drops everything and flies to moscow for negotiations, i’ll just note that henry kissinger was and is simultaneously the president’s national security advisor, uh, secretary of state, here he comes from such ... with a different face, begins negotiations with gromyko, with panomariov, with dobrynin on the question of how to end this crisis for one fairly clear reason: israel, well, that’s my point of view, as a political economist, israel is a sprinter, it runs excellently over short distances in such crises, and kisinger was able to understand the obvious thing that if that crisis of the 7th year drags on, then the prospects will not be... not the brightest for the state of israel, now in there is no one in washington who would understand where this crisis is developing, it is quite difficult to imagine that anthony blinkken would leave and fly somewhere, well, if for sure, yes, if exactly from october 11 to 16, he flew, but what happened is the greatest shame in history american diplomacy, we are talking about the fact that blinken was forced to wait for a reception for half a day,

profound wisdom of henry kissinger. which reflects the need for ukraine to end this war on its termswhat will ultimately prevail in washington. we are currently witnessing real political madness in washington, due to which the supply of arms to ukraine has been politicized, perhaps, thus deterring the potential use of unconventional or nuclear weapons by russia, i.e. this is not even a rational debate, it is simply a senseless fight between supporters and opponents of trump in the republican party, which will hopefully end soon, and the biden administration will get a boost financing for ukraine, including most such systems as atakams. in this way, ukraine will once again be able to control its destiny as much as possible. and one more point. i think that henry kissinger, like many people in washington, does not fully understand how ukraine can push out all russian troops from crimea and donbas, because it is a very difficult task, but in my circle of friends in washington there are military and political experts , who see that ukraine is moving in this direction, firstly, thanks to

i think that henry kissinger, like many people in washington, does not fully understand how ukraine canush out all russian troops from crimea and donbas, because it is a very difficult task. but i have friends in washington military and political experts who see ukraine moving in this direction, firstly, through its gradual advance towards the sea of ​​azov to disconnect donbas and crimea, and secondly, with the help of atakams, other longer-range missile systems , as well as ukrainian naval drones, which pose a serious threat to the crimean bridge. so it is quite possible that soon ukraine will be able to cut off crimea. without killing all the russian military, and that would force putin to negotiate terms that would ultimately be much more profitable for ukraine. dear mr. ambassador, you know, i am afraid of the so-called repetition of the afghan syndrome, yes, in particular, it is about the american election campaign, and , for example, the presidential candidate donald trump, or someone else from his political environment will start shedding false crocodile tears, saying, here you

and one more point, i think henry kissinger, like a lot of people.shington does not fully understand how ukraine can dislodge all russian troops from crimea and donbas. because this is a very difficult task. but in my circle of friends in washington, there are military and political experts who see that ukraine is moving in this direction, firstly, thanks to its gradual advancing towards the sea of ​​azov to separate donbas and crimea. and secondly, with the help of atakams, other longer-range missile systems, as well as ukrainian naval drones, which pose a serious threat to the crimean bridge. so it's entirely possible that ukraine will soon be able to cut off crimea without killing all of the russian military, and that will force putin to negotiate terms that will ultimately be much more favorable to ukraine. dear. you know, i'm afraid of the so-called repetition of the afghan syndrome, yes, in particular it is said about the american election campaign, and, for example, the presidential candidate donald trump, or someone else from his political ci

the profound wisdom of henry kissinger, which reflects the need for ukraine to end this war on her terms is what will ultimately prevail in washington. currently, we are witnessing a real political madness in washington, due to which the supply of arms to ukraine, perhaps, has been politicized, thus restraining its potential use. unconventional or nuclear weapons by russia. that is, it is not even a rational debate. this is just a pointless fight between trump supporters and opponents in the republican party, which hopefully will end soon. and the biden administration will receive settled funding for ukraine, including the majority such systems as atakams. in this way, ukraine will be able to control again. your destiny as much as possible. and one more point, i think that henry kissinger, like many people in washington, does not fully understand how ukraine can push out all russian troops from crimea and donbass, because it is a very difficult task. but in my circle of friends in washington, there are military and political experts who see that ukraine is moving in this direction. first

and now he's could it be henry kissinger really. okay. but it says these people are so out of their depth. let me go to a side because we're running out of time here. as on. i think the region for the most part. now what makes it different now is that they're not as afraid of the united states as they used to be. do you agree with that or that kind of that oh yes, definitely. because um, but with the emergence of multiple out of it, i mean, you can see lots of countries changing their traditional positions about for the multiply to. we could have hardly seen it on and sold a, b a and a called follow up countries, basically normalizing data relations. but for multiple large gain, we could hardly have seen touchy and cutting a balancing act between nato and russia and other powers in the world. so there multiple r 8 days going to play is going to impact on demand least probably greater expense . and at any us enrollment in the way we are describing would be it would turn out to be a terrible mistake. well, if it's, you know, in closing here

and now he's could it be henry kissinger really? okay. it says these people are so out of their depth. let me go to a side because we're running out of time here. as on. i think the region for the most part. now what makes it different now is that they're not as afraid of the united states as they used to be. do you agree with that or that some of that? oh yes, definitely. because um, but with the emergence of multiple out of it, i mean you can see lots of countries changing data or traditional positions. but for the multiply to, we could have hardly seen it on and so did a b a and do called photo countries, basically normalizing data relations. but for multiple large games, we could hardly have seen catchy and cutting a balancing act between nato and russia and other powers in the world. so there multiple r 8 days going to play, he's going to impact on demand. least try great to expand and at any us involvement in the way we are describing would be it would turn out to be a terrible mistake. well, if it's, you know, in closing here, i th

nixon, israel benefit from this flood of arms in war. there was no doubt in my mind, no doubt in henry kissinger's mind, as to what we should do, israel had to be saved. one of israel's most brutal military commanders was called up after the arrival of american weapons. the man who knew the sini desert very well. ariel sharon. to go over the swiss canal, he decided to open a canal to the west coast of the sues canal between the two divisions guarding it. egyptians did not take care of the area near lake almora due to the greater width of the lake than other parts of the canal and there was a distance of about mile between the watchfuls in the north. and south of canal, the israelis could have manated the egyptians by crossing this route from behind, but something was wrong. sharon did not think about the talent of the egyptian forces stationed near lake almora. the israeli forces em call at none, but most clashed with the egyptians because the egyptians near the lake were more powerful than what sharon had imagined, so only few of them were able to cross the canal. a year before, when the israelis

the authors sent me this article, and there are two very interesting authors, henry kissinger. known as a big supporter of developing relations with russia over the years. and maintaining the arms control regime. and they don't propose in their article to do nothing against russia, there is no such thing there, but they propose to create, if you like, a condominium of the united states and china, if not for the development of artificial intelligence, then at least for the development of measures that will not allow artificial intelligence to develop artificial intelligence, get out of control. allow individual countries or even individual groups to deal a big blow to anyone and here they make, from my point of view, one very important statement that when we were talking about the damn weapons, then in general they were developed by states, but with artificial intelligence, the danger is that... individual large companies can also develop, and naturally, it is very difficult to create rules here, to control this, i may be wrong, dmitry, because i am not at all an expert in this

apart from the zionists , the nobel went to their american comrades, such as henry kissinger, the former us secretary of state, when more than 3 million vietnamese were killed during his ministry. just search for this name online . aung san suu kyi, the former ruler of myanmar. he was the cause of the killing of thousands of rohingya muslims and the displacement of tens of thousands of them. mahatma ghani was also nominated five times. every time his record was checked , he was rejected. he was the leader of the indian revolution against british colonialism. mohammad javad reza soltani khabarari radio they are preparing for a meeting of students, each of whom is from a region of iran , from azarbaijan province, a city from mashsheb, urmia province, chaharmahal bakhtiari province , arsan province, juba. as a kind of head of the faculty, i am probably paying attention to this university, the expectation that comes from the faculty, because the most important element of any organization is its human resources, and a special view should be given to the university of forensic sciences, defini

at that time, henry kissinger said: our dollar is your problem.hus, the americans captured the whole world. the best way to take over a country, especially a developing one, is to give them a loan from the imf, which they will not be able to return, then it turns out that the country's government will be completely... in 1965 , french president schaarl officially proposed to the american president to exchange 15 billion dollars accumulated in france's state reserves of gold according to the official backing of the overseas currency. official washington responded by saying that this action would be regarded as unfriendly and would have consequences, but the french president ignored this. and soon, the first ship, whose holds were filled with american banknotes, set sail. the first tranche of the exchange was us$850 million. the americans, gritting their teeth , were forced to exchange dollars for gold at the stated rate of 1.1 golots for 1 dollar. meanwhile, a second one arrived on the shores of the states french steam, and then a third. and by the

at that time henry kissinger said: our dollar is your problem, so the americans have taken the wholeorld captive, the best way to take over a country, especially... a developing one, is to give them an imf loan that they cannot return, then it turns out that the country's government will completely tied to the interests of america, in 1965, french president charles degaulle officially invited the american president to exchange 1.5 billion dollars accumulated in the french state reserve for gold, according to the official provision of the overseas currencies. official washington responded by saying that this action would be regarded as unfriendly and would have consequences, but the french president ignored this. and soon the first ship, whose holds were filled with american banknotes, set sail. the first tranche of the exchange was us$850 million. the americans, gritting their teeth , were forced to exchange dollars for gold at the stated rate of 1.1 grams of gold for 1 dollar. meanwhile, to the shores. states, the second french steamer arrived, and then the third, by the end of the

eight years later henry kissinger calls it a grave mistake. same in america.emocrats welcomed the open border, now just three years later the extent of biden's grave mistake is becoming clear. america's been changed forever, and we had no say in it. third hour of "varney" starts now. ♪ ♪ stuart: jimmy failla is here. jimmy, has biden changed america forever? >> hopefully not forever, but for the time being, he absolutely has. this is what people mistake about mass migration. yes, we are a country that was built on immigration, but the people coming here wanted to be american. they wanted to buy into our way of live, okay, and they were proud to have a piece of that grand bargain. what we're seeing now is not a melting pot. we're now a country that's a smoking pot. and half of the people coming here are just complaining the whole time. and what you realize when it comes to the border is there's a real dereliction of duty. what we've tried to characterize as compassion, people want to come hear and build a better life, is fine. okay? but if we don't have the abi

, drops everything and flies to moscow for negotiations, i’ll just note that henry kissinger was, ityko, with panomariov, with dobrynin, on the question of how to end this crisis for one fairly clear reason: israel, well , here’s my point of view, as with the police, israel is a sprinter, it is excellent at running short distances in such crises. kissinger managed to understand the obvious thing that if that crisis of the 7th year dragged on, then the prospect will not be the best, not the brightest for the state of israel, now in washington there is no one person who would understand where this crisis is developing, it is quite difficult to imagine that anthony blinken will leave and fly somewhere, well, if exactly, yes, if exactly from october 11 to 16 he flew, but it happened, this is the greatest shame in the history of american diplomacy, we are talking about the fact that blinken was forced to wait half a day for a reception in saudi arabia, if anyone wants to get a visual confirmation of the fall of the american diplomacy, look, 4 minutes, the open part of the communication wi

the names of henry kissinger, anwar sadad, and gorbachev are among them. the names that indicate, to receive the nobel peace prize, speak volumes peaceful goals are not important and bellicose. can also reach it. now cyberspace users, criticizing political awards in some countries , have heated the nobel prize with the hashtag of the zionist prize to say that for the nobel, neither ingenuity nor peaceful goals are necessary, you just need to win the hearts of the zionists. the first principle of human rights is its inseparability, and both of its parts, i.e. economic, social and cultural rights, and civil and political rights , must be implemented together, that is, one cannot support sanctions and at the same time be a human rights activist, a human rights activist means opposing the boycott of fatima. sharifi khabarari radio good morning, dear and respected compatriots, we have arrived at the department to investigate the climate of the country, with the presence of an expert from the meteorological organization , mrs. ahmadi is with us today. mrs. ahmad

former us secretary of state henry kissinger, who was a staunch supporter of the policies of the zionist regime, played an irreplaceable role in the massacre of the people of vietnam and the planning and implementation of the coup in chile, which led to the deaths of tens of thousands of people. there was a denial and he received this award. jimmy carter, the former president of the united states, who ordered the massacre of the people of iran during the islamic revolution, to mohammad rezaza shah pahlavi, also won the nobel peace prize in 2022. yasser arafat fought against the zionist regime until then. kurds were presented as terrorists, but after signing a compromise agreement and sacrificing the rights of the palestinian people , he received the nobel peace prize in 1994. the president of egypt, anwar sadad , was introduced as a warmonger until he fought alongside gamal abdel nasser with the zionist regime, but then since the signing of the camp david agreement, he was called a man of peace and received the nobel peace prize in the same year. sang suu kyi, who won the nobel peace pri

henry. kissinger, kissinger has a very key sentence, he says that the armies if they don't win, they are losers, but the guerrillas are winners if they don't lose. see, you have a classic army on one side, on the other hand, an army that has been involved in hand-to-hand operations before this war, the operations that were in the guerilla area, guerrilla warfare and commando warfare, now enter and enter. these forces have a special meaning that they are telling us about some of these new dimensions of this morning's attack. in any case, for the first time i think that it is the resistance that is launching a large-scale operation in the occupied territories of palestine. analysts say that similar to this happened 50 years ago when the army arabic, syrian and egyptian together caught the zionists by surprise, gaza has been under siege for 17 years, 2 million people are under the most severe sanctions there, in the densest part of the earth today, what new leaves have these people turned in front of the sahleh regime, now like me now i have been at your service since morning. let me quickly revie

henry kissinger , former us secretary of state, who was a staunch supporter of the policies of the zionistime. in the massacre of the people of vietnam and the planning and implementation of the coup in shiri, which led to the death of tens of thousands of people , he had an undeniable role, and jimmy carter won this award. the former us president who ordered the massacre of the iranian people during the islamic revolution to mohammad rezaza shah pahlavi also won the nobel peace prize in 2022. yasser arafat was known as a terrorist until he fought against the zionist regime, but after signing the compromise agreement and sacrificing the rights of the palestinian people , he received the nobel peace prize in 1994. the president of egypt, anwar sadad , was presented as a warmonger until he fought alongside gamal abdel nasser with the zionist regime, but after the signing of the camp david agreement, he was called a man of peace. and in 1978 he received the nobel peace prize. sang suu kyi, who won the nobel peace prize, is one of the causes of war crimes against the rohingya muslims, a crime

offer, there is also no great mystery here, most likely these are proposals in the spirit of henry kissinger, who was at one time an outwardly...' political adviser to trump, but more importantly, he was an adviser to nixon, and it was during the nixon presidency that the collapse of the structure that the united states states opposed the soviet union in asia. it's just that at some point, nixon and kissinger decided that it's easier and more profitable, they say, to get involved with china and reach a certain compromise with it, than to oppose all this soviet stuff. a huge number of seato organizations, serious support collapsed and troops were withdrawn from vietnam , yes, that is, trump's plans in this sense are what is called america first, yes , of course, yes, mr. yaroslav, first of all, of course, these interests of the united states states, yes, well in fact, mr. yaroslav, we are limited in time, unfortunately, thank you for trying to explain, we see, verbatim, how the same kissinger changed his position on ukraine's membership in nato, let's hope that. i am also a western politician

henry kissinger, and it was actually quite surprising, because he had previously consistently opposed, in general, not even increasing military support, well, against any ambitions of ukraine regarding joining nato, because he even said that after victory, ukraine can become so strong that it will threaten europe, well, in general, if such mastodons, let's say so, are so deep, that the eaters who were against it before, already agree, that there is no alternative to ukraine in nato, he said so, they say, there is no sense in... blockade of ukraine , what do you think this is a symptom of? i think this is a very important symptom and a very important trend, and you are right about this episode. in fact, kissinger changed his position not now, he began to change it during the current great war of ukraine against the russian russian invasion. at first, he really was a categorical opponent of ukraine joining nato, he also visited russia often, but it was the war, the heroic resistance of ukraine, then the effective ukrainian army, and the situation itself, development. situation, kissinge

usa, henry kissinger.ext was agreed upon un council resolution, which demanded an end to the war. for their part, arab countries imposed an embargo on oil supplies to those states that supported israel. ultimately, this led to the largest oil crisis of 1973 and caused a long recession in the world economy. and 6 years later, israel signed a peace agreement with egypt. the middle east, created in the 20th century by external powers, under the influence of the collapse of empires, the holocaust, decolonization and the cold war , is becoming a thing of the past while all ponertians live with the old diagrams, but only because no one can imagine anything else, but they will have to. the conflict in palestine has been sparking with passions since time immemorial. the current explosion of hatred, despair, anger is reaching epic intensity. we invited our dear guest, leonid rudolfovich syukyanin, the best domestic specialist in islamic law, to discuss some of its aspects. leon rudovolfovich, hello, i greet you , s

then the term shuttle diplomacy appeared, us secretary of state henry kissinger rushed on a plane between the capitals of israel, syria and egypt and persuaded the leaders of the countries to reconcile. israel lost. in other countries, but left under his occupation jerusalem, the west bank of the jordan river and the gaza strip, and kissinger will have to hear freedom for palestine more than once in his speeches. the big powers have turned the region into another testing ground for the cold war. the united states will never forget that the antagonism between freedom and its enemies is our reality, and the united states will not be neutral in this struggle. parties including in syria and egypt. in any case , the ideas of socialism began to take hold of the arab masses, as they said then, the americans saw in this a certain danger for their politics and its presence in the middle east. since then, israel has been the main ally of the united states in the region. now america has already sent its aircraft carriers to the shores of the country. and once upon a time, during the israeli-lebanese

know, when you discuss the world agenda, you remember the words of the wise american politician, henry kissingerabout world development, kissinger said that the worst thing in the world to be an enemy of america, but it’s even a little worse to be its friend, now in fact , no matter how anyone might think , it’s really not easy for the so-called friends of america in the long run, given that the united states always acts purely based on its own selfish interests, those people who they put forward in the first positions, they actively use and often their fate is not enviable , well, in fact, if you look at the development of the conflict in the middle east, it is obvious that even after biden’s trip to israel , netanyahu and his right-wing, actually nationalist regime. on the one hand, obviously, israeli public opinion is more heated by the need to conduct an open military operation directly entirely in the gaza strip, on the other hand, it is obvious that the consequences of this operation, including for the israeli armed forces, and for israeli citizens around the world, will be very. i do not

then in 1973, when this crisis happened, where did the oil column of the soviet union come from, henry kissinger in his h in his shuttle diplomacy negotiates with the soviet, with the soviet union and soviet oil released to foreign markets, it would be 73-74, but then it settles this conflict, king faisal in 75, was killed on air when he was receiving a kuwaiti delegation by his immediate nephew, relatives, the faisals, binusid al saud, and already his successor, king khalid, he really smooths out all these issues, renews relations with the united states, all the oil of the arabian gulf is released again. markets and this energy crisis fades, already in 1977-1979 anwar saddat turned away from the soviet union, well, a little earlier, i think, somewhere in 75, and looks completely westward , has certain agreements and relations with the united states, and goes to those famous kemdevit agreements of 79, when menachem begin, the prime minister of israel, anwar saddad and the mediator... jimmy carter signs the kemdewicki agreements, according to which egypt is the first arab state to recognize israe

cairo the council of ministers of the ussr alexey kosygin, and moscow the us secretary of state, henry kissingert the text was agreed upon. un council resolution, which demanded an end to the war. for their part, arab countries imposed an embargo on oil supplies to those states that supported israel. this ultimately led to the biggest oil crisis of '73 and caused a long recession in the world economy. and 6 years later, israel signed a peace agreement with egypt. the middle east has been created. century by external powers, under the influence of the collapse of empires, holocaust, decolonization and the cold war are becoming a thing of the past, while all the ponertians live with the old schemes, but only because no one can imagine anything else, but they will have to. the conflict in palestine has sparkled with passions from time immemorial, the current explosion of hatred, despair, anger is reaching the epic level to discuss some of its aspects, we have invited our dear guest, leonid rudolfovich syukiyanin, the best domestic specialist in islamic law, nech, hello, i greet you, some things are

that they were gouged again, then the term shuttle diplomacy appeared, us secretary of state henry kissingerlane between the capitals of israel, syria and egypt, and persuaded the leaders of the countries to reconcile. israel lost conquest in other countries, but left under his occupation. jerusalem, the west bank of the jordan river and the gaza strip, and kissinger will have to hear freedom for palestine more than once in his speeches. the big powers have turned the region into another testing ground for the cold war. the united states will never forget that the antagonism between freedom and its enemies is ours.

is very much feared in the western world, the defragmentation of russia, we have a quote from henry kissingere of the united states of america, let's see, the disintegration of russia or its destruction. its ability to conduct strategic policy can transform its territory, which covers 11 time zones is a controversial vacuum. all of these dangers will be exacerbated by the presence of thousands of nuclear weapons. well, at such moments , i remember the speech of george bush the elder, the one that went down in history as a chikin, when he came to kyiv before the declaration of our independence, he convinced kyiv not to do this precisely because of nuclear weapons. the collapse of the ussr was actually bloodless, but why, having such an example, western politicians are not preparing for the peaceful disintegration of that moscow, by the way, first of all, you said correctly, almost immodestly, because even then wars were going on in abkhazia, karabakh, transnistria went to tajikistan, so we, just muscovites, at that time from the territory of the core of the zr, seemed to have taken it, these c

prior to her current position, she was the senior vice president henry kissinger chair and director of international security at csis. at least her current title is a little shorter than that. she was sworn in as the 35th deputy secretary of defense in 2021. i think it is interesting that the title of her dissertation at m.i.t. was change agents. who leads and why in the execution of national security policy? given the swirl of strategic and technological change all around us, i would say a change agent is exactly what our times call for. we are fortunate to have dr. hicks lead off our conference and after her remarks, she has graciously agreed to submit to a rigorous cross-examination by yours truly. please join me in welcoming the deputy secretary of defense, dr. kathleen hicks . dr. hicks: good morning and thank you for the kind introduction. thank you for the invitation. to both of you, thank you for your many years of service and leadership and support for the defense department. before i go on, i want to acknowledge the tragic accident in darwin, australia and express my condolen

and albert einstein, a more contemporary innovativey, figures of our age, like steve jobs, or henry kissinger, you can bet the result will be a fascinating, revealing comprehensive and vividly told book. walters take on elon musk is certainly all that. and the story turned out to be even more than walter oregon for when he set out a couple of years ago to do the biography. back then walter thought he would be writing mainly about mosque as a technological trailblazer, a leader in the fields of electric vehicles and private space exploration. then came his impulsive purchase of twitter and his central role in providing ukraine weremm satellitee communication links during the war with russia. and the questions and controversies about mosque only grew. all of whichnh is enhanced the timeliness and importance of walter's in-depth portrait of musk and of the demons that drive him. now, predictably, walter himself has come in for some criticism about what he decided to put in the book or leave out or the extent to which he refrains from judging musk. legitimate questions have been raised about both

henry kissinger talks about warfare. i think eventually there will be legal guardrails.t is hard to do because it is new but it will add a huge value. for j.p. morgan, if it replaces jobs, we hope to redeploy jobs. we offered to about 90% of people, they accepted. and we have told them that as some of the jobs are transitory, we hire 30,000 people a year. we expect to build get them a job local in a different branch or function. we will be doing that with any this location the takes place as a result of ai. emily: what is the weather now? >> i'm not giving a forecast. i blame myself. the u.s. has been very strong for a while. no surprise, $5 trillion was pumped in fiscally. $3 trillion or $4 trillion of q. week, and now it is being reversed. the consumer is still spending money and they still have more than pre-covid. home price gone for 15 years. talking about deterioration, credit is not deteriorating. it is not inflation-adjusted, gdp adjusted. we see it is normalizing. that is the here and now. all of the data is distorted because of covid and things like that. when

just prior to her current position, she was the senior vice president henry kissinger chair and director of security at csi us. she was sworn in on february 9th, 2021. i think it's interesting that the title of her dissertation at mit was, change agents. who leads ny, and the execution of national security policy. given the swirl of strategic and technological change all around us, i would say a change agent is exactly what our times call for. we are indeed fortunate to have dr. hicks leadoff our conference . after her remarks, she graciously agreed to submit to a rigorous cross-examination by yours truly. join me to welcome the deputy secretary of defense, dr. kathleen hicks. >> good morning, everyone. thank you, for the introduction. thank you to david for the invitation. to both of you, thank you for your many years of service in leadership and support for the defense department. before i go on, i want to acknowledge the tragic accident in australia. to express my condolences who lost loved ones but i want to convey my prayers for those marines who were injured, for their families, an

franklin or albert einstein or contemporary innovative figures of our age steve jobs or jennifer or henry kissingerou can bet the results will be at fascinating revealing comprehensive and vividly told book. walters take on elon musk is certainly all of that. the story turned out to be even more than walter bargained for when he set out a couple of years ago to do the biography. back then walter thought he'd be writing mainly about the technological trailblazer a leader in the field of electric vehicles and private space exploration. then came musk's impulsive purchase of twitter and his central role in providing you create with satellite communication during the war with russia. the questions and controversy about musk onlygr grew. all ofss which has enhanced the timelinessth and the importancef walters in-depth portrait of musk and of the demons that drive him. walter himself is coming for somebo criticism about what he decided to put in the book or leave out shipyard the extent to which he refrains from judging musk. legitimate questions have been raised about both the risks and advantages of ac

henry kissinger, i was just in a meeting with him, he could call four people and get that deal done. the president of egypt, assad in damascus, the king in aman, and golda meir. there is nobody here to do that. i contend that the military task here is more challenging as well. it's not tank on tank out in the desert. certainly there was an existential moment for israel when egypt achieve the early success. but once that was resolved, that was a straight forward military operation. this is much more than just an offensive operation, a clear hold and build. >> absolutely. >> you have to have what's going to follow. >> absolutely. retired general david petraeus, maybe they should call you. you'd be good to helm this. >> thank you, jake. >> the book is "conflict: the evolution of warfare from 1945 to ukraine." please check it out. coming up, cnn is live on the ground in the sound of sderot. it's essentially become a ghost town since the hamas attacks. what the residents who decided to say there are saying. stay with us. the power goes out and we still have wifi to do our homework. and th

a supply surprise attack on israel he made or in order to make peace and straight afterwards henry kissinger was able to launch the peace negotiations because there was an error partner, the leader of egypt that was capable and intent upon making peace. here we have hamas, which is intent on destroying israel and the palestinian authority which has no legitimacy, before this crisis erupted, and certainly now, will have no legitimacy if it holds out an olive branch to israel. the circumstances are very different and much more difficult to see how a political process can come out of that. having said that, israel doesn't have a solution other than to try to resort to talks which obviously broke down. that will require israel to go and on the ground in gaza and you've already been discussing the consequences of that. once israel gets into gaza, the question is, who did they get out in favor of? who will take control of gaza, if they destroy hamas there, if they can. and that is an impossible situation, they can't make peace with hamas, but you have a situation here, which is not ripe for any po

it that resounds so much, show that video of secretary blinken, he could've been 50 years ago henry kissingerot of things wrong to historians like me. that week they kept yarmulke poor war, they protected israel from a serious danger of being extinguished. they kept me -- from coming in they kept us from becoming a world war. that is one american presidents do with history. if you look at what joe biden has done this week, this is the president who understands that historical resonance, has the motive in the experience to do just. that we will watch, we hope it happens. >> do you think this situation is worse than the one we faced for two years ago, when it was richard nixon and henry kissinger. what -- president biden represents today? >> i do. i wish i could say otherwise. 50 years ago as dangerous as this was, the big danger was the soviets might come in, nixon had a very good relationship with -- and there was the ability to communicate to make sure that that did not happen and there was no equal of the soviets were dealing not only russians who were a lesser version of what they were in

henry kissinger talked about warfare. i think eventually there will be legal guardrails around it.t is new, but it will add a huge value. for jp morgan, if it replaces jobs, we hope to redeploy people. like at first republic, we offered jobs to 90% of people. they accepted, but we also told them as some of those jobs are transitory, but we hired 30,000 people a year, so we expect to be able to get them a job somewhere local in a different branch or different function if we can do that. we will be doing that with any dislocation that takes place as a result of ai. >> the biggest 10 companies prop up a huge chunk of the s&p. his big tech too big to fail? >> i think that is too broad of a question. in any industry, when you say too big to fail, which i lost touch with what that means anymore because car company's were bailed out and i don't understand. they should ask what they want. if the regulators don't want a bank to ever fail again, we should do a, b, c, d, and e. i think dodd-frank accomplished the goals, which was to dramatically reduce the risk. big tech, you have to be very

middle east have come out and condemned what hamas has done here, and the danger as secretary henry kissingertoday that this is a danger to the world order, because what hamas has tried to do here is to end any normalization of relations with israel and the middle eastern powers, and the result that we're seeing in the street with these celebrations is to put pressure on the leaders from yemen to bahrain to saudi and so far we are nong a leaders of those countries to stand with israel, the opposite, we have not seen the condemnation of hamas by these leaders, and the longer this war goes on, the great fear in washington today is the longer this war goes on and the more dancing in the arab streets there are, the worse it is not only for israel but for the united states and for the international world order and secretary kissinger and i have known each other a half a century, not always agreed, but his comments today deserve great attention. >> these are really important questions that you're raising and concerns that you're raising and we'll continue to follow them. carl, always great to have

american, second i'm secretary of state, and third i am a jew. 50 years after the senate confirmed henry kissinger as the first jewish secretary of state, secretary of state anthony blinken said this today in israel. >> i come before you, not only as the united states secretary of state, but also as a jew. my grandfather, maurice blinken, fled programs in russia. my stepfather, samuel p's are, survive concentration camps, auschwitz, that how, -- so prime minister, i understand, on a personal level, the harrowing echoes that hamas's massacres carry for israeli jews, indeed, for jews everywhere. i also come before you as a husband and father of young children. it's impossible for me to look at the photos of families killed such as the mother, father, and three small children murdered as they sheltered in their home in a kibbutz near oz and not think of my own children. this is just one of hamas's countless acts of terror in a litany of brutality and inhumanity that, yes, brings to mind the worst of isis. babies slaughtered. bodies desecrated. young people burned alive, women raped, parents executed

goes to larger point, you saw henry kissinger, he admitted toward end of his life, maybe we shouldn't have let all these people into the united states. there were people 75 years ago telling you there was a mistake, we have millions, at least tens of thousands who have that murderous mentality toward christians. >> harris: you think the number is that high? >> jake: absolutely, and they are waiting for a lever in election year, we'll see that violence in our streets. >> harris: what on the battle field would inform you how many could be here? is that sort of transport to the united states, was that travel something you hear talked about among our enemies? >> jake: absolutely, i was in iraq and my friends encountered middle eastern terrorists at the border, they are here, just a matter of how many. >> harris: go back to capitol hill, house republicans just decided their candidate for speaker. republicans have chosen minnesota congressman and house majority whip tom emmer as their third speaker designate since kevin mccarthy historic vacating the seat and he'll now tom emmer, will now h