commissioner sugaya >> yes. move to approve the minutes of july 17th and 24th. >> second. >> on that motion to adapt the minutes commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero and places you on item 9 commissioners questions or comments >> commissioner antonini. >> i was interested in seeing an article in willie brown's column had to be an interest by a group to build a facility he sdrabd it as a soccer stadium but payroll $600,000 for this construction it maybe something in the city of brisbane we might want to look at this with the demolition of candle stick had he host olympics and others fence it must have open ceremonies very close to the city it's something to look to find out what's happening go obviously a great site served and caltrain and mini light rail a short distance from the site and not too far from bart so one of many uses

commissioner sugaya. commissioners first on your calendar are items proposed for continuance at 9 west portal affordable housing discretionary review authorization to augu august 7, 2014, there are no speaker cards >> any comments on the items proposed for continuance seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner johns >> move to approve. >> move to continue. >> sorry. on that motion to continue. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes 7 to zero and places you under your consent calendar calendar, are considered to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. there will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests in which event the matter shall be removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. it

commissioner sugaya. >> yeah. that won't get at the problem the issue is current state of the building all the buildings in san francisco are not code compliant my building is not code compliant it's built in 82 the issue is how do you get at that to insure public safety. >> i've heard no amendment by the maker of the motion. >> i would certainly consider prohibition and short term rentals a planning code violation. >> i'll second that amendment. >> commissioner moore. >> i'm glad beer forwarding additional questions to the board of supervisors the one pressuring idea it the residential that's not being responded to as further discussion item i think the consequences are too far reaching for me if nothing else i'd like to have a further discussion for itself helping the board of supervisors broadening our investigation would be a much more comfortable solution for me. >> shawl we take a crack there's a motion. >> commissioner sugaya. >> yeah. what's stripping an issue that's so important to the city we're

commissioner sugaya. >> i'm going to make a motion and allowing the roof-deck shall be pulled back the staff can work with the developer and there will be an appropriate stair penthouse structure as minimal as it can be and that also will be set back as far as we can get it from the front of the building. >> second. >> commissioners there is a motion and a second to take dr to eliminate the penthouse and provide for a minimal stair penthouse to access - a roof-deck. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. and places you on our final calendar - >> i image we also need another motion on the dr and for the may or may not dr. >> move to approve the demolition and the construction. >> yes. >> may having i have a second. >> thank you. on that may or may not demolition and new construction. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis

rouse commissioner sugaya from item 12. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong. commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously have to zero and you may proceed mr. johnson. good afternoon commissioner president wu and members of the commission i'm tim johnson if the environmental impact report from the san francisco planning department the item is the certification of a financial environmental impact report or eir for the proposed recreational ground water recovery project that is supported by itself puck given the other things a representative of the puc is here and available to provide a brief overview of the plan in this case if you wish >> let's hold off if there's questions from the commissioners. >> with that, a copy of the draft eir certification motion it was published on april 10th of 2014 and the project vicinity were held in san mateo county on may 24th, 2013, and here before the planning department the public comme

. >> commissioner sugaya. >> thank you yes. when john comes to speak i'm other than the edge of my seat. i note that nike has said that he i don't think hesitate one hundred percent supportive as he said but it comes down to the center making a lot of accommodations for what the community minded especially in terms of the traffic transportation on 79sz pedestrian side for him to say it's a matter of some details i think is quite commend able to the project sponsor to accommodate the needs of todco in the community. that said i know there's been a letter sent to the commissioners in which i think john is still hedging his bets to make sure that things get implementedrepo >> so i don't know question he guess is are any of the items that were set are any of the requests part of our specific approval today or not mr. staff and number one number 2 is the comment. >> hi commissioner johnson there are through the mitigation monitoring program that is a result of the eir and included in the condition of the approval there's mitigation

commissioner sugaya. we do expect commissioner hillis arriving late. commissioners, first on your calendar is items for continuance item one at 320 through 4 hundred paul discretionary use authorization for continuance. item b and c at 660 third discretionary review authorization are proposed for september 11, 2014. item 3. for the next case at 19 through 25 mason street request for compliance and variance are proposed for continuance until september 18th. item 4 at one 10 stewart street a negative declaration is proposed for few minutes until september 4th item 5 for the next case at 14 telegraph hill, 20th street discretionary review authorization until october 9, 2014, pr item 6 case the patrick rode and gun club a appraisal of a perimeter negative declarations froept for continuance october 23rdrd. commissioners under our discretionary review calendar items 19 on green street a may or may not discretionary review we've received a requester inform the project sponsor to continue to october 18th and for item next at 1804 request for discretionary rev

commissioner sugaya >> yes. just to get some information out front currently i guess this is for the project sponsor. so in the staff report it says that in the future you're planning to have 4 full-time teachers. one full-time director, one apartment cook and one part time cleaner that totals 7 staff can you tell me currently your staffing situation >> we have two vs. that help us at school a cook she's she's also a clearer two part time teachers and myself as a director and a take care. most of your teachers are working and one take care sometimes when it is raining outside she can take a car but ail leave the area and walk >> so the number of total staff of people would not appreciatively change that much it sounds like even though changing from teachers to full-time staff so the number hovers around 7 between the two. >> yeah. >> okay. thank you. so just wanted to ask that question because there's a big issue with parking. and i think that part of that is, of course, the parking situation the pickup is going

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong p commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. >> the commission will take a 15 minute break. >> and welcome back to the planning commission regular hearing for thursday, august 14, 2014. commissioners we left off under our regular calendar and will be talking up 1213 abc and for those causatises also known as moscone center please notice the admiring ends on june 16, 2014, it public comment may not be respond to in writing case numbers 13 e k r v and x under the california quality act determination for consideration of general plan referral and request for variances >> commissioner moore. >> the city attorney has advised that i ask for recusal on o this my decade employment may invoke the impression tailors or there's a conflict of interest. >> motion inform recuse. >> on that motion to rouse commissioner moore. commissioner antonini. commissioner hillis. commissioner johnson. commissioner moore. commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu

commissioner sugaya. commissioner fong and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes naming 7 to zero zoning administrator what say you >> close the public hearing i'll take it under as time the possibility of placing bicycle parking to reduce the needs for any parking and note condition 5 of the motion requires a liaison be identified by the sponsor. >> that places you on our discretionary review calendar one remaining item for case and 2013 d and v. may or may not discretionary review authorization and the request for the zoning will consider >> good afternoon jessica the planning staff ms. a questioning for the it demolition of a self-same the department is recommending not to take dr and approve that as proposed as mentioned this has had a recent situation that the existing property is not affordable and meaning that the property and land value is greater than 80 percent of the combined land of the single-family homes in san francisco our code will exempt rh1 requirements and could be approved administratively but this i

kathrin moore and bill sugaya. those are really come to mind. but kathrin moore i think as an exceptional commissioner, very knowledgeable and her comments are very profound and she leads, i think her, she sets an example for the other commissioners. so therefore i'm glad that she's being reappointed. the san francisco neighborhood considering the planning commissioners to be extremary --ly important. we are very happy that she's being repointed. unfortunately the other recommendation was not approved. but we have very happy for kathrin moore. thank you for your service. >> good afternoon, supervisors tang, yee and campos. my name is rose wilson a member of the san francisco neighborhoods and historic preservation. i also want to thank kathrin moore for all of her previous decisions, they are very hard to make and take a lot of courage. i hate to say jargon but she's thorough and complete and accurate just like ir's. i appreciate her work on every issue. that's what she is. she's a pro. thank you very much. i hope to have you approved today for

i do think i saw briefly outgoing commissioner bill sugaya. i want to take a moment to thank him for his eight 8 years of service. [ applause ] as i have spoken to bill about this again, the planning commission as are many recommendations but particularly the planning commission is a labor of love and i want to thank you for the countless handout yours that you put into the job, your expertise, particularly around historic preservation and it helped me when i thought about why dennis richards would be the next person to serve. i want to thank you for your service. the third nomination is for a different body, but an incredible important one to our city. a little less known but has tremendous impact on our city. the board of appeals as many of you know, it provides final administrative review for appeals relating to many city determinations. the board appeals services such as granting and permits. as i thought about this particular nomination i wanted to suggest colleagues, someone who i knew could grasp the complicated details that come in fro

i urge you to reappoint commissioner moore and bill sugaya. to thank them for the first lgbt shelter. and the first lgbtq ordinance and applicants across the nation. i would like to congratulate dennis richards on his nomination. i have worked with dennis for years and i appreciate his openness and thoughtfulness. i look forward to working with him in the future. i would like to take a moment to talk about good government and some perception that i'm having that i would like you guys to think about it. has to do with the last three rounds of commissioner appointments. i'm getting confused. commissioner chan was removed from her position even though she was highly qualified and interested in retaining that public service with the desire for new blood whatever the rational was. then, demetria moeshs, highly interested in it, was not chosen to replace somebody and now we are on the other side of it again where we are replacing a dedicated highly qualified commissioner. i'm getting confused about where we should stand. i think it diminishes our se

commissioner sugaya. and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 6 to zero. and commissioners - take a 5 minute break. >> audience to silence any mobile devises state your name. commissioners we left off or completed our regular changed and on items 17 abc for cases and 2012.00775 those are may or may not discretionary review authorization and a may or may not discretionary review. >> good afternoon. commissioner president wu and commissioners doug the items before you are may or may not discretionary review for demolition and new construction. and a request are for discretionary review for the remnant structure on duncan street those were continued made known to the department it was not properly post. the project is to demolish a single-family dwelling it was looked not noah valley neighborhood and a 40 foot height district. the subject property is on the south side of duncan street that is a sleeping slope the property has 25 feet even if frontage and is depraved with the covered carport at

commissioner sugaya. >> as a followup to commissioner antonini's question about permanency versus temporary. the original approval was. a 3 year period was a rear use i can't exactly know remember it by i voted on it since it was 2009. we have another request because the 3 years are up. and so basically that original conditional use is no longer in effect; is that right >> correct that's spider. >> in 2013. >> whatever. and so this new conditional use request has been strerptd for a permanent situation so but can the commission condition it again? to make it a temporary use? >> yeah. >> i guess what i'm struggling with the original argument was that the owners anticipated they would grow and exceed the space requirement. however, the owner then in testimony said that her business had been growing by leaps and bounds whatever the usage they used which indicates they've been growing so why isn't it the case their though the big enough to move out of the that is a by now the lawyer made the same argument tha

commissioner sugaya. director vice president blalock and commissioner president wu. so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 7 to zero. commissioners that places you on item 13 at 1257 gerrero street request for conditional use authorization >> good afternoon e.r. ray can jack with the plaintiff having you have a conditional use authorization for a bed-and-breakfast for 5 rooms within a single-family homes the single-family home is not - the commission must consider 3 planning conditions as outlined on page 4 those criteria pertain to the employees place on housing public transit and social services as well as market demand fore the proposed use it applies one person and naeld the bed-and-breakfast has had continues demanded from the neighborhood. the department has received no opposition and received over one hundred letters of support the project meets all the remit and is a locally owned business therefore given the finding the staff recommends the approval of the bed-and-breakfast use. if you have any questions, i'll be happy to answer them >> proj