[applause] >> thank you i'm richard paul and steven will be up when it's time for his presentation. we're here to talk about our book. we could not fail the first african americans in the face program. nasa's role in civil rights before the civil rights act passed -- that's an important distinction. discrimina

. >> now coauthors richard paul and steven moss talk about ten african american who broke the barriers in nasa. [applause] >> thank you, i'm richard paul and steven will be up when it's time for his presentation. we're here to talk about our book. we could not fail the first african americans in the face program. nasa's role in civil rights before the civil rights act passed -- that's an important distinction. discrimination was not against the law. it was legal you can't use this because you're black. it's an important distinction that will become more so as we talk about achievements of the people in this book. when we talk about the rules put in placed by the kennedy administration and how they were influenced by nasa and contractors. our book tells the story that ten men, most people that came to work in the space program in the year that we call the civil rights era, some of them went after employees and some contractors. kennedy was forced to deal with civil rights. these are not things that he talked about the campaign. he didn't bring either of these issues but there was a sequ

. >>> co-author richard paul and stephen moss took about ten african-americans that broke the color barrier at nasa and the use of the space program by kennedy and johnson to advance the social change. >> when it's up for the presentation we are here to talk about the book we couldn't fail the space station program it looks at the role in the civil rights in the years before the rights act happened. discrimination was not against the law. it was easy. when we talk about the achievements of the people in the book and when we talk about the rules put in place by the kennedy administration to try to address the workplace discrimination at how they were implemented. so we will be talking about the people whose lives were touched. our book tells the stories of ten men who came to work in the space program during the years that we call the civil rights era and some of them were nasa employees. at the same time he was forced into doing with the rights and icy forced because these are not things he talked about during the campaign. there was a sequence of events that all happened over the course of

independent macro strategist paul richards is with us as well. joe, investors seem to be taking ace as exactly as i said in the intro here, that china is much worse than people thought. >> i'm surprised by it. i was talking with paul before the show started. you think back three years ago, if you mentioned the word reflation, you brought every asset around. that's exactly what the chinese are doing right now. they're going out there regre replating. it's a game of hot potato. passing it around. the chinese are getting aggressive and trying to exploit their deflation over the mainland. >> the problem, paul, from investors that i speak with, they looking for more than just this move. that this doesn't go nearly far enough. it needs to be accompanied by some sort of fiscal stimulus. the pboc needs to cut interest rates. we need to cut the reserve requirement as well. and do it as some sort of a package thing to relieve any concerns that the market was out. the chinese market did nothing overnight. and we're selling off and selling off hard, directly

eric guster joins us, richard st. paul, both are defense attorneys. gentlemen, go to see you.eneral right, there would have to be classified materials in e-mails over the course of four years? i mean it would be impossible to be operating, it would seem as secretary of state, without it. >> it's totally impossible. that's going to be the big problem for hillary. it doesn't take a long laundry list of e-mails. it only takes one to get her in big trouble and that's what the democrats are going to have to be faced with. all of the e-mails going through the secretary of state, although it may not be labeled as classified, that means that there were some things that were actually classified that may not have that label. who knows what secrets were being traded between them and who she e-mailed that wasn't listed in the subject line classified. but if the information there was classified, she's going to have big troubles. and i think her presidential hopeful dreams are going to go up in smoke. >> richard, clinton continue to argue in her campaign, that look, the fbi is not conductin

. >> we have paul richards here, a macrostrategist. that's the playbook? they're going to go in september. you've been looking for them to go twice this year. is that on track? >> i think it's in play. i think what this number gives us is a affirmation of a raids in september. the fed is communicating clearly they want to move. today's number doesn't upset that what if the numbers continue to trend higher? even with a quarter basis-point move we get a 250 number in october or november? december gets into play, then the market starts to get upset but this one is in play and i think the market can handle it. >> can stocks, i know you think that. doc, what do you think? can the stocks go up at a time when the fed is raising rates? >> i think they can. it depends on the speed just as everybody has said. are we going to get a one and done? are we going to get paul's two moves? i don't think we're going to get the two moves. i think it's one and not done. but one and pause. i'm not convinced it's september. i'm looking at the lehman 20-year, the tlt is up anothe

paul, george and peter. that's right. not ringo or officially richard starkey. included their first drummer pete best before he was kicked out. >> people are like who? >> what? >> paul and george were only teenagers at the time and the contract was for a whopping 80 bucks. >> wow, that is a steal. >> 80 bucks. >>> rounding out our british rock theme english professor deciding to live life as david bowie. we change rock 'n' roll by incorporating performance art through many of his personas and the professor will broker from kingston university, he's going to spend the next year method acting. that's when you really get into character by trying to be somebody else. he's go going to try to be the elusive rock legend. >> he will only consume media available to bowie back in the '70s. he's really getting into this here. he's dressing as each and every one of david bowie's characters including the famous ziggy stardust as you see here with the orange wig and all. that's him right there. he's also posted pics of himself as well as the man who fell to the earth, the thi

speakers include joe biden, al gore, richard gephardt, jesse jackson, bruce babbitt, paul simon, and michael dukakis who went on to win the democratic nomination but lost to vice president george h.w. bush in the general election. this is two hours. thank you, i too would like to welcome everyone to the economics of america debate. the forum we believe will help people be better informed about some of the presidential candidates prior to the iowa caucuses. getting down to business, living entries the candidates and the i asked that the be no applause. with that in mind, starting on my immediate right. senator joseph r biden junior of delaware. [applause] >> please, we save time for the candidates to speak. former arizona governor bruce babbitt. [applause] >> jesse jackson. [applause] >> massachusetts governor michael dukakis. [cheers] junior of albert gore tennessee. [cheers] >> misery covers been richard gephardt. and illinois senator paul simon. ] >> may have remind the audience these men are restricted to a minute and a half of time and if you apply the they will have less time to

speakers include joe biden, al gore, richard gephardt, jesse jackson, bruce babbitt, paul simon, and michael dukakis who went on to win the democratic nomination but lost to vice president george h.w. bush in the general election. this is two hours. thank you, i too would like to welcome everyone to the economics of america debate. the forum we believe will help people be better informed about some of the presidential candidates prior to the iowa caucuses. getting down to business, living entries the candidates and the i asked that the be no applause.

richard said to give. they more oxygen. the only reason we're talking about rand paul is because he's taking on donald trump. i don't think donald suffers at all because of that. i think he only grows larger the more you attack him. and i think that the only person who will take out donald trump is donald trump. so we just have to wait and see what target he chooses. although it wasn't immigrants, it wasn't mccain, it wasn't megyn kelly. nothing has been able to deflate him that he has insulted yet and he is an equal opportunity insulter. maybe it is the voters of iowa that will take him down but not rand paul. >> not every candidate is going as hard as paul is. they are starting to say something. watch this. >> donald trump has clearly tapped into a sentiment in our party of anger and angst about the future. my feeling is we ought tonight appeal to their angst. >> people don't want to today in the negative. they want to move to the positive. they want to believe the sun will come up. >> given mr. trump's positions last night during the debate, you said that you had not given any money to the clinton foundat

senator murray says this -- then there is this from richard blumenthal another democrat who would not support this. and then senator rand paulweeting out this -- he believes a handful of votes will decide the fate of my bill to defund planned parenthood. he also said on twitter that democrats will pay a political price for not defunding it. planned parenthood in a statement recently said federal funding for planned parenthood helps preventive medicine, birth control, sti testing and treatment women exams. lyle in plainfield illinois, republican caller. you are up first. what do you make of this? should they go forward with the funding the group? caller: i think if a republican organization was doing this, the president would be all over this inspecting the situation. here, he is not even talking about having the attorney general look into this. to me, morley, -- morally we should defund them. we do not have enough money now. this is one place where we could shave money off of the budget. host: you do not think they should move the money to community health centers? the cosponsor of the measure said this. it would move the mo