infected, including those registered with foreign embassies in russia, including nato countries and u, china is also reported with reference to the fsb u, details are also provided by federal services security. together with russia, the intelligence operation of the american special services, carried out with using apple mobile devices. in the course of ensuring the security of the russian telecommunications infrastructure, anomalies were identified that are typical only for mobile phone users. apple and are due to the work of previously known malicious software that uses the software vulnerabilities provided by the manufacturer , carefully follow the incoming information on this topic, we will return on our air. the russian military prevented two attempts by the armed forces to conduct reconnaissance in combat about this reported by representatives of the southern group of russian troops. the subdivision of the southern group of forces prevented two enemy attempts to conduct reconnaissance in combat in the area of ​​​​the settlement of grigorovka, the crews of the self-propelled artillery m

i'm going to to meet china and you know, the u. s. and this year, the consent no century off. it's in union. there's no longer necessary for us to have a place to go to the dental vision or wherever we is. you know, we have an african union, we laptop cheese projector, she is, you know, 26 and 3 times when we're working towards a common thing. but the system now proved to be one of the, you know, we have the continental free trade that we're doing. so this idea of, of, so there's not able to build consensus, i think is the house for you. we move beyond the, the continental. so, no, so the trust direction of, you know, the bathroom, you know, to explain something, you know, what to do. magic testified the consensus. all right, well we have run out of time, so we're going to have to leave the conversation there. thanks so much to all our guest on your katya. wonderful. i know she chary and guido khaki and thank you to for watching. you can see the program again any time by visiting our website, algebra. com and for further discussion, go to our facebook page. that's facebook dot

and from the chinese perspective that china sees itself as a victim of the u. s. tech sanctions. and also it's um, excuse us, of washington to trying to contain china's rights. and i think both the rhetoric on, on, on washington sites, but also on the aging side does not leave so much room for improvement or compromise. i would say that it's likely that both sides will um, focus on. yeah. and not the really major issues, but more on non political issues. for example, the climate talks or also not quite takes control. i mean the u. s. also has a pro, a big painting the problem and a lot of the precursors that are coming from china before they reach the u. s. so i think they could, um, on those fields maybe reach some small progress. another point of interest to this trip, i do think she's in pain, will agree to meet blinking and what does it mean if he doesn't? what bed? it's really the crucial question and we don't know sofa, and it's really also says a lot how entrance, baron, things have become here. we really don't know any of this schedule until the very, very last minute. in

i remember if china was not a success, we wouldn't be having this conversation in the u. s. c's china as an extra central threat because of its economic progress. so all of the things that we're talking about are simply strategies by the us to contain and, and put china and china in its place. the same way they did with japan, back in the eighty's for the plaza accord. china is not going to accept that. so there has to be a new day, a new kind of understanding natasha, whatever ends up happening. the fact that this visit is actually going ahead is this, in some way an acknowledgment. however hesitant, it may be that the strategic rivals that the us and china need one another in order to further their own interest, both at home and abroad. is that essentially the message that we're getting out of all this? yes, definitely. and as i've already mentioned, that their economies are compatible in many ways that they, you know, export and import huge amounts of goods with one another. this is something that has been going on now for, for decades, and it's deeply entrenched and it

u k. china and france listed as guarantors. meanwhile, african leaders have expressed their positions and accomplish with the south african president saying that the war must in calling on both sides to de escalate . are to use ox on a boy, go has the details. i think it's quite remarkable that lodging there put in, felt the need to bring this agreement to his meeting with the african leaders. in my opinion, it shows the significance. he attaches to these mediation efforts as well as rushes reputation because uh, i think what he's trying to do is to counter what's the narrative that the russian military alteration in ukraine came absolutely on per bolt. and the west and media and weston officials liked to present it as a, this cruel attempt to grab your print, entire true. where in fact uh, in the view of the russian president, what russia dodge is defending its own legitimate security concerns in ukraine. and he was very straightforward in describing a russian perspective in front of the african leaders. he said that the, uh, that agreement that he actually demonstrates it to them ha

u. k. china and france o listed as guarantors. but of course, it was the new guys bar as johnson, and the bi and white house that deliberately scuffled those peaceful. and i was talking with international consultant early resumes, and he agrees that washington island london did have a hand in the neutrality deal being rejected. as according to him, he says they want to defeat russia by using ukraine. as we see from the, the draft, the agreement that president clinton showed in the applicant leaders of there was agreement going on early on in the this sounds like the early stages. it was a settlement that basically was approved, it just had to be finalized the wording and final signature. but uh, but then again we had uh the un unannounced surprised. does it say mr. johnson? yes. and i'm sure we had phone calls coming from washington. and lo and behold, overnight the agreement was withdrawn and there's a no real, real serious discuss that. so i think uh, unless you have the us, uh, maybe lender to some degree unless those 2 are in

we changed use on our respective economic policies, including our concerns about china's unfair treatment of u. s. companies. during my meeting today with us business leaders who are operating and china, i heard about the problems that us businesses are facing. including recent punitive actions against american firms. also for the u. s. companies want to continue and indeed grow their businesses here. and so in my meetings, i sought to clarify any misperceptions or misunderstandings about our approach. there is a profound difference for the united states and for many other countries between the risking and the couple of our countries traded more over the last years like more than ever over the last year. nearly $700000000.00 healthy and robust, economic engagement benefits, both the united states and china. and as secretary yelling, testified before congress last week. it would be a she put a disastrous for us to the couple and stop all trade and investment with china. we are pretty risky and diversified. that means investing in our own capacities and, and secure resilience supply chains. push

u. k. china and france o listed as guarantors, but of course it was that you guys bar as johnson and the bi and white house that deliberately scuffled those peaceful. and always i talking with international consultant, early rozmini's, and he agrees that washington island london did have a hand in the neutrality deal being rejected. as, according to him, he says they want to defeat russia by using ukraine. as we see from the, the draft agreement that president clinton showed in the african leaders, there was agreement going on early on in the, the sense like the early stages. it was a settlement that basically was approved. it just had to be finalized the wording and final signature. but uh, but then again we had uh the un unannounced surprises it by mr. johnson. vicki a. and i'm sure we had phone calls coming from washington. and lo and behold, overnight, the agreement with withdrawn and there's a no real, real serious discuss that. so i think uh, unless you have the us, uh, maybe lender to some degree unless those 2 are in re meant for the settlement. and nothing's gonna happen. and if

u. k. china and france, old listed as guarantors. but of course, as we all know, it was the case bars, johnson in the, by the white house that scuffled those piece towards. i was talking about this with international consulting to url ross musing, who believes that oftentimes all and london did have a hand in the neutrality deal being rejected as they want to defeat russia by using ukraine. as we see from the, the draft agreement that president clinton showed in the african leaders, there was agreement going on early on in the sense like the early stages. it was a settlement that basically was approved. it just had to be finalized the wording and final signature. but uh, but then again, we had uh, the un unannounced surprises inside mr. johnson's lexia. and i'm sure we had phone calls coming from washington. and lo and behold, overnight, the agreement with withdrawn. and there's a no real real serious discussion that so i think uh, unless you have the us, uh, maybe lender to some degree unless those 2 are in agreement with the settle

u. s embassy on the island. describe this as historic. now, as mentioned, china, which claims the territory of taiwan as its own has reacted angrily to the news. let's take a listen to what a spokes person for the foreign ministry, how to say to phone ginger china family deplores.

china's perspective. definitely, that's the u. s. has been the aggressor and they've been responding, but it's downward spiral if it continues me. now you have already said that to some extent this, this new law is the response to, to us measures against china and not indeed has been widely covered in the west and meet this reaction to the approval of this new law. now considers us is maintaining sanctions against some chinese officials. for example, the defense minister. do you think the trying to is very not the legal ground to do the same against american officials maybe to well it's, it's possible uh, trying to get, i can do that. they have done it with the european parliament, they have a, you know, it just, it doesn't really make sense at this juncture. it should be open communication. but you know, the u. s. is biting on both sides of the field there. they say that we want to meet and have defense dialogues and things like that. but at the same time, they continue to blacklist the defense minister. he was only put on that list

u. k. china and france o listed as guarantors. but of course, as long as the new guys bars johnson and the bite and white house that deliberately scuffled those peaceful. and we start talking with international consulting early rozmini's. and he agrees that washington island london did have a hand in the neutrality deal being rejected. as, according to him, he says they want to defeat russia by using ukraine. as we see from the, the draft agreement that president clinton showed in the african leaders. there was agreement going on early on in the defense like the early stages. it was a settlement that basically was approved that just had to be finalized the wording and final signature. but uh, but then again we had uh the un unannounced surprises inside mr. johnson. and i'm sure we had phone calls coming from washington. and lo and behold, overnight, the agreement with withdrawn. and there's a no real, real serious discuss that. so i think uh, unless you have the us, uh, maybe lender to some degree unless those 2 are in agreement w

u k. china i'm falls as guarantors. do you have agreed to the deal in the early stages of the conflict according to person, but then scraps it under pressure from is less than brackets. we did not agree with you quite inside that the steel would be confidential, but we also never disclosed it or commented on it. it will go away. the draft of this agreement was initialed by representative of the head of the negotiating group frontier. com. so he put his signature there. here it is when he is, it's called the treaty on permanent neutrality and guarantees for the security of ukraine. it contains 18 articles and there was also an appendix. this provisions concern the armed forces and many other things. everything is written there down to units of military equipment and personnel of the armed forces. here's the document, it is initial, but after we withdrew troops from t f, as promised with the key of authorities as their patrons usually do. through it all into the waste basket of history. were of the guarantees that they wi

worldwide building military bases near china, territory and conducting closer can essence off china coast. that's what u. s. has been doing to china, but it was on the global alex for the full defy those into connections between the us government and american media. or they come up with these, the allegations they throwed out there the see if it's going to work. they see if it will damage business. i mean, they did a lot of damage to huawei and i think, you know, once again, they might be using this for an alternative mode of here that may, we may see something, maybe a of sanctions come down on some more high tech companies from china for sure, if you look at the americans, they have a yearly budget of $300000000.00 to offset china and they use it with, you know, a lot of anti rhetoric uh pieces that continually go out. we can never, uh, you know, pinpoint who is getting a part of that fund. now that money flows into the system. how many of these media outlets are putting their hands in the pie and taking it and coming up with, you know, such, you know, slanderous allegations. it's incredible. but you

over the united states of china, remains the pacing challenge and something that will continue to stay focused on the trip was postpone following the spied balloon incident over the u. s. format extensions rising between the united states and china, over a chinese 5 balloon that the chinese 5 balloon that flew across the u. s. back in february, was able to gather intelligence from several military sites. and then we shut it down, sending a clear message, clear message. the violation of our sovereignty is unacceptable. well, earlier we spoke to nelson wong, the vice chairman of the shanghai send, have a written packet international studies that mr. wong's site is that dependent guns statement and admissions about the balloon, while it leaves many more questions. now the nonsense. a late statement from the pentagon is somewhat confusing because we don't know what was the occasion for the pentagon to makes that statement also is and seems to you to pilot that was flying on top of the blue or rated confirm that they did not collect any information while flying over canada and the us for a week. why the white house do decided to shoot? now, my 3rd question is why the pe

china principal. this is a serious violation of u. s. commitment to maintain only on official relations with tyrone. china is strongly dissatisfied with this function. that's bringing stuff on like an economist at the university of scent, golf, and stuff on strong words. there will china match them with action, as well as basing of course denounces the trade talks between the us and taiwan. but better stand a procedure and trying to denounce has a very high level of government engagement with taiwanda territory that attains its own a. but in the bigger picture, i think if we look at the us, china rivalry, any action is likely to trigger react some. the question is only how much of a reaction what we see here. and if we look at this trade deal, we will see that there is not too much substance. so if policy makers and beijing rational and i have little doubt that they are, they will see it for what it is, mostly symbolic. and so i don't expect much of a reaction other than a couple of words. okay, so you mentioned that this deal is large

date of the news. youtube snatches some of the other double business stories making news. china says calls for more e u countries to bond telecom giant huawei from 5 g network has no legal basis. the reaction comes a day after the european commission and those plans to prolong the company from easy research funding over 6 years experience. i present 10 of the use 27 member states have restricted or bond while away from their g networks. us to make her mike on says able invest more than $600000000.00 and it's packaging

china to spend billions of dollars on this. and it seems more reasonable to use the money to investigate u. s. military basis in the asia pacific region. years dropping worldwide building military bases near china, territory and conducting closer can essence off china coast. that's what u. s. has been doing to china. we're taking a broader perspective on this. what with the political analyst and blogger likes to report a phi delta. and so you will choose a generally speaking connections. regina politicians and the media have all the that they come up with these, the allegations they throwed out there the see if it's going to work. they see if it will damage business. i mean, they did a lot of damage to huawei and i think, you know, once again, they might be using this for an alternative mode of here that to me we may see something, maybe a of sanctions come down on some more high tech companies uh, from china, for sure. if you look at the americans, they have a yearly budget of $300000000.00 to offset china and they use it with, you know, a lot of a n t rhetoric uh pieces that continually go

in china, tesla c o u on most plans to make significant investments in india. following talks with the countries prime minister, no range remoted in new york, the move comes as u. s. companies are looking for ways to reduce their reliance on china as a manufacturing hub. in the face of tensions between washington and virginia, amazon hilton, and starbucks are among more than 40 companies that have pledge to hire thousands of refugees in europe. recruiting people fleeing from the war and ukraine and other crisis tricking countries. following russia's invasion, the number of ukraine refugees living in europe stands at almost 6000000. devastating floods, deadly heat waves, wild fires. the effects of climate change are more and more visible every year. to last year, damage from natural disasters totaled an estimated $300000000000.00. where does that money come from? especially for poor countries. many of which are particularly vulnerable to climate change. more than 50 heads of state along with representatives from the world bank and the i enough, are now meeting i

the china in the u. s. stands by the commitments made by president biden, namely, the us does not seek a new cold war. it does not seem to change china system. it's alliances are not directed at china. it does not support taiwan independence and it does not exceed conflict with china. on the other side, the us has slapped sanctions on trains. companies are even pushed allies to restrict the semi conductor attack ex exports to china and even rallied some advanced economies to come to what he sees as pages, economical, colors and, and, and also signed a new trade deal with ty was. so all these actions that have promoted the badging to question the bite and ministration to sarah t president, she said to a secretary blinking back to both of a chinese senior. i'm an employee at wong e and the for a ministration guy had described their talks with blinking as candid in depth and constructive. and he also, uh, be a presence. she also reiterated that the 2 sides have to agree follow through the common understandin

the us know is clearly why there are currently difficulties in military communication between china and the u. s. t u a suited immediately correct. it's incorrect actions. what do you think they mean by that as well? you know, i think it's quite evident, you know, with new guards to what they mean is that they are quite unsatisfied with the way the united states. and of course, the us network defense network, you know, have been significantly solidifying their presence for the stability of their rules based orders. you're aware, china also has a, gets alternative global security initiative, which really 6 to cancel out the us alliance system, particularly in asia. but, you know, we help to understand china, china's logic towards the us and the us alliance is quite contradictory. and why the logical, at some point, you know, we have to understand the countries like manila, no one can force a particular sovereign states to choose sides. but because china has been quite certain, and of course the expansive in terms of its interest, the role of the us as a trusted and responsible security provide

u. s. tech thinks in the state of washington as a heglum on who basically wants to contain china's rise. and as you can see, the perception is really very, very different. and that's a stock discrepancy. i don't think they will find any common ground on those major issues. ok, we only have a half a minute left so i'll be in but the $1000000.00 question, whether a shooting ping will agree to meet blinking. curious about your thoughts on that and what the implications are if the chinese leader chooses not to but just briefly, i would expect he will meet blinking because if he wouldn't, that would be a big diplomatic statement. because just on friday he has met with bill gates and if he would not meet the u. s. foreign minister then yeah, off costs. it is a slip into the face if you allow me to say so, but we don't know yet. we don't have an official confirmation by the time you side yet. many, many things is always savvy and crash for invasion. let's look at some more stories making global headlines at this hour. south africa's president sit around for the has that told russia is vladimir

u. s. and china continued to increase over various issues, including taiwan, secretary banking postponed to trip to beijing in february after the us shut down the chinese spine. but there's no, if the american coast, us officials of flying down to give any major breakthroughs during this visit. i say it's an attempt to reopen the diplomatic channels of what they call a crucial time and relations. china will continue to be around and a major player on the world stage as we are putting ourselves on that stronger footing to compete, that they have and will continue to take provocative steps. we understand that and you've heard the president say it's important to have a diplomacy with world leaders. it's important to have that discussion. so we believe intense competition requires intense diplomacy and that's what you're seeing from the state department. let's get into this with david sacks as a research fellow at the council on foreign relations where he focuses on us china relations. welcome to dw, as 5 years since the us secretary of state visited china during which time relations between th

worldwide building military bases near china, territory and conducting closer can essence off china coast. that's what u. s. has been doing to china as close live now to alex rough pause of 5 logo, and please allow us, i think so. thanks so much for joining us here today of the interesting story this with the western media report in that time in cuba for some sort of deal and basing as well. so i got a spike from the island. what do you make of it? well, let's see how the americans came to this conclusion. how did they hear about this? where did they get the intelligence to tell them that china and the cubans were doing this deal? was it from their own surveillance? i think the americans are a little bit worried here that of course, all nations do have us by program, as angel and merkel, has felt the wrath of the americans surveillance many years ago. but if we look into this, i mean, here are china and the cubans getting together, potentially, allegedly by the americans. they are saying that surveillance is a $2000000000.00 deal in the works. now, what does this mean? does this mean the americans are g

u. s. one china policy that policy has not changed. it's guided by the taiwan relations act, 3 joint communiques, the 6 assurances we do not support, so i want independence. we were made opposed to any unilateral changes to this as quote by either side. we continue to expect the peaceful resolution of prostrate differences. arnie is less flushed out a little bit and clarify with american talks about it's one china policy. and when showing that talks about it's one showing the policy, but not talking about the same thing or the yes and no. so the one china policy is a diplomatic principle. i think that's important, kind of to be aware of the knowledge, the people's republic of china as the sole, legitimate government of china. and that is something the us does. there is no disagreement here between the 2 countries. the united states did not, however, give in to a chinese demands that it's recognized. china is southern and t over at taiwan. so there is a business like the big a fighting point. and the united states reserve the right to m

into negotiations on political topics, but this is probably one of the key points for which china for which uuestions related to military cooperation or not cooperation. well, and also, naturally , the controversy around taiwan is just curious that during the visit of the blinkens china suddenly national defense research institute. taiwan made such a statement of training, which are preparing to implement taiwan with whom let's listen. japan has announced military exercises under the scenario of the crisis in the taiwan strait, which for the third time will be held in tokyo in mid-july 2023. this year they will be expanded for the first time only american and japanese personnel were involved this year. they will include military personnel from taiwan and will be the first american-japanese taiwanese military us japan taiwan exercises will work together to maintain security in the endo -pacific region. so that's the first american japan taiwanese military exercises. well, uh, damn, also, in general, did not keep his mouth shut talking about the military aspects of relations with china. let's l

u. s. shares every value within the font interest, and that is as richard earlier pointed out, all the costs off and the gains china. this is why india and the u. s. we roll out a bunch of agreements of closer cooperation and collaboration because they kind of need each other for geostrategic and national security purposes in the end of a specific. and now, is it all going to be sweet talk, or can we expect fighting to dig into the topics where they're precisely don't agree, like, you know india's relationship with russia and india as a human rights record? yes, i would say i would say yes, this will be on the table and this will be discussed because, you know, president biden ran actually on this agenda, that he will be the one president who addresses human rights violations or a discrimination of minorities, religious minorities, ethnic minorities, is that right that dropped president biden has a long standing very deep and friend relationship personal relations with prime minister more do they know each other really for a long time as president biden was vice president and met mr. moody. then when moti met the p

major beijing has washed out at washington saying that by increasing its military presence near china, the u. s. is instigating a potential conflict, defined expected military conflict where to arise between china and the us. it would not be caused by china taking provocative moves of sending military vessels and jets to a la or anywhere off the coast of california. rather, it would be triggered by us worship or plains close to trying this territory in dealing with the country. the size of china mutual respect is the ground roll. this comes as 0. secretary of st. anthony's blanket is invasion for talks, although he won't be meeting the chinese leader. the journey is where administer the stress that taiwan is at the core of asians interest. the most important issue and the most prominent risk. political analyst alex reporter fee believes that military maneuvers by washington and then china region make lincoln's diplomatic objectives and being redundant. a, it's in a blink of an eye that so much attention. china is going to be put on it. i did not see any red carpet being rolled out for anthon

u. s. for example, excuse us, china of human rights violations. and since young of unfair trade practices, it's also criticized as china for the rest of the evening stands when it comes to the one you crane, etc. and from the chinese perspective, they are, china sees itself as a victim of the us tech sanctions. and also it's um, excuse us, of washington to trying to contain china's rights. and i think both the rhetoric on, on, on washington sites, but also on the aging side does not leave so much room for improvement or compromise. i would say that it's likely that both sides will um, focus on. yeah, not the really major issues, but more on non political issues. for example, the climate talks or also narcotics control. i mean the u. s. also has a pro, a big painting the problem and a lot of the precursors to accommodate you from china before they reached the us. so i think they could um, on those fields maybe reach some small progress. another point of interest to this trip. i do think she's in pain, will agree to meet blinking and what does it me

after china and the u. s. last year we produced 4400000000 metric tons of concrete. according to the us projections, at this rate, we would be producing enough concrete to build the entire city of paris every week for the next 40 years. that is a lot of concrete and for several reasons, this material is not widely recycled. a big one is standardized, bad practices says march. so is there a circular engineer focused on cradle degree to applications in the construction sector? if you will use educational tests are all concrete on people, is why it's good. so april 5th. suppose i use the quantity of the call by not able to use it later. so chip, some plaster makes the concrete and recyclable. but a similar looking silicon base plaster doesn't affect every usability of the concrete or let's look at steel. a universally used material in construction that could have an infinite live cycle. just a simple decision to use bolted connections rather than welded joints would allow the structure to be dismantled, making it easier to we use them it.