the fifth circuit in texas was not just daca , it was extended daca . >> they extended the age of daca eligibility and the length of time between registration . >> yes, there were two, there was a distinct daca component to it and so my only point is that , to suggest that the fifth circuit's decision castner light on that court's view of daca, i think is incorrect. on the equal protection, counsel says that there has been enough to create a plausible influence of a negative attitude. now, that is not a standard that i believe can be found anywhere in determining and reviewing the exercise of prosecutorial discretion . >> what would the standard be? >> i believe the standard is clear evidence and adc makes clear that in the immigration context, in particular, the standard is extremely high and that you could proceed and go to get discovery on the basis of a possible inference, which we don't think exists, but even if you thought you had a plausible inference, that would not be enough to survive a motion to dismiss. that's all the council can even claim for it. and that is entirely righ

lo malo, que no dijo nada. >> despuÉs javier becerra, el fiscal general de california, Íi mencionÓ daca oportunidad de conocer, compartir mi historia con diferentes congresistas senadores tuve la oportunidad de hablar con el senador el cual que fue el que empezÓ todo lo del crim"dream ay todo lo del daca tambiÉn, y decir a la comunidad q ellos pu poÓlido aparte de daca, claro que sÍ. >> ivÁn da gusto escuchar eso, y ojalÁ se convierta en realidad, gracias braspor esa entrevista e siga siendo un digno representante de la comunidad. >> muchas gracias por la oportunidad, me siento muy orgulloso y saludos a todos y Íi se puede, vamos daca. >> anoche otra cosa que llamÓ la atenciÓn, es que hubo muchos gestos que tambiÉn llamaron la atenciÓn de las redes sociales uno de ellos, el de la presidenta cÁmara de representantes nancy pelosi fue su aplauso sarcÁstico al presidente, dirigiendo sus palmas hacia el cuando hablÓ de la necesidad de conseguir mÁs compromisos polÍticos para avanzar en la agenda nacional, fue la manera que tuvo de otro quien era el superviviente designado, el de ayer fue el

daca, in many regards, is a step toward amnesty, and that is a nonstarter.ing to this country, as the president said tonight, legally. >> ed: when you dig in on that as they were not going to accept amnesty, doesn't that suggest we are far apart from getting a deal? >> it could be, but there again, the shutdown makes all the difference in the world. the democrats can blame the president all right, he said i will take ownership of this thing. that works for the first little while, but after 35 days, at some point when the democrats refused to come to the table, they not only share blame and the shutdown, but they become responsible parties in it. hopefully we are in a different ball game now and will avoid the shutdown and get the border security. >> ed: we have nine days to figure that out. cumbersome and jody hice, we appreciate you coming in. let's get more analysis, former deputy assistant to george w. bush, brad langman, richard fowler, and host of the next revolution right here in fox news, steve hilton, thanks for sticking around. >> good to be with yo

the dreamers are twice the number of the daca recipients. so in his comments, he said he wanted to protect the daca. what he did was take the projections a way that daca had, he took away the temporary protective status that our country had, and took away the initiative by president obama to facilitate amnesty. he took those away, then he said, i am going to give these back to you temporarily, if you give me a wall. he shouldn't have taken them away in the first place. these protections were there until you decided to take them away. so now you're going to come back and say, i will give them back to you for three years? that is not protection. protection is something that has certainty to it. so it was really disappointing. having said that about what the president did, i take these -- these are protections that exist, i will take them away, i will give them to you temporarily, you give me a wall permanently. a nonstarter. and then in terms of this negotiation, it is up to the conferees, but the point is, what is the best way to protect our

se recomienda que utilicen un daca. >> quizÁs aplico aplica para el daca y el proceso de deportaciÓneranza que por lo menos las personas que tienen daca sÍ podrÁn legalizarse aquÍ en los estados unidos el resto de los inmigran inmigrantes no creo que veamos una reforma de 11 millones beneficiar a los 700.000 muchachos que actualmente que estÁn recibiendo daca. >> estÁn jovencitos >>> quizÁs un nuevo dÍa. >> que nos tienen que ellos >> adelante buenos dÍas. >> muy buenos dÍas >>> mi querida rashel. >> el llamado dueÑo del universo es lunes 4 de febrero primer lunes de este aÑo 2019. >> para este signo para los signos del zodÍaco. >> aries, felicidad mÁxima las mieles del Éxito serÁn tan grande que recordar para el resto de tu vida prepÁrate porque viene grande y bonito mis amados tauros. >> sobre todo contratos nuevos maravillosas vienen para ti, prepÁrate mi amado tauro. >> para gÉminis le cambia la vida para estos prÓximos dÍas porque el mes de febrero para gÉminis serÁ maravilla to so para el amor. >> si anda solo, sola, prepÁrese porque es para tener una pareja nueva. >> cÁncer ho

un abogado criminalista para que limpiara su rÉcord, hay algo que podamos hacer para recuperar su dacaes un delito menor, pero es de droga, o es algo de violencia domÉstica, o manejar bajo la influencia de alcohol o drogas estos delitos aunque sean menores, puede ser que una persona sea in elegible para el daca, sino hacerlo desde ahora rr alma rosa lo mencionabas tÚ, hoy es dÍa de redes sociales contigo, los invitamos que se conecten con nosotros, en jueves de inmigraciÓn, no la dejen pasar, es una buena oportunidad para ustedes, gracias alma rosa. >> a ti, gracias. >> la ciudad californiana de san francisco se vio sacudida por una fuerte explosiÓn que quemo 5 edificios provocando el pÁnico en las calles, esto obligÓ a la evacuaciÓn de otros edificios cercanos, los bomberos tuvieron trabajando mÁs de 3 horas para apagar el incendio, la causa se debiÓ que los trabajadores cortaron una tuberÍa de gas natural, increÍblemente nadie perdiÓ la vida. >> al regresar en noticias telemundo mediodÍa, smithsonian, abre su primer galerÍa dedicaba a la cultura latina. >> a la madre no le dio tiempo

the president offered the daca before and the democrats said no.nder? so, the democrats will say, rinse, president trump, you created the dreamer problem when you yanked it. >> this problem started with former president obama. he had an opportunity to fix it. instead he bypassed congress and decided to do things on his own. and that's where we stand. he brought a temporary solution. and we need a permanent solution. i think daca is unconstitutional. it needs to go through congress. liz: you are saying the president is right on daca and dreamers. what about the border wall? pelosi is calling the border wall immoral. >> i'm disappointed in the democratic party. they are self-imploding. their message is not on point. they are going so far to the right -- liz: to the left -- >> -- sorry, the left. you look at the governor of virginia, you look at abortion and taxes. the thing about me is they never brought a solution or a counter offer to the table on daca. that's very disappointing. liz: are dreamers saying they are upset? >> absolutely. 2020. they ar

nancy pelosi never wanted to have any conversations about daca and solving that problem. if you remember, it was chuck schumer over a year ago who had that same offer on the table to solve this for 22 problem and he walked away from the deal after initially supporting it because people on the left went nuts bee they don't want to solve the daca problem. they want it to remain a political pond. that's a fact of this matter. president trump has been trying to solve this problem for years. the democrats have walked away every single time on solving daca. >> martha: in terms of the national emergency, is this a political perilous position that the president is taking place make you hurt representative maloney. he said democrats and a number of conservative republicans are very much against this move. >> first of all, you have to look at what the president's main objective is and that's to keep america safe. it's not just a campaign promise he makes. that was something that we all take an oath, by the way. president trump kept that same oath to keep the country safe. we have a

however, it is a nonstarter, because the democrats right now have taken daca off the table.it was an issue, we could address it we would read that and look at it, and see what is as. but the fact they said, it was a no go really surprised me. the people who spoke longest, nancy pelosi took to floor for about 8 hour filibuster, basically to protect daca last year. now they have walked away from it there are other issues, that are more important to them. we just have to find out who those issues are and negotiate. >> this scott martin. what happens after friday, saying there is no deal. you mentioned the aversion for a shut down, what another extension for a couple more weeks, where you have ice cream together and figure something how the? >> well eternal ast optimist from me is we want a deal done friday, congress works better when we're up against deadlines. unless we say we're going to get it done, if we look at a delay tactic we don't. if we're moving closer and clock is about ready to run out it would be pre preferable to havea short-term solution to avoid a shut down. da

why not give the president the money and renegotiate daca? >> i want to bring in -- we have devin nunes. the ranking republican. he joins us now. representative nunes, let's started with this vote. more importantly, the idea of a national emergency. where do you stand on this? >> i agree with your panel. i was standing here. i think we need everything on the table. we need to deal with daca, we need to have a work permit system. that is really what we should be doing. the democrats haven't wanted to come to the table. they promised they would take care of immigration, this is the obvious time to take care of the daca kids. but near not willing to put something on the table. so you know, what we're left with is barely starting the wall but a true solution is real border security with a real worker permit system and dealing with the people that are here. that's what the american people should expect from us. >> that goes without saying i think at this point and that's not what is being delivered from washington d.c. and a very long period of ti

about digress when i talk daca. . the third thing to remember is that ball is 1/7 the cost of -- that wall is 1/7 the cost of foreign aid in this country. is that too big of an amount? is that something we can't handle? that's not true. the next thing to remember is when other presidents were building the wall, there were no objections around here. l of a sudden, in 2019, when president trump is president, in part due to the radicalization of some members of this body, and in part due to personal disease like of president trump, -- dislike of president trump, too many people are willing to continue to allow people to stream across the border with drugs, violent people, with disregard to their fellow citizens not to give president trump a win. and in part because their ideology is switched and they really don't need a wall at all. the next thing to remember is walls work. if anybody questions walls work, look at the wall between san diego and tijuana. look at the wall between israel and egypt. look at the wall between

daca.rancisco. ramÓn: este fin de semana las condiciones eran cÁlidas pero parece que hay sorpresa. con estas imÁgenes vamos a colocarnos con elena que ya estÁ preparada como siempre. elena: buenas noches. comenzamos viendo cÓmo estuvieron las temperaturas en san josÉ, se reportÓ una mÁxima de 56 grados, continuamos con temperaturas por debajo de la mÁxima histÓrica. en fresno se reportÓ 53 grados, 55 sacramento. quÉ pasarÁ esta prÓxima madrugada? afortunadamente continuaremos disfrutando de condiciones secas en toda el Área de la bahÍa. serÁ otra madrugada frÍa son nuestra regiÓn. maÑana viernes, disfrutaremos de condiciones secas, el sÁbado tendremos cielos mayormente nublados, temperaturas oscilando entre los 53 y 5x grado. en el pronÓstico extendido, maÑana sÁbado vamos a tener el cielo parcialmente nublado. a inicios de la prÓxima semana, van a estar regresando las lluvias asociados con el paso de otro frente frÍo por la regiÓn. no sÓlo traerÁ lluvia sino descenso de las temperaturas.

on daca, the president had the authority to not deport children who had arrived here. was what -- >> but he went beyond that. >> he went beyond that and gave work permits. >> i hate to do this. we have to take a break. don't worry, you're not going anywhere. a decision by amazon is dividing the democratic party. we'll talk about that and this, next. to be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing it's best to make you everybody else... ♪ ♪ means to fight the hardest battle, which any human being can fight and never stop. does this sound dismal? it isn't. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. ♪ ♪ it's the most wonderful life on earth. who transition out of the u.s. formilitary every year...ers ...one of the toughest parts is the search for a job that takes advantage of the skills you've gained while serving. you can now search with the phrase 'jobs for veterans' directly on google... ...and then enter your military occupational specialty code. google brings together job openings from across the web that match the skills you gained in your military role. just cl

it surprises me they don't mention daca at all.eather: it was on the table and is not on the table anymore. do you blame him for that? >> the country is looking at democrats, and they don't want to see get fixed. and the american people -- >> bipartisan tone continues for the rest of this week. >> time is running out. heather: thanks for joining us. 20 minutes until the top of the hour. many are calling this the moment of the night, donald trump congratulating female members of congress, leading cheers and chants on both sides of the aisle. it was something to see. carly shimkus has the top trending moments. i know what it means to have reliable support. i found a company who believes in me. they look out for me. and they help me grow my career. at comcast it's my job to constantly monitor our network, prevent problems, and to help provide the most reliable service possible. my name is tanya, i work at the network operations center for comcast. we're working to make things simple, easy and awesome. heather: donald trump praising th

dismisssaws, he wa simply trying to work within the framework of our immigration laws in dealing with daca and gram.apa pro here president trump is not

nosotros en california lanzamosla demanda que ha preservado el programa de daca, pero necesitamos unapermanente. eel presidente con su firma puede cambiar la ansiedad que estÁ enfrentando los soÑadores. jorge: javier becerra, fiscal federal de california. gracias por estar con nosotros. te escuchamos en un momento. ilia: bueno, vamos a regresar a nuestra discusiÓn. quisiera preguntarles, ¿cÓmo ven el discurso de este aÑo con el del aÑo pasado? el del aÑo pasado fue el primer discursodel estado de la uniÓn del presidente trump, pero hay quizÁs más tensiÓn entre presidente y congresistas? >> creo que el aÑo pasado fue un discurso polÉmico. hemos visto un sistemÁtico y fallido ataque contra nuestra comunidad en su polÍtica antiinmigrante. por ejemplo, Él cancelÓ el tps. esto daÑÓ las familias hondureÑas, salvadoreÑos, haitianos. separÓ inhumanamente a los niÑos debes inocentes de sus padres y los enjaulÓ. esta fue una grave violaciÓn a los derechos humanos. fue un secuestroilegal e inmoral. y finalmente, engaÑÓ a los soÑadores. en pocas palabras, este hombre sigue con su retÓrica repugna

we can see push back, see people using the same playbook that republicans used to stop daca saying that was an overreach of executive order. people told the president perhaps he should sign this bill, he's getting 55 miles of new barrier. but in the end i think he caved not to his advisers not to nancy pelosi, but to the people you pointed out before, the conservative commentators that can get under his skin, and that's what drove his decision.

his executive action took away congress' authority to act and daca still isn't solved. these unilateral actions by president obama put more power in the hands of unelected people sitting in cubicles in washington, d.c., and they turned elected representatives into elected bystanders. when representatives become irrelevant, citizens become irrelevant, and we the people are powerless against faceless, unelected bureaucrats. unilateral executive actions set bad precedent. if it's ok for the executive branch to act alone, after the legislative branch doesn't reach an agreement, where does that take us? governor jay inslee said he would be willing to declare a national emergency on climate change, allowing for drastic federal action that would -- that would never have to be approved by congress. what if, without any congressional approval, a future president used a national emergency to take ney from our v.a. clinics, force management at a national forest to force a green new deal on the american people? whether it's at the border or upholding the separation of powers in our

. >> the big difference here is what the president did on daca, on president obama and what he did onre counter to what the congress wanted but he had absolutely no authority to do so, none. in this case congress passed a law which gives the president broad authority to do it. obama was blatant and unconstitutional. no democrat fought obama. everyone said he is dpoioing wh we want to we are all for it. >> i'm sorry can we -- >> on the. >> on daca he did not. >> but he went beyond that. >> he went beyond that. >> i hate to do this but we have to take a quick break. we have a lot more to talk about. >> we have to come back on this. >> a decision by amazon is dividing the democratic party. we'll talk about that next. when you're ready for what comes next. at fidelity, we make sure you have a clear plan to cover the essentials in retirement, as well as all the things you want to do. and on the way, you'll get timely investment help to keep you on the right track, without the unnecessary fees you might expect from so many financial firms. because when you have a partner who gives you clari

should lay out a new offer tonight to the american people that includes the dreamers and includes dacaa big package, some kind of immigration reform to be laid out there. his answer to that in just a moment. first, let's go to chief congressional correspondent mike emanuel who is live on capitol hill as we await the president tonight. hi, mike. >> martha, good evening to you. president trump's state of the union address will be the big focus here on capitol hill and across the country tonight. white house press secretary sarah sanders says the main theme will be choose greatness. >> i think the point that the president will make tonight is when we work together we can do great things. and we have a choice to make. we can either work together and fix big problems that america is facing or we can ignore them and do nothing. >> on the other side senate democratic leader chuck schumer sounds skeptical about the president's call for unity. >> so if president trump calls for a new ear wrath bipartisanship forgive me we will wait to see if he is serious this time. because if past states of th

it was challenged in court and upheld. >> not daca, the epa, not the daca one. >> yeah, i said daca. and the court's ruled. the wall has been a game to trump, it is not a real issue, tas game he uses to entice his base. no matter what happens in court, whether he wins or loses, head, he wins, tails we lose, doesn't matter. he will find a way to make that issue work for him and his base and they will buy into whatever answer, whatever response he has because that's the kind of control he has over the people that support him and the value they get from him being president. >> what would you advise a presidential candidate on the democratic side of the aisle to handle immigration, don't bother talking to him and his base, talk to independents that clearly want something in between what the two parties are offering? >> i actually don't. i actually would argue that they have to make the argument on immigration to everybody, whether these people vote for them or not. i think targeting certain voters who you think are open to you is part of the reason we got into the mess where we had donal

it was a digging into daca, not extending the protection the way you guys wanted but is daca on the tableo-week extension? >> no, and a temporary protection for daca and tps is not on the table either. if they want to come to the table with a permanent solution, we're all ears. >> so you have given that up for now? >> well, we have this deal on the table. so, adding the other dynamics at this point makes it too complicated. so, we're trying to focus specifically on the homeland security appropriations bill which is our task in funding government without including the other priorities. some of them, i want those priorities. but this is not the opportunity to do that. we were given a short window and a limited run delay in order to develop that framework and in order to fund all of these priorities that we have. >> what is your guess that this gets done by friday? >> we can get this done. this is a bipartisan deal and what we need to reinforce to the american public and our communities and our colleagues is that nobody gets everything that they want in this deal, but this advances the ball.

. >> any immigration compromise here should extend the right of daca, either to resolve daca and extend tps. that has to be a part of this. >> there is one other thing. everybody keeps talking about the wall. the problem that we're facing with many of these things are located in these countries that are our neighbors, and we're not doing enough to help them to solve their problems, whether it's economic aid or security aid, but i believe that the daca folks, that that should be done, and it should be part of this deal. tps, i don't know how you figure all that out. but we don't want these people living under fear every day that they're going have to leave. >> senator santorum on daca? >> thing is a compromise that will include some element of daca, some element of these tpa folks. >> the thrill in your voice, though. >> look, it's a compromise. i don't know about too many people that get thrilled when you compromise, but you do it. and that's the whole idea. you need to do it, and i think the president will do it. van, to suggest that when the president and republicans and conservatives

and i think on top of that he ought to take care of daca kids.e a permanent solution to border security and our daca kids and temporary protection for a lot of people that have come from other countries during crisis. >> just one point of clarification. president obama and the democrats and republicans including marco rubio your senator did try to work out a deal in 2013 to pass legislation that would add billions in border security and take care of the daca kids. so legislation was attempted there before the president, president obama at that point, took executive action. one last question. you're in puerto rico, obviously, where the rebuilding efforts are so active and necessary and in some cases still in need and in want. you said before you don't want the president to declare kpae executive action that would take funding from puerto rico, correct? >> absolutely. i don't believe -- i mean, you look at the wildfires in california, you look at the hurricanes in texas and florida and here, this many needs to be allocated by the federal government

no problem with a fix for daca.ea of a caravan. no mass caravan. what people that support this president want. takes emergency declaration. didn't say it last night. i think he will do it. steve: we'll see what happens. tom, pete, morgan. david. thank you very much. president trump praising woman during the state. union address? >> we have more women in the workforce than ever before. don't sit yet. you will like this. steve: how much do you like it? we have dials you won't see anywhere else. what are voters saying for the speech. todd piro, "breakfast with friends." check in with him next. ♪ >> tech: at safelite autoglass we know that when you're spending time with the grandkids every minute counts. and you don't have time for a cracked windshield. that's why we show you exactly when we'll be there. saving you time, so you can keep saving the world. >> kids: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ my teemotionally, socially. very sore spot for me, if i would've known that i was gonna be 50 times happier... i would've

licenseanna wiernicki: but because of the deferred action for childhood arrivals program--known as daca, bernardo was able to graduate from college in the u-s. bernardodreamer from utahtake cg @ 0:18-0:24i have a job permanent resolution for dreamers my future is uncertain.anna wiernicki: bernardo says 1.2 million dreamers are facing a nightmarenot knowing if they will deportedanhed says their best bet to e that doesn't happen are these two republican lawmakers. republicans will hurd and dan newhouse are calling on their colleagues to create a permanent legislative fix for dacadan newhouse: a missed opportunity to finally put this issue behind us//will hurd: why was a daca fix taken off the table during these current negotiations.anna wiernicki (stand up) @annaewiernickitake cg @ 0:55- 1:02they say congress dropped the ball this week by not including daca in the border security deal lawmakers introduced to avoid another government shutdown on friday. anna wiernicki: hurd says he is working with republicans áand introduce legislation that would give dreamers full and permanent protection

clyburn said it was a nonstarter for daca recipients. >> neil: there's no way daca will be part of iton. it's thefervor of the anti-trump mentality -- >> you spent two years portraying the president as literal hitler -- >> the problem that trump has during the campaign and i talked to people like rudy saying the wall stuff is all baloney. you know, rudy guliani. all of he's guys, it's just a talking point. guess what? it's a talking point that is etched in everybody's memory and that they were going to pay for. it's hard to put that genie back in the bottle. the payment, the finance was supposed to come from mexico and it's not happening. >> neil: i can't see a shut down at all. >> we had one already. >> and we're no further along. his numbers didn't really take a hit. >> neil: he can declare an emergency. mitch mcconnell is more concerned about that than anything else. >> he should be. >> if he declares an emergency, he's pulling from the defense department budget. if he wants to convince it's better to take money from the military, good luck with that. >> mitch mcconnell is more wor

and the democrats stepped away from the daca issue. liz: the democrats are saying president trump started this by yanking daca. the argument against that is daca was started by president trump as an end in run around congress. i think the american voters, the polls are saying stop, move on to other bigger things, right? let, twitch gears. nancy pelosi says she thinks the public does want to see president trump's tax returns. you were in the house ways and means committee hearing. what did you hear today. what mapped? >> i'm a ranking member on the subcommittee on oversight. the oversight committee's job is to be the watchdog for merit can taxpayer. the issue today was we need the public display of the president's tax returns. if i were to say to the people in my district, the president, the vice president's tax returns are under audit by the irs. there is a special counsel that can look at the president's tax returns. when the issue comes down to making sure one taxpayer's tax returns are made public, it's a political issue. the presid

empleo esta en peligro >> tal vez me tengan que hasta c correr >> empezÓ el proceso de renovar su dacaon la demora en estos trÁmite >> el servicio de inmigraciÓn ya habÍa advertido que habia demoras porque estÁ ahogado en todo tipo de solicess y 130 par residencia, de ciudadanÍa, para renovar la tarjeta red de res e >> recomienda hacer los trÁmite hasta con cinco meses de anticipaciÓn y a los que estÁn en el caso del soÑador tratar de presionar a la agencia escribiendo y explicando la situaciÓn desesperada en que se encuentran >> el miedo constante de que nos la renovaciÓn estÁ en tramite todavÍa tienen su estatus vigente aclaran expertos pero si se tropiezan con inmigraciÓn tendrÍan que pelear para demostrarl >> la persona no se va a ninguna parte pero va a pasar el mal rato de ser detenido por ahÍ >> rosales dice que saldrÁ poco y restarÁ mucho hasta que llegu su permiso en daca noticias t e telemundo crece la expectativa por el superbowl en especial los angelinos que esperan que su equipo se imponga en la sÚper final o marÍa hablÓ con algunos de ellos que se estÁn curando las uÑas d

and we get daca. we get something we want. why not compromise? >> we're not bargaining chips.arate issue. >> but you are. >> but we shouldn't be. we shouldn't be in that position. if he feels he wants to use us as bargaining chips, what he's doing is scapegoating. >> he's using you as a bargaining trip. i think that's pretty obvious. but congress, you know, if congress doesn't want that, they can pass a clean dream act, but they're not going to do that. i don't think there's the political will right now to do that. >> would you support it if they were to do that? >> yeah, yeah, i would support it if they were to have a clean dream act. but i think in reality, they're going to have to compromise. they're going to have to give trump something he wants to get daca. >> i think he's playing the devil's advocate. >> of course he is. >> i really do, trump is playing the devil's advocate to propel us to do something. >> yes. >> and that's what i'm hoping. >> yes, that's what he's doing. >> the more he degrades us with the comment, the more anger, and maybe the democrats will agree and

and how he stood in front of a camera and said the presidential overreach and when you talk about daca and you should not use your emergency powers do such things as this and it was a slippery slope and unconness tutional, but to now stand back and allow this to happen, in january of 2021, if there is, and we hope there to be a democratic president, and day one they declare a national emergency or gun violence in this country which is running rampant, on day one if they declare a national mng on climate change, which is destroying this earth that we've inherited, then i think republicans are going to all out have a hissy fit. and the problem that we're seeing is that no one right now is having any conviction. there's not one republican, there's not one republican who stands on the side of the constitution. that's the biggest problem. >> all right. bakari, jeffrey, alice, thank you very much for all of your varied perspectives on this. >> thanks, alisyn. >>> he's the first trop say repo say he wants to challenge president trump in 2020. we talk to william weld on whether he thinks he ha

selling out dreamers and daca that's all they cared about. another update from the "hannity" watch on the deep state. the hate trump media caught reporting another collusion hoax today. remember when every media outlet speculated donald trump junior called his father with a blocked phone number ahead of his meeting with the russians when they talked about immigration and adoption? according to reports, fake news, never happened. fake news cnn do you ever get tired of being wrong and embarrassing yourself? here with a lot of reaction. all right. enough fentanyl they got today to kill 54 million americans, geraldo. we are losing 300 people a week to opioid crisis. cartel, drugs, human trafficking, don't you think that is enough to build a wall and we will have a door? >> i think that nancy pelosi is being very spiteful and being unreasonable not to allow the president of the united states and his professionals to repair, replace and expand the over600 miles of border fencing we already have. having said that, the fentanyl came through a port of

if they're convicted of such crime, they lose daca. what do they want?y want to stay here,to stud and to work and to help this country grow that's why executives like the ones you named and others are speaking up and saying it is time to do something for them. i heard your wonderful reporter ylan saying they're not in the deal once again, you know, it makes me very sad. the dream act was introduced in 2001, poll after poll, including your own nbc poll says 80 or 85% of americans support it. once again, nothing is being done and we count on the leaders of congress and the president all of whom have spoken up for the dreamers, including president trump, to do something this year. >> don, thinking back to an op-ed in "the washington post" prior to the shutdown and urging democrats to exchange a daca deal for some wall funding obviously didn't work out that way. was that a missed opportunity? >> from the dreamers' point of view it was. that was the first op-ed, the dreamers have republican support and democratic support the president at one point offered to

daca is not included in the deal at all.rats offered $25 billion for a border barrier in exchange for permanent protection for the daca population. do you think democrats missed an opportunity to get something done on daca here? >> no. i think that would have been a deal breaker with the white house and the republicans sadly. the president created this problem by rescinding the executive order that protected dreamers. while he professed to be sympathetic to their plight, he has done nothing to be helpful. every deal we have presented to him, he's rejected. >> i would just note that, as you know, some would say, look, the obama administration chose to use an executive order which can be reversed by the next president instead of doing it through congress. there have been many attempts on comprehensive immigration reform. >> i would say in response to that obama faced a republican congress that wouldn't pass the legislation. he had no choice if he was going to protect dreamers but to resort to executive order. of course i find

and said, they'll give you your wall money if you give them this, if it's a temporary extension of daca, democrats are not going to accept that, right? >> nothing on temporary, john. i think the other thing is, let's remember that there have been moments in the past not very long ago where this president was given a grand bargain because he asked for it. and it was a bipartisan grand bargain. and then what happened? the stephen millers and the ann coulters and everybody else from his base who told him don't you dare make this deal that really would allow any additional -- whether it's protections for the daca students or any additional even legal immigration, that is something that, to your point, margaret, is anathema to his base. but even further, what the president is going to face tonight is something he has not faced before. he's going to look out into the audience to a new democratically controlled audience that has more women, a lot more latinos, a lot more americans and a lot more muslims. this we cannot score more because these are the people that have felt besieged and attacke

gorka, it is clear that all the talk about dreamers, daca, for i lloyd employees, it is al. they lied, they hate trump more than they actually care about the dreamers and child separation. they want to meet with moms and dads. that's permanent separation. why? >> they will not even comment. nancy pelosi still hasn't commented on the murder of ronil singh, a legal immigrant by an illegal alien. so it has nothing to do with their morality she would have us believe. we know this because they actually voted for it in 2006. theyth voted on border security. let's be very clear. this is just politics. this is about votes, this has nothing tout do with securing te nation. we need to remind nancy pelosi, there is only one person in america who is responsible for the national security of america, and it's not nancy pelosi. it's not chuck schumer. nancy is 1 of hundreds of representatives who just happens to be speaker of the house, an internal decision of the congress, of the party. there is one person responsible for our safety, sean, and it's the president. president trump takes adm

we need to provide immediate legal status for the young people eligible for the daca program and provide a humane policy for those at the border who seek asylum. e am running because w must end the epidemic of gun violence in this country. we need to take on the nra, expand background checks, and the gun show loophole -- end the gun show loophole. we need a foreign policy that focuses on democracy, human rights, and world peace. world inmust lead the improving international againstion in the fight climate change, militarism, authoritarianism, and global wealth inequality. that is why we need one million people to join our campaign and help lead the movement that can accomplish all of these goals. there is a lot, of frightening and bad news in this world. now let me give you some good news that we should all be proud of. three years ago during our 2016 campaign, when we brought forth our progressive agenda, we were and our ideas were radical they were extreme. we were told medicare for all, a $15 an hour minimum wage, free tuition at colleges and universities, combating climate change, de

then you're in the daca situation. and each one you'll see litigated. if he does it as national emergency, under the 76 act. that has to be a dangerous precedent. what's the chance the next democratic president doesn't use exactly that act to declare global warming? a national emergency. >> exactly. it plays for both parties. we fought the revolutionary war not to have king george. this is the actions of the king. no matter which route it will be challenged in the kout. it's a violation of the separation of power. and power of congress. he went through this for two months with the 35 day shut down. and we haven't had a national emergency. that's not true. there's no national emergency. border immigration or is down. 40 year low. there's not a problem with drugs coming in through the border where they build the wall. drogs come in through ports of entry. and submarines, trucks, cars. he used tunnels. he never went through texas. that's not where drugs come from. it's a false narrative. a political issue for the president. and this is on his ego and his p

>> morgan: this is being compared a lot to president obama's move as it comes to daca.'m not a lawyer but i talked to a few people trying to get a better understanding of the difference between when president obama made the daca move versus president trump's national emergency move. one of the points that was made is that daca, it was an abuse of prosecutorial discretion. that's a long word for monday. essentially, they could say, "i'm not going to prosecute you, melissa, because you're here illegally. i will not use my resources to do that." there's a difference between saying, "not only a manic way to prosecute you, i will confer legal status on you." so the president and his team could point to many things that will have a national emergency. that's where they will parse the difference between what president obama did and what president trump has done. >> kennedy: is interesting because so much power screen shifted the supreme court. if it does make its way to the supreme court, that will become critical for liberals and conservatives. because conservatives will see

jorge: los chicos de daca son protegidos por tribunales de justicia.io. lo mismo sucede con el tps porque ya se determinÓ que no puede ser cancelado y es especÍficamente para nicaragüenses, haitianos y hondureÑos que quedan fuera por no participar de la demanda. para hondureÑos el programa vence hasta el 5 de enero de 2020el resto sigue amparado por el tps hasta que la corte decida lo contrario como ha sucedido con daca. aranza: los demÓcratas dicen que esto podrÍa ser algo bueno porque en vez de ligar estas negociaciones al futuro de esta gente, que se puede tomar un tema aparte para buscar una reforma migratoria integral. esto podrÍa ocurrir. jorge: hay una promesa clara por parte de pelosi. ella prometiÓ al asumir en el congreso que los demÓcratas para intentar este aÑo aprobar un proyecto de ley para legalizar permanentemente a los dreamers como a la gente con tps. el dilema o incertidumbre estÁ en el senado que está controlado por republicanos quienes no han dicho que se llegarÁn a la iniciativa. es mÁs de millÓn de personas con mÁs de 20 aÑos y f

it was over daca. the president offered a daca solution. permanent solution but a temporary solution. democrats did not do that. why? because they did not want to come to agreement. they want ad government shutdown. be careful what you wish for. now daca is not in the agreement. melissa: how do you think the president moves forward next after this, on this issue? you know, so say you go ahead, you get the 55 miles. this issue goes past. what would you suggest is the next thing he does on this front. >> i would say when the money is absorbed into the economy and used both for humanitarian, technical, manpower and border security, physical barriers, then you go back to congress. you give congress the opportunity to do the right thing f they don't do it, the president should do what he need to do to protect america but there will never be another government shutdown. melissa: is 55 miles enough of a win for his base when he said he would go out and build a wall and you know the whole nine yards? is this enough? >> yes. because it is a continui

obama did daca by executive order and it's being litigated in the courts.istration's position was we don't begin to have the resources to deport everyone, so we have to pick who we are going to deport and who we are not going to deport and we will take a conscious decision not to deport young people who were brought here illegally through no fault of their own who are in college, or working. that was the daca deal, and the vulnerability is that it can be challenged or canceled by the next president, as president trump dance old -- canceled da ca. concerns you express about barack obama using the executive order to make daca happen? guest: a national emergency is not the normal exercise a presidential power, and the courts will determine whether obama overstepped. usinging that we are roski torrey discretion saying i cannot begin to -- using prosecutorial discretion saying i cannot deport everyone, so i'm choosing who to deport, that's very different than declaring a national emergency. national emergency powers are truly massive, it's a long way between the

put forth his proposal a few weeks ago and as he has said so at negotiations and is willing to put dacathe table and put the temporary folks on the table, to put additional funding on the table and nancy pelosi said even if you give me all of this stuff i'm not giving you a penny. you talk about $1.6 billion, that's not on the table right now. she has said no. so don't talk about there's money on the table. it's not. nancy pelosi is playing a hard ball game right now and she's banking on the fact that he will -- divide the party. >> can we point out the intellectual dishonesty of rick's last point. this is where it falters. the fact is donald trump offered for a pathway to citizenship for daca and those with tps after he took it away. it's unconstitutional and he was the one that took away their protections. >> that's not the bottom line. >> do not take away their protections and then give it back to us and say that is a deal. that's not a deal. that's not compromise. >> >> here's the reality that we'll see tomorrow night. he's going to have to pick a road to borrow from a much better m

recipients, i wish the place was filled with daca recipients. let him understand that it's only nancy pelosi who stands in their way of being in a better e today. because donald trump is bending over backwards to do that. i wouldn't be surprised, and this late hour, if you know that she's in that audience he might call her out. >> harris: if i know, i would guess of the president -- he has people. i only have you guys! we know it. all right, yeah. great point. we will move on. when it comes to the state of the union address, fox news channel is the only place you want to become along with kennedy on fox nation. that the app, get it. on tv we will have coverage all day leading up to the president's speech. for tonight's coverage, bret baier and martha maccallum will be at the helm. at the reaction late into the evening, keep it here on fox news channel. fnc, for the cool kids. the white house is not responding after federal prosecutors have issued a subpoena for documents related to the president's 2017 inauguration festivities. what they could m

can he give something on daca and for those with temporary protected status? how much is he willing to move, and can he bring more republicans alone? there are a lot of republicans very worried about what the president stands for and whether his word is a deal in the midst of a white house that has a bunch of family members that have been directing things, and then make it very uncertain for republicans and holding his side of the aisle as well. >> is talk about the democratic response. what does stacey abrams have to do, and why was she picked to deliver the democratic response? >> democrats has been very good at being counter anti-trump, but they have not been good at the aspirations for what they believe him. they talk about healthcare and some issues related to that, but stacy abrams and democrats writ large have to set forth what they believe and as themes for 2020. it's not enough just to be against trump. yet to be aspired for what your vision look like for the country. that is the test they have tonight. >> david mccuan, we appreciate your time tonight

when he changed strategies because they didn't care about daca, they didn't care about dreamers, theyt care about furloughed employees. that's it. i'm done. as if they provide every promise he kept. my fellow conservatives, i say this too. my gut instinct, with no knowledge, is that i'm 99.9% sure donald trump will use the military, may be declared a national emergency, and he will build the border wall if he. the judges and the ninth circuit. and when back in the supreme court. >> ed: quickly, virginia. the level of outrage and rightly so for a racist yearbook and yet there was virtual silence from the democratic party in all its leaders, from nancy pelosi on down, over the fact that this same man, ralph northam, supported infanticide. >> sean: infanticide. remember his words. he said i can tell you exactly what will happen. we will deliver the baby. and then will make the baby comfortable. we will comfort the baby. the mother will decide if the baby runs into difficulties whether to resuscitate the baby or not. and then we'll have a big discussion, maybe tea and crumpets, maybe a be

for daca recipients give me the permanent wall. o his grand bargain was fixing a problem he created, that, on a emporary status, in exchange for a permanent structure. >> so is there a -- is it for you to work full time as an educator without legal status? >> the difficulty isn't, the uncertainty. to plan know how much ahead. you distant know what career goals you can set for yourself. it's very difficult to always give your best when you're never sure if you're going to be able that. >> how do you present yourself for a job? know that everybody has to present proof of citizenship, to be employed? daca, which is an employment authorization, so they are not legally allowed to that as long as i present it. it's a legal document. i do have the authorization to i'm working legally. >> so when did your parents come and how? in 1994.e over yes. from what i've been told we crossed the river. mother was actually pregnant with my little sister at the time and that was it. so does that make you technically, technically would that make your l