in general, the new york times is filled with great writers. a lot of the times they do merit the attention. are new york times readers, they know when our big reporters are and they know how the colonists and books come out. that way we try to respond. >> have you ever lost a friendship over a book review? >> no i haven't, unless someone is just so angry with me that they are not even revealing it. maybe i have and i don't know. they're not telling me in case the read another book. >> what is the thing you don't like about your job. >> nothing. this is the greatest job. with the possible exception of wind down and reading all day with nothing else to do, this is the next best thing. >> are your children readers. >> yes they are huge readers. i piled back there what i have to bring home. the children's book editor was the pinnacle. >> what kind of work does your husband do. >> he works in finance. the shorthand we give turkey design letters and he's number. >> the podcasts, said something he started as well. >> no i didn't start that, that was u

"new york times" doing some self-editing. per removing the president's embarrassing admission from its original article and now, "the new york times" telling us it was edited, but claim it was on the web all day. >> so, what is really going on? our political panel. matt, who's got more trouble here? the president for being tone deaf and saying he doesn't know the americans feel anxiety or t"the new york times"? >> it was an interesting admission. we know he likes watching espn more than he does certain news programs. this is him admitting he's not in touch because he was not watching. >> you need to watch cable news tv to know people feel anxiety when 130 people are gunned down in paris and 14. is that really, you have to read it on a cable news tv show? that's bad. >> service here because by removing this anecdote from the story, they drew more attention to it. now, everybody's talking about it and people are scrutinizing "the new york times." if the white house pressured him, why they did. for the president to be paraphrased

she is an award winning journalist who has been posted in the new york times and the washington post. she will be discussing spectacle. it's an amazing nonfiction book book about something that happened in new york in 1906. a young african man from the congo was kidnapped under very dubious circumstances by an american missionary and he found himself put on display in the bronx zoo in 1906 next to an orangutan. the spectacle is the story of how that happened, what are the implications and how are we still learning from that story. pamela newkirk, i'm so excited to talk to you. alexis company is the author of a book set in memphis in 1892 and tells the story of two young women at the beginning of a budding career relationship, relationship, certainly unexpected and unorthodox for victorian methods tennessee. when the relationship is sorted by one of their family, one of the young women kills her lover and attempts to kill herself. she finds herself on trial and spectacle is going to be the word of the morning, a spectacle that illuminates sexism in this time period. the description of

\s >>> on the buzz meter this sunday, violence in america, "new york times" demanding more gun control "new york daily news" taunting -- >> i've got to say a lot of folks in the mainstream media, a lot of democrats were saying how insensitive to talk about the second amendment at a time like this. let me tell you, i'm not interested in being sensitive to islamic terrorists. you don't stop the bad guys by taking away our guns, you stop the bad guys by using our gun. >> all we hear from these people is thoughts and prayers, and people keep on dying and dying. >>> that california attack just days after people were killed at a planned parenthood clinic. are the media turning mass murder into a partisan blame game? >> what about the bizarre spectacle of the tv reporters rummaging through the terrorists' apartment. as they play up a republican party revolume that's stopping -- "new york times" reporting that republicans are panicking, they are panicking, running around scared like chickens with their heads cut off, because they are realizing that donald trump could go all the way. >> i have

my "new york times" and you can try it. >> i would like to try it. my "new york times" a google cardboard hinge and you put your phone in here and you can see stories in virtual reality and "new york times" is among the news organizations that sees this as a form of storytelling. have you excited about this? is this a future avenue for journalism? >> i am excited about virtual reality as a plot form of new technology a great way to immerse your experience in an experience and whether that is games right now is the major one. >> games. >> but telling a news story is completely new frontier. it excites me --. >> it seems like a gimmick? >> this does scream gimmick. but "new york times" is trying to show they are aware there is new technology out there, taking advantage of it and they are trying to figure out a new way to exude empathy from the readers and doing that by creating news story in virtual reality...i think it is cool --. >> empathy, i think they are trying to reach those who are 20 who do not like to read newspapers? >> that could be the case

"new york times" demanding more gun control in the first page one editorial in 95 years. the daily news taunting the republicans for offering prayers rather than gun control. the morning after a shooting rampage in san bernardino, that left 14 people dead. >> i have to say a last democrats were saying, how insensitive to talk about the second amendment at a time like this. i am not interested in being sensitive to islamic terrorists. you don't stop the bad guys by taking away our guns. you stop the bad guys by using or guns. >> when it comes to gun violence time and time again all we hear from the people is thoughts and prayers. people keep on dying and dying and dying. >> that california attack days after three people were killed at a planned parenthood in colorado springs. are the media turning debate over mass murder into a partisan blame game? what about the bizarre spectacle of the tv reporters going through the terrorist california apartment? party revolt aimed at stopping the frontrunner. >> "new york times" reporting that ends are panicking, panicking, they are run

overall scott mccarthy came from new york city nypd guy at one time.d he do generally speaking guilfoyle? >> this is very interesting. because you have to dig into the facts to look at the record. some might say it was a mixed review. however beginning with first full in office in 2012. crime went down under mr. mccarthy. and you saw that there was a decrease in murders, et cetera, up until this year in 2015. >> but all of the anywhere centered in south side of chicago in certain neighborhoods where drug gangs. >> it's not as if it's gone crazy. >> not miracle mile not on rough street. tops not in the north of chicago it's not south where the ghettos are. that's my beef they lead this happen every weekend and now he is the fall guy for it because of the video and the outrage. >> the guy got killed. >> keep in mind he works for the mayor. >> the mayor fired him. the mayor had already seen the video why didn't the mayor release the video. >> the city settled this a million dollars lawsuit on this right before he was going to actually rahm emanuel was. >>

the daily news, a prominent periodical here in new york, "the new york times," as i said, have startedough is enough in whatever language. do you believe that this is a turning point? >> a turning point for the media or? -- >> that's a good question. >> -- or for america. the problem with guns is mostly people don't stand with the nra. even nra members in a recent poll found that something like 70% of the nra doesn't represent their views in enforcement of gun control and other issues. so you have a different debate happening on capitol hill than you're having in the country, than you're having in the media. >> do you think the media has a push effect at all or not? >> well, on the people they need to push, i actually don't. the rhetoric is rhetoric of fear. what happened in san bernardino doesn't change that rhetoric. i mean, the only thing that actually created a push for gun control in recent memory was back in 1968 when well disciplined young men embracing their second amendment rights, the black panthers, marched on sacramento, and suddenly, california passed one of the nation's m

the "new york times" makes a bold and historic statement. we're live in flatbush with more. >> reporter: natalie, new yorkers and the rest of the country woke up to an historic edition of the "new york times," calling for an end to what it calls the gun epidemic. here at this church, a buyback program just ended, netting 60 guns taken off the streets. church, "cash for guns." it's aimed to get guns off the street to cut back on violence. >> this won't do anything. they'll be back on the street again. >> reporter: this morning for the first time since 1920, the "new york times" printed an editorial on its front page, titled "the gun epidemic." in it the editorial board said the attention and anger of americans also should be directed at the elected leaders whose job is to keep us safe. let's be clear: these spree killings are all in their own ways acts of terrorism. >> we need to stop talking about how powerful the nra is and start putting numbers up against them. >> reporter: reverend al sharpton called for national gun violence awareness mon

read the court transcripts three years later, oh my gosh, that story was never mentioned in the new york times how much ink has the new york time spent on rape that didn't happen by the duke lacrosse team. how much ink was wasted on ferguson where big mike did not put up his hands and say don't shoot, but actual cases of heinous gang rapes, child rapes and others going on in communities and the media won't tell us about this. the mexican gain rape cases one of the hideous stories i've ever read. i called my friends who follow not only the news and they did not know about this case. it started in the clinton administration and bush administration and it was a gang rape of two little girls in texas and the case went on for about a decade. never, never was illegal immigrant, immigrants or mexican mentioned in relation to the main gang rapist and this is one of the largest death penalty cases in texas for about a a half century. it was a pretty big case. there was one article in the new york times but never did our media mention mexican immigrant or illegal immigrant from mexico until they use the

the new york times had photos of the year including this photograph of president obama with pope francishis historic visit to washington, d.c. and philadelphia and new york city. and a first for the pope and one of the final ask of the john boehner, one day before he would officially step down as house speaker. the pope spoke before congress and talked about the golden rule and climate issues. doubtrancis: i have no that the united states and this congress have an important role to play. courageoustime for strategies and a plummeting a culture of change. poverty, restoring dignity to the discredited, and, at the same time, protecting nature. host: the comments of pope francis as he spoke before a joint meeting of congress. among between its, the top story of 2015 has to be john boehner's resignation as the speaker of the house of representatives. state has the islamic conflict as the top story of 2015. janet yellen making news early this year, announcing the first rate hike in nine years by the federal reserve. here is what she had to say. >> the federal open market committee decided to

front page of the new york times. that's why the gun makers are straight up. comment on this. >> this is going to be the best engineered gun sales season of all times when the new york times comes out and says you can't have them. stuart: exactly right. the gun makers, up 3% as we speak. scott, you said last week that gun stocks were not a buy to you, explain. >> i mean, emotionally you're going to get behind the people who think they will be taken away forever. you're buying into the hysteria and hype. i don't like to do that. emotionally i would see how they could rally. and there are two different story, one is a short-term play and one is the long-term plays. stuart: i think there's an explosion of gun permits coming this week. and how about northrup, boeing, lockheed, general dynamics. do you like them, keith? >> we've been after these because contrast and knee jerk was to buy a gun maker stock. i think the bigger play is the stuff you're going to need to engage in a much longer term fight with radical islam. people don't want to admit it, but they've dec

tomorrow morning when "the new york times" is published for the first time since 1920 they are going to run an editorial on their first page. a-1 of the "new york times" tomorrow includes an editorial called "the gun epidemic," which argues that it is a "moral outrage and national disgrace, the state of our nation's gun laws." again, first time they've run an editorial on page 1 since 1920. that's tomorrow morning in the "new york times." >> gun control activist has become a white whale. a loophole in our existing gun laws allows thousands of people a year to buy a gun as long as they don't buy it from a gun store. basically the result of is that if you buy a firearm at a federally licensed deal erk yeah, you have to get a background check. but if you guy a gun from a private sell, even if it's at a gun show, then congratulations, felon terrorist domestic abuser or certified insane person, no background check required. here's your fun. -- gun. it wasn't until years after the brady bill took effect in may 1999 after the columbine massacre that congress felt even compelled to try to fix

we will speak with "new york times" reporter nicholas kulish. he broke the story. all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. in california, federal officials have indicted 24-year-old enrique marquez for several terrorism related charges, claiming that marquez purchased the firearms that were involved in the december 2 mass shooting at the inland regional center in san bernardino, california. authorities say marquez is the neighbor and friend of shooting suspect syed rizwan farook, and that the two allegedly talked about radical islamist ideas together. united states attorney eileen m. decker said in a statement -- "while there currently is no evidence that mr. marquez participated in the december 2 attack or had advance knowledge of it, his prior purchase of the firearms and ongoing failure to warn authorities about farook's intent to commit mass murder had fatal consequences." the charges come only one day after fbi director james comey said at a news conference in new in new york, tashfee

so when i got to the times i was hired by "the new york times" because of affirmative action. the women of "the new york times" three years earlier had sued the paper for sexual discrimination but i have to tell you their case was rocksolid. there were no women columnists. on and on, there were no women. three women out of 35 people and all of a sudden people like me began. it was my good fortune to come along at the right time. alex wanted to go back and write about the middle east and in 1982 abe rosenthal sent me there another inspiration along with bill safire, conservative columnist with whom i adamantly disagreed. we agreed on only one thing which was the importance of journalism in keeping americans informed. >> that is something you can share. since that was your first big assignment how did that change your perspective as a person on your views about the middle east and the way to cover it as a journalist? >> what i had discovered when i was a student was that the story oftentimes wasn't the major story that everybody was writing about. it was about israel, this group,

i hear people aren't ascribing to the new york times, could get them to do that. wonder about, wonder your opinion about the ethics of creating a new story i and an immersisive experience. >> it seems like as everybody uses phone to create video at an event and trying to explore new technologies. but i read a letter from the times who said this seems based often the description in his opinion it will be based on -- and isn't that tantamount to faking a scene? and i thought maybe he has a point. >> he might. what they're doing to create the scenes is often placing a camera in the middle of a hotel room with mirrors and get different angles. one interesting part is what they use to re-create. as a witness said in the police report, what do you use and how do you give a disclosure? is there a disclosure that says this is based off an outside witness statements. how do they tell you that this might not actually be what really happened. >> at what point do you move from being a journalist to steven spielberg. if you set it up too much, the photographer is creating or au

dead people would be the other guys. >> meanwhile the washington post is taking a shot at the new york times saying swing voters don't read the times and the editorial is another example of liberal media bias agenda. cefaan kim, channel 7 eyewitness news. >>> tomorrow morning on up close, reverend al sharpton sits down with eyewitness news anchor bill ritter to talk about his newest campaign against gun violence. that's sunday morning at 11:00 here on channel 7. >>> authorities are questioning the person who first bought the two high powered semiautomatic weapons used in the attack and then sold them or turned them over to farook. abc's brian ross is looking in to that. >> we know they raided overnight this home which was father. farook actually lived the once. a former neighbor actually provided the rifles, bought them legally, but did provide them to farook. best we know, he was not involved in any way in this attack. >> stay with eyewitness news and abc news for the latest on bernardino. you can also find the clock at our website, abc7ny. >>> police in nin surrendered following a shooting

new york times now jumping in the fray this weekend with the rare front page editorial about guns. cheri greg from our sister station kyw news radio is live from the cbs-3 news center with much more on this, good morning, cheri. >> reporter: good morning, diane a new jersey governor chris christie will appear on face the nation this morning where he will speak out against a insuring times editorial that called for a ban on military style weapons and stricter gun laws. first time they put an editorial on the front page in nearly 100 years. in the page one editorial the new york times calls it a moral outrage and a national disgrace, that civilians can legally purchase weapons, designed to specifically, kill people, with brutal speed and efficiency. and at certain weapons, like the slightly modified, combat rifles used in the san bernardino attack should be out loud for use. >> typical liberal crap trap from the new york times. >> reporter: new jersey governor chris christie lash out against the editorial on face the nation. he and other g.o.p. hopefuls say nation's response to the re

tomorrow morning when "the new york times" is published for the first time since 1920 they are going to run an editorial on their first page. a-1 of the "new york times" tomorrow includes an editorial called "the gun epidemic," which argues that it is a "moral outrage and national disgrace, the state of our nation's gun laws." again, first time they've run an editorial on page 1 since 1920. that's tomorrow morning in the "new york times." >> gun control activist has become a white whale. a loophole in our existing gun laws allows thousands of people a year to buy a gun as long as they don't buy it from a gun store. basically the result of is that if you buy a firearm at a federally licensed deal erk yeah, you have to get a background check. but if you guy a gun from a private sell, even if it's at a gun show, then congratulations, felon terrorist domestic abuser or certified insane person, no background check required. here's your fun. -- gun. it wasn't until years after the brady bill took effect in may 1999 after the columbine massacre that congress felt even compelled to try to fix

she's the editor of "the new york times" book review and is also an author in her own right.he writes the popular feature buy the book and interview feature in the magazine. every morning i and many other readers of "the new york times" book review turn with anticipation to see which novelist, historian, short story writer or artist will be the subject as we grab our morning cup of joe. joining her this morning are the following authors: margo jefferson is a pulitzer prize-winning critic of "the new york times" and she is a professor of writing at columbia university. her book on michael jackson was published in 2006. her most recent book is a memoir, negroland, and it offers a reflection of race, class and gender in the united states. brad metsler is the author of a series of thrilling novels, and he is a recovering attorney. [laughter] his penchant for research has made history cool, and i think he's the only south floridian on the panel this morning. if you want to see more of him, turn on the history channel. his newest thriller, "the president's shadow," opens with one s

if the "new york times" wants to call someone a man or a woman, we have bigger problems in this country or world than to worry about what the "new york times" will call someone. i'm, as you know, someone if bruce gener wants to become kaitlin genre, i'm for it, supportive of it. i thought that mean he went from a mr do a ms. >> he did. >> who is the mx. >> sting's son refuses to another. >> so we need a new set of - fine, i'm okay with that. >> score one for liberty. lara, the university of southern california's former head football coach is suing the school after being fired for showing up in no condition to work. he says hays alcoholism is an illness and disability. do you buy it? >> it's a story, he's trying to do a gacha on the american disability act. >> it requires minimal protection for people with disabilities, it includes alcohol as a disability. does that mean they can show up for work. it means maybe your employer can take time off to go to a meeting. this is a story where you have so much. it's not what the lord intended to do or does. >> i don't buy it. >> at the homecoming

. >> donald trump under fire for morning a "new york times" reporter with a physical disability. >> youave to see this guy -- airport i don't know what i said, ah,, i don't remember! >> trevor: who, what? that's what i get for skipping episodes. i have to get to my d.v.r. and see how we got here. >> previously on trump-ire. donald trump wants to register all muslims on one database. >> you would like to register all muslims in this country? >> i would, absolutely. how? it would be just good management. >> ah, so donald trump thought registering muslims was "good management." yeah, what kind of dilbert cartoons does he have pinned to his wall? are you mad? that cartoon didn't even have a joke! what's wrong with you, mr. trump? [ laughter ] obviously, the idea of registering an entire ethnic group brings up troubling historical connotations. >> why would muslim databases not be the same thing as requiring jews to register in nazi germany. is there a difference? >> you tell me. do you believe? why don't you tell me. do you believe that, sir? you tell me. >> trevor: you tell me. no, you tel

you know, the "new york times" is not doing that. >> okay.hank you, james, for calling up and making that point. bob, in shasta lake, california, a democrat. hi, bob. >> caller: hi, how are you? >> doing well, your question or comment? >> caller: i have a speech impediment, so please don't cut me off. you read an article about the difference between domestic violence and other terror. the difference between isis or al qaeda or the jihadis is if they had their way, they would come here, and they would, you know, a mass destruction bomb or something like that. that's what they would, i mean, if they had something to take out america, you know, the whole thing, they would do it. these other lone wolf shooters that they're shooting up theaters and stuff like that, you know, that, that's totally different. they want to kill us all. they, and that's what the people are really scared of, when they think of that. they think of them coming and just doing something very horrible. >> okay. mr. betina? >> yes, i think to some extent he is correct. althou

tomorrow morning when "the new york times" is published for the first time since 1920 they are going torial on their first page. a-1 of the "new york times" tomorrow includes an editorial called "the gun epidemic," which argues that it is a "moral outrage and national disgrace, the state of our nation's gun laws." again, first time they've run an editorial on page 1 since 1920. that's tomorrow morning in the "new york times." don't forget grandpa. can the test drive be over now? maybe just head back to the dealership? don't you want to meet my family? yep, totally. it's practically yours, but we still need your signature. the volkswagen sign then drive event. zero due at signing, zero down, zero deposit, and zero first months payment on a new jetta and other select models. >>> for gun control activists it's become a white whale. a loophole in our existing gun laws allows thousands of people a year to buy a gun as long as they don't buy it from a gun store. that loophole was tucked into the brady act which took effect in 1994. basically the result of is that if you buy a firearm at a f

that's one of my issues -- i'm glad to see "the new york times" covering this issue. but i think, but my biggest objection to "the new york times"' coverage other than it being new to this issue is that it's portrayed as exceptional. this is exactly how congress has set the system up and how it's working. the only thing that's not working as it's designed is that the news media is starting to cover it now, and they haven't been doing it in the past. >> host: we are talking with the co-authors of "sold out" about the h-1b visa program. david is this chicago on our independent line. hi, david. >> caller: as an american tech worker, i want to thank you so much, john and michelle, for writing this book. it's about time word gets out. i'd like you to discuss how these trade deals have, as part of ford, wto and foreign guest workers whether it's the immigration chapter in tpp or the fact that we're baked into a 65,000 h-1bs per year because of wto. and secondly, discuss the three executive actions that the obama administration wants to do this terms of spouses of h-1b work p

tomorrow morning when "the new york times" is published for the first time since 1920 they are going torial on their first page. a-1 of the "new york times" tomorrow includes an editorial called "the gun epidemic," which argues that it is a "moral outrage and national disgrace, the state of our nation's gun laws." again, first time they've run an editorial on page 1 since 1920. that's tomorrow morning in the "new york times." no matter how the markets change... at t. rowe price... our disciplined approach remains. global markets may be uncertain... but you can feel confident in our investment experience around the world. call us or your advisor... t. rowe price. invest with confidence. i'm a gas service rep for pg&e in san jose.. as a gas service rep we are basically the ambassador of the company. we make the most contact with the customers on a daily basis. i work hand-in-hand with crews to make sure our gas pipes are safe. my wife and i are both from san jose. my kids and their friends live in this community. every time i go to a customer's house, their children could be friends wit

for the first time in nearly 100 years today, the "new york times" ran an editorial addressing the issue on its front page. julianna goldman has the points and the counter-points. >> reporter: in its page one editorial, the "new york times" writes, "it is a moral outrage and a national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed specifically to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency." and that certain weapons like the slightly modified combat rifles used in the san bernardino attacks "must be outlaud for civilian ownership." it was immediately dismissed by republicans. >> it's typical liberal clap-trap from the "new york times." >> reporter: in an interview for sunday's "face the nation," g.o.p. presidential candidate chris christie said democrats are using the suspected terrorist attack to push for tighter gun control. >> so ting would have been a lot better if they had guns in that room, somebody to protect. they could have protected themselves if they had guns. >> reporter: as they respond to the regularity of mass shootings, cristy and other g.o.p. hopefuls ha

let's ask the chief film critic of the "new york times," a.o. who's joining me here in new york. does that number surprise you? we thought it was going to be $220 million but it blasted past that. >> it doesn't surprise me. this is the movie that everyone has been waiting for. some of us maybe for 40 years. >> you said you grew up with "star wars." you were 11 when the original came out. >> the age of the first generation. i was 11 which is the prime target for that first movie and it really was like nothing else we had ever seen and my friends and i went back and saw it 15, 20 times over the course of that summer. that doesn't happen anymore. that's not how people go to the movies anymore because there's more out there and they don't stay around as long. but it did capture the imagination of that generation and then because of the rise of home viewing, of the vcr and dvd, it kept going through subsequent generations. so you had a phenomenon when this one arrived, even in spite of the disappointment of the middle trilogy. >> right. >> that in a w

let me share with you what the "new york times" just released president barack obama quoted this fact on his interview according to cnn this morning. the "new york times" said that from 2014, to 2015, there has been isis inspired attacks. however, in 2015 alone, there has been 50,740 gun violence incidents causing the death of almost 13,000 people. we have to put things in perspective. we believe that the isis attacks attacks are disproportionate media attention. the muslim community has been swift against isis and attacks against america. >> i just would like to context contextualize. immediately after 9/11 the neighbors around my mosque and north virginia came with candles. they said we want to make it clear, these people who pray here are our neighbors and friends. with the heated rhetoric that is going on now in the political sphere our mosque, there was an attempted fire bombing of my mosque by a young man that went to high school with other children who pray at that mosque. they called him in the middle of the night, let me go but then later on they went on facebook they found h

the sound of what "the new york times" calls trump's applause lies. for the philadelphia daily news, it's a french page enton dra.

this is my "new york times." can try it if you'd like. >> i would like to try it. >> it is a google cardboard thing. you put your phone in here and you can see stories in virtual reality. this is a new form of storytelling as they say. are you excite birthday this? is this really a future avenue for journalism? >> i am excited about virtual reality. whether that is games right now is a major one to focus on, telling a news story is a completely new frontier. >> feels like a gimmick to me. >> this does scream gimmick. but i think what -- specifically the "times" are trying to show they're aware of new technologies out there. when we were talking earlier, i think they're trying to figure out a new way to exude empathy that their leaders and dog that by creating some news stories in virtual reality. i think -- >> empathy. i think they're trying to reach 20-year-olds who don't like to read newspapers. >> that could also be the case. but i would argue people aren't probably subscribing to the "new york times" when the

meanwhile, the new york times reports 56 people have been arrested in the u.s. year for helping support or plot with isis. according to a new study, that's the largest number of terrorism related arrest in a single year since at the present time 2001. it comes as the washington post reports in the deep suspicion of the united states. the paper reports that members of the iraqi military are saying they've seen videos showing u.s. helicopters air dropping weapons to isis militants with many claiming they have friends and relatives who have witnessed other instances of collusion between the u.s. and isis. a commander of one of the country's militia that isis is weak and if america would stop supporting them. >> woe. that's in the washington post. the suspicions are so deep of the united states that they actually believe this we're helping isis. >> there are, these are sectarian divisions. we should mention that this is a commander, the iraqi military dominated by shia. the western part of iraq dominated the majority soonie. so we don't understand political area and

today in a "new york times"/cbs poll cruz has jumped to second place directly behind trump quadrupling his support since the last time the poll was conducted in october. and now according to the "new york times" less than two months before the iowa caucuses cruz appears to be finally logue a little bit had at the gop front-runner. according to two people who attended a private fund-raiser for cruz yesterday here in new york the texas senator raised questions about whether donald trump and ben carson have the judgment to be president. tonight "the new york times" released audio of those cruz remarks. >> the final two candidates i'll discuss are trump and ben carson. both of them i like and respect both donald and ben. i do not believe either one of them is going to be our nominee. you look at paris. you look at san bernardino. it's given a seriousness to this race. that people are looking for who prepae der in chief, who understands the threats we face. who am i comfortable having their finger on the button? now, that's a question of strength, but it's also a question of judgment. and i

republicans again said it was time to pray. the new york daily news wrote a controversial cover saying god wouldn't fix this. democrats again made calls for gun control. the in "the new york times" tried something different, putting an editorial on the front page of the newspaper, calling for outlaw of civilian ownership of weapons capable of mass killing. but will it make any difference? more telling was the most top lar feet of the week by far is when i quoted a blog that has comment sessions on each story since it can used use the same ones each time there's a mass shooting in the usa. the attack was carried out by supporters yet when we learned in the midst of the attack that the female shooter had posted a tribute on facebook to the leader of the isis, that simply rebooted the tiresome debate whether to use the worded radical islam. you would think it would offer an opportunity for the airing of detailed plans to combat isis, but no. >> i would handle it so tough, you have no idea. you don't want to hear, you don't want to hear how i'd

now you are at the "new york times" but let me ask you, now that it has been designated as a terrorist attack by the federal government, how does that make the relevance or nonrelevance of the gun debate? >> i think the gun debate is still very important, mainly because we have this idea that gun debating and terrorism are two separate things but a lot of people say that the idea of what we even talk about in terrorism, and what we designate as terrorism is something that we pick and choose in a post 9/11 world. we look ait the as a religious thing. one of the original domestic terrorists hate crimes talking about the idea of african-americans and what they suffered in lynch mobs and the kkk. the idea it's been designated as terrorism for some people still means we have to figure out how terrorists in america are getting their hands on guns. >> and how we defined who terrorists are. >> how we can he fined who terrorists are. a lot of people think there's real stereotyping and prejudice against who we describe as a terrorist because i was down in south carolina when those nine people we

this is about security. >> reporter: in the latest cbs "new york times" poll, trump hits a new high,5%. cruz has 16, ben carson 13. marco rubio at 9. cruz slapped rubio yesterday for backing amnesty for illegal immigrants. rubio in iowa fired back on defense spending. >> ted voted for a budget that rand paul offered that paul offered as a containment budget that reduced defense spending by more than barack obama proposed reducing it. >> reporter: cruz and rubio have been battling for a month. the cruz camp knows probably sooner than later trump will be coming at him. carl cameron, fox news. lou: fbi divers searching a san bernardino lake looking for evidence tied to last week's terrorist attack as outrage is spreading through capitol hill over the intel failures, the failures of immigration, customs and border patrol that led to the deaths of 14 innocent people and the wounding of 22 others. fox news senior correspondent adam housley with the latest on the investigation and the controversy over the obama administration's so-called vetting process. >> reporter: the vetting system is n

he has been a contributing columnist to "the new york times," the washington post and the wall street george and the author of the -- "wall street journal" and the author of "off camera." in his latest book, "lights out: cyberattack, a nation

>> it's typical from the "new york times." fact is that what we need to be focused on here are two issues. thinking criminals who commit crimes with handguns and putting them in jail. and we have to work around mental health system in this caregivers to involuntarily commit folks who have mental health issues don't want to take their medication and help themselves. and this kind of sensationalism, remember the president and secretary before they even knew what was going on here ran out on the first moment after this attack said this was gun control issue. i don't know what gun control laws are going to stop terrorists from attacking us. this is the typical liberal approach the things. president said it, no crisis -- can no crisis worth wasting. they want to try to turn this awful tragedy into excuse that greater condition goal what we need to greater intelligence which the president has taken away from this country. with the complicity of senators cruz and paul. and we need to make sure we back our law enforcement to take thes

the "new york times" looked at marco rubio and if he could win the nomination. mr. trump has a fundamentally limited appeal. win iowa and mr. shrum could win new hampshire. the second condition is that is to rubio would need to fill the void with those conservative voters and donors. the third condition is mr. rubio would need to hang on until march 8 and march 15 because he probably won't be doing much winning before then. that is the "new york times." adds thisngton post" morning that the next gathering will take place a few days after christmas at a remote ranch. cruz will speak to some of the country's leading evangelical figures. they are still considering other rubio.tes, including rubio has stepped of his courtship act. , butbeing warmly received has encountered skepticism about his campaign's reliance on money from pulsinaul

my guess is the white house called "new york times" is said take this out. >> >> we don't know that. t know what happened but "new york times" promise should have explained what happened. it is possible the reporting was inaccurate or the president does not say i am decide emotions based on cable but you add an update or correction or clarification but the fact it was disappeared undermines it. >> they did not say -- they portrayed ace as routine. >> the headphone was that there was a muted response to the attacks. and obama defends his response to terror attacks. >> as betsy said it is perplexing they have not explained this. the headline or the editing. there needs to be a correction or clarification. that is more true for the ed sitting. headlines changed all time. you can free too much into that. there are space considerations in print. taking out the paragraph, that is perplexing and damming. >> "new york times" was scolded for a story of the san bernardino female terrorist reporting that she posted her views on violent jihad and social media and everyone picked this up and it ba