garland is telling the truth or the whistleblower is. what kevin mccarthy said was, if it is proven or we do find out substantial evidence that merrick garland lied to congress, then he would begin impeachment proceedings the next day. it feels to me right now that it was a little bit hot right now. passionate anger on the side of the republicans. maybe that will change on wednesday at this hearing. the republicans i'm talking to over the weekend were really fired up about garland. host: our guest is luke broadwater who covers congress for the new york times. we welcome your calls and comments. (202)-748-8000 for democrats. (202)-748-8001 for republicans. for independents and others, (202)-748-8002. you can send us a text if you like, that's at (202)-748-8003. a comment from -- he says that hunter's former business partner will testify under oath. hunter got his vice president dad on the phone 24 times to talk business. guest: my understanding is that the oversight committee has been working for weeks to try and schedule this business pa

it was either merrick garland or someone else is lying and if merrick garland lied before congress, isskyy phone call that trump had that they impeached him over. >> there are so many issues here in play with how the biden family business investigation was handled. so many whistleblowers alleging when they were trying to run down the situation they were blocked by different people. we do definitely have a conflict between what the us attorney weiss has said and what merrick garland has said. they need to clarify, someone's not telling the truth. but the bottom line is we all know what happened here with this investigation was that hunter biden gets a sweetheart deal, they ring up all their political enemies on the slightest of charges, refuse to go after them and to their prentice they give them deals the rest of us would never dream about. >> they were so concerned about the rule of law, trump was the wrecking ball against the rule of law they said. it's sort of a tired talking point but i think it's important. imagine if any of these things happened in the trump administration, it wo

merrick garland is a mob boss lawyer. that's what he is.erson he's protecting is not only his self as he is part of it. because joe biden is running for reelection. i like the way they say trump is running for president so he can pardon himself. joe biden is running for reelection so he doesn't get indicted the department of justice as you can and die a sitting president. joe biden knows that if he stops his immunity in this protection is president he would be facing multiple serious legitimate subsidy felonies. and so will his family members. the same time garland appointed a special counsel to prosecute and make no mistake. in prison for the rest of his life, donald trump. he is covering up for joe biden. he has to pass going, destroy trump, interfere with the election, try to prevent him or any republican from winning the presidency, hurting other republicans, running for election or reelection in the senate and the house of representatives. that is the goal. garland shows jack smith for reason. jack smith is not a real prosecutor, he is

garland publicly said he could have anything he wants. if he wants to prosecute, we'll be able to do that. but is it a misunderstanding if somebody just said that? what's interesting with this is, the i.r.s. agents took notes of the meetings because it would be a misunderstanding if someone just said that and you passed by and that was the end of it. but the i.r.s. agent asked it's i.r.s. asked david weiss to read the question because of what he said he thought was so important. and retold that, no, i was denied being a special prosecutor. and then the notes were taken back. a question was asked again, notes were taken back and sent to everybody at the meeting. so it's very hard to me, of all meetings i've been in, if someone says one thing to me, it's very important, so i asked, did i hear it right, and you come back with the exact same thing, i take notes about it and i send it to all of you. so i go back to you. do you think that's a misunderstanding? in your meetings when you talk to me, you take notes, right? are you recording any ri

if it's merrick garland at the d.o.j.able offense and republicans are considering impeaching merrick garland and hesitation among several republicans who think it's not the responsibility to wait into these affairs. my question what are republicans going to grow a spying and hold these officials accountable. we've been debating several impeachments of capita officials including mayorkas and anthony blinken over the afghanistan withdrawal and now merrick garland, let's get some action going and do something about this and hold these people accountable. maria: kevin mccarthy did remark about this america first legal merrick garland and the justice department that the d.o.j. failed to enforce a foreign agent registration act for hunter biden. afl said they have a legal obligation requiring hunter register because his involvement with reasonable holdings when he joined the board back in 2014. he also avoided registering in 2017 litigation political activities in the u.s. on behalf of chinese energy company cef c. house republ

talking to merrick garland, your calling for special counsel to probe mr.rick, what are you hoping to achieve? what are you looking for? >> the purpose of a special counsel is the department of justice unable to investigate the matter fairly itself because of conflict of interest or political bias or another issue. in this instance we have not one but two separate irs whistleblowers who have come forward, both senior career irs employees who alleged merrick garland deliberately and directly interfered and blocked the investigation and the hunter biden and most specifically intervened to protect joe biden, to shield off the white house among other things, demanding no questions be asked about the big guy, the money, millions of dollars flowing to joe biden, d.o.j. was not allowed to examine that. i can tell you if what the irs whistleblowers are saying is true, merrick garland is guilty of multiple felonies, lying under oath to congress, specifically when i questioned him and in response to my questions he committed judiciary committee there was no political

garland says he never did that. part of this is how incomplete an explanation garland provided us when we asked him that question. >> in my hand i have my own marked-up version of the print edition of "the new york times" which contains infamous paragraph number 21. quote, that episode was confirmed independently to "the new york times" by a person with knowledge of the situation. what exactly did you confirm? >> we confirmed -- i am not going to go much beyond what we wrote. but i will tell you that the general sense that we have is that he approached the prosecutor in southern california with a request to partner and was denied. that is the alpha to omega of what we know and what we have reported thus far. we are continuing to -- >> okay. that seems to support what -- it seems to support what shapley has said, which is that at this meeting on october 7, 2022, weiss comes in and says, look, i am not the decisionmaker here. >> it doesn't support that at all. it supports this one fairly narrow aspect of the story. lo

their allegations again are directly contrary to what merrick garland has said under oath.this is something i have talked about at great length on my podcast verdict with ted cruz. you look at these whistleblowers. both of them are career irs employees. gary shapley was a senior supervisory agent with a lot of experience. he has no reason that is evident on the record to live. he doesn't appear to be a republican. the other whistleblower is self-described as a gay democrat with a man for a husband. there is no reason to think he has an ax to grind with joe biden yet he has the courage to call this out. we need a special counsel because the attorney general is not above the law and neither is joe biden. >> i hope you keep your foot on the gas. i agree completely. thank you so much. >>> the biden administration has unveiled a weak plan to tackle the drug crisis. sara carter will join us from san francisco with a shocking report. first we will have live audience shows tomorrow, thursday night. you can join us. some in studio guests. tickets are free. hannity.com is where you r

i trust these whistleblowers far more than i trust the attorney general merrick garland. we ought to be doing is subpoenaing everybody. every single documents, every deposition especially hunter biden yesterday for anything that there is because what we have learned is the d.o.j. has been complicit and has been covering up this investigation pretty heard from the irs whistleblower this weekend. what i want to do is cult merrick garland, the attorney general pretty want to happen to congress under oath and ask him if he voted for the code red. the more we learn about this, the worse it gets. i think this is going to go down is where the most corrupt president most corrupt administration in u.s. history. i cannot express how angry i am. the more that i learned about this the part worse it gets and the fact they were blocking this investigation of corruption and money laundering, literally the biden family sold our country out. it is unbelievable in obscene and every american should be angry about this. maria: house oversight committees uncovered a whole host of evidence and

that means he reports to garland. that's what i'm saying by the deal they were going to give this man, nobody in america would get. they were going to absolve them of every crime as they went through a diversion program and crimes we are dealing with foreign governments, to or the interest of united states taking money from communist china pray that the almost went through, and if we allow the same group to come back to the same judge and do it all over again, we have made a serious mistake. >> sean: all the money that they are finding, the shell corporations they've got all the suspicious activity reports. as they now follow the money and the tens of millions of dollars, we do not have a final figure. how much money in business deals that the biden family did with china, russia, kazakhstan, ukraine, romania, mexico, a dozen more countries but what were they paying for considering at that time we are told that hunter was addicted to crack and had no experience in energy? what did we learn from that? what is the messag

we have to get to the truth because merrick garland is clearly part of the cover-up. he will not do his job then we have a duty to do it for him and that is over going to do an oversight. steve. maria: eric congressman will watch you work think you're being as we can. >> thank you, maria as always and happy fourth of july to everyone. maria: into happy independence weakened. you never show inflation is cooling but david bahnsen there's a key factor of the economy everybody should be paying more attention too. that is next but nfl greats troy aikman want you to know about your beer this holiday you got this. let's go. gobble gobble. i've seen bigger legs on a turkey! rude. who are you? i'm an investor in a fund that helps advance innovative sports tech like this smart fitness mirror. i'm also mr. leg day...1989! anyone can become an agent of innovation with invesco qqq, a fund that gives you access to nasdaq-100 innovations. i go through a lot of pants. before investing carefully read and consider fund investment objectives, risks, charges, expenses and more in prospec

quickly to garland. simple question, garland.did yo it's the same question.you sign the commission? you say he had the authority. did you? did you think that he actually you could do it oralloy ? yeah. so it's all right, congressman. the letter that wa, it's v s sentt to senator graham noting this ongoing investigation, we keep talkinatorm nog about. here's how msnbc spun us. watch. t >> he's saying that flat out that this was not politically>> interfered by garland. nobody from the administration. he went where he needed to go. he charged nee what he thoughtt could charge and that this deal that he made, this plea deal i s, not a sweetheart deal, as republicans and this whistleblower ar re, ken?in >> well, we'd all like him to be that candid. he's constrained . be th the investigation remains open. so he's not saying all those things he's. o ag here we go again, congressman. the investigation is ongoing or' you can't say this because the things aren't true, which is it? well, first of all, it's it is a sweetheart deal because any othe it. all ar would have c

now, likewise, just as with merrick garland, the house should have an inquiry.oe biden deserves a chance to present a defense to argue it's not true. it hasn't been proven, these are allegations. maria: democrats blocked your amendment this week to the national defense authorization act. it would have allowed service members who were dismissed for not getting the covid-19 vaccine to be reinstated or to have their discharge status changed. why did democrats block this amendment? >> it's infuriating. there are at least 8,400 servicemen and women when were discharged from the military because they declined to get the covid vaccine. the democrats are happy with that. now, last year we successfully ended the covid vaccine mandate in the military. that's manager i've been leading the fight for -- something i've been leading the fight for for a long time. that was a major victory. but that's only prospective. that's for servicemen and women today. we've got a huge recruiting problem in the military. the woke policies of the biden administration are causing young men an

yeah when senator joe grassley asked attorney general merrick garland in 2023 garland testified the unitedstates attorney has been advised they have full authority to make the roads you are talking about when to bring cases in other districts when he needs to do that he should be advised that he should get anything he need. after the october seven redline meeting, there was no way to reconcile attorney general weiss's statement, his office's actions, with attorney general garland's public testimony . it i am 100 present service that the delaware political office so approval from the democratic nominees. new york times reported that independently -- charges in california. plenty of other witnesses are familiar with the facts, in addition to those who witnessed attorney general weiss's private emission. i encourage them to step forward and tell the truth about what happened in what they heard. let me be clear, although these facts contradict attorney general garland's testimony in raise very problems for his. i never claimed to have evidence that attorney general garland knowingly lied to co

merrick garland.s, breitbart reporter emma jo morris on censoring her factual reporting on the biden laptop right before election 2020 the along with "the wall street journal"'s kim strassel on politics at the fbi. meanwhile, new bank records and whistleblower testimony show biden and family took in millions of dollars from foreigners while he was vice president allegedly in exchange for u.s. policy decisions. stunning allegations, yet the doj is still squarely focused on stopping donald trumpment as the gloves come off between the two likely 2024 contenders. >> he's a corrupt man. he's a corrupt president. he's grossly incompetent. and the reason i ask, because they actually indicted an opponent who was the president of the united states. i got indicted. maria: part two of my exclusive interview with former president donald j. trump right here coming up. it's all right here, right now on "sunday morning futures." ♪ ♪ maria: we begin this sunday morning with the most significant charges ever leved aga

which is what garland said, he always had it, i gave it to him.wasn't written authorization, he says he talked with somebody at doj, who did you talk to about it? they need to be asked the questions. >> laura: we need answers. leslie wolf, as well, add to the list. sol, excellents analysis. the hunter mess is not even a day old, msnbc and cnn were pining to move on. >> we are on indictment watch. >> we begin with breaking news on the investigation surrounding former president donald trump. >> a secret meeting sets off alarms across the political and legal world. >> indictment on charges related to january sic and attempt to overturn the election could be handed up at any moment today. >> laura: they are so giddy. lawyers did meet with special counsel jack smith in dc today regarding the indictment relatocha scott-bivensed to the january 6 investigation. there is no indictment yet, they did get their distraction issue reported just moments ago, the doj added new charges related to trump's retention of classified document. here is member of the judi

it'stime for impeachment, not just for merrick garland but all the way up the ranks but merrick garlandain sight. they're trying to create charges against president trump that aren't felonies. we have felonies in plain sight that the doj and merrick garland is not doing anything about. cheryl: the allegation is of special treatment. i want to ask you about this, one of your colleagues on the democrat side, this is house oversight ranking member jamie raskin, he says there's unverified claims in the newly released fbi document which alleges that joe and hunter biden coerced a burisma executive into paying $5 million. this is the form we talked so much about. he claims that these were already investigated by the trump doj and that bill barr, remember, he's debunked all of that like a month ag ago, bill r came on and said we passed it along, we did keep the investigation going. your reaction? >> look, we have special counsels all over the place looking at this and now the whole concern is do we appoint another special counsel just to slow it down and not get to the point of what's happenin

merrick garland, are you proud of thisociety?s christopher wrar you proud? mr. higher honor. james comeayy signed three ofsin the pfizer warrants when none of the informationin you gave was verifiable, says verified at the top of the warrantverifiab, you proud? tonight, under garland's disgraceful partisan leadershitp ,the doj has now gone from bad f to worse. any trust inro the department of justice has now been shattered. and yet, merrick garlandand no, seems to care less. doesn't seem to care at all. but let not all.t your heartst e be troubled. if any charges against hunter ever make their wa y. garland's partisan doj, the white house press secretary, has assured us that joe will not offer hunter a single pardon. take a look. >> i know you said not a lot of change since yesterday and as a personal matter, but from a presidential perspective, is there any possibility that the would end up pardoning his son? you know what i just said? >> no, i just answer. go ahead. go ahead. >> just like when she swore that president biden had no involvemen just with her son's business dea

david, will garland meet the deadline? >> hi, mike, we don't know exactly what the attorney general will say or staff will say. we are told there will be a response, a source familiar tells me it's unlikely the attorney general will allow 11 people allowed in the hunter biden probe to testify because it's an active probe, active until the judge signs and seals and delivers the plea deal on paper. he will appear in federal court on july 26th. house judiciary chairman jim jordan, oversight chair james comer, and jason smith want garland to make available the 11 people connected, including attorney weiss, the donald trump appointed attorney gone on the record in three letters, one letter to your next guest, senator lindsey graham, to say he's been in charge of the probe despite claims from a whistleblower who claims weiss said the opposite. and leslie wolf and u.s. attorney matthew graves, runs the attorney's office in d.c. and the whistleblower said he was not able to charge hunter biden, and weiss said i was assured i would

garland is not like that. and it is possible that he was not aware of some of these controversies but that itself is a problem. these are major questions that congress is looking at. you have discussions of impeachment. you have allegations of bribery. and garland has been largely absent without leave. to some extent the court may take time. the court may just grant this plea bargain, but in some ways it is no longer going to be a clear benefit for hunter biden. he is about to get the benefit of a sweetheart deal. it will make it more difficult down the road because this is basically the heart of the allegations that he was cut an incredibly generous deal despite evidence and despite the views of prosecutors and investigators. banking that deal is going to cost later as they go into what looks like an impeachment inquiry. >> bill: andy mccarthy joins the conversation now. welcome always we await what happens inside the courtrooms. trying to figure it out. there are no cameras inside there today. the last point

and his attorney general, merrick garland, make sure that mr. weiss, appointed by donald trump, have full authority and resources to pursue this probe however he saw fit in any district in the country, and in the past few weeks, as hunter biden accepted a guilty plea, the president and his attorney general have done nothing to interfere with the case which is overseen by a federal judge appointed by, yes, donald trump. can you imagine donald trump saying nothing about a witch hunt, not trying to quash the prosecution if it were his son being prosecuted? indeed, the traditional and scrupulous respect stands in sharp contrast to trump's spectacular disrespect for the rule of law and his serial efforts both in office and outside office to get prosecutors to go after and lock of his political rivals and to suspend accountability and specific criminal cases when it comes to his friends. when michael flynn was investigated for lying to the fbi and later convicted for it about communicating with the russians or when paul manafort was investigated and l

merrick garland should be impeached immediately and the judge shouldn't sign off on the hunter bidenwhat do we do to follow up on this to follow up? >> the chairman also confirmed that not only was this separate investigation conducted by the irs with a confirmed money received by foreign entities. china, ukraine, romania. and it was stated that we have received bank transactions from ukraine. that's going to be the next step in the investigation. i could not agree further that there needs to be i believe impeachment of the individuals that are involved in regards to obstructing this investigation as well as the fact that hunter biden's plea deal is nothing more than a sweetheart deal, as you saw, it's not a partisan investigation. from what we are seeing with information brought forward, he's also potentially guilty of violating the mann act, something from presented of marjorie taylor greene brought up when she proved hunter biden had been engaged in not only human trafficking but across straight lines -- state lines. >> jesse: if you can escort a plane fee to fly halfway across th

this guy garland lied to congress, and garland has obstructed justice.right there, he should be impeached. i didn't know this, but this guy, mr. x, great name. [laughter] mr. x, he was not told to look into hunter. he stumbled upon hunter when he was looking into some international porn investigation and noticed hunter was buying escorts and hunter was using his bank as basically an escort slush fund. and his corporate bank account as an escort slush fund. that sets alarm bells off with tax investigators that something is fishy. that is when he looked into it. and then he tried to bring the case to washington, d.c., and they move the case from d.c. to delaware and the minute it gets to delaware, everything goes wrong. the tires start flying off, you know, the buttons stop working. they drag this thing out like crazy. now, i just remember when they tried to nail trump for obstructing a crime he didn't commit, remember they wanted to charge him with obstruction? he handed over every single document. they interviewed him. the interview to his son, his daugh

garland said weiss has authority.nse attorney weiss said he has been assured he would get authority. if he never requested special 30 from attorney general garland as on october 7, the american public deserves to hear why he allowed 2014 and 2015 d.c. charges to expire. note number of carefully worded denials or evolving half-truths can overshadow the stark fact. nice it's attorney weiss and garland would be sitting toward these committees one day. they will have to admit despite all the absolute fact is this case was presented to presidentially appointed u.s. attorneys in d.c. and california that no charges were brought in those districts tells you everything that you need to know. i don't claim to be privy to nice its attorney weiss attorney general garland's communications. 9 cents attorney weiss told us he was not the deciding person he had requested was denied special 30 after d.c. decline charges. and california declined to havei to request special authority again. ire understood the gravity of those admissions.

you expecting merrick garland will be impeach?y vote for that, i'm not in charge of investigating merrick garland if they can prove is been dishonest with the american people and led a two-tiered system of justice i think we will certainly have a vote. >> what happens now? >> another thing it shows the department of justice to the scales and obstructed justice. the department of justice obstructed justice whether merrick garland or the united states attorney in the district or somebody else that's what happened now we have a separate investigation, how far that leads to merrick garland it does require impeachment. i have articles of impeachment drafted for merrick garland for other issues regarding weaponize d.o.j. again spirits. but that being said this "other langford impeachments enter impeachment not only for the department of justice but joe biden. maria: thank you for being here scott. joining us. were getting started in the extraordinary story continues. president biden touting his bidenomics plan in the american people are

i should say merrick garland.nk he will approve this request to speak to david weiss to get his first-hand account of how serious this investigation is or ever was in to hunter biden? >> well, if past is prolog, they're going to say they're still trying to negotiate a solution. that's what we saw in connection with one of the other house committees had with fbi director wray. but i think the idea here is, march that we'd like to think hoff ourselves as a rule of law society. this is mainly politics. the question is what are they willing to do? are they willing to hold him in contempt, garland and weiss if he doesn't appear? >> martha: kevin mccarthy weighed in on that moments ago. the clock is ticking. we'll see what he decides to do. thanks, andy. >> thanks, martha. >> martha: the potential election scenario that is being called the biden debacle waiting to happen and why it has left demanding new -- demanded new action from the white house on watching out for the president. kayleigh mcenany standing by. >> you c

garland has told congress and the american people something different. so i would think given all that information, you are just as inquisitive as i am. who is lying in this conversation? the role of congress especially from the legislative purpose to have an investigation is there something we need to change legislatively? if we find that there is why is going on, that would rise to an impeachment inquiry where we would be, as a congress, strongerco in power to give all the answers and yes, i would move to impeachment inquiry if i found that the attorney general has not only lied to the congress and the senate but to america. >> thank you mr. speaker. once they reach conference what is your view concerning the reconcile amendment? >> i don't see that it's hard to reconcile. it's what's hard to reconcile is that you don't focus on [inaudible] i've watched the democrats within the majority spend a lot of money in the defense department on things that have nothing to do with training our women and men. we have reframed and changed back to a way that made a

because that was a discretionary call by merrick garland. take that position. and i thought to myself, if morality and decency doesn't enter into these discretionary decisions, then we are really in trouble on the law enforcement front, at the department of justice. i am thrilled. we'll file this under the better late than never category. the doj has reversed course and done what i believe is the right thing. both legally and morally. >> i mean, glenn, let me follow up quickly. why do you think they reached that decision in the first place? the original one before today's reversal? >> to protect future presidents against similar claims if those claims are frivolous, if they're not fact-based, if they are nefariously launched. but that doesn't really absolve you of responsibility to do the right thing in each individual instance. so i think doj got this wrong. i think they believed they were protecting presidents in the future from similar allegations being frivolous allegations. but you have to do the right thing in each instance. >> i want

merrick garlands. we were not called on today.but she did try to get clarity about the shifting answers around biden's prior claims that he has never spoken to his son about his overseas business dealings. >> earlier this week, you said the president was never in business with his son can you say specifically the president didn't have discussions with hunter about his business dealings? >> i was asked this question multiple times monday. nothing has changed. i don't anything to add to what i stated monday. >> she says nothing has changed the language has changed. it's the difference between no knowledge and no involvement. that question like so many others, martha, remains unanswered. >> martha: it's great to see your answer hasn't changed and change your and and expect that you're not going to get questions about it. jacqui, thanks very much. good to have you. so let's go to clay travis who joins me now. so clay, welcome. great to have you. the question of impeachment, people measure it against what we saw with president trump, p

there are efforts to impeach merrick garland not going to fly in the senate is it? >> well we -- i think house should hold impeachment hearings against mayorkas, garland, antony blinken, lied to my congressional investigators said never email hunter biden so i think the hearings in the house would be informative how american public understands the truth needs to be imposed. >> extraordinary fox business white house correspondent edward lawrence asked white house press secretary karine jean-pierre about tightening of "bidenomics," this happened yesterday watch this. >> the first year presidency, why now rolled out next year? voters begin to vote for -- >> we have historical pieces of legislation i talked about insulin, 35 bucks, for seniors that is something able to pass last year in inflation reduction act, lower cost for energy healthcare, actions that the president did, this is what we talk about "bidenomics". >> senator she has talking points there on "bidenomics," how do you see it? >> well, almost every policy this administration pushed is further weakened this

that's what merrick garland wakes up to do every single day. a travesty, laura, he should go, and we need find out joe biden is this guy a crook? this is an answer the american people deserve to get the result to. >> laura: senator, very quickly. politico is reporting tonight that the white house is very worried about senator mcconnell's possible health problems given what happened yesterday's because they would essentially lose an ally in their work to try to block donald trump. they said having spent years as one of the party's chief villains, mcconnell in the biden era has become something different, a safeguard, essentially, against a senate turning into a version of the chaotic house g.o.p. senator, do we really think republican voters want someone leading the senate who is closer to biden than trump? >> well, i certainly don't. and i can tell you what the house has the senate doesn't. the house has what is called a majority. the republicans are in charge in the house. they are not in charge in the senate. and i to say to senate leadership

yeah. >> sorry, sorry -- >> no worries. >> i think what merrick garland's really trying to lay out isng if an attack at the doj, as we've seen, i agree with everything that haze laid out. but i would likely at the the point, hayes brown, that -- maga individuals. and you see it time and time again. they are repeating this rhetoric. i think merrick garland is trying to remind everyone, that just because you want something to happen it doesn't mean that it falls within the right of the law. and it doesn't mean that it will help uphold our institution for our people. i think there is an impatience on the side of the democrats because they want merrick garland to essentially prosecute donald trump for his crimes and misdemeanors, and his children as well. but i think he is also saying that we lay out everything. we have to understand that we don't want to be this hyper partisan institution, when we are dealing with such hyper partisan, on the republican side and hysteria when they just want to start prosecuting the president. his son, whomever they disagree with. >> hayes, let's switch ge

so far, garland is not giving in.avid spunt joins us from the justice department tonight hi, david. >> hi, gillian, good evening. we are waiting to hear what that decision is from the attorney general. i'm told a decision has been made. there are still some discussions going on and a response is being worked on. perhaps we are waiting for that to get over to capitol hill before we can actually see a copy of that written response to a request for the attorney general to make roughly a dozen people connected to the hunter biden probe available for transcribed interviews. house judiciary chairman jim jordan oversight chair james comer and ways and means chair jason smith wrote to garland and the head of the irs and secret service two weeks ago asking them to make 11 people available including david weiss the trump appointed u.s. attorney in delaware who has gone on the record in three different letters to congress to say that he has been in charge of the hunter biden probe despite claims from an irs whistleblower who ins

did you see the dome of agha imam reza's garland? you are not the same mr. seyed, except he is the caravan of other caravans of simple and non-sadat pilgrims on the occasion of eid al-ghadir to visit sadat hosseini. write how many times the body of a 250-year-old man was buried in mashhad, iran . director of karamat razavi foundation. astan quds will be brought to mashhad al-reza, the head of the household must be over 35 okay, to you, who has not been able to take over suleimanzadeh of the radio and television news agency, i spoke to many people, but i was not with the people, well, with your reports, there is the star of the earth , this is the most important area of ​​change in the vaccine institute , theses and strategies, and the horizons of the free consumption zone. let's do it for the children under performance and evaluation and judging with you on the first page every night at 19:30 on the khabar network, download aram, the best low-fat yogurt from ranchers , delicious starter yogurt from morning to 16, with ranchers , pakshuma washing machine, equ

he has never communicated with the justice department about it because merrick garland was appointednd decided to distance himself from the case to by appointing jack smith, who has full authority to prosecute or not prosecute donald trump. president biden is completely sealed off from this case, but that does not prevent don't trump's criminal defense lawyers from lying about that. they got their first taste of what it was like to lie directly to the judge today and get away with it. judge cannon considered each side's arguments about scheduling a trial date, but did not make a decision about a trial date in the courtroom today. joining us now is -- he is a senior legal correspondent for the messenger and was in the courtroom today. also with us as bradley moss, a national security attorney who represents the intelligence community. andrew weissmann is also back with us. adam, that lasted about an hour and 45 minutes. what were the high points, and where does it go from here? >> well, one of the high points was something that you pointed out, lawrence, it was a very clashing moment

but if you read very carefully weiss's letter he corroborates garland's story under over merrick garlandaid at least seven times i have not interfered. weiss said yes that's true about you if you read carefully he points to attorneys in california and in dc who would not let him bring the charges. who do they report to? they report to merrick garland. was there a silent understanding they wouldn't bring the charges. i want to hear from those us attorneys they need to go before congress and sans questions. because you have six people in that meeting, gary shapley highly credible contemporaneous notes his boss signed off on the e-mail corroborating the events i fbi agents were in that meeting too and they were like does this sound like you does it sound like what we heard? sounds like what we heard. so then weiss comes out friday and says i can do whatever i want in delaware. really? so he wanted special counsel status in order to be able to do it anywhere he wanted to. merrick garland day before or two days before said, no, he didn't need special counsel status, help the same status. he d