well, if you look at what . the european court of human rights doe5, the european court of human rightsack in 1953. the uk and ireland are among the 46 dignitaries of that treaty. they are currently 13 cases before the court, 5o currently 13 cases before the court, so that this case of ireland ver5u5 so that this case of ireland versus the uk, as it were, will be added to that list. the case and the court of northern ireland will continue, the victims families who brought the case here to the high court and belfast are awaiting the judgment. they think that will probably come the new year. but they had been calling for the irish government to take this case, the irish government has all the way through, really, oppose the british government's legislation. so to have all the main political parties here in northern ireland who all have different perspectives on the conflict, but all are opposed to this legislation because they say in one shape or another it denies ba5ic another it denies basic principles ofjustice. so the uk government will no doubt defend itself in this case, ministers h

on december 13, we will already prove to the european court what kind of human rights violations they. well , it is not just about some individual cases of human rights violations, but actually about the existence of a systematic administrative practice of human rights violations on the part of russia over time. occupation of the autonomous republic of crimea and the city of sevastopol, at the previous stages we proved to the european court, in the european court, it was clearly recorded that the date when the russian federation... established its control over the crimean peninsula on february 27, 2014, and since then the russian federation is responsible for the violations that take place there. a little more detail about the importance of this case, of course , is told by the representation of the presidency, the president in the autonomous republic of crimea and its head tamila tasheva, who once again emphasizes the importance of the decision of the 19th. of the 20th year, which was made public in the 21st, about the admissibility of the case in general and a similar claim. unfort

do you i think the european court of human rights will stay quiet at the moment or do you think that all of this? i'm sure they have a view- _ view on all of this? i'm sure they have a view. they _ view on all of this? i'm sure they have a view. they are _ view on all of this? i'm sure they have a view. they are probably i view on all of this? i'm sure they - have a view. they are probably going to stay quiet, there is no reason for them to say anything and there is nothing immediate for them to say anything on. i think the united nations might well have something to say in what is being proposed and the language in which it is being proposed. i'm sure they will have concerns about the human rights of those who arrive in the uk. to give you an example, somebody who is being trafficked, victim of modern slavery he was being brought to the uk to be treated as a slave, that person would have no right under this system to challenge the removal to rwanda. that i think it's going to rwanda. that i think it's going to be an area of some discussion going forward. i think it will be interesti

him, i will quote margarita sokorenko, authorized in the cases of the european court of human rightsthis was supposed to be the next stage of the case, the first hearings were held in 2019 regarding the admissibility of the case, admissibility, in general, such a case, think about it, our side has proved that, sorry, ukraine is not a deer, and the case is also admissible according to the complaints that ukraine has filed in the european court of the russian federation. should bear responsibility, on december 13 we will already prove to the european court what human rights violations are committed by the russian federation in the occupied territory, and it is not just about some individual cases of human rights violations, but in fact about the existence of a systematic administrative practice of human rights violations on the part of russia since the occupation of the autonomous republic of crimea and the city sevastopol. at the previous stages, we brought the case to the european court of justice. it was clearly recorded that the date on which the russian federation established its

the european court of human rights, regarding violations of human rights and the accumulated stacks,vidence that russia systematically resorts to this practice. we will talk about all this, stay with us, the usual things become unreal, heavy bags are not for my sick back, i have back pain, try dolgit cream, dolgit cream relieves pain, reduces swelling and improves joint mobility, with dolgit cream i will lift what you want, dolgit - the only yellow cream for pain in the joints and back, ask at pharmacies, we wish health and pharmacy... to your family, dolgit cream 150 g with a 20% discount. turn on well - this is when everything is as you want, click and you are in the world of cartoons, click and the universe is around cinema, next, oh, what is needed. me gogogo, turn on hundreds of channels, thousands of movies and sports. tingling and crawling sensations arise spontaneously and disturb you. the dolgit antineuralgia complex helps to normalize the functioning of the nervous system. dolgit. anti-neuralgia helps to return to usual activities without tingling and numbness in the limbs.

is the individuals will go to the european court of human rights.s where we're going and there's going to end up. and there's going to end up. and there's going be a when the going to be a day when the government's going to have to make a decision whether apply make a decision whether to apply the european court. >> and court. » and >> and that's the key point. they would to apply they would have to apply a judgement. they don't have to follow the judgement the follow the judgement of the european rights european court of human rights as on prisoners as we didn't on prisoners voting rights for what, about 15 years? yes, indeed article clause yes, and indeed article clause five of the new legislation, proposed allows proposed legislation also allows ministers to have the final say on the interim applications under rule 39. >> so it'll be interesting to see what ministers do , because see what ministers do, because when the applicants run off to the european court of human rights and we get an interim rule 39 decision, then what will ministers do? we'

the constitutional court and considered in the interests of citizens, the european court of human rights would not accept the constitutional court of the russian federation is able to ensure the protection of the rights of our citizens, no less, and maybe even all executive bodies, the legislator too. .. looks very carefully at the position of the constitutional court, i won’t hide it, for example, the chairman of the government, even from time to time, people come up with the question of making such and such a decision, whether it will comply with the constitution, the authority of the constitutional court, the opinion of the constitutional court is important for everyone. ekaterina fisenko, alexey sasyrin, magomed atsaev, irina kharlamova, news. execution, the program, the results of the year, vladimir putin has already received more than one and a half million questions, and most often russians leave their appeal by phone, the most popular topics are about the north military district, education, medicine and the work of the public utilities sector, as reported press secretary of the r

is the individuals will go to the european court of human rights.ere we're going and there's going to end up. and there's going to end up. and there's going be a when the going to be a day when the government's going to have to make a decision whether apply make a decision whether to apply the european court. >> and court. » and >> and that's the key point. they would to apply they would have to apply a judgement. they don't have to follow the judgement the follow the judgement of the european rights european court of human rights as on prisoners as we didn't on prisoners voting rights for what, about 15 years? yes, indeed article clause yes, and indeed article clause five of the new legislation, proposed allows proposed legislation also allows ministers to have the final say on the interim applications under rule 39. >> so it'll be interesting to see what ministers do , because see what ministers do, because when the applicants run off to the european court of human rights and we get an interim rule 39 decision, then what will ministers do? we'll w

and the european court of human rights.explain why. so although the bill tries to shut down various different grounds for appeal against asylum seekers being removed to rwanda, which have been used to date, it does leave open the possibility of individuals being able to challenge their removal, due to their personal circumstances, so it shuts down the possibility of blanket cases. but individuals can still challenge and they could still take an individual case to the european court of human rights and test... ahe test the law in that context. and that is what i think some of the conservative party are worried about, that that will in itself slow down the policy being implemented. and, of course, the government is operating on a tight timeframe now. it has to have a general election by january of next year. and that means if the bill takes a while to pass and then gets bogged down in the courts, they might not be able to implement that policy as they promised to do, and that might impede their chances ahead of the next elect

court of human rights with advisers, and we concluded that the european court of human rights, whichjudges nominated by countries, quite a lot of them ex—communist countries, had no power to determine what english, british law was. i am no longer privy to what these ministers get told or whether they ask the right questions. but my view is the european court of human rights should have nothing whatever to do with what the british people decide. should be the way ahead for our country. the problem is the intervention of the british courts and there you have, you know , i mean, i you have, you know, i mean, i wonder what these what sort of world these judges are living in more than half a million people for each year for the last two years have come into this country. where are we all going to country gets to go when our country gets overwhelmed by such folk? >> is most of it though? david just finally, a bit just finally, time's a bit short, actually, of the short, actually, because of the incompetence of the civil service to carry out ministers wishes as and to process the asylum see

either in the uk or in the european court of human rights in strasbourg.e, the government essentially trying to keep the courts out of an issue like this. that is the sort of problem that rishi sunak finds. that is the sort of problem that rishi sunakfinds. a lot that is the sort of problem that rishi sunak finds. a lot of his critics would say, what on earth is he doing, what sort ofjudgment was he doing, what sort ofjudgment was he showing to end up in this position?— he showing to end up in this osition? ., ,, i. . as was just as wasjust mentioned, as was just mentioned, an asylum seeking has died on a barge housing migrants off the south coast of england. it is moored in dorset. the home office says it is aware of reports of an incident involving an asylum seeker on board. details of what happened, including the age and nationality of the person who died, have not yet emerged. we know bibby stockholm and has around 500 people, it was commissioned to ease pressure on housing services to migrants from to the uk. passengers are now once again to catch ——

so as well as the challenge from the european court of human rights, there are also domestic challengesocesses that can deal with the past that have victims at the centre, not swept aside and having the rights dismissed. thank ou for having the rights dismissed. thank you forjoining _ having the rights dismissed. thank you forjoining us. _ a man who murdered his former partner in 2012 has been jailed for life with a minimum term of 20 years. darren osment killed claire holland during a drunken argument after she left a bristol city centre pub. her body has never been found. while handing down the sentence mrsjustice cutts, described osment as a man with an explosive temper who showed no remorse. a fresh start was ahead of her. you robbed her of that fresh start. you robbed her of the future she deserved. you took her permanently from her supportive family who loved her and cherished her. you took herfrom her children — all of whom, including your own son, have had to grow up without her presence and her love. they have understandably struggled to cope with her loss — but you have made t

court of human rights with advisers, and we concluded that the european court of human rights, whichjudges nominated by countries, quite a lot of them ex—communist countries, had no power to determine what english, british law was. i am no longer privy to what these ministers get told or whether they ask the right questions. but my view is the european court of human rights should have nothing whatever to do with what the british people decide. should be the way ahead for our country. the problem is the intervention of the british courts and there you have, you know , i mean, i you have, you know, i mean, i wonder what these what sort of world these judges are living in more than half a million people for each year for the last two years have come into this country. where are we all going to country gets to go when our country gets overwhelmed by such folk? >> is most of it though? david just finally, a bit just finally, time's a bit short, actually, of the short, actually, because of the incompetence of the civil service to carry out ministers wishes as and to process the asylum see

and the european court of human rights.o although the bill tries to shut down various _ why. so although the bill tries to shut down various different - why. so although the bill tries to i shut down various different grounds for appeal against asylum seekers being removed to rwanda, which have been used to date, it opens the possibility of individuals being able to challenge their removal due to the personal circumstances. so it shuts down the possibility of blanket cases but individuals can still challenge and they can still take an individual case to the european court of human rights and test the law in that context. that is what i think some of the conservative party are worried about, that that will in itself slow down the policy being implemented and of course the government is operating on a tight timeframe now. it has to have a general election by january of next year and that means if the bill takes a while to pass and then gets bogged down in the courts, they might not be able to implement that policy as they pro

and ministers would be able to overwrite any rulings from the european court of human rights.called for all international legal obligations to be disregarded. will he confirm that the provisions in this bill are sufficient to resist individual challenges from those who might be sent to rwanda, and the interest groups and the deluded dodgy lawyers who support them? labour said the government was in chaos. this is the desperate dying days of a party ripping itself apart, clearly totally out of ideas, lost any sense of leadership or direction. rishi sunak has been trying to balance the competing demands of different wings of his party while trying to rescue the policy at the heart of his promise to stop channel crossings. in trying to bolster the rwanda plan, he's lost the very minister who's been in charge of it, who now says the scheme as it stands won't work and warned the fortunes of the conservative party are now at stake. leila nathoo, bbc news, westminster. i'm joined now by henry hill, the deputy editor of the news and analysis website, conservative home. thank you for yo

court of human rights, and in november the supreme court of the united kingdom declared the entire schemeister richa sunok is persuading conservative mps to vote in parliament for a renewed deal with rwanda. it was signed on tuesday. the next day, british minister robert jenrick, who is responsible for migration policy, resigned. he does not agree with the new conditions of deportation, as alleged. too much soft. russia is a country of which we are proud. we are proud to bring light and warmth around the world. we look forward with pride, forging new paths in the oceans and overcoming gravity. we are proud of our successes, but we never rest on our laurels. discover the achievements of our country. come to the exhibition forum. russia. now economic news, briefly. trade turnover between russia and india for 9 months reached almost 49 billion dollars, which is... 10 billion more than for the entire last year, about this stated the russian ambassador to the republic denis alipov. our country exports mainly oil and oil products, coal, fertilizers. india supplies pharmaceuticals, auto componen

human rights law, the convention of human rights, the european court of human rights being used or openentjudicial review, so the courts being able to look at this legislation. so this hadn't gone far enough for him. just yesterday he was on the airwaves saying that deportation flights would be happening early next year — clearly he doesn't feel this has gone far enough. but as rob was saying, it indicates a big problem for rishi sunak i pushing this rwanda policy, he's alienated some on the right now, but equally centrists, more modernist —— moderate voices of the party saying last night to me, that there was deep concerns about some of the measures that are there which are seeking to prevent human rights claims or routes, people trying to block deportations. there are some provisions that worry people on the more centrist side of the conservative party too. now robert jenrick might _ conservative party too. now robert jenrick might not _ conservative party too. now robert jenrick might not be _ conservative party too. now robert jenrick might not be a _ conservative party too. now rob

court of human rights over plans to change the way that killings from the conflict in northern irelandtigated. the uk's controversial troubles legacy act became law in september despite opposition from dublin and all northern ireland political parties. let's go over to chris page. talk us through what this means. yes, ireland is taking the uk to court, the european court on human rights, because it says britain has breached its international legal obligations in this legislation, which, as you say, changes the way the killings from the conflict in northern ireland are investigated to the conflict known as the troubles lasted from the early 60s until the late 1990s. more than 3500 people died. the legislation sets of a new commission to take over all investigations related to the troubles, and the most controversial aspect of the plan probably is the legislation provides for a conditional amnesty for suspects both former paramilitaries and former members of the state forces, who cooperate with admission and provide truthful information. the irish government is opposed to this approach.

the human the european of rights european court of human rights makes own laws.as 17 guiding principle, it makes guiding principle, but it makes its laws. it's not subject its own laws. it's not subject to any democratic scrutiny. and it stands in opposition to the will of the elected people in this country. the european court of human rights is itself in my opinion, fundamentally in breach of the european convention of human rights. okay. >> thank you for that. benhabib well, interesting stuff. what do you think? gb views gb views dot com. get them in. i'll try and read some of them, we're read some of them, but we're going to a slightly going to move on to a slightly i don't know, it's sort of a lighter story. harry and meghan well, they're facing a mounting backlash as they continue to maintain silence on maintain that their silence on the claims made the royal racism claims made by their amid scobie. their mouthpiece amid scobie. that's book end game. that's in his new book end game. but another voice who has been silent on the topic has also been the who's b

the irish government has decided to take a case against the uk in the european court of human rights over london 5 plans to change the way killings from the conflict in northern ireland are investigated. earlier this year, westminster passed legislation to set up a new commission to take over investigations relating to the troubles. the new law provided for a conditional amnesty to be given to suspects who gave information to the commission. the irish foreign affairs minister, micheal martin, said: this legislation is opposed by people in northern ireland, especially the victims and families who will be most directly impacted . the parents of children diagnosed with a rare genetic disorder are calling for more screening for the condition. ii—year—old lucas and 7—year—old penelope both have mld, which severely damages the brain and nervous system. penelope was diagnosed after her brother who is terminally ill showed symptoms. gemma dawson reports from saxilby in lincolnshire. oh, my word. look how you go, lucas. special memories from just a few years ago. wow. look at those ninja skil

after the european court of human rights banned the sending of iraqi refugees to rwanda, others othersd successful appeals. in britain, the government changed, and the new minister of the interior, suela broverman, personally inspected the hostel built in rwanda for those who were going to be deported from england this spring. these houses are simply beautiful, high quality, everything is very attractive, i must say that i like the way they worked... at that time , the project had already cost london 140 million pounds sterling, although none of the migrants flew to africa. in november of this year he spoke out against such deportation supreme court of great britain. the judges found rwanda to be an unsafe country. in addition, there is a high probability that migrants could be sent back to the countries from which they fled. sunak's government decided to get around this ban by passing a law through parliament. in march of this year, the british parliament passed a law according to which illegal migrants are not eligible for asylum and are subject to deportation. according to the uk ho

the european court of human rights also considered his appeal. 25 years have passed since garodi's conviction, but his book was quickly translated into 29 living languages ​​of the world. the whole process and. during the publishing of the book, the founding myths of israel's policy have been to divert public opinion and cover up the main issues of zionist crimes. this current and also the currents that the zionist pressure groups in 1982 against jacques fauve, the editor-in-chief of the le monde magazine, following the inclusion of an article against the zionism of the spiritual father michel lelon and the famous writer etienne mathieu. all started when we invaded we condemned the israelis to lebanon. roger was born in marseille, france. he was teaching philosophy, he had gone to the parliament, and he was going to the north from the people of politics. years of research about religions led him to islam. until one day at the center for islamic studies in geneva, he announced that he had become a muslim at the age of 69. it was after that that he became a french muslim thinker. if someone was

nouri's family should also go to the european court of human rights. hamid nouri , an iranian citizen , was arrested in november 2018 after entering stockholm suad airport and was transferred to solitary confinement. 92 sessions of the trial court were held on this case and parsa. the swedish court sentenced this iranian subject to life imprisonment. regime the zionists bombed gaza heavily last night and today, and more than 50 palestinians were martyred in these attacks. more than 40 palestinian refugees were martyred only in southern gaza, rafah. west bank he also witnessed one of the heaviest attacks of the zionist regime in which 11 palestinians were martyred in the jenin camp. due to aircraft attacks. at least 14 palestinians were martyred by the occupation regime's warplanes to the shabourah camp in the city of rafah in the south of the gaza strip. since a few days ago, rafah has hosted many refugees who have been tested by increasing attacks on other cities, and now it is under the most severe bombings in this city. they got. the bombing of two

was said, to the decision of the same european court of human rights, to reference the norms of thevention, article three of the european convention, the prevention of torture inhumane, degrading treatment or punishment, practice analysis, restraint. of ukrainian prisoners and those who are in ukrainian penitentiary institutions, this all plays precisely against ukraine. well, moreover, we now see photo-videos of how russian prisoners are kept, there the united nations organization provided information that 25 russian soldiers and only 21 ukrainian soldiers were tortured and killed in captivity during this war, for some reason only 21, although we, well , recently we saw two ukrainian soldiers who simply went out with their arms raised hands and were shot. this is just such a single story, we have such stories for sure, but in the un they always kill more, the russians torture, well, that's obvious, and the ukrainians are somehow much more cruel, it's obvious in this war. here is another question, we see how russian prisoners are received, people come who can monitor the situation,

we will follow and even go beyond the european court of human rights because we want to show how much you are in a case like this. in fact, the swedish judiciary wants to act independently , because if the verdict is actually the same. ok, in my opinion, this makes the terrorist groups arrogant and the victims of terrorist acts are called from the execution of justice . hi in the case and in the court of mr. hamid nouri's case , please tell us about this issue and the follow-up process of the islamic republic of iran regarding the confirmation of mr. nouri's court decision . two of the members of this group returned from england and did the designs there. i personally believe that the british were also involved in this case of mr. nouri, which means that it was not a case that only sweden actually decided because we when you look at the history of our relations with sweden we really didn't have such problems with sweden. yes, we saw the establishment of some terrorist groups in sweden. after the revolution , you can see some terrorist groups that actually have a separatist nanny, for

of human rights and also the european court ofjustice.including yours, i remember headlines in one of your tabloids aboutjudges being enemies of the people. that is the kind of atmosphere we had in poland. this has to end. the persecution of professional independentjudges has stopped already. we need checks and balances and we need a fair independentjudiciary. mr balances and we need a fair independent judiciary. independent 'udiciary. mr tusk has not soken independentjudiciary. mr tusk has not spoken much _ independentjudiciary. mr tusk has not spoken much about _ independentjudiciary. mr tusk has not spoken much about abortion. l independent judiciary. mr tusk has i not spoken much about abortion. that is the one thing he hasn't addressed. two thirds of polish people want the law changed, they support it. they support equal marriage in society and want a progressive society. that is the election result. what will you do about that to relax the laws? firstly, the answer going in government, the previous government have passed... it wasn'

supreme court and even if the european court of human rights should be involved or not, it depends on the decision of mr. nouri's family. according to hamid nouri's lawyer , the confirmation of his client's life sentence in the swedish court of appeal shows that this iranian citizen is a victim of a violation of fair proceedings in a country with claiming to defend human rights instead of justice is involved in justice for citizens of other countries. the eu broadcasting agency has tasked meta to provide details of its measures to protect children by december 22. meta , the owner of instagram and facebook, has been accused of ambush users knowingly exposed to unethical content. be it doesn't take long for hunters to get close to him , we know how long it takes for a hunter to get close to him. in the first hour of publication of the posts, several grown men are sending messages. for example, in one week dozens of people called through instagram. apparently, people like this man are not few. according to a statistic published in 2023, half a million hunters are active and threatening e

in issues that are now affected by the european court of human rights, its rulings, or even the eu courting to great britain's highest court, which is being reorganised to look a lot more like the supreme court of the united states. this spring, after you left the court, you said, "courts interpret the law as it's written, "not as congressmen might have wished it was written. "it takes a lot of degeneration "before a country falls into dictatorship, "but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings." yes. by that, i mean we have to be more respectful as a nation of the role of the third branch of government, the judicial branch, because it is a very essential branch of government if we are to live in a constitutional democracy, if you will. it can't work any other way. if you have a constitution that guarantees certain individual rights against usurpation by the majority acting through an elected body — for instance, in the congress — taking away rights, then who's going to protect the guarantees of the constitution if you don't have a judiciary that can say what the law is an

as long as we are in the european convention of human rights and subject to the european court of humanu can be overruled by your unelected masters . that is what unelected masters. that is what must stop once we do that, we can control our borders . once we can control our borders. once we do that, we can stop illegal migration. currently, we're in a slightly medieval theological argument about how many angels can dance on the top of a pinhead . and as ever, i want to pinhead. and as ever, i want to hear from you. male gbnews.com but i'm now joined by the thomas aquinas of lawyers for britain and a member of the star chamber. martin how not to tell us about how many angels can dance on the head of a pinhead, but to explain some of the problems, the star chamber sees with this bill? >> well, the main problem in the bill, as you have already mentioned, is that it's actually see it asserts the supremacy of parliament, which is good and it asserts it over international law. but the actual provisions of the bill are extremely narrow. what they do do is they, in effect, reverse the supreme c

in issues that are now affected by the european court of human rights, its rulings, or even the eu courttart coming to great britain's highest court, which is being reorganised to look a lot more like the supreme court of the united states. this spring, after you left the court, you said, "courts interpret the law as it's written, "not as congressmen might have wished it was written. "it takes a lot of degeneration "before a country falls into dictatorship, "but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings." yes. by that, i mean we have to be more respectful as a nation of the role of the third branch of government, the judicial branch, because it is a very essential branch of government if we are to live in a constitutional democracy, if you will. it can't work any other way. if you have a constitution that guarantees certain individual rights against usurpation by the majority acting through an elected body — for instance, in the congress — taking away rights, then who's going to protect the guarantees of the constitution if you don't have a judiciary that can say what the l

and ministers would be able to overwrite any rulings from the european court of human rights. to be disregarded. will he confirm that the provisions in this bill are sufficient to resist individual challenges from those who might be sent to rwanda, and the interest groups and the deluded dodgy lawyers who support them? labour said the government was in chaos. this is the desperate dying days of a party ripping itself apart, clearly totally out of ideas, lost any sense of leadership or direction. rishi sunak has been trying to balance the competing demands of different wings of his party while trying to rescue the policy at the heart of his promise to stop channel crossings. in trying to bolster the rwanda plan, he's lost the very minister who's been in charge of it, who now says the scheme as it stands won't work and warned the fortunes of the conservative party are now at stake. leila nathoo, bbc news, westminster. let's get more on that breaking news that police in las vegas say three people have been shot dead at the las vegas campus of the university of nevada. 0ur corresp

and ministers would be able to overwrite any rulings from the european court of human rights.al legal obligations to be disregarded. will he confirm that the provisions in this bill are sufficient to resist individual challenges from those who might be sent to rwanda, and the interest groups and the deluded dodgy lawyers who support them? labour said the government was in chaos. this is the desperate dying days of a party ripping itself apart, clearly totally out of ideas, lost any sense of leadership or direction. rishi sunak has been trying to balance the competing demands of different wings of his party while trying to rescue the policy at the heart of his promise to stop channel crossings. in trying to bolster the rwanda plan, he's lost the very minister who's been in charge of it, who now says the scheme as it stands won't work and warned the fortunes of the conservative party are now at stake. leila nathoo, bbc news, westminster. borisjohnson has apologised at the covid inquiry for the way the government handled the covid—19 pandemic. during around six hours of testimony

the conservative party who was suggesting ignoring european of human rights european court of human government itself . the labour government itself. will we see a similar shift to the right from labour if and when they come into office? >> it's also emerged that potentially blair's government was prepared to override the echr . echr. >> exactly . lord powell, who was >> exactly. lord powell, who was the chief of staff in downing street at the time , suggested street at the time, suggested that it in some ways perhaps britain shouldn't even have an asylum system at all on the grounds that anyone who reaches britain by sea has, by definition an come through a safe country such as france. so he suggested that perhaps european legislation should be overruled altogether . either he overruled altogether. either he knew that that would get into that they would get into a thicket in the courts if they were to do that. but he suggested that it might be worth it, because it would give the government years. while government 2 or 3 years. while those were being those claims were being processe

the family of mr. nouri should also refer to the european court of human rights.ouri, an iranian citizen , was arrested in november 2018 after arriving at the airport in stockholm, sweden, and was taken to solitary confinement. 92 sessions of the first instance court were held on this case and last year the swedish court sentenced this iranian citizen to life imprisonment. thank you very much for your support. good day, god bless you. in the name and memory of god, greetings to you viewers dear news network. for today, thursday, with the activity of the bareshzad system , we are witnessing widespread cloud cover in the country. the image received from the meteorological satellite reported that in the past few hours , we have had rain in gilan, mazandaran, golestan, tehran, semnan, north khorasan, arboz and ghazvin provinces. as the rainfall models show , we will have rain in the southern regions of our country for the next few hours. and it will be hotter along with rain, thunder and wind in the northern regions. snowfall is also expected , we will have disturbanc

an extremely important case in the european court of human rights, hearing in the case of ukraine againstan peninsula.

the same european court of human rights on reference to the norms of the convention, article three ofhe european convention, prevention of torture to inhumane degrading treatment or punishment, analysis of the practice of holding ukrainian prisoners and those who are in ukrainian penitentiary institutions, all this plays precisely against ukraine. well, what's more, we now see video footage of how russian prisoners are taken, there the united nations provided information that 25 russian soldiers and only 21 ukrainian soldiers were tortured and killed in... captivity during this war, for some reason only 21, although we well, recently we saw two ukrainian soldiers who simply went out with their hands raised and were shot, that's all such a story is rare, there are certainly such stories, but the un always kills more , the russians torture, well, that's obvious, and the ukrainians are somehow much more brutal, it's obvious in this war. here is another question, we see how russian prisoners are received, people who can monitor the situation come and see. they are clothed, fed, i don't th

get out of the european court of human rights.he european convention on human rights and then we'll start making progress on the migrant system situation or not. >> goodness me, it was only two days ago we spoke to robert jenrick on this very program and i said to him, being on resignation watch for the last week and he seemed completely convinced that was going week and he seemed completely co stay:ed that was going week and he seemed completely co stay iti that was going week and he seemed completely co stay it was that was going week and he seemed completely co stay it was going was going week and he seemed completely co stay it was going to was going week and he seemed completely co stay it was going to take going to stay it was going to take something quite a story to push bofis something quite a story to push boris of the front boris off most of the front pages. johnson, of course, pages. boris johnson, of course, was the covid inquiry was at the covid inquiry yesterday. the yesterday. he's back in the witness today. and he'l

in issues that are now affected by the european court of human rights, its rulings, or even the eu court to great britain's highest court, which is being reorganised to look a lot more like the supreme court of the united states. this spring, after you left the court, you said, "courts interpret the law as it's written, "not as congressmen might have wished it was written. "it takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, "but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings." yes. by that, i mean we have to be more respectful as a nation of the role of the third branch of government, thejudicial branch, because it is a very essential branch of government if we are to live in a constitutional democracy, if you will. it can't work any other way. if you have a constitution that guarantees certain individual rights against usurpation by the majority acting through an elected body — for instance, in the congress — taking away rights, then who's going to protect the guarantees of the constitution if you don't have a judiciary that can say what the law is and wha

decisions of the european court of human rights, which indicate that we have significant problems with justice and we need to address them. well, are there any fundamental changes, if we talk about changes possible during the war, in the activities of judicial and law enforcement agencies in ukraine because of the war, is there any pressure increasing, or is it possible that the law is being deviated from in view of some political expediency or the personal expediency of certain people, it also happens, please know, with a full-scale war, we observe precisely the deterioration of the situation with compliance with these standards, which i spoke about above, and this naturally follows from certain objective factors, due to the fact that in within the framework of hostilities there, it is quite difficult to ensure access to justice, many courts do not function because of this, these are basically objective reasons that we all understand, and which we can in principle justify, but there are certain reasons because of which we can say that access to justice and other principles, the activi

and ministers would be able to override any rulings from the european court of human rights.ave called for all international legal obligations to be disregarded. you will he confirm that the provisions in this bill are sufficient to resist individual challenges from those who might be sent to rwanda, and the interest groups and the deluded dodgy lawyers labour said the government was in chaos. this is the desperate dying days of a party ripping itself apart, are clearly totally out of ideas, lost any sense of leadership or direction. rishi sunak has been trying to balance the competing demands of different wings of his party while trying to rescue the policy at the heart of his promise to stop channel crossings. in trying to bolster the rwanda plan, he's lost the very minister who's been in charge of it, who now says the scheme as it stands won't work and warned the fortunes of the conservative party are now at stake. we'll hearfrom chris again injust a moment, but first we're joined by our legal correspondent dominic casciani — dom, talk us through what the government wants

not implement these decisions, there will be lawsuits in the european court of human rights, and again, we as taxpayers will pay for unprofessionalism and the stupidity of the government, which submitted to the council a raw bill of 71 pages. and if we distance ourselves from the register of debtors, is there anything positive about it at all? at the moment somehow, as i understand it, it was worked out for a very long time, both in the government and in the president's office, and apparently there were proposals from military, right away, everyone contributed a little bit, in fact, who would not go to the press today? well, of course, if the subject of the law, if the submission of the bill is the government, then it is created just like that, that is, there is a specialized ministry that prepares it, then it is agreed between the central bodies of the executive power, then it is considered at government meetings and finally. it is approved there and only then gets to the council, but this once again says that we have a government, although the president said that he has an excellent

in the european court of human rights, and again, we as taxpayers will pay for the unprofessionalismtupidity of the government, which submitted to the council a completely raw bill on the 71st page, and if we distance ourselves from the register of debtors, in general there is something positive in this document, if not how, as i understand it, it was worked out for a very long time, both in the government and in the office of the president, and apparently there were proposals from troops immediately, everyone contributed a little bit, in fact, who wouldn't go to the press today? well, of course, if the subject is legal , if the draft law is submitted by the government, then it is created just like that, that is, there is a relevant ministry that prepares it, then it is agreed between the central bodies of the executive power, then it is considered at government meetings and finally.

the power to disregard things from the european court of human rights if it says do not support someones do not support someone. human rights if it says do not su ort someone. , , . ., support someone. he is very much at odds with the — support someone. he is very much at odds with the right _ support someone. he is very much at odds with the right of _ support someone. he is very much at odds with the right of his _ support someone. he is very much at odds with the right of his party, - odds with the right of his party, the prime minister, just another resignation of a minister, the immigration minister, does that precipitate another legal challenge —— reader challenge? it is precipitate another legal challenge -- reader challenge?— precipitate another legal challenge -- reader challenge? it is here. the film has been _ -- reader challenge? it is here. the film has been all _ -- reader challenge? it is here. the film has been all along _ -- reader challenge? it is here. the film has been all along that - -- reader challenge? it is here. the film has been all along that there i film has

balance and where does the european court of human rights, in your view, come into this? it have the right to overrule parliament and can parliament then refuse its judgements legitimately and international law . if the if a international law. if the if a country like the united kingdom has signed up to an international treaty , that is a international treaty, that is a prerogative of ministers. >> ultimately, the prime minister rather than parliament. but of course the prime minister is answerable to parliament and the united kingdom signed up to the united kingdom signed up to the human rights convention. it was a founder member 75 years ago and while it remains part of the council of europe, while it remains a party to the human rights convention, then in international law it must comply with it. as you've implied , and with it. as you've implied, and it's possible for any country to leave. russia was thrown out. belarus has never joined the. the greeks were suspended under the colonels . it is possible for the colonels. it is possible for a country to withdraw from an

court of human rights, and the first, the first, who died in this war, among ukrainian servicemen in when we talk about a war of different scales, in large, small, so to speak, its stages, it also triggers me a little when the following norms are used now: a large war, a large-scale invasion, i'm sorry, but the fact that my home was taken from me , for me this is the largest scale that could be, well, at that moment in the 14th, some people simply did not empathy for others is enough. we're already going , as we're going, already, well, i don't know, some phraseology was born, and we use it, although i'm still not sure if we're doing it right when we say that on a large scale. this war was not only in 2022, well, as a matter of fact , i also use big to distinguish it from the previous phase, but the previous phase is also a war, many people in ukraine, unfortunately, denied it, said about some kind of peace there, up close they did not see what the kotsaps were, they continued to communicate with by my relatives there, who are in these georgiivskyi tapes, so what... i don't know, i c

human rights get involved.a minister of the ground can decide whether or not someone in the united kingdom can interfere with a measure. the package is unworkable, they think, or it doesn't go far enough. and they're not alone, the governments own lawyers insisted on the state and saying the legislation may not be compatible with the european convention on human rights, those words are a warning from them that the make or break plan could end up in legal tatters. earlier, i asked lord sumption, formerjustice at the uk supreme court, if this bill, if passed, could block virtually every route to the courts for asylum seekers. it will block almost every route. what i think suella braverman is concerned about is the exemption included in the bill for people who complain that deporting them to rwanda would be unsafe for them even if it was safe. gender generality of people. there's an exception from some of the provisions of the bill, which provides that if that somebody has a personal characteristic specific to the

says they wouldn't allow the european court of human rights to block flights to 14 undocumented migrants to a one to wish you see next. as a new bill is introduced in parliament, compels is just to treat one does a save the country and also proposes given ministers powers to disregard the sections of human rights legislation. previous court rulings against the government to block plans to send my goods to the east african country looks. i will not allow a foreign court to block these thoughts. if the strasburg court chooses to intervene against the express wishes about silver in parliament, i will do what is necessary to get flights off. and today's new laws already made clear that the decision on whether to comply with interim measures issued by the european court is a decision for british government ministers and british government administers allowed okay, thank you very much for watching you up to date. the news continues to address era off the phone lines. the us a call was of insight to people around the world. this has been going on for a number 30 to an international perspective

certain edicts from the european court of human rights and the european convention on human rights butr fortunately, all irrelevant because unfortunately orfortunately, in my view, because i think the scheme is a mess and it was only ever an agreement. all this money that has been thrown at it is for 200 people. the agreement with rwanda is for 200 people. we had 740,000 net migration a year before last and they are spending all this money on a potential 200 people, it is crazy and they are doing an excellentjob in ensuring they will lose the next election and i cannot wait. it lose the next election and i cannot wait. . . , lose the next election and i cannot wait. . ., , ., wait. it certainly will not solve the situation _ wait. it certainly will not solve the situation in _ wait. it certainly will not solve the situation in the _ wait. it certainly will not solve the situation in the southern l wait. it certainly will not solve - the situation in the southern border of the united states. the prime minister said tonight the rwandan government said they would not accept the basic sche

so it's a one to allow the european court of human rights to block flights to pushing illegal migrants to a window. we should see next as a new bill is introduced in parliament compels judges treat wanda as a safe country. previous court ruling is against the government has impeded the process of sending my goods to the african country. okay, then use continue. so, and i'll just say right off to the listing place to go with the i care about helping us engages with the rest of the world. i cover foreign policy, national security. this is a political em house. here's the conflict. are we telling the good story? we're really interested in taking you in to a place that you might not visit otherwise. it's actually feel as if you were there this week, a special edition of the listening thoughts. we're looking at your digging into the discourse, the coverage of israel's war on god's beginning in germany. israel's most dependable allies in the u, where shows and support for palestinians have been suppressed. female france were much of the coverages in the fall and where the debate on gaza has