to state. you also have the physical address. if you have a warehouse. if you have an amazon warehouse, it is not clear, sometimes they move product from one warehouse to another warehouse with no information or no notice and that is all taken into consideration. it varies from state to state and it is difficult to navigate all of that. chair wyden: next question would be for you, ms. yetter. obviously, states that have the autonomy to administer their own taxes generally have the more complicated systems. this strikes me that it makes for even more challenges for america's small businesses. we talked a lot today about sales taxes. there are thousands of local jurisdictions across the country. businesses have to figure out how to comply with 45 state sales tax systems. with some states sellers have to deal with local tax compliance separately. you touched on this. can you elaborate on how these additional significant burdens affect remote sellers? >> colorado, alaska, hawaii, and alabama are tr

states. arizona would not have two democratic senators, democratic governor, a democratic secretary of state, a democratic attorney general if it wasn't because of the impact of nevada, nevada organizers, nevada learned how to teach the many states in the west along with colorado how to transform these states from deep red states to have -- and the same goes to south carolina and the impact of georgia. and these neighboring states have these contagious opportunity and i think this window really opens up the door of diversifying, not only the calendar but the staff that gets hired, the folks that impact our democratic party to win major elections. and i do strongly support that we continue this re-evaluation in 2028 as a means to what else we can do for the country with this lineup. so we are finally putting in i think the commitments that's in our credo, in our bylaws, in our charter to actually diversify not only the body of the d.n.c. but also how we elect the president of the united states

in new hampshire it is set by state law. and nevada it is set by state ball -- state law. in michigan it is established by state law. for each one of these state, we will require that by january 5 2023 that they provide certification or information back to the committee showing that they are taking those apps. between now and january 5, each state needs to take the steps to hold to set primary dates on the date that we are granting them a waiver for. if they do not take those deep -- take those steps, if they don't meet the requirements and give us necessary certifications by january 5, they waivers are automatically null and void, and those states are thus required to go in the window with every other state. >> i will be happy to elaborate on any of the details that you are any of the members have questions on. >> are there any questions for greg? -- for graham? hearing none, i move a resolution that will be displayed on the screen which grants ravers to rule 12 a, on february 3, 2024, new hampshire and nevada on february 6, georgia on february 13, and michigan on februar

state >> state federal, about 4200. why >> do you combine state and federal in that's not state local? it's not a trick question. it's a question. curiosity. we normally separate federal money with state and local. you guys to do the other way. why? >> local jails is a different type of facility then federal and state prison. >> isn't state prison different from federal prison? >> correct. >> okay, so you've probably got a couple thousand, 2 to 3000 prisoners dying in custody in state and local prisons. as i was going through here aged soon this is gonna be state local but it kept saying local, and it's only local. why did you issue this report, chalk full of information, by the way, statistics, on only local? why didn't you combine it with state? >> i'm sorry, senator johnson, one point he referring to? >> again, the whole purpose of dicra is to determine the deaths in custody in state and local jails, correct? >> correct. >> so when you publish a paper on deaths, mortality, 2000, 2018, why did you only do local? that

all of them have been trained in the united states. the united states has done.er and such that no one can come to power. there is a lipen in france, yes, a wonderful woman who puts forward national interests, where she elects some kind of macron , it is not known where it came from. yes growth assistant, where did he come from? and who's busy? i don't want to offend my husband and my teacher. yes, here. well, is it the leader of france? therefore, the person who replaced mithran de gaully and so on and so forth similar. well, tell me bitterly for france, please, in your opinion, if we talk about the united kingdom, could it take a certain place in the multipolar world, if the concept of global britain has a chance to come true, or if we are talking about the need to have a bright leader , in this case it is not available in britain. or maybe you don't agree with me? absolutely right. by the way, this is an interesting example of versatility, uh, the political process, there really is, uh, nations are cultures, political cultures, traditions, where indeed, uh, th

and the united states.d state dinners at different places throughout time. during the truman renovation they couldn't have it at white house so they took place at local hotels. there was one state dinner in 1961 at mount vernon during the kennedy administration. they normally take place at the white house. however, the -- [indiscernible] -- super important part of that diplomacy, whether it means jimmy carter is making barbeques to introduce a foreign nation to an american favorite, or making special pastries that match the history and culture of the nation that's visiting. the state dining room which is the location of many of these state dinners, it only seats 120 people. so that's why sometimes we see these state dinners moved to other locations. sometimes outside the white house like the mount vernon example, but also having a state dinner on the south lawn or the rose garden so you're able to accommodate more because the state dining room is still relatively small, even after its 1902 renovation during

or red state.outh carolina for example medical cannabis for the vast majority of republicans in my district not only is medical cannabis supported by the vast majority people on both sides of the out, but so is recreational and adult use. so for me i won my republican primary overwhelmingly against all of those. again it is a testament to how not controversy of the issue is if you are talking about in a responsible manner. when you're talking about it with opioids it's an offramp to many types of addiction. a scene and my own family as well as americans across the country. seeing how much when used responsibly. it is an issue i've talked about for a number of years before it ever came to congress. i wasn't either on the issue in the state legislature. i've been issue on the lee as a leader in congress and put my money where our mouth is. i've stood the test of all the challenges and votes against me i go too far, i don't go far enough apart were right right need to be in every south carolinian. >>

state courts, state courts bound by state procedures and having exclusive jurisdiction until 1875. this was a structure that was undersod by the founders to ta a existing entity with exti procedures but to empower texercise federal authority and that's what joseph story in 1820 when he rises and eloquently speaks as to why there can't be a limit on the power it's because of the federal function i think joseph story speech in 1820s relan with respect to all elections. e ssachusetts constitution of 1780 had a provision that says all elections shall be free. >> can i ask you something about a federal function. your argument is state constitutions have no role to play. >> in terms of opposing substandard limits on the exercise of that federal function. >> werete procedural limits to state constitutions includes? >> smiley teaches if it requires presentment tohe governor the governor can veto it that w be a procedural limitation that could be imposed. >> whyoe't smiley stand for broader. similar proposition which is when we think about this word legiate we think about it as embedded in

to mean the entire apparatus of state government, including state courts interpreting state constitutionsjustices wrestled with this case for nearly three hours today, twice the allotted time. maia coyle is chief washington correspondent for the national law journal. and nate personally is an election law scholar at stanford university. the immediate case here is aut redistricting in north carolina. the state court set the lawmakers back to the drawing board twice. and even the second step they said was a pro republican gerrymander. and so they had a panel of experts draw up the court's own map for use in last month's elections. what about the future? what are the consequences if the court adopts this theory which is called the independent state legislature theory? >> well, they could issue a narrow ruling or they uld issue a ro really. at its nrowest, the court would say that, th state constitutions really cannot constrain state legislatureso that a state judge whether it's at the state supreme court or a trial court judge would not be able to use the state' constitution to prevent parti

a federafution to it, but we also see it in state courts, state courts bound by state procedures. yet having exclusive federal questionurdiction until 18. so this was a structure thatas understood by the founders to take an existing entity wi existing procedures, but to empower it to exerciseedal authority. that's what we see. that's atoseph storey in 1820, ene rises and eloquently speaks as to why there can't be a limit on th we it's because it's a federal function. i think joseph storey's speech in 1820 is relevant, toowi respect to what do all elections mean? because the massachusetts constitution of 17 h a provision that says all elections shall be free. justice jackson: can i ask you a question about it being a federal function? is it your argument that the state constitution has no role to play, period? mr. omon: in terms of imposing substantive limits on the exercise of that federal function, that is our position. justice jackson: what procedal limits can the state constitution impose? mr. thompson: presentment would be a limitation. smiley teaches that if it requires prese

in other words, you last, united states fire use a for advantage of united star united states dollars, us a little currency to, you know, who is roy and other countries, including sony's and others. all of this, of course, a very strong instantly number one out the lady payment number to, to prevent all $3.00 and be you know, taking advantage by united states, especially when, when women that asian dollars i've become so kind of the responsible, gave europe united states and i think that he's truly understandable on political studied and of course, economic under you. i mean, as for that military display wasn't much covered in european capitals anyway, and in the united states. and you think those arguments will be persuasive to antony, blinking samantha power. that whole edifice of the military industrial complex, when they have $400.00 basis circling china, they have proxies, arguably, in terms of south korea, japan new zealand, australia, around china. they have warships, routinely, britain fans, warships routinely around there. meanwhile, those intellectual arguments are being mad

or the nonregistered states but the vast majority of states only a few closed primary states that don't allow independent affiliated so this is about those few. >> in the cases you are describing, i think that forcing voters to choose a democratic or republican ballot is increasingly unpopular and people want to vote for the best candidate. >> what is the manifestation? >> people going to vote in texas and when they are greeted at the pole they say do you want a democratic or republican ballot stand in that line, the republican ballot that line. they say i'm not comfortable with people knowing who i'm going to vote for and which party i might be choosing to vote for. >> that is what is called anecdotal evidence. >> voter registration and public information in every state. >> the concern i have about the situation is you do end up with a possibility of two democrats and i don't think that is a healthy thing for democracy because if you are trying to grow a party or do something else like that if you are forcing people between vanilla and a french vanilla, you are not really giving folks

you know, pushing states, right? do a number of things throughout history. some, some, some like say, you know, this particular where people don't have the right to bow. some say to particular group of people who happened to be black, you know, can't use a bathroom. so they did, we were good people having me, black, can't get the benefit and they deserve after going to serve and fight for the country. one of the page you see a musty than a destroy must a. now is that mississippi, the state that is last in damn near every metric you can think of it that comes to health care, refused the medicaid medicare expansion, which means that half of our hospitals in mississippi are about to close. because they, they're about to close and knows hospitals, of course, spend most of their times a lot of their time that is reported amount of times helping poor black people. but they also spend the other manager time helping poor white people. so what's happening to my state is literally the capital's that the poorest people in this,

the german, the states. and i think this is a beginning which shows that this is in high priority for the job. and joe and government, which i think is very commendable. you have been very present and these debates about anti semitism and germany about debates. for example, about the documentary not only an article that you published and german newspapers but also on twitter. sometimes one could even see you verbally fighting with some other israelis and germany. is this still diplomacy yet to to while to fight in the public even if it's a viable heights? was 1st of all we have to think what is innovative diplomacy? i think diplomacy has changed. and through the years and because of communication because of the fact that in the past, you know, everyone waited for telegrams that came from and ambassador today. and i think that because of communication and because of the fact that we live in a different and a i think much more we active, we have to adapt. and those people who don't to them like in technology a

states.licans fully expected that at the end of the day by this point right now, they would have not only the governor's office but the whole state legislature in both wisconsin and kansas n wisconsin and kansas, the republican candidates for governor both lost. to democrats. so the republicans were not able to get full control of the states even though they fully expected to. it was actually the democrats in this election who got full control, who got the governorship and both houses of the state legislature in four states where they didn't have it before. four states you can remember with this easy device. because it's four states that start with m. massachusetts, maryland, minnesota, michigan. in all four of those states, the democrats did not previously control the whole state legislature and the governor's office but after this midterm election now they do. and again this is an election where historically speaking the president's party, the democratic party should have been wiped out. in

there are no state governments. there aren't even states. there are five military districts in, the south and then congress makes new states. it orders the people of the south to hold constitutional conventions and write new constitutions and make new legislatures. but the people who are doing that are not the same people. who made the old states? the formerly get to vote for delegates to the conventions and participate in them? congress says the former confederates do not. so has not only said who's going to be a citizen of these states, it said who gets to exercise political power. these are really new states. the name is the same. the geography is the same. but the political community is totally different. it's a revolution from above and it's a regime revolution. and these new states are ones that ratified the 14th amendment. so if you look at the state legislatures, it's pretty clear they are different. the legislatures that seceded in 1861 are all white and all democrats. the legislatures that ratified 13th amendment are all white. and

the peruvian state is going all out suppressive protests. they have troops on the ground that have been murdering the people. they have been meeting with the ambassador to the united states to pursue elisa, can i met with the minister of the friends of peru just a couple of days before the co, the u. s. government has always had its hands improve in politics. if you look at the layout of politics, there is plenty of, and cios from germany, from the united states, from britain that seek to rome, if you will, or the next generation of political operatives in room period. so that is say western influence and cios and other operatives can try to take away our country and install another. the quality of the ah, the african liter summit has concluded in washington with u. s. secretary of state anthony blank and speaking to journalist, to wrap up the event, he didn't miss the opportunity to criticize russia, making a comparison to the west own colonial past. it's very powerful because you hear countries that are, were here in washington this week,

, the society has 18 departments in different states . they came to america not knowing the language and not knowing how they could carry out their studies here in america and united as an organization to help themselves and to be with their fellow members there are organizations of various medical professions, doctors, pharmacists, nurses, paramedics, before the full-scale invasion, the organization was mostly engaged in educational work, held joint conferences with ukrainian doctors, exchanged experience, sent american doctors to ukraine or brought ukrainian doctors to the usa. when the war broke out in february, our mission changed and we began to help not only scientifically, but also humanitarianly the society said we must help with medicine , medical equipment and hospitals, because we know that in the state of illinois, volunteers are delusional , to concentrate work in three directions, expensive medical equipment that is sent by containers or specially ordered planes, critically needed medicines that are transported en masse in s

with their own state system.es. well, we have a goal. yes, this is an increase in the level and quality of life of security and and so kirill i allow myself to return. before advertising, they discussed that this is not the union, so we saw what was the european union. this is not the union because there is a puppeteer there. and as the united states of america says, everyone does it. please remember at least one case when the president of belarus or the president of russia set conditions there was never such a thing more than what a union, in our understanding, is when our president said that when we will stand back to back and shoot back. if we are attacked this is an alliance, because apart from the economy. we also have spiritual traditions. well, that's right. yes, it was not in vain that i asked for 91 years to remember, as far as i remember, when in march 1991 it was accepted. well, there was a referendum on conservation. union there were reservations that few people read after all the question. how did yo

and the united states same china as a. ready number one aly me or rival, but law official line of washington, d. c, that chinese and most, you know, serious challenger to the u. s. and the u. s. lead in the national honor, in europe and the united states, quite apart from the fact that the saudis, the u. e. the middle east is routinely condemned over human rights issues. china is routinely on the bbc and cnn, and other television, nerve broadcasters, as a, as a grocer, human rights violator. of them all, with concentration camps. i'm not sure quite how they argue the choice about the fact that the saudi arabia is the guardian of the holy places of his slum. whilst scheiner is supposed to simultaneously be anti muslim, but is the narrative. last, this narrative has 3 parts. number one, and only that is loose like the people who accused china and other countries as the human rights violations loose lack of them perfect. they don't have any problems that i am 80 my lation on human rights, which is are slowly launching nachos,

call europe is a vassal state. the united states be you, it's not a country. this is disjointed. countries that are being forced against each other. and just as you know, the globalization has created a natural relationship between russia and the you integrating both of these economies. i think that there is a natural relationship between the russian people and people in europe. here, there is a natural political relationship just as globalization has been fruitful for both sides in russian energy creating europe's industrial base. i believe that the russian people are inextricably connected to people here in europe, not least because they are european. of course, i think that we have to be clear that it's washington doing this. and i think that russia should continue to engage in europe because russia needs to be a political actor in europe. and that's also because the united it part of its grand strategy is the forces to compete with china by pushing it out of europe, forcing it to be an asian power enforcing china in russia to compete against each other. pe

eh, the united states of america as a state, the thing is that today this state is occupied by certainal corporate circles that do not have a national character, they are fine. they feel great in washington dc in new york in london and somewhere else lost around the world. they now run the american establishment, but there, too, resistance to the nation-state is growing. our task today. to concentrate resources to consolidate, uh, a certain group of countries, this is the union of belarus of russia is not enough for us to say that we have defended our interests, we need to expand. we need to create a mobilization economy. here i fully agree. e with alexei and we must build our own picture of the future. we must clearly understand what kind of world we are building. here you say no demonize, the united states the united states at the moment, but built a very tense relationship with two superpowers with russia with china i want to understand, do not happen that will they pull such an open clash with the two of them, well, this is definitely not and that is why the conflict with russia st

e, china united states in e. technological field.administration united states trade representative robert lighthizer believes that the current measures of economic war against china are not enough and recommend tougher measures. i apologize for the tautology, but economic containment and, above all, technological containment. and china, in order to consolidate, as he says, american economic superiority. and over china, listen to what he offers in his article in the new york times. america's china policy really needs to change in order to truly ensure that economic relations between the two countries, will continue to benefit america, the time has come to adopt a clear policy of strategic separation of our economy from theirs , not a complete separation, but one that should be carried out gradually and in an orderly manner. first of all. we must gradually impose tariffs on all chinese imports to the us until a trade balance is achieved. secondly, we must deal with our technologies. in particular. we must tighten our export controls to

back on all united states. exactly. united states was always 6. hello russia. from that project, i mentioned the 2nd since the end of the, of the 2nd world war that was the united states project with russia, from european past. so that this, that is, my knowledge is correct. i think that russia, despite the prize stop by we can start to dorothy what russia should never stop talking to europe. never. that's my, that's my mind. my understanding of is jason in particular. now in the mean, peter thing which globalization seems as we know, it seems to be at the n, or after 9 we need to fax to the signer. you know, in this war you're getting way ahead of me. it's on my checklist of questions, right? you're going to get great minds think alike. ok. brad, basically the same question, but you know, a brand new policy that says that, you know, russia needs to keep talking to year. but i mean, if europe wants to control the conversation, what is the point of having a conversation? ok, i mean, it has to be a 2 way street. it's not that way. right now, i don't see. it's goi

and those values ​​that the united states promotes. first second dmitry it seems to me that we are observing him. you correctly said how we came to life is not a revolutionary, but an evolutionary change, because what has changed is a specific value basket, but the very principle that the united states has the ultimate truth . and that these are the values ​​that the united states believes in. and now yes, at this particular moment in time, these values ​​can change. yes, in the 19th century there was one valuable the basket is in the twentieth, the other is now the third, but the very principle that the united states has precisely universal and only correct values, and all other points of view are wrong. after all, this principle has not changed. yes, the specific content is changing, but not, uh, the principle itself, and the third, but the collapse of the soviet union and the collapse of the world communist system, which still had a disciplining effect not only on american foreign, but also on domestic policy, because it was really

and so united states is prevail because the united states succeeded in breaking up any possible future partnership between europe and russia . and now europe is in a very weak position and unable to challenge the united states as any serious economic. i am unable to challenge china. think of any kind of economic rival you know, makes it. it's really interesting. if you look at western media, mainstream media, there's always, and it's something i'm a child of the cold or something i was brought up. i'm sure george will say the same thing. it the how you manage the russian thread, either it's soviet or it's today who's russia, russian, all of the, all the non. but if the, if you, if you look at, in a more sober way, the biggest threat to europe is that it's, it's not russia. there and right now the connections between europe and russia are very, very limited and said to get even fewer links. ok. so really the, the, what's impacting europe is american policy. american dig out because because of the, the, the, the, the contact russia has with europe now is the least, it's been in my lifeti

uh, former secretary of state. uh, the united states again a lot of noise.ector. ah, which in my opinion, uh, is quite contradictory. character, because on the one hand, henry kisenger in this article argues with those hawks in the united states who see this conflict as a way. well , how to completely resolve the russian question. yes , to inflict such a defeat on russia, after which she would no longer be able to recover, yes, up to the dismemberment of russia, by the way, in the united states congress, the so-called helsinki commission is openly discussing, uh, the question of the so-called decolonization, that is, the dismemberment of russia, so henry tells them with a gussage , no, this is too dangerous. yes, and the negative consequences of the implementation of such a scenario would be simply catastrophic. yes , it's just disastrous. well, firstly, russia will not allow such a scenario. yes, a and now this is the direct path to nuclear war application. uh, nuclear weapons. yes, this is on the one hand, if he says that russia must remain part of the glo

and that's where the united states and united states and continue to insist not only on the maintenance of nato expansion and expansion of nato, that meant essentially moving the dividing line in the cold war, a 1000 miles east of a partnership with russia. you're actually intensified the conflict with russia. i mean, it is a lot more intensely. it was of the cold war. i mean, we didn't get this, we didn't get anything like this year. so the like to say says prevail because the united states succeeded in breaking up any possible future partnership between europe and russia. and now europe is in a very weak position and unable to challenge the united states as any serious economic. i am unable to challenge china. think of any kind of economic rival you know, makes it's, it's really interesting. if you look at western media, mainstream media, there's always, and it's something i'm a child of the cold or something i was brought up. i'm sure george will say the same thing the how you manage the russian thread, either it's soviet or it's today who's russia, russian, all of the, all the non.

to state. it shouldn't be needed and maybe it won't be, but if the supreme court does outrageously erase the constitutional protection for the freedom to marry this law will mitigate the harms. f it doesn't override state laws restricting who can marry in state, congress doesn't have that power, but it can require all states and local governments to treat all married couples equally. this law also doesn't answer the open questions about religious objections. in the private sector, but the laws bipartisan religious amendments make explicit safeguards for religious liberty and house of worship and organizations formed for religious purposes not craftstores, hobby lobby, not web designs 303 creative or bakers or florist. allowed religious base discrimination in many private sector institutions businesses universities taxpayer funded social services and that matters, because discrimination against lgbtq people in those context is a huge problem. that is why we neat equality act. we need the equalit

this is the closest state to us, the closest people to us. think that while you and i are in power, we will adhere to such a trend, if it were otherwise, it would be like ukraine's sovereignty, independence is unshakable and all sorts of talk here or there, otherwise it means a betrayal of the interests of the belarusian people. yes we are with russia as a sovereign and independent state. i say this calmly, knowing the position of the president of russia. we are not even discussing this issue now. we cut off once and agreed. how are we going to act signed these 28 programs? there is no encroachment in any program on our sovereignty and independence december is expected to be intensive negotiations. in a broad composition, the heads of state to join members, the governments of the heads of ministries and departments in the parties to discuss in detail the entire spectrum of more relevant issues of belarusian russian integration then, in a one-on-one format, the president will continue negotiations, and then they will make a statement and answe

this state court should not be able to police the state regulations.ey should be limited to procedure or the mechanism by which state law is adopted. what that looks like here is you have gerrymander plan, the state court cannot strike it down under the state constitution because that would be weighing in on the substance. but if there is some procedural regulation at the state legislature has violated, perhaps the state court can weigh in on that. justice coney barrett seems somewhat skeptical of this procedure. oftentimes times it is difficult to have a clear line between substance and procedure. for example, justice sotomayor or honed in on this and gave the attorney for the state legislature this hypothetical where she is basically like, look, what if you have a state constitutional provision that requires the redistricting plan be adopted in a special session in the state legislature violates that and adopts the redistricting plan during a regular session? is that a substantive or procedural situation? the attorney for the state legislature said t

independent, that is, of the state supreme courts and the state constitutions. independent state legislator theory, it may well still attempt to fashion a standard review that would constrain the stakes supreme court, and the state constitutions. it

of patterson state park. the chapter goes on to describe how the apostle islands in the swamp bay were formed and explain the islands are here can see off the off the tip of the bayfield here's sharma and bay next to the peninsula and my chapter explains how plant and animal communities developed in the area after the glacier retreated. i also into early human community is along the shore, such as the archaic people which included the old copper culture. beginning about 6000 years ago, native people learned to extract shlow of copper from lake superior shore as as and in number of other areas around great lakes and it is shown in this depiction that i found in the milwaukee public museum website. and they made all kinds of tools and weapons and eventually any personal, personal ornaments out of copper. they're thought to be the world's first metal smiths. and later came the ojibway woodland and most recently, the ojibwe, who expanded across much of northern wisconsin when europeans had expanded, when much, wh

this applies to the entire policy of the united states in general.rd to russia, since nato expansion, remember how many times we have heard that we will not give russia the right to veta, we will not let russia determine which country can join nato and which cannot, including ukraine, because nato expansion, we believe, does not pose any threat to russia's security, and russia thereby refuses, in general, the right to decide and determine for itself what constitutes a security threat for it, what is not the same here the other day just on the eve of arrival. e zelensky washington john kirby official e, spokesman, and the national security council. just stated we will not let russia possibly dictate to us, which could lead to an escalation. here i literally quoted him. how it is? yes, it really is. you are absolutely right. this is russia determines what can lead to escalation, what cannot at the moment, not the united states, but based on what john kirby and the biden administration as a whole declare. we are indeed moving towards this very escalatio

they're not like the united states . they just want to protect their own country and their own region. perfectly natural, isn't it? and the u. s. can't do anything about it because they're the most powerful country you. you've got the chinese communist party talking points down perfectly. but i would push back and say that they actually have used their military to cause, you know, on settlement and disruption to the peace and stability of the, of the asia pacific region. you know, i was like, like in order to begin, i spent almost 30 years in u. s. navy. and when i 1st started going to see an asian pacific, it was relatively calm place. and we didn't have nations that were worried about conflict with china. we didn't have the nation like japan saying, we're going to blow away 70 years of history and we're going to start preparing ourselves because china is getting ready to use military force to attack, not just i want, but as us as well. and so china has been a force for disruption and it use or military forces to threat

state of israel just 11 minutes after they were created.ore it. not just as another sovereign nation, but as an embodiment of the great ideals of civilization. the statue reaffirms our unbreakable commitment to israel and other allies. which are based upon our shared values and interests. harry truman's lesson number three, live up to our values. truman knew that the fight for freedom was not restricted to distant lands. one of his shining moments as president was his commitment to challenging civil rights, including in our military. as it was early stated, on january 20, six 1940, eight president truman signed executive order 99 81, which made segregation and our military illegal. truman understood the importance of living up to our founding values that we all created equal. and that is especially true when americans are fighting together in foxholes. lesson number four by him in truman is on his statue. the buck stops here. i hope not as the policy makers walk through and they admire the statue, they read all the way down to the bottom. t

states actually see the united states.0 years ago, patriots were stationed in poland and romania, actually. why? in order to defend against threats from such adversaries ? in the next five years , the whole of europe will be more protected in ukraine. i will ask what is going on when the minister of murder, the minister of attack, and in fact the minister of defense of the russian federation serhii shoyguk says that they are ready to attack again, then vladimir putin says what i am ready to agree on acceptable resolutions of the war in ukraine with all sides. i understand that by all sides he means exactly the united states of america. there was definitely ukraine . there was ukraine. in this story, in your opinion, did the united states of america hear this signal or not, and are they now ready to talk about all the acceptable solutions to the war in ukraine, what solutions can be proposed, please, the last statement of the official united states states on this matter has been since thursday , december 22, secretary of st