certainly, us recently resigned us department of justice. special council robot has confirmed joe biden mishandled classified documents. this person has no face, any charges, disliked his fee, just as a dog from being prosecuted in a similar case. have listened to some of the highlights of the or for defending his investigation for the house. i saw her produce the 345 page report, but in the end it boils down to a few key facts. joe biden kept classified information. joe biden failed to properly secure classified information, and joe biden shared classified information with people he wasn't supposed to go by and broke the law. because he's forgetful old man who would appear sympathetic to a jury. mister her chose not to bring charges. february 8, the white house question, mister president, why did you share classified information with your ghostwriter? the president? i did not share classified information. i did not share it. i guarantee i did not. that's not true. is it mr. her? that is inconsistent with the findings based on the evidence. and i'm in my report, she has a lies just with

that are made and profits on us was i thought i started says i'm out to the us as the department of justice special council robot has come from. joe biden mishandled classified documents. now the us president has not the face any charges, despite his treat this as a donald trump being also good or just a buzz who's in a similar case. uh, how about us into some of the highlights of the defending his investigation before the house for her produce the 345 page report us, but in the end it boils down to a few key facts. joe biden kept classified information. joe biden failed to properly secure classified information, and joe biden shared classified information with people who wasn't supposed to go by and broke the law. because he is forgetful old man who would appear sympathetic to a jury. mister her chose not to bring charges. february 8, the white house question, mister president, why did you share classified information with your ghostwriter? the president did not share classified information. i did not share, and i guarantee i did not. that's not true, isn't mr. her that is inconsistent with the findings b

justice department and the f. b. i being accused of failing to oppose their own missions when it came to the russia gate scandal. with this was the view of the justice department's own special council, a judge later, throughout the murder investigation, when it says that there was this profile, and that was linked to russia and the judge said, well, you haven't provided any evidence. you can make an ass cetacean, you can say anything you liked, but there was no concrete evidence in your report. and this is another report back in 2019 to show the actually, there is a link between these 2 things. and you've got evidence that russia was really behind this. and then of course we have the full re surrounding the clintons. the ad leaking claims that the trump organization, back in 2016 was in touch with the russian bank. these links of the 2 things, again, rushes in the head with a, with trump. this turned out to be hillary's own campaign listing this ins mation. the fact that a what was being alleged was entirely false. so there was so much evidence to show how time and time again, allegations has been pushed towards russia and they've all been fund wanting when it comes to evidence. al

robert hur would be up here is a private citizen and not as astic member of the department of justice or as special council when he's aru private citizen? he's a republican. and what did robert hur get? he got coaching from trump world. that seems prett.y suspicious to me. if you are going into a hearing where you want to seam aboveboard and nonpartisan, why are you getting counseled by the former presidents people and wh aren't you showing up as ath representative of the department of justice? [ simultaneous talking ] >> one of the people who coache him as no one abc analyst. >> the only thing i saw on twitter was her saying that's not true.pend >> all of these sources are wrong?ome [ simultaneous talking ] >> how come nobody brought that up? >> i don't know why no one brought that up but it was theit biggest story. >> so he was there not as a private citizen now? he >> i'm not saying that. >> what i totally missed is that trump world coached him.e sa you are saying sarah is.only the only thing i saw is her denying it. >> night -- >> did we get off track here?a: >> no, this is important. n while the gop g

of the conversation with special council robert hur. lawmakers say they subpoenaed the attorney general to provide the materials on a number of occasions but were refused justice departments documents and special council interviews has lit toll do with gop impeachment i nquiries and republicans are now deciding whether to move forward with a resolution and holds garland in contempt to the full house floor. stu. stuart: thanks, ashley. later, we have king charles n amed prince william of colonel in chief of army air corp.. that's prince harry's old military regiment. that's a slap in the face to harry. we have it covered. president biden pledged over a trillion to fund infrastructure and green energy projects but only spent a small portion of the money. is he going on a spending blitz before the election? we have a report from the white house next. stuart: show me bitcoin. around 62, 61,000, 16.9 at the moment and donald trump said he's now accepting crypto donations and if you're in favor of crypto in any form, you'd better vote trump. okay. that's endorsement i guess. time is running out for president biden to distribution taxpayer money he's earmarked for climate and i

this is what the ultimate report from the us department of justice had to say about the story of trump. russia collusion completely to box. the special councils investigation did not find that the trump campaign, or any one associated with it, conspired or coordinated with russia and its efforts to influence the 2016 us presidential election. and then there was james clapper, right? james clapper from the office of the director of national intelligence. he went around to other intelligence officials and had them sign a letter saying that the 100 buying laptop story was russian. this information and a number of former intelligence officials basically sign this letter urging the american people not to believe the hunter, laptops story that undermines laptop with some kind of fictitious russian propaganda. well, it turned out the 100 by the laptop story was indeed real. the laptop existed, the contents of the laptop were not misrepresented. it was a true story, but the intelligence community was mobilized to urge the american public to ignore it. this is all the james clamber, a former director of national intelligence, had to say about that. th

department of justice. and it just is in striking contrast to the trump administration, where they appointed the department of justice appointed a special counsel and basically every single day that that councilre was the constant threat that donald trump would get rid of the special counsel. so it's just remarkable how different the two justice departments are behaving. that was my take on what i was thinking about, the insurrection charge that was raised in the oral arguments today. >> let me also ask you about the other thing that came up i think a bit awkwardly in that exchange between the justice and the lawyer, which was this question of immunity. obviously the supreme court, within just the next days, is going to consider whether or not to leave standing that this ruling this or donald trump doesn't have immunity from prosecution. i think, i mean, i don't know, i think the common wisdom is that they won't take it up, but also that the circuit courts ruling against trump is not in much danger. again, it's a peanut gallery. who knows? we'll see how it goes once the court makes its own decision. do you think there's any interplay for the justices, between what they handled today, this iss

department of justice. and it just is in striking contrast to the trump administration, where they appointed the department of justice appointed a special counsel and basically every single day that that council existed there was the constant threat that donald trump would get rid of the special counsel. so it's just remarkable how different the two justice departments are behaving. that was my take on what i was thinking about, the insurrection charge that was raised in the oral arguments today. >> let me also ask you about the other thing that came up i think a bit awkwardly in that exchange between the justice and the lawyer, which was this question of immunity. obviously the supreme court, within just the next days, is going to consider whether or not to leave standing that this ruling this or donald trump doesn't have immunity from prosecution. i think, i mean, i don't know, i think the common wisdom is that they won't take it up, but also that the circuit courts ruling against trump is not in much danger. again, it's a peanut gallery. who knows? we'll see how it goes once the court makes its own decision. do you think there's any interplay for the justices, between what they handled tod

this is what the ultimate report from the us department of justice had to say about the story of trump rush inclusion completely to box the special councils investigation. didn't find that the trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with russia and its efforts to influence the 2016 us presidential election. and then there was james clapper, right? james clapper from the office of the director of national intelligence. he went around to other intelligence officials and had him sign a letter saying that the 100 buying laptop story was russian. this information and a number of former intelligence officials basically sign this letter urging the american people not to believe the hunter, laptops story that undermines laptop with some kind of fictitious russian propaganda. well, it turned out the 100 by the laptop story was indeed real. the laptop existed, the contents of the laptop were not. miss representative was a true story. but the intelligence community was mobilized to urge the american public to ignore it. this is all the james clamber, a former director of national intelligence, had to say about that. th

last august, former president trump was charged with 4 accounts of conspiracy and instruction by the justice department, special council jack smith today. and then dining room was on sealed. charging donald j trump, with conspiring to defraud the united states, conspiring to disenfranchise voters state, conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceedings. but trump legal team argues who should be protected by presidential immunity. the claim, many legal experts are skeptical about he doesn't have any text in the constitution to rely on, and that's significant because the constitution does grant and unity explicitly to members of the legislature. but it doesn't mention the president, according to his lawyers from who is acting within his official responsibility was president when he ledger lead tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election. they say no president and us history was ever prosecuted for his official act. and neither should, from what the case goes beyond, followed from if the supreme court ruled that the president doesn't have immunity from prosecution, many fear it could open the door to cr

of attention in washington today. the justice department finally releasing the highly anticipated transcripts of biden's interview with a special councilhur who testified this morning, and we will get to that in a minute. but first, five hours of biden unscripted. our producers spent all day reading this and now we understand what robert hur meant when he called biden painfully slow. the transcript confirmed that biden did not remember when his son died, when he was vise president or when trump was elected. biden had to be reminded multiple times throughout his interview what a facts machine was. and whenever he was right -- redirected to focus on the question at hand, he would launch into waukee stories weirder than corn pop. for instance, when the special council asked why he moved classified documents from the naval observatory, biden claimed he'd won and international towards competition in law school and then sherrod a story of a 23-year-old who was wearing the wrong pants, wrong genes when a spark caught fire and he lost one of his testicles. biden called himself a frustrated architect who went to mongolia where he shot bowen arr

. >>> welcome back to all of you watching us here in the united states, canada, and around the world. this is cnn news room. the u.s. justice department's special council says joe biden won't face any criminal charges for his mishandling of classify documents but the report includes concerns about his age and mental sharpness that didn't go over well with the u.s. president. he said his memory is fine and such extraneous commentary didn't belong in the report. president biden added i did not break the law period. and the matter is now closed. >>> joining me now from new york, is criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor bernard. thanks for being with us. so let's start with the documents probe. the special council side biden willfully retained and disclosed national security information. so why wasn't president biden charged but donald trump was? >> good morning, thank you for having me, so in terms of why president biden is not going to be charged you have to think as a former prosecutor, you have to think whether you can prove your case beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury. technically, if you were prosecutor and you are not able to prove the ca

than the entire department of justice provided during the course of the trump administration and produced the transcript itself of the president's conversation with the special council. the reasons house republicans offered for purposes of their request for the audio were clearly a smoke screen for a political exercise. they wanted to use them for a campaign commercial. the president evoked executive privilege and republicans in the house know that to be the case, but they proceeded anyway. it is shameful and disgraceful and we'll have to see what comes next. >> two things i want to note here. representative david joyce of ohio, the republican who voted against it said as a former prosecutor i cannot support a resolution that would further politicize the judicial system. enough is off in. second of all, i just want to make sure i have the events here right. merrick garland appoints a special council to investigate the president. the man he appoint is a republican who is a donald trump appointee in the justice department. this individual asked for an interview with the president voluntarily complies with for nine hours despite the fact that donald trump never gave an

justice department, remember that case was dismissed, the justice department is appealing that because they think the judge was completely wrong when she ruled that the doj's method of appointing special councils honest -- unconstitutional. it is not clear if they intend to prosecute these under wings long enough to try to win that appeal before the circuit court, and donald trump could always pardon those individuals before the court rules or orders his justice department withdrawal. what happens in that case is very much up in the air.>> thank you. barrett smith did leave the door open after trump is out of office, but do you see realistically, four years from now, trump is out of office, so prosecutors will revive the case? >> the special counsel did dismiss these charges without charges, which means he will keep the door open to potentially file charges in the future continuing these, i think there's two main issues, the first is the statute of limitations, it would have to be told, smith's filings did not say anything about the statute of limitations, did not weigh in one way or the other, whether these would be told during those four years, but the second issue is a practical one, that i

terrorists coming across, we have a president that according to the special council, appointed by president biden's department of justice. he can't remember important dates and is a feeble old man who can't be prosecuted. that should scare every american citizen and everyone around the world frankly. elizabeth: half of democrats are worried about the mental capacity to run the nation, guy. let's watch president biden's gaffe about mineron and white house press secretary karine jean-pierre. >> i sat down and said america is back. mineron from germany, i mean france looked at me and said, said, no, why -- how long you back for? >> how is president biden ever going to convince three quarters of voter who is are worried about his physical and mental health that he's okay even though in las vegas he told the story about recently talking to a french president who died in 1996? >> i'm not even going to go down tafanely rabbit hole with you, sir? >> what's a rabbit hole? elizabeth: guy, we don't mean -- wish any ill on anybody, any human being if they have to have a severe mental limitations and shouldn't voters be told about t

special council, congress can pass a statute creating a special council office. congress did not do that. congress let the old office of independent council office lapse and so the justice department an enroute. stuart: in your view, is this lawfare tactic by the biden administration, has it failed completely? >> it has backfired and backfired spectacular reigns leading on president biden. the attorney general, merrick garland, jack smith and the biden democrat prosecutors around the country. the american people not biden democrats get to pick our next president. stuart: what about the new york, the new york criminal case. i know that's being delayed and will that ever be thrown out completely? >> judge merchan must declare a mistrial in that case because he admitted evidence that was subject to presidential immunity in the supreme court and they've made it clear he's not allowed to do that and that's why he delayed the sentencing in the case and if he does not rule that way, president trump will be able to get that before the supreme court and get a favorable ruling very quickly. stuart: i just want to put the quote back up on the screen, will you please. right after the judge th

department of justice. i have served as a line prosecutor supervisor, the principal associate deputy attorney general, united states attorney and a special council. i've served in these roles with gratitude as the son of immigrants to this country, the 1st member of my family to be born here. my parents grew up in korea and were young children during the korean war. my father remembers being hungry and grateful for the food that americans you guys shared with him and his siblings. my mother fled what is now north korea in her own mother's arms heading south to safety. my parents have actually met married and came to the us, seeking a better life for themselves and for their children. their lives and mine would have been very different, were it not for this country no matter the role, no matter the administration, i have applied the same standards and the same impartiality, my respect for the justice department and my commitment to this country, or why i agreed to serve as special counsel when asked by the attorney general, i resolved to do the work because i did all my work for the department. fairly early and professionally, with close attentio

complete, and on hesitating cooperation with this special councils investigation, justice department, the national archives were proactively notified of the classified documents and they were turned over. the president allowed the f, b i to searches homes. and he shot for volunteer interview for more than 5 hours on october, 8th, and october 9th, even as he was busy responding to a mazda is vicious terrorist attack. and israel, the report best demonstrates president biden's complete devotion to the rule of law . and his respect for a fair and independent department of justice, president biden did not assert executive privilege or claim it absolute immunity for presidential crimes. he did not hide boxes of documents under his bed or in a bath tub. he did not fight investigators, nor did you seek to redact a single word of mister her's report. he consented to the search of numerous locations, including his homes, and he did everything he could to cooperate, not instruct. 3rd, special counsel her repeatedly emphasizes the president biden's conduct contrast sharply with that of former president trump. her observes that unlike the presiden

the now sitting chief judge, said that the department of justice and the attorney general has the power and has the statutory authority to appoint special councilscontrary to the position of judge cannon and the message i think to the 11th circuit and even a conservative panel, is if you are counting on five votes, think again because you can be sure there will be four against judge cannon and then to look at justices kavanagh and robert's prior rulings and prior writings. >> let's look forward to next year on the assumption that kamala harris wins the election and the 11th circuit would hear oral argument on this, i don't know, let's say november 15 or a week or so after the election, issuing a decision. they have been very quick with her decisions. so let's assume they issue a decision before the end of the year. that would then surely if it goes against donald trump be appealed to the supreme court. what does the timetable look like for that? >> it doesn't look like they will hear it in the spring and generally they are at the end of april but only rarely like in the nixon case or the 1934 case i mentioned earlier and they heard that in mid j

the justice department stone walls over the audio of joe biden's interview with special council herr blasts joe biden on his attempt to get to the economy and we dig in whs it's such a loser fertilizer him. hour. there's no limit to how far businesses can go. (♪) we're talking about cashbackin. not a game. not a game! we're talking about cashbackin. we're talking about cashbackin. we're not talking about practice? no. we're talking about cashbackin. we're talking about cashbackin. we're talking about cashbackin. not a game! we've been talking about practice for too long. -word. -no practice. we're talking about cashbackin. we're talking about cashbackin. i mean, we're not talking about a game! cashback like a pro with chase freedom unlimited. how do you cashback? chase. make more of what's yours. her uncle's unhappy. i'm sensing an underlying issue. it's t-mobile. it started when we tried to get him under a new plan. but they they unexpectedly unraveled their “price lock” guarantee. which has made him, a bit... unruly. you called yourself the “un-carrier”. you sing about “price lock”

department of justice. and it just is in striking contrast to the trump administration, where they appointed the department of justice appointed a special counsel and basically every single day that that councill. so it's just remarkable how different the two justice departments are behaving. that was my take on what i was thinking about, the insurrection charge that was raised in the oral arguments today. >> let me also ask you about the other thing that came up i think a bit awkwardly in that exchange between the justice and the lawyer, which was this question of immunity. obviously the supreme court, within just the next days, is going to consider whether or not to leave standing that this ruling this or donald trump doesn't have immunity from prosecution. i think, i mean, i don't know, i think the common wisdom is that they won't take it up, but also that the circuit courts ruling against trump is not in much danger. again, it's a peanut gallery. who knows? we'll see how it goes once the court makes its own decision. do you think there's any interplay for the justices, between what they handled today, this issue of trump's qualifications to be on the ballot, and this next thing that is co

in recent court filing the justice department strongly opposing the release of a audio from president biden's interviewed special councilerns about potential aia manipulation remember this with the same interview which revealed biden's diminishment for competence and what the reason for not recommending criminal charges. in their effort to withhold the recording from the public and the doj or those contend that the original audio falls under executive privilege and releasing it could hinder future investigations. my decision and pulled up in court as deepfake can be made from any audio of biden's voice. then again, allows only thing when it involves going after biden -- trump from a conscript -- casket on the conversation is already public but house republicans believe they may have been cleaned up from what joe actually said. which is only for biden's that the medically that what joe said... [laughter] then what he did in the oval office rug. so while the audience -- the audio has not been made public it turns out joe actually recorded himself during the infamous interview and we got our hands on it. >> as many questio

. >> the white house blinded tonight as the department of justice revealed they will place a special counciloversee the into russian meddling. >> then they launched the robert lern investigation. >> the person leading the investigation robert muller. >> they're mobilizing the doj to go after donald trump because they can't stand that he won. >> the united states believes russia not only tries to influence the election but also helped donald trump beat hillary clinton. >> agencies accuse the russian government of hacking e-mails from the democratic national committee and hillary clinton's campaign. >> my people they say they think it's russian. president putin just said it's not russia. i wouldn't see any reason why it would be. >> reporter: president trump and those working with him had numbers of connections with russia. >> the paul manfort and rick gates will turn themselves in to face charges. >> 12 counts, conspiracy against the united states, unregistered agent of a foreign principle. >> paul mananort was working for free but in reality he used to get paid by a russian and ukrainian. >>

department of justice. looking to the future, i will appoint a special review board to conduct a comprehensive review of the role and procedures of the national security council staff in the conduct of foreign and national security policy. i anticipate receiving the reports from the attorney general and the special review board at the earliest possible date upon the completion of these reports. and i will share their findings and conclusions with the congress and the american people. although not directly involved, vice admiral john poindexter has asked to be relieved of his assignment as assistant to the president for national security affairs and to return to another assignment, the navy lieutenant colonel oliver north has been relieved of his duties on the national security council staff. i am deeply troubled that the implementation of a policy aimed at resolving a truly tragic situation in the middle east has resulted in such controversy. as i've stated previously, i believe our policy goals toward iran were well founded. however, the information brought to my attention yesterday convinced me that in one aspect, implementation of that policy was seriously

department of justice. looking to the future, i will appoint a special review board to conduct a comprehensive review of the role and procedures of the national security council staff in the conduct of foreign and national security policy. i anticipate receiving the reports from the attorney general and the special review board at the earliest possible date upon the completion of these reports. and i will share their findings and conclusions with the congress and the american people. although not directly involved, vice admiral john poindexter has asked to be relieved of his assignment as assistant to the president for national security affairs and to return to another assignment, the navy lieutenant colonel oliver north has been relieved of his duties on the national security council staff. i am deeply troubled that the implementation of a policy aimed at resolving a truly tragic situation in the middle east has resulted in such controversy. as i've stated previously, i believe our policy goals toward iran were well founded. however, the information brought to my attention yesterday convinced me that in one aspect, implementation of that policy was seriously

the attorney general of the states in contempt after the justice department refused to comply with subpoenas or the audio recordings over the president's interview with a special councile no vote from the republicans that would be david joyce of ohio. we're waiting there for nancy, joining us shortly. right now, a larger notice on steak here. >> here we go, this is passed now, the final it is 26207, as you mentioned guided joyce from ohio is that the only republican no vote, he decided to block his party back at least six members early this morning that were still undecided on a defense, and all but one, all but joyce avoided with their party. now what happens next, talking with a drawn it, right before the break about the doj. probably not likely to go after their own boss. the discontent vote has passed but here's what could happen. there is an alternative road for heads or publicans, congresswoman anna pulido of florida is a valve in good to force a vote on an inherent contempt. this is different from what we just so happen on the house floor. inherent contempt basically means it passes, it would direct the house sergeant at arms then to go and arrest garland. esse

department of justice. looking to the future, i will appoint a special review board to conduct a comprehensive review of the role and procedures of the national security counciltaff in the conduct of foreign and national security policy. i anticipate receiving the reports from the attorney general and the special review board at the earliest possible date upon the completion of these reports. and i will share their findings and conclusions with the congress and the american people. although not directly involved, vice admiral john poindexter has asked to be relieved of his assignment as assistant to the president for national security affairs and to return to another assignment, the navy lieutenant colonel oliver north has been relieved of his duties on the national security council staff. i am deeply troubled that the implementation of a policy aimed at resolving a truly tragic situation in the middle east has resulted in such controversy. as i've stated previously, i believe our policy goals toward iran were well founded. however, the information brought to my attention yesterday convinced me that in one aspect, implementation of that policy was seriously f

what biden/harris special council jack smith has done here is a direct violation of the department of justicesnual for the federal prosecutors and agents that makes sense unlawful for them to take action piling 165 middle age political document out of order highly irregular and this obama judge and in is a political assassination attempt by jack smith. liz: should he request de-pate baiting and be disbarred and cnn top legal analyst and el lee honen said these are president trump and ellie calling it a cheep shot and violated ordinary justice department procedures and principles to get trump before the election. he says there's no defending the conduct and legally and politically prejudicial of trump and another judge on the hot seat for doing this before the election. this grand jury testimony is yet to be adjudicated and it's outside of a trial setting. it basically was not subject to the rules of evidence for cross-examination. >> house judiciary chairman jim jordan should issue a subpoena tomorrow for jack smith and put him in the hot seat, put him in front of the cameras and make jack smi