and religious russian philosopher ilin, for some this is strange, for me personally, this is wonderful, here comes 2024 by some coincidence, this is the year when a special military operation continues to take place, right at this very time... when consolidation is required from the country, unity is required from the country, from scratch, simply some kind of senseless, absolutely hysterical... campaign against ivan ilyan, the great philosopher, flares up and the flames seem

breathe here and nature, i love my job. it was said back in the 6th century bc by the ancient chinese philosopher lao tzu. thousands of years later , modern scientists echo him. based on scientific research, they say: water can make a person less angry and gloomy. you are coming here with pleasure. the first is, of course, nature. here we are in such a wonderful place, on the border with the beredensky nature reserve, that is, you see, the air is clean, the mood immediately rises. we don't have a radio station. no harmful production, which in turn protects us from the fact that some certain components may be present in the water; our water is completely a product of nature. living force of nature - the brand’s melodic slogan emphasizes the uniqueness of the water produced in a picturesque, life-giving place. i recommend clean, healthy water for everyone to drink. a source of mineral and drinking water is located in close proximity to the berezensky biosphere. carbonated and still, drinking water is extracted from a well 46 m deep, mineral water from a well 230 m deep. each person can touch a drop

about the russian philosopher and great russian patriot. ivan ilyana.adimir ivanovich dali. father alexy slyusarenko has been working here at the philosophy department for more than 20 years. he was born in 1970 in the city of shchastya, lugansk region. finished luhansk pedagogical institute, then the orthodox st. tikhon's university for the humanities, where he defended his ph.d. slowly our enemies and enemies will try to cause maximum harm to russia, they will be interested in russia being weakened, dismembered, dying out, and that ukraine will be the first victim in this series, ilyin also wrote. these are frames from a report from the vesti nedeli program shown on june 1 , 2014. then the residents of the lugansk people's republic... father alexy every day after vespers the service is blessed by a soldier of the people's army; the wooden temple in which he serves is surrounded by tents and barricades. when 2 months ago luhansk residents stormed the sbu building and began building this fortified area on the main street, the priest realized that now hi

figure it out, tomorrow will also be interesting, saturday is not a reason to leave, see you bye philosopher. morning

, how do you like this idea from one modern philosopher, quite professional: philosophy and humor aresophy and humor are the pleasure of thinking differently, when even a simple desk... desk is under suspicion, i will support the first or second thought here, the thought about philosophy and humor, that they are inseparable, if we dig even deeper. into ancient greek comedy and tragedy, then well , essentially comedy is philosophy, comedy motivates to think and reason, and due to comedy, due to paradox, due to the opportunity to look, even within the framework of a short reprise, at the same problem from a different perspective on the other hand, this is a very philosophical concept, philosophy and humor are really satellites, but such polar satellites with contradictions give birth to some kind of movement and dialogue and... yes, such an attitude towards oneself with humor, how important is this for a person, yes it is necessary , it’s just that in general people who don’t treat themselves with a sense of humor are not able to do this, all the same, some kind of heaviness emanates fr

well in i mainly treat this philosophically, since this is the main ukrainian contradiction, between how very well the ukrainian nation behaves, as a community, as such a large square, and between how badly individual representatives and the state bureaucracy behave, and if these are two such realities. and in particular, our problem is extremely huge in that our bureaucratic oligarchic machine is much worse than the soviet bureaucracy, much more ruthless, including in relation to the military, and people they feel this contradiction, that on the one hand there is the best voluntary, civil society, well, the whole people, the whole church has changed. there is a volunteer society and they really help as one family with everything they can, and on the other hand, that there is this merciless machine of some kind, which is much worse than the soviet government, grinding people, and it is clear that people have different emotional reactions , that is why i strongly believe that ukraine immediately needs a rule of law, a rule of law as a system. the topic as something where, accordingly,

as well as enlightenment philosophers. all of whose philosophy was meant to be practical.iting and reflecting. listening, deliberating, leading and especially never wasting time. the founders in their pursuit of happiness were fixated on using reason to master their passions. deploying self-discipline and logic to neutralize problematic emotions like greed, arrogance, lust, anger and fear. creating good habits and avoiding instant gratification resulted in a virtuous life. a life dedicated to unrelenting self-improvement. because a man who could govern himself is capable of self-government. this great american experiment only works when the country is filled with men and women of character, honour, judicious nests and self-sacrifice. so where does that leave us today in 2024? jeffrey rosen's, the pursuit of happyness. how classical writers on virtue inspire the lives of the founders and defined america. it answers that very question we are joined right now. this is one of my favourite books of all time. i know i say that with every book but this time i mean it. why, jeffre

recognize the results of these elections, let’s somehow survive the five circles of political philosophicalssues. and then we will ask ourselves the question of what those people, who knows who, by the way, will have, well, foreign policy, including, why am i telling all this so somewhat dramatically, you know, when we say that all this is in crisis, that's not the word reflects, well, the true state of affairs there, and uh, in general, of course, well, this conflict and what was not achieved so that we began to work by force, leaving us no other choice, well, in general, it began as such a conflict of equals rivals with a vastly overrated illusion of power on their side, but you understand what’s happening, well, here’s 2 years of conflict, and the illusion is eroding, and the number of problems they have... are developing, by the way, i ’m ready to support your creative idea, but in this case these problems develop even without our special participation, because these are not just several americas, as you said here, in fact, these are several nations, yes, several nations, this is much m

i would like to say a quick philosophical point .e, they die, and only this human being can be born once , create himself repeatedly, come alive repeatedly, survive and be influential. okay, and dr. chamran was actually one of these people, dr. chamran is still living and still plays a role in the socio-cultural sphere of our society and the middle east. today's developments in the middle east are in fact, it is the fruit of the seedling that dr. chamran made together with the peshwa and the leader of that day, imam musa sadr, that is, we have an unknown right to talk about the middle east and its issues and developments. dr. chamran was a nuclear scientist who fought, a writer, a philosopher and an ideologue who fought, a lover and an artist. it was when you were fighting, that is , in the text of the fatal incidents and the place where you are and are not, there was no concept of death anymore , dr. chand. imran is actually a human action he could be seen and the dimensions of his personality could be seen . please tell me what to

becoming a vegetable, because my consciousness is all that i have i was, we claim that we, as philosophers give a message to the world where to move, they claim this, they destroy man as such, they don’t need him, they need a certain amount of. the bustle is gone, only the song of the wind specially caresses the ear, so that you look around and realize how quiet it is all around. whenever possible, go to nature, go to forests, fields, rivers and lakes, breathe fresh air. admire the clear sky, listen to the birds singing, the rustling of leaves, smile at the sun. enjoy, notice this beauty around you. in harmony with nature. belarus 24. hello, the program “sas” is being broadcast by its presenter nadezhda sas. greetings. and i remind you that this a program for those who want to better understand what is happening and understand how these processes and events occur. people will affect the life of the country and each of us, is eurasianism a theory or a practice? we will look for the answer to this question in today’s program immediately after the key one. the national democratic alliance, le

most interesting thing here arises that , well, well, we got to the bottom of it, that he is a philosopherdeas come from? after a few minutes of short advertising, let's continue and find out. oleg and yana love each other and are going to get married. unexpectedly, oleg finds out that his beloved girl cheated on him with a foreign businessman. yana leaves for finland. without saying that she is expecting a child from oleg. 10 years later, she suddenly returns to russia and tells oleg about her son. after yana’s divorce from her husband, the finnish guardianship authorities, under a far-fetched pretext , take the boy away from her and send him to a foster family. yana is desperate and oleg agrees to help her get her son back. one chance for three, premiere. watch the time after the program. oldbar cognac is a product of steller group. bourbon storsman is a product of the stellar group. mancacher whiskey is a product of the stellar group. gin Сnop. product of stellar group. monteshoca cognac. product of steller group. vampire ball. rosemary's baby, several more nerve-wracking films made the

but this point of view can be divided. only those who did not read a single work of the philosopher ilyinumbling upon something on the internet. all this hostile fuss there was a lot of excitement around ilyin at the russian state university for the humanities, perhaps for three reasons: first: ilyan is quoted quite often by putin. lyan's compromise ricochets on the president, that's the goal. second, the ilyan center at rsu was headed by one of the most famous and influential contemporary thinkers in russia.

modern philosopher and professor alexander dugin talks about this.hy. this is to be able to understand another, this is the main philosophical problem of our cultural dialogue, the west, how the west understands the other, the west says: the other is me, be like us and no problems, and if the other does not want to become like us, then we declare war on him. "we declare war on gaza, we declare war on russia in ukraine, we declare war on china with its desire for unification, we blame war on those who do not agree with us, this is the problem of another, and brix must offer a completely different philosophy of interaction, this is ours our proposal to the west to leave humanity alone, but he cannot, because he does not know what the other is. so, these days in russia , the brix sports games are taking place, these are the first such competitions, while for some it may even look naive, but no one took the first olympics at the beginning of the last century very seriously either, for example, they say , as a salesman of some local shop, the main candida

a philosophical oint appropriate tax. a philosophical point about _ appropriate tax.her stuff— government has less monitor spend on other stuff -- _ government has less monitor spend on other stuff —— less money to spend. the difference without a distinction. but i think it is an important _ distinction. but i think it is an important philosophical one, they will continue to have rows... it is naive _ will continue to have rows... it is naive to— will continue to have rows... it is naive to hope that happens in an election. — naive to hope that happens in an election, of course, but these numbers— election, of course, but these numbers don't add up without massive public— numbers don't add up without massive public sector reform, efficiencies across _ public sector reform, efficiencies across the — public sector reform, efficiencies across the piece, a different discussion about how we fund and operate _ discussion about how we fund and operate the nhs, and instead we have a row— operate the nhs, and instead we have a row about— operate the nhs, and instead we have a

dostoevsky, mikhailovsky, well, all at once, and kant, which means he decided to create his own philosophicalart, can be published, tried in a newspaper, and he took and took the odessa news to the newspaper, where these pages disappeared like... . is art possible for art and he signed the literary name korney chukovsky from his mother’s surname, and this is how a writer appeared for the first time, and these are crocodiles, this is the first fairy tale, the first fairy tale, the first big fairy tale, the first big fairy tale, this. sixteenth, probably, but in your opinion, how is it that a person who starts out as a philosopher, a critic, a journalist, well, suddenly turns around like that and writes fairy tales for children, like a writer, how can you explain this psychologically? , but i can’t explain this psychologically in any way, because i understand that karniy ivanovich himself didn’t understand where he gets it from, when they start asking where you get books, scientifically, here’s my husband, he could explain where he gets the book from , these are well-read, which means bookshelv

just afraid of becoming a vegetable, because my consciousness is all i had, we claim that we, as philosophershe world where to move, they claim this, they destroy man as such, he not needed, they need it a certain number of people who will have a certain amount of resources. all others are being replaced by artificial intelligence, this is not a conspiracy theory. the markov project is nothing personal. watch on tv channel belarus 24. hello, belarus has made its mark this week in distant corners, in mongolia and our brotherly russia in irkutsk. the effect of alexander lukashenko’s visit in the medium term alone is estimated at tens of millions of dollars; much more important, of course, is the special level of trust between countries. we stand for ourselves we are sure that at home we confirm the characteristic feature of belarusians, hospitality. the festival in grodno brought together dozens of peoples on one site, all somehow coexisting peacefully and cheerfully. this does not fit into today's western politics at all. from the other side there were statements about a nuclear race. weapons,

. there are times when philosophers also become fighters, help me, let's see, okay, let's see, you'rell kill the shepherd. he is your enemy, he is your goal, work. great, that's it, let's go, here, here, come on! take a position, here, dasha, where is seryozha? it didn't work, why? i don’t know, nurali, he took him somewhere, where else? i don’t know, but this is dangerous, everything that noraline does is always dangerous, i ’m so tired of it, maryam, are you fire, are you dreaming of birds? and my parents are almost every night, you know how everyone loved me, and i loved them, my brother rolled me on motorcycles, position, lying down, everyone take a position, get ready, come here, fire, in 3 days, what happened, we would have gone to the circus in our hearts, you know, so mobile, clowns, monkeys, a bear on a bicycle, i laughed so much, and then the acropaths left, they began to show somersaults in the air, and i fell in love with one of them, it was so beautiful, a slender suit, my jackpots were burning so much, i myself was red as a tomato, then everyone asked me, mar, are you si

the spiritual leader of eurasianism is considered to be the russian philosopher, publicist and historianthing that happened to us over many years or centuries, and those unrealized opportunities that existed, were largely a consequence of the european flux that the russian empire suffered from, and then subsequently the bolsheviks who came to power, and after all the cataclysms with the collapse union, and it is this disease that, unfortunately, we have adopted in many ways and... this is doom or something about western priorities, views, assessments, what princess marya alekseevna will say in front of princess marya alekseevna , everything else, these are deeply ingrained things, you quite rightly note, this is reflected in our knowledge of, say, eastern cultures, famous people there, of course people who know this, for the majority... this is terra incognito, well, the thing is that today we are talking about a multipolar world, in this multipolar world - we need to understand one thing, it seems to me, important, that for us, for for russia, for belarus, for countries that have grown

our lives, we hear how god answers our prayers, this is the strongest proof that he exists, no philosophicallogical reasoning on the topic of whether there is a god or not is not interesting to us, let those who care about it do it... it is a great joy for me to set foot on the soil of paraguay, as many, many of our compatriots did in the difficult post-revolutionary years. and when i was wondering which country i was from i need to start traveling around south america, then my heart told me that i need to do this from paraguay. i have a special feeling for latin america, because here they maintain a fairly high level of religiosity and all that. the continent has enormous potential, spiritual potential. that is why i believe that it is very important to develop russia’s bilateral relations with latin american countries so as not to repeat each other’s mistakes. may god bless paraguay and its people with peace and prosperity. we must try to actualize everything what we learn through the gospel, through the word of preaching in our lives. when leaving solovki island, boarding a ship or plane,

just afraid of becoming a vegetable, because my consciousness is all i had, we claim that we, as philosophers give a message to the world where to move, they claim this, they destroy man as such, he not needed, they need a certain number of people who will have a certain... industrial park vyaliki stone international exhibition belagra we know the debutants to the market. serve radzema war-patryatychny camp sustrakae cadet month zletu barysau. minsk, in the national system, is covered with belarusian mats , covering the kastrychnitsa square at the palace of the republic. new harvesters and tractors, hybrid electric vehicles. ramonok is a precision seeding seeder for sowing beetroot, corn, the seeder has eight or 12 rare seeds, with the ability to also apply fertilizers with seeding devices of our own production, altai, kaluga, lipetsk, voronezh, stavropol, that is, these are all the regions that we we'll meet you at to present our entire products at this exhibition. belagra - geta and multi- tasting tasting. our kopol branch is famous for its cheeses; today we are working to increase the volu

jesse you're such a philosopher. are you sure you're not greek? n >> nope. english, irish, scottish and welsh. but we have a greek lady on myo staff. >>we also five italians and two jews and three double three spaniards. i got to go. i'm getting myself into a lot tg of trouble. >> that's all for tonight. hannity is next. this is myht h t on world.

turned to pushkin, this year marks the 225th anniversary of the birth of our great poet, writer, philosophera. well, why only soviet? the appeal to pushkin began long before soviet cinema arose. yes, even before cinema appeared, because the year of birth of russian cinema was 1908, when the first film made in russia by russian filmmakers for russian viewers was released. here's the first one. the film based on pushkin was made in 1907, it just never came out and they thought that either the actors let us down, or the technology let us down, and these were scenes from boris godunov, which were released later, moreover, it was a sound film in an era when cinema was just beginning and was not popular, it was a film shot under film recitation, that is , a film was playing on the screen, actors stood behind the screen, most often those who were also on the screen, in fact, every time at every screening. in one of these films, the main role was played by ivan mazhukhin, probably the biggest star of russian cinema, who in in general, appeared more than once in film adaptations of pushkin, an exampl

loved russia very much and at the same time scolded it mercilessly, sergeevich pushkin, to his philosophical you. and sergei solovyov, today we are talking about pyotr yakolevich chiodaev. by the origin of education, chaudaev, of course, refers to this very often; they write that he belongs to the circle of decembrists. this is true. this is true, there are a lot of similarities here, although, as we will see later, he still went his own way, his own way, he was not, he was in some ways similar to the decembrists, in some ways he was very independent. a nobleman, he studied at moscow state university, attended lectures on philosophy together with his friend, the famous decembrist yakushkin, and griboyedov. by the way, there is a version that... the prototype is chadsky in mount atum copied directly from chadayev, indeed similar in some ways. in the war of 812, he participated in the same way as most of the decembrist leaders, and not only did he participate, he actively participated, he took part in the battle of borodino, near maloyaroslavl, in fact , chadayev took part in all the most impo

chernich, look, i have one more question that is absolutely philosophical, psychological, no, no, notspecific at all, well, i also remember my daughter, who recently studied in tartu, now in one russian professor was already arrested and sentenced in tartu, he did not teach my wife, my wife, my daughter. but she has friends whom he taught, he says: a very qualified, intelligent, knowledgeable person, after all, such a scientist is real, well, but recruited, as was proven by estonian counterintelligence, russian intelligence, but this plume is spoiling the reputation of all russians, here's my question, it's just me talking about it, relatively speaking, i study in berlin, i open a newspaper, it says that the professor at the university of otvar is a russian intelligence officer, i have a lecture by some russian, about whom i do not know if he is a spy, and even everyone says that he is not a spy. but i already suspect him, i begin to think about any russian, professor, worker, peasant, farmer, cleaner, and whether you are not a spy, and whether you are not spoiling the lives of europe

these protestant this nker starting point the philosophical principle that god is perfect and unchangingn christians debate about whesnerally explicit in scripture. it's not clear that it is, but conservatives said that if that's true, it follows logically that god's revelation is perfect and unchanging as well, not just in matters of salvation, but inific and historical matter from the scope of the flood to the most granular of ancient israel's politics. so what this means is that religioustruth are the same. thes both matters. benjamin warfield, mentor at princeton, a theologian named charles hodge, had a great of putting this, he said. the bible is a storehouse of fat. let's think about that se facts. and aarrange and harmonize these factss the laws nature by arranging data from the natural world. he's really saying a theologian is a kind scienti and this i think, really drives home the point that tse follow that model of you about. a couple of weeks ago and how they thought about. about using your god given common sense to make sense of the data. god's creation very diff ferent view

their position, because their whole position in the culture there, someone proclaims himself a philosopherone else, it is based on... the fact that they are trying to take place in this strange place, i would say to the world, because russia is already foreign to them, they already believe that that they cannot be part of the russian microcosm, the ukrainian language and culture, they they can't, i'm sorry, there already, there they already shunned their own not of such quality and not such a bottle, well, in ukrainian culture, i would say they also cannot happen, than in ukrainian civilization, because... they don't just treat to her with an appeal, this does not mean that people do not know the ukrainian language, they can know, they are left with this small island, her life, which means russian-speaking ukraine, uh, it should be preserved for them, you understand, not for people on the street, for them, for all these respectable people, politicians, philosophers, i don't know, writers, here you go, you again, again we return to our unfinished dialogue, like... it was called a jar, yes,

their position, because their whole position in the culture, there, someone proclaims himself a philosophermeone else, it is based on the fact that they are trying to take place in this strange well, i would say to the world, because russia is already foreign to them, they already believe that they cannot be part of the russian microcosm. the ukrainian language and culture still evokes them and they can't, i'm sorry, there already, there they already have their own people who are not of such quality and not of such quality, well, in ukrainian culture, i would say they can't happen either, than in ukrainian civilization, because they just look down on it, it doesn't mean that people don't know the ukrainian language, they can know, they only have this little island , a life that means russian-speaking ukraine, it is needed. you are for them, you understand, not for the people on the street, for them, for all these respectable people, politicians, philosophers, i don't know, writers, here you go, you again, again we return to our unfinished dialogue, what was the name of that restaurant jar,