people hold moral opinions on the subject. morality is a really tough one to ask people to compromise on. if you believe a woman has a right to control her reproductive process then you don't want to give that up. on the other hand, if you believe in embryo and fetus is a human being, then, you will take the position that abortion is murder. it's very hard to find a compromise on those moral positions. the one thing i suppose that could come out of this is that there might be medications and procedures that will allow abortion to take place very early in a pregnancy, to the.where, a lot of people in the country are willing to consider a gray area early in the pregnancy. if you get toward the end of the pregnancy becomes much more morally fraught. moral issues are the hardest to compromise. host: do you think our founding fathers that you write about would be surprised that we can't compromise on moral issues? >> they would be aware that moral issues are difficult to compromise on. however, one thing that motivated henry clay w

globalisation lost its moral compass and maybe we have to put more values into the system my personal opinion is we have to strengthen the national multilateral institutions now we're living in a dog eat dog world it's like a room loose loose game having always you know action and come to action so we need to put back to the system and we need stronger leadership and better leadership well it's interesting to me that you mentioned the these moral issue because there are there are lots of moralizing about trans economic slogans but again america first making america great again and that's all dismissed as populism but don't they deserve a substantial serious discussion about. how globalization has essentially been able to free the while for. any national affiliation and any social responsibility that comes with it don't you find it striking that globalization is now being discussed in moral terms rather than a canonic terms i agree i think we need a new syria when you go to the business schools we should go to mit and harvard out and stand for what you're learning about serious of the

forget about the moral leadership.hat's not what we're about anymore. >> that's ridiculous. >> and that's because of trump. >> i'm sorry. is there a question lurking in there or are you pontificating? you invited me on to answer questions. >> well, that would be a blessing. >> i'll tell you -- but, look, christopher, you don't want to cover the issues. you don't want to cover the economy. >> you want to dump what is obviously in front of your face. the head of your party said we're not looking for moral leadership in our leaders. this is the era of trump. >> that is not what she said. she was answering a specific question. i watched the san bernardientir. i am really proud. >> she was honest. >> she invested more in the ground game and technology. >> good. >> she is aligned with the types of voters, the 2001 wone who -- >> and she said if you want morality in leadership, go to church. >> she was answering a question. oh, where exactly should we go for morality and leadership? should we go to the field of the 2020 democ

issue because there are there are lots of moralizing about. economic slogans but again america first making america great again and that's all dismissed as populism but don't they deserve a substantial serious discussion about. how globalization has essentially been able to free the while from any national affiliation and any social responsibility that comes with it don't you find it striking that globalization is now being discussed in moral terms rather than a canonical terms i agree i think we need a new syria when you go to the business. if you go to mit and harvard and stand for what you're learning about series of the past i think we have to adopt our economic models and if told of all of the moral compass behind globalization and we have to avoid the lose lose scenario with toward or store windows scenario us english should always look into dialogue where you can always harmonize our differing opinions for we can find compromise and it is end of the day having everybody winning from globalization so we need a neat new siri and we meet i

morally decent form of globalization does it mean that globalization as it stands right now is morally in decent. hosting give us a global meeting in cost price in portugal in early april is around eight hundred participants including four head of states and fifteen ministers and we'll debate the future of globalization and maybe providing a moral compass for it. globalisation lost its moral compass and maybe we have to put more values into the system my personal opinion is we have to strengthen my international multilateral institutions now we are living in a dog eat dog world it's like him loose loose game having always you know action and come to action so we need to put back to the system and we need stronger leadership and better leadership well it's interesting to me that you mentioned the these moral issue because there are there are lots of moralizing about trans economic slogans but again america first making america great again and that's all dismissed as populism but don't they deserve a substantial serious discussion about. how globalization has essentially been able to fre

it is a moral moment in america. people are feeling like the forces tearing us apart are stronger than those that bring us together. this is a moral moment in america. here cometh the dreamer. it is time for us to defend the dream. as langston hughes said, to save the dream for one, we must save the dream for all. it is time that we dare to dream again in america. the dream that we can be a country that every child has clean water and clean air, great public schools with professionals who are well-paid. it is time that we dream bigger dreams in america that health care is a right, that poverty is a wrong, and where the days of our children dying from gun violence are long gone. we have got to dream bigger dreams again in america where we don't lead the world in incarceration, but in job creation and higher education. we must dream bigger dreams again in america that we can banish bigotry and heal hate. and that we will elect leaders that know the only way to unite people. that is what it takes to make america great.

i think i would say is the equality is primarily a moral idea, it's a moral adjective that we all believe in and the idea of course of equality is that people as a moral matter are to be treated the same as much as possible. we've got lots of places in the law and the political tax where we say exactly that. and very strong vibrant language and most of the time when we think about doing the work of equality we think of it in those terms. of trying to pursue the absolute moral truths the best we can. but it turns out that we have a hard time doing the work of equality and practice. that we run into a number of roadblocks and we sometimes worry about the consequences of embracing someone's claim of equality whether someone's claim to enjoy -- if you're in a same-sex couple or whether allowing that couple to enjoy the fruits of marriage and some of that might change your notion of marriage and you might worry about a political backlash and something that some institutions and elected officials worry about. so for a lot of these practical reasons we often in reality resist embracing the moral

moral cannot indulge in amnesia. in this day and age, forget that you honor history not just by reflecting or reciting it. you honor history by emulate in it, letting it challenge you and demand from you that you show the lessons you have learned. we come together to honor the sacrifices today. but we also know that the only way we can honor the work done before us is recommitting ourselves to it. i tell you what. , peoplelenges we face want to make it just about the people in the highest offices of the land, people who traffic in hatred who cannot even condemn nazis or white supremacists. people want to point fingers and forget the lesson of king that what we must repent for is not just the words and actions of the bad people but the appalling silence and inaction of the good people. said that it is violence, the violence of indifference and inaction is what threatens our country. we have become a nation that is too adjusted to injustice, too content with the suffering of our neighbors, a nation too divided against

the question is -- this is a moral principle. [scattered applause] elan: i would go for their than further than that. i will put all my cards on the table. i am not a fan of the u.n., their so-called customary laws of war, and regarding the morality extension of conduct of war and have a standards of what they do in the battle field, but i haven't wrote problem with the standards that they pose because they disadvantage those who obey them and empower those who disobey them. there is clearly a problem with that. the idea that we treat u.n. bodies or international wall essentially like a papal pronouncement that it is isentially unquestionable, think is a mistake there you can make the argument that palestinians are trying to resist occupation, and i am sure they hate being under occupation, while being told it is israel's fault. the question is -- what is life occupation? i am sure no one in this room would choose to live under occupation, but did you know -- and this is relevant, i am sure it has them up in your reading of it --

this time the moral responsibility of presidential candidates. ty of presidential candidates ♪ baby i'm not even in a gown ♪ and the only thing u have to say is wow ♪ ♪ make you're jaw drop drop say oh my drop drop drop ♪ ♪ make u say oh my god my drop drop ♪ ♪ make you're jaw drop make u say oh my god ♪ ♪ and you never felt this type of emotion ♪ ♪ make you're jaw drop drop say oh my drop drop drop ♪ ♪ make u say oh my god my drop drop ♪ ♪ make you're jaw drop make u say oh my god ♪ ♪ mmm, exactly!ug liberty mutual customizes your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. nice! but uh, what's up with your partner? oh! we just spend all day telling everyone how we customize car insurance because no two people are alike, so... limu gets a little confused when he sees another bird that looks exactly like him. ya... he'll figure it out. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ plants capture co2. what if other kinds of plants captured it too? if these industrial plants had technology that captured carbon like trees

candidates for president have a moral obligation to release their tax returns.end $1.7 trillion to the internal revenue service and the united states treasury to put them in charge of the united states treasury. presidential candidates are asking american voters to put them in charge of administering all of the spending of that money that congress authorizes. presidential candidates are asking for the power to sign or veto new tax laws. every member of congress is empowered to write tax law. and so they have a moral responsibility to show us how the tax law affects them and how changes in the tax law might affect them. that's why democrats in congress are advancing legislation to require presidential candidates to release their last ten years of tax returns. democrats are trying to make an unwritten rule of presidential campaigning a written rule. senator elizabeth warren already released ten years of tax returns before the democrats proposed that legislation this year and today, senator gillibrand became the first presidential candidate to release this year's t

indulge in a moral amnesia. and in this day and age, forget that we honor history, not by just reciting it, you honor history by emulating and letting it challenge you and demand from you that you show the lessons you have learned. to honor theher sacrifices today, but we also know the only way we can honor the work that was done before us is recommitting ourselves to it, and i will tell you what, the challenge we face, people want to make it just about the people behind the offices of the land, people who traffic in hatred, people and offices who cannot even condemn white supremacists. people want to point fingers and forget the lesson of king, that what we must repent for is not just the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people. that it isdy said violence, the violent of indifference and inaction is what threatens our country. we have become a nation that is , toadjusted to injustice contend the suffering of our death neighbors, a nation that is divided against ourselves, or people have common

i agree that this hinges on a moral interpretation, but a moral interpretation again will make one wonder why there are no civil and political rights in no palestinian state sovereignty. the ponent also says palestinian movement is an obstacle to peace but what about israeli obstacles? just a vague notion of israel is not perfect from my opponent there is no list to israeli obstacles to peace are. why is there nothing about this? would argue the silence on this issue is more telling than anything my opponent says. i think it's a fallacy that the movement is dedicated to the destruction of israel. in 1993, actually before then, plo did accept the right of israel to exist. did accept the two-state solution. hamas, while it didn't change its full original document has made it clear that it's willing to accept a two-state solution from its highest leadership levels, and it will accept the long term truce. is, truth of the matter israel never made steps towards the final settlement, that the oslo was supposed to create. if the palestinian movement is o harmful to palestinians, why did they vot

as i suggested, no figure better symbolized moral conviction in wartime that abraham lincoln. not to worry. i am not going to convince you abraham lincoln shows up in casablanca. i know that he does not. his spirit is there. nothing illustrates this so clearly as the moment when rick's competitor asks if the cafe american and sam are for sale. respond? ick in the language of abraham lincoln, i don't buy or sell human beings. this line, perhaps more than any other reveals the ethical underpinning that signals rick's transformation, his willingness to take a moral stand. i think it is no accident that he uses the same kind of anti-slavery language being used by the office of war information and robert sherwood. it is very likely that the author of humphrey bogart's anti-slavery pronouncement was koch, a casablanca screenwriter. even though lincoln himself does not flash ritualistically across embodiesn, casablanca the moral urgency that was being used to get americans behind this new effort. this lincoln was once again, or at least in spirit, being .eimagined and reinterpreted i

>> jimmy: natalie morales. this is your first talk show ever?y. >> jimmy: yeah. >> all the time. >> jimmy: on the "today" show -- >> even the "today" show -- >> jimmy: "access hollywood" -- >> yes, even the "today" show tweets me as their own natalie morales all the time. [ light laughter ] >> jimmy: they get it wrong? >> last week! last week. yes. >> jimmy: you're joking. >> no, i'm not. i'm dead serious. it happens all the time. >> jimmy: have you ever met each other? we love natalie. >> we did. we did. she's great. i was actually -- i was promoting "battle of the sexes", a movie i did a couple years ago. and i sitting in my hotel room getting ready and i looked out s two it's kind of like on "friends"m like, joey's hand twin. what do you do with that? [ laughter ] we just have the same name and it's like -- what? there's nothing we can do. we're just like "hey, cool! hi." >> jimmy: that's true. >> we're both usually annoyed by what happens. >> jimmy: oh, good. i want to see you guys together. >> yeah, i get her baby gifts, sometimes she gets

difference and moral inequality between israel and the palestinian movement. israel stands out as a basically free society, one with many flaws and moral failings. yet, it has freedom of speech. it has religious freedom, intellectual freedom, and all citizens regardless of race or creed have the right to vote and be a part of the government. their will be objections to israel's moral standings, and i anticipate some of them here that it is an , ethnic national state and an apartheid state. i oppose the ethnic national element of israel. i regard israel as a combination of individualist elements, which are good, and that leads it to protect individual rights. and national and ethic religious elements which i regard as a problem and source of its failings. we can talk about the apartheid claim, which deserves more attention, and i invite you to ask me about that. i want to make the case why the main barrier to moving forward to peace is the palestinian movement. to the extent that the current approach is being tried, the two-state solution, it has led to empower

it is a two-part moral obligation. first, the attacks on september 11 were not just attacks on new york or in washington, d.c. they were atabs on america. the last few weeks we have heard an objection raised to this bill that new york should handle this issue because it's a, quote, new york problem. the world trade center stood in my district, many of the people who ran into those towers were my fellow new yorkers. the people who fled their homes and offices to find safety were my constituents. but they were americans. those towers fell not because they stood in new york but because they stood in the united states of america. . while it may have been the brave men and women of the new york police department and port authority who first rushed to those towers, to say that the survivors who are sick today are just new yorkers is untrue. there are sick responders and survivors in every state and 434 of the 435 congressional districts. this is not a new york or a d.c. issue, it is a national issue. and devs a national resp

there is a moral, clear moral vision. >> thank you. >> thank you to the panel for an excellent panel. question for greg and anyone else who wants to comment. wonder if you would comment on two things they feel are quite significant. one is the fact that for the first time in 175 years we have a pacific power that can tell us, manifest destiny is not going to determine what happens in the western pacific. so, china says where you are as big of an economy is you, and we do not play by your rules. the fact that with climate change you have a problem that doesn't really have a national enemy or national other to rally around. >> is the second one is just a statement? >> i just want to know what you think the significances. for your thesis in terms of domestic, how we react domestically to that what we do with that? >> it's a good question about climate change. climate changes in just a difference of opinion, there's been a power structure that's been manipulating and creating comments and i'll, linked to corporate structure linked to an ideological apparatus that has been pushing a worldv

lincoln's moral composition. boasted that he did lincoln a service by scaring off would be office seekers, who, fearing to see their names published in newspapers, abandoned plans to visit the illinois capital in order to badger the president-elect. 1860, althoughr your correspondent has no desire to claim any undue importance, he flatters himself that he is rendering preeminent services to the president elect. chronicless faithful of whatever transpires in this region has saved many an hour of annoyance and perplexity to the president-elect. it is solely owing indeed to the vigilance with which he watches and the mercilessness achieved thats office seekers abraham has not suffered any overwhelming attacks from his supporters. no mere sufficient means of keeping the eager folks at a safe distance could have been adopted than that which is now exercised to the president's benefit. the regular advertising of all political characters that venture hither in service shove residential favor is a most powerful scourge.

when that stops happening, i am not making a moral, i tend to moralize and i'm embarrassed fight and sorry that i am not making a moral case but a practical case, it is practical, venezuela will happen, it happened not very far away, only one time zone away. it is a big country and it was destroyed. no one has thought why. a main reason why, it did not have to happen, i went there as a kid and it was a nice country, caracas look like san diego with a big middle-class and oil reserves and an educated abolition. they are all in my -- educated population. they are all in miami now. the middle of the country, including members of the middle class, decided that it was not working for them, a small group are running things. they were mad about income inequality. thing so they hired a guide to destroy the ruling class and now they do not have toilet paper and are eating zoo animals. that is something we should pay attention to. everyone in washington says trump is an orange anomaly who will exit somewhere and we will get back to bob dole, and that will not happen at all. [laughter] tucker:

. >> i think deserve is the wrong word but it is a moral question somebody has to ask a moral question that if you were in the situation and in a place where our policies have destabilized to make it dangerous to you have a moral responsibility in a christian nation quick. >> wet paul is a long policies are we destabilizing i hate when people try to make america look terrible we are the most generous country in the world and helping countries around the world so for you just to say this without policies are destabilizing in latin america is outrageous. >> i could build a list is just a moral question either you think we have a responsibility morally or we don't. >> how long have you been working jonathan quick. >> without saying how old i am? [laughter] . >> as you get older more of your economy will be taken from you and some people work actually six months before they get there paycheck that is a moral issue as far as i am concerned for the middle americans who work hard and respect our laws from those who come here illegally. you agree? good. thank you. when the president says he wa

ratification of the constitution, it was not unusual for northerners and southerners to talk about the morality of slavery. before the 1830's or so, there were relatively few white americans who believed enslaved people ought to be immediately freed. there were many who felt white people and black people would both be better off if slavery gradually ended and if the two races sort of pursued their destinies separately. in 1817, you start to see the manifestation of this idea in a movement. a group of prominent ministers and politicians, people who wanted to end slavery, separated the races, they founded an organization called the american colonization society. their idea was to take free black people living in the u.s. and resettle them in west africa. the society would encourage slaveholders to emancipate their slaves. those people would then also be sent to africa, along with black missionaries, who would bring christianity to africans. this is a really popular idea in its early years, colonization. it is particularly popular among white people. it is so popular, in 1822, congress actually ap

holders did not believe that the bible sanctioned slavery, they're going to have a pretty serious moral and psychiatric logical dilemma on their hands. so leading ministers from every major denomination came to interpretations of the bible in a way that flatly contribute the interpretations of abolitionists. they point to petr, a in the old testament, all of whom were slave holders. they noted that the laws of ancient israel protected slavery. looking to the new testament, they pointed out that jesus had lived in a slave society. never criticized slavery. they noted how the apostle paul had urged a runaway slave to hurry -- return to his owner. southern clergy even found a strip churl origin for the enslavement of black people in particular and here they looked to the book of genesis and they argued that africans were descendants of noah's son, ma'am -- ham. and if you remember the story of noah and the ark and what happens afterward, noah had cursed the children of ham, declaring them destined to be servants. this is what is referred to as he metic f ham, the myth. the way that souther

what has happened and of course we have to be sensitive about this idea although we recognise the moralorce of what the needs —— new zealand prime minister was saying. the cyclone which has devastated parts of africa hit the headlines to the untrained eye this is a disaster of major proportions. however, that appointing and by the task invented disaster is nothing to that's getting to brexit and or if such a disaster was to happen in america. i would suggest that whoever does this editorial content or makes a decision on who gets top billing, it really has lost their moral and editorial compass. thank you for all your comments this week, we do want you to get in touch with your opinions on bbc news and current affairs. maybe even appear on the programme. that's all from us. i will be back after easter. goodbye. hello, welcome to a weekend which is going to deliver some dry weather though there will be blustery showers, particularly in scotland and it is going to feel cooler than it has done recently. we've seen this weather front move on southwards, coolerfresh air moving on behind, but

hello and welcome to worlds apart as the syrian war winds down so does the moral grandstanding around its conduct having spun bill last eight years denouncing serious treatment of the rabble and their families many western powers are now eager to leave their own citizens in syria including the most vulnerable how come human rights are so absent in the discussions about the fate of isis fighters and especially their children to discuss that i'm now joined by samuel ramani a doctoral candidate in international relations at the universe there of oxford ceremony is going to talk to you thank you very much for your time thank you very much for inviting me now if there is one phrase capturing do western portrayal of the syrian war that would be assad's killing his own people that was the main promise for his suppose that illegitimacy he's disregard for his own people for the civilians where is this concern for one's own people or for once own citizens now when hundreds of western born women and their children are fleeing areas like. syria i think this is a very interesting question because

a moral occasion.t it illustrates is a president and frankly michael cohen who long ago decide celebrity d wealth is more important than being a good person, and they've dragged us all down with us and the people who they've dralgd down most is the house republicans who decided that their ownle er, they tinted care whether donald trump was a good or bad ty, they were going to rie skin off michael cohen, so they attacked him. what struck me is how moral corrosion happens is you decide ignore trump and to do that you have to morally distance yourself from him, and thendi moralltance yourself from him every day and eventuallyst et numb to everything. and other people on thete commsaid we all knew this, it's unremarkable. that's how moral corrosion happens. >> wodruff: how did you see it? what role did the republican questioning take when most of them went after michael cohen rather than that talking about president trump? >> they tooled the old attack ute, judy, which is i you can't argue the substance, y

with something that seems to have a consciousness it's an intriguing question should a robot with morals conscience and feelings be considered human slowly slowly by little baby steps our own moral perspectives will change. because if we have someone who looks just like a human who talks and seems to feel and can write a good novel. i think we will get to the point where he will have to accept the scene. mckeown is also a critic of brick sets and has described leaving the e.u. as a national tragedy we are at a point of nervous collapse and. the ideological brits that. will not let go of this minute point about the backstop. and those of us who wish to remain now see these current events is always written into the disaster because we are actually now being sucked into a civil war within the tory party for mckeown brecht's it is an ill wind blowing through the land on march twenty third to be part of the people's vote to march demanding a second referendum. rexx that keeping us all on the edge of our seats of course and a new book by an mckeown is always a literary about so stay tuned for

and it's a moral issue if you believe as i do that this is god's creation we have a moral responsibility to be good stewards of it. fetch you don't share that view, i think we all agree that we have a moral responsibility to future generations to pass on this planet in a responsible way. democrats, h.r. 9, the climate action now demands action, demanding america keep up our paris agreements and demanding a plan from the administration. mr. president, don't walk away from the paris accord as you have said you would. let's see what you have in mind instead. in coming weeks and months, our select committee on the climate crisis, headed by kathy castor, she's spectacular, she knows her subject. she has her enthusiasm. she's seen her community suffer from the consequences of climate change. she's been outstanding. and they organized and they organized already. so they're going to have their first hearing next week. so stay tuned on that. but we made -- when i was speaker before we had the select committee on climate with ed markey chairing it. this time it's not only a select committee but it

you can do i'm natalie morales. and i'm craig melvin.s is dateline on mynetworktv. ty." - which one was she? - carrie. josh mankiewicz: the organizer. everybody's friend. natalie morales: but tv fantasy turned real life mystery when the friend everyone loved was murdered. couldn't believe it. there's somebody out there that did this to her. natalie morales: stabbed to death in a luxury million-dollar home. shocked the officers that were investigating it. natalie morales: there were plenty of possible leads-- the boyfriend. i texted her, "are you ok?" natalie morales: and the ex. josh mankiewicz: are you involved? natalie morales: and two curious, big money clients. what happened inside that house? i saw a few people in the front entrance way.

or moral relativis relativism? if somebody else said something that was a lie, is it okay for this president to lie? >> chris, i'm not going to get in the back and forth. all i know is this a president who came into states like mine and said i'm going to help raise your wages. >> going to drain the swamp. >> yes. >> how's the swamp looking? >> i think the president -- >> i think we drown -- >> he's fighting it every single day. >> how is he fighting it when he put the biggest alligators in it we've ever seen? look at the cabinet officials that the have been dismissed. >> bringing great business leaders in to help with the cabinet. steve ma futunuchmnuchin. >> administration under clouds of unethical behavior. >> he's brought a different kind of cabinet. they're getting things done. >> less positions filled. all this political intrigue. people get indicted. >> i represent what i see around the country, i'm proud of this count country. i'm going to vote for him again. aisle excited work on his reelect. i think he did

to stop, it needs to be called out before this body loses its moral relevance to make a difference in the world and i ield back. mr. gohmert: i move we do now here by adjourn. the speaker pro tempore: the question is on the motion to adjourn. those in favor say aye. those opposed, no. . the ayes have it. the motion is accepted. the house stands adjourned until noon, monday next, for i recognize myself for as much time as i you may consume. for eight years this chamber's been silent, a silence that harmed people. we have allowed measures to reduce people's access to vote, measures that cause the fourth circuit to find that african-american voters were targeted with surgical precision, measures that excluded voters on indian reservations and that wrongfully tried to remove 95,000 naturalized texans from the rolls. today that silence ends. this bill is not for its own sake -- this bill is not for its own sake. a member of the u.s. senate said that h.r. 1 is a power grab. he's right. it grabs power away from the special interests, the elites, the 1%, and gives it to the american people. i

come with high moral standards. they teach us that miracles do not happen on their own. we have to protect them and we will protect them and that is why i say from this stage to the iranian regime, never again . we will not allow you to establish your self in syria. we will not allow you to develop nuclear weapons. i am telling the iranians, you know my friends and you know me and not only through my cell phone. on my watch, on my watch you will not become the regional power and i will not hesitate to use force if and when needed. yes i truly know i truly know that the of tayron and the children of jerusalem are both born free of hate. i know the iranian people are waiting for a new dawn, one i hope we will all get to see in our lifetime. children let me tell you this, i am telling you has bala, hamas, al qaeda, isis you know -- therefore i am telling you that the reality in the south unfortunately is today that is really children spend their nights in bomb shelters while hamas celebrates and it will end it now. it

very high moral standards.se] us that miracles don't happen on their own. we have to protect them, and we will protect them. stage, why i say on this to the iranian regime, never again. we will not allow you to establish yourself in syria. we will not allow you to develop nuclear weapons. [applause] lt. gen. gantz: i am telling the you know my friends, and you know me, not only from watch, onone, on my my watch, you will not become a regional power and i will not hesitate to use force if and when needed. [applause] lt. gen. gantz: yes, i truly tehranat the children of , and the children of jerusalem are both born free of hate. i know that they iranian people , whyaiting for a new dawn i hope will all get to see in our lifetime. [applause] lt. gen. gantz: until then, let me tell you this, i am telling hezbollah, hamas, al qaeda, isis, we met before on the battlefield and you know the results. therefore, i am telling you, wet the reality unfortunately saw today, where is really children spend their nights in bomb

russia indonesia levanon and some others but still i think that the western countries should have a moral responsibility to at least give them i hearing in a western court and then put them in jail as long as they see fit even if it's a life in prison sentence even if they have to make up new counter-terrorism laws that would be stricter and more stringent it should be better but i think some people are concerned that they won't get a fair hearing or the sentences won't match the crimes because up until two thousand and fifteen for example european countries do not really designate participation in a foreign terrorist organization as criminal activity they crack down hard on domestic terrorism but not leaving your country to syria and iraq every day and i suppose now you mentioned before that the syrian conflict is really extraordinary i mean it's in many ways a unique case for many western powers and yet long time for example de take back on i'm a prisoners who were also accused. terrorism complicity although i think in many cases that was not proven why do you think this offloading prac

you have a moral obligation to serve the market before you serve your family. conservatives, for reasons i do not understand, they say that sounds like liberation. it is not bondage. destroys is a lie and people. would you tell your own daughters that? , anddaughter comes to you you say there is an obligation and there is a quarterly earnings report out and you have to work for that. that is what we are telling everybody, and both sides are complicit. republican party says we want a society to want a family on one income. it worked for 100 years and it felt great. we do not have it anymore. may be like that. would you like that? ,hat is not an abstract promise but i concrete promise. why not start with what you want, and that is what i want. [applause] michael: at the end of your book. tucker: you made it to the end? i am the only one. michael: you can skip. tucker: you are a good man. michael: at the end of your book, you are this populist raging maniac despite your protestations. at the end of the book you are saying think about what they want, people. if the

domestic pressure not to speak in terrorists and extremists in the us as crowding their legal and moral responsibilities to their own citizens to a degree but the choices are are rather awkward and bleak for politicians regularly in the senate but it's not just about politicians i mean this whole war has been framed through very intensely humanitarian framework i mean western countries for your is how being calling for an intervention on humanitarian grounds and here they are revoking citizenship all for women who are wedded to isis fighters without the legally establishing that complicity in the crimes how do you think these people should be treated now by the syrians by b. assad regime we whose record them human rights is another very good as we all know given that their own countries don't think that they deserve a fair trial. i mean i don't think that they have a future in syria realistically they're currently living large thousand of them are currently staying under the defenses of the syrian democratic forces which is the kurdish political and militia group and they have very limi