a criminal prosecution in power though to case brought by south africa at the international court of justice, accusing israel of genocide in gaza as the destruction escalates on the ground, mexico and she likes and of now with the both israel and thomas to the international criminal court site in consents about war crimes. while the, you and i, c, j come some traits on disputes between countries. the icpc is a criminal tribunal which can prosecute the individuals during hood soaks appearance in davos, he put forward his rails position on the war in gaza while rejecting the challenges of genocide twisting. and i'm not shy away from the human tragedy in gaza. and you want to know something we care, we care the boys, if it is paint for us. that's all neighbors. i was suffering so much. but how else can we defend ourselves in an infrastructure of the old unbelievable size? and i call upon the entire international community to stand with is running or reject this plane. in many countries around the world have expressed concerns about the disproportionality of israel's war on godsa and the human c

of the court. and this is essentially the problem of the international court of justice in that it can take on a relativelyolitical slant in the decisions which it issues. amy: their terms are up. the american, she has had a number of positions at the state department before, joan donoghue. up in february. so they could be up before this decision is released. is that right? >> i am not aware of when her term is up so i can't really comment on that. the fact she is sitting on the issue of provisional measures means she will have some impact on what happens as the court makes findings on provisional measures. if the court decides to go into the merits of the case and proceeds with the matter, then she will no longer sit on the case going forward -- but we don't know who will replace her. that is an unknown. but it is not guaranteed there won't be u.s. influence on the case going forward. nermeen: as we wrap up, if you can give us your final thoughts, your assessment of what the situation is right now in gaza, what you hope will come out of this. >> as i mentioned, i hope following the hearing sessions and on

court is there to announce punishment or mayor to stop this genocide, but of course the court has no force implement their decision or their orders, just like any other court, international court of justicehe judges, including from various part of the world, they are judges from the europe, there are judges from the africa, from the middle east, from latin america, i mean it is very, very important and high level court, and it it is very important, the decision of this court has a international importance, it is the backing of the international community, of course the court itself has implementation force, but definitely the international community will exert lot of pressure and i believe that the israel has to bow down and israel has to respect the international court of justice, i mean israel cannot rebellion to united nation, cannot be rebellion to international court of justice and all the... international community, it cannot be rebellion to everybody, american might to try to protect them and but still i believe the international court of justice will do something and it will make some difference in the coming days. thanks lot sir, foreign pakistani diplomats, zamir ahmad joining

you have to remember that the 1st, the decision by the international court of justice on the binding nature of british little measures was directed against the united states because they refused to themselves respect for visual measures of the court. in, in a case of more than 20 years ago. all right. i'm afraid that we have run out of time, but i want to thank all of our guests for this inciteful discussion. that is laura albano and powers william shave is in toronto and jennifer cassidy. and dublin and thank you to for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website out a 0 dot com. as a further discussion do, go to our facebook page. that's facebook dot com, forward slash age and side story. you can also join the conversation on x a handle as at age and 5 story from me, elizabeth, put on an indian tie a team here. and uh huh. bye. for now the, the car has been going off of the sauce the full day. it's a 120 kilometers in many areas. how does the news continues to define their basic needs to this year? most of them are some of the rumbling that have been doi

a day after hearing south africa's request for urgent action by the international court of justice for the immediate stop of the military actions of the zionist regime in gaza , the hearing of the positions of the zionist regime was also held at the court in the hague. in dozens of pages of files, citing the words of zionist leaders and documents related to the targeted killing of civilians in gaza, south africa has filed a complaint against the genocide of the zionist regime to the court, a historical court, the location of the peace palace in laha, the subject of the meeting of the international court of justice for handling south africa's complaint against the occupying regime accused of genocide in gaza. but the importance of the issue that makes supporters of palestine to speak like this. south african lawyer react the zionist regime, which always saw itself above the international law, is now in alit. the world court is sitting in the place of the accused. that is the accusation of the biggest crime against humanity. genocide . 75 years after he declared himself a victim of genoc

you have to remember that the 1st, the decision by the international court of justice on the binding nature of british little measures was directed against the united states. because they refused to themselves respect for visual measures of the court in, in a case of more than 20 years ago. all right. i'm afraid that we have run out of time, but i want to thank all of our guests for this inciteful discussion. that is laura albano and powers william shave is in toronto, and jennifer cassidy and dublin. and thank you to for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website, which is 0 dot com. as a further discussion do go to our facebook page, that's facebook dot com, forward slash age and side story. you can also join the conversation on x a handle as at age and 5 story from me, elizabeth, put on an indian tie a team here and uh huh. bye for now, the what constitutes exempt. so we can talk to a see, i want you to start with just the facts, right? as to what happened as independent. we want these, we want the education i want to, we don't have to lead them in dif

of the hague international court against the zionist regime. this ruling is a decisive victory for the rule of law and an important milestone in establishing justice for the palestinian people. the south african government, meanwhile, continues to implement the interim measures of the court without stopping. he considered the war in gaza impossible and emphasized that we expected the hague court of justice to issue a ruling to stop the war in gaza. the hague court of justice this evening in his ruling , he voted for a series of temporary measures regarding the case of the accusation of genocide by the zionist regime in the gaza war. in this ruling, the zionist regime is required to take all measures to prevent any act that can be considered genocide. also, the zionist regime must take measures to guarantee humanitarian access. the hague international court of justice confirmed the jurisdiction of the criminal court to deal with the genocide case against the zionist regime. the lebanese resistance targeted the positions of the zionist soldiers in the occupied fields of sheba with eight missiles. hezbollah announced the location the gathering of zio

the international court of justice has ordered his route to stop. it's a sold on rafa. the order is one of 3 issued by the us top court in the genocide case, brought by south africa against israel, over its war on guys. israel has long declared it plans to intensify, sold on the southern city, saying it's necessary to dismantle from us. and it appears advance to follow through with that strategy. the i, c, j is readings final and legally binding, but it doesn't have a way to enforce them. so, does this latest sort of carry any weight? and will it affect events on the ground? and how will prime it is finished now manage increased pressure at home and abroad . we'll explore these questions what i guess in just a moment. but for us this report by continental past already on the it's a significant move for the us top court. a landmark emergency of ruling ordering. israel to stop it's assault on rafa, is it must immediately hold me to open and any other accident and did also have governors which made conflict on the but assuming a group and gaza conditions of life. that could

the hague international court of justice gave jurisdiction. criminal proceedings he also approved the genocide case against the zionist regime. the islamic resistance movement hamas considered the verdict of the international court of justice as an important development. sami abu zohri, one of the political officials of hamas, said: this sentence helps to isolate the zionist regime and expose its crimes in gaza. sami abu zohar. he also demanded to oblige the occupiers to implement the decisions of the hague tribunal. the minister of foreign affairs of the palestinian authority welcomed the interim measures of the hague international court of justice and said: the judges of this court voted in favor of humanity and international law . in front of the prime minister of the zionist regime cabinet ministers have asked not to comment on the decision of the international court of justice. do at the same time, netanyahu said: the court's willingness to discuss genocide claims against israel is a disgrace that will not be erased from generation to gene

the decisions of the hague court , the minister of foreign affairs of the palestinian authority welcomed the interim measures of the hague international court of justice and said: the judges of this court voted in favor of humanity and international law. on the other hand , the prime minister of the zionist regime has asked his cabinet ministers not to comment on the decision of the international court of justice. meanwhile, netanyahu said that the court's desire to discuss the claims of genocide against israel is not a disgrace, as it is a pure bloodline. will not the minister of national security of the zionist regime also accused the international court of justice of anti-semitism and claimed that its decision proves that it does not seek justice. palestine information center of martyrdom. a hungry baby in the gaza strip reported. this baby, who was less than 6 months old , was martyred in the north of the gaza strip. the area where the zionist regime continues to prevent humanitarian aid from entering on the 111th day of attacks. the palestinian ministry of health has announced that about 600,000 palestinian citizens in northern gaza are at risk o

of the court. the international court of justice said in the courtroom that the investigation or fact -finding committee needs access to the documents about the accusation of genocide in gaza . that the subject of the court be determined. israel must submit a report to the court about this decision within one month, and this decision was actually made by different judges based on the opinion of 13 judges and two votes, actually two judges disagreed . two judges dissented. according to the boss the international court of justice, the living conditions of the residents of the gaza strip have significantly worsened and the situation has improved after weeks of disasters. in order to further examine the judgment of the court today, i will speak with mr. mohammad hadi zakir hossein, professor of international criminal law at the university of tehran, mr. dr. basically what was south africa's complaint? what did he demand? in the name of allah, the most merciful, the most merciful, at your service and to all the dear viewers, i say hello and good night. i also offer my condolences on the loss of the late pres

uh, the international court of justice is in the hague. you can name of the i, c, c, w, h o, well as the clinic for all these institutions that are supposed to serve on a few many t, e, quick. on the other side in the west. the high end is why they terminated by western europe and north america. yeah, just to get started jumping, i get what you're saying. i mean, you're right. i mean, you're either you and has become politicized. i mean, it's quite possible the i c, j and i c. c of the hague, of being politicized as well. i mean that we're just going to have to see how this all plays out. and just quickly, while we're all talking right now, we've been shopping a live pictures from just outside the hey, it's about a 1227 p. m. right? that right now we're showing a demonstrate is all that we built, palestinian flags being floating outside the hague. these are live pictures right now as we continue our discussion with our panel here and i'll let you international same quarterly i'd like to finally come to you if i may. if indeed the cool is to

the international court of justice, the u.n.'highest court come has been a plausible risk israel is committing genocide in gaza and ordered provisional measures but stopped short of calling for an immediate ceasefire. this is the president of the court joan donoghue reading out the vote -- part of the ruling. >> by 15 votes to two, the state of israel shall in accordance with its obligations on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in relation to the palestinians in gaza, take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of article two of the convention, in particular, a, killing members as a group, b, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, c, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life cap related to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, and d, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group. amy: over a one-hour ruling, the international court of justice president joan donoghue in the hague quoted israe

. this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact the international court of justiceappened. if this court had taken responsibility for this matter, it would not have been possible to transfer it to the international court of justice, because there's conflict over this issue. in fact, it's referral to the international court weakens the local court, but the existence of this dispute within the entity between the local court of justice and the administration created a situation that there was no choice but to transfer the case to the international court of justice where there is no escape. let us move from the international court of justice in the hague to us secretary of state, anthony blinken's recent visit to the occupying regime of israel, which revealed the existence of different לכם לישראלים יש שאיפות, גם לפלסטינים יש שאיפות ואתם צריכים לקבל את זה, על כך משיב לו בתוך החדר בפני השרים וראש הממשלה, השר רון דרמר, 85% מהפלסטינים ביהודה ושומרון. בטווח שבוצע בשבת השחורה, או במילים אחרות טודי דרמר אומר לבלינקן, אלו הפרטנרים שלנו, להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך

today the international court of justice has vindicated us. the court has concluded that passwords to articulate 9 of the convention. it has jurisdiction to educate our application, to the effects of the order that the i c j has grunted today. is that there is a possible case of genocide. this marks an important 1st in our quest to secure a justice for the people of guys. some have told us that we should mind our own business and not to get involved in the office of other countries. others have said it was not our place and yet it is very much our place. as the people who know too well the pain of disposition discrimination states one said violence. we are also a people who are the victims of the crime of our pottage. we know what a potted looks like we experienced and lived through it said the many people. busy who died and were anxiety like our beloved leader, only about tumble and many of us. oh, that's what i do. like the father of 5 democracy, nelson mandela, and many others. that for us, was the face of our party. we saw the africans whet

we have to wait for it according to article 41 and article 73 and 72 of the rules of procedure and justice of the court of justice to come to the court and issue a judgment and a temporary order and ask israel to temporarily it should not be destroyed, and since the situation is a genocidal situation , let him issue an order, issue a temporary order that a ceasefire should be declared for the time being, and he should stop his actions so that, god willing, he can issue his judgment or decision in the future, and unfortunately, if let's talk about the guarantee of execution. in the case of jajment and aram, we can have another strong guarantee of execution. at the moment , it is a government that is doing a generational push . obviously, i will also tell you that the representative of israel has come to announce. we are fighting against hamas, not against the people of gaza in domestic law, we have a spiritual element of crime, that is , the person who is committing the crime psychologically or willfully wants it to be done, but in international law, we do not have a spiritual element at all , that is,

this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact the international court of justiceppened. if this court had taken responsibility for this matter, it would not have been possible to transfer it to the international court of justice, because there's conflict over this issue. in fact, it's referral to the international court. weakens the local court, but the existence of this dispute within the entity between the local court of justice and the administration created a situation that there was no choice but to transfer the case to the international court of justice where there is no escape, let us move from the international court of justice in the hague to us secretary of state anthony blincan's recent visit to the occupying regime of israel which revealed the existence of differences לישראלים יש שאיפות, גם לפלסטינים יש שאיפות ואתם צריכים לקבל את זה. על כך משיב לו בתוך החדר בפני השרים וראש הממשלה השר רון דרמר. 85% מהפלסטינים ביהודה ושומרון תומכים. טווח שבוצע בשבת השחורה, או במילים אחרות טודי דרמר אומר לבלינקן, אלו הפרטנרים שלנו, להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך

and he had argued the case before the international court of justice on the wall. that is where i was building, get the west bank of the if your actual court justice ultimately ruled the world. why are laid into national lot. so gun mart called the victory for one low. he was also on the panel this morning. and then the other jurors were very eloquent, and they were, even though they used very measured words, and they made a point they study to the euros images, which might be extremely evocative. but i'm not so sorry. and their point of view, because reg strolled the words themselves juxtaposed with the letter of the law, put together the words and the letter, the little red dot would carry the day. everybody could persuade life, okay. and is that something you think that will be replicated when the, when hiring barrak, this is the former is ready. supreme court judge will be who david saying is randy's defense when he addresses the court tomorrow. do you think they're going to take the same tackle or how will that approach it? and i think there's a certain confusi

the south africa is asking the international court of justice to urgently hold what it says. our genocidal acts kind of dodge binds really forces in gaza. the country wants for you and the top court to issue the so called provisional measure is to order israel to end it's war. michael awful begins coverage. south africa tells the international court of justice please be seated. the world is witnessing a textbook case of genocide on fold in gaza. this killing is nothing short of destruction of palestinian life. it is inflicted deliberately. no one is fed, not even newborn babies. peace comes, it is thought to legal proceedings against israel in the union's highest legal body looking to show a patent of large scale, homicidal destruction that qualifies as acts of genocide for the past. 96 days is where it has subjected godsa to what has been described as one of the heaviest, conventional bombing campaigns in the history of modern will. fair. south africa is arguing israel's military campaign since from us as a tank one southern israel on october. the 7th has been nothing short o

criminal court is a is a western pool, the international criminal'. court of course is not the same as the international court of justice where the genocide cases being heard, individual cases should be built before the international criminal court, and that's simply a tool of nato, so i don't expect anything to happen there unless things radically change, but most countries um have domestic legislation, atlawing participation in geneside, certainly both the uk and the us to, and following determination. by the icj, i think we may find politicians held individually liable. i i think that's one of the things that might be might be a game changer here, but sadly that's not going to kick in very quickly. well, crek, let me just stay with you, because you you talked about the courts and the possibility of what can happen, and of course that it's un supported or nato, the other court, so is this the the what we're looking at basically um, the... collapse of the international um rules-based order in general as more and more people realize that so much of the jargon, the slogans was basically a farse, the protection of human r

israel's bombardment of gaza now exceeds 22,000, south africa has filed a case at the international court of justice in the hague accusing israel of genocide. we will speak with international human rights lawyer francis boyle. >> i believe also south africa will win any order from the world court against israel to cease and desist from committing all acts of genocide against the palestinians. amy: then as we enter 2024, a pivotal election year, with a look at how the powerful lobby group aipac, the american israel public affairs committee, is set to spend more than $100 million against aggressive congressmembers critical of israeli human rights violations in palestine, including the only palestinian-american member of congress rashida tlaib. >> speaking up to save lives, no matter faith, ethnicity should not be controversy in this chamber. the cries of the palestinian and israeli children sound no different to me. what i don't understand is why the cries of palestinians sound different to you all. amy: this comes as polls show a majority of u.s. voters support a in gaza. we will speak with ryan grim

of the court. however, it may take several years to prove the crime of rape in the hague court. we welcome the temporary measures and measures imposed by the international court of justice against israel. this ruling is a decisive victory for the rule of law. we hoped that the court would issue a ruling to stop the war in gaza, because the orders of the international court of justice will not come to fruition without a stop to the war. for this reason at the same time, the prime minister of the zionist regime announced this vote on the continuation of the crime. its case is a sign of a scandal that will be a scandal for generations and the court's willingness to discuss it will not be erased. we are fighting an unjust war and we will continue it until we win. although the madman of the hague did not vote to stop the aggression against gaza, he implicitly acknowledged the danger of genocide in gaza by the regime's allies. military faces limits legalists predict that if the court decides that there is a real risk of genocide in gaza, then the continued support of israel will be too much for other countries. it will be more difficult. the issue that the lawyers present in

this regime is the only one which was subjected to genocide, and in fact the international court of justiceof justice, where there is no escape, let us move from the international court of justice in the hague to us secretary of state anthony blinken's recent visit to the occupying regime of israel which revealed the existence of כמו שלכם, לישראלים יש שאיפות, גם לפלסטינים יש שאיפות ואתם צריכים לקבל את זה, על כך משיב לו בתוך החדר בפני השרים וראש הממשלה השר רון דרמר, 85% מהפלסטינים ביהודה ושומרון. תומכים בטווח שבוצע בשבת השחורה, או במילים אחרות טודי דרמר אומר לבלינקן, אלו הפרטנרים שלנו, להם לתת מדינה, זו העמדה שדרמר משמיע בתוך החדר. בחירים ישראלים אומרים לנו שהדברים של בלינקן, מהדברים שלא השתמע המסר, אם לא תציגו את פתרון שתי המדינות, אפילו כאיזשהו חזון רחוק, לא תשיגו שום דבר ברמה המדינית, בטח לא איזה שהיא התקדמות מול הסעודים. אמירה נוספת שעולה בתוך החדר של שר החוץ האמריקני בלינקן, הוא אומר שם אי אפשר לחסה לחלוטין את חמא. dr. walid muhammad ali, what is behind this extent of the dispute that emerged between blincan and the zianist officials, and what will be the consequences of this american s

the headlines the international court of justice is set to its first hearing in a case brought against israel for committing genocide in the sieged gaza strip. israel intensifies its air strikes and ground incursions in the gaza strip as a un agency issues a fresh warning about the humanitarian situation in ghaza. and yeman slams a un security council resolution on anti-israeli operations in the red sea saying all its actions fall within the framework of... legitimate defense, hello and welcome everybody, it's 11:30 am here in the iranian capital tehran, you're watching press tv's world news, our top story for this half hour, the international court of justice in the hague will hold its first hearing to consider its provisional measures a lawsuit filed by south africa. against israeli genocide in the gaza strip, both the plaintif and the defendant will face each other at the top un court today. judges will hear the case that accuses uh the tel aviv regime of genocide against palestinians and also requests an emergency suspension of israel's war on gaza. the icj will have two days of he

certainly the policies are apartite policies, the... is a long president of the international court of justice in the cases concerning navibia and south africa etc. and the states that are participating in these hearings this week, total of 53 states, stay with me, stay with me, i just want because we will get into some of this later on in the program, but overall i if had to ask you in your perspective, do you feel that this hearing is significant, very significant or not? i do think it is very significant because of the attention that it has garnered thus far and because of the considerable number of states that are participating in the hearings, of course it is moral uh, it will be moral ' advisory opinion without the possibility of enforcement, so if you're looking for enforcement uh, look to the contentious cases which are legally binding. okay, stay with me, stay with me, alfred, let me get kim in on this conversation. kim, this hearing comes a month after the one initiated by south africa regarding the zionist regime's committing's genocide in gaza. is this a sign that there is a change

well, on monday the international court of justice started public hearings about the israeli regime, which had been requested by the united nations general assembly in december of 2022. now, the court was asked to look into the legal consequences related to the regime's policies and practices in the occupied palestinian territories of the west bank gaza and east jerusalem. the question. the day is, will this hearing make a difference for palestinians in the occupied territories, or is it just more hoopl from the international community? what like to welcome my guests to the program, alfred zaias, former secretary of the un human rights council out of geneva, and kim sharif, activist and lawyer out of london. well, thank you both for being with me. i'd like to start this off in geneva with alfred, your perspective, how significant is this hearing on the israeli occupation? personally, i believe that every hearing before the international court of justice creates precedence, and it is important to show that there is opposition. worldwide opposition to the war that israel is waging on th

the international court of justice stated in january that there is a risk of the reputable prejudiced to the rights of the palestinians to be protected from genocide. i'd even domestic courts have, have started intervening benevolence, dutch court of appeal, for example, or did the suspension of um, sales to israel on the basis of a clear risk that they'd be used to commit violations of the law of armed conflict . and so that's quite a lot of clear evidence of serious risk the violations of international being committed in golf. and now why do you think it is nicaragua? whole countries finding this case? yeah, it's a very good question. nick roger is actually of a common litigation before the international court of justice that so, so it's a paid quite frequently before the court. many of those cases concerned its neighbors in, in central and south america. but some have concerned all the states, and in particular, 40 years ago, nicaragua brought a case against the united states. but the us is intervention and supportive of rebel groups within nicaragua itself. and that was alluded to

you had a rest of the case in the international court of justice against israel. a saying that it had breached the implications regarding the un can genocide convention. and it had also recommended the international court of justice to force israel go to over the israel to hall to oh, it's military campaign insight calls on this a step because it, it to be from the palestinian perspective as a whole rest as a completely historic event today, as they are hoping that the international court of justice will bring justice for counseling and this time to be israel, the accountability of its military acts inside the territory. and this is step palestinian c did not come within the day and lloyd to come off to load the plastic s it's and it's also as a result of the ongoing 17 meals located in over the gauze district which also completely restricted the access to food to water and medical supplies on south africa, clearly palestinian. you saw it see that it had also over viewed how much hot chips on suffering. how this thing is, what in, during, especially during 3 months

of the international rules based on the highest court. and that means by doing a is this called international court of justice. so if the court decides its still a big if to issue a professional measures, it could be a game changer in terms of what's been going on here at the united nations in new york. times thank you very much. indeed. diplomatic editor james bays at the united nations in new york or fighting is going to be the secondary proceedings of the international criminal court. as we've been discussing, israel is expected to defend itself against accusations of genocide made by side of africa. both countries are allowed to appoint one judge to the panel that's giving the case. israel's chosen, its former supreme court presidents, a home bach, 87 year old was born and miscellaneous, and he's a survivor of the holocaust. his parents moved to the british mandate of palestine in 1947 a year before the creation of the state of israel. monica showed support for israel's warning garza and these kind you see no evidence that israel's violated international humanitarian law. and an interview with canadian news

while the president of the international court of justice outlined the measures that israel must take immediate. so the course indicates the following original measures. one by 15 votes to to the state of israel shell in accordance with his obligations under the convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide in relation to this house. the names of guys that take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of article 2 is a convention, in particular, a killing members of the group be causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group. see deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction and hold for in part in the imposing measures intended to prevent birth within the group. in favor, president donahue, vice president of oregon, judges tonka. behind the noun, yourself to a bundari robinson salon. he was our noted chatsworth, french judge at hawk percent k against judge said a 10 day judge at hawk or rock by 15 votes to to the state of israel shall ensure w

washington dc, a couple of at the white house in attempts to use the verdict from the international court of justice as a kind of indication, we simply have said consistently, we find that that, that, that claim is, is on sounds. and you know that the court also did not find israel guilty of just a final decision on whether this is genocide is likely years away. but the court did order israel to avoid civilian casualties and to allow more aid into the gaza strip. us as it has asked israel to do both, but the bombing continues, the starvation spreading. if it continues, this will likely end up before the un security council, which has the power to impose economic sanctions, banned the sale of weapons, or even authorize the use of force. but many experts believe us simply will not let that happen. they really are not going to abandon israel when it comes to guys, or they will put pressure on them to behave more rationally. and i think they're gonna start putting pressure on them soon to wind down the main part of the conflict. but they're not going to vote against them in the security council. you, as

of justice is hud. um, to guarantee the implementation of the order issued by the international court of justice. i thank you. i thank the representative of algeria follow that statement. i now give the flow to the representative of the united states. thank you, man and president. good morning to all in thank you to under secretary general griffith for your briefing. there's no doubt that humanitarian, the humanitarian situation in gaza is the, is dar yesterday, senior coordinator colleague, outline steps the you in proposes to take to accelerate and expand the delivery of aide at scale. i was pleased that the counsel endorsed and united behind her plan because her success is the you and success in gaza. the question before us today is what more can be done to facilitate her work to help expedite safe on hindered and expanded humanitarian access as call for in resolutions 27122720. some members have argued that the provisional measures ordered by the international court of justice. our reason to change course, the but in many ways the courts measure is reaffirm the framework that we put in place w

the international court of justice also said it has jurisdiction to rule in the case. it added that israel must improve the humanitarian situation in the besieg territory and allow in aid. the icj however fell short of ordering the regime to end this onslaught on the strip. "the course rulings are final and binding, but it has no powers to enforce them. palestinian assistant foreign minister armar hijazi calls on all states to ensure that the top un cause orders are completely enforced. israel now will stand trial accused of committing the crime of..." all crimes, we call on states that to ensure that all provisional measures ordered by the court are implemented. states and governments have clear obligations in light of this order. first and foremost, they must make sure they are not complicit in this genocide. this is a good day for humanity. this ruling is in favor of international system based on law. and against exceptionalism and double standards. it should be a wake up call for israel and its enablers. the state of palestine will undertake every endeavor to follow

court's decision, saying the ruling is in favor of humanity and international law. palestine welcomes the provisional measures ordered by the international court of justice today. the icj judges assess the facts and law, they ruled in favor of humanity and international law. we call in all states to ensure that all provisional measures ordered by the court are implemented including by israel the occupy power, this is binding legal obligation. states now have a clear legal obligations to stop israel's genocidal war on the palestinian people in gaza and to make sure that they are not complicit. rad al maliki said the icj ruling is an important reminder that no one is above the law. he said the order serves as a wake up call for israel and all its allies. enabled the regimes entrenched impunity. israeli prime minister on the other hand called the order a disgrace, it won't be erased for generations. b to continue the onslot until what he called the elimination of all threats and the release of all captives in gaza. reactions are pouring in to the interm ruling by the international court of justice on the geneside case against israel. the european union said it want

laid out such a details. expensive and gruesome genocide case in front of the international court of justice. south africa has made a compelling argument that the world's highest court tooth or israel to stop its military campaign in gaza as soon as possible. urgent injunctions by the international court of justice of binding. but the world's highest court has no power to enforce them. it will establish something very important that 3rd state countries cannot escape. this is the crime of old crimes genocide. and once the court establishes that, this is the good thing guys, at least plus the states will find it very hard to escape that as possibilities on friday is round. we'll respond to the genocide accusations. it supports us already gearing up at the bees palace to backup its defense. step 5 and l g 0 the he a 100 south who joins us now from occupied east jerusalem. so i am the, what's been the reaction in israel to today's events of the hey, reactions across the aisle coming from is really officials. let's begin with the prime minister benjamin netanyahu, who said that what's being broug

southern gaza strip with an air strike during the international court of justice session. clearly unashamed of israel's war mongering ways, israeli lawyers took to the international court of justice the following day to further attempt to justify the unjustifiable. israel's lawyer malcolm shaw from leicester university in britain came across as unorganized and arrogant. "someone has shuffled my papers," he grumbled as he staggered through. his address, a widely criticized move took place when western news channels that ignored south africa's presentation at the international court of justice, live streamed israel's response to it an of censorship by omission. the german government has announced that it will seek to intervene in the international court of justice to support israel. possibly out of dread for its own faith, as german armamen sales to israel soored a thousand percent in 2023, with fast tracking system established in october. as a result, germany not only continue to arm israel throughout its murderous war in gaza, but even increase sales to boost. israel's abil

africa has taken the step to invoke the genocide convention in charge israel in the international court of justice. while there are severe limitations to this process. "it is undeniably momentous to see israel brought before the highest international court to answer for its crime of genocide against the palestinians. the relationship between south africa and palestine is deep and cannot be underestimated. it was forged through oppression and racial subjugation. israel was key player in the development and later the malignancy of apartite rule in south africa. south africa's aparthy prime minister daniel molan was the..." first foreign prime minister to visit tel aviv following the nakba. hendrick vevad, a south african apartide architect in prime minister, even claimed in 1961 that israel, like south africa, is apartite state. that was six decades before amnesty international said the same. in order to improve the image of apathide in south africa, israel and the apathite authorities established a joint secretariat for political and psychological warfare in. in 1975. by 1981, the apartide army in

new at using is it the of time the international court of justice force israel to stop its war on concepts? south africa says that as well as attacks on the palestinians of genocidal at it's launching a legal federal video and it's top court. so when it's booked it can make any difference of who would enforce this. this is inside story the .

of civilians in gaza. historical court. palace location peace in laha is the subject of the meeting of the international court of justice to deal with south africa's complaint against the occupying regime for genocide in gaza. but the importance of the issue that makes the supporters of palestine react in this way to the words of the south african lawyer . the zionist regime, which always saw itself above international law, is now sitting in the highest court of the world as the accused , accused of the biggest crime against humanity. sharia genocide 75 years after he identified himself as a victim of genocide. if it is confirmed by this international authority and this world court that the zionist regime has committed murder, it is valid the delegitimization of the actions of the zionist regime will play a unique role. the person who has presented himself to the public opinion of the world as a shelter for the victims of genocide, if he is accused and convicted of committing genocide, then naturally he will break the words and propaganda that he started and get out of his hands. yesterday, south african lawyers present