we are about containing russia. and if we don't start off the truck, the administration started off, not only by preventing a nuclear war by ceasing this attack on russia, but by openly say that we no longer are seeking the strategic defeat of russia. because that's the, that's the, that there is a requirement for going forward. if we continue to pursue a policy that speak 6, the strategic defeat of russia, russian will never sit down at the table with us. why sit down and talk to an enemy who's trying to defeat you? what you need to do therefore is defeat the enemy, which is what russian was doing on the battlefield. a new, great. yeah, i david the way the it's being reported. yeah. you know, mean what's coming out of the, by the ministration, which of course is trying to make the situation as worse as possible. that is a new and remarkable achievement of this outgoing failed administration. but essentially what they're doing is they're saying what's have min minutes 3. i mean it's, you know, almost no one knows th

some of the important assets in russia. i don't know how much we could have had, but i think it would have made difference at the beginning. but of course, we are where we are now. so move on now to the first, if you like, invasion of ukraine by in the 20th century, 21st century by russia in 2014. so in 2014, putin annexed crimea and then russia begins to support what were called separatists, but were really russian proxies in the eastern part of ukraine and. the obama administration has to respond to that. so i wonder if you could talk about the kinds of sanctions that were imposed then what explains what now appears to be the rather weak obama to this? first, russian incursion into ukraine right. i think it was a really interesting period to explore the economic response to russia's annexation of crimea and the the invasion into the donbass. they were caught very unaware and unprepared and i would say they weren't. there wasn't a deep bench. i would say, in terms of russian expertise. they weren't expecting it. so when it

it's difficult for russia to _ syria? it's difficult for russia to sugar-coatl syria?t is russia to sugar—coat what is happening. effectively this is a blow to russia and russia are's prestige when you consider the resources, the huge amount of resources that russia poured in to trying to make sure that bashar al—assad stayed in power over the last nine years, their financial resources, political resources and of course military resources. russia are intervening in the syrian war intervening in the syrian war in 2015 to shore up assad, that sending thousands of troops and russian air power. keep in mind this intervention by russia was driven by russia's desire to project itself as a global power and to establish itself as the key power in the middle east, a power that could speak to all sides. and what have we seenin to all sides. and what have we seen in recent days? we have seen in recent days? we have seen this project, syria, unravelling for the kremlin in quite dramatic circumstances. so it is a blow and that's reflected by some of their headlines in today's russi

um, in russia, the russia—ukraine war.s a step that i think should have been taken sooner. uh, and it allows ukraine to better defend itself. i don't think, as secretary austin has said, the current secretary of defence, i don't think it's a so—called game changer that's going to turn the tide in the war for for ukraine. but it's certainly a step in the right direction. is there anything else that president biden can do between now and inauguration day to help ukraine? uh, well, as i understand it, they are continuing to push out equipment and other resources that have been authorised by congress. of course, the new administration, uh, can, you know, can countermand any orders that haven't, haven't been fulfilled. i think we should be focussed on convincing the trump administration that the best policy for the united states, for us— national security, is to oppose russian aggression. uh, we talk about support for ukraine, and i understand it. and i am as big a supporter of ukraine as you're going to find. but in phrasing w

we are about containing russia. and if we don't start off the truck, the administration started off, not only by preventing a nuclear war by seeing this attack on russia, but by openly say that we no longer are seeking the strategic defeat of russia. because that's the, that's the, that there is a requirement for going forward. if we continue to pursue a policy that speak 6, the strategic defeat of russia, russia will never sit down at the table with us. why sit down and talk to an enemy who's trying to defeat you? what you need to do, therefore it does defeat the enemy, which is what russian was doing on the battlefield. a new great. yeah, david, the way the it's being reported. yeah. you know, mean what's coming out of the, by the ministration, which of course is trying to make the situation as worse as possible. that is a new and remarkable achievement of this outgoing failed administration. but essentially what they're doing is they're saying what's have min minutes 3. i mean it's, you know, almost no one knows

russia has been a catalyst.ooking forward some of the key question will be how do we get challenge and what role should russia play? one of the important dynamics is the risk that comes as a result of russia's willingness the more russia campaigns more the same so it will only rise. and it will shape and influence the nature of tomorrow. >> russia had been successful assassinating lackluster response to the u.s. difference photos of the feast is roughly ten days the arsons they are killed. they come article four and there is lackluster slots. as you said, this will be a key challenge moving forward. there's a lot more to think about in terms of how we respond. the axis of the way, they can this. and in the return. in the russia china relations 2022 look forward to understand that could evolve. it is what we could imagine russia would be willing to do given the nature of technology. we have to think both as a icebreaker and paving the past. in ways that is increasing military capabilities and adversaries and the

an extra stipulation for russia. that's a critical words, words matter when you're dealing with russians and russian policy. this is an extra central issue in russia is committed the national survival of russia to this conflict. and they are not going to deal. they are not going to throw it away. anything less than a cheating. the outcome is that they have articulated, which is no nato membership, demilitarization of ukraine, the notification of your grade. anything less than that is a strategic defeat for russia. therefore, unacceptable to russia, in the less needs to understand that, that in pushing russia to this good, remember this conflict didn't begin in february 22. this conflict began well prior to 2014, but it, it took its current form in 2014, and russia has been seeking to avoid this conflict that entire time. what do you think middle one was? what do you think vince 2 was? what do you think the rushing the effort to of to insert draft treaties in december of 2021 while you go? what do you think the 1st ne

what would be acceptable to russia? maybe if you had as many nuclear weapons, what would be acceptable with china, will it have as many nuclear weapons. but that wouldn't be acceptable to us. once you start the three-way arms race, i don't see an easy way out of this. so for all of these reasons, my advice to the new administration is just don't do it. it is literally, there are so many things in nuclear policy where factors are way behind our control but when it comes to choosing an arms race that we can decide not to take part in and choose not to do an arms race. earlier in this administration, secretary of defense said nuclear deterrence is not a numbers' game. i wish d.o.d. listened to their leader because he is 100% right and my advice is just don't start an arms race, it's not worth it. if we maintain a safe, secure and reliable deterrent, we don't need to build more. >> thank you james, madeleine and adam. we just have a couple of questions from the audience and i encourage you those who have a thought, please p

um, in russia, the russia—ukraine war.h, it was a step that i think should have been taken sooner. uh, and it allows ukraine to better defend itself. i don't think, as secretary austin has said, the current secretary of defence, i don't think it's a so—called game changer that's going to turn the tide in the war for for ukraine. but it's certainly a step in the right direction. is there anything else that president biden can do between now and inauguration day to help ukraine? uh, well, as i understand it, they are continuing to push out equipment and other resources that have been authorised by congress. of course, the new administration, uh, can, you know, can countermand any orders that haven't, haven't been fulfilled. i think we should be focussed on convincing the trump administration that the best policy for the united states, for us— national security, is to oppose russian aggression. uh, we talk about support for ukraine, and i understand it. and i am as big a supporter of ukraine as you're going to find. but in ph

what you think russia would do with him? it is unclear at _ russia would do with him?don't know. they... also, i don't know. they... also, i don't think a certain he can't go back to syria unless he is going to go back to prison. that should be something that the discussion about assad should take place in the future but i think the bottom line is they still offered him asylum. they still offered him protection. the assad family controlled syria with an iron fist, for 53 years. president bashar al—assad took power in 2000, after his father had been in control since the 1970s. jeremy bowen, has more on the family dynasty, that was once all powerful, and ruthless against its enemeies. hayat tahrir al—sham inherited the regime when his father died in 2000. 30 blood the regime when his father died in 2000.30 blood since the regime when his father died in 2000. 30 blood since seizing power, he jailed anyone who threatened his will. after he buried him, syrians hoped bashar al—assad, trained as a doctor in london, would reform and modernise the country. so did tony blair, an

an extra stipulation for russia. that's a critical words, words matter when you're dealing with russians and russian policy. this is an extra central issue in russia is committed the national survival of russia to this conflict. and they are not going to deal. they are not going to throw it away. anything less than a cheating, the outcomes that they have articulated, which is no nato membership, demilitarization of ukraine, the notification of your train, anything less than that is a strategic defeat for russia. therefore, unacceptable to russia, in the less needs to understand that, that in pushing russia to this good, remember this conflict didn't begin in february 22. this conflict began well prior to 2014, but it, it did to get the card form in 2014, and russia is been seeking to avoid this conflict that entire time. what do you think permits one was? what do you think mintz 2 was, what do you think the rushing the effort to of to insert draft treaties. december of 2021. when you go, what do you think the 1st neg

when you refer to russia, you don't refer it as russia but putin. are there any places within russia where putin could now be influenced? sanctioning of oligarchs hasn't worked, democratic enforcements have not worked. the elites of st. petersburg and moscow keeping their children out of military haven't worked. how could putin be influenced within russia, if at all? liana: we have a few more minutes for this question. mr. poroshenko: this is a very important question. personal, sectoral, all means that the civilized world has in their hands. by the way, if it is the war for ukraine or if it is the war including china. i have only one answer. what is the criteria of the function? not the number of pages we have on the table the ambassador has played a great role. take one criteria. this criteria is volume of russian exports. if russian experts -- exports in 2022 was how much? $600 billion. with the enormous high price. what is the purpose? we need to have the volume of russian exports below $200 billion. otherwise he will have a real problem inside

. . . ., ., in russia.a. yaroslav trofimov, thank you for _ in russia. yaroslav trofimov, thank you for being _ in russia. yaroslav trofimov, thank you for being with - in russia. yaroslav trofimov, thank you for being with us. | peter dickinson, editor of ukrainealert at the atlantic council. thank you for being on the programme tonight. clearly the motivation here is obvious, they are trying to demoralise those on whom the war directly depends, and you would think it is creating some paranoia within the general command. absolutely, the idea here is to send a very clear message to everyone in the hierarchy of russia, the political hierarchy or military hierarchy, that you are not safe, these attacks took place fairly centrally in the heart of moscow about a very senior member of the military so it does not get much higher than that. so they r clearly indicates into the russians that they will be held to account. ukraine is not going to wait for some long—winded international tribunals, they are going to ex

we cannot defeat russia. not just russia. you want ukraine alone to defeat russia, north korea and china? the whole western nations together. this is why i believe in ukrainian victory. let's choose victory and not talk. i will tell my daughter the west is credible. thank you. [applause] >> i do not envy you to speak so passionately. [laughter] you are here representing the most important member of nato. the biggest supporter of ukraine military efforts. what would you say about the definition of victory? the role your country can play in this war? >> thank you for the opportunity to visit with all of our allies. i appreciate the comments that have been made already. the concerns all of you have expressed. let me back up a little bit. i served as governor of south dakota for eight years. there was not a year that went by in which during that time we were not at war. i went to 31 funerals. i remember those funerals and i remember the hurt that everyone of those families had. you cannot take away the hurt. you can let them know

of russia disclose it this _ interests of russia disclose it this is— interests of russia disclose itiolation of sanctions, that is fairly obvious, and _ violation of sanctions, that is fairly obvious, and it- violation of sanctions, that is fairly obvious, and it is- fairly obvious, and it is important _ fairly obvious, and it is important to— fairly obvious, and it is important to say- fairly obvious, and it is important to say that i fairly obvious, and it is- important to say that even though— important to say that even though it _ important to say that even though it is _ important to say that even though it is obvious. - important to say that even though it is obvious. we . important to say that even though it is obvious. we have not to though it is obvious. we have got to leave _ though it is obvious. we have got to leave it _ though it is obvious. we have got to leave it there - though it is obvious. we have got to leave it there but - got to leave it there but thanks for being with me for the last 15 minutes to give me your expert analysis of what we are seeing playing out. t

uh, how much can russia invest? the answer is, well, it certainly has some resources to invest into syria. in other words, russia is resource constrained because of its war in ukraine. but it is not yet desperate. and the serial operation from the very beginning by the crime one's own design, was always limited. it was meant to be limited up. so in theory, the kremlin has some assets, air assets, it can give to a saw. the question is, how long is this going to go? what would be the logistics involved? that there's so many listen me, unforeseen potential consequences. and, and so the, the answer, the short answer is yes. they have something to give. but how, how, how, how, how much will it matter and that, that remains to be seen. certainly, i would say pollutants credibility here is on the line right now. all right, and does the fact that the militants were able to capture a level so quickly that the serious 2nd biggest city does not show that moscow really is unable to help aside? well, it certainly is a set back i

we are about containing russia. and if we don't start off the truck, the administration started off, not only by preventing a nuclear war by ceasing this attack on russia, but by openly saying that we no longer are seeking the strategic defeat of russia. because that's the, that's the, that there is a requirement for going forward. if we continue to pursue a policy that speak 6, the strategic defeat of russia, russian will never sit down at the table with us. why sit down and talk to an enemy, who's trying to defend you? what you need to do, therefore, it is defeat the enemy, which is what russian is doing on the battlefield. a new, great, david, the way the it's being reported that, you know, mean what's coming out of the, by the ministration. which of course is trying to make the situation as worse as possible. and that is a new and remarkable achievement of this outgoing failed administration. but essentially what they're doing is they're saying what's have min minutes 3. i mean it's, you know, almost no one know

the russia is a game with junky, and prussia provokes poland into breaking ties with russia. but it's a perilous union under which poland must give up condensed control to prussia. prussia now poses a threat to russia. some further petition to poland becomes inevitable. look forward to talking to you all that technology should work for people. a robot must obey the orders given by human beings accept. we're such orders at conflict with the 1st law show your mind, anticipation. we should be very careful about our personal intelligence. the point obviously is to makes a trust rather than to the various. i mean with artificial intelligence we have summoning the theme and the robot most protects his phone existence was on the 1793. russia around prussia sign a convention that's been approved by the polar st. russia it receives historical orthodox lands. the eastern box of police. yeah. but go yeah. the brochure takes lands inhabited by goals. good. i'm going to poland. co you of you and most of the, the, although most of the great opponent lands go to prussia, the poles and orang

how do you remain dependent on russia? i'm not saying you want to be, but you are dependent on it at the same time of trying laws. i mean i, i just even don't know how you would manage that g o politically and from an economic perspective. how is that going and are, you know, how are you making progress in cutting off that dependency? so the current government made a clear decision right off the full scale invasion of who quite and as we look good with all the defendants in russian hodges. and i guess we'll solve, we have some capacity terminals in germany and lands. we can get the g and we will get rid of the russian oil next year. so there is no contradiction. you don't want to be dependent on someone who wants to have luxury. you at the same time, do you fear it will a kind strategic contraction of us commitments around the world that one of the things i think president trump represents is a frustration of a lot of americans. that somehow they play a security guarantor in the world. but china has come out, ending up a w

had brought it here in russia. you can say what you think were out loud and it was the most relieving thing in the world. you actually are like me. this is actually really enjoyable. you can make jokes about this sort of stuff. nobody would you know, cancel you or try to dock too or anything like that. talk about it. it was by whatever you're moving on. what about health care you? are you all worried about getting like the kids to the doctor or because oh okay, well i told them, i mean this goes at the end of last year and i had to go get a surgery. i was just like, oh, great, awesome. so like this is over for us because i'm going to drop, you know, tens of thousands of dollars on this, which i would have definitely in the states. i have like one of the best orthopedic surgeons. like 5 star level hospital room, 1300 bucks. yeah. my says pregnancy ended up being on the case day and i think the bill was a $100000.00. we got a big discount on it because it was self pay. it was like $80000.00. and then we had the medic

what does it tell us if you is in russia?— does it tell us if you is in russia? . ~ , ., , russia?d and his whereabouts, it _ russia? regarding assad and his whereabouts, it is _ russia? regarding assad and his whereabouts, it is still— russia? regarding assad and his whereabouts, it is still very - whereabouts, it is still very unclear, but russia make sense. the options were very limited for him. iran could have given him some protection, russia could have given protection, but in many ways it makes more sense for iran to see him go to russia rather than turn around, because iran inevitably will want some influence in this region afterwards, and it is not a good look for iran to be giving asylum to a deeply deeply unpopular president who has bombed, tortured and murdered his own civilians for the past 14 years. so, my initial sense is that russia makes some sense, but frankly, assad does not have many options left.— assad does not have many options left. tell us what you know about _ options left. tell us what you know about hts _ options left. tell us what you know about hts and

the transition to capitalism in russia. and all of these companies flooding out of russia as a result of this dramatic and unprecedented invasion of a sovereign country, that this would change things for the foreseeable future. i did not see this ending anytime soon. i had people wondering what would happen when the war ended? i also thought this was an interesting example to look at because we have never imposed sanctions on and -- on an economy as large as russia. the u.s., europe, u.k., japan, and australia represent something like half of the gdp. i thought it was an interesting experiment to examine would it work and how well would it work and if this is a different challenge, then sanctioning north korea or iran, because as you mention, russia is so much more integrated in the global economy. and it would be much harder to impose these sanctions on russia. and i wanted to explore what would be the limits and how it would work particularly because russia as a nuclear power invading a sovereign neighbor, the response re

it appears that people in russia also desire peace. now this could be a simple decision with no one losing anything. could it be possible just to stop where we currently are? so to advise you in new york, this is a sincere attempt to find a solution. you know, of you. this attempt is balanced and not imposing on either side. that is why it is being put forward by neutral countries that do not interfere in the conflict. like western countries do, who are actually at war with us using ukrainians as proxies. they are actually a belligerent party. is it possible to stop the hostilities right now? there is a depletion of combat equipment, munitions, and most importantly, personnel on the part of the ukranian armed forces. army is moving forward. to stop for a week means to give the enemy the chance to gain a foothold on their positions, to take a break and get the necessary equipment and i, munitions, letting people in ukraine i snatched from the streets like stray dogs. as i already said at the ministry of defense, they are snatched like s

oh russia. he is definitely part of the leadership of the defense ministry minister leadership of the general style. and she became quite famous or rather infamous. if you look from the graham, uh, you know, through the training lens, food constantly, cuz usually you grain in his public briefings of using chemical weapons of endangering of the situation. for example, a new or nuclear power plant in the u cranium held a part of the russian course cobblers. so he was also a media of seger and his a liquidation by the granny is of course, an old dextrous act in near what seems to be like an apartment love where he lived in the uh, north east of moscow. its not a very prestigious area, but still um, what the rest of the social media is now showing. i live top uh the photos from moscow. it seems that uh, the uh, this, this operation was carried out with the uh, in mind of booby trapped uh scrooge on which was parked near the entrance to the apartment. look, uh, we see this quite disturbing. i would s

and russia for the first time in 35 years. from the biden administration's perspective, your perspective, if you could lay out, given the landscape you talked about, what are the risks of failure going forward in the future to not have effective limits on the most dangerous weapons, we're looking at nuclear weapons in particular. jon: thanks for the questions and for doing this. look, the risks are obvious. for generations now, we've collectively put the risk of nuclear war at the very top of the list of things to avoid for people managing global security, national security. the reality is the end of the administration is not the time to roll out or mousse about in a form -- muse about in a form like this a new approach or thoughts on the numerical aspects of our policy. i suspect we'll see an early statement along those lines in the early administration and the way you got a posture from our administration early on in the biden years. and the reality is, i think we've been quite clear that we don't just see this issue as a pu

it's military, industrial base of the west as russia has. of course i reciprocated by sending fiber jets. it was way, i think it was quest in missile defense and space technology. meanwhile, north korea is set to be saved, rank fuel and funding from russia to boost its manufacturing and military prowess about china. they're receiving a russian expertise with both nations team and got to run pop, military tech cooperation. i saw this seems to be drawing americas i or i just last week. he watched national security advisor, jake solve, and voiced his jitters over this burgeoning conversions among these 4 nations. how do you answer critics to say this alliance of bad guys? it has actually gotten tighter and, you know, and in a way um, more solidified under the semester a lot. look, i think there is no doubt that there is increasing alignment among these 4 actors. and why has this happened? it is not happened because these countries are so strong, it has happened out of necessity because these countries are under pressure. rush under pressure, an

you can, well russia's doing there. we can give the intelligence to the opinions and that the location of russian troops we can tag at that missiles begins to fade away. just nothings of, you know, nothing about what the speed was. that was the most remarkable reactions i think has been from ag search here. sorry, i'm are the british prime minister who has basically said, look, you probably can do anything it wants once we stand. but you find this seems to be some sort of license that you know, you pray and kind of commit acts of terrorism. we've seen it before. and the last 2 years, i personally cover the killings of london capacity and st. petersburg are you do going to own armed individuals not even confidence murdered, and there's no condemnation. so in the light and the opposite combination, what is it or the ag condoning this? that's what has the take care style are quite remarkably saying, you know, they can basically do whatever they liked and some of this, do you comfortable with the assassination? well, as i s

what will russia do if the evidence is overwhelming that this was an act committed by russia that wascompetent or reckless and that is how this aircraft was brought down? would they have been at fault? no one is saying this is delivered. it's highly unlikely this would be a deliberate act. but there are other possibilities that would still make russia very uncomfortable, and the normal thing that russia does is they go into denial mode. but i think the evidence is likely to mount that this was not a simple accident, that there was electronic interference, and that the damage seems to have been caused by some kind of missile and the larger conclusion that may well be that the only player who had the capacity to lodge missiles, whether it was short range or longer-range, would have been russia. sarah: that was aurel brown talking to me earlier, professor of international relations and political science at the university of toronto. the eu has threatened to impose further sanctions on russia after one of its cargo ships was blamed for severing an underwater cable. it carries electricity

they are trying to bring the war to russia.hy president zelenskyy order the invasion of the kursk region of russia. that is why ukraine is firing drones and missiles at military and infrastructure in russia. that is why there has been this growing number of the on russian soil as you mentioned. in addition to the general, one of the leaders of the russian cruise missile program but before that senior russian officers, intelligence officials. that is all part of a campaign to bring the war to russia so that the russians also feel the results of this three-year-old conflict that has been felt by every ukrainian. >> there is a certain flamboyance in a way to the methods that they are using. they are very public in the way they execute some of these assassinations. highly covert operations. it is much in the style of the israeli intelligence services. >> yes and no. if you look at the casualties from the ukrainian attacks, it is very rare we actually have civilians, innocent bystanders being hit. the assassination today of the gene

like uh, what, what made you decide to come to russia? i received asylum, and so far as i know, the next man after his note to get it. and that's american, us embassies and 4 countries that come after me is wild. and so we have a couple of theories, the one that most people come to me 1st like, oh, there's just a bunch of bureaucratic mistakes, but there's no way they raised our house in 2002 in cyprus. they have a huge fall on my wife. they've interrogated me, they visited me and vote here in prison. personally, the i came, they tried to make deals. and also whenever, for microsoft, i covered the middle east and africa and i had several intelligence agency trying to recruit me to work for them. and when i kept saying no, they wanted to make an offer. i couldn't refuse it, never history that to and is approvable, know because when they try and recruiters not like they leave behind a business card to say, hey, you know, i'm from the intelligence agency, but very clearly there are 3 recruitment attempts. why is it that the f b i is looking

and that's the difference between the us and russia. whereas russia doesn't work that way. for russia, it is very important to work with everybody on an equal basis. how sincerely worried, are you about an escalation and conflict between russia in the united states, knowing what you do? the european say that the risk, but we spoke to each other that this is not for the landscape to dictate the terms of the do. it's for the us and the russia. oh, i don't think they should be presenting go relations as well. you know, to guys decide for everybody, not at all, it doesn't know that there's not those style. we prefer the mentors which don't. and they didn't briggs and shun psycho operation of innovation where the un shut the principle of solver and the quantity of states is really important. the us as not to use the, the respect southern and the quantity of states. the united states. you know, when they say we can look below russia to be a new cree because this will undermine our rules based world order. and the rules based with all these americans organization. now his point is

okay, so they've pummeled russia. russia is the most function of country in the world, and yet the economy is doing great. it's not just surviving. is thriving. a lot of people are saying you're just high enough is next. china is somewhere in the future, across has of america. is there any truth to that, nelson? and i don't really believe so because i think at the european leaders and, you know, some of the new columns in the, in, in the us are still trying to push the envelope and trying to, uh, you know, to scare people were away as they tried to cross the roger which now they realize it's. busy almost impossible. and then uh they started giving up the warning that the china, china will be the next. and was all the building up of patients in the south side of china. see across the taiwan strait. uh, they're trying to present the inmates that china is the party that is, you know, farming the regional stability but come all this is not true, but they're so the don't like, yeah, exactly. the reality is not like this. i think you're absolutely right nelson, but it's what about narrative, qui

so poland now plays a leading role in nature plans for a confrontation with russia. the dangerous role. usually the more humor. oh that's here. say boesky. it also talk you are going to shut that off. so sort of getting use of on the i think it on dial motion. i forget judge is a so i was trying to on his own to it as godsa. you go to shuffle, they move on his own joe on. yeah. don't save storm, i think is a big means in our streaming to america. yeah, i mean, he spoke to chase for, i mean, that close to me. i don't see scheme do. well, yeah, canadian. so you can use e program, like many polls general has done political analyst. and jamie, if netscape takes a motor with an pragmatic position between outright rows of folks and rushes, admirers, sports, that's not. so to watch, see of the node up here. yes to beth, no content to watch. you know that goes so bill of trash it little gate volume shut of a lot. take off bend. don't put a move on to induction. chung with the turbine. yeah. to demario public. not sure. what on the back up or down? she went out the stuff so i

my 1st time and it's probably the coldest day since i've arrived in russia. i am feeling it to my bones right now. the pills are due to a tough how you doing the role of the frozen as well? you can feel anything. oh no, you came. i think you brought this weather with you man. yeah, i'm not good either. so i don't know to go back and tell me a little bit about yourself, like, uh, what, what made you decide to come to russia? i received asylum, and so far as i know, the next man after snowden to get it. and that's american, us embassies and 4 countries that come after me is wild. and so we have a couple of theories, the one that most people come to as far as like, oh, there's just a bunch of bureaucratic mistakes, but there's no way they raised our house in 2002 in cyprus. they have a huge file on my wife. they've interrogated me, they visited me and bought here in prison. personally, the i came, they tried to make deals. and also whenever, from microsoft i cover the middle east and africa and i had several intelligence agency trying to recruit me to work for t