williams, united states navy. [bell] major duane williams, united states army.petty officer marvin roger woods, united states navy, retired. [bell] captain john d. yemnicki senior, united states navy, retired. [bell] vicki yancy. [bell] petty officer second class kevin w. yokum, united states navy. [bell] chief petty officer donald m. young, united states navy. [bell] edmund g. young junior. [bell] lisa l. young. [bell] shu yen yung. [bell] and her husband. [bell] >> ♪ amazing grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me i once was lost but now i am found twas blind but now i see >> ♪ amazing grace amazing grace amazing grace the lord hath promised good to me, his word my hope secures; he will my shield and portion be as long as life endures. when we've been there ten thousand years, bright shining as the sun, we've no less days to sing god's praise >> ♪ amazing grace >> ♪ the lord hath promised good to me, his word my hope secures; he will my shield and portion be as long as life endures. ♪ >> ♪ amazing grace amazing grace ♪ ♪ >> ladies and gentlemen,

the united states.stados unidos se presenta a sí mismo como el garante de los derechos humanos, del respeto al derecho internacional, the united states presents itself as the guarantee of human rights of respect for international. law of customs of relations between countries, however, this standard bearer of democracy, democracy that seems to be kind of ointment, sad that heals everything, presents its own democracy before the eyes of the world, however, in practice, its actions show us that this country, which is nothing but empire, does things that are completely against the principles it proclaims. to talk about this behavior of the united states, we are today with jose partiera, we're with him from the united states. he's a cuban lawyer, specialist in migration and human rights issues. he was the defender, this is very important, of the five cubans unjustly in the united states. predict all these principles, according to your knowledge, how do you describe this phenomenon? well, first of all, is it

the united states, the u. k. europeans are not the ones paying the price ukrainians are paying the price. russians are paying the price and the long term costs of this. i think you're just devastated. like we need peace there. you know, that doesn't mean i've been very clear. vladimir putin as an aggressor. i think he was wrong in attracting ukraine. but we have to recognize allied leaders, united states, europe, nato, all shares of layman this. they were utterly irresponsible expansion of nato. and despite the assurances they made to the contrary, despite the knowledge they had for people like birds, that this was an incendiary issue is a big issue of extraordinary importance to russia. that essentially we are fighting to destroy russia by sacrificing ukrainian lives. i think it's disgusting. i think it's an also policy and over the long term, it's a destabilizing policy. we need to get the war over. i think that requires the us and europeans to talk to russia. it needs to your what kind of a new security str

maybe because in the united states , there are enough of them on the continental part of the united stateszens of them, according to some data, even hundreds, well, let's say dozens, because we do not know the actual technical combat condition of these machines, of course they are not new there , maybe even since the cold war, but they can be restored , it would have been possible to restore them, after all, it was not the first day of the war. and the united states could transfer to ukraine 25, for example, patriot complexes, which would in principle cover the main ukrainian facilities and territory, and if we transferred even more, then we could safely ensure virtually guaranteed protection of ukrainian territory, with a high probability, protection of ukrainian territory from russian ballistic missiles and not only missiles. unfortunately, it is logical to explain to me what argument to find... why the united states ignores transfers to ukraine of the patriot system, which the armed forces of the united states do not need at all, i just emphasize, they stand on the continental part of t

of america more than netanyahu wants a regional war, trust me on this, it's not the united states doesn't want war, no, biden wants more before he leaves, he wants to engage because he want to sustain the united states of america control of the region, they don't want to be bleeded out bit by bit in this war of attrrion, in the the which is happening in west age and in ukraine as well, and the united states of america will start slow. losing power, they want to direct massive blows in the region right now, the americans want and that's why they pushing netanyahu to rick havick in in the region, but seeing saying that the resistance itself, the palestinian one is directing massive blows of the israeli army, and the same thing in lebanon, and the the the the attack of all, which is the response of hizballah against the... end of killing his commander uh ali shukr uh which is hit unit 8200 and it killed its own the leader of that unit now this news were saying a week ago the guy is missing the guys may be going to resign but today there is news of he's been killed assassinated in tha

the president of the united states.d like to share with you and the people of the world my thoughts a subject of great importance to the cause of peace. relations between the united states and the soviet union, protests against his war-mongering policies didn't let him keep playing his previous role for a long time. in order to put an end to all that, the soviet authorities were urged to help those people come to power who could negotiate with reagan and dissuade him from following that strategy. pipes had predicted that the next leader would be a reformist. thatcher had chosen gorbacev and had shared her idea with reagan. after chernenko's death, all the predictions came true. now it was time for the third stage of the strategy. after gorbachev took office, the noise blocking devices were no longer needed, because there was no more static. everything was changing very fast. not only the radio stations were doing what reagan wanted, but also many newspapers, some of which took money from the united states were doing the

out because polls in the united states, most americans in the united states favour a palestinian state. i mean, clear now that your uh, full, my boss is only option is to join the united states in to this conflict and iran and not biting of not being biting since the israeli assassination of as well. any a and the what, what is this real going to do when the united states? the, whether it be this generation or the next is good by israel. we hate israel because of what israel does is regards human rights violations. we are quite capable of defending ourselves by ourselves. lay. ready sorry to jump so quickly, but you're not value because that's why the americans are giving you tens of billions or hundreds of millions of dollars weapons without the united states. you are, you don't have a country. i don't think so. if you look at the united states, the defense age, to nature, to south korea, to japan, it's 100 times where the are doing with his with, with this right? small rock security corporation, they enjoy our technology. they're enjoy our strategic and tactical lead. um, i would say

the territory of the united states, neighbors, that is, canada and mexico, from whom the united states is going to defend itself, so it is not clear, this is a tactical system, this is an army system on the scale of the united states, they use for anti-missile defense, including ballistic, completely different systems, petrio is not even located there the nomenclature of these anti-missile systems, so ... i think the idea is to somehow, in any way, persuade biden, with the help of melons, with the help of any arguments, that the united states could transfer these systems to us , i think that they should be used now, for example, i even advocated such a project, transfer to europe, to european countries, for example, romania and poland, transfer 30 systems. they can then be restored and gradually transferred to ukraine, it would be better than just talking about what romania is transferring to us there the single patriot air defense complex, or poland and romania should shoot down some aerial objects over ukrainian territory, well , you know it all, it's delaying, it's confusing the sit

williams, united states navy. [bell] major dwayne williams, united states army. chief petty officer marvin roger woods, united states navy, retired. [bell] captain john d. yamnicky sr., united states navy, retired. vicki yancey. [bell] petty officer second class kevin w. yokum, united states navy. [bell] chief petty officer donald m. young. united states navy. [bell] edmond g. young jr. [bell] lisa l. young. [bell] shu yin young. [bell] and her husband yuguang zheng. [bell] >> ♪ amazing grace how sweet the sound that saved a wretch like me i once was lost but now am found was blind but now i see ♪ twas that grace that taught my heart fear and grace my fear relieved how precious did that grace appear the hour i first believed amazing grace how sweet the lord has promised good to me his word my hope secures he will my sin and portion keep as long as light endures ♪ through many dangers toils and snares i have already come tis grace has brought me safe thus far and grace will lead me home ♪ amazing grace amazing grace ♪♪ >> ladies and gentlemen, please stand for the

and so therefore i do believe a ground invasion is possible again, if not simply to bring the united states uh fully in on on the side of of the apartide state of israel. that's right, mr. yahubian. mr. jones, as mr. yahuban is saying, do do you think uh will the us be able to, i mean israel be able to uh drag the us into lebanon, i mean uh, us foot soldiers on lebanese soil. well, that's that's a very big question. uh, i don't know if "the us military would be prepared to do that, you've seen even um pullback from them with regard to the escalation of the situation in ukraine by uh by opposing the notion of long-range weapons going into ukrainian hands, so people who are fighting the war generally are not the ones who are most in favor of the war, it's your political elites, those who don't wear the uniform, who are willing..." to do that and unfortunately they will be making the decision, it it's a very dicey situation uh if it leads to an all-out war in the middle east uh the us somehow uh will either have to step in as eisenhower did once upon a time uh in the uh the suez crisis uh or i

the united states military didn't do that that was a decision made by the united states. but nonetheless, those who went, those who sacrificed, and particularly those families who lost loved ones there, i can't begin to understand part of it. i would words of mind would be cheap and tawdry to try to get into that space. but i do believe it was a good cause i do believe that they went they fought well and bravely and did as well as we could, given a very difficult difficult set of circumstances as those who did. they fought in vietnam in an earlier generation. you know, all wars aren't pretty. all wars aren't perfect. but the american military and the fighting men and women who go out and do the nation's bidding, we don't get to pick those wars. and if we don't like them, perhaps remedies back here in the united states involving elections that we should approach in order to change people who actually do make those decisions. thank you. good answer. i want to ask you also, you spoke about this in some of the other interviews that you've done about the israeli prosecution of

united states is great. you know, we're like the drunk fat change. smoking mother in law tried to order everybody else around and tell them what to do and the world's tired. they want to be left alone. they want to do their own business. and the united states just sort of sit down, it shut up instead of meddling. but that's what, you know, we can't help themselves. all right, we're gonna leave it there. larry johnson, former c i a analyst, the ceo of berg associates, larry, great to have you on as always. good evening, rachel. the is really prime minister, has rebuffed the statements that his government is close to securing a ceasefire with him off. benjamin netanyahu claims the gods and militant group keeps sabotaging this prospects of a deal, but as well as american allies insist and agreement is already within reach. these strips that we've had over the last couple of months where it's been extraordinary work done to yeah, to get a framework agreement that both parties signed onto then to work, to fill in

out because polls in the united states show most americans in the united states favour a palestinian state. i mean, clear now that your uh, full, my boss is the only option is the drawer, the and i, it states in to this conflict and iran are not biting, have not been biding since the israeli assassination of, as well. any, uh and uh, what, what does this real going to do when the united states? uh, whether it be this generation or the next is good by israel. we have israel because of what israel does is regards human rights violations. we are quite capable of sending our sales by our sales weight. ready sorry to jump so quickly, but you're not valued because that's why the americans are giving you tens of billions or hundreds of millions of dollars weapons without the united states. you are you, you don't have a country. i don't think so. if you look at the united states as defense, age to nature, to south korea, to japan, it's 100 times where the are doing with is with is right. it's more security corporation. they enjoy our technology, their enjoy, our strategic and tactical lead.

so we should all call on the united states. don't pray with the fire sides, right? but for the us supporting taiwan also means keeping all the key alliances in the region and promoting democracy. if china were to invade an annex taiwan, we would see that democracy extinguish and eclipse and showing effects to democracies around the world. you will have deep questions being asked in south korea, japan and the philippines on whether they can rely on the united states for their security. because of where taiwan is and what it represents. neither china nor the us are able to back down. and the rest of us are stuck watching the super power arrival, replay out the the most, the full stake nature, awful grunts is. we don't think much about the trees all around us, for example. well, either way, gone. it would be a disaster. they provide so many services, socio economic and above all environmental trees and forest of 5 to, to the health of the planet. i would need to protect them. i am curriculum. so illegals, like.

mcconnell, republican leader of the united states senate.: -- >> ryan knauss was a history try buff and his wife rermts him as a fixer and he was a soldier. max sov inch ak was a high school football captain with a great spirit. he was a corpsman. humberto sanchez was a team patriot who left smiles on their faces. at afghanistan he was a marine. hunter lopez following his parents as career law enforcement. in afghanistan, he was a marine. at afghanistan, he was a marine. rylee mccull umh was a marine. a giant, a legend. she was a marine. david espinoza was a loyal son who played with toy solders. at afghanistan, he was a marine. taylor hoover was an uncle with a contagious laugh. in afghanistan he was a moore even. a happy go-lucky kid. in afghanistan. he was a marine. johnny row share yeoh p inch car at ag was a marine. a thirst for life, he was a marine. dylan m emp rmp ola hospitalized to study engineering in college. at afghanistan, he was a marine. a soldier corpsman and 11 marines served their country to help people in desperate need.

but when it comes to strategic industries we have to build a capability either in the united states orbetween the nine states are democratic allies should be able to make sure we can produce critical minerals, critical medicines, critical high-technology products in the united states or countries reaffirm iraq solid alliances with pickwick to specifically say not decoupling this it ministration's been not saying the couplet donald trump of course is for 60% tariffs on all goods coming from china. when you consider the economic relationships are terse and appropriate be using? democrats include this administration. [inaudible] tariffs are completely legitimate very important and effective tool. i think for a long time we looked at tariffs and trade policy as a way to try to convince china to behave differently. i think it is pretty clear china is on a committed and uncontested pappy will continue to cheat for they will continue to steal intellectual property. they'll continue to dump products on the international market. so today with tariffs and trade policy are probably more effective

and there isn't really a rule for the united states or other industrialized countries in that. so why is taiwan so important to beijing then to understand, let's dive back into history. china lost control over taiwan during what it calls the century of humiliation. these caricature is, of china being carved up by various foreign powers might explain why. from the mid 19th until the mid 20th century china was played by invasions and internal disputes . this is important because that notion of humiliation still plays a big role in chinese state ideology even today. in 1895 japan took taiwan from china and made it a colony after world war 2, the allies forced japan to give it back. but at the time, china was in the middle of a civil war. the government, if the republic of china or r o c was led by nationalists under chanc kashik, the now is that don't lead communist forces against them. in 1949, the victorious communists marched into beijing and established the people's republic of china on the mainland. the defeated government of the republic of china fled to taiwan. that's why t

strategy and plan deserve. for attention, he supports the position of the representative of the united states at the organization of the united nations. victory plan for roman petrovich, yes. i think this is the starting point for our analysis. we understand that this is an extremely ambitious application side of ukraine. we will hope that the united states will adhere to all points of this plan. but, as the classics said, option b is also possible. well, taking into account the fact that some moment. may be uncovered by the united states, we want to believe that everything will go smoothly, but we understand that real politics, unfortunately, sometimes prompts very unpleasant decisions. and in this situation , the most interesting thing is that neither the official discussion of this document in the united states of america is already underway, nor the writing of it in kyiv so and did not end with the fact that at least... some conceptual drafts of this document would be seen in ukraine or made public, what do analysts use today? by the fact that they take parts of this document from the int

diplomats of the united states of america will become active. this shows that the united states of america in cooperation with the zionist regime from various sources in the military field, we are witnessing that in some way it is constantly feeding this regime and replenishing its tanks with military equipment in the operational field and helping in the command and operational discussion. in the field of war, in the field of intelligence the satellites of the united states of america and western countries are completely at the disposal of the zionist regime and they can help it in the field. even the information of the news sources that they have in the technological field , that is, all the discussions of cyberspace are accompanied by the use of new technologies that everyone is using mobile phones and such discussions, and this shows that the united states of america is not only aware he is not, but as a colleague, and sometimes he is the operator of many operations in the united states of america, that is, himself the presenter there is, but

the president met with the leaders of the united states of america, with the president of the united states, joe biden, with the vice president and democratic candidate kamala harris, and in the end, he still managed to meet with another candidate for the position of the president of the united states , donald trump, even after a certain scandal in general , during this meeting, the president presented a victory plan, met, by the way, also with congressmen and senators, had meetings with the defense industry of the united states of america, well, in short, a lot, a lot of things. mr. vitaly, if we summarize like this first, how do you characterize this visit, relatively speaking, was the victory plan, as they say, positively presented, did this trick work with him, and are you talking about the victory plan again, mr. andrii, and you? noticed that in the last days of the visit , almost nothing was said about the victory plan, but no one spoke anymore, that's exactly why i'm asking you, how would you describe all that happened in the context of this, well, that's what we're talking abo

i know think they have a free trade deal is the united states with. the united states? yes they have more a free trade agreements than think any other asian countries. so what does that what does that entail? what that mean to have a free trade agreement? yes. that they have. no no or less tariffs and that they have not so much restrictions that even now, if you feel that something is not okay, you can go to an international court and sue them and they will accept it. vietnam, there's a difference in china. you can't do it they will never accept if an international will say this was but they accept it. so this is another thing they are more free than china and china they had also a great story with thanks to helping the eighties their start is the free market reforms but now with chuchu ping it goes back in the wrong direction. mark less state. and so there's a there's a slogan escape from china and they go to vietnam now because it's small free also freedom of speech of course it's not as it is here in the united states or europe, but it's more free than in china. for

this was announced by the president of the united states of america, joseph biden. let's listen. we publish a joint declaration. on supporting the recovery and reconstruction of ukraine, to clearly state that we will support ukraine now and in the future. everything will start from the battlefield. i am determined to provide ukraine has what it needs to win and fight for survival. tomorrow i will announce a series of actions to accelerate support for the ukrainian military. but we know that the future victory of ukraine is something more. than what happens on the battlefield. it is also about what ukrainians are doing to make the most of their free and independent future. zelensky spoke before the un security council and the un general assembly and said that western countries should force the aggressor country russia to make peace. the press secretary of the kremlin dmytro piskov immediately stated that neither russia nor russia can supposedly be forced to make peace, well, zelensky spoke quite carefully and diplomatically in the un general assembly and at the security council as

out because polls in the united states show most americans in the united states favour a palestinian state. i mean, clear now that your uh full, my boss is only option is to join the united states in to this conflict and they run, i don't bicycle have not been biding since the israeli assassination of as well. any a and the, or what, what does israel going to do when the united states, the, whether it be this generational, the next is good by israel. we have israel because of what israel does as regards human rights violations. we are quite capable of defending ourselves by ourselves. lay. ready sorry to jump so quickly, but you're not value because that's why the americans are giving you tens of billions or hundreds of millions of dollars weapons without the united states. you are you, you don't have a country. i don't think so. if you look at the united states, the defense 8 to nature, to south korea, to japan, each 100 times what the are doing with is with, with these rights more security corporation, they enjoy our technology, their enjoy, our strategic and tactical that i didn't

the president of the united states, the united i united states, the united states have long standingiden administration has spent a lot of time courting prime minister modi of india. they have a very solid relationship but i think this is simply a gesture that there is a comfort level across there is a comfort level across the four of them and it is a reflection of the deepening conversations, regional conversations, regional conversations, that they are having across japan, australia and india and the united states. i, i, i, , , i i, states. you mention how special and important — states. you mention how special and important india _ states. you mention how special and important india is _ states. you mention how special and important india is to - states. you mention how special and important india is to the - and important india is to the united states. we remember only a couple of months ago we saw the renter modi in moscow hugging vladimir putin and putin calling modi my dearest friend. is that a problem for the us? it friend. is that a problem for the us? , i, i, , i, the us? i

that he met with the current president and with the candidates for the post of president of the united states. because the ukrainian president doesn't really have a big political choice, if he doesn't go to the session of the un general assembly before the presidential elections in the states, he shows disrespect for the current administration, right? i did not come not to meet you, because they do not know whether you will win, and what you did for me, for my country for four years in a row, is not of great importance, i will talk to the winner, so impossible, especially since we understand that in the composition of whose administration. there is a person who absolutely has a chance to win the presidential elections on november 5. so, you are coming to the session of the un general assembly in any case. if you are coming, of course you should keep a balance and meet not only with the current president, but also with the candidates for the position of the president of the united states. and ukrainian presidents have always tried to do this. and it was not always possible, you remember that i

in the united states. but i think all of this really means that the united states is a weak and vulnerable country that has lost its confidence, this empire, which used to be a governing or aspire to govern the world and sought above and beyond. everyone else now is fearful of, uh, a website or a telegram channel, or uh, youtube channel on a satellite television channel. uh and it tears that it could undermine the country if, if it's that bad. and then i think they really have to rethink what the united states actually is, or what sort of country it is and what sort of place it has in the world today. and it's something that he was heading to, and with his promise that washington will be with len plus the aggressive and counts we can disrupting any attempts by whether it be a wrong russia or china to allegedly metal. and it's elections that does this sound like a threat to you, or it's a threat to ordinary americans, i'm sure because gradually they will be trying to put fear into the hearts of the ordinary

these really requests for united states is unlikely to happen because the united states to once to maintain its relationship with of africa in order to come to the influence of russia and china main science. and when it gets hit on the t up next, it's documented to read time and make sure you join us again. some more news updates and 30 minutes see them the, the the, what about the home spreadsheet? because if i did, here's my oldest by the name of my god, i'm wading through that all the point where you slows, ma'am finally. and then one. uh yes or no. those are their students goes to the news of them. i know that the angel shows for dc do you see the .

>> well, the united states has benefited from a post world war ii order in which broadly we do not haveor state on major state conflict right we still have conflict in this world but we should not take for graduated the fact for the last 70 years, we have not seen semiregular globalcat cat cataclysms not just because there are americans alive today but didn't have to fight in conflicts but our economy could sell to the world in the absence of the global conflict, second, those markets that are available to the united states overseas are available to us because of that rule based order because it is not just a system of political rules. but it is a system of economic rules as well that by and large allow for a fair, economic floor for american companies. there are millions of americans who are at work today because their companies sell to the world and they sell to the world because of the set of rules that countries live by. so if you sort of recede back into a preworld war ii environment where there are regular conflicts between large states, that comes at a cost in american lives, and

it's because of the united states, and why is the united states doing this? what it's for jew political reasons is writers on our lives united states and is ready to be continued to dictate that relationship with the united states to the by that research that has committed itself on the very beginning that i think these assignments administration, that it was started on condition that he behind was read, it was, she did it for apartment, it were finances. and if there's looking at that question, is there a kind of sign at least this year? but secondly, before that, and you political terms and terms, all, it's going to put the world power to stand the regional powers on notice restaurant . you want to try and i have to pay attention that the united states will support is or through the end, whether it's general side, whether it is mass that or against the news, whether it's best, wireless is human rights in the west, then the united states will continue to stand behind this highlight. so china is on put on notice in the question of taiwan. you queen, of course

there is a danger that the united states has placed weapons on satellites after all.n be of any type, up to and including tungsten pins. you just have to launch it in the right direction, then it gains hypersonic speed under the influence of gravity. and when it collides with the planet's surface, a lot of energy will be released. this is a serious weapon. and a tungsten pin fly by right into putin's head, how tempting such a prospect is, yes, we can't live with such dreams. so, what do we have in the end, how do people react to it, and what do they think about it? well, they react to it in the same way as they reacted to all the previous ones, because i repeat once again, nothing new, all this has already been heard 100 million times, and the fact that somewhere in some wallet in russia there is something on... there is nothing critical changes, moreover, it is necessary to understand that some weapons are provided to ukraine, they are not provided, as a rule, this is not determined by these with all the rhetorical techniques that russia uses, and this is precisely t

united states.need these letters for a fairy tale, in the 39th kingdom, the thirtieth state. indeed, they gradually came to power, so we laughed at bush, but bush, in theory , the younger bush was already a great president, i met him, i liked the man.

this was in all mass media, of course in the united states of america.esident of ukraine of refusing to conclude an agreement with russia, which allegedly led to the destruction of the country. let's listen to this fairly sharp statement of the candidate from the republican party for the presidency elections in the usa. what do you have left now? three years of terrible fighting, the country is completely destroyed, millions and millions of people, including all these distinguished soldiers, are dead, these magnificent buildings with golden baths are destroyed and lie in ruins, you will never see any cities or towns again, never, they never will restored, they are all destroyed, except kyiv, they were thousands of years old, just think, 3 years ago you... had a beautiful civilization, now most of the country is gone, so many people died, many people went to poland, to hungary, to other places, they will never return, by the way, this is what he said just a few days ago, and today he already announced on the air of the fox news channel that i will definit

what is the united states approach of this? before you answer let me note i'm sure everyone in this room you've seen the interview we did was secretary of state mallory stewart about this question. she said the united states would be interested in engaging with a china on the dialogue but have many questions about what their proposal at this. if you could elaborate on that and tell us why that's an opportunity to engage with china in the days and weeks ahead? what, i am happy to expand on mallory's answer there. i want to note these types of discussions i been a topic of five our experts are arms control experts have been tip of this fear trying to engage the prc, russia and allies on a regular basis on the topics. for that prc to really want to engage on this topic it would make sense for them to try to initiate a more serious discussion which we do not shy away from. we are not afraid to engage on these issues that is why we have been the ones asking for the engagement. if the prc is interested in making a specific proposal on

we did what the united states of america did back in 1996. honestly don't understand. their complaints, they themselves always said with a smile at all meetings: you have a caveat attitude to nuclear weapons, and we have an extended deterrence, how many doctrines, how many concepts, well, now get your concepts in a mirror version. for the sake of fairness, there are still no complaints from washington, as there are none, and no official comments. petty political leaders. i would say political scientists say. the baltics basically said that putin is swinging the nuclear club, swinging it again, if the west doesn't hear it, then no one else will, the west hasn't heard it, let's be honest, let's admit it, i didn't hear it, i didn't hear it so much that, well, you see, they're crying right now, how can they there, maybe they haven’t woken up yet, maybe because of that they didn’t have time to write how they fear us, whine about... all these propagandists are russian, but they didn’t wake up a long time ago, because the most interesting thing is t

of america. to the president of the united states , joseph biden, and it will happen after september 25, when the un general assembly begins. mr. alexander, do you know? the content of this document, have you seen the draft of this document, because since it is not just zelensky's victory plan, it is a victory plan for ukraine and ukrainians, as a ukrainian, for example, i am interested to know what is in this victory plan? well, i don't see. that there is a peace formula of president zelenskyi, which is very specific in nature, if it is specifically about this victory plan, then i am not sure that it should be made public, maybe, well , he has the right to know about this plan, about the details of this plan only that circle, let's say our allies, partners, from on whom does the help to ukraine depend, that is, it is possible even there... some secret things that should not be brought out so that the enemy does not know, for example, does not, does not use this knowledge, that is, i am very concerned. before i tell you, let's say so, about the openness of this plan, well, you speak

and that would be the united states accepting it. that would be a disaster for international law, for the rule of law, and would send a horrible message to the middle east in the pacific. that if you just wait the americans out sooner or later than they'll give them and you can get, accomplish your political objectives. with military force, i think that would be an unambiguous disaster for europe and united states and international security. let me ask before you run out of time the, the future, the fate of this war. how much of it depends on the outcome of election day in november in the united states? you know, there's a term in american politics. i used to teach american politics at west point. among other things has been elections matter. you hear that in a wash and lot. i think us policy toward ukraine in europe and russia, and there is very, there's 2, they're very different. the policies on offer here. when you look in some regions, you think 81 administration might be a little stronger. you look in your, i think i hear some m

the united states did not.ident roosevelt at that time suggested it, the private broadcasters, abc, mutual radio, they probably, cbs protested if theve government got involved in broadcasting it would cut into their listenership, their audience, plus there was always the fear and we have that in the unitedgo states somehow governmt broadcaster can't be trusted which i frankly think is not necessarily the case but that's a different story one we could debate, if you wish. so the view, it started only, only after the attack on pearl harbor and it was really the world war ii that created voice of america and it functioned very importantly. it's first war in german were we will bring you the news, we will tell you what happened whether it's good for us or not and probably established itself very quickly as very dependable. we would talk about losses, something that most countries would never broadcast that we lost a battle or we have great difficulties wherever that may be and coming out of world war ii, there was

a coalition between the united states, australia and india, and there is a strong alliance over the united states. it is also one of the very few countries who includes and defines the entire indian ocean region, including africa and the indo pacific on framing and strategy. in a way others do not, like the u.s. yet, japan is really discussed as an indian ocean player, so, today, we are looking at the indo pacific within japan's priorities. more importantly, if there is space and value in reframing the engagement to better reflect the importance of the region, to help us break down some of these questions, i'm absolutely delighted to have two exceptional scholars and thinkers whose work i follow closely and learn from. i will briefly introduce both. and washington, d.c., is not unfamiliar with either, but thank you first line out from tokyo overnight and joining us to do this in person. dr. zach cooper is a senior fellow where he studies u.s. strategy in asia and teaches at princeton university and is the chair of the board of the open technology fund, and is writing a book for yale univer

this is what kamala harris, a possible future president of the united states, said. ukraine in switzerland, i told you that the united states shares your vision of how to end this war. the end of this war must be based on the will of the people ukraine under the un charter. we must work with the international community to ensure a lasting and durable peace. and at that conference. i told other leaders, no decision to end this war can be made without ukraine. yet, some people in my country want to force ukraine to give up a significant portion. answered. is there any indication that president biden intends to allow ukraine to strike deep into russian territory? look, our policy has not changed. we we will continue to support ukraine as long as they continue their fight against aggression from mr. putin. this is our commitment, this is what the president is focused on, i have nothing more to add. that's all. no, they are not going to give permission to strike at russian territory now, despite the position of some of their own. trump, then this means that she hasn't rea

and it has also urge along for wealth to move to united states. but now with the interest rate cutting, united states, uh, you know, depth of, you know, a business as it is they did benefit from the building you create. so it's tons for peace and credit. donald trump has hosted documents the landscape, the talks in new york, this fund earlier timing. he had no time to do so. what do you make of that you to the by donald trump coming well, the republican presidential nominee continues to insist he would ends the world within 24 hours after being elected in november. if that should happen. but uh he thought some, uh, has a actually has a very good record of, uh, you know, uh, not initiating any wars doing his uh, tendency. mm. as the president of the united states, i think i think he has a very strong willed to follow the same policy if he wins this election. i speaking to the us media earlier of resumes, the landscape claims that quotes we are closer to pace than we think. do you really believe that's the case? i know you said the time is 530. coul